DOCSLIB.ORG

Title PROXEMICS in CROSS-CULTURAL CONTEXT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title PROXEMICS in CROSS-CULTURAL CONTEXT Title PROXEMICS IN CROSS-CULTURAL CONTEXT Author(s) Uza, Tokuyu Citation 沖縄短大論叢 = OKINAWA TANDAI RONSO, 10(1): 1-15 Issue Date 1996-03-01 URL http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12001/10668 Rights 沖縄大学短期大学部 PROXEMICS IN CROSS-CULTURAL CONTEXT Tokuyu Uza TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION I. DEFINITION OF PERSONAL SPACE II. PERSONAL SPACE VERSUS TERRITORY III. CULTURAL DIFFERENCES REGARDING PERSONAL SPACE IV. CREATION OF PERSONAL SPACE V. INTRUSIONS ON PERSONAL SPACE By People By Shapes By Animals VI. OCCASIONS REQUIRING ADEQUATE PERSONAL SPACE In Strict Privacy Bad Breath Or Body Odor Psychological Condition VII. OCCASIONS REQUIRING FORFEIT OF PERSONAL SPACE Vlll. OCCASIONS REQUIRING FORFEIT OF PERSONAL SPACE CONCLUSION REFERENCES - 1 - INTRODUCTION This paper is written for individuals who are going to foreign countries due to their business, education, family, and any other reasons which make them travel abroad. Every country has its own clutural differences. To understand this difference in culture is a puzzlement and frustration to people when and if they do not know how to manage the situation. To live in a different culture productively is like going through a maze without going back and forth. It may take time to find out which way is closer and easier, but once one finds on easy path, understands the rules, directions, and angles to get though the maze one will develop a thorough understanding of the maze. There are many things one ought to know when living in a foreign country. In this paper, we shall examine the subject of proxemics. Edward T. Hall who is the specialist in Personal Space has given the special name of proxemics to the study of space. (Tubbs, Stewart L, and Moss, Sylvia, 1980 p. 169). Proxemics are broad, therefore, it will be narrowed down to personal space. Every single person has their own personal space, but most do not realize that they have personal space even though they feel uncomfortable if someone invades their personal space. In this research we shall analyze the following: I . Definition of personal space, II. Personal space versus territory, III. Cultural differences regarding personal space, IV. Creation of personal space, V. Intrusions on personal space, by people, by shapes, and by animals,VI. Occasions requiring adequate personal space, in strict privacy, bad breath or body odor, and psychological condition,VII. Occasions !equiring forfeit of personal space, and VIII. Cultural adjustments to personal space. - 2 - I . DEFINITION OF PERSONAL SPACE. Edward T. Hall's perspective of communication is that; communication is a multichannel affair. Hall believes that just as language varies from culture to culture, so do the other interacting media. Specifically, proxemics refers to the use of space in communication. "Proxemics is the term I have coined for the interrelated observations and theories of man's use of space as a specialized elaboration of culture" (Hall, 1966. p.l). According to Hall (1963), another definition is that the proxemics is the study of how man unconsciously structures microspace and the distance between men in conduct of daily transactions, the organizations of space in his house and buildings, and ultimately the layout of his towns. Although this definition of proxemics is broad, most of the work in the area has been limited to the use of interpersonal space. Edward T. Hall and Mildred R. Hall (1985) said, every individual has around himself an invisible bubble of space that contracts and expands depending on several factors: his emotional state, psychological state, the activity he's performing at the time and his cultural background. This bubble is a kind of mobile territory that a person will defend against intrusion. Robert Sommer's (1969) concern is with personal space, "an area with invisible boundaries surrounding a person's body into which intruders may not come" (p.26). In effect, he says that the concept of personal space can be thought of as a person's portable territory, which each person carries along wherever he or she may go. Therefore, the personal space is the space that the individual has and that space is occupied by themselves. It is impossible to measure the presonal space because it is an "invisible, flexible bubble that surrounds us" (Hickson Ill, Mark L, and Stacks, p.40). - 3- II. PERSONAL SPACE VERSUS TERRITORY The main difference between the two is that the territory is uncarryable but visible, whereas, the personal space is carryable but invisible. Usually the term "territory" is used in geographical sense. The most important difference is that personal space is carried around while territory is relatively stationary. The animal of man will usually mark the boundaries of his territory so that they are visible to others, but the boundaries of his personal space are invisible. Personal space has the body at its center, while territory does not. (Sommer, 1969, p. 248) This is the most accurate definition and distinction between the personal space and the territory. In addition to Sommer's interpretation, anthropologist, Presley added "territory is a concept of a geographical location" (1990). III. CULTURAL DIFFERENCES REGARDING PERSONAL SPACE Psychologically, a person's space helps them to feel secure, private and comfortable by defining their distance from other people. This distance is different in each culture, for example: Two Venezuelan students had just been in trodused to an American woman in the cafeteria. As they talked to their new acquaintance, they stood very close to her. The woman kept moving away a few inches. They came closer, and she moved away again. When their conversation was finished, one of the students commented, 'She didn't seem very insterested in what we were saying, did she?' 'Maybe she was a littel afraid of us,' his friend said.( World Speak: "International Sleuth". 7) - 4- For these two Venezuelan students the personal space was not as large as that for the North American. Therefore, the two Venezuelan students were trying to approach to the point which is their personal space, but in order for them to gain or attain their personal space they had to break into the American's personal space. The North American desires to keep her personal space and if someone who does not have a close relationship with her approaches, she will move away to keep her personal space. The problem is that they have enculturated defferent concepts and values of personal space. These two variables are not tought in school, but are something that individuals acquire through their own clutures. On the other hand, target cultre can be acculturated. According to Fraida and Elite: Culture learning is a natural process in which human beings internalize the knowledge needed to function in a societal group. It may occur in the native context as enculturation or in a non-native or secondary context as acculturation. Fundamentally, learning a first culture is a process of indoctrination. Enculturaion builds a sense of cultural or social indentity, a network of values and beliefs, patterned ways of living, and, for the most part, ethnocentrism, or belief in the power and the rightness of native ways. Acculturation, on the other hand, involves the process of pulling out the world view or ethos of first culture, learning new ways of meeting old problems and shedding ethnocentric evaluations. (1990, p. 55) This means that an individual's behavior reflects one's way of living. In addition, Fraida and Elite, Ryan and Cooper (1984) defines how culture influences individual's behavior in everyday life: By culture we mean the system of norms and standards that a society - 5- develops over the course of many generations and that profoundly influences the everyday behavior of people in the society. More simply, culture is as people do. (p.l51) This phrase states that people will behave differently in different countries: If there was an international meeting with people who do not know about personal space, there will be a misunderstanding and pressure by their need for personal space. "That most people do not know what they are doing with their bodies when they are talking" (P. Ekman and W. V. Friesen, 183). According to Littlejohn (1989), "American culture utilizes four discernible distances: intimate (0 to 18 inches), personal (11/2 to 4 feet), social (4 to 12 feet), public (over 12 feet)" (p.64). The use of personal space is the most noticeable behavior in cross·cultural meeting. IV. CREATION OF PERSONAL SPACE The following represents one example of the techniques of how individuals create personal space not only in the library but also in the office, restaurant, and airport. A person can sprawl out, resting his legs on the chair next to him. If he gets up from the table, he may "reserve" his place by spreading out his books and papers or leaving a jacket draped over the chair he was sitting in. How far you go in defending your personal space will depend, of course, on both your personality and your communication style. If you sit too close to me in the library, I may get up and move. But reverse our roles and it's possible you might glare at me and even spread out your notebooks and papers so that they take up a good part of the table" (Tubbs, Stewart L, and Moss, Sylvia, 1980 p. 173). - 6- This manner of creating personal space is easier for most people because they can make preparation before someone tries to invade his/her territory. Yet, after they have encountered someone's innovation to the territory, it is too late to spread out their notebooks and papers. However, if they had the same concept of personal space, they would not have to worry at all, but if they did not have the same cultural concept of personal space they may suffer trying to keep their own intact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before the Consummation What? on the Role of the Semiotic Economy of Seduction
    Continuum Journal of Media & Cultural Studies ISSN: 1030-4312 (Print) 1469-3666 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ccon20 Before the consummation what? On the role of the semiotic economy of seduction George Rossolatos To cite this article: George Rossolatos (2016): Before the consummation what? On the role of the semiotic economy of seduction, Continuum To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1141866 Published online: 18 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ccon20 Download by: [Goerge Rossolatos] Date: 19 February 2016, At: 02:29 CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1141866 Before the consummation what? On the role of the semiotic economy of seduction George Rossolatos Department of English, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The cultural practice of flirtation has been multifariously scrutinized in Received 21 March 2015 various disciplines including sociology, psychology, psychoanalysis and Accepted 17 December 2015 literary studies. This paper frames the field of flirtation in Bourdieuian terms, while focusing narrowly on the semiotic economy that is defining of this KEYWORDS cultural field. Moreover, seduction, as a uniquely varied form of discourse Habitus; cultural field; that is responsible for producing the cultural field of flirtation, is posited as semiotics; flirtation; seduction; semiotics the missing link for understanding why flirtation may be a peculiar case of non-habitus, contrary to the received notion of cultural field as set of goal- oriented practices and actionable habituses.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalizing on Negative Feedback Christopher Edward Anderson University of Montana, Missoula
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2019 Making the Most of People We Do Not Like: Capitalizing on Negative Feedback Christopher Edward Anderson University of Montana, Missoula Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Interpersonal and Small Group Communication Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Christopher Edward, "Making the Most of People We Do Not Like: Capitalizing on Negative Feedback" (2019). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11466. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11466 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MAKING THE MOST OF PEOPLE WE DO NOT LIKE: CAPITALIZING ON NEGATIVE FEEDBACK By CHRISTOPHER EDWARD ANDERSON Bachelor of Arts in Psychology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana in 2011 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication Studies, Interpersonal Communication The University of Montana Missoula, MT Fall 2019 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Stephen Yoshimura, Chair Communication Studies Dr. Christina Yoshimura Communication Studies Dr. Lucian Gideon Conway, III Psychology 1 Anderson, Christopher M.A., Fall 2019 Communication Studies Making the Most of People We Do Not Like: Capitalizing on Negative Feedback Chairperson: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dance As Communication: Messages Sent and Received Through Dance
    Peick UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research VIII (2005) Dance as Communication: Messages Sent and Received Through Dance Melissa Peick Faculty Sponsor: Rhonda Knox, Department of Communication Studies ABSTRACT The purpose of this research was to examine the nonverbal communication of dance among individuals in a social setting. The research interpreted the messages that were sent and received between individuals while socially dancing. Specifically, this research studied dance in a naturalistic setting. Nonverbal codes of proxemics, haptics, and kinesics were observed and recorded. In addition, focus groups were conducted to see how the phenomena of nonverbal messages in dance are sent and received. As a result of both observations and focus groups, it was concluded that many different messages are being sent while dancing. These nonverbal messages were subsumed into categories which included: confidence, not interested, disrespect, having a good time, flirting, attention, and attraction. DANCE AS COMMUNICATION: MESSAGES SENT AND RECEIVED THROUGH DANCE Social dance remains unexplored involving nonverbal messages sent and received while dancing. The majority of research done regarding dance has been studied in the contexts of dance classes, self-esteem of children, cultural and sexuality. Previously, little to no research has been done in the context of dance in a social setting. The research I will be conducting involves examining the nonverbal communication of dance among individuals in a social setting. The purpose of this research was to gain an understanding of message-related behavior, to explain how dance is a communicative phenomenon, and how dance is used to send and receive messages through nonverbal behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Four Proxemic Zones on the Performance of Selected Sixth-, Seventh-, and Eighth-Grade Students" (1978)
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works August 1978 The ffecE ts of Four Proxemic Zones on the Performance of Selected Sixth-, Seventh-, and Eighth-grade Students Joseph F. Miller East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Joseph F., "The Effects of Four Proxemic Zones on the Performance of Selected Sixth-, Seventh-, and Eighth-grade Students" (1978). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2864. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2864 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s}*'. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Mediation Communication and Changing Expectations of Romantic Couples Samantha F
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2018 Computer-mediation Communication and Changing Expectations of Romantic Couples Samantha F. Quinn University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Quinn, Samantha F., "Computer-mediation Communication and Changing Expectations of Romantic Couples" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 1902. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1902 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND CHANGING EXPECTATIONS OF ROMANTIC COUPLES by Samantha Forbes Quinn A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication at University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee May 2018 ABSTRACT COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND CHANGING EXPECTATIONS OF ROMANTIC COUPLES by Samantha F. Quinn The University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, 2018 Under the Supervision of Assistant Professor Erin Ruppel Due to the complexity of romantic relationships and the integration of new communication technologies into relationship maintenance, the present study uses expectancy violations theory (EVT) to examine expectations, expectancy violations, and the changing expectations of romantic couples when using computer-mediated communication (CMC; i.e., social media websites, email, text messaging, etc.). Additionally, the study investigates the impact of changing expectations on relational quality. Twenty-five individuals were interviewed using a semi-structured interview protocol. The interviews were analyzed according to Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step approach for thematic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptual Models of Human-Robot Proxemics
    Perceptual Models of Human-Robot Proxemics Ross Mead and Maja J Matari´c Interaction Lab, Computer Science Department, University of Southern California, 3710 McClintock Avenue, RTH 423, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0781 {rossmead,mataric}@usc.edu http://robotics.usc.edu/interaction Abstract. To enable socially situated human-robot interaction, a robot must both understand and control proxemics—the social use of space— to employ communication mechanisms analogous to those used by hu- mans. In this work, we considered how proxemic behavior is influenced by human speech and gesture production, and how this impacts robot speech and gesture recognition in face-to-face social interactions. We con- ducted a data collection to model these factors conditioned on distance. This resulting models of pose, speech, and gesture were consistent with related work in human-human interactions, but were inconsistent with related work in human-human interactions—participants in our data col- lection positioned themselves much farther away than has been observed in related work. These models have been integrated into a situated au- tonomous proxemic robot controller, in which the robot selects interagent pose parameters to maximize its expectation to recognize natural human speech and body gestures during an interaction. This work contributes to the understanding of the underlying pre-cultural processes that govern human proxemic behavior, and has implications for the development of robust proxemic controllers for sociable and socially assistive robots sit- uated in complex interactions (e.g., with multiple people or individuals with hearing/visual impairments) and environments (e.g., in which there is loud noise, reverberation, low lighting, or visual occlusion).
    [Show full text]
  • Proxemics & Social Navigation
    Proxemics & Social Navigation <Reid Simmons> Illah Nourbakhsh HRI: Proxemics1 Simmons, Nourbakhsh : Spring 2016 Team ordering for first presentation • Day 1 (3 February, Wednesday) • Day 2 (8 February, Monday) HRI: Proxemics2 Simmons, Nourbakhsh : Spring 2016 1 Proxemics • “Interrelated observations and theories of [hu]man’s use of space as a specialized elaboration of culture” [Hall, 1966] HRI: Proxemics3 Simmons, Nourbakhsh : Spring 2016 Personal Spaces for Social Interaction acquaintances, lectures, strangers theater lovers, family, friends, children, small groups close friends HRI: Proxemics4 Simmons, Nourbakhsh : Spring 2016 2 Personal Space • Feel uncomfortable if others within personal space – “egg-shaped,” with more space in front – Exact size is culturally determined HRI: Proxemics5 Simmons, Nourbakhsh : Spring 2016 Measurement of Personal Space • Break into your teams • Create an NxN matrix of names • One person approaches second person face on, until first person begins to feel uncomfortable • Third person measures from nose to nose • Fourth person records distance (in inches) • Switch off until every person has approached every other person • Analyze for (a) consistency of each person (b) consistency across group • What factors can explain any differences? HRI: Proxemics6 Simmons, Nourbakhsh : Spring 2016 3 Factors Affecting Personal Space • Interpersonal Relationships • Gender • Culture Lewis Model of Cultural Types – Cool and decisive (US, Germany) – Accommodating and non- confrontational (China, Japan) – Warm and impulsive
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Cultural Communication for Leaders
    CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION FOR LEADERS By Dr. Merlin Switzer Switzer, Merlin. “Cross-Cultural Communication for Leaders,” EPPC Global Management , March 2009, http://www.eppcmanagement.com/home.asp . Imagine being a leader in a culture very different from yours with a people whose life experience and perspective is radically different. Such was the experience of Don Brewster who gave up a comfortable position as an executive pastor in a mega-church to move to Cambodia where he and his wife started Rahab’s House (www.aim4asia.org), a recovery home for girls rescued from sexual exploitation and slavery…girls sold by their parents to brothels or kidnapped and forced into submission. As Brewster worked with Cambodian staff, he asked their opinions, trusting their responses, to navigate through cultural differences. What he found was that his staff had an “inability…to say, “’No’ to me even when I was wrong.” Over the next two to three years, as he worked with his staff and learned more about the culture, things significantly improved. What Brewster didn’t fully understand were two important cultural differences. First, loyalty to one’s supervisor is highly valued, so when he asked his staff a question they responded by telling him what they thought he wanted to hear. Second, was the notion of saving face, common in many Asian cultures. When Brewster was wrong, his staff members were reluctant to tell him he was wrong, because they didn’t want to cause him to lose face…even though he asked for their input. This article identifies some of the leadership challenges leaders, like Brewster, are apt to encounter in cross-cultural communication and how to prepare to deal with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Proxemics in Human-Computer Interaction
    Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 13452 Proxemics in Human-Computer Interaction Edited by Saul Greenberg1, Kasper Hornbæk2, Aaron Quigley3, Harald Reiterer4, and Roman Rädle4 1 University of Calgary, CA, [email protected] 2 University of Copenhagen, DK, [email protected] 3 University of St Andrews, GB, [email protected] 4 Universität Konstanz, DE, [Harald.Reiterer,Roman.Raedle]@uni-konstanz.de Abstract In 1966, anthropologist Edward Hall coined the term “proxemics.” Proxemics is an area of study that identifies the culturally dependent ways in which people use interpersonal distance to understand and mediate their interactions with others [1]. Recent research has demonstrated the use of proxemics in human-computer interaction (HCI) for supporting users’ explicit and implicit interactions in a range of uses, including remote office collaboration, home entertainment, and games. One promise of proxemics is the realization of context-aware environments, which have been extensively pursued since Mark Weiser’s seminal paper, “The computer for the 21st century,” written in 1991. However, the potential of proxemics in HCI is still underexplored and many research questions remain unanswered. With the growing interest in using proxemics, we organized the Dagstuhl Seminar 13452 on the topic. “Proxemics in Human-Computer Interaction,” was held from November 3–8, 2013, and it brought together established experts and young researchers from fields particularly relevant to Proxemic Interactions, including computer science, social science, cognitive science, and design. Through an open keynote, mini talks, brainstorming, and discussion in breakout sessions, seminar attendees identified and discussed challenges and developed directions for future research of proxemics in HCI.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonverbal Communication in German-Albanian Cultural Contrast
    SAKARYA UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION Original Research Doi:10.19126/suje.689503 Received: 18.02.2020 Accepted: 12.04.2020 Published: 15.04.2020 April 2020• 10(1) • 187-201 Nonverbal Communication in German-Albanian Cultural Contrast Brikena KADZADEJ* Vjosa HAMİTİ** azar 1* Abstract. This article explores the nonverbal communication by comparing the cultural features of Albanian (in Albania and Kosovo) and German cultures; also comparing the inter-cultural features in Albania and Kosovo, respectively. The human communication is beyond language: nonverbal communication includes all kinds of human behavior that are not strictly linguistic but convey meaning, i.e., a set of behaviors (e.g., gestures) with a specific referential value and a function. We focus on seven of the most important channels of nonverbal communication in a contrastive Albanian-German perspective: proxemics, eye contact, facial expressions, body language, touching, physical appearance, the extra-linguistic field. The field of nonverbal communication is often considered inferior in relation to verbal communication (comprised of language habits, grammar, lexicon, etc.). Although communication between members of two different cultures requires the knowledge of a foreign language, their communication actually begins before any words are uttered. Keywords: Nonverbal Communication, extra-linguistic, Albanian, German, culture * Orcid id: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6293-5299, Prof. Dr., University of Tirana. Faculty of Foreign Languages, Department of German Language, [email protected] ** (Corresponding author) Orcid id: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-516X, Prof. Ass. Dr., University of Prishtina “Hasan Prishtina”, Faculty of Philology, Department of German Language and Literature, [email protected] * Unvan, Kurum, Eposta Kadzadej, B., & Hamiti, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing Proxemics in the Perspective of Collectivism Societies (Study of Residents of Riverbank Relocation in Vertical Settlements in Jakarta)
    Reframing Proxemics in the Perspective of Collectivism Societies (Study of Residents of Riverbank Relocation in Vertical Settlements in Jakarta) Melati Mediana Tobing1; Ilya Revianti2; Endah Triastuti3 1 Lecturer, Christian University of Indonesia; Doctoral Candidate, University of Indonesia 2 Lecturer, University of Indonesia 3 Lecturer, University of Indonesia Abstract Most of Asian use mutual cooperation to run their life in the challenging environment. On the riverbanks of Ciliwung in Jakarta, the Kampung Pulo’s people work together facing of the floods that inundated their roof for days, and feel comfortable living in this area until the rest of their lives. However, this area may cause some disasters for the city and should be revitalised. While developing a metropolitan city, the city planner use vertical occupancy as a solution to relocate residents from slums. This action may change people perception in understanding the meaning of space and distance, also the relations between citizens in this settlement. The elevator, closing doors, the lack of bench and terrace to sit in front of their house, are destructives this collectivistic people in interacting and sharing information. Suddnely, the citizens must be adapt this newly-modern residential boxes, which are assumed as the more efficient and economical and common use for the individualistic society. This paper are based on a research about how this local residents in Jakarta use space and distance for communicating in their new vertical space, through the method of interviewing and observing. This research applies an observation methodology while using an interviewing technique to collect data. The informant was born in Kampung Pulo and living in a rental housing belongs to the city government in Jatinegara Barat, East of Jakarta.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Understanding Social Cues and Signals in Human–Robot Interaction: Effects of Robot Gaze and Proxemic Behavior
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 27 November 2013 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859 Toward understanding social cues and signals in human–robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior Stephen M. Fiore 1,2*,Travis J. Wiltshire 2 , Emilio J. C. Lobato 2 , Florian G. Jentsch 2,3,Wesley H. Huang 4 and Benjamin Axelrod 4 1 Department of Philosophy, Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 2Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 3Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 4iRobot Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA Edited by: As robots are increasingly deployed in settings requiring social interaction, research is Serge Thill, University of Skövde, needed to examine the social signals perceived by humans when robots display certain Sweden social cues. In this paper, we report a study designed to examine how humans interpret Reviewed by: social cues exhibited by robots. We first provide a brief overview of perspectives from social Adam Goodie, University of Georgia, USA cognition in humans and how these processes are applicable to human–robot interaction Boris Duran, Italian Institute of (HRI). We then discuss the need to examine the relationship between social cues and Technology and University of Genova, signals as a function of the degree to which a robot is perceived as a socially present Italy agent. We describe an experiment in which social cues were manipulated on an iRobot *Correspondence: AvaTM mobile robotics platform in a hallway navigation scenario. Cues associated with Stephen M. Fiore, Department of Philosophy, Cognitive Sciences the robot’s proxemic behavior were found to significantly affect participant perceptions of Laboratory, Institute for Simulation the robot’s social presence and emotional state while cues associated with the robot’s and Training, University of Central gaze behavior were not found to be significant.
    [Show full text]