Environmental Characteristics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Characteristics DRAFT Comments and Coordination Report Neptune Road PD&E FPID: 445415-1 PS-18-9905-DG ETDM: 14402 Federal Aid Project Number: N/A Prepared for: Osceola County, Florida Department of Transportation and Transit 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 3100 Kissimmee, FL 34741 NOVEMBER 2019 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 COMMENTS AND COORDINATION REPORT OVERVIEW ..................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT GOALS ............................................................................................................................1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................1 4.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................4 4.1 Public Outreach Overview ................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 Outreach Techniques .......................................................................................................................... 4 4.2.1 Project Website ............................................................................................................................ 4 4.2.2 Newsletters ................................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 AGENCY COORDINATION ..............................................................................................................6 6.0 PUBLIC OUTREACH ..................................................................................................................... 10 6.1 Alternatives Public Meeting .............................................................................................................. 10 6.2 Public Hearing .................................................................................................................................... 11 7.0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT MEETINGS ................................................................................................ 12 8.0 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 12 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 2 Exhibit 2: Project Limits................................................................................................................................. 3 Exhibit 3: Comments from Project Website ................................................................................................. 5 Exhibit 4: Comments Received from Alternatives Meeting ........................................................................ 11 APPENDICES Appendix A: Public Involvement Program Appendix B: Advance Notification Appendix C: Alternatives Public Meeting Summary (April 11, 2019) Appendix D: Public Hearing Summary (TBD, 2020) Appendix E: Board of County Commissioners Presentation Summary (May 13, 2019) Comments and Coordination Report i Neptune Road Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study November 2019 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1.0 COMMENTS AND COORDINATION REPORT OVERVIEW This report documents the public involvement activities accomplished throughout the Neptune Road Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study process. This report includes various correspondence received from coordination efforts with the public-at-large, local, state, and federal agencies, and other project stakeholders. This document also includes copies of notification materials, project newsletters, presentation handouts, sign-in sheets, comments forms, as well as additional supplementary materials developed as part of the public outreach process. 2.0 PROJECT GOALS The overall goal of the Neptune Road PD&E Study is to develop a locally preferred alternative concept to enhance mobility from US 192 and St. Cloud to Downtown Kissimmee, improve access to NeoCity, and improve overall traffic operations of the existing highway network within the project study area with minimized social, economic, and environmental impacts. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project involves a 3.9-mile segment of Neptune Road extending from Partin Settlement Road to US 192 in Osceola County, Florida. The section east of the St. Cloud canal (approximately 1.1 miles in length) is within the City of St. Cloud. From Partin Settlement Road to Old Canoe Creek Road, the proposed project improves the existing 2-lane roadway to a 4-lane, divided roadway with a curbed median, with premium bicycle and pedestrian facilities (i.e., bike lanes, multiuse path(s), and/or sidewalks). From Old Canoe Creek Road to US 192, the project widens the existing 2-lane roadway to 4- lanes with sidewalks. Bridge structures are to be replaced and stormwater management facilities will be evaluated. Exhibit 1 illustrates the project location and Exhibit 2 illustrates the project limits. Comments and Coordination Report 1 Neptune Road Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study November 2019 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Exhibit 1: Project Location Comments and Coordination Report 2 Neptune Road Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study November 2019 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Exhibit 2: Project Limits Comments and Coordination Report 3 Neptune Road Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study November 2019 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM A Public Involvement Program (PIP) was developed and has been carried out as part of the Neptune Road PD&E Study. The PIP was developed in compliance with the “Project Development and Environment Manual,” Florida Statute 339.155, Executive Orders 11990 and 11988, CEQ Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, and 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 771. The purpose of the PIP was to document the tools and techniques used to establish and maintain communication with the public-at-large, local, state, and federal agencies, and other project stakeholders. As a result of extensive public involvement, the project team has been able to effectively build consensus among interested stakeholders. The PIP is provided in Appendix A. 4.1 PUBLIC OUTREACH OVERVIEW Public outreach is a key component of this study. The ability to build consensus among affected stakeholders and the public-at-large is vital to the successful outcome of this study. The overall goal of public outreach is to enable the results of the study to be reflective of the values and needs of the community at-large. 4.2 OUTREACH TECHNIQUES The project team has employed several outreach techniques geared towards reaching the affected public and the community at-large. Public outreach techniques included a project website, project newsletters, mailings to local, state, and federal agencies and property owners/tenants in the study area, display advertisements in the Osceola News Gazette, and press releases to local media outlets. 4.2.1 PROJECT WEBSITE A project website (http://www.improveneptuneroad.com), was created which provided updated information about the project. The website initially introduced the study and described the initial improvement concept, provided answers to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), identified the study schedule, provided contact information and provided an opportunity to provide comments. The FAQs were expanded during the study to include responses to additional questions from the public and the website was updated to include the various newsletters. Alternatives being considered were posted prior to the Alternatives Meeting and materials presented at the meeting were added following the meeting. The Preferred Alternative was posted after considering input from the Alternatives Meeting. Exhibit 3 summarizes the 21 comments received from the project website (not including comments from seven people in response to the Alternatives Meeting which are included on Exhibit 5-2). Most comments were requesting additional information about the project, which was provided to them. Four comments requested a full median at Twelve Oaks Circle. Single comments were provided about the following: Improve Neptune Road as soon as possible (ASAP), Access concerns about Sugar Cane Drive, Fix the Peg Horn Sough, Supports the improvement, Don’t widen the portion east of Old Canoe Creek Road to the south side of the road, and Request to be added to the mailing list. Comments and Coordination Report 4 Neptune Road Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study November 2019 │ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Exhibit 3: Comments from Project Website Section to be completed following the Public Hearing. 4.2.2 NEWSLETTERS Three bilingual (English and Spanish) newsletters were prepared for the study and mailed to each property owner and occupant (if different from property owner) located along the corridor. The initial mailing list included properties within 300 feet of the corridor; however, the list was expanded to include adjacent neighborhoods with any properties within the 300-foot buffer. The newsletters were sent early in the study to provide notice of the initiation of the study, prior to the Alternatives Meeting to notify people of the meeting, and prior to the Public Hearing to notify people of the hearing. Comments and Coordination Report 5 Neptune Road Project
Recommended publications
  • Additional Players to Watch Players to Watch
    USTA PRO CIRCUIT PLAYER INFORMATION PLAYERS TO WATCH Prakash Amritraj (IND) pg. 2 Kevin Kim pg. 6 Kevin Anderson (RSA) Evan King Carsten Ball (AUS) Austin Krajicek Brian Battistone Alex Kuznetsov Dann Battistone Jesse Levine Alex Bogomolov Jr. pg. 3 Michael McClune pg. 7 Devin Britton Nicholas Monroe Chase Buchanan Wayne Odesnik Lester Cook Rajeev Ram Ryler DeHeart Bobby Reynolds Amer Delic pg. 4 Michael Russell pg. 8 Taylor Dent Tim Smyczek Somdev Devvarman (IND) Vince Spadea Alexander Domijan Blake Strode Brendan Evans Ryan Sweeting Jan-Michael Gambill pg. 5 Bernard Tomic (AUS) pg. 9 Robby Ginepri Michael Venus Ryan Harrison Jesse Witten Scoville Jenkins Michael Yani Robert Kendrick Donald Young ADDITIONAL PLAYERS TO WATCH Jean-Yves Aubone pg. 10 Nick Lindahl (AUS) pg. 12 Sekou Bangoura Eric Nunez Stephen Bass Greg Ouellette Yuki Bhambri (IND) Nathan Pasha Alex Clayton Todd Paul Jordan Cox Conor Pollock Benedikt Dorsch (GER) Robbye Poole Adam El Mihdawy Tennys Sandgren Mitchell Frank Raymond Sarmiento Bjorn Fratangelo Nate Schnugg Marcus Fugate pg. 11 Holden Seguso pg. 13 Chris Guccione (AUS) Phillip Simmonds Jarmere Jenkins John-Patrick Smith Steve Johnson Jack Sock Roy Kalmanovich Ryan Thacher Bradley Klahn Nathan Thompson Justin Kronauge Ty Trombetta Nikita Kryvonos Kaes Van’t Hof Denis Kudla Todd Widom Harel Levy (ISR) Dennis Zivkovic ** All players American unless otherwise noted. * All information as of February 1, 2010 P L A Y E R S T O W A T C H Prakash Amritraj (IND) Age: 26 (10/2/83) Hometown: Encino, Calif. 2009 year-end ranking: 215 Amritraj represents India in Davis Cup but has strong ties—with strong results—in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardinal Court Club
    2007 Stanford Tennis Taube Tennis Center Led by the exceptional generosity of Tad and Dianne Taube, approximately 1,300 people have graciously donated almost $20 million in the past 17 years to create and complete the beautiful Taube Tennis Center. Stanford Directory Cardinal Quick Facts INsiDE FroNT COVER: Pictorial review of this Stanford Men’s Tennis Location: ........................................ Stanford, CA 94305 phenomenal community resource. John Whitlinger, Head Coach .............. (650) 725-5648 Founded: ................................................................. 1891 INsiDE REar coVER: The History. David Hodge, Assistant Coach ............. (650) 725-7195 Enrollment: ................. 13,075 (6,556 undergraduates) The Facility Today. J.J. Whitlinger, Volunteer Asst. Coach President: ............................................... John Hennessy Stanford Women’s Tennis Athletic Director: ...................................... Bob Bowlsby Lele Forood, Head Coach .................... (650) 723-9540 Colors: ........................................... Cardinal and White On the front cover: 2006 All-American Matt Bruch Frankie Brennan, Asst. Coach ............. (650) 725-7978 Nickname: ........................................................ Cardinal Conference: .................................................... Pacific-10 Credits: The 2007 Stanford Tennis Press Guide was written Dick Gould, Dir. of Tennis .................. (650) 723-1160 Men’s Tennis and edited by Gary Migdol and Brian Risso. Editorial assistance Tennis
    [Show full text]
  • Media Guide Template
    THE US OPEN T O Throughout its 133-year history, the US Open has dared its entrants to dream U R I N big, to strive for excellence in each and every match, and in turn the Open has N F A O done the same. It has moved from the West Side Tennis Club in Forest Hills to the M USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center, one of the largest public tennis facili - E N ties in the world, and plays its marquee matches in Arthur Ashe Stadium, the T largest tennis stadium in the world. Over the years, the US Open has drawn inspiration from tennis heroes such as Billie Jean King and Arthur Ashe, as well as the innumerable world-class players who have taken part in the event and, of course, from the hundreds of thousands of fans whose dedication to the sport and the F G A event have made the US Open a true sports and entertainment spectacular. In fact, more than R C O I L 700,000 fans on-site make the US Open the world’s largest-attended annual sporting event, and U I T N more than 53 million online visitors plus a global television audience share in the thrill and excite - Y D & ment each year. S Starting with Arthur Ashe Kids’ Day—the world's largest single-day, grass-roots tennis and entertainment event—straight through Finals Weekend, the US Open honors its future and its past, celebrating those who have made the tournament what it is today while also focusing on the next generation that will write tennis history well into the coming decades.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 World Teamtennis Media Information
    2019 World TeamTennis Media Information FACTS & FIGURES ..................................................................................................... 2 BROADCAST OUTLETS & HAWK-EYE LIVE ................................................................. 4 TEAM ROSTERS ......................................................................................................... 6 2019 WTT SCHEDULE ............................................................................................... 8 TEAM VENUES ........................................................................................................ 10 MORE ABOUT WORLD TEAMTENNIS ...................................................................... 11 Important Things To Know .................................................................................. 12 Innovations & Firsts ............................................................................................ 14 Milestones .......................................................................................................... 15 WTT FINALS & CHAMPIONS ................................................................................... 17 FACTS & FIGURES What: World TeamTennis showcases the best in professional tennis with the innovative team format co-founded by Billie Jean King in the 1970s. Recognized as the leader in professional team tennis competition, WTT features many of the world’s best players competing annually for the King Trophy, the league’s championship trophy named after King. 2019 Teams: New York
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Ncaa Mens Doubles 5-30.Indd
    2011 NCAA DIVISION I MEN’S TENNIS DOUBLES CHAMPIONSHIP Stanford, Calif. • Taube Family Tennis Center • Stanford University • May 26-30 First Round Round of 16 Quarterfi nals Semifi nals Finals Semifi nals Quarterfi nals Round of 16 First Round May 26 May 27 May 28 May 29 May 30 May 29 May 28 May 27 May 26 Boris Conkic-John-Patrick Smith (1), Nick Andrews-Christoffer Konigsfeldt, 1 Tennessee California 17 Conkic-Smith Bangoura Jr.-Lacroix Matt Allare-Peter Kobelt, Sekou Bangoura Jr.-Alexandre Lacroix, 7-6 (5), 6-2 6-4, 7-5 2 Ohio State Florida 18 King-Spir Bangoura, Jr.-Lacroix Kevin King-Juan Spir, Raony Carvalho-Rafael Garcia, 6-2, 5-7, 7-5 3 Georgia Tech 6-3, 6-4 Texas Tech 19 King-Spir Carlsson-Skupski Kyle McMorrow-Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan, Sebastian Carlsson-Neal Skupski (5-8), 4-6, 7-6 (2), 6-1 6-3, 3-6, 6-4 4 Washington LSU 20 King-Spir Bangoura, Jr.-Lacroix Reid Carleton-Henrique Cunha (5-8), 2 p.m. Steve Johnson-Ray Sarmiento, 6-7 (5), 6-4, 6-4 6-3, 6-2 5 Duke USC 21 Carleton-Cunha Buchanan-Rola Christoph Thiemann-Marcel Thiemann, Chase Buchanan-Blaz Rola, 3-6, 6-3, 7-6 (2) 6-2, 7-5 6 Mississippi Ohio State 22 Dadamo-Krajicek Carleton-Cunha Childs-Maksimcuk Jean Andersen-Ed Corrie, 6-4, 7-6 (7) Austen Childs-Viktor Maksimcuk, 6-2, 6-2 7 Texas 7-6 (5), 6-1 Louisville 23 Andersen-Corrie Childs-Maksimcuk Andre Dome-Alexander Sonesson, Javier Garrapiz-Hernus Pieters (4), 6-3, 6-3 4-6, 6-4, 6-4 8 Cal Poly Georgia 24 Dadamo-Krajicek Jeff Dadamo-Austin Krajicek (3), Clifford Marsland-Ashley Watling, 7-6 (4), 6-3 9 Texas A&M Tulsa 25 NATIONAL Dadamo-Krajicek Marsland-Watling Alex Domijan-Jarmere Jenkins, CHAMPIONS Dean Jackson-Patrick Pohlmann, 6-4, 6-3 6-4, 7-5 10 Virginia San Diego 26 6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • RISING STOCK By: Joey Brew
    RISING STOCK By: Joey Brew n 2009 Colin Fleming and Ken Skupski four finals. They came into the public eye line at completed a most remarkable journey. After Queen’s, where they defeated the Bryan brothers in starting the year competing on the lowly a memorable match on centre court. futures circuit, they ended it by becoming a double winner on the ATP World Tour. Their success seemed to impact their respective singles careers, with Skupski seemingly giving it up “Flemski” as they call themselves, are both altogether, and Fleming forced to play challenger university graduates, Skupski from Louisiana and qualifying, which wasn’t always possible as Fleming from Stirling. For Skupski, turning pro was Flemski was often appearing in the finals of the the obvious choice after coming out of the excellent doubles in the previous tournament. Fleming though American collegiate system, but Fleming, who was did win a futures event in London in September. forging a successful partnership with Jamie Murray before going back to complete his degree, went into After a heartbreaking first round defeat at work before deciding he didn’t want to look back Wimbledon, Fleming and Skupski returned to the on his life and think “what if.” challenger circuit, reaching finals in Pozoblanco plus Manchester and winning the Granby title. Although they go about it in different ways, both Their big breakthrough came as they gained entry are orthodox doubles players who like to approach into an ATP Tour event in Metz, their first direct the net. Skupski is a ball basher in the mode of entry into a main tour event.
    [Show full text]
  • Tournament Notes
    TOURNAMENT NOTES as of November 12, 2015 PENSACOLA FUTURES CHAMPIONSHIPS PENSACOLA, FL • NOVEMBER 13-22 USTA PRO CIRCUIT RETURNS TO PENSACOLA TOURNAMENT INFORMATION The Pensacola Futures Championships returns to Pensacola for the sixth consecutive year and Site: Roger Scott Tennis Center the 14th year overall; the city hosted USTA Pro Pensacola, Fla. Circuit men’s events from 1979 to 1983 and from 2002 to 2004. It is the last USTA Pro Websites: www.pensacolasports.com Kenasw USTA/Dave Circuit men’s event of the year. It is also the procircuit.usta.com last of three consecutive clay-court events to Facebook: The Pensacola Futures Championship conclude the year. In conjunction with USTA Player Development, the USTA Pro Circuit Qualifying Draw Begins: Friday, Nov. 13 continues to emphasize the importance of Main Draw Begins: Tuesday, Nov. 17 increased training for younger players on clay. Main Draw: 32 Singles / 16 Doubles To follow the tournament, download the USTA Surface: Clay / Outdoor Pro Circuit’s new phone app for smartphones and tablets by searching “procircuit” in the Prize Money: $10,000 Apple and Google Play stores. Tournament Director: Skip Vogelsang, (850) 776-7951 Notable players competing in Pensacola [email protected] include: Tournament Press Contact: Evan King, a 2013 graduate of the University Evan King was a three-time All-American at the Joseph Goodspeed, (850) 293-4456 of Michigan, who was a three-time All- University of Michigan. He holds 13 USTA Pro [email protected] American (2011-13) and the Big Ten Athlete Circuit and ITF Pro Circuit doubles titles, as of the Year in 2012 and 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Men's Tennis Record Book Men's Tennis Record Book.Qxd
    SEC Men’s Tennis Record Book SEC CHAMPIONS Year Champion Points Tournament Site Year Champion Points Tournament Site 1938 Georgia Tech 24 1986 Tennessee 25 Auburn, Ala. 1939 Tulane 19 1987 Georgia 26 Gainesville, Fla. 1940 LSU 19 1988 Georgia 20 Lexington, Ky. 1941 Tulane 18 1989 Georgia 22 Starkville, Miss. 1942 Tulane 21 Year Champion Points Tourn. Champion (Site) 1946 Georgia Tech 17 New Orleans, La. 1990 Tennessee 12 Tennessee (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1947 Tulane 23 New Orleans, La. 1991 Georgia 11 Georgia (Oxford, Miss.) 1948 Tulane 23 New Orleans, La. 1992 Kentucky 12.5 Kentucky (Nashville, Tenn.) 1949 Tulane 23 New Orleans, La. 1993 Georgia & Miss. St. 12.5 Georgia (Athens, Ga.) 1950 Florida 25 Nashville, Tenn. 1994 Florida 13 Florida (Tuscaloosa, Ala.) 1951 Tennessee & Tulane 24 Gainesville, Fla. 1995 Georgia 14 Georgia (Baton Rouge, La.) 1952 Tulane 32 New Orleans, La. 1996 Ole Miss & Georgia 12 Miss. St. (Fayetteville, Ark.) 1953 Tulane 36 Tuscaloosa, Ala. 1997 Ole Miss & Georgia 12 Ole Miss (Columbia, S.C.) 1954 Tulane 29 Athens, Ga. 1998 LSU 15 LSU (Auburn, Ala.) 1955 Tulane 32 New Orleans, La. 1999 LSU & Georgia 11 LSU (Gainesville, Fla.) 1956 Tulane 31 Atlanta, Ga. Year Champion Record Tourn. Champion (Site) 1957 Tulane 31 Baton Rouge, La. 2000 Florida & Tennessee 10-1 Florida (Starkville, Miss.) 1958 Tulane 32 New Orleans, La. 2001 Georgia 11-0 Georgia (Lexington, Ky.) 1959 Tulane 34 Starkville, Miss. 2002 Georgia 10-1 Tennessee (Knoxville, Tenn.) 1960 Georgia Tech 26 Knoxville, Tenn. 2003 Florida 11-0 Vanderbilt (Oxford, Miss.) 1961 Florida 30 Gainesville, Fla. 2004 Ole Miss 9-2 Georgia (Nashville, Tenn.) 1962 Tulane 28 Nashville, Tenn.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Media Guide
    2020 Media Guide Feb. 14-16 Feb. 15-23 YellowTennisBall.com 2020 QUICK FACTS EXECUTIVE STAFF ATP TOUR 250 EVENT DATES Tournament Director.................Mark Baron Main Draw .......................................Feb. 17-23 February 14-23, 2020 Tournament Chairman .............. Ivan Baron 16-Player Qualifying: ..................Feb. 15-16 Executive Director ......................John Butler Main Draw ....32 singles, 16-team doubles EVENT HISTORY Dir. Business Development, Sponsor Singles Format .......Best of 3 tie-break sets ATP 250: 28th Annual Liaison & Ticketing ...................Adam Baron Doubles Format ...............2 sets to 6 games ATP Champions Tour: 12th Annual Dir. Social Media, Volunteers, VolleyGirls, (no-ad scoring) with regular tie-break 6-6 22nd Year in Delray Beach Sponsor Relations ................... Marlena Hall Match tie-break at one-set each Assistant Special Events and Ticketing (1st team to 10 pts, win by 2) TITLE SPONSOR Manager ...............................Alexis Crenshaw Total Prize Money ........................... $673,655 City of Delray Beach Singles Winner ....................................$97,585 PRESENTING SPONSOR SUPPORT STAFF Doubles Winners................................$34,100 VITACOST.com Ball Kids Coordinator ................Monica Sica 2019 Singles Champion ........... Radu Albot Media Dir ........Natalie Milkolich-Cintorino 2019 Doubles Champions .............................. TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR Public Relations ...................................BlueIvy Bob & Mike Bryan Mark S. Baron
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Open 13 Provence - Singles
    OPEN 13 PROVENCE – ATP MEDIA NOTES PREVIEW & DAY 1 – MONDAY 8 MARCH 2021 Palais de Sports | Marseille, France | 8-14 March 2021 ATP Tour Tournament Media ATPTour.com Open13.fr Stephanie Natal: [email protected] (ATP PR) @ATPTour @Open13 Eli Weinstein: [email protected] (Media Desk) #ThisIsTennis #Open13Provence TV & Radio: TennisTV.com 2021 OPEN 13 PROVENCE - SINGLES SEED PLAYER CAREER W-L (BEST FINISH) MARSEILLE W-L (BEST FINISH) 1 Daniil Medvedev (RUS) 169-88 (9 Titles) 3-2 (2017, 2020 QF) 2 Stefanos Tsitsipas (GRE) 142-78 (5 Titles) 8-2 (2019, 2020 Champion) 3 Karen Khachanov (RUS) 146-115 (4 Titles) 5-2 (2018 Champion) 4 Ugo Humbert (FRA) 46-42 (2 Titles) 3-1 (2019 SF) 5 Jannik Sinner (ITA) 35-23 (2 Titles) 1-1 (2020 2R) 6 Kei Nishikori (JPN) 407-198 (12 Titles) 0-0 (Debut) Alejandro Davidovich 19-22 (2 SFs) 0-0 (Debut) 7 Fokina (ESP) 8 Yoshihito Nishioka (JPN) 67-74 (1 Title) 0-0 (Debut) Tournament History 1993-Present (29th Edition in 2021) Singles Final Sunday 14 March not before 2:00 pm Qualifiers (4) TBD on Monday 8 March Wild Cards (3) Benjamin Bonzi (FRA), Hugo Gaston (FRA), Petros Tsitsipas (GRE) Oldest Player Feliciano Lopez (39) #NextGenATP (3) Hugo Gaston (20), Jannik Sinner (19), Petros Tsitsipas (20) Tournament Records Most Wins – Gilles Simon (29) Most Titles – Thomas Enqvist, Marc Rosset, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (3) Youngest Champion – Stefanos Tsitsipas, 20, in 2019 Oldest Champion - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, 31, in 2017 Lowest-Ranked Champion: No. 79 Michael Llodra in 2010 COUNTRY BREAKDOWN (13) France (7) Gregoire
    [Show full text]
  • SINGLES FINAL [Q] Ernests Gulbis (LAT) Vs [3] Stefanos
    INTRUM STOCKHOLM OPEN: 21 OCTOBER MEDIA NOTES Kungliga Tennishallen | Stockholm, Sweden | 15-21 October 2018 Draw: S-28, D-16 | Prize Money: €612,755 | Surface: Indoor Hard ATP World Tour Info Tournament Info ATP PR & Marketing ATPWorldTour.com StockholmOpen.se Maria Garcia-Planas: [email protected] Twitter: @ATPWorldTour @IntrumSthlmOpen Press Officer: [email protected] Facebook: @ATPWorldTour @IntrumStockholmOpen TV & Radio: TennisTV.com SINGLES FINAL [Q] Ernests Gulbis (LAT) vs [3] Stefanos Tsitsipas (GRE) First Meeting Gulbis 2018 Summary | 30 years old | World No. 145 | 8-4 in 2018 | 7-2 in Stockholm (2018 Finalist) | 6 Career Titles • Reached 1st final since Nice in May 2014 after claiming 19th Top 10 win of career in semi-final on Saturday over World No. 10 Isner. This week was also his 1st ATP World Tour semi-final showing since October 2015 in Vienna. • First qualifier to reach Stockholm final since Jarkko Nieminen in 2001 (l. to Schalken). No qualifier has won the Stockholm title in the Open Era. • Has never lost in an ATP World Tour final (6-0 singles, 2-0 doubles). His last title came at 2014 Nice (d. Delbonis). • Qualifiers are 8-2 in ATP World Tour finals this season, an all-time best. • 4 of his 8 wins this season have come in Grand Slam play as a qualifier. Reached 2R at Roland Garros (d. Muller, l. to Berretini) and 4R at Wimbledon (d. No. 3 Zverev, l. to Nishikori). • Also qualified in Sofia (l. to Troicki) and Dubai (l. to Pouille), falling in 1R in both. • 9-9 record on ATP Challenger Tour in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Draw Singles
    ITA Men's All-American Championships Main Draw Singles Times 1st Round, Thursday 2nd Round, Thurs. 10:30 1 Blaz Rola (1), Ohio State 2 Andre Dome (Q), Cal Poly 10:30 3 Jarmere Jenkins, Virginia 3:00 4 Alex Musialek, Kentucky 8:00 5 Ashley Watling, Tulsa Court 1 6 Enej Bonin, Denver 8:00 7 Remi Boutillier, Fresno State 1:30 Court 5 8 Stephen Hoh, Illinois 10:00 9 Wil Spencer (5), Georgia 10 George Coupland, Mississippi State 10:00 11 Ryan Thacher, Stanford 2:30 12 Marcel Thiemann, Mississippi 9:30 13 Clay Thompson, UCLA 14 Roberto Maytin, Baylor 9:30 15 Mousheg Hovhannisyan (Q), Pepperdine 2:30 16 Peerakit Siributwong (Q), Oklahoma 10:30 17 Henrique Cunha (3), Duke 18 Ray Sarmiento, Southern California 10:30 19 Juan Spir, Georgia Tech 3:00 20 Costin Paval, Oklahoma 11:00 21 Gonzalo Escobar, Texas Tech 22 Patrick Kawka, BYU 11:00 23 Nick Andrews, California 3:30 24 James Chaudry (Q), Mississippi State 11:00 25 Jose Hernandez (8), North Carolina 26 Sebastian Fanselow, Pepperdine 11:00 27 Benedikt Lindheim (Q), Nebraska 3:30 28 Peter Kobelt, Ohio State 8:00 29 Roy Kalmanovich (Q), Illinois Court 6 30 Akash Muppidi, Boston College 8:00 31 Japie De Klerk, Tulsa 1:30 Court 2 32 Yannick Maden (Q), Clemson 8:00 33 Nelson Vick (Q), Ohio State Court 4 34 Christopher Aumueller, Nebraska 8:00 35 Guillermo Alcorta (Q), Oklahoma 1:00 Court 7 36 Nassim Slilam, Florida 9:30 37 Jonathan Pearlman, Harvard 38 Adrien Puget, UCLA 9:30 39 Malte Stropp, Mississippi State 2:00 40 Dennis Nevolo (6), Illinois 8:00 41 Brennan Boyajian, North Carolina Court 8 42
    [Show full text]