Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Riordan-Dirichlet Group

Riordan-Dirichlet Group

arXiv:1805.05080v1 [math.NT] 14 May 2018 ounvco a h eeaigfunction generating the has vector column ounvco utpidb h matrix the by multiplied vector column edntdby denoted be ..wt h omlpwrsre.Tu,teexpression the Thus, series. power formal generatin the the with with matrices of i.e. columns the associate will We matrices Riordan Ab the 2 ident of analog to an similar obtain we situ identities example, the obtaining an consider As for we matrices. useful 4, Riordan Section be applicat In to practical prove question. the open of a is question wide matrices the find matrices while Riordan aspects. of noted content Rio the the repeats only ma of verbatim call concerns Riordan almost theory will 3 the Section the We and of content of them the objects. between aspects Analogy similar note constructing matrices. the will Dirichlet when for we rely matrices 2, will similar we Section over introduce series In we power 3, formal series. Section of In space the numbers. in triang lower operators infinite certain are to arrays) (Riordan matrices Riordan Introduction 1 Then Matrix ru iia oteRodngop n edrv naao o analog identities. an Abel applic the derive the of we of analog example and an an obtain group, As we group. Riordan th this the show paper, for We formula to this inversion series. In similar Dirichlet group formal series. of a power space formal the of for matrices space the in operators a ( x ira arcsaeifiielwrtinua arcstha matrices triangular lower infinite are matrices Riordan ) n and ( hclm fwhich, of column th a ( ( x a n ) hrwo h matrix the of row th ( , x 1) ) , b 1) ( x : ira-iihe group Riordan-Dirichlet = ) ( a ( X n x ∞ =0 ) , n b )= 1) n 0 = x .Burlachenko E. n a ,        A ( x Abstract 1 a a a a = ) , . . . epcieyby respectively 3 2 0 1 A 2 1 b ... , a h eeaigfunction generating the has a a a 0 0 0 X n ( . . . 2 1 0 ∞ x =0 ) ewl denoted will We . a h eeaigfunction generating the has , a a x 0 0 . . . 1 0 n m X a n =0 0 . . . 0 b m · · · · · · · · · · · · [ . x . Aa a . n lrmtie htcorrespond that matrices ular n        fScin2 u hsanalogy this But 2. Section of ] ucin fterelements, their of functions g − o fteRiordan-Dirichlet the of ion a te bandb en of means by obtained ities ( h edo elo complex or real of field the m to fteematrices, these of ation hs bet h Riordan- the objects these . x tteemtie form matrices these at to hnteematrices these when ation orsodt certain to correspond t piaini aiu fields various in pplication ( = ) x pc ffra Dirichlet formal of space rcsi ocmlt that complete so is trices = eitouesimilar introduce we dnmtie nwhich on matrices rdan ) lidentities. el , a [ n n, ( b x h Lagrange the f hceceto the of coefficient th ( ) → x b ) ] ( en htthe that means A x a ) . ( x . ) x resultant , n a ( x ) will Thus, matrix (a (x) , 1) corresponds to the operator of multiplication by the series a (x). Set of all such matrices form an algebra isomorphic to the algebra of formal : (a (x) , 1)+(b (x) , 1)=(a (x)+ b (x) , 1) , (a (x) , 1)(b (x) , 1)=(b (x) , 1)(a (x) , 1)=(a (x) b (x) , 1) . Matrix nth column of which has the xnan (x) will be denoted by (1, a (x)): 100 0 0 ··· 0 a0 0 0 0 ...  (2)  0 a1 a0 0 0 ··· (1, a (x)) =  (2) (3)  , 0 a2 a1 a0 0 ···  (3) (3) (4)  0 a3 a2 a3 a0 ··· ......  ......  . . . . .  where   n m (m) (0) (0) (1) [x ] a (x)= an , a0 =1, an =0, an = an. Then ∞ ∞ n n n n (m) (1, a (x)) b (x)= bnx a (x)= x bman−m = b (xa (x)) . n=0 n=0 m=0 X X X Thus, matrix (1, a (x)) corresponds to the operator of composition of series. Since (1, a (x)) xnb (x)= xnan (x) b (xa (x)) , then (1, a (x))(b (x) , 1)=(b (xa (x)) , 1)(1, a (x)) ; since (1, a (x)) xnbn (x)= xn(a (x) b (xa (x)))n, then (1, a (x))(1, b (x)) = (1, a (x) b (xa (x))) . Denote (b (x) , 1)(1, a (x))=(b (x) , a (x)) . Such matrix is called the Riordan matrix [1] – [6]. nth column of the Riordan matrix n n has the generating function b (x) x a (x). If b0 =6 0, a0 =6 0, Riordan matrix is called proper. Proper Riordan matrices form a group, called the Riordan group, whose elements are multiplied by the rule: (b (x) , a (x))(f (x) ,g (x))=(b (x) f (xa (x)) , a (x) g (xa (x))) . Identity element of the group is the matrix (1, 1). Inverse element for the matrix (b (x) , a (x)) is the matrix (1/b (xa¯ (x)) , a¯ (x)), where a¯ (x) a (xa¯ (x)) = a (x)¯a (xa (x))=1. Remark 1. Alternative notations for the Riordan matrix defining the composition exists. For example, (1, a (x)), a0 =0; or (1, xa (x)). We have chosen the notation (see [2] – [4]) similar to notation that appears in Section 3 in the construction of the Riordan-Dirichlet matrices. In the algebra of , the power and logarithm of the series a (x), a0 =1, are defined as ∞ ∞ ϕ (−1)n−1 aϕ (x)= (a (x) − 1)n, log a (x)= (a (x) − 1)n. n n n=0 n=1 X   X 2 Power of the series can also be defined as

∞ ϕn ∞ s (ϕ) aϕ (x) = exp (ϕ log a (x)) = (log a (x))n = n xn, n! n! n=0 n=0 X X where sn (ϕ)/n! are the polynomials in ϕ of degree≤ n called convolution polynomials [7]. Explicit form of these polynomials:

s (ϕ) n bm1 bm2 ... bmn s (ϕ)=1, n = ϕm 1 2 n , 0 n! m !m ! ... m ! m=1 1 2 n X X i m where bi = [x ] log a (x) and summation of the coefficient of ϕ is over all monomials m1 m2 mn n n b1 b2 ... bn for which i=1 imi = n, i=1 mi = m. Matrix of the differential operator in the space of formal power series will be denoted P P by Dx:

∞ ′ n−1 Dxa (x)= a (x)= nanx . n=1 X Then

(a (x) b (x))′ = a (x) b′ (x)+ a′ (x) b (x) , (an (x))′ = nan−1 (x) a′ (x) ,

∞ ϕ − 1 (aϕ (x))′ = ϕa′ (x) (a (x) − 1)n−1 = ϕaϕ−1 (x) a′ (x) , n − 1 n=1 X   ∞ (log a (x))′ = a′ (x) (−1)n−1(a (x) − 1)n−1 = a′ (x) a−1 (x) . n=1 X Theorem 1. Each formal power series a (x), a0 = 1, is associated by means of the transform ∞ xn aϕ (x)= [xn] 1 − xβ(log a (x))′ aϕ+βn (x) (1) aβn (x) n=0 X  with the set of series (β)a (x), (0)a (x)= a (x), such that

−β β (β)a xa (x) = a (x) , a x(β)a (x) = (β)a (x) ,   ϕ [xn] aϕ (x) = [xn] 1 − xβ(log a (x))′ aϕ+βn (x)= [xn] aϕ+βn (x) , (β) ϕ + βn

′ ϕ + βn [xn] 1+ xβ log a (x) aϕ (x)= [xn] aϕ (x) = [xn] aϕ+βn (x) . (β) (β) ϕ (β)   Remark 2. Transformation (1) is a particular case of the Lagrange . But, considering our plans, we give an alternative proof which relies only on the properties of the Riordan matrices. −1 Proof. If the matrices (1, a (x)), a0 =1, (1, b (x)), b0 =1, are mutually inverse, then

1, a−1 (x) b (x)= a (x) , (1, b (x)) a (x)= b (x) .

Since  (xnbn (x))′ = nxn−1bn−1 (x) b (x) 1+ x(log b (x))′ , then  ′ Dx (1, b (x)) = b (x) 1+ x(log b (x)) , b (x) Dx,   3 (log b (x))′ (1, b (x)) a′ (x)= . 1+ x(log b (x))′ From this we find: −1 1+ x(log b (x))′, b (x) = 1 − x(log a (x))′, a−1 (x) . Denote   n m (m) n ′ m (m) [x ] a (x)= an , [x ] 1 − x(log a (x)) a (x)= cn , ∞ ∞ (m+n) n  (m+n) n am (x)= an x , cm (x)= cn x . n=0 n=0 X X m We construct the matrix A mth column of which has the generating function x am (x) m and the matrix C mth column of which has the generating function x cm (x): (0) (0) a0 0 0 0 ··· c0 0 0 0 ··· (1) (1) (1) (1) a1 a0 0 0 ··· c1 c0 0 0 ··· A = a(2) a(2) a(2) 0 ··· , C = c(2) c(2) c(2) 0 ··· .  2 1 0   2 1 0  a(3) a(3) a(3) a(3) ··· c(3) c(3) c(3) c(3) ···  3 2 1 0   3 2 1 0   . . . . .   . . . . .   ......   ......      It’s obvious that    [n, →] A = [n, →](an (x) , 1) , [n, →] C = [n, →] 1 − x(log a (x))′ an (x) , 1 . Since  x  1 − xa′ (x) a−1 (x) am (x)= am (x) − (am (x))′, m or  m − n [xn] 1 − x(log a (x))′ am (x)= [xn] am (x) , m then  xn+m Axm 1 − x(log a (x))′ a−m (x)= xn+m Cxma−m (x)= n ′ n  = [x ] 1− x(log a (x)) a (x)=1, n=0; =0,n> 0. Thus,  A = 1+ x(log b (x))′, b (x) , C = (1, b (x)) , m + n [xn] 1+ x(log b (x))′ bm (x)=  [xn] bm (x) = [xn] am+n (x) , m m [xn] bm (x) = [xn] 1 −x(log a (x))′ am+n (x)= [xn] am+n (x) . m + n Denote  −β −1 β 1, a (x) = 1, (β)a (x) . Then  βm  [xn] aβm (x)= [xn] aβm+βn (x) . (β) βm + βn

Let sn (ϕ)/n! are the convolution polynomials of the series a (x). Then ∞ ϕ s (ϕ + βn) aϕ (x)= n xn. (β) ϕ + βn n! n=0 X We note that the identity −1 [n, →] 1 − x(log a (x))′, a−1 (x) = [n, →](an (x) , 1) is equivalent to the Lagrange expansion formula for an arbitrary series f (x): f (x) ∞ xn = [xn] f (x) an (x) . ′ an (x) 1 − x(log a (x)) n=0 X 4 3 Riordan-Dirichlet matrices

In this section, we construct the matrices of certain operators in the space of formal Dirichlet series. We will associate the columns of matrices with the generating functions of their elements, i.e. with the formal Dirichlet series. Numbering of the rows and columns −s −s begins with 1. Coefficient operator will be denoted by [n ]: [n ] a (s)= an. Matrix nth column of which has the generating function n−sa (s) will be denoted by ha (s) , 1i: a1 0000000 ··· a a 000000 ···  2 1  a3 0 a1 00000 ··· a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 ···  4 2 1  a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 ··· ha (s) , 1i =  5 1  . a a a 0 0 a 0 0 ···  6 3 2 1  a 00000 a 0 ···  7 1  a a 0 a 0 0 0 a ···  8 4 2 1   ......   ......    Then   ∞ ∞ n −s −s ha (s) , 1i b (s)= bnn a (s)= n bdan/d = a (s) b (s) , n=1 n=1 X X Xd|n where symbol d|n means that the summation is over all natural divisors d of the number n. Thus, matrix ha (s) , 1i corresponds to the operator of multiplication by the series a (s). Set of all such matrices form an algebra isomorphic to the algebra of formal Dirichlet series: ha (s) , 1i + hb (s) , 1i = ha (s)+ b (s) , 1i , ha (s) , 1ihb (s) , 1i = hb (s) , 1iha (s) , 1i = ha (s) b (s) , 1i .

Remark 3. Matrices ha (s) , 1i, denoted by A = [(an)] , were introduced in [8], [9]. In [9], [10], they are considered as matrices of the operators in the Hilbert space and are called (in [10]) the Dirichlet matrices, or D-matrices. In the algebra of formal Dirichlet series, the power and logarithm of the series a (s), a1 =1, are defined as

∞ ∞ ϕ (−1)n−1 aϕ (s)= (a (s) − 1)n, log a (s)= (a (s) − 1)n. n n n=0 n=1 X   X Power of the series can also be defined as

∞ ϕn ∞ aϕ (s) = exp (ϕ log a (s)) = (log a (s))n = h (ϕ)n−s, n! n n=0 n=1 X X where hn (ϕ) are the polynomials in ϕ of degree < n which, like in the case of power series, can be called convolution polynomials. Explicit form of these polynomials:

n bm2 bm3 ... bmn h (ϕ)=1, h (ϕ)= ϕm 2 3 n , 1 n m !m ! ... m ! m=1 2 3 n X X i m where bi = [x ] log a (s) and summation of the coefficient of ϕ is over all monomials m2 m3 mn n mi n b2 b3 ... bn for which i=2 i = n, i=2 mi = m. Q P

5 Matrix nth column of which has the generating function n−saln n (s) will be denoted by h1, a (s)i:

10000000 ··· (2) 0 a1 000000 ···  (3)  0 0 a1 0 0 0 0 0 ···  (2) (4)  0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 ···  2 1   (5)  h1, a (s)i = 00 0 0 a1 0 0 0 ··· ,  (2) (3) (6)  0 a3 a2 0 0 a1 0 0 ···  (7)  00 0 0 0 0 a 0 ···  1  0 a(2) 0 a(4) 0 0 0 a(8) ···  4 2 1  ......  ......      where −s ln m (m) (1) (1) n a (s)= an , a1 =1, an =0. Then   ∞ ∞ n −s ln n −s (d) h1, a (s)i b (s)= bnn a (s)= n bdan/d = b (s) ◦ a (s) , n=1 n=1 X X Xd|n where sign ◦ means the operation under consideration similar to a composition of power series. Denote hb (s) , 1ih1, a (s)i = hb (s) , a (s)i .

Theorem 2. Matrices hb (s) , a (s)i, b1 =6 0, a1 =6 0, form a group with respect to the matrix multiplication whose elements are multiplied by the rule:

hb (s) , a (s)ihf (s) ,g (s)i = hb (s)(f (s) ◦ a (s)) , a (x)(g (s) ◦ a (s))i .

Proof. Since

∞ ∞ −s −s ln mn −s ln m −s ln n h1, a (s)i m b (s)= bn(mn) a (s)= m a (s) bnn a (s) , n=1 n=1 X X then h1, a (s)ihb (s) , 1i = hb (s) ◦ a (s) , a (s)i . Hence, h1, a (s)i b (s) c (s)=(b (s) ◦ a (s))(c (s) ◦ a (s)) , h1, a (s)i bn (s)=(b (s) ◦ a (s))n, and by definition of power of series

h1, a (s)i bϕ (s)=(b (s) ◦ a (s))ϕ.

Then h1, a (s)i m−sbln m (s)= m−saln m (s)(b (x) ◦ a (x))ln m, h1, a (s)ih1, b (s)i = h1, a (s)(b (s) ◦ a (s))i . If h1, a (s)i−1b−1 (s)= f (s) , h1, a (s)i−1a−1 (s)= g (s) , then hb (s) , a (s)i−1 = hf (s) ,g (s)i .

6 Matrix of the differential operator in the space of formal Dirichlet series will be denoted by Ds: ∞ ′ −s Dsa (s)= a (s)= ln (1/n ) ann . n=1 X Then (a (s) b (s))′ = a (s) b′ (s)+ a′ (s) b (s) , (an (s))′ = nan−1 (s) a′ (s) , ∞ ϕ − 1 (aϕ (s))′ = ϕa′ (s) (a (s) − 1)n−1 = ϕaϕ−1 (s) a′ (s) , n − 1 n=1   X∞ (log a (s))′ = a′ (s) (−1)n−1(a (s) − 1)n−1 = a′ (s) a−1 (s) . n=1 X Theorem 3. Each formal Dirichlet series a (s), a1 = 1, is associated by means of the transform ∞ n−s aϕ (s)= n−s 1+ β(log a (s))′ aϕ+β ln n (s) aβ ln n (s) n=1 X    with the set of series (β)a (s), (0)a (s)= a (s), such that ϕ n−s aϕ (s)= n−s 1+ β(log a (s))′ aϕ+β ln n (s)= n−s aϕ+β ln n (s) , (β) ϕ + β ln n     ϕ+ β ln n   n−s 1 − β log a (s) ′ aϕ (s)= n−s aϕ (s)= n−s aϕ+β ln n (s) . (β) (β) ϕ (β)     −1     Proof. If the matrices h1, a (s)i, a1 =1, h1, b (s)i, b1 =1, are mutually inverse, then 1, a−1 (s) b (s)= a (s) , h1, b (s)i a (s)= b (s) . Since ′ n−sbln n (s) = n−sbln n (s) ln (1/n ) 1 − b′ (s) b−1 (s) , then   ′ Ds h1, b (s)i = 1 − (log b (s)) , b (s) Ds, b′ (s) h1, b (s)i a′ (s)= . 1 − (log b (s))′ From this we find: −1 1 − (log b (s))′, b (s) = 1 + (log a (s))′, a−1 (s) . Denote −s ln m (m) −s ′ ln m (m) n a (s)= an , n 1 + (log a (s)) a (s)= cn , ∞ ∞   (mn) −s  (mn) −s am (s)= an n , cm (s)= cn n . n=1 n=1 X X −s We construct the matrix A mth column of which has the generating function m am (s) −s and the matrix C mth column of which has the generating function m cm (s):

(1) (1) a1 0 0 0 0 0 ··· c1 0 0 0 0 0 ··· (2) (2) (2) (2) a2 a1 0 0 0 0 ··· c2 c1 0 0 0 0 ···  (3) (3)   (3) (3)  a3 0 a1 0 0 0 ··· c3 0 c1 0 0 0 ···  (4) (4) (4)   (4) (4) (4)  a a 0 a 0 0 ··· , c c 0 c 0 0 ···  4 2 1   4 2 1  a(5) 0 0 0 a(5) 0 ··· c(5) 0 0 0 c(5) 0 ···  5 1   5 1   (6) (6) (6) (6)   (6) (6) (6) (6)  a6 a3 a2 0 0 a1 ··· c6 c3 c2 0 0 c1 ···  ......   ......   ......   ......          7 It’s obvious that [n, →] A = [n, →] aln n (s) , 1 , [n, →] C = [n, →] 1 + (log a (s))′aln n (s) , 1 . Since 1 ′ 1+ a′ (s) a−1 (s) aln m (s)= aln m (s)+ aln m (s) , ln m or   ln (m/n ) n−s 1 + (log a (s))′ aln m (s)= n−s aln m (s) , ln m then     

(nm)−s Am−s 1 + (log a (s))′ a− ln m (s)= (nm)−s Cm−sa− ln m (s)=

 = n−s 1 + (log a (x))′ aln n (s)=1, n=1; =0,n> 1. Thus,    A = 1 − (log b (s))′, b (s) , C = h1, b (s)i , ln mn n−s 1 − (log b ( s))′ bln m (s)= n−s bln m (s)= n−s aln mn (s) , ln m      ln m   n−s bln m (s)= n−s 1 + (log a (s))′ aln mn (s)= n−s aln mn (s) . ln mn Denote        −β −1 β 1, a (s) = 1, (β)a (s) . Then β ln m n−s aβ ln m (s)= n−s aβ ln m+β ln n (s) . (β) β ln m + β ln n     Let hn (ϕ) are the convolution polynomials of the series a (s). Then

∞ ϕ aϕ (s)= h (ϕ + β ln n) n−s. (β) ϕ + β ln n n n=1 X We note that the identity

−1 [n, →] 1 + (log a (s))′, a−1 (s) = [n, →] aln n (s) , 1 is equivalent to a formula similar to the Lagrange expansion formula:

f (s) ∞ n−s = n−s f (s) aln n (s) . ′ aln n (s) 1 + (log a (s)) n=1 X   4 Some examples

In this section, we show how matrices h1, a (s)i can be used for the next construction. Each formal power series a (x), a0 =1, with convolution polynomials sn (ϕ)/n! is put in correspondence with the formal Dirichlet series a (s) such that

∞ ∞ ∞ s (ϕ) s (ϕ) s (ϕ) ...s r (ϕ) aϕ (s)= n p−ns =1+ m1 m2 m n−s, n! m !m ! ... m ! p=2 n=0 ! n=2 1 2 r Y X X m1 m2 mr where the product is taken over all prime numbers and n = p1 p2 ... pr is the canon- ical decomposition of number n. With this correspondence, the group of series a (x) is isomorphic to the group of series a (s): if a (x) b (x) = c (x), then a (s) b (s) = c (s). If

8 m −s m [x ] log a (x)= bm, then [n ] log a (s)= bm when n = p , where p is the , and [n−s] log a (s)=0 otherwise. Polynomials

sm1 (ϕ) sm2 (ϕ) ...smr (ϕ) hn (ϕ)= m1!m2! ... mr! are the convolution polynomials of the series a (s). Dirichlet series corresponding to the exponential series will be denoted by ε (s):

∞ ϕm1+m2+...+mr εϕ (s)=1+ n−s. m !m ! ... m ! n=2 1 2 r X −s Note that log ε (s)= p , where the summation is over all prime numbers. Let (1)ε (s) denote the series associated with ε (s) by Theorem 3. Then P ϕv(n) ϕ(ϕ + ln n)v(n)−1 n−s εϕ (s)= , n−s εϕ (s)= , f (n) (1) f (n)     where

v (1) = 0, v (n)= m1 + m2 + ... + mr, f (1) = 1, f (n)= m1!m2!...mr!.

From ϕ+β ϕ β (1)ε (s)= (1)ε (s) (1)ε (s) we obtain an analog of the Abel’s generalized binomial formula:

n (ϕ + β)(ϕ + β + ln n)v(n)−1 = ϕ(ϕ + ln d)v(d)−1β(β + ln (n/d ))v(n/d )−1, d f Xd|n   where n f (n) = . d f (d) f (n/d )  f Since −s ′ ϕ −s ϕ+ln n n 1 − log (1)ε (s) (1)ε (s)= n ε (s) , from        ′ ϕ+β ′ ϕ β 1 − log (1)ε (s) (1)ε (s)= 1 − log (1)ε (s) (1)ε (s) (1)ε (s) we obtain       n (ϕ + β + ln n)v(n) = (ϕ + ln d)v(d)β(β + ln (n/d ))v(n/d )−1. d f Xd|n   Since n −s (d) (d) −s ln d n h1, a (s)i b (s)= bdan/d , an/d = (n/d ) a (s) , d|n   X   from ϕ ϕ ϕ −1 ϕ (1)ε (s)= 1, (1)ε (s) ε (s) , ε (x)= 1,ε (s) (1)ε (s) we obtain n ϕ(ϕ + ln n)v(n)−1 = ϕv(d) ln d(ln n)v(n/d )−1, d f Xd|n   n ϕv(n) = ϕ(ϕ + ln d)v(d)−1(ln (1/d ))v(n/d ). d f Xd|n   9 When n = pm, where p is the prime number, obtained formulas take the form of Abel identities [3], [11, pp. 92-99]:

m m (ϕ + β)(ϕ + β + ma)m−1 = ϕ(ϕ + ka)k−1β(β +(m − k) a)m−k−1, k Xk=0   m m (ϕ + β + ma)m = (ϕ + ka)kβ(β +(m − k) a)m−k−1, k Xk=0   m m ϕ(ϕ + ma)m−1 = ϕkka(ma)m−k−1, k Xk=0   m m ϕm = ϕ(ϕ + ka)k−1(−ka)m−k, a = ln p. k Xk=0   We generalize this example. Let there be given the series a (s) such that

u (ϕ) n−s aϕ (s)= n , f (n)   where m1 m2 mr un (ϕ)= sm1 (ϕ) sm2 (ϕ) ...smr (ϕ) , n = p1 p2 ... pr . Then ϕ u (ϕ + β ln n) n−s aϕ (s)= n , (β) ϕ + β ln n f (n) ϕ   β ϕ ϕ −β ϕ (β)a (s)= 1, (β)a (s) a (s) , a (s)= 1, a (s) (β)a (s) , ϕ n ln d un (ϕ + β ln n)= ud (ϕ) un/d (β ln n) , ϕ + β ln n d f ln n Xd|n   n ϕ un (ϕ)= ud (ϕ + β ln d)un/d (β ln (1/d )) . d f ϕ + β ln d Xd|n   m Since upm (ϕ)= sm (ϕ), when n = p formulas take the form of mutually inverse relations for the Lagrange series:

m ϕ m k s (ϕ + ma)= s (ϕ) s (ma) , ϕ + ma m k k m m−k Xk=0   m m ϕ s (ϕ)= s (ϕ + ka) s (−ka) , a = β ln p. m k ϕ + ka k m−k Xk=0   n We note the identities for the coefficients d f similar to the identities

n n  n n =2n; k(−1)n−k =0, n =16 . k k Xk=0   Xk=0   Since ε (s) ε (s)= ε2 (s); ε′ (x) ε−1 (x) = (log ε (x))′, then

n n =2v(n); ln d(−1)v(n/d ) =0, n =6 p. d f d f Xd|n   Xd|n  

10 References

[1] L. Shapiro, S. Getu, W. Woan, L. Woodson, The Riordan group, Discrete Appl. Math. 34 (1991) 229-339.

[2] R. Sprugnoli, Riordan arrays and combinatorial sums, Discrete Math. 132 (1994) 267-290.

[3] R. Sprugnoli, Riordan arrays and Abel-Gould identity, Discrete Math. 142 (1-3) (1995) 213-233.

[4] D. Merlini, D. G. Rogers, R. Sprugnoli and M. C. Verri, On some alternative char- acterizations of Riordan arrays, Can. J. Math. 49 (1997) 301-320.

[5] W, Wang, T. Wang, Generalized Riordan arrays, Discrete Math. 308 (2008) 6466- 6500.

[6] P. Barry, A study of integer , Riordan arrays, Pascal-like arrays and Hankel transforms, University College Cork, 2009.

[7] Donald E. Knuth, Convolution polynomials, Mathematica J. 2 (1992), no. 4, 67-78.

[8] A. Sowa, Factorizing matrices by Dirichlet multiplication, Linear Algebra Appl. 438 (2013) 2385-2393.

[9] A. Sowa, The Dirichlet ring and unconditional bases in L2 [0, 2π], Funct. Anal. Appl. 47 (2013) 227-232.

[10] A. Sowa, On the Dirichlet matrix operators in spaces, Applicationes Math- ematicae, 44 (2017) 185-196.

[11] J. Riordan, Combinatorial Identities, New York: Wiley, 1968.

E-mail: [email protected]

11