EXTRAORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING

on

Monday 29 October 2012

at 9am

Council Chamber District Council Building King George Place Timaru

TIMARU DISTRICT COUNCIL

Notice is hereby given that an Extraordinary meeting of the Timaru District Council will be held in the Council Chamber, District Council Building, King George Place, Timaru on Monday 29 October 2012 at 9am.

LOCAL AUTHORITIES (MEMBERS’ INTERESTS) ACT 1968 Councillors are reminded that if you have a pecuniary interest in any item on the agenda, then you must declare this interest and refrain from discussing or voting on this item, and are advised to withdraw from the meeting table.

Peter Nixon CHIEF EXECUTIVE

TIMARU DISTRICT COUNCIL

EXTRAORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING

29 OCTOBER 2012

AGENDA

Item Page No No

1 Apologies

2 1 Representation Review 2012 – Initial (Draft) Proposal Hearing and Final Proposal Decision

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 29 October 2012

TIMARU DISTRICT COUNCIL

FOR THE MEETING OF 29 OCTOBER 2012

Report for Agenda Item No 2

Prepared by Mark Low Electoral Officer

Representation Review 2012 – Initial (Draft) Proposal Hearing and Final Proposal Decision (File E2/3)

______

Purpose of Report The purpose of this report is:

• to advise Council of the feedback from the formal submission period on the Initial Proposal for the Representation Review; • to advise of the hearing programme for the submissions on the Initial Proposal; and • for Council to adopt a final proposal for representation arrangements for advertising under Section 19N of the Local Electoral Act.

Initial Proposal Hearing and Submissions Submissions on the Initial Proposal closed at 5.00pm on Monday 8 October 2012. There were 817 submissions either in favour or opposed to the proposal.

As the submissions are on a single topic, they have been treated slightly differently to other submission processes.

Where submissions are extensive, a full copy is provided in the Submissions Volume and a summary is provided in the Submissions Summary reports. The Summary reports are included in this agenda. All other submissions have been typed verbatim into these reports.

A full index of all submitters can be found in the Submissions Volume. The two boxes of submissions are available for anyone interested in viewing them.

Enclosed with this agenda are:

• Hearing Schedule - submitters to be heard on Monday 29 October 2012. It can be cross referenced to the Submissions Volume by the submission number and page numbers shown in the columns on the left hand side of the table. The page numbers refer to either the full submission in the Submissions Volume or the verbatim typed submission in this agenda or where applicable both.

39 submitters have requested to speak to their submissions.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 1 29 October 2012

• Submission Summary Reports – document summarising individual submissions by those in support or those opposed.

• Submissions Volume - this includes the following: • Full copy of extensive individual submissions. • Submission Index of Full Copy submissions provided (by submission number). • Submission Index of all Submitters (by submission number).

Summary of Submission Feedback Submissions were received from across the district. A high proportion were received from rural areas.

Submissions in Support Around 95% of submissions were in support of the proposal. The main reasons noted for support were: • Retains local voice • Guarantee of geographical rural representation • Better understanding of local area by local people • Retention of the ward structure guaranteed under 1989 amalgamations • Fairer system of representation • Reduces risk of party politics in Council • Well established communities of interest • System has worked for 23 years/works well • No need for change/not broken • Fair, balanced and simple system • Less change for the community • Access to local representative • Cost of campaigning for candidates across the district.

Submissions Opposed Submissions opposed to the proposal generally fall into two categories: 1) Those who support retaining a ward system but would like some other combination of electoral options. For example, these include retaining the wards but also electing some at large, splitting Timaru ward into more wards, combining the rural wards or retaining the existing structure. 2) Those who support an at large system

The main reasons noted for supporting other options were: • Retaining the same number of Councillors as currently exists • Desire to vote for all Councillors being elected • Councillors accountable to the whole district • Wards return unopposed candidates, which is undemocratic • At large enables higher calibre and wider variety of candidates • At large most democratic option • At large would support workings of Council • Communication opportunities means ward system no longer necessary • Need to continue to break down the rural/urban divide • Lack of or misleading information about other options • Concern about an even number of Councillors and the Mayor having a casting vote

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 2 29 October 2012

Options Following the hearing and consideration of submissions, the Council needs to finalise the 2012 representation proposal. Once this is confirmed, the Proposal is again publicly advertised as open for Appeals or Objections.

If the proposal is unchanged , under legislation, appeals can only be made by anyone who has submitted on the Initial Proposal. If the proposal is changed, anyone can appeal or object to the proposal.

The following options are available:

• Option 1 Confirm the Initial Proposal as the Final Proposal, as stated below:

Timaru District Council

Mayor elected at large

9 Councillors as follows:

Geraldine Ward (based on current Geraldine Ward Boundary) – One (1) Councillor

Pleasant Point – Temuka Ward (based on current Pleasant Point - Temuka Ward Boundaries) - Two (2) Councillors

Timaru Ward (based on current Timaru Ward Boundary) -

Six (6) Councillors.

Community Boards

Geraldine Community Board Six (6) elected members from the Geraldine community as a whole and one (1) appointed member, (the appointed member being the Geraldine Ward Councillor).

Pleasant Point Community Board Five (5) elected members from the Pleasant Point community as a whole and two (2) appointed members, (the appointed members being the Pleasant Point- Temuka Ward Councillors).

Temuka Community Board Five (5) elected members from the Temuka community as a whole and two (2) appointed members, (the appointed members being the Pleasant Point-Temuka Ward Councillors).

Boundaries

Geraldine Ward and Geraldine Community The Geraldine Ward and community is the area delineated on S.O. Plan No. 19948 deposited with the Chief Surveyor of the Canterbury Land District, (this is the same as the current Geraldine Ward).

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 3 29 October 2012

Pleasant Point – Temuka Ward, Pleasant Point Community and Temuka Community The Pleasant Point – Temuka Ward is the area delineated by S.O. Plan 19946 and 19949 deposited with the Chief Surveyor of the Canterbury Land District, (this is the same as the current Pleasant Point - Temuka Ward). The Pleasant Point community is the area delineated by S.O. Plan No. 19946 and the Temuka community is the area delineated by S.O. Plan No. 19949 deposited with the Chief Surveyor of the Canterbury Land District, (these are the same as the former Pleasant Point and Temuka wards).

Timaru Ward The Timaru Ward is the area delineated on S.O. Plan No. 19947 deposited with the Chief Surveyor of the Canterbury Land District, (this is the same as the current Timaru Ward).

• Option 2 Confirm some other proposal as the Final Proposal.

The representation review timetable from this point forward is summarised below:

2012 Date Task Week 29-31 October Council Hearing on submissions and Final proposal confirmed 10 November Final proposal advertised via public notice (via Council Noticeboard) Appeals/Objections to final proposal open 10 December Appeals/Objections to final proposal close 2013 15 January Latest date that Appeals/Objections can be forwarded to the Local Government Commission 11 April Latest date by which the Local Government Commission can determine Appeals/Objections

Identification of Relevant Legislation, Council Policy and Plans Local Electoral Act 2001. Local Government Act 2002.

Assessment of Significance The representation review decision is significant under the Council’s Significance Policy and has been extensively consulted upon with the community. Confirmation of the Final Proposal is the final task that Council must complete before Local Government Commission involvement, (if appeals or objections are received).

Consultation Extensive consultation has been undertaken, including: • Advisory Panel • Pre-consultation • Community Boards discussions • Formal consultation under Section 19M of the Local Electoral Act.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 4 29 October 2012

Other Considerations The Council’s final representation proposal will be publicly notified. Any person or organisation that has made submissions on the initial proposal may appeal in writing against the Council’s decision adopting the final proposal. Where the Council’s final proposal is based on changes to the initial proposal, any interested person or organisation may lodge an objection in writing to the final proposal. All eligible appeals or objections are forwarded to the Local Government Commission.

Should appeals or objections be received, the Local Government Commission will consider the Council’s final proposal together with any appeals and objections. The Local Government Commission may hold hearings with those who made appeals and objections which may take place in the Timaru District. The Local Government Commission makes a final determination which is only subject to judicial review in respect of matters of law.

Funding Implications Any costs will be taken from the Public Relations budget as previously agreed.

Conclusion A final Proposal must now be confirmed to be formally advertised for Appeals or Objections under the Local Electoral Act, with notification required by 10 November 2012. Should Appeals or Objections be received on the proposal, the Local Electoral Commission will become involved to make the final decision on representation for the 2013 elections.

Recommendations a) That the Council receives the report. b) That the submissions on the Initial Proposal are received and noted. c) That the Final Proposal as agreed is formally adopted for public notification consultation under Section 19N of the Local Electoral Act 2012.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 5 29 October 2012

REPRESENTATION REVIEW 2012 HEARING TIMETABLE MONDAY 29 OCTOBER 2012

Time Submission Submission Agenda Submitter No. Volume Page No. Page No. (Where applicable) 9.00am General matters relating to hearing 9.10am 23 4 90 Russell Scobie 9.20am 50 31 90 Peter McAuley 9.30am 177 22 Matt Pomana 9.40am 217 24 Mark Mason 9.50am 275 26 Wayne Maybee 10.00am 262 26 Shirley Sheed 10.10am 325 28 Brian McCully 10.20am 813 87 Graeme Kenny 10.30am Morning Tea 10.50am 628 65 59 Geraldine Community Board 11.00am 47 14 15 Kerry Stevens 11.10am 814 116 88 McGregor Simpson 11.20am 757 96 79 Danny Gresham 11.30am 417 31 Paul & Sue Goodwin 11.40am 421 32 Wayne Whitmore 11.50am 437 34 Lesley Fallon 12.00pm 555 48 47 Don Binney 12.10pm 640 69 95 Geoffrey Smith 12.20pm 567 50 50 Donald Aubrey 12.30pm Lunch 1.10pm 604 57 94 Gerrie Ligtenberg 1.20pm 800 98 Mark Eaton / David Williams 1.30pm 643 71 61 Bruce Leadley 1.40pm 645 73 62 Marion Seymour 1.50pm 655 64 Don Keene 2.00pm 486 41 Karen Van Zeyl 2.10pm 749 92 78 SC Federated Farmers – Ivon Hurst

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 6 29 October 2012

Time Submission Submission Agenda Submitter No. Volume Page No. Page No. (Where applicable) 2.20pm 675 65 David Diamond 2.30pm 707 70 Jim Parr 2.40pm 711 82 71 Elizabeth & Reese Hart 2.50pm 731 86 74 Ian Bowan 3.00pm 458 38 36 Wynne Raymond 3.10pm Afternoon Tea 3.30pm 758 97 96 Janya Lobb 3.40pm 764 80 Peter Stayt 3.50pm 773 81 James Hopa 4.00pm 776 111 97 Tony Howey 4.10pm 787 83 Kathleen Aker 4.20pm 769 107 96 Jan Finlayson 4.30pm 795 115 85 Temuka Community Board 4.40pm 505 45 43 Pleasant Point Community Board 4.50pm 791 84 Raewyn Hessell 5.00pm Consideration of submissions and balance of agenda items

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 7 29 October 2012

Summary of Submissions Supporting Initial Proposal

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 8 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 1 S Rarity I believe that rural areas should be represented by an elected local community member as they have the knowledge and information necessary to engage in formal debate/decision making processes appropriate and relevant to their community, without threat of hidden agenda(s). 2 R Rarity I strongly believe that rural communities require representation that has, at its heart, a prime function of rural focus. This has been ably provided by the ward structure that empowers the rural wards to elect a representative who, by virtue of the electoral process, is in no doubt of their electoral responsibilities. Recent debate has suggested that this is outmoded and that an 'at large' alternative would be more democratic. I would strongly disagree: it is significantly more likely that merging the electorate would result in weight of numbers favoring those candidates whose platform played to the urban population - who have little interest in matters rural if those matters ran counter to their own parochial views. It is of note that I am not persuaded that the urban councillors make much effort to canvass the opinion of their electorate - it seems that the triennial election is regarded more as a charter to rule with the silent acquiescence of the electorate than a privilege granted. My understanding is that the rural councillors are, by nature of their position, somewhat more aware of the foundations of their political existence. Hence I support the retention of the 'ring-fenced' rural wards and of the review process. 3 J McKinnon I support the proposed representation i.e. Council comprise nine members elected from three wards and the mayor (elected at large). 4 P Lewis The Timaru District Council is an extensive area, unique in having two reasonable size towns, as well as the city. Both towns have their own particular importance, with Geraldine having a high percentage of retired and elderly, as well as three Retirement homes and hospitals. It is also the hub of several thriving businesses, as well as being involved intensely in the Dairy industry. As Geraldine is on the ‘outskirts’ of the area and because of the distance from the ‘hub’, it is essential to have a ‘ward’ member as Councillor. 5 C Crotty It is essential that we retain the ward system in the Timaru District. It is vital that we have local councillors, who know the people, and the country areas, someone who

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 9 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) can be approached, re problems that arise from time to time. Geraldine is an area that needs a local Councillor. It has all the amenities that make up a community (i.e. schools, doctors, pharmacy, supermarket, stock firm, and four banks). There is no need to drive to Timaru for anything. It is its own area. The ward structure is a fair one, and ensures a balanced urban rural representation. It means that rural people will be assured of representation. It also, acts as a check against party politics becoming entrenched in local government. 6 D&E Burton The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table. Geraldine needs representation. 7 K Moginie I vote to support this motion as: 1. I fear Geraldine will lose its identity and just become an ‘outreach’ of Timaru. 2. This option gives us a guaranteed voice at Council table and knowledge that we have a representative who will do his/her best for our community. 3. The ward system we have had for years works very well – why is there a need to change (i.e. a valid reason). 8 R Bailey I seek the approval of the proposal. I oppose the earlier draft proposal for an ‘at large’ Council because it rides roughshod – cruddy so-over any reasonable application of democratic principles in the present context. What is the context? Not a City council but a District council – where common sense alone suggests the desirability of a ward system. I can only guess at the motivation of Councillors proposing an ‘at large’ system and would not seek to impugn it even slightly. I do know that if an ‘at large’ system were adopted, I would strongly support any action that resulted in the matter being placed in the hands of the LGC for resolution. As the Timaru Herald editor has surmised, this could result in a reduction of councillor numbers. 9 J&K Goodwin The Goodwin family originally came to farm at Hilton, Geraldine in 1933 so there is a deep sense of loyalty for this area. A sense of concern for the rural people may be lacking a little in urban areas, so the ward system ensures that the voting outcome will be a balanced one. The rural areas pay a great deal of rates revenue and often are left with very poor services and roads full of potholes and that’s under the ward system, so

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 10 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) how much worse would it get with low or no representation? 10 M Halsey I want a Councillor in Geraldine that lives here that I can access 365 days of the year. I support the Ward system. 11 F Coles Rural communities and townships have unique needs which must be represented by councillors who have an innate understanding of these issues, preferably by living in the same communities of those they represent. It is also vital that these small rural towns have a voice (and voting rights!!) around the council table in a fashion that best represents the proportional make up of the district. Ward systems are the best way of doing this to ensure fair representation of both urban and rural interests. How would the Timaru councillors who have largely supported the ‘voting at large’ option feel to have Timaru represented in central government by someone who came from say, Wellington or Auckland? In effect they are proposing a similarly irrational scheme to us, the rural ratepayers of the district. Please ensure ‘democracy prevails’ and all residents have a voice around the council table that best represents their own interests, not their neighbours. 12 R Smith Ward system ensures balanced urban – rural representation. 13 J Young The current ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities as the Council table and it is a fair, balanced and simple system. It also reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in the Local Governme nt. Geraldine needs its own Councillor to have a say at the Council table as we pay ‘higher rates than the people in Timaru. 14 R Bush Support the above proposal on the basis that the outlying districts need specific representation to relay the needs of the areas in which we live as opposed to electing members ‘at large’ where an imbalance of representation would inevitably occur. 15 K Deam The earlier proposal vote showed that the outlying were liable to be disenfranchised. If the one abstaining had voted the Mayor would vote status quo and save a lot of trouble and expense. 16 M&R Thatcher In support of the proposal of Timaru – 6 Councillors, Temuka/Pleasant Point – 2 Councillors, Geraldine – 1 Councillor; for the following reasons: Country areas need

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 11 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) representation, the ward system has worked well since amalgamation so why change it. 17 1 B Mulvey (summarised) Support ward system. Fairest method and ensures rural communities retain a meaningful voice in Council. At large representation is likely to lead to rural communities disenfranchised and increase party politics in local government. 18 2 F Mulvey (summarised) Support ward system. Fairest method and ensures rural communities retain a meaningful voice in Council. At large representation is likely to lead to rural communities disenfranchised and increase party politics in local government. 19 S&A Whitley I do not believe Seadown and Levels have been well served under the existing system since the merger with Timaru District Council. I am strongly opposed to an at large voting system being implemented. 20 R Trumper I am very much in favour in retaining the council as it is with the 9 ward system to remain. The thoughts and needs of the smaller towns must NOT be forgotten. My grandfather was a mayor of Temuka from 1931 – 1941. I know all this was a long time ago but these men with their councillors worked long and hard for the benefit of their towns - and - without a past there can be no future. 21 C Chaplin, I am writing this submission on behalf of the Milford residents of Milford Lagoon to retain the Ward Lagoon system as it stands. We must have our own residents representation otherwise we will be cast aside and forgotten in the future. Spokesperson for Milford Lagoon – “Only fools rush in where angels fear to tread” 22 3 S Garnett, (summarised) and signed That the ward system continue, in regards to by 15 elected representatives on the Timaru District submitters Council, and not the proposed system of ten from Councillors at large. It is imperative for the Geraldine welfare and future of Geraldine and District, that a person with local knowledge and understanding, be duly elected to be our representative. 24 L McMillan I wish to put a submission to retain the Ward QSM Based Representation system. The reasons for my submission are as follows: • The retention of the three Councillors for the Pleasant Point, Temuka and Geraldine Wards of the Timaru District Council • The retention of the Pleasant Point, Temuka

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 12 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) and Geraldine Community Boards Both of the above are vital to allow the rural communities served by these Councillors and Community Boards to have a voice in matters that apply to the communities that they represent. The disestablishment of these would take from the rural communities their democratic right to have a voice in the decision making for their communities. 25 J Kenton I wish to add my name to those in favour of a member of Council for the Geraldine ward. I am a ratepayer and feel we need a representative for our area. 26 M Carroll From my point of view it’s worked well during its term so why change it? 27 A Gregg I support the current ward system minus one Timaru Councillor, because local people know what is going on in their local areas, because they live in them and are more aware of community needs and interests. We already have little or no representation on TDC. Certainly Geraldine has no-one to speak up for our interests. Already what is best for Timaru and Timaru ratepayers takes priority. We need a councillor who is available to us and has an interest in his or her local area. This is of primary importance and needs to be respected - it is also democratic. Geraldine has a sense of identity and this needs maintaining. We do not belong to Timaru! Economically or socially. 28 L Autridge I believe it is very important for the smaller rural communities to have representation by members of that community in the decision making by Council. Too often our ‘voices’ are not heard and it seems that our needs in our community get brushed aside, e.g. the Geraldine Swimming Pool. I therefore support representation of a Geraldine Ward member and elected members to the Geraldine Community Board. 29 J Tarrant I support the initial proposal, e.g. Ward System. Why change something that was voted in by Ratepayers when Temuka, Geraldine and Strathallan amalgamated 20 plus years ago. Ward System has worked well in the past. I see no need for change. 30 P Johnson As least the Wards do have a say through their Councillor. 31 A Tarrant I support current ward system. 32 6 Signed by That the ward system continue, in regards to 33 7 54 elected representatives on the Timaru District 34 8 submitters Council, and not the proposed system of ten

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 13 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 35 9 from Councillors at large. It is imperative for the 36 10 Geraldine welfare and future of Geraldine and District, that a 37 11 person with local knowledge and understanding, be duly elected to be our representative. 38 P Blakie To be fair to all ratepayers leave the current Ward Structure as is. This provides effective representation to all Communities of Interest. 39 I Leigh In all fairness to surrounding districts to have their say, they should have their own individual representative on the Council. That way each district can raise its own submissions and put it forward by its own representative. 40 L Blakie The current ward structure ensures a good balance of urban and rural presentation. It protects our rural vote and local voice in local government. 41 W South The current ward structure works very well for Pleasant Point and it must not be changed just to suit some members of Team Green on the Council. Speaking rights are not acceptable round the Council table. We must have a vote. 42 P Jones I believe the ward system gives Geraldine the best representation available. I have been a Geraldine resident for 32 years. As a member of several organisations, especially the Geraldine Museum which is run entirely by volunteers. I feel disappointed by the lack of interest and support of the Timaru District Council. A council elected ‘at large’ would make this problem worse. As a ratepayer I would hope to have the same services as ratepayers in Timaru, Pleasant Point and Temuka – this is not always the case (E.g. footpaths, drainage, sports facilities). WE NEED GOOD VIGOROUS REPRESENTATION. 43 D Falconer I believe the community of interest is best services by the ward system of elections. 44 G&P Wills As Geraldine, like all small country towns, is unique in its own way and needs Councillors that understand and can argue for the betterment of our communities so we need to keep our Ward System. 45 K Falconer I believe the community of interest is best service by the ward system of elections. 46 12 L McGillen (summarised) My experience in local government backs the status quo. Urban versus rural animosity has been eliminated with ward system. Risk of political politics and block voting, stagnation on projects and feuds. Avoided in our area since the beginning and should not be allowed to creep in

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 14 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) the back door. 47 14 K Stevens (summarised) Submission 1: I support the initial proposal for a ward system. Reasons for support aligned to the Local Government Commission Guidelines for conducting Representation Reviews. These include: • Geraldine ward area meets all LGC’s criteria as a distinct and geographically identifiable community of interest • Geographical distribution of communities of interest results in layering effect with people living in southern area turning to Timaru city for daily needs, in the middle to Pleasant Point or Temuka and north to Geraldine. • Commonalities of interest are not identified and are a precursor to determining communities of interest • Distinct, geographically identifiable communities of interest suggests that wards are the most effective form of representation for these. A local Geraldine ward councillor provides best access for effective representation of Geraldine • Timaru District does not fit characteristics appropriate to an at large system. Opposed to at large system or possible mixed system. • Proposed system provides fair representation as required under Local Electoral Act. Timaru ward is likely to determine candidates elected under an at large system due to weight of numbers. • At large system likely to discriminate against candidates in two rural wards • Also support Community Board proposal due to equality of proposal and community board support of proposal. Submission 2: Addresses myth that at large increases proportion of rural representation. Argues at large representation in the only two “similar” electorates to TDC which have used an at large electoral system has resulted in fewer rural councillors and councillors who live much closer to the urban centre than currently occurs in Timaru District. 48 S Lake I wish to support the Ward System. Temuka is continuing to develop more industry. We need to encourage this further. We would benefit by having our own ward councillor. Our residential area certainly needs to have someone to

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 15 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) represent us to express our wishes on the ‘betterment’ of our local town. 49 H Muir I support the Ward based representation. It is important Geraldine has a vote on the Timaru District Council and not left to change via the ‘at large’ representative method. 51 A&A Wilson We, - (the above named – owners of two properties in Geraldine) strongly SUPPORT the current WARD SYSTEM to be re-engaged at the forthcoming elections.

Having resided in the town for six and a half years, we have been impressed with the current system, with our late Councillor; residing in our area; we were able to discuss various matters with him, when and where it was required, with on-the-spot access and knowledge from him. Local Councillor position is also important for all residents, both in and around our town to present any problems/accolades directly to them, especially when they live in the area – and to gain some rural representation on the Council.

Voting at the election is another area we find difficult, in that we do not really know the other candidates abilities or knowledge of the position they are seeking.

We respectfully support the ‘status-quo’. 52 M Gallagher In favour of ward system. Elect 9 councillors through he current ward structure. I support initial proposal of ward system for electing councillors. My reasons are: 1. Geraldine needs a local representative in their area. 2. Geraldine area needs someone in their community that they can easily access and liaise with. 3. It gives the community an interest in their local issues and a sense of belonging. 4. The proximity from Timaru is another reason why they should have a councillor in their area. So why change? 53 D Just leave our Wards alone and stop picking on Meiklejohn the Rural community. We carry enough of a burden without being stuffed around by you townies. Also, the wife and I are both ratepayers (the farm is joint ownership) and yet you only see fit to send out one submission form. Get it together!

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 16 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 54 J Jones I live in Geraldine. It is very important to our town that we have our own Councillor, who understands the needs of our unique town, and can be a strong voice at Council meetings. 55 Y Hohenberger I support the ward system and wish to see this continue. 56 A Hendriks We have a diverse district of country and town. This mod el best supports all parties/communities. Without representation of all parties grievances can arise due to lack of representation and understanding from leaders that do not understand areas or concerns that do not effect them or have knowledge of. 57 A Hendriks (no comments) 58 R Anderson Should be a local person representing a local township. 59 L Shannon Local voice in local government. Only a local person that knows the people and culture of the community can truly have our best interests and a passionate voice we need. 60 A Palmer To keep a local voice in local government. 61 C Lawrence The ward system works well so there is no need for change. We need to retain representation. 62 J Higgins Fairer representation for Temuka. 63 I Hoskin I submit that the ward system is a fair and simple system. 64 S McDonald Guaranteed vote for rural communities. So Temuka is not left out. To keep a local voice in local government. 65 H Cain To keep a local voice in local government otherwise we lose our town’s identity. 66 M McDowall The current ward structure provides effective representation of communities of interest. 67 D Heather To keep a local voice in local government. 68 D Hall To keep a voice in local government. 69 A Andreassend The surrounding areas need to have a voice in council and to keep local representation so rural areas don’t get forgotten. 70 C Geddis The Ward system retains geographical representation and keeps a local voice in local government. This is very important. 71 L Bolland Keep it local for Temuka. 72 R Wood To keep the voice of Temuka and other rural communities heard on the Council. 73 S McCully I believe it is essential that we have a local voice. I think its important there is a local person – that people can go to for help/advice. We need to protect our rural community with a Councillor ‘on the ground’.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 17 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 74 Janneen The ward system ensures a balanced urban – rural representation. Keep it local. 75 B Coochey The ward system retains geographical representation. 76 P Frew To keep a local government. 77 R Manson Keep a local voice. 78 L Young Prefer it to stay as it is, as at the moment we have someone local representing us and our area. 79 K Sullivan We need local representation on the Council so that we get things done in our area. 80 L Aitken To keep a local voice in local government. 81 V Kirkcaldie The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. 82 S Brodie Without a ward system the area has very little representation. 83 L Price To keep a local voice in local government. 84 R Tarrant The ward system works well so there is no need to change. 85 K Bridge It gives communities a voice and therefore more feeling of involvement in District Council decisions. 86 S Hansen How dare a city “Timaru” based people make a decision on how our representation will work. We do not believe they will provide enough ‘voice’ for our concerns and issues.

87 L Frisby The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table. 88 T Store To keep a local voice in local government. 89 B Wilson The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. 90 A Gregan We need local people representing our area. 91 P Wallace To keep a local voice in local government. 92 L Brosnahan To keep a local voice in local government. 93 A Hollows The ward system works well so there is no need for changes. 94 A Moreland To keep a local voice in local government. 95 J Cannon I believe all local bodies should have a voice in the local government. 96 L Fryer To keep a local voice in local government. 97 O MacLeod The ward system ensures a balanced urban rural representation. To keep a local voice in local government. 98 M Webb Fair representation for rural community. 99 K Beeby The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table. 100 S Foxcroft The ward system ensures a balanced urban rural representation. 101 ME Brogden The ward system works well, why change it.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 18 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 102 M Higinbottom The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for the rural communities at the Council table. 103 B Burt Keep the Rural Vote. 104 J Ogg We wish to keep the ward system, as it gives us our local representative, who is more aware of the issue for our district. 105 E Jones The ward system works well why change it. 106 J Bray Keep the rural vote. 107 N Brookland To keep a local voice in local government 108 D Scannell The ward system ensures a balanced urban-rural representation. 109 B Haar Ward System protects vote for rural communities of interest. 110 C Jelley The ward system ensures a balanced urban-rural rep. 111 M Franklin The system works why change it. 112 J Perry To keep a local voice in local government. 113 P Fitzgerald I want the ward system works so there is no need for change. 114 P Symes Need a rural spokesman. 115 J Webb Guaranteed votes for rurals. 116 K Stevens Temuka requires a voice which it will not have with the current alternative proposals. The council needs to have a selection/variety of people from all areas of our district not just from Timaru. 117 K Woodley Fairness to all and a rural voice! 118 K Manson Keep local voice in local government. 119 W Harding Independence is good. 120 S Everett Independence. 121 R Will The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. We need to be heard!! 122 D Mullen The outskirts of Timaru are part of South Canterbury and should be included. 123 S Hansen To keep a local voice in Local Government. The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table. 124 R Cross The wards system works well so there is no need for change. 125 N Cross The ward system ensures a balanced urban – rural representation. 126 F Horgan Keep a local voice. Rural needs to be represented! 127 B Pagan We want to be represented at a local area and 1 Councillor for Geraldine, 2 for Temuka/Pleasant Point. To keep a local voice. 128 P Wood The Ward System works well so there is no need for change.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 19 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 129 C Neame The ward system ensures a fair and balanced urban-rural representation. 130 L Oliver (no comments) 131 S (no comments) McLachlan 132 P Coates To keep a local voice in Local Gov. 133 S Powell The current system is perfect. 134 R Taylor Ward system retains geographical representation. 135 A Wilson Need a local voice in local government. 136 D Lister Fair representation as assured after the merger with Geraldine Country Council also because Timaru district has a large proportion of rateable farmland to represent this area is very important. 137 S Wills To keep a local voice in local govt. 138 J Peneamene The ward system ensures a balanced urban-rural representation. 139 H Steel To keep a local voice in Local Government. 140 S Wraight I want Temuka to have a representative on council for sure. 141 J Woodley To keep a local voice in local government. 142 V Hatton To keep a local voice in Local Government.

143 H Thomas Current ward structure provides effective representation of Communities of Interest. 144 J Ross We all need Local and Rural Support. 145 S Hanifin So we have local people speaking up for the local Community. 146 J Pomana Support local ward so that we get local voice. 147 F Tocher Work OK as is. 148 G Hargreaves I wish to register my support for the continuing system on council whereby Geraldine Pleasant Point and Temuka have their own representatives. Country voters are fast losing their representation though they produce 65% of the country's income. 149 B McEwen I believe that the rural towns and areas need representation from people in those areas. 150 M&A Davis We wish to support the motion to retain the existing ward system for voting for next year’s election 156 J O’Halloran Having moved here from Auckland some years ago I have found the spirit of the community which enables all the residents of small areas to feel they have a full contribution into how their community is maintained to ensure the benefits of living in a satellite area are maintained. Having people from within the community advocating for the specific requirements is of unfathomable value for the inhabitants who live in these areas

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 20 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) where they work, do business at the local shops and banks, send their kids to the local schools and have the use of sporting facilities that have the local people’s works and needs taken into account. To lose the ability to have direct representation of these communities on the councils of bigger enterprises would be disastrous for small villages that rely on the informed knowledge of their representatives to ensure the continuation of the good services historically provided by these local citizens. 157 A Morland The ward system works well so there is no need for change 158 L Prentice To keep a local voice in Local Government 159 D Cotter To keep a local voice in Local Government 160 R Barker To keep a local voice in Local Government 161 G Manson To keep a local voice in Local Government. As person who lives in our area and has an interest in our town. 162 G Howey The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system 163 B Cunningham The ward system retains geographical representation 164 D Bagrie The current ward structure provides effective representation of communities of interest 165 J Voice This works well now, don’t need to change 166 D Miles The current ward structure provides effective representation of communities of interest – the ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 167 R Hanifin We need our local voice and our say in our town 168 C Peneamene We need to keep the ward system so the rural communities can be heard by our local MPs and our local councils. This is vital to have a fair system for all communities. 169 J Eddington The ward system provides a vote for our rural community – we need to be able to have our say through our local voice 170 N Dippie Need our local voice and must be kept democratic with even representation for all 171 T Lorimer The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table 172 S Trukawka The ward structure is a fair and balanced simple system. To keep a local voice in Local Government. The Ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table. The ward system retains geographical representation. 173 K Williams The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 21 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) representation. To keep a local voice in Local Government. 174 A Talbot The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table, reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in Local Government, works well so there is no need to change it and retains geographical representation. 175 Mr&Mrs cStay To keep local voice in government. 176 R Stone To keep local voices in our local Government 177 M Pomana So people in small areas all (people) can voice their opinion on what is happening in the community 178 K Robertson To keep local voice in local government. Why fix something that’s not broken, it works well as it is at the moment. 179 B McCully The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at Council table. The ward system reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. The Strathallan County agreed to merger a fair representation not what is being proposed to change. Strongly for continuation of ward system. 180 P Hogg The ward structure is the only way. 181 A Hogg The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities of interest. 182 C&T Keep the ward. Stringer 183 B Eddington The present system is working well, no need for change. It is fair and ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 184 J Pow To keep a local voice in local government. 185 B South The ward system works well so why change it. 186 M Prentice The ward system reflects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 187 C Jones No taxation without representation. This is one of our founding laws. 188 B Healey We need the one-on-one support as they know what is going on locally. One has to live at the place to know what is going on and be there for the people. 189 D Status quo should remain. Brosnahan 190 H Bray The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 191 H Belworthy To keep a local voice on local government. 192 D Millan The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. 193 L Baird Keep the status quo.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 22 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 194 S&K Connolly Keep it the way it is. The ward system provides effective representation of communities of interest. 195 E Gillum The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 196 J Mackinnon Ward system is fair, balanced simple system. 197 D The ward structure is fair, balanced and simple Mackinnon system. 198 K Dawkins The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table 199 E Smith Support the status quo. No need to change. 200 L Spillane The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 201 J Gilkison A need for local representation needs to be upheld. To keep a local voice in local government. 202 C Gould The ward system looks after country as well as town. 203 D Crisp The ward system retains a fair system. 204 L Sullivan Guaranteed vote for rural communities 205 H Mackle The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities of interest. 206 D Quigley The ward structure is a fair and balanced and simple system. 207 K Searle Ward system to remain. Ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 208 P Harris The ward system works well so there is no need for change. 209 J&J Gresham Keep a local voice in local government 210 M Bowler Change for the sake of change is a mistake. Smaller communities are just as entitled to local representation as larger cities. We pay rates for city swimming pools so should have a voice. 211 E Bisdee If we lose our local representatives we lose our identity. Why change what is working well. 212 M Pierce To keep the ward system for the rural vote. 213 C Borninly Keep separate votes for rural communities. 214 J Bisdee Why change what ain’t broke! Do not take rural representatives away from the districts. No-one knows what the rural communities need than those that live there. 215 33 I Morten (summarised) Support the ward system for electing nine Councillors. This: • Guarantees the three rural wards/areas have full representation at the Council table • Rural wards are clear communities of interest • Provide 40% of rate take and encompass 75% of the area covered by the Council and any electoral system without Council

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 23 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) representation would be a dereliction of Council’s fiduciary duty. • Oppose other options as rural ward voters will be swamped by large votes from Timaru ward, distorting balance of representational power to Timaru. 216 C Scarsbrook Ward system works excellently. Why change it. Need a rural vote. 217 M Mason It ties the councillor(s) to the area that serves the area (ward) in a way that helps prevent the councillor(s) becoming political weather vanes without regard to the people they are supposed to represent.

218 A Godfrey The ward system works well so there is no need for change. 219 M Mawhinney I want retain as is - representation. 220 R Burgess The ward system works well so no need for changes. 221 H Thin Works well why change it. 222 J Frisby Have a local voice. 223 M Pow Rural areas need a true representative. 224 G Vee The ward system works well. No need to change. 225 H Moss We need to keep our rural voice. 226 G Abraham The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 227 J Pearce The ward system works well and there is no need for change. The Ward system retains geographical representation. 228 T Russell The current ward system structure provides effective representation of communities of interest. “If it ain’t broke why fix the bleeding thing” 229 N Prentice Why change something that works. 230 W&O Price The ward structure is a fair balanced and simple system. To keep a local voice in local government. 231 P O’Sullivan The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 232 A Edwin The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. I agree with all the points made in this petition, especially keeping politics out of local government and retention of local representation for the good of local communities. 233 N Hawke The ward system works well so there is no need

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 24 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) for change! 234 J Burleigh- Leave as it is! Roake 235 B Townshend Keep a local voice in government. 236 M Talbot The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it. 237 S Antoine The ward system ensures a balance urban/rural representation. 238 M Oldfield The ward system retains geographical representation. 239 E Pearce To keep a local voice in local government. 240 ` R Clarkson The ward system reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government and also keeps a balanced urban/rural representation which is vital to the makeup of this region. 241 R Frisby The system works well as it is so there is no need to change it. 242 J Flaming The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. It reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. To keep a local voice in local government. 243 S Smith The present ward system works well at present and allows a local voice in local government. Is less likely to be dominated by political persuasion. 244 N Julius Small towns need a choice in our own community for our own projects and town growth. 245 T Reid That the system right now is fair, if we change, the rural and urban point of view will not get across. Temuka is looking like a ghost town now. Imagine if it changes it will look even worse. 246 L Scott The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. We need “Temuka people” at the council table who care about the future developments of Temuka. 247 S Beckett This big brother tactics was tried in the UK years ago to push the small towns out of a vote. “It did not work”. We are all part of the Council area and need to work as a team for the good of South Canterbury. So don’t forget we are all part of the family. 248 P Frisby The ward system works well so there is no need for change. 249 34 N Horgan (summarised) Support the proposal to elect nine Councillors through the current ward system. Reasons include Timaru ward system has not suffered through the current electoral system with Deputy Mayors elected from rural wards, reduces risk of party politics, no need for change, local

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 25 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) knowledge and balanced urban-rural representation. Total number of Councillors not a concern as long as elected wards representation remains. 250 R Taipana Guarantee my interests are presented as a rural rate payer. My community needs are represented. Local issues voiced in local govt platform. Gives control to people that live here. 251 T Lester Ward system works well. 252 T David Ward structure is fair and balanced. 253 T Louden To have someone from Temuka to be involved in our area. 254 M Morrison For local representation and make sure he or she is seen about town and district. Not sitting on bum at meetings only or sleeping. 255 Mr&Mrs Francis Should be fair. Not just Timaru. 256 P Lysaght The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 257 J Howard I disagree with councillors ceasing. 258 S Roberts I think it is vital for the smaller communities especially to be represented well as they know their town the best. 259 J Wood If it isn’t broke why change it. I find the ward system as we have it, quite satisfactory. 260 T King That we continue to have someone on the Council that understands the needs and wants of the community in which they live. 261 L Smith Keep support local. 262 S Sheed We need a voice in the rural area. 263 T McCully The ward system reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. 264 G McCully The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table. It works well so there is no need for change. 265 L Simpson Keep as is thank you. 266 A Smith Democratic Representation. 267 T Nelson Democratic representation for Temuka and surrounding areas. 268 S Brookland We do not lose our voice in Temuka. 269 A Johnson To keep local voice in local government. 270 D Johnston (no comments) 271 D Foster (no comments) 272 E Solomon (no comments) 273 J Torepo (no comments) 274 T O’Connor (no comments) 275 W Maybee (no comments) 276 N Dale (no comments) 277 M White (no comments) 278 S Coughlan (no comments)

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 26 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 279 R Harrison (no comments) 280 V Schischko (no comments) 281 B Stonehouse (no comments) 282 A Sinclair (no comments) 283 P Love (no comments) 284 S Keeley (no comments) 285 B Mccambridge (no comments) 286 J Reihana (no comments) 287 N Priddle (no comments) 288 J Ross (no comments) 289 R Heke (no comments) 290 B Jones (no comments) 291 M Scott (no comments) 292 W Baker (no comments) 293 B Niles (no comments) 294 B Glass (no comments) 295 G Kake (no comments) 296 C Stanway (no comments) 297 B O’Brien (no comments) 298 C Patmore (no comments) 299 L Lee (no comments) 300 W Bell (no comments) 301 R Gualter (no comments) 302 J Charlesworth (no comments) 303 O (no comments) Henderson 304 B Sherriff (no comments) 305 Z Waaka- (no comments) Mateha 306 J Talbot (no comments) 307 A Riddoch (no comments) 308 G Granger (no comments) 309 R Ellen (no comments) 310 35 L Sullivan (summarised) Important for small town to have voice in local government. Reduces risk of party politics in local government. Even under present system small towns struggle for fair deal as indicated by stroll down main street - If bollard knocked over in Timaru would it be fixed in three days or three months. Local Councillor serves Temuka well. Councillors should work for good of all Timaru district. 311 S Rooney To keep a local voice in local government. So the ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. 312 F Helm We need to keep a local voice in local government. The current structure is fair and simple. Don’t change it.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 27 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 313 K Julius Temuka needs a voice. 314 I Clarkson The ward system works well so there is no need for change. The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 315 S Gilkison The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. The district council should have a voice from all areas of the district. 316 I Clarkson The ward system works well so there is no need for change. 317 M Clarkson The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 318 B Shepherd The ward system works well so there is no need for change. 319 A Smith I would like to see every town to have their own candidate to relate to. 320 S Monk (no comments) 321 R Love I also wish to retain the elect 9 system vote with the ward structure, otherwise country folk often lose their say when things that concern us will be often overlooked. 322 J Booth The ward system has worked well for many years so why change it. 323 S Booth The current ward structure provides effective representation of communities of interest. 324 A McCully We should retain the representative in council so our district has a say in proceedings and a voice for our area. 325 B McCully We should retain the representative in council so our district has a say in proceedings and a voice for our area. 326 P Sullivan The ward system works well so there is no need to change. 327 P Hogg Our towns need a voice. 328 J Cullimore Ward system. 329 D Timothy To get more things done. Thanks 330 A Stafford Our small communities need a voice. 331 W Love I want to retain our rural voice so we can take our issues and concerns into the council with a vote. 332 S Berry An area should have individual representation as that person knows what is happening in that area and it is also someone to liaise with. 333 A Armishaw The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at Council table 334 J Fitzsimons We live rural between Temuka/Pleasant Point and operate a business in Geraldine. We regularly interact and communicate with our ward councillors who understand rural issues. It is very important as they are a vital part of our community with the interest of smaller

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 28 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) communities at heart. They are a face at the council who you can talk to and discuss issues. The ward system works and doesn’t need changing. 335 R Rooney The ward system works well so I feel there is no need to change it. 336 S Crichton (no comments) 337 T Wilson To retain Temuka’s voice through local representation. 338 T McLeay Don’t want any change. 339 S Leonard Rural areas need to have a voice. 340 D Smith Keep local representation. 341 D The ward system retains geographical McLachlan representation. 342 R Walker To ensure representation for smaller communities. 343 D Darby (no comments) 344 D Galbraith (no comments) 345 R Cavanagh (no comments) 346 M Davies (no comments) 347 E (no comments) McLachlan 348 V Dean (no comments) 349 R Scott (no comments) 350 S Hewson (no comments) 351 S Nally (no comments) 352 L Styles (no comments) 353 B Seymour (no comments) 354 G Fisher (no comments) 355 D Tuite (no comments) 356 R Baucke (no comments) 357 B Stockwell (no comments) 358 L Johnson (no comments) 359 L Hill (no comments) 360 J Marriott (no comments) 361 K Lei (no comments) 362 M Donehue (no comments) 363 R Hanson (no comments) 364 M Haughey (no comments) 365 M Bullard (no comments) 366 J Foster (no comments) 367 L Uren (no comments) 368 R Milligan (no comments) 369 K Pace (no comments) 370 S Fitzgerald The current ward structure provides effective representation of communities of interest. We need to keep local government local. 371 S Gray We need to retain local representation to keep a local voice in local government.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 29 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 372 J Donaldson Keep local voice in government. 373 B Breeze (no comments) 374 H Reuben (no comments) 375 R Cooper (no comments) 376 R Lapham (no comments) 377 J O’Toole (no comments) 378 M Gundersen (no comments) 379 D Priddle (no comments) 380 B Smith The ward system works well so there is no need to change. 381 J Gibson The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 382 S Heaphy The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 383 C Quigley We wish to keep local representation going. 384 S Smith I believe we need to continue to have rural representation and we would be disadvantaged by any other option. 385 G South To keep a local voice in local government. 386 D Local representation required. Winkelman 387 M Douglas The ward system retains geographical representation! 388 R Thomas We need a representative from our area to take our local needs to the council–otherwise we can be forgotten. 389 M A voice from Temuka to speak for Temuka. Armstrong 390 A Marshall Current ward structure provides effective representation of communities of interest. 391 P Grossman It’s important to have a local voice in local government. 392 J Clarke The ward system works well so there is no need for change. To keep local government local. 293 H Cameron Temuka needs to be represented by local people – this must be guaranteed in light of the fact that Temuka was a stand-alone community. After amalgamation our rights have not always been upheld so this is one time that they must be. It is a democracy issue. If this can’t happen then quite simply - the biggest ‘earner’ in SC - needs once again to stand alone! 394 E Hullen We need to keep our representatives. 395 H Tarrant Status quo. 396 T Smith Temuka needs a voice in Council. 397 J Barnett The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. The ward system works well so why change it. 398 A McLean We want geographical reps and the present

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 30 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) system is a fair one.

399 A McLean The ward system provides effective representation of communities of interest. 400 E Heatlie Temuka/Geraldine need to be represented. 401 A Prue Keep it local and the same. 402 P Campbell If it isn’t broke don’t fix it. 403 J Robertson Not broken – Don’t fix it. 404 M Dolan The ward system works so very well so there is no need to change it. 405 F Harlen To keep a local voice in local government. 406 P Watson The ward system works so well why change it. 407 A Jones The ward system works well so there is no need to change. 408 L Stevenson The ward system works well so why keep changing things. 409 P Wallis The ward system works well so there is no need to change. 410 H Peacock The ward system retains geographical representation. 411 C King Things are working well so why bother changing. 412 E Cockburn I feel the system works better with local people from the area as they live in and know the area. 413 R Jones The ward system works well and no need to change it. 414 D Sharpe The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 415 L Caldwell The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 416 P&B Atkins Our submission is that council be elected in terms of the draft proposal i.e. Mayor elected at large with 9 councillors elected through 3 wards (1 in Geraldine ward, 2 in Pleasant Point/Temuka ward and 6 in Timaru ward). There is merit in the idea of dividing Timaru into wards as well which could be considered next time a review is due. 417 P&S Goodwin We have lived in rural Temuka since 1981. Over those years we have realised the importance of having a local councillor to contact regarding local issues. Many times we have contacted our local councillor regarding matters which have affected us living in the country (in particular roading and drainage) always with a positive outcome. If the present structure is changed we may not have a local councillor who has knowledge of our local area. Since the amalgamation of councils into the Timaru District Council we have seen a considerable decline in the services to rural areas - this will continue to decline if we do not have a

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 31 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) local representative on the council who can advocate on our behalf. 418 N Rae In my opinion Council – 3 wards, electing 1 councillor each from Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point (not 2 from Pleasant Point/Temuka). Community Boards – 3 community boards electing a total of 18 members, 6 from each ward and 2 members appointed in each of Geraldine, Pleasant Point and Temuka. 419 G&M Chapman Geoff and I (Margaret) strongly believe that the current ward system on the TDC is fair and working well. Until January this year, Geoff lived all his life in the Pleasant Point area, as I did for 49 years. Rural representation on ALL local boards and councils is absolutely vital. Many issues arise which affect rural folk and Councillors from rural wards can ensure that these are considered. We believe that some urban councillors do not look at the wider picture – thinking of the city concerns only. If we voted for 10 Councillors at large, there is no surety that we would have any rural representation at all. What a disaster! Please leave our current ward system in place. 420 B Please give country folk a voice on council. Mawhinney 421 W Whitmore Every area we have needs to have support! How can someone represent an area they don’t live in. 422 A O’Brien As someone who has lived in the Geraldine district for nearly 40 years, I feel strongly that we need a member on the council who represents Geraldine. We have had that representation since the ward system was introduced and I see no good reason to change it. It is important that Geraldine, along with Temuka and Pleasant Point, have a local representative on the council who can be approached if needed and will have an intimate knowledge of the area and can respond accordingly. I believe that retaining the ward system gives a good rural/urban mix on the council and reduces the chance of a particular group with an agenda dominating proceedings. 423 S Finnie Local councillors are more in tune and step on local issues because they have a vested interest in Geraldine. They are also more accessible to Geraldine residents and understand the history of the town (generally). 424 A Curry I feel that the culture of town v country is still too far entrenched to dilute country representation by

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 32 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) electing councillors at large. 425 J&N I am concerned at the proposed changes to our Knowles representation on the Timaru District Council. Why change when it works well at the moment. 426 J Hume No further comments required thank you. 427 W Smith To keep fair representation of rural and urban areas. Country areas lost their individual administrations to the present situation ending the ward system could easily leave them without representation.

428 I McKinlay I very strongly support with one councillor for our Geraldine ward and two councillors for the Temuka-Pleasant Point ward. Also I support the present arrangement for the three community board system. 429 R Tegelaars (no comments) 430 M Matheson The ward system guaranteed vote for rural communities at council table. It reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. It is a fair and balanced system. 431 A Brown We all identify best with people we know or know of. Our rural people need rural people to represent them. Timaru only exists because of the farming community around us. Therefore, it is imperative that these committees have direct representation from their own district. 432 H Chellew (no comments) 433 H O’Brien I support the current ward system. 1. It is important Geraldine has a fair representation on the council which could be lost with the at large system 2. It is important to have a balance of rural-urban representation 3. Why change the current system when it is working well. It is fair and well balanced. 4. It is important for a councillor to understand the district and to be available to the locals for consultation 5. Geraldine’s needs could be forgotten in the at large scheme 434 J Phillips It is very important to have the certainty of a representative who lives in or near to Temuka and has a good knowledge of the area. So often residents of country areas and the small towns have to wait for attention until someone is in the area with a cluster of enquiries to deal with. In a town with a large proportion of elderly people not everyone can travel easily to Timaru.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 33 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 435 S Representation from the three wards allows local McKerchar knowledge to represent the voice of the people at council and to speed up decisions. 436 H Ingle My submission is that Geraldine retains the present system as a separate ward. I feel that larger is not always better. 437 L Fallon It is most important that the small towns within the Timaru area retain autonomy and therefore there should definitely be continuance of the ward system. 438 37 R Morten (summarised) Support the current ward system for representation, for following reasons: 1. Geraldine is a very clear community of interest – Geraldine people consider their local hub is Geraldine – shopping, education, sport, social, special interest groups etc. Ward is a large rural area. 2. Geraldine people are entitled to have access to their elected representatives – important for residents to have access to Councillors 3. Geraldine ward is different to the rest of the Timaru District – has a rural base. Large land area. Need local representation and someone who understands local issues. LGC guidelines states wards appropriate in areas where there are a number of distinct geographically identifiable communities of interest. This also applies to Pleasant Point and Temuka areas. Also support proposal re Community Boards. 439 S Croft Rural areas need local councillors, representatives and supporters to accurately and fairly project the needs and concerns of the community. 440 J Roberts I fully support the above draft proposal as adopted by the Council. 441 P Lewis (no comments)

442 A Agnew I wish to add my support to retaining the ward system. Living in Pleasant Point I feel our representation by a local person well aware of the area is of extreme importance. In the last month we have had a problem affecting three properties support from our local representative was paramount, some who understood and was prepared to help. I would hate to think we would lose the support and understanding we now experience. 443 D France I believe the ward system of election gives the

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 34 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) fairest representation on Council for all ratepayers. 444 L Chaney It is completely unacceptable for a council to demand rates from Geraldine and then to deny them representation on said Council. We live in a democracy, it is long past time the Council remembered they are a district council not a city council. We demand that the current ward system is maintained. 445 TC Brewer Support the current ward structure. 446 S Craigie Geraldine rate payers contribute significantly to TDC. Geraldine needs a voice so that it can receive funding for roads and improvements in the Geraldine area. I live on a gravel road and the grader now comes very infrequently to maintain it. If there is no Geraldine voice at TDC level I feel that essential services in our area will be lost. 447 R Ackland Snr Geraldine needs its own representative. We need somebody who understands the initiatives and who feels passionate about Geraldine and its outer environs which extends up the Mesopotamia. 448 B&J Chisholm Geraldine needs a vote at council meetings. It was promised at the amalgamation when we lost our Strathallan County Council. 449 F Bowey I wish to support the initial proposal (the ward system). I feel having lived in Geraldine for 29 years it is imperative we have a representative in council. 450 C Bowey I wish to support the initial proposal (the ward system). Geraldine is a busy little town and needs a representative in Council because of our location. 451 B Petrie Having had some experience on (1) Timaru local council (1 term), (2) Timaru High School Board of Governors (about 12 years+) (3) Timaru Harbour Board (about 17 years) and (4) Commissioner TGHS; I am satisfied contributions made (in 2, 3 & 4) by ‘country’ members were of considerable value – Generally providing a balanced but progressive approach. The Timaru City Council proceedings were narrowly focused and borne down by the officers with councillors succumbing to pressure rather than looking at the broader picture and potential. Further the earlier suggested exclusion of rural interests would be contrary to the spirit of cooperation which was sold as part of the amalgamation of City and Counties and the boroughs of Temuka and Geraldine.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 35 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 452 D France I believe the ward system of election gives a fair representation on council for all ratepayers. 453 DC Bell I believe the rural voice should be retained based on their different approach and experience. 454 M Fitzgerald As a ratepayer I support the above draft proposal. Hopefully the ward system stays as above as I feel that being from Temuka it is most important there is a speaking person on the council and also from Pleasant Point and Geraldine too. These areas must not become voiceless in the needs of their requirements, as part of their rate payments must be spent in their areas on general upkeep as has been carried out in the past. Local members who know the people and the area they represent are most important for all the area. 455 J Parsloe & We support the current ward system i.e. the S Strang- retention of the Geraldine representative. Parloe 456 M Temple & We believe we in Geraldine are better served by A South having a local ward councillor from Geraldine as our representative on the TDC. 457 EM Reilly 1. I believe it is very important for residents of the Geraldine ward to have a direct voice to the council. 2. Geraldine has its own special needs due to its population makeup and location. 3. I believe the current system has been effective. 458 38 W Raymond (summarised) QSO Support present ward structure. At large option risks no Councillors elected from rural wards. Ian Bowan comments pinpoint foremost argument in support of present system being if it is running well, you don’t need to fix it. Rural ratepayers clearly do not want change and would prefer certainty of a Councillor elected from their midst who understands issues and concerns of community. Current representation review risks undoing goodwill of the last 20 years or so. Number of outstanding Councillors elected from rural wards over the years, who under an at large system may not have been elected. Agree with Kerry Stevens analysis of issues. 459 W Phillips 1. It ensures the smaller towns are represented and have a vote on council. 2. It is the most equable way of ensuring a uniform number of residents to each councillor. 3. No taxation without representation. 4. It gives a reduced risk of party voting on the

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 36 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) council. 5. Councillors should be resident in the area they represent. 6. Local government must be local. 460 J&J Leishman We are very much in favour of retaining our present ward system as regards the TDC. Our local representative who is very much familiar with our district is more beneficial to our needs than would be a complete stranger coming into the scene with little knowledge of our area. Local knowledge is paramount. You need to live in that area to know how ‘it ticks’ We do not have a level playing field as regards voting for our representative at large because of our lesser population and it would therefore be impossible to get our representative onto the Council. Putting aside our lower population we are never the less an asset to the District Council and need to be treated fairly. We fully endorse Mayor Janie Annear’s comments where she believed it was really important that the balance between rural and urban be retained on the Council (Timaru Herald 19.9.2012 Page 1). Please don’t underestimate Geraldine, we will not stand for anything less than we have now. 461 D Auld Help protect, support, understand and listen to our local towns. Ward system designed to do this. Vital we have this or we are all lost in corporate world of local politics. 462 C Johnson The ward system works well so there is no need for change and it reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. The ward system is a fair, balanced and simple system. 464 J Newton I think the Geraldine area contributes greatly to the ability of South Canterbury (as a whole) to attract people to this district – both as residents and tourists. Therefore, we deserve good strong representation on the Council. We have been extremely well represented by Michael Oliver and we all feel bereft at his sudden death. His contribution to the Council on Geraldine’s behalf will be sorely missed!! The older generation will notice that ‘things’ don’t get done here quite so easily*. It would be terrible to lose the representation we have now so please make sure that we do have the representation mooted in Public Notice 6.0. *This is in regard to Geraldine being run independently by its own council

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 37 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 465 J Martin In supporting the above proposal I feel that it is vital for the whole of the district to have their local representatives on Council. It didn’t take long for the new boys to let us know what they were up to! 466 Gilmour We feel it is important to retain the current system Family which gives some representation to the smaller townships within the area. 467 N Faulks-Beck I am strongly opposed to your proposal of electing councillors at large. May main reason being we, as in Geraldine, could end up with all TDC councillors on our district council which would leave out Geraldine area very much out on a limb with little or no voice. Also feel the rural areas of Geraldine would have a very weak voice. Our community of interest are very important. Our community boards seem to work well but would like to see them have more input into decision making, also we could be better served by having two councillors as we are a very large area and our population is growing all the time. 468 J Hammond (no comments) 469 N Newton (no comments) 470 F Gresham I am in support of the Council’s initial option which is to elect 9 councillors through the current ward structure as this give a fair representation of all within the district. In Geraldine we are appreciative of the premise “to act locally and to think globally”. We appreciate ready access to our local representatives who are mindful of local issues. Representatives need to know how the community ticks. 471 B Phiskie I wish to forward a submission to support the draft proposal as adopted by the Council. I believe it is vital for the rural areas to be represented on Council with full voting rights as it is only by living in the area that the true needs and problems of the area can be understood. This should also help prevent the likelihood of political parties entering Council as a group. 472 L Collins I oppose the ‘at large’ system as it would not really benefit Geraldine. Having just speaking rights at council meetings and not a vote seems unfair to me. Having representatives in the Geraldine ware would be an asset to the district as a whole. 473 A Ross I would like you to accept submission as support for the current ward system. I have lived in Geraldine for 15 years and have been totally happy with the ward system. I have a small business that I run from my home and also a past

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 38 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) president, swimming coach and avid supporter of Geraldine swimming club. Past history shows that it is very import that Geraldine business, sporting and cultural clubs have the support of a local councillor who is interested in the day to day running of Geraldine and not just the political interest that the media pick up on. Geraldine is an idyllic place. One of our greatest attributes is that it is situated on the main tourist highway. So it is very important that we keep our own identity. 474 N Hind Geraldine is a big enough community to have one councillor for the town. Because there have been times when there has been only one name for Geraldine folk to vote for means we are happy with that one person -Michael Oliver for instance. With the population difference between Timaru and Geraldine we would never get a councillor on the council if we had the 10 at large because Timaru people wouldn’t know the Geraldine candidate. Our representative needs to live locally so they know the area. If the ward system isn’t “broke” don’t try to fix it PLEASE. I am getting older and don’t want to have to travel to Timaru to talk with a councillor. If I phone on council business the call costs 40 cents a minute. 475 B Bisdee 1. Rural residents must have contact with what the Council is doing. 2. The need for a rep. Sitting amidst the problems and having input. 3. The ward system has been successful 4. Surely it is fair for the major ratepayers to be represented 5. Ensures a balance around the boardroom 6. The stability of country members far outweighs the crazy ideas of these unstable new members of our last election who seem to disregard the strength of our rural support – rates and always being available when help needed. 476 P I own my own home but am on a benefit and Williamson having a councillor in Geraldine is important to me. This would be important as a councillor in Geraldine would be easier to contact than ones in Timaru as I do not have a car or drive and to be able to contact someone in Geraldine would be important to me. 477 42 A Gemmell (summarised) . No authentic reason why present system should be changed. Essential a unity of purpose exists to meld three differing regions into on successful

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 39 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) local government body. Change to at large would be disruptive and unnecessary. Essential for good communication, trust and respect all round and wards maintained as they are. Rural Councillors well known to electors. No place for disruptive party politics. 478 44 D&S Brown (summarised) Support the council representation levels to remain as they are. Elected representatives from our area doing an excellent job representing us. Rural lifestyle is different to a town lifestyle and rural areas best represented by a person who lives in the area and has an affinity with the people and the issues that arise. 479 WG Beck I am strongly opposed to your proposal of electing councillors at large. Main reason being we as in Geraldine, could end up with all Timaru city councillors on our district council which would leave our Geraldine area very much out on a limb, with little or no voice, also feel the rural areas of Geraldine would have very weak voice. Our community of interests are very important. Our community boards seem to work well but would like to see them have more input into decision making, also we could be better served by having two councillors as we are a very large area and our population is growing all the time, we could be above the 10% threshold. 480 V Eynon The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. The ward system ensures urban/rural representation. The 3 smaller townships and surrounding districts need representation, the open voting system does not necessarily provide for that opportunity. The ward system retains geographical representation.

481 J Johnson The community councils along with our local representatives are an important part of the rural community, therefore, it is important they remain part of the TDC. After all it is a ‘district’ council. Perhaps it may be a good time to think about going back to the ratepayers having the votes! 482 G Burgess I believe in the ward system, it gives us a rural vote in council. The communities are an important part of our district council. It is only fair that we can also keep a local voice in local government. 483 E Saunders No valid reason to change current system which has served well for many years.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 40 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 484 N Robertson A local voice is an important part of the district council. Rural councillors understand better the requirements of the rural districts they represent and are more available when it comes to matters concerning ratepayers in their communities. The rural rates make up a significant part of the district council income and a steadying influence over where this is targeted when it comes to discretionary spending would be ensured by having a balanced view from rural councillors. A rural councillor reflects the interests of the local community boards and at this stage is the only person who can debate the relevant issues at council meetings. In my view the rural voice should make up 50% of the council. 486 K Van Zeyl I believe that Geraldine needs to have a representation for the needs of Geraldine and have a voice as we are not Timaru. Therefore, I do consider it is appropriate that there is a ward for Geraldine. 487 R Davidson Keep present system. 488 W Selwood I support the proposal that the ward system be retained and reject the “at large” initial one. Local representation is essential to ensure the Council is a district one and not just for Timaru. Geraldine pays the highest rates in the district and has just had the biggest increase in rates. We absolutely expect representation and not just “speaking rights” without a vote. Some councillors certainly have agendas of their own and in showing their hand we now know who to vote for. 490 H&P Neill Geraldine needs a representative member on the TDC otherwise Geraldine rate payers will only become a cash cow for Timaru. 491 KJ Lynn (no comments) 492 D MacLeod I wish to retain the current ward system which I think gives Timaru district’s satellite towns a fairer representation on the Council. I also think the ward councillors should live in the area they represent. The satellite towns are largely rural and the rural voice should be heard as well as the Timaru voice. 493 D The country areas of the TDC must have MacKenzie representation. At least 40% of the TDC annual rates come from the rural sector of South Canterbury. As rural ratepayers within the Geraldine area, with the proposed change we will not have a voice representing this area. Geraldine is a vital contributor to the Timaru district. 494 D Reid Not broken, don’t fix it. No need for change.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 41 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 495 B Hansen Not broken, don’t fix it. No need for change. 496 N Scarsbrook Geraldine is in a no win situation as we are outvoted by Timaru. Promise after promise has been broken since amalgamation. Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point have their own pools, yet we must contribute to an over budget Timaru pool. Leave Geraldine to run Geraldine affairs. 497 M MacKenzie The country areas of the TDC must have representation. More than 40% of TDC annual rates come from the rural and business sector of South Canterbury. As rural ratepayers within the Geraldine area, with the proposed change we will not have a voice representing this area. Geraldine is a vital contributor to the Timaru district. 498 D MacLeod I believe councillors should reside in the community they represent which cannot be done by a centralised Council whose councillors may not even reside in the community they represent. 499 H van Zeyl I do believe Geraldine to have a representative in the Council one way or another as the community’s interests and needs vary considerably from Timaru. It being remote from Timaru is also a reason we should be able to communicate locally (not by phone or computer) to a local representative to convey our needs in this community which then in turn are voiced by our representative at TDC level effectively Therefore, I do consider it appropriate that there is a ward for Geraldine. 500 G Smith & We totally support the retention of the ward S Foley- system. Smith 501 B Te Koeti To retain the individual voices of the different parts of the district. Also retain independence in the political process. 502 B Te Koeti Rural representation is vital – no one understands country life like those who live there! The ward structure is the only way this can be assured and was guaranteed when Strathallan amalgamated with Timaru. Honour that commitment!! 503 B Milne Present ward system gives fair representation to both urban and rural ratepayers. A change to a whole district vote could bring party politics into the local council. Just because there is not always an election does not mean that there is no democracy, just that the ratepayers are happy with the present representation. 504 D Byrnes I am writing to express my concern about the forthcoming proposed changes to the electing of ward councillors. I feel strongly that the wards

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 42 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) need to be represented by a person that lives in that area, firstly because they live in the area and have personal contact with the ratepayers of their wards. Secondly because these areas are different than urban areas they are more remote so have different needs. I found before we became residents that they are unique, very strong support in our country area knowing what was needed if there was a need for help. I certainly support that the present system of electing councillors (local) be continued. 505 45 Pleasant (summarised) Point Strongly and unanimously support the current Community ward system for electing members of the TDC for Board the following reasons: • For an effective Council operation we need a good cross section of the District and under the current ward system this is the only way we are guaranteed both urban and rural representation • The current ward system has worked well for 23 years to provide a fair and balanced structure of democracy 506 M Squire The ward retains geographical representation. 507 C Komene To keep local government local. 508 R Talbot Because it would work better!! 509 M Ellery The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. 510 M Stowell Ensures voice for small communities and a democratic vote. 511 G Campbell Rural areas like Temuka, Geraldine and Pleasant Point need representation that is local to voice local opinion. Larger councils in the past have suited themselves and we do not want to fall into this situation again. 512 D Hunter Local voice. Someone who actually drives around Temuka everyday and can see what needs to be done, not someone who flys in for a visit once in a while. 513 J Campbell Rural representation. 514 T Hines The ward structure is fair, balanced and simple system. 515 S The current ward structure provides effective Brosnahan representation of communities of interest. 516 J Holden Bring back Pat and Dick 2013! 517 R Burgess Keep Temuka represented by a local person. 518 M Beer Local people to represent us at council 519 B Arvidson The current ward structure provides effective representation of community interests.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 43 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 520 J Cox The current ward structure provides effective representation of community interests. 521 J Shore The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system. 522 N Doake To keep local government local. 523 C Scarsbrook I want local people representing local issues from my own town. I think the ward system is a much fairer system. 524 K West The ward system works well so there is no need for change. 525 P Kirton An intelligent, experienced local is more beneficial than a stranger. 526 M Jackson The ward structure is fair, balanced and simple. 527 C Jackson 1. Temuka, Geraldine and Pleasant Point and the surrounding districts were given a representation when they came together as one. The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 2. The ward system, very well, looks after all people in their respective towns and districts. 3. Keep a local voice in the local government. 528 D Maloney The ward system works really well so there is no need for change. To keep a local voice in local government. 529 C Teahen That almost one third of voters live outside Timaru city and by maintaining current ward structure ensures that all areas have a councillor who will speak on their behalf on matters that affect them personally as well as areas in general.

530 I Moloney To keep a local voice in local government. The ward system works really well so there is no need for change. 531 M Hogg Current system has better country representation! More equal division of power. 532 C Bloor Fairer representation for all of South Canterbury. Not just Timaru. 533 N Nimo It ensures the rural areas get a voice on the council which is a fairer representation of the population. Works well as it is in my opinion so no need for change. 534 N Dobbs The ward system works so no need to change. 535 R Murch The ward system reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. 536 M Kirton I support local not centralised government. 537 S Bradford The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 538 J West The ward structure is a fair and simple system. 539 G Swann The present structure is democratic. Democracy

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 44 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) is a must. Country people will not act like a gang but town people may act in a gang way, so therefore, we must have a representative from each area as those people can confer with the person who they wanted to be represented by. 540 R Gomond The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 541 L&L The ward system was put in place in 1989 or McMillan thereabouts to protect a guaranteed vote for rural (Temuka) when the Temuka Borough Council was abolished. The ward system ensures a balanced, fair and simple system that also ensures a balanced urban/rural representation as well as geographical. The ward system keeps a local voice in local government and is working well. “Why fix if it not broken”. The ward system keeps all parties honest and hopefully reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. We are 3 rd and 5 th generation Temuka/Arowhenua residents. 542 M Rourke The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 543 G Dobbs To keep a local voice in local government. 544 P Brown The TDC was established in 1989 with the clear mandate that each community of interest would be represented on the Council. The principal reason for this was to provide effective representation for each substantial area or “ward” (i.e. Geraldine, Temuka, Pleasant Point and Timaru) and as such the ward system or structure was adopted. The system has worked well over the years with each area having equal representation in relation to population. The system: 1. Is fair to all areas and is simple to implement 2. Allows each ward (rural) to easily identify with its elected representative 3. Guarantees a vote for each of the wards giving a balance of rural/urban interests. There is an old saying which seems very appropriate “If it ain’t broke don’t fix it”. Accordingly I wish to record my support for the current system. 545 M Brown Each community required and needs a support person from their own area to communicate our individual needs to the South Canterbury Council. A person who you can approach daily to air your concerns when the need arises; that knows the area well, the people well and will listen and offer advice to your individual concerns. My support is

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 45 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) to keep a local voice in local government. 546 46 P Maslin (summarised) • Promised continued and fair representation by the local bodies commissioner at amalgamation. • Existing system operating effectively • Unimpressed with at large vote by Councillors • Agendas need to be local agendas, not national • Ward system allows for open, fair and local representation • Advocate amalgamation with Geraldine if does not happen 547 N Hatton Upon amalgamation I think we were promised some representation on Council for Temuka. 548 D Lawson Information from all localities is important! 549 B Fennessy • Local representation is more personal. • There is a greater opportunity to have local issues identified when there is geographic representation. • Small centres and rural areas are thin in population – base and they need to have their needs defended. • With amalgamation in the mid 1980s local representation was promised. 550 G Kearns The current ward system provides effective representation of communities of interest. The three small townships and districts need representation. The open vote system does not provide for this opportunity. I want our own representative who lives in Temuka and understands local issues. If we lose our representative we may never get another – He is the voice of Temuka on the TDC. 551 D Bennett The ward system retains geographical representation enabling us to keep a voice in local government. 552 J Holland The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table. The ward system ensures a balanced rural/urban representation. The ward system reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. The three smaller townships and surrounding districts need representation, the open voting system does not necessarily provide for that opportunity. 553 J Kearns The 3 smaller townships and surrounding districts need representation. The ward system works well so there is no need for change. I do give Pat

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 46 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) Mulvey my vote to stay on. 554 J Bennett To keep a local voice in local government. To keep smaller towns with a representative. The ward system works well why change it. 555 48 D Binney (summarised) Support ward proposal, for following reasons: 1. Diversity of district in landforms, landuse, infrastructure and service needs. Essential for mix of councillors that serve rural/urban independence. 2. Possible at large system would mean all Councillors would come from Timaru urban area 3. Electors would lack sufficient information on candidates through at large system 4. Electioneering in at large case would have potential consequences Would also like the Timaru Ward to be divided into three wards, with two members each. 556 M&J Knight I agree with the representation review. I feel it is very important that one councillor be elected from Geraldine to represent its residents on the council so our views can be presented and supported to some extent. I am sure the other small communities of Pleasant Point and Temuka feel the same. I felt that this represented would have been lost if councillors had been elected at large. 557 S Nichelsen Geraldine needs representation with the ward system we will get this even though it will only be a small representation. If councillors were to be elected at large no Geraldine councillor would ever be elected and we would have no representation at all. If 100% of the Geraldine voters had voted for Michael Oliver at the last election he would not have been elected under at “at large” voting system. It is bad enough that we in Geraldine have to pay for all the things in Timaru such as the new swimming pool etc. that we can use only rarely because of the distance and cost of travel. Under an ‘at large’ scheme we would have no say where our rates were spent. It would be taxation without fair representation. We must keep the ward system. 558 H I believe that the ward system is better than the McFarlane ‘at large’ proposal. It is a tough balancing act but I do feel that the three rural ward representatives is a bare minimum. Slightly more than a token gesture but a gesture none the less. 559* A Watts I am in favour of having 9 councillors elected through 3 wards. When the TDC was formed we

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 47 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) were assured that Geraldine and Temuka would be represented by local councillors. As far as I can see the system has worked well and I can see no good reason for changing that. I have no problem with there being one less councillor. 560 L Robertson 1. Communities of interest are well established in the TDC area. They are: Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point. All three of these towns have their own specific circumstances. I am supporting the retention of the Geraldine ward as this community has; Schools, banks, shops, supermarket, pre schools, churches and a High School. 2. Effective representation means someone from our district being on the council. They will know our area or the people whom they represent. 3. I want fair representation where we have a say and not just Timaru people making decisions for us. It does not matter how hard these people would try they would still not know what is best for the Geraldine area. 561 C West It’s important that our smaller rural towns retain individual representation. I therefore support retaining the ward system. 562 A Starky I support the draft proposal which allows for ward based councillors to continue to be elected in the rural districts of the Timaru district separately from the Timaru city ward. I believe that having ward based councillors elected in this way honours the aspirations of the communities that joined with Timaru to form the TDC. It also ensures that there is a fair representation of people from around the district. 563 A Prentice I support the election of nine Councillors through the current ward structure. I originally supported the ‘at large’ option but I have changed my mind after listening to much discussion on the issue. I think that the rural area would suffer by not having their chosen candidates on Council. The ward system has worked well to date and 9 councillors, plus the Mayor, can surely work effectively together. It would be less change for the community and it is of the utmost importance that we have a balanced urban/rural representation. 564 A Winter I support the current proposal of electing 9 councillors, 6 from Timaru, 2 from Pleasant Point and 1 from Geraldine. Although I understand the "at-large" option of allowing ALL voters to vote for ALL councillors, I

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 48 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) believe the "at-large" option would make it difficult for rural ward people to stand for council because they would be less known in the larger area of Timaru for all their good work in their local community. The Geraldine community, for example, knows their community leaders well, and therefore can make a knowledgeable vote whereas voters in the Timaru ward may be unaware of the positive contributions occurring in Geraldine. The argument that 9 councillors would give the mayor a casting vote, I find irrelevant. I believe that if a community has voted in the mayor, then we should trust our mayor to make an informed decision if a casting vote was needed. I also disagree with the point raised previously that rural wards often lack competition when it comes to nominations for a councillor. I believe that if a community is happy with the representation they have received previously from a councillor, then they may decide to let that councillor go unopposed at the following election. Why try and change a good thing? As has been shown recently in Geraldine, when a true space opens on council, 4 high quality candidates have stepped forward. 565 D Craigie The ratepayers in the Geraldine area need a voice at the TDC to ensure they are getting value for money with funding being spent in our local area on our amenities. If there is no voice for the rural communities the Timaru councillors will pour more money into Timaru and forget about us. The new CBay is an example. Geraldine had to do a lot of self fundraising to get it’s swimming pool which now the TDC seem to have trouble maintaining for us. Our rural roads are being graded less frequently and the maintenance level has dropped due to cuts in rural funding. If we are paying our rates we should be getting the services we need in return. 566 J Holwell For the reasons below, I endorse the decision made by the Council that the local body elections be held under the ward system. To be fair to all ratepayers it is necessary to have representation from both urban and rural areas and this would be difficult to achieve with the ’at large’ system. Councillors would be placed in a difficult situation trying to represent both urban and rural interests. The money saved by having one less councillor could be used for purposes benefitting the whole

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 49 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) district. From a workload point of view, the present councillors have time to debate the order of names on a ballot paper one less councillor would not make too much difference. It would be far more costly for individual candidates while campaigning if they had to cover the whole district and would possibly be a barrier for some potential candidates. As well ratepayers would probably see less of each candidate in their own area because of the size of the area. The community boards should be more equal in number – i.e. 6 members in each area. Thank you for the opportunity to present my views. 567 50 D Aubrey (summarised) Support the representation review proposal as detailed in the submission being made by the Geraldine Community board. Preferred option chosen by Council for consultation is the correct one. Retention of a ward based system most likely ensures that rural wards achieve local representatives. Greater likelihood that Council then received knowledgeable representation. Local knowledge helps when representing ratepayers who may have important concerns specifically pertinent to their location. This view is view of clear majority of Geraldine ward ratepayers. At large system is likely to deliver Timaru based candidates. 568 G My submission is to please keep wards as they Williamson are. 569 G Patrick Please stay with the status quo (do not change). 570 W Patrick Do not change the present system. 571 J O’Brien As a Geraldine ratepayer, I strongly support the election of a local ward representative to the TDC for the following reasons: 1. The Council area is very spread out and Geraldine issues need to have the expertise of someone who lives in the area to bring them before Council. 2. Geraldine is at least 30 minute drive away from Timaru and much of the area is even further away. 3. Local issues can be taken directly to the local representative while access to a representative living out of the area would require a toll call every time. 4. Each of the wards has a very different character and local representation would best reflect that.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 50 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 5. The current system works well and should be retained as it ensures fair representation over the whole area. 572 W Pollson I believe it is important for a councillor to be elected to represent the people of the Geraldine district. The Geraldine ward is a unique and key part of the Timaru district needs to be represented by someone who has a clear understanding of the people and businesses that make up our ward. We are primarily a rural community so the councillor needs an understanding of this aspect as well. Electing 10 councillors (too many in my opinion) at large runs the risk of the TDC becoming even more Timaru-centric and the surrounding rural centres becoming marginalised. 573 J Boys This submission is to record strong support for the proposal as it now stands. 574 N Clarke When Temuka, Pleasant Point and Geraldine amalgamated with Timaru we were to retain representation within the respective wards from our local councillors and not Timaru ward councillors representing us. Local members have a greater understanding of local issues. Nearly impossible for rural people to be elected on to Council if the vote was ‘at large’ due to rural population versus urban. We would be severely disadvantaged. Temuka ward is a geographically identifiable community of interest best served by separate representation. Since amalgamation we have been well represented by our local ward councillors so why change now. 575 Aoraki Aoraki Development Business and Tourism Developme supports the draft representation proposal. We nt Business believe this ensures balanced representation & Tourism between town and country, recognising that our district is heavily dependent upon the rural sector for economic prosperity. 576 G Holwell I wish to record my support for the initial proposal as publicly notified on 8/9/12 for a Council of 9 members elected from 3 wards and the mayor elected at large. In doing so I commend the TDC for making that decision for the reasons they did. Given the make up of the Timaru district and the variety that exists within the various communities incorporated therein, I consider it most important that there be representatives elected from wards, as has been since the establishment of the Timaru district, thereby protecting the opportunity for the interests of electors in all parts of the District to continue. I do not consider that electing

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 51 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) representatives at large would give the same certainty for electors in rural and small urban communities. I also support the election of community boards as proposed. 577 P Radcliffe I support the ward system and believe that a TDC councillor living locally (i.e. Geraldine) can better advocate for this community and its individual members than can a councillor based in Timaru who may know neither the community nor its member. The late Michael Oliver, our Ward councillor, was always readily accessible in my own experience and I was the recipient of his help and advice on more than one occasion; not having to travel into Timaru but instead the convenience of being able to meet fact to face in an informal setting. A committed community man, he knew its members well and as relief rural mail delivery driver, availed himself of the opportunity to better know rural residents too. We need someone like Michael. We need a ward councillor. 579 H George I am of the opinion that the three ward representation should be kept and the community boards should stay the same as before. It is important that districts have a councillor to represent them at Council meetings. As without this districts like Temuka/Pleasant Point and Geraldine could be overlooked if only councillors from Timaru are elected. I strongly oppose any changes to the representation from what is in at the present time. 581 D Scott Geraldine is a unique town that services a wider community most of which is rural. Over the years its main focus was on providing services to meet the needs of the rural community but in recent years Geraldine’s identity has become more divergent and as a result and as a result has a special culture and flavour all of it’s own. It is this ‘specialness’ that Geraldine prides itself on and wishes to retain. The people that represent our flourishing community have an affinity towards helping Geraldine keep on growing and meeting the constantly changing needs of those that live here. The current ward system means that Geraldine can maintain it’s uniqueness by having a voice that otherwise would not be heard. 583 D Wreford No taxation without representation. I support the current ward system as it guarantees that all sections of the district are represented. An ‘at large’ system could be hijacked by a determined

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 52 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) group (e.g. the Greens), to the detriment of rural and business ratepayers. 584 N Barton Representation of the rural areas is best achieved under the ward system. 585 M Caldwell My personal view is that it is important for the rural voice to be heard. Having been raised in a small town (Temuka) and now living in Timaru, large town representatives may have the ‘best intentions’, however they are not able to fully understand or articulate the voice of the rural people and outlying areas. Living in the town or community and voicing ones opinion is critical to a democratic process. I’m in support of the proposal. 586 C Fisher Council needs to represent all members of our district by having ‘rural’ councillors our wide spread area is served more fairly. 587 M&J Burridge We would like to register our submission for the retention of the ward system for the local government election process. This system works well for the Geraldine and surrounding districts, meaning we would at least have a voice if this style was retained. 589 G Ward First comment – it is not clear here what the representation review proposal is…. I have assumed that by selecting “Support” I am supporting the retention of the present ‘ward structure”…perhaps this could have been made more clear. While South Canterbury is dominated, i.e. population base, by the urban area of Timaru, much of what makes up South Canterbury is actually rural based (especially when one views the economic ‘engine room’ of the community). Therefore, I think the current ward system provides an appropriate balance to the urban v rural representation as to how our community is governed. In time I would hope the rural voters will be more comfortable with ‘elections at large’….at this point the vote for change would not be driven by population base but by a recognition that we are one community. When this occurs then the change will be accepted. 590 G Gibson Present system works, gives outer lying areas voice in council decisions. Those areas affected do form the greater South Canterbury region. 591 A White Would like to see the existing ward system stay so that country areas get a fair representation on the council. Definitely am opposed to the council being elected including the whole district as one. 592 G Barker The whole community will be served better by

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 53 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) having the system that already supports them. They get to know their local voice and this makes the governance process less complicated, you get to know the councillor and can approach them directly. Local people for local representation. 593 M Healy I wish to communicate to you that I support the ward system for 6 councillors in the Timaru ward, 2 in Temuka and Pleasant Point and one in Geraldine. It is important that the views of the general public have on issues be relayed through representative from that area. The people are contributing to the district and surely can expect respect for options best relayed through representatives from among them. 594 P Jost The proposed representation has served the district well. One less councillor in Timaru evens out the population spread. We do not need a system designed for political gain and disadvantaging those in arrears other than in the Timaru ward. A similar voting system in the health board elections has disadvantaged those in the outlying areas of the district. 597 R Dockrill While I reside in Timaru I understand that the rural people feel they should be represented by people from their own area and I support them with this. 598 O Odey I support the proposal. Pleasant Point, Temuka and Geraldine are very important communities of interest to our district and they need their own representation. 599 54 J McIntosh (summarised) Support the initial proposal (current ward system). Geraldine community is an entity in its own right – within the Timaru district! My 20 years in the local community have clarified this many times. Supported in local community. Every trip to the local shops yields smiles and familiar faces – staff and customers alike. This is precious to us all and helps to maintain our sense of community. A wealth of organizations provide companionship, challenges and a chance to help others. Need and want to retain a Councillor who has Geraldine’s interests and concerns clear in their minds. 600 55 A France (summarised) Support of the initial proposal “that the present ward system of representation be retained, less one Timaru ward councillor.” Please consider the following: 1. If a new South Canterbury Authority was

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 54 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) formed, would the council consider it appropriate for the Mackenzie and Waimate areas to have a ward system of representation? 2. If it was legislated that Canterbury became a greater local authority or unitary authority including the cities of Christchurch and Timaru, would the Timaru District councillors seek a ward system for such a scenario? Support the ward system as we believe it has a distinct and proper place in our democratic society and protects the smaller communities from remote decision making. We also believe that reducing one council representative from the Timaru ward has the least impact on the area as a whole in order to correct the imbalance of representatives. 601 F Ross I would like the present ward representation system retained as it ensured voters in the rural areas have certainty with a voice on Council. Rural residents contribute significantly towards the health and welfare of the overall Timaru district and that contribution needs to be recognised by adequate representation on the Council. 602 T McKean The rural communities need to have their own councillor who knows what their community needs are. 603 L Johnson The communities of interest need their own councillor. It needs to be someone who is from that area and knows the community not some ‘BIG WIG’ from out of town who knows nothing about the area. It needs to be someone who is willing to support and be in the community to know the goings on and not somebody who can come and go as they have no idea on the needs of the community and what is going on. 605 R Teahen I support the representation review proposal. The ward system assures the Temuka area of representation and a vote on the TDC. A councillor elected by the ward is likely to have good networks within the ward and greater knowledge of issues that affect the ward. I give no credence to one councillor's (in favour of at large option) assertion that councillors from the rural wards have less ability. Also that there has not been elections in some wards does not mean a lack of candidates but rather complete confidence in the candidate standing. You only have to see the reaction to the first vote for the at

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 55 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) large option to see that voters in the wards will take action if they are not happy. The at large option will see city voters dominate polling and rural areas without representation unless voters vote strategically, why should you have to do this. The at large option makes it easier for political parties to infiltrate local councils and drive their narrow agendas. We do not want the dysfunctional relationships in our council that appear in some councils around the country. 606 M Teahan I wish to retain the ward system so that local representatives will have a greater interest and knowledge of the needs in the area and there is easier and more personal approachability. There is also a greater chance of politics being introduced if the at large option is adopted. 608 59 D Ross (summarised) Geraldine district is an area best represented by the current ward structure and wish to see no change in this, as its paramount to the wellbeing of the community of Geraldine. Geraldine has a wonderful and genuine sense of identity. It is my community of interest. Geraldine provides nearly all my requirements. Geographically remote from Timaru and would have difficulty getting a fair representation if a ward system did not exist. In favour of ward system for Geraldine district. 609 G&J Gee We support the ward system because Geraldine is represented by a local councillor who knows the district. Also we have our own big supermarket, 4 doctors, chemist, other shops, recreational facilities including a heated swimming pool, churches, banks & clubs. 610 R Frahm I fully support the initial proposal the current ward system for the reasons below: • Geraldine’s location - I use a wide range of Geraldine facilities (i.e. Pool, school, banks, shops, library and service centre etc.) • My sense of identity and belonging • Reasonable representation • Community relationship with councillor • The size of the district and variance in common interests Access to councillor • Ability for councillor to attend public meetings • No need for change • Most balanced fair system • Ensures balance of urban and rural representation.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 56 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) I feel very strongly that we require our own ward councillors to get fair and effective representation. As it is a legal requirement to provide ‘effective representation of communities of interest and fair representation of electors’ and that ‘wards are likely to be appropriate in circumstances where a territorial authority district contains a number of distinct, geographically identifiable communities of interest best served by separate representation’, I would be very upset if the decision was not to retain ward councillors. 614 G Harper I am writing in to let you know that I support the ward system. The reasons being: • Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point are well defined communities within the Timaru district. They all well serviced with school, doctors, lawyers, accountants, rural service business, supermarkets, retail, etc. • Geraldine and its surrounding villages are half an hour plus travel from Timaru. • 15,000 odd population in these rural communities represents approx 1/3 of the total Timaru District and it is very important that there are 3 individual councillors representing all these individual communities and all the special issues and needs that arise. • Having a local Geraldine councillor (e.g. will make TDC decision making a lot more robust). • These rural communities are very important to the over success of the Timaru district as the rural sector is a major provider in many ways to the Timaru city itself, so again very important for all stakeholder to have councillors representing these 3 main communities. 615 W&L Hayman It is the fairest system to ensure that all the areas in the TDC have a voice at the Council table. Country towns and rural areas have some different problems than in the city and they need to be heard. 616 T Broughton Please continue with the ward system to elect council members. The ward election system allows the one small chance people have to elect a person or persons to represent the area, town or city under the district council’s jurisdiction. Denied this opportunity the ratepayer will quickly lost interest in the affairs of his/her community and its wellbeing. Local authority means just that, local elected representatives to represent the views and the best interest of the local area.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 57 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 617 V Lewis (no comments) 618 B Ronald I want to see the ward system retained. It works fine as it is and doesn’t need to be changed for the sake of change and the political agenda of some councillors. This is the only system that guarantees representation of the rural communities. The small towns (Temuka, Pleasant Point, etc.) will not and cannot be represented by a Timaru based councillor. 619 J Harmon Very happy with status quo. Don’t fix what’s not broken. 620 J Orr (no comments) 621 J Rule If we continue with the current voting system we are at least afforded some representation and fairness. Why should we have to vote for someone who probably wouldn’t give us the true representation we deserve. I believe a lot of rating money comes out of the Geraldine ward. If you change from what is reasonably fair to some other form of electing committees you do so at your peril. I can’t see why we couldn’t have one elected councillor and the Chairman of the community board be given speaking rights at council meetings. “We are our own town, we should have council representation by someone who lives and understands the community needs.” 622 H Holmes Your initial proposal to do away with the ward system I supported because it would expedite the divorce of the old Geraldine County and Geraldine Borough from the TDC. Your most recent draft proposal I half heartedly support because although it ensures continued Geraldine representation at the Timaru council table, it slows down the divorce process mentioned above. In an ideal world a stand alone Geraldine District Council combining the former Geraldine County and Geraldine Borough Council would be our local body. Then we would have meaningful local representation by people familiar with our area. 623 W Bedford (no comments) 624 M Sewell I believe it is really important to retain the current ward system as it gives a fair representation to the community of Geraldine. 625 A&H 1. Our right as ratepayers to have guaranteed Morgan rural based councillors 2. Ward system works satisfactorily so why change it? 3. Retaining geographical representation is

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 58 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) essential. 4. Timaru only based councillors not always aware of or heedful of rural needs, interests and communities. 5. Decisions made by Timaru councillors only, not always in interests of wider rural areas. 626 62 D Payne (summarised) Support retention of ward system. Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point are three distinct communities of interest. Vital that their interests represented at the TDC. Ensures community/rural representation which would be lost with an at large system, with interests of rural communities overwhelmed by self interest of Timaru voters. Likely to have better understanding of issues of Geraldine. Prosperity of regions drive prosperity of city.

Opposed to at large voting. Voting dominance of Timaru would lead to few Councillors elected from rural wards. Suspicious of push for at large voting system. Also oppose any move towards a few Councillors elected at large. 627 P&J Moynihan We, Peter and Jenny Moynihan, are right at the back of the Timaru district. Our distance from Timaru city leaves us somewhat marginalised and disconnected from the urban area. Priorities in town seem to be dodgy entertainment complexes that will continually lose money while our is roading and bridges and having affordable rates that won’t cripple our business. We consider it an absolute necessity that rural wards are maintained to give country people a fair say. Having a local person, we can easily talk to about our concerns has always been a valuable asset and Richard Lyon has represented us well. The proposal to elect 10 councillors at large was an evil attempt to disenfranchise the rural ratepayers. There is no room for party politics in local government. 628 65 Geraldine (summarised) Community Submit its unanimous support for the Council’s Board initial proposal ‘that the Council comprise 9 members elected from 3 wards and the mayor elected at large’. Geraldine community is very clearly a distinct community of interest within the Timaru district. Both rural and urban residents use Geraldine as their service town on a daily basis. They bank, shop, buy their groceries and educate their children in the town. Many of them will retire

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 59 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) to Geraldine and eventually live in one of the 3 rest homes in Geraldine. Our people deserve a local councillor who lives amongst us and who understands our community and its requirements. Geraldine is isolated from the rest of the Timaru district not only physically but also by having a separate telephone, toll free calling area. Retaining the ward structure ensures that the rural communities within the Timaru district have guaranteed representation around the council table. Most important that our rural community has a voice and a vote in the allocation of rates and the development of plans for the district. The Geraldine community board also wishes to submit in favour of the council’s proposal for community boards, because: 1. It provides an equal total number of members on each community board 2. It is the structure which was favoured by all 3 of the existing community boards. 629 C Gibson As most of the wealth of the TDC area comes from the rural area it is absolutely imperative to have a rural voice. I support the ward system. 630 M Gibson I would like to see it continue on the basis that it provides guaranteed rural representation. 631 W Divan 40% of rates come from the country so I wish to very strongly support the retention of the ward system of Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point. 632 E Small I wish to record my wish to remain with the ward system for electing councillors. 633 W Small I wish to record my wish to remain with the ward system for electing councillors. 634 66 G Broker (summarised) Imperative to retain system, because: • Virtually impossible for prospective Councillors to become well known enough if they did not reside in or close to former City area under at large system • Work done by TDC to assist effective operation of Council by breaking down city/urban factions would be undone. • Likely 14,000 rural population would have no representation • If super Canterbury Council formed, unlikely current Timaru District would be represented Disagree with statements that Mayor influenced Advisory Panel against an at large election. Statements that at large election is working in other areas is misleading. Urge Council to confirm draft proposal.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 60 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 635 J Matheson The present ward system has worked well for many years, keeps local voice in local government and guarantees it to continue. Provides rural representation in a simple, fair and balanced system. Local government is truly local government. 636 SC We have thirteen women’s institutes in South Executive Canterbury and although some members now live Women’s in Timaru we feel it is important that the country Institute residents have a representative on Council whom they can approach. 637 R Holland The ward system works well so ‘why change something that isn’t broken’. I feel country people and residents of the country towns should have the opportunity to elect representatives that understand the issues of rural life which can be different to city living. 638 D Paine I wish the retention of the ward system as it has been successful for many years (if it ain’t broke don’t fix it). 641 L Brokenshire Please! No more big projects to boost our rates higher. We have no transport at reasonable times or cost so city amenities are no advantage to our elderly Temuka residents. With only one voice, hopefully for us, we feel very ‘used’. This is the feeling gendered from the many groups I attend. 642 E Hind The ward system is the only sure way that Geraldine will have a representation on the Council. It is only a very small one but is better than none. If the ‘at large’ option is used it is very unlikely that, even if every voter in the Geraldine area voted for the same candidate, that candidate would be elected because the 4-5000 votes would not exceed the number of votes that Timaru candidates would receive. A candidate who does not live in the Geraldine area could not be expected to understand the ethos of the area of the attitudes within it. Neither could the Geraldine residents conveniently build and maintain a working relationship with the candidate of councillor. It seems to me that the present ward system is working quite well so why change it! 643 71 B Leadley (summarised) Support the draft proposal as amended on September 4. Election of all councillors ‘at large’ would be detrimental to the gaining balanced representation. The success of Team Timaru at the last election indicates what can be done when a determined group campaigns ‘en bloc’. ‘At large’ election could be dominated by a block of Timaru

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 61 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) based candidates gaining enough votes to deny rural representation. The council table requires the special values, skills and perspective which are brought by councillors from the rural wards be they farmers or small town residents. Some of our best councillors have come from these communities. Association with the former Timaru High School Board, with members appointed by County Councils brought a special character to the board table. It is that character that I was to see retained around the TDC table. 644 L&V de We support the above described proposal Garnham because Geraldine is a Rural community. We would like a local voice for our local community concerns and suggestions. This may not always be the case with the ‘Councillors at Large’ option. Also a body of ‘Candidates at Large’ may not be well known to rural locals and therefore the best people for a smaller community may not be elected. 645 73 ME (summarised) Seymour My father, the late AM Mahan was a long standing and last Mt Peel member of the Geraldine CC. He strongly resisted amalgamations (Temuka, Levels onto Strathallan) saying that once it started that it would never stop. Mackenzie and Waimate proved that they could stand alone and so could have Geraldine. The amalgamations did not stop, the wards whittled down, and now trying to be deleted. No, no! The ward areas are so large and diverse that members must be kept and come from within that ward not from within the community boards. I very much support the retention of wards, preferable also Temuka and Pleasant Point split to fit in with their local community board areas. 646 H Bedford- I support keeping the ward system. As an elderly Harris person it is far easier and comfortable to be able to speak to a person who can understand my interest. 647 L Nelson I fully support the current ward system, giving Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point a voice in local council. It would be a disgrace if the council voted to do away with this system and adopt the ‘at large’ system. We were promised that we would always have a voice when we joined with Timaru council. They should keep their word! 648 J Bain The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. The ward

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 62 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) system works well so there is no need for change. The ward system ensures a balanced urban rural representation. 649 F Mulvey I am sure all the past councillors of the Temuka / Geraldine Borough Councils and Strathallan County Council when voting for amalgamation did not envisage that there would be any suggestion the ward system be abolished. The system they put in place is working so no need for a change. If the council wants to have a united district they need to keep the local representation ward system especially when having to pay for big projects like Caroline Bay upgrade and Aquatic centre. 650 F Stewart It is important to retain the current ward structure as it guarantees balanced voting at the Council table for rural committees. 651 75 J Young (summarised) Support ward system, as: 1. Protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table – as promised when the Geraldine Borough and County was amalgamated into Timaru district. 2. The current ward structure provides effective representation of communities of interest. 3. The ward system is fair, balanced and simple. 4. If representation is per head of population, then the number of rural representatives will increase as population is increasing now. 5. Ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. 6. Retains geographical representation 7. Do not lack choice because Councillor unopposed. Just indicates community satisfaction 8. Reduces likelihood of party politics 9. Work well, so no need for change 10. Geraldine is a community of interest 11. Need a voice in local government 652 M Smith As a rural Timaru District ratepayer living in the Levels Plain, we feel it is a necessity to retain the ward system. Who better to represent and be a spokesperson for these rural areas: Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant; than an elected councillor who resides in and understands the area and issues affecting its ratepayers. An outsider – urban dwelling councillor is insular to the issues that effect rural districts. Surely this is a democratic module giving all ratepayers the same advantages. Voting at

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 63 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) large would be a backward step for the TDC. 653 M Dyer We must have a locally elected person living in Douglas the area so that the people retain some control of Mark Ltd what happens in our area. 654 D Dyer Representation of the 9 councillors through the Douglas ward structure should remain the same. Who Mark Ltd better than the people that live in an area to decide on issues that affect them; I would like a say in local matters. Who better than the people that live in the area to decide on issues that affect them. Often Town v Country have very differing views on how to achieve the same outcomes. One size or directive doesn’t necessarily fit all. I would like a say in local matters. 655 D Keene Rates focused on Timaru and amenities for Timaru not necessarily to the benefit of all the district. If 9/10 councillors elected from ‘at large’ the larger district will have an overwhelming majority of councillors. 565 I Brady (no comments) 657 Temuka Support the initial proposal; that being the ward Branch of system with 3 ward councillors and 6 Timaru Federated councillors. Farmers - AW Millar 658 N Mangum I believe to represent an area effectively one needs to live in that area to understand the issues and concerns of topic. 659 J Clemens We need to maintain representation which speaks for 100% of the district’s rate payers. 660 N Gould Being such a large area, we should have a spread of councillors throughout the district and the above proposal is the most effective method to achieve this. 661 A Paul The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. 662 J McDonald Ward system is well balanced and reflects district wide voice, fair and balanced. 663 S Anglem The ward system retains geographical representation. The ward system ensures a balanced urban rural representation. 664 N Russell I feel the rural sector is a big part of the economy and as that stands we need to be heard, hence the need for the ward system. If we lose this we lose the back bone of the country. 665 P Scannell The ward system works well. No need to change. Need to protect the rural people. 666 A Lyon Leave it the way it is. 667 D Johnson Why fix something that’s not broken, i.e. if it ain’t

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 64 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) broke don’t fix it. 668 D Reardon The current ward system works well now and so I do not see any need for change. The present system provides a balance between rural-urban input. 669 J Healy The ward system as it stands insures a well balanced between urban and our dearly beloved rural representation. 670 R Esler It is most important that the rural areas have their own elected councillor. This way we would be guaranteed rural based councillors and that we would have someone we can go to who understands the local area. Quite often there is no need for an election in the rural wards but it is not because of lack of interest but because we are satisfied with the person nominated. If not we would be nominating another candidate. The ward system is the fairest, most balanced and simplest way for electing the councillors in the region and keeps the geographical representation. I strongly urge the election of nine councillors through the current ward structure. 671 N Bartrum The country areas need representation of people with knowledge of the needs of the country area. This could easily be lost with the voting power of the Timaru city. The council needs to be truly representative of the entire area. 672 M Marshall We live here in ‘Point” not in Timaru and as such are a different community to Timaru city. We have to pay Timaru city rates (as a ratepayer) and for our area to have no say at the council table is totally unacceptable. Remembering too the strongest opposition to the current ward system comes from those who stood as ‘Team Timaru” at the last election – not Team Timaru District. It is imperative that our community has a voice on the council. 673 S Scannell Reduces party politics. It has always proved a fair rural urban representation. We need a local voice in local government. Our area is well represented. 674 G Gardiner I believe local people are better able to represent on local issues. You need someone who is ‘in tune’ with the rural population. Someone who is trusted and respected by the locals. I think we should keep the existing ward system. 675 D Diamond Local problems need local solutions. The people affected are the ones to fix the problems as they know the history of the area and the cause and effect. City councillors come in a bus, view the problem and propose the wrong solution because

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 65 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) of lack of local knowledge. Keep our existing ward structure. 676 L Thomas The system works as it is. 677 D Wilson The system is working as it is. 678 T Frame I wish to support the status quo. 679 C Rodgers I would like to have rural representation on the Council. The ward structure will do this. 680 J Bagust I want local representation from within my neighbourhood. 681 J Taylor I think it is essential to have someone who lives locally who totally understands the concerns and problems in the area and can bring them directly to the council. The present system has worked extremely well with pressing concerns being brought to the council and while there are people willing to put themselves forward to represent their rural area it should be left as it is. 682 M Turnbull That I do not think it is in the interest of small towns to change their representation or to reduce their representation on the Council. In other words, the status quo should be as it stands. Local representatives have a wider knowledge as residents in their respective towns than any outsiders and also a wider understanding of the issues which are involved. 683 G Lindsay Better local representation for Pleasant Point. Greater voice for our town. 684 B Paul Keeping the rural voice I feel is important so I’m definitely for the current ward structure. 685 R Hilton 1. The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the Council table and ensures a balanced urban-rural representation. 2. The ward system reduces the likelihood of party politics and cronyism becoming engrained in local government. 686 C Agnew We would like to maintain our local representation please. 687 L Pye The ward system ensures a balanced urban-rural representation. 688 J Esler 1. Retain geographical representation. 2. Retain communities of interest, ward systems seem fairest way to achieve this. 3. Ensures urban/rural representation. 4. Nothing wrong with a smaller council but should the community support otherwise, then particular community of interest considerations should justify a change from the +/-10% rule. 5. I totally support the retention of community

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 66 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) boards. Comment – I notice council established an advisory panel back in March with not one elected community board member on it. 689 L Esler We need to keep our geographical representation and retain our community of interest. Only the local person can truly represent us and know our area well. Community boards in local areas are a must and retaining them is essential if the country voice is to be heard. We do pay rates too. 690 A Mounsey Stay with the status quo. 691 W Brighouse- We definitely need to have a voice for Pleasant Sword Point. It seems crazy to consider changing the current system which works well. 692 M Sword Pleasant Point needs independent and local representation. The present system works, why change it? Just for changes sake!!!! Why fix something which isn’t broken. 693 T Support that the TDC comprises of 9 councillors Henderson elected through 3 wards. Geraldine ward 1 councillor, Pleasant Point – Temuka ward 2 councillors and Timaru ward 6 councillors. 694 A Flynn I understand the Representation Review issue and wish to submit my support for the Council’s initial proposal which is Elect nine (9) Councillors through the current ward structure. The reason for my support is: I firmly believe that it is essential to retain the present ward structure thus ensuring the rural voice on Council. At the time of amalgamation and the formation of the TDC, the rural ratepayers were promised that their voice at Council would be retained. Since that time both urban and rural representation has been reduced but the rural representation has been retained. I am concerned that should the current ward structure be replaced by ‘at large councillors’ the rural voice could be lost through being outvoted by block voting for urban candidate teams. The present community councils in Pleasant Point, Temuka and Geraldine are effective forums for these centres but they need the support of their local ward councillor to lobby for them at Council level. Token speaking rights by the Chairs of these community councils are no substitute for voting rights by ward councillors. While I acknowledge that it can mean that rural ratepayers can sometimes not get a vote due to candidates being returned unopposed, it can also mean that the rural ratepayers are satisfied with their councillors.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 67 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) Should this satisfaction cease, I am sure other candidates would stand in future elections. With a considerable contribution to rate income coming from the rural ratepayers, I feel it is essential that they continue to have some influence on this distribution. 695 R Flynn I understand the Representation Review issue and wish to submit my support for the Council’s initial proposal which is Elect nine (9) Councillors through the current ward structure. The reason for my support is: In my opinion there is a need to retain the ward system which provides councillors who have gained extensive local and historic knowledge of the rural areas. These rural areas – Geraldine, Pleasant Point and Temuka – have their own complex local issues which are unique to the rural areas and different from those of the Timaru city area. Without rural councillors, these areas will not have a voice in Council. To give speaking rights to community board chairpersons is useless as the granting of speaking rights is not the same as having a vote at the Council table. There are some present councillors who do not have the experience or local knowledge to make some of the decisions required of them, especially decisions concerning the rural areas. With a considerable contribution to rate income coming from rural areas, I feel that it is important for rural ratepayers to have a voice in the way this money is spent on our behalf. 696 A&H Ulrich We wish the ward system to be retained under the TDC. We support Richard Lyon’s proposal. Please listen to our rural community. 697 77 C Sutcliffe (summarised) Do not support at large, because: 1. Urban based councillors are not familiar with rural needs or expectations. 2. Urban based councillors are much more aligned to urban needs. 3. Rural based councillors elected by rural communities need to present their rural area needs to a full council strongly and have voting rights to achieve that need. 4. When Strathallan County combined to form TDC agreement was reached that the rural area’s would have rural based councillors with full voting and speaking rights. Disappointed two Councillors voted for at large elections. If ain’t broken, why fix it. Existing

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 68 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) system works well. 698 G Hilton 1. The ward structure is a fair, balanced and simple system which works perfectly well so therefore I see no reason to change. 2. The ward system reduces the risk of party politics affecting the interests of rural communities. 699 B Coll (no comments) 700 T Scannell With the current ratio of urban to rural voters, we do not want to lose our rural representation. The ward system works well and ensures that everyone across the district gets fair representation. We do not need party politics on our council and I am sure that by protecting the status quo we will entice the right candidates to stand for election and represent our wards. If we lose our vote and the ward system as at present, I fear the loss of rural services and the general decline of the rural infrastructure. 701 R Lister I believe that the communities interest is best served by the ward system. 702 K&G Hunter We support the current ward structure. It works well and ensures balanced rural/urban representation. 703 78 S Payne (summarised) Support retention of ward system for election of Councillors to TDC. Amalgamation to form TDC was required by central government. At that time people within the rural districts felt shafted and believed that their community assets had been misappropriated by Timaru. The appeasement for loss of their autonomy was the establishment of the rural wards, with elected councillors representing the interests of rural constituents. No further loss of our representation should be tolerated. Over time Councillors appear to have accepted new responsibilities to the overall district. However, responsibility to lobby for own ward is also desirable and respected. Amalgamation undertakings should be honoured. If something is not broken, why fix it. Geraldine a well-defined community with special character and way of doing things. Strong sense of identity and opinions should be valued. Ward representation the most cost effective option available. Local ward representatives are well-informed and accessible to their constituents and should be maintained. Timaru strongly reliant on rural

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 69 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) economy Please retain the ward system for the election of councillors to the TDC. Council requires input from rural sector and unlikely to occur with any other representation model but the ward system. Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point meet above criteria and residents interests best served by separate representation. 704 N Grundy I wish the Council to retain the ward system as it is very, very important that each district is represented on the main council and that community boards remain. 705 J Mahan A local person understands their ward and closer to meeting people at worrying sites, and for meetings at a cheaper cost than travelling. As the council area goes to top of Rangitata Gorge would councillors be prepared to travel for meetings, inspections, etc. if they resided around Timaru – also to the cost? It is quite different for town people to understand country problems especially with the very diversified farming practises and land structure. 706 L Parr I support the ward system in order that the Geraldine, Pleasant Point and Temuka words will have fair and equitable speaking and voting rights. Any loss of voting rights will lead to unfair representation and therefore be detrimental to these areas as a whole. I trust my submission will help lead to a favourable decision buy Council to retain the ward system re voting and speaking rights. 707 J Parr I support the ward system in order that Geraldine, Pleasant Point, Temuka wards will have fair and equitable speaking and voting rights. Any loss of voting rights will lead to unfair representation and therefore be detrimental to those areas as a whole. I trust my submission will help lead to a favourable decision by council to retain the ward system i.e. voting and speaking rights. 708 W Smith (no comments) 709 W Ritchie I support the present set up but I believe the Geraldine ward should have 2 and Timaru only 5, 65% of rates come from the Geraldine stand. Timaru could end up like the Canterbury Regional Council, especially if ‘Team Timaru’ get their way. They are dangerous, they have political agendas. The country area will be forgotten if the voting is at large. My shingle road gets very little grading and when it does it is ‘hit and miss’, it would be worse if Timaru had all the say, I get little value

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 70 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) now for my rates which have doubled in the last few years. I don’t usually complain but I am going to from now on. 710 A Currie I support the above draft proposal. 711 82 E&R Hart (summarised) Support the proposal to have representation based on the ward system with the mayor elected at large. Important to have councillors living in the areas they represent to fully appreciate the needs of the community. In times of natural disasters (floods, etc) it is important to have people who understand the requirements of the community. When the council is embarking on items of major expenditure such as the Aquatic Centre (which we support) it is important to have the views of ratepayers in the surrounding rural areas heard at the Council table. By doing this democracy will be seen to be working. We want fair representation for the country areas from the country areas. 712 84 E Warren (summarised). Keep it live, keep it local. Around the world and G.B. 1931. I have lived in NZ since 1958 and have valued living in several communities and getting to know the local representatives. 713 J Fitzgerald I think that having council members from three wards and the retention of community boards gives the residents a better form of representation. 714 L McLenaghan I support the initial proposal. Geraldine is a special community. There is a higher percentage of those over 65 years old - 25.6% (2006 census). Timaru has only 18.3% (2006 census). I believe the elderly will have fairer representation in retaining the ward system. The councillor representing Geraldine will have a better understanding of the needs of the elderly e.g. the need for safe footpaths and curbing of street entrances for walking on and using mobility scooters to get to shops. 715 G My statement is as follows: Pemberton 1. I am a ratepayer in the Geraldine ward of the TDC. 2. I have lived in the Geraldine district all my life. 3. I have always valued the fact that I have had direct representation with my local representative and the local district council. 4. The Geraldine district is and will continue to be one of the main economic engine rooms of the wider Timaru district. 5. Water, the abundance of in the Geraldine

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 71 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) district will enhance the growth and set apart its economic impact as opposed to other regions of the Timaru district, especially with water harvesting in the region, now happening and under development. 6. In my view to consider that the region does not have direct representation with it Council is inconceivable. 7. Because of the economic impact that our ward has, we should be looking for more direct representation, not less. 717 A Hurley Historically Geraldine and the surrounding rural area had its own local governance starting with a town and road board and before the last amalgamation its own borough and county council with representatives elected from the area and their own assets. Amalgamation was to save costs and decrease numbers of elected representatives. We are our own community largely self sufficient and want and need a representative who understands, represents and advocates for our own Geraldine Community. To remove ward representation would make it almost impossible to get a representative on the TDC as even the lowest polling candidates votes equate to more than the entire voting population in the Geraldine ward. I believe we need our own ward representative who can advocate for us and also give rural people a voice. 718 J Parr Changing the present system will have no benefits for the Geraldine community. Works pretty well as it. We need to maintain representation by a Geraldine councillor who will understand the needs of the town and the people who live here. 719 A&S Bruce We wish to support the current ward system. It gives a better coverage of the working of council and any major works that may be forthcoming in the future. 720 E&A Adams We believe the loss of rural representation is not in the best interests of the Geraldine area as a whole. Rural representation means a councillor standing for Geraldine has a local knowledge and is more in touch with the needs of a rural area. As a community we have lost a great deal by joining the TDC. Machinery for snow and flood control is no longer here. We lost our community hall despite strong opposition. We raised local money to heat our swimming pool and are currently raising money to extend the museum. Our rates

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 72 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) are higher than the Timaru area despite the fact we pay for facilities (e.g. the Aquatic Centre and the Piazza that are of very limited use to us). We wish to have access to our councillor and for him to represent the views of we, the residents. How many councillors have travelled the length of breadth of the Geraldine ward and know the unique identity of us who live here? The present system works, please don’t change it. 721 A The ward system must be retained so rural Winkelman districts keep their representative. 723 A Robertson I want to keep Geraldine voice. 724 T Loftus I consider the adopted proposal to be the obvious and most sensible solution to the voting public. I hope this is also the popular choice for the people of the region. The other and previous selections were not at all suitable to me and hopefully most of the other ratepayers. So go for it. 725 A Young Ward system ensures a local representation. Ward system gives all communities a voice. Promotes local issues and views to the wider district. Community boards provide a starting point for people to advance to district level. 727 D Talbot I support the submission that there are 3 wards electing 9 councillors. Geraldine 1, Pleasant Point 2, Timaru 6. 728 L Neale I oppose the proposed change to the ward system for electing councillors. It is better to have one less on the council than to have councillors elected at large. One of the reasons is we currently have a council that is elected on value. To change to an ‘at large election’ will make the possibility of nation party affiliations becoming big factor in the election of candidates. 729 D Bruce I am totally in favour of retaining the present system of electing councillors. I do not support the 'at large' format that has been suggested. TDC area is a large one and has in it, a number of communities that, in themselves, have the services which are required to run a town such as Waimate, Pleasant Point and Geraldine to name three. All of these towns and areas have special characteristics and as such should have their own representation when it comes to dealing with issues that effect their town. With communities having their own representatives they at least have people who know and understand the local issues. If at large voting came in it's highly unlikely that any sympathetic ear would listen to small community

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 73 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) issues. Even the existing councillors who are not representing the smaller communities (e.g. Geraldine, have little understanding of Geraldine's special character). Communities are people and to that end the people's interest should be at the heart of any decision. I am in favour of the present system where Geraldine has its own representative and a community board as opposed to voting for councillors at large. 730 J Lyttle I support the proposal as adopted by the council. I believe this is the only truly democratic option. Rural voices need to be heard just as loudly as the urban voice even if numbers are greater in the urban area. The needs of communities differ greatly and a local representative is essential for every rural area. Less representation is not a welcome move. 731 86 I Bowan (summarised) Support option 2 as some of you will be aware I represented the Temuka ward for 12 years and the Timaru ward for 6 years as a councillor. I don’t believe many other councillors have had this opportunity of representing both wards. It is with this experience that I fully support the retention of the ward system. It would be an absolute disaster to have an election at large, as it took 15 years to get over the 1989 forced amalgamation, it would simply fragment the district. There has been an example of this happening already with Geraldine people saying they should be looking elsewhere. Timaru district only has a small population base and if it was to lose ratepayers it would put a huge weight back on the other ratepayers with a rate increase that nobody could afford. If central government was to have an election at large all our members of parliament could come from Auckland and I don’t think we would be happy with that. 732 87 L Leary (summarised) Support elect 9 councillors as is the current structure. Community interest: Geraldine a strong community spirit. Geraldine’s location is too far from Timaru. Works better with our own representative. Representative should be living within the area and be easily approachable by ratepayers if there is a problem that needs to be brought to the council table. The councillor representative would have a very good

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 74 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) knowledge of the area and the needs of the area.

TDC have taken away our community Hall and are trying to disrupt our swimming season with all sorts of rules and shorter hours, cooler temperature, increase fees and take away the swim coaching which is extremely important to the people without travel great distances. It is cases like this that we need our representative to support the community obtain and retain their facilities especially when it is a community funded facility. Not BROKEN SO DOESN’T NEED FIX UP. NO NEED FOR CHANGE. Current structure is effective. Provides a good geographical representation of the district. Fair system and gives us the greatest choice as we get to know who the candidates are. Provides a good balance of urban versus rural representation. 733 T Small I believe the proposal offers the best balance and likelihood of getting a council to represent the whole district. 734 N Small This is the best option, it will give us a balance and the best councillors. We need the best skills – but is must represent the whole region. Some of the best councillors have come from outside Timaru city. 735 K Chambers I support retaining the ward structure. Living in Geraldine we are a township in our own right and need representation as do the other areas. The public gave their view that they wanted the ward structure retained and some of the councillors went against it, going against what people wanted. That doesn’t give me a lot of faith in the council and I wonder what hidden agenda these particular councillors have. Surely the council is representing the public and their wishes, not making their own decisions. 737 90 F (summarised) Carmichael I live in the town of Geraldine and I pay residential rates. I don’t consider myself ‘rural’ so I don’t see it as a ‘rural vs urban’ issue at all. We have our own services, a distinct geographical landscape, our own economy and our own identity. A ward based system recognises our different needs, and not only gives us a voice, importantly it give us a vote. Our community board is accessible on a daily basis, and they are accountable to me as a ratepayer. Not only do I know all our board member’s names and faces, they know mine, I believe that they are well informed of our

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 75 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) community’s needs, and I know that I can go to them at any time. I could not vote in an at-large system with such certainty regarding who I was voting for, and with such trust that they would represent me at council meetings. I do not know and trust them as I do my local representatives. Do not agree with idea that an even number of votes is unfair. Am happy with 9 or 10 Councillors. Have faith in mayor’s casting vote and trust her judgement or any successor. All Councillors are representative of ratepayers and should have high level of personal integrity. Ward system works well and Geraldine has strong community which deserves own voice and vote. 738 S Peck The ward structure has worked well up to now. I like to know I have a ward councillor I can talk to is something comes up. I also can vote the ward councillors out if I think they are not doing the job. 740 J Leary I support the proposal because I believe the smaller communities need representation from a person living there. The Geraldine/Temuka and Pleasant Point communities need representation from a person with empathy for the place they live in and are not removed from that environment. 741 G Holland I support the initial (draft) proposal as per Council’s letter of 17 September 2012. I believe a balance of ‘rural’ and Timaru wards is essential for continued effective democracy. I understand that the outlying areas that joined with the Timaru city in 1989 were promised local representation at Council level (not only Community boards) and Council must honour this promise. This could be reconsidered if requested by those areas but not forced by a Timaru based majority. 742 A&M McKenzie We both support the present proposal to elect the Council from 3 wards and community boards in the 3 smaller centres. 743 H&G Hunter We believe that the present ward system better as a fair and balanced system by which our city and rural councillors are elected. At no time do we want to see party politics become part of local government and the ward system would make this much more difficult to achieve. We prefer the present system as we know our local representative who are very familiar with local needs and services and prefer to make personal approaches rather than to an unknown person by phone. 744 P&F Boulton We support the current ward structure. This

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 76 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) protects a guaranteed vote for us along with geographical representation. To ensure a balance of rural/urban representation. We do support the community board proposal. 745 B&J 1. Geraldine ward covers the largest O’Keefe geographical area of the 3 wards so needs a local representative. 2. It is preferable to speak to a local representative as he/she will be well versed on local issues. It is better to talk to someone you know rather than someone who lives out of the area and probably has little understanding local issues. 3. If the 10 councillors at large proposal was adopted all councillors could come from Timaru creating a real fear the country areas could miss out on funding. 4. A system that does not guarantee rural based representation (i.e. ten councillors at large) could prove very detrimental to Timaru city businesses. If Geraldine ward had no representative on TDC there would be serious consideration given to breaking away from Timaru and joining Ashburton district. We like to support the district which provides our services. 746 G Woods I am in favour of a mayor being voted in at large along with 6 wards in Timaru, 2 in Pleasant Point/Temuka and 1 for the Geraldine ward. The mayor has shown herself to be fairly representing the district at large and not just Timaru so I feel far happier with this than the previous proposal for 10 councillors and a mayor at large. 747 G&S Ford It is vital that Geraldine has a WARD councillor as its residents need a voice on the council. We require someone who knows the district like the back of their hands, which an outsider would not have a clue about. Imagine calling someone who lives outside the area and advising that person of a problem in the area. This person will have no insight to what the problem really is. However, that would not be the case if the person is a LOCAL! Most of all, the Geraldine ward councillor would have the interests of the locals at heart and would do his/her best to get decisions made that benefitted the Geraldine area. Hoping the action on the above will be positive. 748 M Jackson I believe that the community of interest is best served by the ward system of elections. 749 92 South (summarised)

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 77 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) Canterbury SCFF supports the proposal that the Council Federated comprise nine members elected from 3 wards as Farmers - described in the public Notice of initial proposal, B Douglas plus the mayor (elected at large). We also support the constitution of the community boards as described in the public notice. Important for all communities of interest to be represented around the Council table. Community Board structure provide for good input from those communities. 751 P&W Milne We wish to submit the following: That we retain the same ward boundaries – one councillor elected in the Geraldine ward and two councillors in the Pleasant Point / Temuka ward. That six councillors be elected in the Timaru ward. 752 95 R Lundie (summarised) I am strongly in favour of retaining the rural wards as it is at present. When Strathallan combined with Timaru ward, one of the selling points was that the rural areas were guaranteed to remain. For this to be overridden should come from the rural people. Timaru councillors have undone goodwill between city and country that has built up. Geraldine breakaway could also apply to Pleasant Point and Temuka. Would save us from paying for new pool. 754 R Carter I strongly recommend and support the retention of the 'Ward' system and representation of the Council. While there are advantages and disadvantages on the systems discussed, the Ward system is the only method that assures all areas of the District are represented at the Council Table. It also assures Residents and Ratepayers in all areas that they are represented by their elected Ward representatives who are more readily accessible and fully understand the needs of their Ward. The advantages of the Ward System therefore far out way those of the ‘At Large’ method of electing a Council. 755 S Brookland I feel that the current system of having rural representation in the council is a very sound and balanced idea and should continue going forward. 756 J Cummin I wish to make a submission for the council’s representation review which is currently underway. I agree with the proposal that one councillor should be elected for Geraldine. Also two for Pleasant Point and six Timaru. I also agree that the three community boards should be

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 78 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) elected as proposed. 757 96 D Gresham (summarised) Support Council’s proposal “that the council comprise 9 members elected from 3 wards and the mayor elected at large”. Geraldine a distinct community of interest, with numerous service provided and available. Operated as a separate but complimentary area within the Timaru District. Community chooses representatives through involvement in community activity and not a party political process. Important to retain distinct representation. 759 R Esler I agree with the proposal of 3 wards, Geraldine, Pleasant Point, Temuka and Timaru with 9 councillors. This is the only way these areas will be represented. I also support the community board proposal. 760 M Chapman It is essential we retain a rural voice around the Council table. They understand the issues that affect rural communities because they live, often work and socialise in these communities. The rural area of the TDC is large and unless the ward system is retained there is every likelihood of there being no rural representative around the council table. They can give both a ‘local’ voice to many of the issues which affect the whole district but also have a wide perspective of the district. It is also important to have a local councillor who the locals know and feel confident enough to approach and talk to about a local issue and have it understood. 761 G Chapman We must retain a rural voice around the council table. Timaru district has a large rural catchment and unless the ward system is retained there is every likelihood that could be no rurally based councillors to give the rural perspective. At the time of amalgamation the rural areas were promised representation at the council table and while it took some time to gel, TDC now works well with the urban/rural mix. If it is not broke why fix it. 762 E Lange Support initial draft proposal. 763 D&S Law As residents, ratepayers and business owners operating in Geraldine, we strongly support the existing ward system of representation on the TDC. Geraldine is a special town with a full range of clubs, sporting organisations, business and health support which makes the town autonomous within the Timaru district. Whilst we

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 79 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) recognise the Geraldine is best represented within the TDC, we maintain that it is essential that the ward system of representation is retained for our town and district. 764 P Stayt I am writing in support of the retention of the current ward voting system. I believe in a region that contains one major population centre but also other significant, independent communities such Geraldine, Temuka & Pleasant Point it is fundamental to a working democracy that these areas have formal elected representation on council that can represent their community interests. An at large voting system will not guarantee representation for these communities as the Timaru urban voting base is so large in comparison to these smaller communities that it is very likely all elected councillors will come from the Timaru urban area. I read comments by those councillors supporting the at large proposal with some dismay. Would these same people who believe ‘at large’ voting systems provide adequate representation for smaller communities take the same position if a reconfigured Ecan only had councillors voted in on the same basis – with no guaranteed SC representation? 765 W Blair I support the present ward system we have in place. This system gives all regions and people a fair representation. Other options you have listed (especially the 10 at large) is open to pressure groups forming and block voting. These other options can also become political with left against right. The present ward system is regional based and that is what local body council is all about. Please stick with the present ward system. 766 P McCullough The rural members need their own vote. Also think it’s unfair the way persons in Timaru paying less than $1,500 on rates can vote for 6 or 7 councillors yet a person in Temuka/Geraldine only gets to vote for 1 or 2 yet pay $5,000 plus in rates. 767 100 A McMillan (summarised) Supports the retention of the current ward structure. • The advisory panel put forward 3 options, all of which retained the ward structure. • Initial public consultation overwhelmingly favoured the current ward structure.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 80 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) • All public meetings to date have favoured the ward structure. • Analysis using Statistics NZ’s urban areas supports retaining the wards. • Councillors supporting at Large appear to be pushing their own agenda. 768 R Ingrey No rates without representation, no super city for Timaru. Ask the outer suburbs of Auckland their answer is NO to central government control. 770 A Key “Don’t fix what isn’t broke”. 771 M Marsden I believe the present system is the best option but I also believe the rural areas do not have enough representation. 773 J Hopa I support the proposal to have elections through the ward system although I am very disappointed that Geraldine’s representation has been reduced to one elected member. There is no fairer way than the proposal especially now that there appears to be an influx of politically biased individuals currently serving on council. A Mayor elected at large is supported along with the wards served by community boards. 774 A Lemmens I support present proposal. 775 J Lemmens I support the present proposal. 777 C&D McKechnie We support the current ward system where Geraldine has 1 councillor. Michael Oliver supported our endeavours of the Geraldine Cinema and was very influential in clarifying the Public Hall status for our special liquor licences for “Live Performances”. We doubt such support from a non local councillor. 778 I&M We strongly support the retention of the ward Mayman system for election of councillors to the TDC. 779 113 J Shirtcliff (summarised) Support the proposal to retain the ward based system of local government representation with the Timaru district. Appalled at the first decision (since rescinded) to change to ‘at large’ representation and running counter to the weight of submissions provided. Consider that presently proposed retention of ward-based representation to be entirely suited to the nature of the district consisting, as it does of four quite distinct and easily identifiable communities of interest around which the residents of the District conduct their daily affairs. Timaru District is quite different in character from the “at large” exemplars (Wanganui, Rotorua and Nelson) Ward-based representation reduces the excesses

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 81 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) that may result from political or ticket-based campaigning which could potentially disenfranchise rural communities and favour the larger urban population centre’s interests. The District has such a strongly rural component to its character that it is critical to ensure that the rural needs and views are strongly represented by elected councillors that are directly accessible and accountable.” At large” politics are more likely, in my view, to be more potentially destructive and alienating of sections of the community than the present system. The election of the mayor “at large” is quite appropriate. 780 A Nelson The present ward system provides a fair representation for rural communities of which Geraldine is the urban centre. This town has a balance of support for business, education, social services, library, medical, dental, physio, pharmacy etc. as well as a well used Resource Centre where outside agencies regularly attend. All of this avoids the need for residents to travel a distance for these services. Sports are well catered for, swimming pools, artistic groups and Churches almost entirely run by volunteers (sadly our Community Centre Hall was never replaced). Our local ward councillor and community board members have always been well informed of needs and services needed. How often do Timaru based councillors (except for the Mayor) visit this “Jewel” in the district to understand the needs of locals. Our high rates load seems unbalanced compared to the ratio of expenditure here. Not for us, extra rates for grandiose facilities, we work hard to raise our own funds. Keep the ward system, the TDC will gain greater respect from the more remote areas!!! 781 G Priddle Rural people need a voice in local government. The ward system guarantees that. Also a locally elected councillor is going to be more enthusiastic about local issues and will represent the community accordingly at the council table. 782 P&J Coles Why fix something that isn’t broken? It would be counter-productive to harmonious urban/rural relationships to change the current election system. There needs to be an understanding of rural and urban issues and this can only be achieved with consultation and fair representation of the immediate and wider communities of the

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 82 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) TDC. Without the ward system there is no guarantee of effective representation of rural communities. We support the proposal of 3 wards and the Mayor elected at large. 783 R Nelson Keep the current ward system! We lost much following the earlier amalgamation from Strathallan County and Geraldine Borough Council. This ward is well served under the present local government and the community knows that the best way to provide necessary facilities is to roll up our sleeves and raise the money ourselves. Rates from this ward are already assessed at a high level we should not be levied extra to pay for Timaru based large projects which many here may never visit let alone use. 784 J Gibb The ward system ensures a balanced urban/rural representation. The ward system works well so there is no need for change. 785 H Simpson I support the proposal that council consists of 3 wards electing a total of 9 councillors. Geraldine, 1 councillor elected, Pleasant/Temuka 2 councillors elected, Timaru 6 councillors elected. Community boards – Community boards, 3 co mmunity boards electing a total of 16 members. It is vital to the communities involved that they have their own representative on the council, someone they know who lives in their area and that they feel they can approach with their problems as opposed to contacting a stranger who has no affinity to either the community or its inhabitants. 786 G Scott I have lived in Geraldine for my whole life (58 years) and I believe it is important for there to be a member on council from all wards who has a voice that can represent all those who live within their district. When a smaller town gets amalgamated within larger towns and cities their wants and needs I believe tend to be lost in the wants and needs of the larger representatives. Therefore, I support the wards system for Geraldine to have the ability to maintain its voice. 787 K Aker 1. Geraldine is a thriving town and the centre for the district. People are friendly and look out for each other. This is what makes us strong. Many visitors and new residents think this too. Our council representatives have always worked hard for us and long may this continue. The services council should provide and actually do, have been regressing of late

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 83 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) which must be addressed. 2. A local person ‘must’ represent our area otherwise we will continue to lose out while at the same time see our portion of rates continue to rise. 3. Having a ‘strong’ voice from our community with the backing of the locals has always been a winner and so will do again. 788 T Gibb To keep local government local. The ward system is a fair, balanced and simple system. 789 M Young • The ward system will ensure representation of communities of interest. • The ward system is a fair structure and a simple system. • Ward system will ensure Temuka, Geraldine, Pleasant get balanced representation. • Ward system retains geographical representation. • The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at council table. • The ward system reduces the likelihood of party politics becoming engrained in local government. • The ward system works so there is no need to change. If not broken, no need to fix. • To keep a local voice in local government. • When we were incorporated in the Timaru Council area, we were promised we would always have representation on the Council. If we do not maintain the ward system we will be outvoted by population vote (i.e. Timaru is much larger than Temuka, Geraldine or Pleasant Point). 790 S Hessell I believe how the system is now gives a true cross section of representation which is fair and equitable. 791 R Hessell The ward system gives a fair rural and urban voice and it should remain. 792 R Bradley The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. We need to keep a local voice in local government. 793 M I wish to strongly support the retention of a ward Blakemore system. The suggested ‘at large system’ would be yet another disenfranchise of the rural vote which has already been downgraded through local body amalgamation. The at large system would also be a probably move towards creating party politics which would be disastrous as it already is in

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 84 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) central government. The ward system worked extremely well in county government for a long period of time. 794 L Haywood I have always felt that this is the best option. Timaru and the surrounding districts (i.e. Geraldine and Temuka/Pleasant Point). I chose this option first time around and still support it. 795 115 Temuka (summarised) Community • The Board firmly believes that local Board representation on Council is vital and the area needs to be represented by someone from the community who has a feeling for the local people and their issues. • The Temuka ward is a geographically identifiable community of interest, best served by separate representation. • The Temuka Community Board would like to see the board comprising 5 community board members and 2 appointed members in order to give a strong local voice for the community. 796 J Phiskie (no comments) 797 B Maxwell I believe that it is important that the outlying areas have their own representative. It is someone local who is known to local ratepayers. If national elections were held on a countrywide basis and all the MPs came from Auckland I am sure that we would feel disenfranchised. 798 St Joseph’s We, the board of Trustees of St Joseph’s School School in Temuka support the Council’s initial proposal to Temuka ‘elect 9 councillors through the current ward Board of structure’. We feel that this is the only proposal Trustees – that provides for a voice for our town and retains L Baillie the community/rural representation. We also wish to maintain a fair share of the Council revenue for rural amenities. We have no acceptance at all for Option 1. 799 P Ward-Smith Support the proposal due to: • current system works • urban/rural representation • population based representation. 802 S Bradley The ward system protects a guaranteed vote for rural communities at the council table. We need to keep a local voice in local government. The ward structure is fair and balanced system that ensures a urban/rural representation. An effective representation of communities of interest. 803 G Parr I feel that if you cannot see out councillor on the street and talk face to face, then you are talking to a stranger who might not have the passion of the

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 85 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) rural community. I think if we lose our councillor of community choice we as a community will lose control of future issues. 804 Temuka and The A & P Association is concerned that if the Geraldine option of ten councillors to be elected ‘at large’ is A&P chosen, we could see a situation where there are Association no councillors elected who reside in the Geraldine - H Sheed ward. There could be a councillor from another area representing Geraldine at Council who may have no interest in our community that would be the extreme. Temuka and Geraldine A & P run a very well organised show the first weekend in March which draws a large crowd from surrounding district. Timaru A & P unfortunately went into receivership because of lack of support. Temuka A & P is held on Council ground but the Association own all the buildings. 805 B&W Nelson We are quite happy with the status quo and may it continue. 806 S Haugh Geraldine has a good record for taking an interest in council happenings, both locally and in the wider district and responding to issues e.g. positioning Aquatic Centre in Timaru; discussion on road changes through Talbot Forest; re-development of Caroline Bay. Many people make submissions on these matters and we like to talk to our local councillor about them. The ward system has worked well and it is definitely an advantage to have a local member. The late Michael Oliver was very approachable, would always listen carefully and supported many worthwhile local projects. I would expect a new councillor to do likewise. Community Board: With a good cross section of members the 6 person community board has worked well. Decision sought : TDC accept proposal as outlined above. 807 J Thomson Some years ago Mrs Eullo-Williamson (now deceased) a past mayor of Geraldine wrote a letter to the Timaru Herald to remind citizens that Geraldine was drawn into the Timaru electorate by circumstances beyond its control and a condition of our complying was a seat on the Timaru Council. How dare you now say that that condition is no longer of any consequence. 808 S Wilson I am a Geraldine homeowner and ratepayer and I believe as a rural community with its own specific needs and opinions we need to have a voice which comes from having a ward system where

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 86 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) there is representation from our area. 809 D Kenny I/we support the above proposal because it is important for the future growth and prosperity of the Geraldine Community. A Geraldine councillor will give a superior representation to our district. A representative councillor from Timaru will not be able to give fair attention when they have their own agendas to consider. 810 T Nelson I fully support the ward system as it currently stands. It is essential that we have a voice for our rural communities as was promised us when Geraldine amalgamated with Timaru. Having worked in both Timaru and Geraldine where community voice was an essential part of our organisation, what was clearly evident was that the people within their own communities know them best. Although by distance Timaru is relatively close, in terms of local need and understanding and responding to this can only effectively occur if we have representation from our community. We are a diverse community which needs to be celebrated and enhanced to continue the effective growth of South Canterbury. This can only happen if those who know our community (i.e. someone elected by our community within our community is able to stand). 811 D&M Coker It is most important to have a spread representation so as to have a fully informed opinion of business concerning the whole district. We hate to think where the South Island would be if central government was elected at large or government decided to have Canterbury as one super council. It is only fair for the outlying areas to be represented by councillors who know the area, we do not want to look as just a rate take. Geraldine is the centre for overseas tourists to the district and needs to be fairly represented on the Council. 812 A Davidson I definitely support the continued representation of individual wards on the council. It’s very necessary for someone who knows the district and its people at first hand to be able to speak and vote for us. Surely this is what democracy means? 813 G Kenny The support of this proposal is important to the Geraldine community for the future growth of this district. There cannot and will not be any representation from outside this district by a Timaru Councillor. Each Timaru Councillor has their own agendas to challenge for. I recommend

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 87 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) the proposal be supported . 814 116 M Simpson (summarised) Support • Mayor of the Timaru district elected at large, • Nine councillors elected through 3 wards - (Geraldine ward 1 councillor, Pleasant Point/Temuka ward 2 councillors and Timaru ward 6 councillors). • Three community boards elected with the following membership - Geraldine (6 members elected plus the Geraldine ward councillor be appointed member), Pleasant Point (5 members elected plus the 2 Pleasant Point-Temuka ward councillors be appointed members), Temuka (5 members elected plus the 2 Pleasant Point-Temuka ward councillors be appointed members). • Elections be conducted on a first past the post voting system. • No change to the ward boundaries. 815 G Tither I strongly support the retention of the Geraldine ward councillor to safeguard the interests of Geraldine residents. 816 L Tither I support the retention of the Geraldine Ward councillor to safeguard the interests of the Geraldine residents. 817 S McCullough That country areas need their own voice and that is why when council amalgamations occurred these were set up. I do not think that all council members have the same feel for the rural areas if they do not live in it or are part of it. So it is important to have a local from that area to be the voice. Fairness, knowledge and equality go a long way.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 88 29 October 2012

Summary of Submissions Opposing Initial Proposal

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council Meeting Doc # 792738 89 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 23 4 R Scobie (summarised) Support 5 Councillors for Timaru and 5 for rural wards. Promised as part of amalgamation. Can’t change this agreement. Support input from community boards to Council and Board members having the right to speak at Council meetings. 50 31 P McAuley (summarised) Support ward system, but would prefer Timaru ward to be divided into six wards with one Councillor each. Ward system has worked well for rural areas, and should be applied to Timaru ward as well. Would prefer to deal with one Councillor. 151 H Rich It is not in the best interests of the district to have 9 councillors plus the mayor making up 10 votes. This will give the mayor position the additional power of the casting vote much more frequently which is an unacceptable situation for democratic solutions. 152 L Gregory I submitted in favour of the At Large Option and am astounded that after it was voted on by Councillors, that others from the Council could be so upset by it that they put forward a motion, and had another vote to overturn it. That sounds very, very odd to me. Is that the way this Council runs? The publicity has been poor - the information misleading, and quite frankly it's all been a bit embarrassing to watch it being badly played out. I did some serious reading and study of the issue and have been disappointed that the discussion was one-sided, lacked integrity - and yet the public seemed to be sucked in by the poor media coverage. (Any surprises there?) It's because of this that I am even more opposed to the new suggestion. I don't want to live in a region where the mayor (or anyone else) effectively has a second vote (in the case of a split decision). On that basis alone I oppose the new suggestion. We need to find a way around this problem. Quickly. 153 C I am in favour of at 10 councillors at large option. Cvitanich 154 K McKenzie I believe we should try to break down the "rural/urban" divide - which is perhaps more perceived than real. I agree that non- urban voters (i.e. those not in the city/town of Timaru) need a voice; so I suggest 2 representative "wards" - "urban" & "rural". There would be, say, 5 elected from urban & 4 from rural. Community Boards would remain, as is. 155 M Easton I wish to state my preference for option 1. That is 10 councillors for the district at large. I support this option because I believe it will strengthen the workings of council. We are too small a community to take a parochial approach to issues on a ward basis. National politicians have shrunk our community of interest over the years. I want to see a council that takes a holistic approach to our district. 463 D York Why change something which doesn’t need fixing. The set up

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 90 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) as now works perfectly. Villagers are represented well and know who represents them. Ratepayers are adamant - no taxation without representation - wars have been waged over this. The TDC are already squandering enough money on things they have no business being involved with. ENOUGH! This proposal will pour more rate money after present wastage. Change nothing. P.S. Rates are far too high here and nationwide. There will be trouble! 485 H Tee I support the election of 9 councillors AT LARGE because TDC has control of all rates paid, therefore all councillors make decisions as to spending of rates. As a Pleasant Point resident one councillor under the current ward system is not fair. I need to vote for all councillors who make the big decisions. 489 L Tee Not democratic. Why should Timaru voters have six votes each and other citizens only one or two votes. Are Timaru citizens superior to their county neighbours?

If councillors were to be elected at large they would each have to show more interest in the whole district to keep their seats on the council. That is country votes would count at election time.

I live in Pleasant Point. I may have great confidence in one or two particular council candidates and would like to see them elected. But no, Pleasant Point residents don’t have the democratic right in the proposal.

AT LARGE election all candidates to be successful seemingly need to be aware of town and country concerns and developments. Voters would be looking to vote for candidates with a broad knowledge of the Timaru District area, their needs and their development.

The initial proposal means less for country and country towns and more for Timaru. Add Geraldine and Pleasant Point/Temuka votes at Council meetings and Timaru elected councillors are still able to out number them which gives the latter the final say in matters. Savings too without the ward system. 578 P Binns No system of representation will be fully satisfactory to everyone. So it is a question of finding the fairest, most practicable and effective method. To that end I support 10 councillors elected at large as originally proposed as the first option in August. I think this will give everyone, urban and rural, the best chance of effective and diverse representation at Council. Each Councillor will be accountable to the entire electorate and each voter will have the chance to vote for a wide variety of candidates. In TDC’s relatively small rural wards many people are probably left with little real choice in voting, since they are going to end up with only one or two

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 91 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) representatives. The rural wards will probably be better served by having representatives from their committees with speaking rights at Council, than they are at present. It is good that provision has already been made for this by a recent Council decision. Your current proposal is I think an unsatisfactory compromise. As well as retaining the restricted opportunities of the ward system, it would return a total of 9 councillors. This may result in increasing use of a mayoral casting vote in close run cased, which defeats the object of democratic decision making. In conclusion, I urge the Council to return to the original preferred option of electing 10 councillors at large. 580 J Walker I strongly oppose the status quo voting option for deciding our council. My preferred voting option is 10 at large because I want everyone to have the right and opportunity to vote for all the council seats available. I think the current system is unfair because some people get into council because they are the only ones from that seats area to stand. If you are unhappy with the person whom is going to be your voice on council you should be given the right to vote them out and under the status quo option this right can be taken away. When we get to vote for our council everyone should be given the same choices. If only one person stands for an area seat and gets in solely because there is no-one else to vote for we all lose out. Please give us all the right and opportunity to vote for every member of the council so that everyone’s voice and vote counts no matter what area of the district you live in . 582 C Young I oppose the draft proposal of electing 9 councillors and keeping the ward system and would like the Council to re-visit the option of electing 10 councillors ‘at large’. Failing this, if there is only one person standing for a ward (i.e. no contest), then the election for that ward should automatically become ‘at large’. My reasons are: 1. Due to the fact that the population bases of the wards are so small the councillors are often returned unopposed, which is undemocratic. 2. The “at large” voting system is more competitive and opens up the field to high calibre candidates and gives the voters the choice. Any councillor with integrity will not be so parochial as to be blind to the needs of the various communities in the district. 3. It is so easy to communicate with any councillor now thanks to various technologies that it almost makes the ward system redundant. 4. A prime example of how poorly the ward system has served us in the Kerrytown Road area and other parts of Levels is the regular flooding and closing of the roads and then the money wasted repairing them, with no attempt at a solution. Apparently this has been going on for 30 years or more. No councillor representing the ward can claim they don’t know about it. 588 B Voice I am recently retired from the TDC where my role was

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 92 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) working in Engineering Services as Utilities Renewals & Development Engineer. In my view the TDC is well placed to deliver the 3 waters services to the district in a well managed and cost effective manner. For the delivery of these services the council has robust renewal strategies in place for the renewal of the 3 water services at the optimal effective life. Supporting these strategies are prioritized 20 year rolling renewal programs which have been developed through the use of hydraulic computer modelling. TDC has invested heavily and has very good information on the conditions and hydraulic performances of the 3 waters services which is used to develop the renewal programs but of equal importance is the communities wishes and wellbeing that needs to go into the mix when prioritizing the renewal/development programs. All of that information is paramount to the successful timing and effectiveness of the services renewals. In my roll as UR & D Engineer and in my experience, determining the wishes and understanding the wellbeing of he community, is best obtained through a community board and to maintain a balance in the priority of works the community needs a voice in council. The community board and its council representative/s are the eyes and ears of the council and could be a very valuable asset to Council in achieving a united district. It is also my view the present council is not utilizing the potential effectiveness of the community board. My submission is that the TDC retain the community board system with a council representative/s, and work more closely with the board so as to maximise the boards potential. (I might suggest here that the TDC would be in the top 5% of Councils in NZ to be this far advanced in the delivery of these services at optimal cost). I ask, no I beg, Council not to go the track of nullifying the community board and its council representative/s system but to make much better use of the resources available to them. 595 G Wright The custom of electing district councillors to specific wards and supplementing these with community boards, stems from the days when communications were difficult or non-existent and a journey to town consumed many hours of travel. Then there was justification for electing locally domiciled reps charged with conveying to Council the views and concerns of their constituents. There are now no bars to communication and there would be few in the district who do not have personal transport, a telephone and access to the internet. Reference to page 44 of the Guide to Your Council on the top of “Having your Say” displays a number of ways for an individual or a group to convey matters directly to the Council. The advantage of any of these methods is that resident(s) may convey thoughts or concerns directly to the Council, rather than through an intermediary and without risk of distortion. Such ease of contract negates the need for discrete ward or sub-district representation. The suggestion therefore that eliminating the locally elected ward councillors

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 93 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) would tend to infringe upon representation of outlying Communities, is fallacious and without merit. Further, this custom is divisive and lends itself to the introduction of bias and partisan pressure. Council business attaches mainly to infrastructure and services which are carried out by staff or contractors against pre-approved plans and budgets. The occasional minor matter can be dealt with by direct contact. So how much representation is necessary? I would therefore support the proposal for the election of 10 councillors at large. This would not only be the democratic and efficient, effectively service the needs of the entire district but open the election to more candidates district wide. 596 52 D Stanton (summarised) Geraldine ward represents 65% of district land area, and similar number for tourism visitors, accommodation providers, adventure activities, boutique/organic good producers and artists etc. Regional Council has failed to represent rural areas. Geraldine ward should be represented by a return to 2 Councillors for a total of ten Councillors. Other option is to choose to join Ashburton or Mackenzie. 604 57 G Ligtenberg (summarised) Oppose the reviewed proposal of keeping the ward system and elect 9 councillors. I support the elect 10 councillors at large option. Not convinced the ward system is the most democratic one. Elect 10 at large can be adapted so that small communities can have their say and influence. Suggest a set budget for each ward to spend at their own discretion. Argument high ratepayers should have more influence against democratic principles of spending rates for the good of residents. Important all voters get right to elect the local councillors. Mayor should not have a casting vote every time a controversial issue is at stake. Status quo can stop innovative ideas. 607 B&S Rhodes Like to make a submission on the ward system, Steve and Bev would like to see the ward system gone. Wish to vote for all councillors. 611 D Tutton I wish to support the 10 councillors elected at large option. This being the only true democratic option on the table. As to this option denying the rural areas any voice, one would assume that the elected councillors are all reasonably intelligent and are aware that our district is greater than the sum of the Timaru urban area. 612 60 D Fitzgerald (summarised) Preference for the 10 councillors at large option with retention of the community boards. Important for Timaru ward to be able to vote for the whole council as under the present system the Geraldine, Temuka and Pleasant Point councillors have voting rights over matters that affect the Timaru population too. If I lived in one of the rural wards I would also want the chance to vote on the Timaru ward candidates. Like the idea of the Community Boards being given speaking

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 94 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) rights at Council. Would also like to see the Timaru Ward Committee reintroduced as it is quite impersonal speaking at the public forum on a minor sort of issue such as trees or roading etc. 613 K Foley I favour 10 councillors elected at large for the following reasons: • A better chance to have the best people elected regardless of where they live. • Less likely to have one incumbent in a small ward elected without the benefit of wider opposition. • Strong community boards will keep councillors on their toes. • An over emphasis on the ward system can lead to tribalism and really are just lines on maps and can be artificial distinctions rather than real communities of interest. 639 B Suter I submit that the existing ward structure be continued but reduced to 2 wards – the existing Timaru ward and an amalgamated Geraldine/Pleasant Point/Temuka ward. The benefits of this would be: • Ensure reasonable rural community representation • Recognises that councillors are to act in the best interests of Timaru district and not just their own community • Will encourage a greater variety of candidates • This would also allow for increased public interest in the rural ward, noting that there was no election in either rural ward in the 2010 election. • Specific communities of interest are still protected by the election of community boards. 640 69 G Smith (summarised) Support option of TDC elected by ward structure, plus three Councillors elected at large, for a total of 12 Councillors. Important to retain the ward structure due to the demographics of South Canterbury and the four main towns each surrounded by a rural hinterland receiving fair and effective representation. At large positions opens the door for a candidate to seek election without fear of splitting votes in a ward. 716 B Jopp We believe in democracy. Therefore, we think the 10 councillors at large, the more democratic way of electing a council. We have faith in the voting public’s ability to choose an appropriate council, regardless of where they reside. If they make the odd wrong selection, there is an election every three years. The ward voting system seems a relic of the horse and cart era and an unnecessary division between rural and urban. It is time for a different election system. This is the view of retired farmers. 722 L Peck I oppose the proposal to change the wards. • Keep 1 in Geraldine ward. • Keep 1 in Temuka ward. • Keep 1 in Pleasant Point and • Keep 7 in Timaru ward.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 95 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) 726 K Peck I oppose the proposal to change the ward system. Keep as existing situation. 736 88 S Blackstock (summarised) I would really like to see the at large option. Reasons: 1. The ward councillors do not actively canvass the country area – by this I mean those who live outside the boundary of Temuka-Pleasant Point. 2. Those on TDC who were concerned came to visit us but we could not reward their concern with our votes. 3. We elect people to represent our district. Hence we should be able to vote for whoever best serves out district. It is the quality of the candidate and his principles rather than where a person lives. 4. Two people from a ward (or even 1) does not mean that the person represented has the interest of the locals. Nor does it mean that you get the best person elected. 5. Two people representing a community have little sway at the District council when it comes to voting 6. Would increase the real and genuine concern of those elected to work for the whole district 7. Option to making councillors accountable for their decisions and rulings. 739 C Dusch I support 10 councillors at large voting system. 750 J Rushton The option for 10 at large should be presented to the public. It is not uncommon to have more than one alternative in voting. The fact that the Council originally voted for this option should give strong credence to its validity. 753 M Harding The proposed option (retention) of the ward system disenfranchises people in the Geraldine ward. All councillors are required to represent District-wide views but we only get to vote for one. Views of the Geraldine ward are more appropriately articulated through the Geraldine Community Board. 758 97 J Lobb (summarised) Commend to the council Option 3 of the advisory panel where three councillors are elected at large in addition to the nine by the ward basis. Community Boards should be 5 members each with 2 appointed for Pleasant Point – Temuka and 1 for Geraldine. Reasons: • Nine Councillors provides less representation • Even number of Councillors is the Norm (plus the Mayor) • TDC would be better served with 12 Councillors • Additional 3 Councillors at large provides fairer representation • Option 3 a timely compromise 769 107 J (summarised) . Finlayson Oppose the council’s present proposition that council comprise nine members elected from three wards. My proposal is for a council of ten at large. Reasons include: • Representation by ten at large councillors will significantly

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 96 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) reduce potential for votes, particularly in small wards, to feel (and be) disenfranchised. • Representation by a council of ten elected on a district- wide scale will mean that voters’ electoral choices and ongoing relationships with council are more meaningful and positive than at present and under the proposed model. • Election at large establishes an expectation that all councillors will be engaged with and knowledgeable about all corners of the district. • Election at large is fundamentally more democratic than the present and proposed systems and is replacing first past-the-post systems throughout New Zealand. • Ten councillors will represent the people better than nine representatives, in numbers and in experience. Analysis of reasons for support of initial proposal also summarised.

Election at large of a council of ten will be good for voters by increasing their basic democratic rights and electoral effectiveness. Beyond this point, there are numerous practical means of further improving democracy in the district. Will encourage Councillors to work together and raise expectations for quality of council-community relationships. Includes ideas for improving interaction between Councillors and people they represent. 772 J Scott I support the ten councillors at large option. As a resident in the Pleasant Point Ward I cannot vote for other councillors. Area representatives could be selected after the election and if they do not live in the area should not be a problem. The method of voting should be the STV system. Hopefully by everyone getting to vote, we would get the top ten people to be our councillors.

776 111 T Howey (summarised) Support Option 3, namely: Elect 3 councillors ‘at large’ and 9 councillors through the current ward structure. Objective of review should be to ensure we have the best governance structure that will give leadership resulting in prosperity and wellbeing across the whole district. Merit in the concept that the wider a well informed voting public can select from and vote for, the better the calibre of the makeup of the Council. Problem with at large is that those living in the rural areas may find that they are outvoted by the larger urban area voter numbers and have no effective voice in Council Should recognize that in the South Canterbury rural areas/townships there are separate communities of interest. It is important they have representation and FEEL that their concerns and votes count. The submissions from these rural and small town voters should be given preeminent consideration in this review. To get the balance right between 'best governance' and 'fair

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 97 29 October 2012

Sub Page No. Name Reasons/Comments No. (In Submissions Volume, where applicable) representation' only Option 3 delivers this. The benefits of Option 3 include: 1. It bridges the rural/urban divide that has unfortunately re- emerged through this review process. 2. It allows ward representation to "community of interest" groups. 3. It allows all voters to vote for candidates across the whole district thereby empowering voters and should result in a better calibre of elected councillors 4. It will engage all voters in the electoral process, even where there are uncontested nominations in ward areas 5. With more elected councillors than the other options, Option 3 allows the workload of councillors to be spread. 800 M Eaton & We would like to oppose the representation review. We are D Williams against the ward system. It leaves gaps open for continued secrecy. And it leaves inequality amongst councillors. We support the ‘at large’ proposal. It is more ‘open’, minimizing risk of secrecy. It also brings more equality amongst our elected councillors. Things are not working as they are, we need a change...a change for the good. 801 M Upston We would like to oppose the representative review. We are against the ward system. It leaves too many gaps for continued secrecy. Leaves inequality among councillors. We support the ‘at large’ system. It is more open with less secrecy and brings more equality among affected councillors. Things aren’t working as is. We need a change – for the good/better.

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 98 29 October 2012

Timaru District Council Extraordinary Council meeting Doc # 792738 99 29 October 2012