Eco Cuencas Project Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí Basins Ing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BASINS AND FINANCIAL REDISTRIBUTION IN ACTION Consolidation of basin management, increasing resilience to the consequences of climate change and development of redistributive mechanisms, in support to the sustainable development in selected watersheds in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru Eco Cuencas Project Piracicaba, Capivari and Jundiaí Basins Ing. Phd. Antonio Eduardo Giansante BASIN CARACTERISTICHS 76 Municipalities ~5,5 Millions Inhabitants 2 ~15.000 km Campinas Urban Atibaia Rural 9 millions 3 and 11 L/s.km² 1.400 mm/year Piracicaba São Paulo Ecocuencas - UE 2 EXTREMES EVENTS IN FEW YEARS Flood - Atibaia City 2010 and 2011 - Cantareira: Full! Drought 2014 and 2015 Cantareira: Empty! Ecocuencas - UE 3 Water Abstractions PUBLIC SUPPLY 54% INDUSTRY 25% RURAL 19% OTHERS 2% Wastewater Discharges Treated or not! PROJECTIONS ON WATER USE Available Water (min. “flow”) Discharge abstraction BALANCE Source: COBRAPE, 2011 TRANSBOUNDARY BASINS PCJ Complexity of the PCJ Basins: depending on the situation of the watercourses, the law domain is State or federal (the ANA). Part of the springs is in the State of Minas Gerais and, therefore, run by State agencies, as well as the State of São Paulo in Brazil. Federal law is applied in others water courses that run from MG to SP. FEDERAL LAW 1997 1991 1994 Fonte: ANA, 2016. “PCJ” INSTITUCIONS - COMPLEXITY PCJ Committees – water Parliament that handle with different laws and interests: Federal and States (SP & MG) PCJ Agency of Water Basin – Non-profit foundation, handle to run policies of committees PCJ: one, but limited! PCJ Association– Membership association of Voluntary water users: former agency, now municipalities and industry representation And more 16 State and federal institutions Intricate! PCJ COMMITTEE ESTRUCTURE: INTEGRATION: BEST SOLUTION Source: Comitês PCJ (2012) Current management instruments Federal Legislation (1997) and States (SP- 1991 MG- 1994 ) License: States (SP e MG) and national (ANA) Procedures Charges: States (SP e MG) and national (ANA) not equal! cubic meter of water abstraction BOD kg R$ Operational Revenues (Total): Suffering effects of inflation Ecocuencas - UE 10 Comparison between supply services by water TARIFF and CHARGE for USE (m³) THAMES BASIN, GERMAN STATE OF BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG AND CAMPINAS AND ITATIBA MUNICIPALITIES Location Price of water Charging for the (%) Water use value on supplied (m³) use by m³ providing fare Thames Water Utilities 1,26 £/m³ 0,0400 £/ m³ 3,17% Baden-Württemberg 2,33 €/ m³ 0,0510 €/ m³ 2,19% Campinas 2,59 R$/m³ 0,0108 R$/m³ 0,41% Itatiba (operação 2,24 R$/m³ 0,0108 R$/m³ 0,48% Sabesp) Fontes: Thames Water Utilities (2015); Thames Water Utilities (2015); Versorgeportal Baden-Württemberg – Wasserpreise für Haushaltkunden (2013); SABESP (2016); SANASA (2015); AGÊNCIA DAS BACIAS PCJ (2016); DVGW (2015) BASIN PLAN: CHALLENGES Referred Programs (10 years) Value Planning Study and Database R$ 79.200.000,00 Management R$ 19.427.408,40 Recovery of water quality R$ 886.665.991,96 Conservation and protection of rivers R$ 383.460.000,00 Rational use of water R$ 1.036.949.322,78 Multiple use of water resources R$ 179.114.579,80 Prevention and protection against extreme hydrological events R$ 138.540.000,00 Technical training, environmental education and communication R$ 30.480.000,00 Total R$ 2.753.837.302,94 Total values collected from federal and state charges in PCJ from 2006 to 2015 Charges Historic Value (R$) Corrected Value (R$) Percentual States 133,540,141.04 177,176,784.29 45% Federal 161,387,484.94 220,125,459.16 55% Total 294,927,625.98 397,302,243.45 The total amount of historic value is about 10% necessary investment Fuente: COBRAPE, 2011 SOME PCJ QUESTIONS QUESTIONS CURRENT SITUATION INUNDATION Users and municipalities more vulnerable suffer more Alert System Insufficient No assurance Affected zone without official ways to help flooding zones DROUGHT No enough program to retain water in soil No enough program to maintain and restore vegetation Poor nutrients removal, therefore eutrophication (rivers too) Worse water quality in water courses, thus some water services can’t produce potable water PLAN No Emergency and Contingency Plan Without enough monetary resources to reach goals Ecocuencas - UE 13 ECOCUENCAS - PRELIMINARY POTENTIALITY FRAGILITY ECOCUENCAS REDISTRIBUTION EFFECT CONTRIBUTION Legislation Insufficient and inadequacy Adjustments Equity Planning Low adherence Supports on Plan review and Contribution to Municipalities on considering Flood and and users more vulnerable. Droughts situations Database Low compatibility Integration and systematize Knowledge and focus in weak users. Equity. Charges Update values Support study Economic equity. Who can more, pay more? Expand base of payment Support study. New users Economic equity. Change users attitude. New: nutrients Design of the charge Economic and environmental equity. Change attitude. Payment of Environmental Poor application Support study Downstream users pay upstream Services water producers in rural zone. Ecocuencas - UE 14 ECOCUENCAS Objectives: Support and develop mechanisms to increase the degree of PCJ basin management Network in watershed increases potential solutions and reduces costs Well-managed basin is more basin resilience to face the challenges of climate change Ecocuencas - UE 15 TO KNOW MORE PCJ BASIN AGENCY: www.agenciapcj.org.br PCJ COMMITTEE: www.comitespcj.org.br PCJ SITUATION ROOM: www.sspcj.org.br STATES E NATIONAL WATER GOVERNMENT: www.ana.gov.br www.daee.sp.gov.br www.cetesb.sp.gov.br www.semad.mg.gov.br Thank you for your attention This presentation has been realized with the financial support of the European Union. Contents of this documents belongs to the exclusive responsibility of the PCJ Agency, and should not be related to European Union’s position. 17 .