Document Provided by Latvia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Document Provided by Latvia CONFERENCE ON ACCESSION Brussels, 18 September 2001 TO THE EUROPEAN UNION -LATVIA- CONF-LV 56/01 ADD 3 Document provided by Latvia 20593/01 ADD 3 CONF-LV 56/01 ADD 3 1 EN ANNEX9 .. DIRECTIVE SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION AND FINANCING PLAN (Council Directive 1999/31/EC of26 Apri/1999 on the landfill ofwaste) Ministry ofEnvironrnental Protection and Regional Development Investment Department Republic of Latvia 16 July 2001 20593/01 ADD 3 CONF-L V 56/01 ADD 3 2 EN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Requirements of Directive 6 1.1.1 Article 4, Classes of landfill 6 1.1.2 Article 5, Waste and treatment not acceptable in landfills 6 1.1.3 Article 6, Waste to be accepted in the different classes of landfill 7 1.1.4 Article 7, Application for a permit 7 1.1.5 Article 8, Conditions of the permit 7 1.1. 6 Article 9, Content of the permit 7 1.1. 7 Article 10, Cost of the landfill of waste 7 1.1.8 Article 11, Waste acceptance procedures 8 1.1.9 Article 12, Control and monitoring procedures in the operational phase8 1.1.10 Article 13, Closure and aftercare procedures 8 1.1.11 Article 14, Existing landfill sites 8 1.1.12 Annex I, General requirements for all classes of landfills 9 1.1.13 Annex II, Waste acceptance criteria and procedures 9 1.1.14 Annex III, Control and monitoring procedures in operation and after-care phases 9 1.2 Summary of transition time required 9 2 STEPS REQUIRED FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION 10 2.1 Current status of practical compliance, legislative, institutional, gaps in implementation 10 2.1.1 Current status of practical compliance 10 2.1.2 Legislative and institutional gaps in implementation 10 2.2 To complete legislatin transposition 13 2.3 To complete institutional arrangements to comply with Directive's requirements 14 2.4 "Long list" of projects required to fully implement the Directive 14 2.4.1 Talsi, Janvari landfill 15 2.4.2 Riga, Getlini landfill 16 2.4.3 Liepaja, Grobina landfill 16 2.4.4 Ventspils, Pentuli landfill 16 2.4.5 North-Vidzeme, Daibe landfill 17 2.5 Balance between public and private investments needed 17 2.5.1 State budget, special budget and budget of municipalities 18 2.5.2 Bilateral and other donors 18 2.5.3 Loans 20 3 STRATEGY FOR IMPLEMENTATION 22 3.1 Context of the strategy: socio-economic issues and institutional factors 22 3.1.1 Socio-economic issues 22 3.1.2 Investments in environmental protection 22 3.2 Proposed scenario(s) for full implementation, and assumptions 23 3 .2.1 Legal transposition of requirements of the Directive 23 3 .2.2 Practical implementation of the directive 23 3.3 Roles ofvarious actors and responsibilities for investments 24 Landfill Directive Strategy (16-7-2001) 20593/01 ADD 3 CONF-LV 56/01 ADD 3 3 EN 3.3.1 Roles of various actors in management of municipal waste 24 3.3 .2 Responsibilities for investments 25 3.4 Institutional development plan 26 3.4.1 Preparation and start-up of data collection system 26 3.4.2 Preparation of waste management plans 27 3.4.3 Development of institutions in the scope of regional municipal waste management projects 27 3.5 Approach to project prioritisation and implementation 27 4 FINANCING COSTS OF IMPLEMENTATION 30 4.1 Estimated costs of implementation under selected scenario 30 4.2 Timetable for implementation 32 4.3 Annual costs over proposed period of implementation of investment capital, operation & maintenance costs 32 4.4 Sources of finance 32 4.5 Analysis of affordability on national, municipal and household levels 33 4.5.1 Analysis ofaffordability on national level 33 4.5.2 Analysis of affordability at household level 34 5 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 35 5.1 Key steps and assumptions 35 5.2 Short term, medium term and long term initiatives (including a short list of priority projects) 35 5.3 Time table for full implementation (target date and milestones) 36 5.4 Measures for supervising and monitoring implementation 36 5.4 .1 Overall measures 36 5.4.2 EU Phare and ISPA related measures 38 5.4.3 Supervision and monitoring ofEU funded projects 39 6 REFERENCES 41 ANNEX I TERMS OF REFERENCE "MULTI-YEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LATVIA" 43 ANNEX II SCHEME OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 51 ANNEX IIIUPDATED MSW-SCENARIO 1996-2012 52 ANNEX IV TOTAL INVESTMENTS BY SOURCES 1995-2012 54 Landfill Directive Strategy (16-7-2001) 20593/01 ADD 3 CONF-LV 56/01 ADD 3 4 EN 1 INTRODUCTION In its Position Paper of 8 November 2000 with the following Amendments of 23 May 2001, Latvia states the following about its position on the Landfill Directive (99/31/EC): Taking into account the foregoing, Latvia is changing its position and withdraws its request for transitional period on directive 99/31/EC on the landfill of waste and will achieve compliance or closure of the existing landfills until the date stipulated in Article 14 of the Directive. 70% of the population will be involved in the centralised municipal waste management system already by the year 2006, but all landfills will be in line with EU requirements till the middle of2009. Till this year aftercare and remediation activities will be finished for 50%. of the existing dumpsites and till2012 - for all existing dumpsites. As a justification, the following has been formulated: Establishment ofmunicipal waste landfills and waste collection system requires 340 million EUR (190 million LVL, 1EUR=0,56 LVL). It is foreseen to build 10-12 new municipal waste landfills and to place them in different regions ofLatvia. The transitional period is necessary to attract the investment and to-accomplish the procedures related to the chosen locations - EIA and consultations with public, that often prolongs the project implementation. In the Conference on Accession to the European Union- Latvia (21 February 2001), the EU reacts as follows on the Position Paper of Latvia: The EU takes furthermore note ofLatvia's request for a transitional period until 31 December 2015 under Directive 99/31 IEC on the landfill ofwaste. Since Latvia's request is not specified in its scope and not accompanied by an implementation plan the EU urges Latvia to provide information on transposition, and without prejudice to the question ofa transitional period, to reassess the scope and duration ofits request, taking into account the different deadlines set in the Directive for hazardous and non-hazardous waste and the particular importance ofappropriate management of hazardous waste. Furthermore, the EU invites Latvia to accelerate the establishment ofan implementation plan, including information on measures to ensure treating waste before landfilling, phasing out co-disposal ofhazardous waste and non-hazardous waste and controls over site­ closure and after care and to present it to the Conference, together with an implementation timetable, cost assessments and sources offinancing andfurther justification for the request. In addition, Latvia is invited to provide information on how it intends to avoid negative impact of possible future waste streams on the environment, including waste management. The reaction of the EU resulted in the preparation of this Directive Specific Implementation and Financing Plan (DSIFP) for the 99/31/EC with exception of the management of hazardous waste. The reasons to exclude hazardous waste from this DSIFP are the following: Hazardous waste management is State responsibility, and therefore does not involve so complicated institutional and financing schemes as is the case for the management of municipal waste; It is planned to develop only one h~ardous waste landfill. This cannot be compared to 10- 12landfills and improved waste management systems planned for municipal solid waste. 20593/01 ADD 3 CONF-LV 56/01 ADD 3 5 EN The most important institutional factor that influences the strategy for the implementation of Directive 99/31/EC is related to the municipalities as they will be ensuring the practical compliance with the requirements of the Directive. At the moment there are 561 municipalities which are responsible for the organisation of municipal waste management service in their administrative territories. Most of these municipalities have a small number of inhabitants and rather limited possibilities for the development of waste management plans. However it is planned to have an administrative territorial reform by the end of2002. This reform could certainly have a positive influence on the implementation of the Directive. The DSIFP ofDirective 99/31/EC contains an analysis ofthe requirements ofDirective 99/31/EC and relevant waste legislation of Latvia, the existing institutional structure, a strategy for implementing the Directive in Latvia, including the development of legislation and improvement of the institutional framework. 1.1 Requirements of Directive In this section, the requirements of the Directive on the Landfill of waste are presented per relevant article. 1.1.1 Article 4, Classes of landfill Distinction between landfills for hazardous waste, non-hazardous waste and inert waste. As indicated above the focus here will be on non-hazardous waste. 1.1.2 Article 5, Waste and treatment not acceptable in landfills Setting up a national strategy for the implementation of the reduction of biodegradable waste going to landfills (before 16 July 2003). The national strategy should include the following targets: Before 16 July 2006: reduction of biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills to 75% of the total amount (by weight) ofbiodegradable municipal waste produced in 1995 or the latest year before 1995 for which standardised Eurostat data is available; _ Before 16 July 2009: reduction of biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills to 50%; Before 16 July 2016: reduction of biodegradable municipal waste going to landfills to 35%.
Recommended publications
  • Sightseeing in Aizpute
    SIGHTSEEING IN AIZPUTE 9 Valda Jēriņa Dolls room 14 Weavers’ Studio 20 Centre of workshops and The exposition shows a collection “Kamolītis” residences “SERDE” WWW.VISITAIZPUTE.LV 1 Livonian Order Castle Ruins of dolls created by national theatre The workshop offers its visitors This set of historical buildings, with th The Livonian Order built the fortifications in the 13 century. In the actress Valda Jēriņa. There are more to see the process of different its creative ambience, welcomes – 113, 112 113, – Ambulance th 15 century, a residential house was built at its eastern wall, with than 500 thematically dressed dolls canvas being woven in the looms you to enjoy a variety of cultural – (+371) 26475143 (+371) – police municipal county Aizpute cellars and a gallery; thus the fortifications were turned into a castle. in the collection: dolls in national according to ancient methods tourism opportunities, art and – 110, 112, (+371) 63448192 (+371) 112, 110, – It served as a border fortification at police State costumes, school uniforms, theatrical and using traditional ornaments. cultural events (open in summer). the cross point of the territories of – 112 – and fantasy costumes. There is a Katoļu iela 1, Aizpute, Atmodas iela 9, Aizpute, departament Rescue and Fire the Livonian Order and the Bishop children’s playroom next to the (+371) 22847115 (+371) 29817180, of Courland (Latvian: Kurzeme). exhibition halls. Book your visit in advance. www.serde.lv EMERGENCY OF CASES IN CALL TO WHERE The river Tebra was the border: the Katoļu iela 1, Aizpute, (+371) 28617307 Bishopric on the right bank and the 21 “IDEJU MĀJA” (IDEA HOUSE) (+371) 25125190 (+371) Phone: Livonian Order on the left.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saeima (Parliament) Election
    /pub/public/30067.html Legislation / The Saeima Election Law Unofficial translation Modified by amendments adopted till 14 July 2014 As in force on 19 July 2014 The Saeima has adopted and the President of State has proclaimed the following law: The Saeima Election Law Chapter I GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Citizens of Latvia who have reached the age of 18 by election day have the right to vote. (As amended by the 6 February 2014 Law) 2.(Deleted by the 6 February 2014 Law). 3. A person has the right to vote in any constituency. 4. Any citizen of Latvia who has reached the age of 21 before election day may be elected to the Saeima unless one or more of the restrictions specified in Article 5 of this Law apply. 5. Persons are not to be included in the lists of candidates and are not eligible to be elected to the Saeima if they: 1) have been placed under statutory trusteeship by the court; 2) are serving a court sentence in a penitentiary; 3) have been convicted of an intentionally committed criminal offence except in cases when persons have been rehabilitated or their conviction has been expunged or vacated; 4) have committed a criminal offence set forth in the Criminal Law in a state of mental incapacity or a state of diminished mental capacity or who, after committing a criminal offence, have developed a mental disorder and thus are incapable of taking or controlling a conscious action and as a result have been subjected to compulsory medical measures, or whose cases have been dismissed without applying such compulsory medical measures; 5) belong
    [Show full text]
  • (UN/LOCODE) for Latvia
    United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LOCODE) for Latvia N.B. To check the official, current database of UN/LOCODEs see: https://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html UN/LOCODE Location Name State Functionality Status Coordinatesi LV 6LV Alsunga 006 Road terminal; Recognised location 5659N 02134E LV AGL Aglona 001 Road terminal; Recognised location 5608N 02701E LV AIN Ainazi 054 Port; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC 5752N 02422E LV AIZ Aizkraukle 002 Port; Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5636N 02513E LV AKI Akniste JKB Road terminal; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 5610N 02545E LV ALJ Aloja 005 Road terminal; Recognised location 5746N 02452E LV AMT Amata 008 Road terminal; Recognised location 5712N 02509E LV APE Aizpute 003 Road terminal; Recognised location 5643N 02136E LV APP Ape 007 Road terminal; Recognised location 5732N 02640E LV ARX Avoti RIX Road terminal; Recognised location 5658N 02350E LV ASE Aluksne 002 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5725N 02703E LV AUC Auce 010 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5628N 02254E LV B8R Balozi 052 Road terminal; Recognised location 5652N 02407E LV B9G Baldone 013 Port; Road terminal; Recognised location 5644N 02423E LV BAB Babite 079 Road terminal; Recognised location 5657N 02357E LV BAL Balvi 015 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5708N 02715W LV BAU Bauska 016 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5624N 02411E LV BLN Baltinava 014 Road terminal; Recognised location
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Natural Sacred Sites in Kurzeme Region, Latvia
    dating back to 1234 about enfeoffing of 25 acres of land 5 to the Riga St. Peter’s Church, was situated. The hill fort IN THE WAKE OF THE CURONIANS was located in the Curonian land of Vanema. The Mežīte Hill Fort was constructed on a solitary, about 13 m high Longer distances of the route are hill, the slopes of which had been artificially made steep- heading along asphalt roads, but 3 The CURONIAN HILL FORT er. Its plateau is of a triangular form, 55 x 30–50 m large, access to ancient cult sites mostly is OF VeCKULDīGA with a narrower southern part, on which a 3 meters high available along gravel and forest roads. Kuldīga 56º59’664 21º57’688 rampart had been heaped up. It used to protect the as- Long before the introduction of Christianity in cent to the hill fort, which, just like in many other Latvian Length of the route 145 km the ancient land of Cursa and expansion of the hill forts, was planned in such a way that when invaders 9 10 22 Livonian Order, on the present site of the hill fort of were striving to conquer the hill fort, their shoulders, Veckuldīga, at the significant waterway of the Venta unprotected by a shield, would be turned against the 21 has been observed: in the nearby trees, there have ancestors’ traditions are still kept alive by celebrating cult tree, its age could be around 400–500 years. River, one of the largest and best fortified castles of hill fort’s defenders.
    [Show full text]
  • Pavilosta Region
    PĀVILOSTA SAKA PARISH PAVILOSTA Ulmale, Akmeņrags, Saka, Rīva, Orgsaļiena, Saļiena, Strante VĒRGALE PARISH Vērgale, Ploce, Bebe, Saraiķi, Ziemupe REGION TASTY BEAUTIFUL EXCITING INTERESTING PEACEFUL ROMANTIC WINDY FUN SUNNY MUSICAL PECULI AR ACTIVE SILENT ARTISTIC HISTORIC AMBERFUL HARMONIOUS COMFORTABLE HOSPITABLE WONDERFUL RELAXING AT EASE IMMENSE USEFUL INFORMATION Police 110 Municipal police +371 29242320 Territorial area of Fire and Rescue Service 112 Pāvilosta region - 515km2 Pāvilosta Border Guard rescue boat +371 29332281 Pāvilosta - 6km2 Emergency Medical Service 113 Saka parish - 318km2 Gas Emergency Service 114 Vērgale parish - 191km2 General practitioner consultation phone +371 66016001 Inquiry services 1188 PLEASE NOTE! DO NOT ENTER THE DUNE ZONE! OBSERVE THE LAW ON THE PROTECTED ZONE! ATM DNB Nord Dzintaru iela 2, Pāvilosta Population of Pāvilosta region Swedbank Dzintaru iela 69, Pāvilostailosta as of 05.01.2018. - 2834 Pāvilosta - 996 POST OFFICE Tirgus iela 1, Pāvilosta, LV-3466, +371 63498149 Saka parish - 518 Veikalnieki, Vērgale, LV-3463, +371 634907599 Vērgale parish – 1320 PETROL STATION Ostmalas iela 8, Pāvilosta, +371 27467201 +371 63498417, [email protected] HEALTH AND SOCIAL CENTER, PHARMACY Lejas iela 10, Pāvilosta, +371 63498222 Vērgales veselības centrs, Vērgale, +371 63490981 GUIDE Irina Kurčanova +371 63498276, +371 29226273 – Pāvilosta, Sakas pagasts LV, RU Daina Vītola +371 29437166 – Ziemupe, Vērgales pagasts LV, RU Mirdza Sīpola +371 29338335 – Vērgale LV, RU, ENG PĀVILOSTA REGION MUNICIPALITY
    [Show full text]
  • Reisu Izpildes Var Kavēties Vairākos Maršrutos
    Reisu izpildes var kavēties vairākos maršrutos SIA Ogres autobuss Maršruta numurs Maršruta nosaukums Nr.5995 Ogre–Ciemupe–Glāžšķūnis–Ogre Nr.5414 Ogre–Suntaži–Līčupe Nr.6067 Ogre–Madliena–Līčupe Nr.6126 Ogre–Ogresgals–Lēdmane–Madliena–Ķeipene Nr.6095 Ogre–Turkalne–Suntaži–Kastrāne Nr.6117 Ogre–Ķegums–Birzgale–Lāčplēša stacija Nr.6122 Ogre–Suntaži–Ķeipene–Ogre Nr.6139 Ogre–Suntaži–Laubere–Madliena–Meņģele Nr.7073 Rīga–Madliena–Meņģele Nr.7229 Rīga–Pāvulēni AS Liepājas autobusu parks Maršruta numurs Maršruta nosaukums Nr.6726 Saldus–Satiķi–Saldus Nr.5016 Liepāja–Grāvīši Nr.5337 Liepāja–Dunalka–Cīrava Nr.5345 Aizpute–Priekule Nr.5347 Aizpute–Vecpils Nr.5348 Aizpute–Apriķi–Cīrava Nr.5349 Aizpute–Cīrava Nr.5964 Aizpute–Kazdanga–Cildi Nr.6300 Liepāja–Apriķi–Aizpute Nr.6768 Liepāja–Pāvilosta Nr.6801 Liepāja–Vecpils–Aizpute Nr.6813 Liepāja–Cildi Nr.6908 Liepāja–Ziemupe Nr.6916 Liepāja–Vecpils Nr.5112 Liepāja–Nīca–Otaņķi Nr.5340 Liepāja–Priekule–Aizvīķi Nr.5350 Liepāja–Priekule–Vaiņode Nr.5365 Liepāja–Priekule–Plūdoņi Nr.5950 Priekule–Bunka–Tadaiķi Nr.5951 Priekule–Krote–Tadaiķi Nr.5952 Vaiņode–Priekule–Krote–Tadaiķi Nr.5972 Priekule–Vienība Nr.5967 Priekule–Plūdoņi Nr.5968 Liepāja–Durbe–Vecpils Nr.6700 Liepāja–Vaiņode–Vībiņi Nr.6785 Liepāja–Šuķene Nr.6817 Liepāja–Vībiņi–Kalni Nr.6870 Liepāja–Bunka–Priekule Nr.6901 Liepāja–Jūrmalciems Nr.6902 Liepāja–Paplaka–Priekule Nr.6905 Liepāja–Kalēti–Priekule Nr.6907 Liepāja–Otaņķi–Nīcas centrs Nr.6910 Liepāja–Padone AS CATA Maršruta numurs Maršruta nosaukums Nr.5458 Saulkrasti–Vidriži–Limbaži Nr.7177 Saulkrasti–Cēsis–Madona
    [Show full text]
  • Tirgus Izpēte Preiļu Novada Investīciju Objektam Preiļu Muižas Komplekss Un Parks
    NORVĒĢIJAS FINANŠU INSTRUMENTA LĪDZFINANSĒTĀS PROGRAMMA LV07 „KAPACITĀTES STIPRINĀŠANA UN INSTITUCIONĀLĀ SADARBĪBA STARP LATVIJAS UN NORVĒĢIJAS VALSTS INSTITŪCIJĀM, VIETĒJĀM UN REĢIONĀLĀM IESTĀDĒM” PROJETS „REĢIONĀLĀS POLITIKAS AKTIVITĀŠU ĪSTENOŠANA LATVIJĀ UN REĢIONĀLĀS ATTĪSTĪBAS PASĀKUMU IZSTRĀDE” PASŪTĪTĀJS: Latgales plānošanas reģions IZPILDĪTĀJS: SIA „Konsorts” Tirgus izpēte Preiļu novada investīciju objektam Preiļu muižas komplekss un parks 2015 Saturs Ievads ................................................................................................................................... 4 Kopsavilkums ...................................................................................................................... 5 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 6 Резюме ................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Teritorijas apraksts ....................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Ģeogrāfiskais novietojums ....................................................................................... 8 1.2. Infrastruktūras nodrošinājums ................................................................................ 12 1.3. Investīciju objekta Borhu muižas Parka un Pils apraksts un foto ............................ 14 1.4. Borhu muižas Parka dabas pieminekļi ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Work Conditions and Risks in Latvia 2012-2013
    WORKWORK CONDITIONSCONDITIONS ANDAND RISKSRISKS ININ LATVIALATVIA 2012-2013 INVESTMENT IN YOUR FUTURE INVESTMENT IN YOUR FUTURE! WORK CONDITIONS AND RISKS IN LATVIA, 2012–2013 The Study “Working conditions and risks in Latvia 2012-2013” was carried out within the project “Practical application of the legislation regarding labour relations and occupational safety in sectors and companies” (No. 1DP/1.3.1.3.2./08/IPIA/NVA/002) with financial support of the European Social Fund of the European Union and the state of Latvia. Responsibility for the content of the research shall be borne by the Employers’ Confederation of Latvia, “TNS Latvia Ltd.” and Institute for Occupational Safety and Environmental Health of Rīga Stradiņš University (RSU DDVVI). Riga, 2013 SIA «TNS Latvia» & RSU DDVVI kroW snoitidnoc dna sksir ni ,aivtaL 3102–2102 RESEARCH GROUP The Study “Work conditions and risks in Latvia” within the project “Practical application of the legislation regarding labour relations and Occupational safety in sectors and companies” (No. 1DP/1.3.1.3.2./08/IPIA/NVA/002) with financial support of the European Social Fund of the European Union and the state of Latvia was carried out by a research group composed of the experts from “TNS Latvia Ltd.” and Institute for Occupational Safety and Environmental Health of Rīga Stradiņš University. Following specialists contributed to the Study: Ivars Vanadziņš, Žanna Martinsone, Svetlana Lakiša, Jeļena Reste, Mairita Grāvele, Mārīte Ārija Baķe, Dagmāra Sprūdža, Inese Mārtiņsone and Maija Eglīte. Quantitative surveys of employers, employees and general public, as well as analysis of focus groups were carried out by “TNS Latvia Ltd.” under the leadership of project director Signe Kaņējeva.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ESUKA – JEFUL 2017, 8–1: 41–59 INSIGHT INTO THE CITY/TOWN NAMES OF LATVIA Laimude Balode University of Helsinki, University of Latvia Abstact. The origin of place names is a research topic for linguists (or onomasticians) and geographers, but since ancient times a wide range of people have also been inter- ested in the subject. As Latvia is the closest neighbour to both Lithuania and Estonia, they share, to a large extent, a common history, as well as – because of this fact – a number of borrowed common words and names. This article is based on the toponym- ical material included in the short dictionary of Latvian geographical names entitled “No Abavas līdz Zilupei” (“From Abava to Zilupe. The origin of Latvian geographical names”), which was compiled by Laimute Balode and Ojārs Bušs and published in Rīga in 2015. It offers insights into the contemporary situation of Latvian oikonyms as well as providing comparisons of the names of inhabited places with their historical names. Keywords: onomastics, place names, Latvia DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2017.8.1.03 1. Introduction Today, Latvia has 9 cities and 67 towns (N=76) with town privi- leges. Naturally there are ancient cities, such as Rīga; founded in 1201, it has had town privileges since 1225. Other examples include Valmiera and Cēsis, which were granted town privileges in 1323, and Aizpute, Kuldīga, Ventspils, which were granted town status in 1378. In addition, Ludza was recorded in historical annals as early as in 1173, but town privileges were not granted until 1777. Then we must also consider the newest towns of Latvia: Jūrmala has been recognised as a town since 1956 and several inhabited places – Aknīste, Cesvaine, Ķegums, Pāvilosta, Saulkrasti, Seda, Stende, and Vangaži – were adjudged as towns in the first years of the second independence – from 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourist Officers in Latvia
    Tourist Officers in Latvia Kurzeme / Western Latvia Aizpute Tourist Information Centre Skolas iela 1, Aizpute, Liepāja district, Latvia, LV-3456 Phone: +371 29623284, +371 63448880 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.aizpute.lv Dundaga Tourist Information Centre Dundaga castle, Pils iela, Dundaga, Talsi district, Latvia, LV-3270 Phone: +371 63237858, +371 29444395 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.ziemelkurzeme.lv, www.dundaga.lv Durbe Tourist Information Centre Skolas iela 14, Durbe, Liepāja district, Latvia, LV-3440 Phone: +371 63498808 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.durbe.lv Embūte Ecotourism Information and Education centre Embūte, Liepāja district, Latvia, LV-3466 Phone: +371 26585221 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.embute.com Jūrkalne Tourist Information Centre “Krasti”, Jūrkalne parish, Ventspils district, Latvia, LV-3626 Phone: +371 63697131 Fax: +371 63697131 E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Home page: www.jurkalne.lv Kandava Tourist Information Centre Kūrortu iela 1b, Kandava, Tukums district, Latvia, LV-3120 Phone: +371 63181150, +371 28356520 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.kandava.lv Kolkasraga Information and Visitor Centre Kolkasrags, Kolka parish, Talsi district, Latvia, LV-3275 Phone: +371 26486622 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.kolka.info, www.kolka.lv Kuldīga Tourist Information Centre Baznīcas iela 5, Kuldīga, Latvia, LV-3300 Phone: +371 63322259, +371 29334403 Fax: +371 63322259 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.kuldiga.lv Liepāja District
    [Show full text]
  • SIA “Tukuma Auto” Apkalpotie Maršruti
    SIA “Tukuma auto” apkalpotie maršruti Tukuma un Saldus lote Iedzīvotājiem pieejamas: - mēneša biļete braucienam vienā virzienā darbadienās - mēneša biļete abos virzienos (turp un atpakaļ) darbdienās - abonementa biļete braucienam abos virzienos (turp un atpakaļ) visās mēneša dienās Attiecīgās biļetes pasažieriem nodrošinās atlaidi 20% apmērā. Abonementa biļeti var iegādāties: - Tukuma autoostā, Dzelzceļa ielā 2A, Tukumā (braucieniem Tukuma lotes maršrutos) - SIA “Tukuma auto”, Tūristu ielā 1, Saldū (braucieniem Saldus lotes maršrutos) Papildu informāciju par abonementa biļetes iegādes iespējām: - pārvadātāja e-pasta adrese: [email protected] - tālruņa numurs: 25629992; 29243537 Nr.pēc Maršruta kārtas Maršruta nosaukums numurs Lote 1. Jauntukums–MRS 3211 Tukums 2. Jauntukums–Tukuma lauktehnika 3212 Tukums 3. Durbe–Tukuma lauktehnika 3213 Tukums 4. Jauntukums–Ozoliņi 3215 Tukums 5. Tukums–Zentene 5161 Tukums 6. Tukums–Dzirciems–Zentene 5167 Tukums 7. Tukums–Lamiņi–Zentene 5168 Tukums 8. Tukums–Sēme 5179 Tukums 9. Kandava–Griepciems–Līgciems–Kandava 5183 Tukums 10. Kandava–Zemīte 5184 Tukums 11. Jaunpils-Rāvi-Jaunpils 5261 Tukums 12. Tukums–Džūkste–Lestene–Burtnieki 5296 Tukums 13. Džūkste–Pienava 5297 Tukums 14. Džūkste–Dzintarzeme 5298 Tukums 15. Tukums–Zemīte 5299 Tukums 16. Tukums–Engure 5543 Tukums 17. Kandava–Cēre 5544 Tukums 18. Tukums–Tume 5558 Tukums 19. Tukums–Praviņu skola 5562 Tukums 20. Kandava–Vāne–Koguļi 5740 Tukums 21. Kandava–Sabile–Matkule 5741 Tukums 22. Tukums–Sāti–Jaunpils 6031 Tukums 23. Tukums–Lapmežciems 6033 Tukums 24. Tukums–Engure–Bērzciems 6034 Tukums 25. Tukums–Degole–Viesatas 6035 Tukums 26. Kandava–Varieba–Vāne–Kandava 6037 Tukums 27. Tukums–Kukšas–Sautiņi–Abavnieki 6038 Tukums 28. Tukums–Zemīte–Vāne 6039 Tukums 29. Tukums–Jaunpils 6043 Tukums 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Region Sustainable Development Strategy 2030 Dundaga Municipality Ventspils Municipality Kurzeme
    KURZEME PLANNING REGION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2030 DUNDAGA MUNICIPALITY VENTSPILS MUNICIPALITY KURZEME ROJA MUNICIPALITY ALSUNGA MUNICIPALITY PĀVILOSTA MUNICIPALITY VENTSPILS CITY TALSI MUNICIPALITY MĒRSRAGS MUNICIPALITY GROBIŅA MUNICIPALITY LIEPĀJA CITY BROCĒNI MUNICIPALITY KULDĪGA MUNICIPALITY DURBE MUNICIPALITY PRIEKULE MUNICIPALITY NĪCA MUNICIPALITY The booklet is nanced by the Norwegian Financial Mechanism AIZPUTE MUNICIPALITY programme 2009–2014 No. LV 07 SKRUNDA MUNICIPALITY “Capacity-building and Institutional Cooperation between Latvian and Norwegian Public Institutions, Local and Regional Authorities” project No. 4.3–24/NFI/INP–002 “Increasing territorial development planning capacities of planning regions and local governments VAIŅODE MUNICIPALITY of Latvia and elaboration of development planning documents” SALDUS MUNICIPALITY RUCAVA MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY RUCAVA Local Governments of Latvia Kurzeme Planning Region Kurzeme is a unique region in the west of Latvia. It can be proud of the long and diverse coast of the Baltic Sea and important cultural and natural heritage. The widest waterfall in Ventspils Dundaga Municipality Municipality Europe – Ventas Rumba – is situated in the heart of Kurzeme. The landscape of the region keeps traces left not only by the Roja Suiti and Livs, but also by the Vikings. Chairwoman of Kurzeme Ventspils Municipality Planning Region City Historically, Kurzeme Region is known by its strong traditional Development Council Mērsrags economic sector (forestry, agriculture and shery) and manufacturing Municipality industry. The development of technologies and creative industries Inga Bērziņa also plays an increasing role. Ports are an important aspect in the Talsi Municipality development of the cities of national signicance – Liepāja and Ventspils. Kurzeme has three regional development centres – Kuldīga, Saldus and Talsi, and each of them has its own special signicance.
    [Show full text]