DOCSLIB.ORG

Scholarship, Hellenistic Peripatetic Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Scholarship, Hellenistic Peripatetic approach. Later sources mention two LIBRARIES, one in the royal palace and one FRANCESCA SCHIRONI outside of it (Tzetzes, Prooem. II,8–9 Koster). The latter was in the Serapeum and was During the Hellenistic period scholarship on perhaps established by PTOLEMY III EUERGETES Greek literary and non-literary authors devel- (246–222 BCE). oped greatly. For the first time in Greek history In order to promote scholarship the Ptole- a systematic effort to study, edit, and write mies pursued an aggressive policy of book exegeses (ranging from commentaries to lex- acquisition: apparently Ptolemy III had even ica) on the most representative Greek authors issued an order that all the books in the ships was carried out. This editorial and exegetical arriving at Alexandria had to be taken and cop- work (financed by several dynasties, especially ied; the originals would be kept and the copies the Ptolemies) is evidence that the Greek- returned to the owners (Galen, Comm. Hipp. speaking intelligentsia felt that the golden age Epidem. iii, 17a 605–8). Indeed, the Alexan- of Greece had come to an end and a great her- drian book collection was extensive, even if itage had been created, which needed to be res- the figures given by Tzetzes (Prooem. II,9–11 cued and protected. The work of Hellenistic Koster) – 42,800 books in the library in the Ser- scholars had a fundamental impact on the apeum and 490,000 books in the Royal Library – future preservation of Greek literature. Fur- are probably too large. Most likely the Library thermore, Hellenistic scholars, who were in also had books from cultures other than Greek; many respects the intellectual heirs of the Per- for example, the SEPTUAGINT, MANETHO, and per- ipatetic School, pioneered or further developed haps BEROSSOS were collected there. If indeed linguistic and metrical analysis, chronology, HERMIPPUS, a pupil of CALLIMACHUS, wrote a com- and lexicography, becoming the founders of mentary on Zoroaster (Plin. HN 30.4), then disciplines such as philology and literary even Persian texts might have been available criticism. at the Library. The scholars working at Alexan- With the establishment of the Hellenistic dria were most likely also attached to the kingdoms, royal policies of cultural promotion Museum. and PATRONAGE were developed. The best exam- The Royal Library was led by a head librarian, ple is the cultural patronage of the Ptolemies, appointed by the king to act also as a royal tutor who established the famous LIBRARY and in addition to his other duties. We know the MUSEUM of ALEXANDRIA and attracted intellec- names of the head librarians mostly through tuals from all around the Mediterranean. The entries in the Suda as well as from P.Oxy. historical sources for these institutions are 1241 (second century CE); the two sets of sources either very meager (the Museum) or difficult do not agree on the relative order of the librar- to reconcile with each other (the Library), ians and the dating of their tenure. Many solu- yet it is fairly certain that PTOLEMY I SOTER tions have been proposed, and the most widely (306–282 BCE) founded both of them, while accepted is the one offered by Fraser (1972: PTOLEMY II PHILADELPHOS (282–246 BCE) further I330–3): ZENODOTOS OF EPHESOS (ca. 285–270 developed them. Ptolemy I enrolled DEMETRIOS BCE), APOLLONIUS RHODIUS (ca. 270–245 BCE), ERA- OF PHALERON,aPERIPATETIC and pupil of THEO- TOSTHENES of Cyrene (ca. 245–204/201 BCE), ARIS- PHRASTUS, in this cultural project. Though TOPHANES OF BYZANTIUM (ca. 204/201–189/ Demetrios’ real contribution to the Library 186 BCE), Apollonios Eidographos (ca. 189/ and the Museum is difficult to assess (The Let- 186–175 BCE), Aristarchos of Samothrace (ca. ter of Aristeas § 9 says that he was in charge of 175–145 BCE). Eichgrün’s alternate ordering – the Royal Library, but this is most likely false), Apollonios Eidographos, Aristophanes of the learned work produced by the Alexandrian Byzantium, and Aristarchos – deserves serious scholars was definitely influenced by a attention (1961: 15–35). Besides the head The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Edited by Roger S. Bagnall, Kai Brodersen, Craige B. Champion, Andrew Erskine, and Sabine R. Huebner. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah30157 2 librarians, many other grammarians and philol- ALKAIOS, Anakreon, and possibly all the nine ogists were active there, among whom were the canonical lyric poets) was epochal. His poet-philologists LYCOPHRON, Alexander Aetolus, arrangement of PINDAR’S victory-odes in four and Callimachus. books according to the games at which the vic- The main achievement of the Alexandrian tory was achieved, as well as his work on lyric scholars of this period was the reorganization colometry with the division of poems accord- of the past Greek literary tradition and the pro- ing to lines and the triadic system (strophe, duction of standard editions (ekdoseis)of antistrophe, and epode), are still used today. Greek authors, which formed the basis of the Aristophanes of Byzantium also prepared an medieval tradition that we still use. They also edition of the Aristophanic comedies and per- wrote commentaries (hypomnemata)on haps also of MENANDER and the tragic poets. He ancient authors, lexica (lexeis) collecting liter- was probably also the first to use accents in his ary as well as dialectal or rare words, and editions to clarify the pronunciation and pros- monographs discussing particular literary ody of debated words. topics (syggrammata). Euphronios (end of third century BCE), the HOMER was the most studied author at Alex- teacher of Aristophanes of Byzantium, is the andria. At least three head librarians produced first Alexandrian scholar we know of to have an edition: Zenodotos, Aristophanes, and Aris- written a commentary (hypomnema), specifi- tarchos. The poet Rhianos of Crete, active at cally one on ARISTOPHANES’ Plutus (perhaps on Alexandria in the second half of the third cen- the basis of Lycophron’s edition). Commen- tury, also prepared editions of Homer, but it is taries on different authors were among the unknown whether he was connected with the most important results of Aristarchos’ scholar- Alexandrian court. From the fragments we ship; he authored hypomnemata on HESIOD, have, Zenodotos’ text was somewhat idiosyn- ARCHILOCHOS, Alkman, Pindar, AESCHYLUS, SOPH- cratic and seems to have been founded on an OCLES, Aristophanes, and perhaps BACCHYLIDES Ionian rhapsode’s text (West 2001: 33–45). and EURIPIDES. Prose authors were most pro- Aristarchos’ Homeric edition is particularly bably studied and commented upon even if important since it fixed a standard Homeric the evidence is scarce; however, a papyrus text in terms of number of lines, eliminating (P.Amherst 2.12) preserves the title of Aristarchos’ lines that were poorly attested. The Homeric hypomnema on HERODOTUS; Aristarchos might papyri confirm this: earlier Hellenistic papyri have also worked on PLATO (Schironi 2005). present a Homeric text different from ours, Even though the commentaries and editions with many additional lines, while those from of the Alexandrians are not preserved by direct 150 BCE onward offer the standard Homeric tradition, many fragments of their work have text we still use, proving that by that time Aris- been preserved by later sources such as scholia, tarchus’“selected” Homeric text had had an lexica, and other exegetical texts, as well as by impact on the book market. We also owe to papyri. This evidence has allowed scholars to the Alexandrians the division of both poems reconstruct at least in part the editorial and into twenty-four books. exegetical principles followed at Alexandria. Editions of other poets were also prepared at The Alexandrians invented and used the Alexandria. Under Ptolemy II, Alexander so-called critical signs (semeia), which were Aetolus edited tragedies and satyr plays and written in the margin of their editions and Lycophron of Chalkis edited comedies. Hesiod commentaries and had a specific meaning for and Pindar may have been first edited by the reader of those texts. The critical signs used Zenodotos and then by Aristophanes (who for Homer are those we know best. The obelos, considered the Shield spurious). In particular, a small horizontal line, was placed on the left of Aristophanes’ edition of the lyric poets (which the line which was considered spurious (an included not only Pindar, but also Alkman, operation called athetesis). The asteriskos (※) 3 indicated a line repeated elsewhere; the sigma findings to correct problematic passages within (C) and the antisigma ( ),C which were used the poems, either emending the text or athetiz- together, marked two consecutive lines of iden- ing lines which in his view had not been written tical content. To these signs, used by Zenodotos by Homer. Although this approach to Homeric (obelos) and Aristophanes (obelos, asteriskos, poetry was somewhat circular, it also was sur- sigma, and antisigma), Aristarchos added the prisingly scientific and rigorous, at least for that diple (>), used to highlight lines which were time (Schironi, forthcoming). considered noteworthy for various reasons Other scholarly genres were developed at (e.g., language, content, myth, style) and which Alexandria. Monographs on specific topics were were then discussed in the commentaries. Aris- popular among the Alexandrians from the very tarchos also introduced the diple periestigmene beginning. Zenodotos wrote a monograph on (>:) to highlight lines where he argued against the number of days covered in the Iliad and a Zenodotos (and perhaps also against Krates of Life of Homer. Apollonius of Rhodes wrote an Mallos). The combination of asteriskos with Against Zenodotos and monographs on Hesiod obelos (※ —) was used for repeated lines that and Archilochos; Callimachus authored an he wanted to athetize. A few other critical signs Against Praxiphanes (a Peripatetic scholar), in are known, the meaning of which is debated.
Recommended publications
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In

    Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In

    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
  • Tragic Noise and Rhetorical Frigidity in Lycophron's

    Tragic Noise and Rhetorical Frigidity in Lycophron's

    The Classical Quarterly (2021) 71.1 200–215 200 doi:10.1017/S0009838821000409 TRAGIC NOISE AND RHETORICAL FRIGIDITY IN LYCOPHRON’S ALEXANDRA* ABSTRACT This paper seeks to shed fresh light on the aesthetic and stylistic affiliations of Lycophron’s Alexandra, approaching the poem from two distinct but complementary angles. First, it explores what can be gained by reading Lycophron’s poem against the backdrop of Callimachus’ poetry. It contends that the Alexandra presents a radical and polemical departure from the Alexandrian’s poetic programme, pointedly appropriating key Callimachean images while also countering Callimachus’ apparent dismissal of the ‘noisy’ tragic genre. Previous scholarship has noted links between the openings of the Aetia and of the Alexandra, but this article demonstrates that this relationship is only one part of a larger aesthetic divide between the two poets: by embracing the raucous acoustics of tragedy, Lycophron’s poem offers a self-conscious and agonistic departure from Callimachus’ aesthetic preferences. Second, this article considers another way of conceiving the aesthetics of the poem beyond a Callimachean frame, highlighting how Lycophron pointedly engages with and evokes earlier Aristotelian literary criticism con- cerning the ‘frigid’ style: the Alexandra constructs its own independent literary history centred around the alleged name of its author, ‘Lycophron’. The article proposes that this traditional attribution is best understood as a pen name that signposts the poem’s styl- istic affiliations, aligning it not so much with the Ptolemaic playwright Lycophron of Chalcis but rather with Lycophron the sophist and a larger rhetorical tradition of stylistic frigidity. Ultimately, through these two approaches, the article highlights further aspects of the Alexandra’s aesthetic diversity.
  • Lycophron's Alexandra

    Lycophron's Alexandra

    New England Classical Journal Volume 45 Issue 2 Pages 92-108 2018 Lycophron’s Alexandra: “Restaging” the East-West Conflict Akira V. Yatsuhashi State University of New York, College at Oneonta Follow this and additional works at: https://crossworks.holycross.edu/necj Recommended Citation Yatsuhashi, Akira V. (2018) "Lycophron’s Alexandra: “Restaging” the East-West Conflict," New England Classical Journal: Vol. 45 : Iss. 2 , 92-108. Available at: https://crossworks.holycross.edu/necj/vol45/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CrossWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Classical Journal by an authorized editor of CrossWorks. New England Classical Journal 45.2 (2018) 92-108 Lycophron’s Alexandra: “Restaging” the East-West Conflict Akira V. Yatsuhashi State University of New York, College at Oneonta e f Stephanie West has likened Lycophron’s Alexandra to the modern novel stating that they share the same kind of “unstoppable imperialism… with its tendency to absorb imaginative literature of every sort.”1 In fact, Lycophron’s work appears to fold the world into 1500 iambic trimeter lines, condensing both the heroic and historical world of the Greeks and their respective conflicts with their “Asian” rivals into a grand narrative of epic scale. Because of its difficult language, its meter, and its theme of East versus West, the work is often likened to Aeschylus’ tragic works.2 Lycoph- ron’s poem, however, also evokes another key fifth-century figure in the shaping of the continental rivalry, Herodotus. The poem, in fact, culminates in its “Herodotean” narrative, two hundred lines that play upon and expand Herodotus’ Asian account of the conflict between Asia and Europe.
  • Print Version of a Contribution That Appeared in G. Colesanti-‐‑M. Gior

    Print Version of a Contribution That Appeared in G. Colesanti-‐‑M. Gior

    This is the pre-print version of a contribution that appeared in G. Colesanti-M. Giordano (eds.), Submerged Literature in Ancient Greek Culture, Berlin-Boston 2014, pp. 46-60 Beyond the canon: Hellenistic scholars and their texts Abstract My paper offers a survey of the surviving evidence on the genres and authors that were the object of study in Hellenistic times. Only a limited number of texts were systematically edited and commented on in the scholarly centres of Alexandria and Pergamum; this selection goes back to choices that were originally made in fifth- and fourth century Athens, in particular by Aristotle and his school. While the bulk of the Hellenistic scholars’ work was devoted to these works, there is nonetheless some documentation regarding their interest in minor authors, non-canonical genres and in contemporary poets as well. 1. Scholars, authors and genres In this paper I would like to offer some reflections on the role played by Hellenistic philologists in choosing and arranging the texts of Greek literature as we read them today, in particular on their choice of genres and authors to study and hand on to the succeeding generations of readers and scholars. In addition, in the second part of my paper, I shall try to show how texts belonging to “submerged” or “underground” genres, which were not the direct object of scholarly work in antiquity, do sometimes resurface as quotations or parallel passages in erudite works dealing with major authors, or in compilations with miscellaneous contents. The term ‘genre’ in itself, if we look back to the early stages of Greek literary production, can engender misunderstandings, since we have the tendency to apply to an archaic culture, which was still much more oral and aural than literate, the conventions of a later society when the written word prevailed.
  • Aristotle's Contribution to Scholarly Communication

    Aristotle's Contribution to Scholarly Communication

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2008 Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication Stephen Edward Bales University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Bales, Stephen Edward, "Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2008. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/475 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Stephen Edward Bales entitled "Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Communication and Information. J. Michael Pemberton, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Suzie Allard, Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon, Dwight Teeter Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Stephen Edward Bales entitled “Aristotle’s Contribution to Scholarly Communication.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Communication & Information.
  • Being the Treatises of the First Ennead With

    Being the Treatises of the First Ennead With

    Tufts College Library FROM THE INCOME OF THE SHIPMAN MEMORIAL FUND Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/ethicaltreatises01plot I f ; « li s’ I I V Oo dum 5l<5ipe 0(^ i on6fu\ tiA h-6ipe^nn, 1 nDoriin^id-Dpoc t)jiile-^i!;4-CU-iC tioni, Sciopin tTiAC-ennii. TIo'dUaij 1916. LOTINUS: THE ETHICAL TREATISES BEING THE TREATISES OF THE FIRST ENNEAD WITH PORPHYRY’S LIFE OF PLOTINUS, AND THE PRELLER-RITTER EXTRACTS FORMING A CONSPECTUS OF THE PLOTINIAN SYSTEM, TRANSLATED FROM THE GREEK BY STEPHEN MACKENNA CHARLES T. BRANFORD COMPANY BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS /1>.L % k95 ,E5 ,M-b v.l CONTENTS I'AQP. Porphyry’s Life of Plotinus ....... i THE BOOKS OF THE FIRST ENNEAD I. The Animate and the Man . .29 . II. On Virtue . • 41 III. Dialectic (or The Upward Way) . -.50 IV. On Happiness (or The Authentic Good of Life) . V. On Happiness and Extension of Time . -72 VI. On Beauty . *77 VII. On the Primal Good and its Secondary Forms . .89 VIII. On Evil, Its Nature and Source . .92 IX. On “The Reasoned Dismissal” ...... 108 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND EXPLANATORY MATTER Text, Previous Tr.\nslations . -113 Method of this Translation . .114 Commentaries ......... 116 Terminology ......... 117 The Divine Names ........ 118 The One .......... n8 The Intellectual-Principle ....... 119 The All-Soul ......... 120 The Divine-Triad as a Unity ....... 120 The Gods and Daimones ....... 121 • Man ; His Nature, Powers and Destiny ..... 121 Evil and Matter ........ 123 Morality ......... 123 The Term and the Way ....... 124 Minor Points of Terminology ....... 124 THE PRELLER-RITTER CONSPECTUS OF THE PLOTINIAN SYSTEM I.
  • Hellenistic Poetry Before Callimachus an Enquiry Into Two Lost Generations University of Liverpool, 14-15 June 2016

    Hellenistic Poetry Before Callimachus an Enquiry Into Two Lost Generations University of Liverpool, 14-15 June 2016

    Hellenistic Poetry Before Callimachus An Enquiry Into Two Lost Generations University of Liverpool, 14-15 June 2016 Ewen Bowie (Oxford) Pauline LeVen (Yale) School of the Arts Library Benjamin Cartlidge (Oxford) Enrico Magnelli (Florence) 19 Abercromby Square Martine Cuypers (TCD) Thomas Nelson (Cambridge) Marco Fantuzzi (Macerata) Maria Noussia (Thessaloniki) L69 7ZG Liverpool Lucia Floridi (Milan) S. Douglas Olson (Freiburg) Marco Perale Annette Harder (Groningen) Peter Parsons (Oxford) [email protected] Richard Hunter (Cambridge) Marco Perale (Liverpool) Guendalina Taietti Gregory Hutchinson (Oxford) K. Spanoudakis (Rethymno) [email protected] Jan Kwapisz (Warsaw) Guenda Taietti (Liverpool) Jan Kwapisz Rebecca Lämmle (Basel) Agnieszka Toma (Wrocław) [email protected] Hellenistic Poetry before Callimachus An international conference at the University of Liverpool 14-15 June 2016 You who walk past my tomb, know that I am son and father of Callimachus of Cyrene. You must know both: the one led his country’s forces once, the other sang beyond the reach of envy. Callimachus, Epigram 21 Pf., tr. F.J. Nisetich Callimachus’ epitaph for the tomb of his father is notorious for how perplexingly little it says about the deceased. We are told neither his name nor profession, whereas the name that resounds loud and clear is that of the author of the epigram. This is a measure of how Callimachus outshone his father. The Greeks may have found delight in being defeated by their children (cf. Pl. Mx. 247a), yet we are less impressed. Even for the sake of Callimachus himself, would it not be rewarding to know who his father was? The epigram illustrates the broader problem we have with the poet’s closest literary ancestors.
  • The Ideas As Thoughts of God

    The Ideas As Thoughts of God

    Études platoniciennes 8 | 2011 Les Formes platoniciennes dans l'Antiquité tardive The Ideas as thoughts of God John Dillon Publisher Société d’Études Platoniciennes Electronic version Printed version URL: http:// Date of publication: 1 November 2011 etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/448 Number of pages: 31-42 DOI: 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.448 ISSN: 2275-1785 Brought to you by Fondation Maison des sciences de l'homme Electronic reference John Dillon, « The Ideas as thoughts of God », Études platoniciennes [Online], 8 | 2011, Online since 16 December 2014, connection on 24 May 2017. URL : http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/448 ; DOI : 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.448 © Société d’Études platoniciennes The Ideas as Thoughts of God John Dillon Xenocrates’ Nous-Monad The precise origin of the concept of the Platonic Forms, or Ideas, as thoughts of God is a long-standing puzzle in the history of Platonism, which I am on record as dismissing somewhat brusquely in various works.1 I am glad to have an opportunity to return to it now, in this distinguished company.2 I propose to begin my consideration of it on this occasion by returning to the seminal article of Audrey Rich, published in Mnemosyne back in 1954.3 As you may recall, Rich’s thesis in that article was that the concept arose, whenever it arose – sometime in the early Hellenistic age, was her guess – as a reaction to Aristotle’s concept of the Unmoved Mover of Met. Lambda as an intellect thinking itself, and “a desire to reconcile the Theory of Ideas with the Aristotelian doctrine of immanent form” (p.
  • Gorgias: a Study of Oratorical Style Bromley Smith a a Bucknell University Version of Record First Published: 05 Jun 2009

    Gorgias: a Study of Oratorical Style Bromley Smith a a Bucknell University Version of Record First Published: 05 Jun 2009

    This article was downloaded by: [North Carolina State University] On: 06 December 2012, At: 14:49 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Quarterly Journal of Speech Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rqjs20 Gorgias: A study of oratorical style Bromley Smith a a Bucknell University Version of record first published: 05 Jun 2009. To cite this article: Bromley Smith (1921): Gorgias: A study of oratorical style, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 7:4, 335-359 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335632109379351 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/ terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. GORGIAS: A STUDY OF ORATORICAL STYLE BROMLEY SMITH Bucknell University ANALYSIS Life. Pedagogy, rhetorical. Content of courses.
  • May Plato's Academy Be Considered As the First Academic Institution?

    May Plato's Academy Be Considered As the First Academic Institution?

    Center for Open Access in Science ▪ https://www.centerprode.com/ojsh.html Open Journal for Studies in History, 2019, 2(2), 35-42. ISSN (Online) 2620-066X ▪ https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsh.0202.02035s _________________________________________________________________________ May Plato’s Academy be Considered as the First Academic Institution? Zhulduz Amangelidyevna Seitkasimova M. Auezov South Kazakhstan State University, KAZAKHSTAN Faculty of Pedagogy and Culture, Shymkent Received 8 November 2019 ▪ Revised 17 December 2019 ▪ Accepted 23 December 2019 Abstract Plato’s Academy is undoubtedly the first higher education institution in history, and in ancient Athens itself represents the most important educational institution. It constituted in the context of the universal development that took place in ancient Athens, in the 5th and 4th century BC, and it continued to work until the Byzantine Emperor Justinian forbade the work of all schools of philosophy (529 AD). This development, which is part of the so-called Golden Age of ancient Athens, represents the period of Greek history in which the foundations of Western civilization originated, as we know it today. Plato appears as one of the greatest philosophers of ancient Greece, along with Socrates and Aristotle, to the first of whom appears as a student and to the second as a teacher. Philosophy in the true sense of the word was created in Plato’s era in ancient Athens (Russell, 1975), and Plato’s Academy, in which he, along with his students, talked about various philosophical topics through the Garden of Akademos, was the impetus for this development. There are also opinions that the development of philosophy after Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle is only of reproductive character when it comes to the basics of philosophy.
  • S. R. Slings E 8934 2254)

    S. R. Slings E 8934 2254)

    S. R. SLINGS HERMESIANAX AND THE TATTOO ELEGY (P. BRUX. INV. E 8934 AND P. SORB. INV. 2254) aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 98 (1993) 29–37 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 29 HERMESIANAX AND THE TATTOO ELEGY (P.BRUX. INV. E 8934 AND P.SORB. INV. 2254) For Dirk Schenkeveld A newly published Brussels papyrus makes a join with an already published Sorbonne papyrus of Hellenistic elegy; we owe this splendid discovery to M. Huys1. The find confirms an intuition of Barns and Lloyd-Jones that the poem is about tattooing an adversary with various unedifying scenes from mythology - this had been contradicted with unscholarly fervour by Giangrande and K. Alexander2. At the same time, it refutes a conjecture of Lloyd- Jones', namely that this poem is the work of Phanocles: until Huys' discovery, it was possible to suppose that Phanocles fr. 1 Powell, which ends with the Thracian women being tattooed by their husbands because of their murdering Orpheus, was an aition preceding a Dirae type elegy saying 'I will tattoo you likewise'. But the Brussels papyrus is quite clearly the beginning of a poem (cf. especially i 3 mnÆ!ontai éoida¤), so this attribution has lost what plausibility it may have had before Huys' discovery. All the same, the identification of the author with Phanocles has influenced the general judgement of the author's standing to an extent which, to my mind, is hardly justified. Papathomopoulos, the author of the editio princeps of the Sorbonne papyrus3, had diagnosed the poet as a minor, provincial versifier of the Hellenistic period.
  • 2RPP Contents

    2RPP Contents

    2RPP The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad Francesca Schironi https://www.press.umich.edu/8769399/best_of_the_grammarians University of Michigan Press, 2018 Contents Preface xvii 1. Main Sources and Method Followed in This Study xix 2. Other Primary Sources and Secondary Literature Used in This Study xx 3. Content, Goals, and Limitations of This Study xxiii Part 1. Aristarchus: Contexts and Sources 1.1. Aristarchus: Life, Sources, and Selection of Fragments 3 1. Aristarchus at Alexandria 3 2. The Aristarchean Tradition and the Venetus A 6 3. The Scholia Maiora to the Iliad and Erbse’s Edition 11 4. Aristarchus in the Scholia 14 4.1. Aristonicus at Work 15 4.2. Didymus at Work 18 4.3. Aristonicus versus Didymus 23 5. Selecting Aristarchus’ Fragments for This Study 26 6. Words and Content in Aristarchus’ Fragments 27 1.2. Aristarchus on Homer: Monographs, Editions, and Commentaries 30 1. Homeric Monographs 31 2. Editions (Ekdoseis) and Commentaries (Hypomnemata): The Evidence 35 2.1. Ammonius and the Homeric Ekdosis of Aristarchus 36 2.2. Ekdoseis and Hypomnemata: Different Reconstructions 38 3. The Impact of Aristarchus’ Recension on the Text of Homer 41 4. Ekdoseis and Hypomnemata: Some Tentative Conclusions 44 Part 2. Aristarchus at Work 2.1. Critical Signs: The Bridge between Edition and Commentary 49 1. The Critical Signs (σημεῖα) Used by the Alexandrians 49 2RPP The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad Francesca Schironi https://www.press.umich.edu/8769399/best_of_the_grammarians viiiUniversity of Michigan Press, 2018contents 2. Ekdosis, Hypomnema, and Critical Signs 52 3.