View Inevitable

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

View Inevitable In this Issue December 2016 Who pays the piper? 2 Sky City Entertainment Group AGM 29 AIA appoints its 3rd Future Director 4 Methven AGM 29 2016 NZSA Business Story of the year 5 Vital HealthcareProperty Trust AGM 30 A Message from the Chairman 2016 Beacon Award Winner Anounced 6 Mercury AGM 31 Membership Gift Certificate 8 NZ Oil and Gas AGM 32 A small step towards Commonsense Tax 8 Barramundi and Marlin Global 33 Investors have certainly had an interesting year! I hope for most of you it Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) 101 - Steel and Tube AGM 34 The latest buzz 9 Delegat Group AGM 34 has been a positive one. The dramas surrounding Pumpkin Patch and especially Company Meetings Airwork Holdings AGM 35 Wynyard will have caught out some, but the correction during October should A2 Milk AGM 11 Tourism Holdings AGM 36 SLI Systems AGM 37 not have surprised market watchers. Political uncertainty around the globe EBOS AGM 13 (and at home) along with likely increases to interest rates and inflation and the Veritas AGM 14 Skellerup Holdings AGM 38 Contact Energy AGM 15 Freightways AGM 39 potential fall in house prices in some overheated areas such as Auckland will Genesis Energy AGM 16 Caught on the Net 40 bring challenges and opportunities. So 2017 certainly promises to be interesting. Comvita AGM 17 Branch Reports Tegel AGM 18 Auckland. 42 For the NZSA, it has been another big year. A highlight (or should that Precinct Properties AGM 19 Waikato 44 really be lowlight?) was our success in removing a sitting director at Rakon. Cavalier Corporation AGM 20 Bay of Plenty. 45 Membership is at an all time high, and our activities continue to see the NZSA Heartland Bank AGM 21 Taranaki 46 Port of Tauranga AGM 22 Wellington 46 held in high regard across the corporate and regulatory world – even if they do The Warehouse Group AGM 22 Canterbury 46 not always agree with us. Members’ Issues Fletcher Building AGM 23 My thanks go to your hard working directors and committee members, my Hellaby Holdings AGM 24 A warning on Perpetuals 47 PGG Wrightson AGM 25 How good is your insurance cover? 47 EA Jacquie Spillane and all those who have assisted the Association in some Abano Healthcare Group AGM 26 ASA gains $A103,400 after German firm way or written to me with advice or words of encouragement. As always much fined for insider trading 48 Meridian Energy AGM 27 remains to be done. The Association is up for the challenge – I hope you will all Southport AGM 28 Upcoming Events 49 come along for the ride! Who Pays the Piper? Beacon Award Winner To everyone, enjoy the festive season, and as always, I hope that 2017 will ASA receives bring health, wealth and happiness to all. “gift” of $103,400 With best wishes, in Insider Trading John Hawkins, settlement ISSN 1179 -4275 Who pays the piper? On 14 July 1789, the French revolution is a lurch to the right, rising inflation began with the storming of the Bastille. Over and potentially a more interventionist the next five years, thousands, including the US foreign policy -which has its own King and Queen were executed as a whole risks, not just for the USA, but for the new order was established. A dictatorial whole world. bankrupt monarchy led to martial law under So, you may ask, what is the point of Napoleon, and ultimately a democratic this history lesson? Well, in each case republic. the trigger was significant inequality On October 25th 1917, the Bolsheviks between the ruling corporate, financial seized power in Russia and a short time and political elite and ordinary people. later, the whole royal family, including young In every case, those at the top enjoyed children, was summarily shot. A dictatorial, a life of massive excess, eye watering bankrupt monarchy became the world’s first incomes and manipulation of power to communist state. make sure the ordinary people paid up In Romania, a revolt against the corrupt, to maintain their life style. 24 year communist dictator, Nicholae In France and Russia, people were Ceausescu began on December 15th 1989. starving. In Romania, it is said that Ceausescu spent By December 24, Ceausescu and his wife were dead. more than 50% of the country’s GDP on his huge The country is now a democracy and member of NATO. “palace.” On June 23rd 2016, British voters elected, by some However, in Britain, the low paid, unemployed, “unedu- margin, to leave the European Economic Community in cated” and those in the neglected and rundown north a stunning “upset”. The outcome in macro-economic ensured Brexit passed. In the USA, the right wing terms remains uncertain, but inflation is sure to rise braggart Donald Trump was supported by a strong initially given the drop in the value of the pound. Britain turnout from poor, disadvantaged and ultra conserv- remains a constitutional monarchy -for the moment. ative groups, many of whom typically don’t bother The reality is that when On November 8th 2016, self-proclaimed billionaire voting. Perhaps they got to the point where they really Donald Trump was elected President of the United the mass of ordinary had nothing more to lose. It seems that the Occupy States, a role he will formally assume on January 20th people are pushed too far, Wall Street protests of a few years ago were indeed a forerunner of things to come – but Wall Street and the 2017. Despite some claims to the contrary, it seems they simply want change. certain that he will favour big business and the wealthy elite were deaf and blind. – his proposals to cut corporate and top tax rates and They don’t care what the The reality is that when the mass of ordinary people greatly alter the low cost “Obama care” health insurance future may hold. are pushed too far, they simply want change. They are hardly “ordinary worker” friendly. The expectation don’t care what the future may hold. They just want to The Scrip December 2016 2 get rid of the present situation, by force if necessary. their remuneration report – effectively a protest vote by The examples above have resulted in outcomes from the owners of the company, the shareholders. A high extreme left to extreme right and everything in between. profile example was CBA Bank where more than 50% In the most recent cases, it seems to me that the excesses of votes cast opposed the report – well in excess of of some multinational and large businesses have been the 25% threshold. This followed uproar over the “soft” a significant factor in people’s disillusionment. During Executives bonuses, were short term incentives proposed for the CBA CEO who the GFC, large investment banks such as Goldman downgraded to a mere is forced to struggle along on a minimum of $12m for Sachs got handouts and almost immediately reinstated 95% Meanwhile, share- the year. For the first time since 2012, executives did massive bonus payments to the very executives that not get 100% of bonuses, suffering a slap with a wet holders will fork out at had got them (and arguably the world) into the mess in bus ticket as these were downgraded to a mere 95% the first place. The sight of CEO’s turning up en masse least $105m to settle instead! Meanwhile, shareholders will fork out at least in their private jets to beg bailouts made headlines shady and downright $105m to settle shady and downright illegal dealings everywhere. The low taxes currently being paid by made by the bank’s management. illegal dealings made by large multinational companies across the world, mostly In our own back yard, A2 Milk recently held its AGM in the bank’s management. completely legally, are perceived as massively unfair by Sydney. 28% of votes opposed a huge hike in director workers who are socked for 20% or 30% or even 40% fees. There is no doubt that A2 has done well in the last on every dollar they earn. 3 years following a long gestation where performance The most recent data shows that over the past 40 was poor. The directors claimed that the proposal was in years, CEO’s in the USA have gone from a ratio of 20x line with the “internationally benchmarked” recommen- average worker pay to 300x, in Europe about 200x and dations of the London based consultants they appointed Australia about 100x, often with little improvement in and paid. Had they published this document or the performance over time. Locally we see ratios of perhaps executive summary as some companies are beginning 30x. to do, all would have been transparent. But they didn’t. In the UK, PM Theresa May has openly warned that legal A2 has set its base directors fees at 73% of the Fonterra action to stop Brexit will test politicians “who should not director fees, and its committee Chair fees at 90% resist the will of the people.” She will also force firms In our own back yard, of Fonterra’s. To put this into perspective, A2 which to publish the ratio between the pay of chief execu- does not even manufacture its own products (Synlait A2 Milk recently held its tives and ordinary workers to stem the increases in “fat does), had revenue in 2016 of $352m and sold in four cat” pay. And a ceiling equivalent to $NZ128, 000 has AGM in Sydney. 28% of markets –mostly in Australasia. In 2015, the fully verti- been placed on government advisor roles.
Recommended publications
  • First Anniversary Snapshot 2018/2019 Our Signatories
    First Anniversary Snapshot 2018/2019 Our signatories Founding signatories Original signatories from public launch in July 2018 First Anniversary Snapshot 2018/2019 New signatories since launch Climate Leaders Coalition Signatory footprint Our signatories Make up nearly Represent 60% Employ more than of NZ’s gross emissions one third of NZ’s 170,000 people private sector GDP 60% “Until joining the Climate Leaders Coalition it was somewhat lonely out there and we were very isolated from other companies’ initiatives around climate change. This initiative has created a family who are very willing to share experiences and provide advice and support. This has made our journey a lot easier.” Tony Gibson, CEO Ports of Auckland 1 First Anniversary Snapshot 2018/2019 Contents 3 A word from our convenor 4 Year in review 8 Climate-X 9 Demonstrating leadership on climate change 10 Events 11 Signatories’ progress against the 2017 Climate Change Statement 14 2019 Statement 15 Join the movement “The vision of Ngāi Tahu is mō tātou, ā, mō kā uri ā muri ake nei – for us and our children after us. The action now required by all of us to address climate change comes in to sharp focus when we consider the effects on those who will follow in our footsteps.” Mike Sang, CEO Ngāi Tahu Holdings Climate Leaders Coalition 2 A word from our convenor Back in 2017 the idea was hatched to create a coalition of New Zealand To show the Coalition means business, we have also released a second pledge businesses who were taking action on climate change to inspire others to do the to reflect the latest science that illustrates the need to limit global warming to same.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Business Number Bill 18 June 2015
    Submission to the Commerce Select Committee on the New Zealand Business Number Bill 18 June 2015 NEW ZEALAND BANKERS ASSOCIATION Level 15, 80 The Terrace, PO Box 3043, Wellington 6140, New Zealand TELEPHONE +64 4 802 3358 FACSIMILE +64 4 473 1698 EMAIL [email protected] WEB www.nzba.org.nz Submission by the New Zealand Bankers’ Association to the Commerce Select Committee on the New Zealand Business Number Bill About NZBA 1. NZBA works on behalf of the New Zealand banking industry in conjunction with its member banks. NZBA develops and promotes policy outcomes which contribute to a strong and stable banking system that benefits New Zealanders and the New Zealand economy. 2. The following fifteen registered banks in New Zealand are members of NZBA: ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited ASB Bank Limited Bank of China (NZ) Limited Bank of New Zealand Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, UFJ Citibank, N.A. The Co-operative Bank Limited Heartland Bank Limited The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Kiwibank Limited Rabobank New Zealand Limited SBS Bank TSB Bank Limited Westpac New Zealand Limited. Background 3. NZBA is grateful for the opportunity to submit on the New Zealand Business Number Bill, bill number 15-1 (the Bill). 4. NZBA would appreciate the opportunity to make an oral submission to the Committee on this Bill. 5. If the Committee or officials have any questions about this submission, or would like to discuss any aspect of the submission further, please contact: Kirk Hope Chief Executive 04 802 3355 / 027 475 0442 [email protected] 2 General NZBA fully supports the New Zealand Business Number (NZBN) initiative which will significantly help businesses to liaise with Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Rakon Letterhead NZ Dec 2014
    27 May 2021 5G momentum drives Rakon’s growth Revenue $128.3 million, 8% higher than FY2020 Underlying EBITDA1 $23.5 million, 59% higher than FY2020 Net profit after tax $9.6 million, 142% higher than FY2020 Rapid response and ongoing adaption through worldwide Covid-19 disruptions Sustained growth in Telecommunications revenue, driven by increased 5G momentum Market opportunities captured through agility and strong supply chain relationships FY2022 guidance confirmed of Underlying EBITDA range of $27-32 million All amounts are in New Zealand Dollars Rakon (NZX.RAK) today announced strong improvements in revenue and earnings for the year to 31 March 2021, as sustained demand from the global telecommunications sector for its industry-leading frequency control and timing solutions helped to offset the significant disruptions of the Covid-19 pandemic. Revenue for the year to 31 March 2021 rose 8% to $128.3 million from $119.0 million a year earlier. Gross margin improvements and careful cost management drove a 59% increase in underlying EBITDA to $23.5 million (2020: $14.8m), ahead of the company’s guidance of $20-22 million. Net profit after tax rose 142% to $9.6 million from $4.0 million in the same period a year ago. Rakon Chair Bruce Irvine said the company’s FY2021 performance was a testament to the capability, resilience and commitment of Rakon’s global team, and the agility and responsiveness of the business. “It has been a particularly challenging year. Rakon’s strong performance through these challenges reflects the sustained demand for its industry-leading products and builds on the solid operating improvements made in recent years.” Managing Director Brent Robinson said: “This result has been achieved despite the considerable disruptions of the Covid-19 pandemic, and it demonstrates our position as the supplier of choice in high-reliability connectivity solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only Use Personal for for Personal Use Only Use Personal For
    NZX/ASX Release Heartland publishes Annual Report and Notice of Meeting 30 October 2020 Heartland Group Holdings Limited (Heartland) (NZX/ASX: HGH) has today published its Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2020 and the Notice of Meeting for its 2020 Annual Meeting. Annual Report Heartland is pleased to release its Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2020. The Annual Report is being sent to shareholders today. A copy is attached to this announcement. Annual Meeting Heartland’s Annual Meeting will be held on Monday 30 November 2020 at the South Lounge, Eden Park, Reimers Avenue, Kingsland, Auckland commencing at 2pm (NZST). The Notice of Meeting and Voting/Proxy Form are being sent to shareholders today. Copies of these documents are attached to this announcement. - Ends - For further information, please contact the person who authorised this announcement: Andrew Dixson Chief Financial Officer DDI: 09 927 9274 E: [email protected] Address: Level 3, Heartland House 35 Teed Street Newmarket, Auckland New Zealand For personal use only For personal use only 2020 ANNUAL REPORT OUR YEAR IN REVIEW P. 2 Chair’s Report P. 6 Chief Executive Officer’s Report P. 10 Na te kaiwhakahaere matua P. 14 2020 Results at a Glance COVID-19 P. 16 Our Response to COVID-19 P. 20 Reverse Mortgages and COVID-19 WHO WE ARE P. 22 Our Business P. 24 Our Directors P. 28 Our Leadership Team P. 30 Diversity Report P. 38 Corporate Governance P. 50 Directors’ Disclosures OUR SUSTAINABILITY JOURNEY P. 60 Sustainability Framework P.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Institutions Performance Survey FIPS Review of 2017
    Financial Institutions Performance Survey FIPS Review of 2017 1 3.68% 7.35% escalation in growth in NPAT operating expenses 8 2 3.94% 3 1.17% rise in net decrease in provisions interest income 9 bps 4 4.68% decline in net increase in interest margins gross lending 7 5 7.30% 6 40 bps drop in gross drop in average impaired assets funding costs Contents 2 The Survey 4 A KPMG view from the editor KPMG’s Financial Services team provides 6 Industry overview 16 Timeline of events focused and practical audit, tax and advisory 20 Some of the significant management changes in the sector services to the insurance, retail banking, 22 Sector performance 30 Analysis of annual results corporate and investment banking, and 38 Major banks – Quarterly analysis 42 Getting practical with blockchain investment management sectors. 46 Conduct, robo-advice and good client outcomes 50 Revolutionising the banking eco-system 54 Getting past compliance crisis management Our professionals have an in-depth 60 Customer friction – reducing through emerging trends in Fintech innovation understanding of the key issues 64 RBNZ: Modernising disclosures with Bank Financial Strength Dashboard facing financial institutions. 66 FMA: Show us better outcomes for your customers 68 NZBA: Code of Banking Practice breaks new ground Our team is led by senior partners with a 70 Massey: Banking industry forecasts 74 Ownership and credit ratings wealth of client experience and relationships 75 Descriptions of the credit rating grades 76 Definitions with many of the market players, regulators 77 KPMG’s Financial Services Team 78 Contact us and leading industry bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Investor Day
    2021 Investor Day The Warehouse Group 4 May 2021 Important Disclaimer This presentation is given on behalf of The Warehouse Group Limited (‘the Group’). Information in this presentation: • Is for general information purposes only, and is not an offer or invitation for subscription, purchase, or recommendation of securities in the Group. Readers should take their own independent professional advice in respect of their objectives, financial position or needs; • Should be read in conjunction with, and is subject to, the Group’s Annual Report, market releases, and information published on The Warehouse Group website (www.thewarehousegroup.co.nz); • Includes forward-looking statements about the Group and the environment in which the Group operates, which are subject to uncertainties and contingencies outside of the Group’s control – the Group’s actual results or performance may differ materially from these statements; • Includes statements relating to past performance, which should not be regarded as a reliable indicator of future performance; • May contain information from third parties believed to be reliable; however, no representations or warranties are made as to the accuracy or completeness of such information; and • Has not been subject to audit or review by an independent third party of the assumptions, data, calculations and forecasts contained in or referred to in this presentation. All information in this presentation is current at the date of this presentation, unless otherwise stated. All currency amounts are in NZ dollars unless
    [Show full text]
  • The Climate Risk of New Zealand Equities
    The Climate Risk of New Zealand Equities Hamish Kennett Ivan Diaz-Rainey Pallab Biswas Introduction/Overview ØExamine the Climate Risk exposure of New Zealand Equities, specifically NZX50 companies ØMeasuring company Transition Risk through collating firm emission data ØCompany Survey and Emission Descriptives ØPredicting Emission Disclosure ØHypothetical Carbon Liabilities 2 Measuring Transition Risk ØTransition Risk through collating firm emissions ØAimed to collate emissions for all the constituents of the NZX50. ØUnique as our dataset consists of Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions, ESG scores and Emission Intensities for each firm. ØCarbon Disclosure Project (CDP) reports, Thomson Reuters Asset4, Annual reports, Sustainability reports and Certified Emissions Measurement and Reduction Scheme (CEMAR) reports. Ø86% of the market capitilisation of the NZX50. 9 ØScope 1: Classified as direct GHG emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the company. ØScope 2: Classified as indirect emissions occurring from the generation of purchased electricity. ØScope 3: Classified as other indirect GHG emissions occurring from the activities of the company, but not from sources owned or controlled by the company. (-./01 23-./014) Ø Emission Intensity = 6789 :1;1<=1 4 Company Survey Responses Did not Email No Response to Email Responded to Email Response Company Company Company Air New Zealand Ltd. The a2 Milk Company Ltd. Arvida Group Ltd. Do not report ANZ Group Ltd. EBOS Ltd. Heartland Group Holdings Ltd. Do not report Argosy Property Ltd. Goodman Property Ltd. Metro Performance Glass Ltd. Do not report Chorus Ltd. Infratil Ltd. Pushpay Holdings Ltd. Do not report Contact Energy Ltd. Investore Property Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • FNZ Basket 14102010
    14-Oct-10 smartFONZ Basket Composition Composition of a basket of securities and cash equivalent to 200,000 NZX 50 Portfolio Index Fund units effective from 14 October 2010 The new basket composition applies to applications and withdrawals. Cash Portion: $ 1,902.98 Code Security description Shares ABA Abano Healthcare Group Limited 88 AIA Auckland International Airport Limited Ordinary Shares 6,725 AIR Air New Zealand Limited (NS) Ordinary Shares 2,784 AMP AMP Limited Ordinary Shares 432 ANZ Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Ord Shares 212 APN APN News & Media Limited Ordinary Shares 1,759 APT AMP NZ Office Trust Ordinary Units 8,453 ARG Argosy Property Trust Ordinary Units 4,344 CAV Cavalier Corporation Limited Ordinary Shares 482 CEN Contact Energy Limited Ordinary Shares 1,508 EBO Ebos Group Limited Ordinary Shares 537 FBU Fletcher Building Limited Ordinary Shares 1,671 FPA Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares 6,128 FPH Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited Ord Shares 3,106 FRE Freightways Limited Ordinary Shares 1,625 GFF Goodman Fielder Limited Ordinary Shares 3,990 GMT Macquarie Goodman Property Trust Ordinary Units 8,004 GPG Guinness Peat Group Plc Ordinary Shares 15,588 HLG Hallenstein Glasson Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares 430 IFT Infratil Limited Ordinary Shares 6,363 KIP Kiwi Income Property Trust Ordinary Units 10,287 KMD Kathmandu Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares 690 MFT Mainfreight Limited Ordinary Shares 853 MHI Michael Hill International Limited Ordinary Shares 1,433 NPX
    [Show full text]
  • HALF YEAR REPORT 2012 Overview Overview
    The Warehouse Group Limited HALF YEAR REPORT 2012 Overview Overview Group OPERATING PERFORMANCE GROUP OPERATING PROFIT $ 67. 9 GROUP SALES UP million 3.3% GROUP OPERATING MARGIN $937.9 MILLION TAX-PAID PROFIT UP 7. 2% 3.3% Group EBIT $54.0 MILLION $76.7 million OVERVIEW 01 Half Year Review 2012 Your Directors are pleased to present the unaudited results for the six months ended 29 January 2012. The strategic direction set out in September 2011 has already started to have a positive impact and we are very pleased to have been able to declare a dividend of 13.5 cents per share. Dear Shareholders SEGMENTAL RESULTS The Warehouse Group Limited (‘Group’) reported a half The Warehouse year net profit after tax of $54.0 million compared to The Warehouse reported a 3.4% increase in sales for $52.3 million in the prior comparable period. Adjusted the half year ended 29 January 2012, with same store net profit after tax for the period was $46.7 million, sales up 2.7%. Operating profit was down 16.1% to compared to $53.0 million last year. $62.1 million, primarily a function of margin pressure The strategic direction set out last September has in apparel, cost inflation and cost investment to provide already started to have a positive impact. Your Board a stable base for the future. understands that the scale of change required to The Warehouse’s operating margin was 7.4% compared reverse long term trends is significant and building to last year, at 9.2%. long term sustainable growth in profits will take time.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Productivity Commission Regulatory Institutions & Practices
    Submission to the Productivity Commission on the Regulatory Institutions & Practices Issues Paper 31 October 2013 NEW ZEALAND BANKERS ASSOCIATION Level 15, 80 The Terrace, PO Box 3043, Wellington 6140, New Zealand TELEPHONE +64 4 802 3358 FACSIMILE +64 4 473 1698 EMAIL [email protected] WEB www.nzba.org.nz Submission by the New Zealand Bankers’ Association to the Productivity Commission on the Regulatory Institutions and Practices Issues Paper About NZBA 1. NZBA works on behalf of the New Zealand banking industry in conjunction with its member banks. NZBA develops and promotes policy outcomes which contribute to a safe and successful banking system that benefits New Zealanders and the New Zealand economy. 2. The following fourteen registered banks in New Zealand are members of NZBA: ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited ASB Bank Limited Bank of New Zealand Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, UFJ Citibank, N.A. The Co-operative Bank Limited Heartland Bank Limited The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Kiwibank Limited Rabobank New Zealand Limited SBS Bank TSB Bank Limited, and Westpac New Zealand Limited. If you have any questions about this submission, or would like to discuss any aspect of it further, please contact: Kirk Hope Chief Executive Telephone: +64 4 802 3355/ +64 27 475 0442 Email: [email protected] 2 Executive Summary 3. NZBA welcomes the decision by the Productivity Commission to undertake an inquiry into regulatory institutions and practices. 4. NZBA submits that quality regulation is essential to an efficient and well-functioning economy. Poorly conceived and implemented regulation can significantly hinder innovation, productivity and ultimately economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Disclosure of Beginning to Have Substantial Holding
    Disclosure of beginning to have substantial holding Section 276, Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 To NZX Limited and To The Warehouse Group Limited (WHS) Date this disclosure made: 21 May 2021 Date on which substantial holding began: 21 May 2021 Substantial product holder(s) giving disclosure Full name(s): Forsyth Barr Limited (FBL), Forsyth Barr Group Limited (FBGL), Forsyth Barr Investment Management Limited (FBIM) Summary of substantial holding Class of quoted voting products: Ordinary shares (WHS) Summary for FBL, FBGL, FBIM For this disclosure,— (a) total number held in class: 31,610,858 (b) total in class: 346,843,120 (c) total percentage held in class: 9.113% Details of relevant interests Details for FBL and FBGL Nature of relevant interest(s): The relevant interest is the power to acquire and dispose of, or control the acquisition or disposition of, 31,120,089 shares in WHS. This relevant interest was acquired when FBL and FBGL entered into a block trade agreement on 21 May 2021 with Foodstuffs (Auckland) Nominees Limited, Wardell Bros & Coy Limited and Cash Wholesalers Limited (Block Trade Agreement). A relevant agreement document is attached under regulation 139 (see pages 4-22). For that relevant interest,— (a) number held in class: 31,120,089 (b) percentage held in class: 8.972% (c) current registered holder(s): Foodstuffs (Auckland) Nominees Limited (10,373,363 shares), Wardell Bros & Coy Limited (10,373,363 shares), Cash Wholesalers Limited (10,373,363). (d) registered holder(s) once transfers are registered: unknown 1 Details for FBIM Nature of relevant interest: The relevant interest arises under various investment management agreements to which FBIM is a party in its capacity as the manager of the Forsyth Barr Investment Funds and as a provider of discretionary investment management services (DIMS).
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Most Active Banking Professionals on Social
    Oceania's Most Active Banking Professionals on Social - February 2021 Industry at a glance: Why should you care? So, where does your company rank? Position Company Name LinkedIn URL Location Employees on LinkedIn No. Employees Shared (Last 30 Days) % Shared (Last 30 Days) Rank Change 1 Teachers Mutual Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/285023Australia 451 34 7.54% ▲ 4 2 P&N Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2993310Australia 246 18 7.32% ▲ 8 3 Reserve Bank of New Zealand https://www.linkedin.com/company/691462New Zealand 401 29 7.23% ▲ 9 4 Heritage Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/68461Australia 640 46 7.19% ▲ 9 5 Bendigo Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/10851946Australia 609 34 5.58% ▼ -4 6 Westpac Institutional Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2731362Australia 1,403 73 5.20% ▲ 16 7 Kiwibank https://www.linkedin.com/company/8730New Zealand 1,658 84 5.07% ▲ 10 8 Greater Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/1111921Australia 621 31 4.99% ▲ 0 9 Heartland Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/2791687New Zealand 362 18 4.97% ▼ -6 10 ME Bank https://www.linkedin.com/company/927944Australia 1,241 61 4.92% ▲ 1 11 Beyond Bank Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/141977Australia 468 22 4.70% ▼ -2 12 Bank of New Zealand https://www.linkedin.com/company/7841New Zealand 4,733 216 4.56% ▼ -10 13 ING Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/387202Australia 1,319 59 4.47% ▲ 16 14 Credit Union Australia https://www.linkedin.com/company/784868Australia 952 42 4.41% ▼ -7 15 Westpac https://www.linkedin.com/company/3597Australia
    [Show full text]