DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1602.03144V2 [Math.RT]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1602.03144V2 [Math.RT] REGULAR SUPERCUSPIDAL REPRESENTATIONS Tasho Kaletha Abstract We show that, in good residual characteristic, most supercuspidal rep- resentations of a tamely ramified reductive p-adic group G arise from pairs (S,θ), where S is a tame elliptic maximal torus of G, and θ is a character of S satisfying a simple root-theoretic property. We then give a new expres- sion for the roots of unity that appear in the Adler-DeBacker-Spice charac- ter formula for these supercuspidal representations and use it to show that this formula bears a striking resemblance to the character formula for dis- crete series representations of real reductive groups. Led by this, we explic- itly construct the local Langlands correspondence for these supercuspidal representations and prove stability and endoscopic transfer in the case of toral representations. In large residual characteristic this gives a construc- tion of the local Langlands correspondence for almost all supercuspidal representations of reductive p-adic groups. CONTENTS 1 Introduction 3 2 Notation and assumptions 10 2.1 Assumptions on the ground field . 10 2.2 Furthernotation............................ 11 3 Regularsupercuspidalrepresentations 12 3.1 Basics on p-adictori.......................... 12 3.2 Reviewofstableconjugacyoftori. 16 3.3 Shortremarksaboutparahoricsubgroups . 18 arXiv:1602.03144v2 [math.RT] 21 Mar 2017 3.4 Regular supercuspidal representations of depth zero . ..... 18 3.4.1 Maximally unramified elliptic maximal tori . 18 3.4.2 Depthzerocharacters . 22 3.4.3 Definition and construction . 24 3.4.4 Anextensionanditscharacter . 25 3.4.5 Classification ......................... 30 3.5 ReviewoftheworkofHakimandMurnaghan . 31 AMS 2010 Mathematics subject classification: 22E50; 11S37; 11F70. This research is supported in part by NSF grant DMS-1161489 and a Sloan Fellowship. 1 3.6 Tameregularellipticpairs . 35 3.7 Howefactorization .......................... 39 3.8 Classification of regular supercuspidal representations ..... 43 3.9 When p divides |π1(Gder)| ...................... 45 4 The character formula 46 4.1 Hypotheses .............................. 46 4.2 Reviewoforbitalintegrals . 47 4.3 Review of the work of Adler-Spiceand DeBacker-Spice . .. 47 4.4 Charactervaluesatshallowelements. 49 4.5 Computation of ordx(α) ....................... 50 abs 4.6 Definition of ∆II ........................... 54 4.7 A formula for ǫs,r · e˜ ......................... 56 4.8 The characters of toral supercuspidal representations ...... 60 4.9 Character values of regular supercuspidal representations at shal- lowelements:depthzero. 60 4.10 Character values of regular supercuspidal representations at shal- lowelements:generaldepth. 63 4.11 Comparison with the characters of real discrete series represen- tations ................................. 65 5 Regular supercuspidal L-packets 67 5.1 Admissibleembeddings . 68 5.2 Construction of L-packets ...................... 68 5.3 Parameterization of L-packets.................... 79 5.4 Comparison with the case of real groups . 80 6 Toral L-packets 81 6.1 Constructionandexhaustion . 81 6.2 Charactersandgenericity . 83 6.3 Stabilityandtransfer . 85 References 90 2 1 INTRODUCTION This paper pursues multiple interconnected goals, all of which are related to Yu’s construction of supercuspidal representations of reductive p-adic groups [Yu01], which generalizes Adler’s earlier construction [Adl98]. Recall briefly that if G is a connected reductive group over a p-adic field F that splits over a tamely ramified extension of F , a supercuspidal representation of G(F ) can be constructed by giving the following data: a tower G0 ⊂ ··· ⊂ Gd = G of connected reductive subgroups that become Levi subgroups of G over some i × tame Galois extension of F , a sequence of characters φi : G (F ) → C for all i ≥ 0 satisfying a certain genericity condition, and a depth-zero supercuspi- 0 dal representation π−1 of G (F ), which we may call the socle of the Yu-datum. Representations obtained from this construction are customarily called tame, even though they can have arbitrary depth (in the case of G = GLN , these rep- resentations are called essentially tame in the work of Bushnell and Henniart; when p ∤ N all supercuspidal representations are essentially tame). Hakim and Murnaghan [HM08] have shown that different Yu-data can lead to the same representation and have made a precise study of when this happens. This leads to the natural question of whether one can use simpler data to parameter- ize the supercuspidal representations resulting from Yu’s construction. Ideally, such data would consist simply of a maximal torus S ⊂ G and a character θ : S(F ) → C×, in analogy with the classification of discrete series representa- tions of real reductive groups, as well as that of supercuspidal representations of GLN when p ∤ N. There is an immediate obstruction to this: Most reductive groups over finite fields (but not GLN ) have cuspidal representations that are not immediately parameterizable by such pairs (for example cuspidal unipo- tent representations), and this obstruction propagates to depth-zero supercus- pidal representations of reductive groups over F . We therefore restrict our attention to Yu-data that satisfy a slight regularity condition, which is automat- ically satisfied for G = GLN , and whose main part is that the socle π−1 (when it is non-trivial) corresponds to a Deligne-Lusztig representation (of the reduc- tive quotient of a parahoric subgroup of G) that is associated to a character in general position. Let us call supercuspidal representations arising from such Yu-data regular. The first main goal of this paper is to give an explicit parame- terization of regular supercuspidal representations in terms of G(F )-conjugacy classes of pairs (S,θ). Partial results towards this were obtained earlier by Mur- naghan in [Mur11], where a further technical restriction is imposed on π−1 and an injective map is constructed from the set of equivalence classes of regular supercuspidal representations satisfying this additional technical restriction to the set of G(F )-conjugacy classes of pairs (S,θ) consisting of an elliptic max- imal torus and a character of it. No effective description of the image of this map was known. For many purposes it is important to have a map in the op- posite direction – from pairs (S,θ) to representations. In the current paper we introduce the notion of a tame regular elliptic pair (S,θ). This notion is defined in simple and explicit root-theoretic terms. We show that in the case of GLN it specializes to the classical notion of an admissible character. We give an explicit algorithm that, starting from a tame regular elliptic pair, produces a Yu-datum for a regular supercuspidal representation. This algorithm can be seen as a generalization to arbitrary reductive groups of the Howe factorization lemma ([How77, Lemma 11 and Corollary]) that plays an important role in the con- struction of supercuspidal representations of GLN . Just as in the case of GLN , the factorization we obtain is not unique, but we show that two possible fac- torizations are related to each other by a process already introduced by Hakim and Murnaghan, called refactorization. Their work implies that the resulting 3 supercuspidal representation is unaffected by this ambiguity, and may thus be called π(S,θ). We then show that two such representations are isomorphic if and only if the pairs giving rise to them are G(F )-conjugate. It is then straight- forward to check that the map (S,θ) 7→ π(S,θ) is the inverse to Murnaghan’s injection (after removing the additional technical restriction on π−1 imposed in [Mur11]). This implies that the image of Murnaghan’s map is precisely the set of G(F )-conjugcy classes of tame regular elliptic pairs. In this way, we obtain explicit mutually inverse bijections between the set of G(F )-conjugacy classes of tame regular elliptic pairs and the set of isomorphism classes of regular su- percuspidal representations. This classification result includes as a special ba- sic case the regular supercuspidal representations of depth zero. In fact, this special case is needed as the basis of our argument. When G splits over an unramified extension, regular depth-zero supercuspidal representations were studied by DeBacker and Reeder [DR09]. As a preparation for the study of regular supercuspidal representations of general depth, we extend their classi- fication results to the case of tamely ramified groups G. When the residual characteristic of F is not too small for G the work of Kim [Kim07] shows that all supercuspidal representations of G(F ) arise from Yu’s construction. Most of these are regular and thus of the form π(S,θ). For G = GLN with p ∤ N all supercuspidal representations are regular, but for other groups non-regular supercuspidal representations do exist, as the example of the four exceptional supercuspidal representations of SL2 shows. We believe that our work can be used to reduce the description of general supercuspidal representations in terms of elliptic (but not necessarily regular) pairs (S,θ) to the description of cuspidal representations of finite groups of Lie type in terms of Deligne-Lusztig virtual characters. It would be interesting to pursue this question. In the second part of the paper we study the Harish-Chandra character of su- percuspidal representations, and in particular of the representations π(S,θ). A formula for the character of a supercuspidal representation π arising from Yu’s construction has been given by Adler and Spice [AS09] and subsequently re- fined by DeBacker and Spice [DS]. At the moment this formula is only valid under the assumption that Gd−1(F )/Z(G)(F ) is compact, but in private com- munication the authors have assured me that this assumption will soon be re- moved. In the mean time we have proved in this paper a technical result which removes this condition in a certain special case that still allows us to draw con- clusions from it. The character formula [DS, Theorem 4.6.2] has the following form. Recall first that Yu’s construction produces not just a supercuspidal rep- i resentation π of G(F ), but in fact a supercuspidal representation πi of G (F ) for each i.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes 9: Eli Cartan's Theorem on Maximal Tori
    Notes 9: Eli Cartan’s theorem on maximal tori. Version 1.00 — still with misprints, hopefully fewer Tori Let T be a torus of dimension n. This means that there is an isomorphism T S1 S1 ... S1. Recall that the Lie algebra Lie T is trivial and that the exponential × map× is× a group homomorphism, so there is an exact sequence of Lie groups exp 0 N Lie T T T 1 where the kernel NT of expT is a discrete subgroup Lie T called the integral lattice of T . The isomorphism T S1 S1 ... S1 induces an isomorphism Lie T Rn under which the exponential map× takes× the× form 2πit1 2πit2 2πitn exp(t1,...,tn)=(e ,e ,...,e ). Irreducible characters. Any irreducible representation V of T is one dimensio- nal and hence it is given by a multiplicative character; that is a group homomorphism 1 χ: T Aut(V )=C∗. It takes values in the unit circle S — the circle being the → only compact and connected subgroup of C∗ — hence we may regard χ as a Lie group map χ: T S1. → The character χ has a derivative at the unit which is a map θ = d χ :LieT e → Lie S1 of Lie algebras. The two Lie algebras being trivial and Lie S1 being of di- 1 mension one, this is just a linear functional on Lie T . The tangent space TeS TeC∗ = ⊆ C equals the imaginary axis iR, which we often will identify with R. The derivative θ fits into the commutative diagram exp 0 NT Lie T T 1 θ N θ χ | T exp 1 1 0 NS1 Lie S S 1 The linear functional θ is not any linear functional, the values it takes on the discrete 1 subgroup NT are all in N 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Math 210C. Simple Factors 1. Introduction Let G Be a Nontrivial Connected Compact Lie Group, and Let T ⊂ G Be a Maximal Torus
    Math 210C. Simple factors 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group, and let T ⊂ G be a maximal torus. 0 Assume ZG is finite (so G = G , and the converse holds by Exercise 4(ii) in HW9). Define Φ = Φ(G; T ) and V = X(T )Q, so (V; Φ) is a nonzero root system. By the handout \Irreducible components of root systems", (V; Φ) is uniquely a direct sum of irreducible components f(Vi; Φi)g in the following sense. There exists a unique collection of nonzero Q-subspaces Vi ⊂ V such that for Φi := Φ \ Vi the following hold: each pair ` (Vi; Φi) is an irreducible root system, ⊕Vi = V , and Φi = Φ. Our aim is to use the unique irreducible decomposition of the root system (which involves the choice of T , unique up to G-conjugation) and some Exercises in HW9 to prove: Theorem 1.1. Let fGjgj2J be the set of minimal non-trivial connected closed normal sub- groups of G. (i) The set J is finite, the Gj's pairwise commute, and the multiplication homomorphism Y Gj ! G is an isogeny. Q (ii) If ZG = 1 or π1(G) = 1 then Gi ! G is an isomorphism (so ZGj = 1 for all j or π1(Gj) = 1 for all j respectively). 0 (iii) Each connected closed normal subgroup N ⊂ G has finite center, and J 7! GJ0 = hGjij2J0 is a bijection between the set of subsets of J and the set of connected closed normal subgroups of G. (iv) The set fGjg is in natural bijection with the set fΦig via j 7! i(j) defined by the condition T \ Gj = Ti(j).
    [Show full text]
  • Loop Groups and Twisted K-Theory III
    Annals of Mathematics 174 (2011), 947{1007 http://dx.doi.org/10.4007/annals.2011.174.2.5 Loop groups and twisted K-theory III By Daniel S. Freed, Michael J. Hopkins, and Constantin Teleman Abstract In this paper, we identify the Ad-equivariant twisted K-theory of a compact Lie group G with the \Verlinde group" of isomorphism classes of admissible representations of its loop groups. Our identification pre- serves natural module structures over the representation ring R(G) and a natural duality pairing. Two earlier papers in the series covered founda- tions of twisted equivariant K-theory, introduced distinguished families of Dirac operators and discussed the special case of connected groups with free π1. Here, we recall the earlier material as needed to make the paper self-contained. Going further, we discuss the relation to semi-infinite co- homology, the fusion product of conformal field theory, the r^oleof energy and a topological Peter-Weyl theorem. Introduction Let G be a compact Lie group and LG the space of smooth maps S1 !G, the loop group of G. The latter has a distinguished class of irreducible pro- jective unitary representations, the integrable lowest-weight representations. They are rigid; in fact, if we fix the central extension LGτ of LG there is a finite number of isomorphism classes. Our main theorem identifies the free abelian group Rτ (LG) they generate with a twisted version of the equivari- ant topological K-theory group KG(G), where G acts on itself by conjugation. The twisting is constructed from the central extension of the loop group.
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Groups of Lie Type: Subgroup Structure and Unipotent Elements
    Exceptional groups of Lie type: subgroup structure and unipotent elements Donna Testerman EPF Lausanne 17 December 2012 Donna Testerman (EPF Lausanne) Exceptional groups of Lie type: subgroup structure and unip17 Decemberotent elements 2012 1 / 110 Outline: I. Maximal subgroups of exceptional groups, finite and algebraic II. Lifting results III. Overgroups of unipotent elements Donna Testerman (EPF Lausanne) Exceptional groups of Lie type: subgroup structure and unip17 Decemberotent elements 2012 2 / 110 Maximal subgroups of exceptional algebraic groups Let G be a simple algebraic group of exceptional type, defined over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p ≥ 0. Let M ⊂ G be a maximal positive-dimensional closed subgroup. By the Borel-Tits theorem, if M◦ is not reductive, then M is a maximal parabolic subgroup of G. Now if M◦ is reductive, it is possible that M◦ contains a maximal torus of G. It is straightforward to describe subgroups containing maximal tori of G via the Borel-de Siebenthal algorithm. Then M is the full normalizer of such a group, and finding such M which are maximal is again straightfoward. Donna Testerman (EPF Lausanne) Exceptional groups of Lie type: subgroup structure and unip17 Decemberotent elements 2012 3 / 110 So finally, one is left to consider the subgroups M such that M◦ is reductive, and M does not contain a maximal torus of G. A classification of the positive-dimensional maximal closed subgroups of G was completed in 2004 by Liebeck and Seitz. (Earlier work of Seitz had reduced this problem to those cases where char(k) is ‘small’.) Donna Testerman (EPF Lausanne) Exceptional groups of Lie type: subgroup structure and unip17 Decemberotent elements 2012 4 / 110 We may assume the exceptional group G to be an adjoint type group, as maximal subgroups of an arbitrary simple algebraic group G˜ must contain Z(G˜ ) and hence will have an image which is a maximal subgroup of the adjoint group.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Borel Transgression in the Fibration $ G\Rightarrow G/T$
    On the Borel transgression in the fibration G → G/T Haibao Duan∗ Institute of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; School of Mathematical Sciences, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [email protected] September 16, 2018 Abstract Let G be a semisimple Lie group with a maximal torus T . We present 1 2 an explicit formula for the Borel transgression τ : H (T ) → H (G/T ) of the fibration G → G/T . This formula corrects an error in the paper [9], and has been applied to construct the integral cohomology rings of compact Lie groups in the sequel works [4, 7]. 2010 Mathematical Subject Classification: 55T10, 57T10 Key words and phrases: Lie groups; Cohomology, Leray–Serre spec- tral sequence 1 Introduction A Lie group is called semisimple if its center is finite; is called adjoint if its center is trivial. In this paper the Lie groups G under consideration are compact, connected and semisimple. The homology and cohomology are over the ring of integers, unless otherwise stated. For a Lie group G with a maximal torus T let π : G → G/T be the quotient fibration. Consider the diagram with top row the cohomology exact sequence of the pair (G, T ) arXiv:1710.03014v1 [math.AT] 9 Oct 2017 ∗ i∗ δ j 0 → H1(G) → H1(T ) → H2(G, T ) → H2(G) → · · · ∗ ց τ =∼↑ π H2(G/T ) where, since the pair (G, T ) is 1–connected, the induced map π∗ is an isomor- phism. The Borel transgression [11, p.185] in the fibration π is the composition τ = (π∗)−1 ◦ δ : H1(T ) → H2(G/T ).
    [Show full text]
  • Maximal Tori, Weyl Groups, and Roots
    Maximal tori, Weyl groups, and roots Ethan Lake 9/7/2015 1 Maximal tori Our goal in these notes is to try to understand the most important basic notions of the representation theory of Lie algebras. Of course, this is still very much a work in progress! Throughout, we let G denote a finite group. Definition 1.1. Let g be a finite-dimensional Lie algebra. A torus t is a com- mutative sub-algebra of g. A maximal torus is a torus which is not strictly contained in any other larger torus. Lemma 1.1. If t is a maximal torus of a Lie algebra g, then t is equal to its centralizer. Proof. Since t is commutative by definition, it is contained within its centralizer. Conversely, let Z be in the centralizer of t. Then t + KZ is also a torus, where K is the field we're working over. But t is maximal by assumption, and so Z 2 t. We can also define tori through the group U(1). The representation theory of U(1) is easy { each irreducible representation is labeled by some integer n. The natural way to construct a torus T is to take the product of m circles U(1)×· · ·×U(1), whose irreducible representations will be labeled by m integers. If we take some random G, we can attack the problem of finding the irreducible representations of G by taking the largest possible (the maximal) torus T such that T ⊂ G, and trying to understand the quotient G=T . Rather surprisingly, this turns out to be quite helpful in many cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximal Tori and the Weyl Integration Formula 1
    MAXIMAL TORI AND THE WEYL INTEGRATION FORMULA TAKUMI MURAYAMA 1. Introduction Consider G a compact, connected Lie group. A maximal torus is a subgroup of G that is also a torus Tk ' Rk=Zk, and is a maximal such subgroup with respect to inclusion. The Weyl group of G, defined as W = N(T )=T for a maximal torus T , depends definitionally on the choice of a maximal torus T , but by showing that any two tori are conjugate, we can see that W is unique up to isomorphism. This also shows that every conjugacy class in G meets T , and so to compute the integral of a class function, i.e., a function invariant under conjugation (such as the inner product of two characters), it should suffice to integrate only over the torus. The formula that allows this is the important Weyl Integration Formula (Theorem 4.1), which is fundamental in representation theory and in other areas like random matrix theory. What is in fact remarkable about the conjugacy theorem and the Weyl Integration formula is the variety of approaches one can take in proving them, although the conjugacy theorem was first found by Elie´ Cartan and the Weyl Integration formula by Hermann Weyl. Some are based on the Hopf-Rinow theorem from differential geometry [4], others are based on Andr´eWeil's proof using the Lefschetz fixed-point formula from algebraic topology [1], and still others are based on a (rather tedious, yet enlightening) move back and forth between G and its associated Lie algebra, where there is a similar theorem on the conjugacy of Cartan subalgebras, which has an elegant proof due to Hunt [7], [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Math G4344, Spring 2012
    Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Math G4344, Spring 2012 We'll now turn from the general theory to examine a specific class class of groups: the orthogonal groups. Recall that O(n; R) is the group of n by n orthogonal matrices (the group preserving the standard inner product on Rn). This group has two components, with the component of the identity SO(n; R), the orthogonal matrices of determinant 1. We'll mostly restrict attention to SO(n; R). An important feature of SO(n; R) is that it is not simply-connnected. One has π1(SO(n; R)) = Z2 and the simply-connected double cover is the group Spin(n; R) (the simply- connected double cover of O(n; R) is called P in(n; R. It is this group for which we want to find an explicit construction. The Lie algebras spin(n; R) and so(n; R) are isomorphic, and the complex simple Lie algebra that corresponds to them is spin(n; C) or so(n; C). The group Spin(n; C) will be the simply- connected complex Lie group corresponding to the Lie algebra spin(n; R). It's compact real form is our Spin(n; R). Note that one can start more generally with a non-degenerate quadratic form Q over R. Such quadratic forms can be diagonalized, with p +1s and q −1s as diagonal entries (p + q = n, the rank). There are corresponding orthogonal and spin groups SO(p; q; R) and Spin(p; q; R), which are isometry groups for these more general quadratic forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Methods in Representation Theory
    Geometric Methods in Representation Theory Wilfried Schmid¤ Lecture Notes Taken by Matvei Libine February 4, 2004 Abstract These are notes from the mini-course given by W. Schmid in June 2003 at the Brussels PQR2003 Euroschool. Both authors are very thankful to Simone Gutt for organizing the conference and her hospitality. Contents 1 Reductive Lie Groups: De¯nitions and Basic Properties 2 1.1 Basic De¯nitions and Examples . 2 1.2 Maximal Compact Subgroups and the Cartan Decomposition . 3 1.3 Complexi¯cations of Linear Groups . 4 2 Compact Lie Groups 6 2.1 Maximal Tori, the Unit Lattice, and the Weight Lattice . 6 2.2 Weights, Roots, and the Weyl Group . 7 2.3 The Theorem of the Highest Weight . 9 2.4 Borel Subalgebras and the Flag Variety . 11 2.5 The Borel-Weil-Bott Theorem . 12 3 Representations of Reductive Lie Groups 14 1 3.1 Notions of Continuity and Admissibility, KR-¯nite and C Vectors . 14 3.2 Harish-Chandra Modules . 17 4 Geometric Constructions of Representations 21 4.1 The Universal Cartan Algebra and In¯nitesimal Characters . 21 4.2 Twisted D-modules . 23 4.3 Construction of Harish-Chandra Modules . 25 4.4 Construction of GR-representations . 27 4.5 Matsuki Correspondence . 29 ¤Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-0070714 1 1 Reductive Lie Groups: De¯nitions and Basic Properties The results stated in this section are fairly standard. Proofs and further details can be found in [23], for instance. 1.1 Basic De¯nitions and Examples In these notes \Lie algebra" means ¯nite dimensional Lie algebra over R or C.
    [Show full text]
  • E8 + E8 Heterotic String Theory in Vedic Physics
    E8 + E8 Heterotic String Theory in Vedic Physics By John Frederic Sweeney Abstract S.M. Phillips has articulated a fairly good model of the E8×E8 heterotic superstring, yet nevertheless has missed a few key aspects. This paper informs his model from the perspective of Vedic Nuclear Physics, as derived from the Rig Veda and two of the Upanishads. In addition, the author hypothesizes an extension of the Exceptional Lie Algebra Series beyond E8 to another 12 places or more. 1 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Wikipedia 5 S.M. Phillips model 12 H series of Hypercircles 14 Conclusion 18 Bibliography 21 2 Introduction S.M. Phillips has done a great sleuthing job in exploring the Jewish Cabala along with the works of Basant and Leadbetter to formulate a model of the Exceptional Lie Algebra E8 to represent nuclear physics that comes near to the Super String model. The purpose of this paper is to offer minor corrections from the perspective of the science encoded in the Rig Veda and in a few of the Upanishads, to render a complete and perfect model. The reader might ask how the Jewish Cabala might offer insight into nuclear physics, since the Cabala is generally thought to date from Medieval Spain. The simple fact is that the Cabala does not represent medieval Spanish thought, it is a product of a much older and advanced society – Remotely Ancient Egypt from 15,000 years ago, before the last major flooding of the Earth and the Sphinx. The Jewish people may very well have left Ancient Egypt in the Exodus, led by Moses.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOMETRY of SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS Contents 1. Regular
    PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS Contents 1. Regular elements in semisimple Lie algebras 1 2. The flag variety and the Bruhat decomposition 3 3. The Grothendieck-Springer resolution 6 4. The nilpotent cone 10 5. The Jacobson-Morozov theorem 13 6. The exponents of g 18 7. Regular elements and the principal slice 21 8. The first Kostant theorem 24 9. The second Kostant theorem 26 10. The third Kostant theorem 27 References 34 1. Regular elements in semisimple Lie algebras Let G be a connected semisimple algebraic group over C, and let g = Lie(G) be its Lie algebra. Definition 1.1. A semisimple element s 2 g is regular if its centralizer Zg(s) = fx 2 g j [x; s] = 0g is a Cartan subalgebra. Recall that a Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent subalgebra which is self-normalizing. Cartans are maximal abelian subalgebras (though not all maximal abelian subalgebras are Cartans!), and they consist entirely of semisimple elements. All Cartans are conjugate under the adjoint action of G, and every semisimple element is contained in a Cartan. Remark 1.2. Equivalently, a semisimple element s 2 g is regular if and only if the centralizer ZG(s) = fg 2 G j Adg(s) = sg is a maximal torus. We will denote by grs the subset of regular semisimple elements of g. Fix a Cartan h, and let Φ be the corresponding root system. This produces a corresponding root space decomposition ! M g = h ⊕ gα ; α2Φ where gα = fx 2 g j h · x = α(h)x 8h 2 hg: 1 PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS 2 Lemma 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Subgroups of Simple Algebraic Groups Containing Regular Tori, and Irreducible Representations with Multiplicity 1 Non-Zero Weights
    Transformation Groups, Vol. ?, No. ?, ??, pp. 1{?? c Birkh¨auserBoston (??) SUBGROUPS OF SIMPLE ALGEBRAIC GROUPS CONTAINING REGULAR TORI, AND IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS WITH MULTIPLICITY 1 NON-ZERO WEIGHTS D. M. TESTERMAN A. E. ZALESSKI Ecole Polytechnique F´ed´eralede Department of Physics, Lausanne Mathematics and Informatics FSP-MATHGEOM Academy of Sciences of Belarus Station 8 66 Prospect Nezalejnasti CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 220000 Belarus, Minsk donna.testerman@epfl.ch [email protected] Abstract. Our main goal is to determine, under certain restrictions, the maximal closed connected subgroups of simple linear algebraic groups containing a regular torus. We call a torus regular if its centralizer is abelian. We also obtain some results of independent interest. In particular, we determine the irreducible representations of simple algebraic groups whose non-zero weights occur with multiplicity 1. 1. Introduction Let H be a simple linear algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic p ≥ 0. The closed subgroups of H containing a maximal torus, so-called subgroups of maximal rank, play a substantial role in the structure theory of semisimple linear algebraic groups. A naturally occurring family of maximal rank subgroups of H are subsystem subgroups; a subsystem subgroup of H is a closed semisimple subgroup G of H, normalized by a maximal torus of H. For such a subgroup G, the root system of G is, in a natural way, a subset of the root system of H. The main results of [32, 4] imply that every subgroup of maximal rank is either contained in a parabolic subgroup of H, or lies in the normalizer of a subsystem subgroup.
    [Show full text]