DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of Quasi-Optical Components for Far-Infrared Astronomy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of Quasi-Optical Components for Far-Infrared Astronomy Analysis of Quasi-Optical Components for Far-Infrared Astronomy Presented by Paul Kelly, B.Sc. A thesis submitted for Degree of Master of Science Department of Experimental Physics NUI Maynooth Co. Kildare Ireland May 2014 Head of Department Professor J. A. Murphy Research Supervisor Dr. Créidhe O'Sullivan Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................ i Abstract ....................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... vi Chapter 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction to Terahertz / Submillimetre Astronomy ........................................... 1 1.2 The Big Bang and the CMB ................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 The Big Bang ........................................................................................ 4 1.2.2 The Cosmic Microwave Background .................................................... 5 1.2.3 Temperature Anisotropies in the CMB ................................................. 6 1.2.4 CMB Polarization ................................................................................ 10 1.2.5 CMB Instrument Types ....................................................................... 13 1.2.6 CMB Experiments ............................................................................... 15 1.3 Other Terahertz Applications ............................................................................... 18 1.4 Summary and Thesis Outline ............................................................................... 21 Chapter 2 Techniques For Modelling Horn Antennas ......................................... 22 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Waveguides .......................................................................................................... 22 2.2.1 Solutions to Maxwell's Equations in Waveguides .............................. 22 2.2.2 Rectangular Waveguides ..................................................................... 28 2.2.3 Cylindrical Waveguides ...................................................................... 32 i 2.3 Corrugated Horns ................................................................................................. 41 2.4 CST Studio Suite .................................................................................................. 44 2.4.1 CST Solver .......................................................................................... 47 2.4.2 CST Setup ........................................................................................... 48 2.4.3 Advantages & Disadvantages.............................................................. 50 2.5 Scatter Matrix Method .......................................................................................... 51 Advantages & Disadvantages....................................................................... 53 2.6 Far-Field Beam Patterns ....................................................................................... 54 2.7 Summary .............................................................................................................. 55 Chapter 3 Improvements to Scatter ....................................................................... 56 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 56 3.2 Specification of horn geometries for Scatter ........................................................ 56 3.3 Matrix Inversion ................................................................................................... 57 3.4 The Pseudoinverse ................................................................................................ 58 3.4.1 Calculating the Pseudoinverse of a Matrix in C .................................. 60 3.5 Examples Utilizing the Pseudoinverse Code ........................................................ 67 3.5.1 The 857-GHz Planck Horn .................................................................. 67 3.5.2 Small Gaps in Platelet Horns .............................................................. 68 3.6 Summary .............................................................................................................. 69 Chapter 4 Analysis of Platelet Horn Arrays for QUBIC ...................................... 71 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 71 4.2 QUBIC .................................................................................................................. 71 ii 4.2.1 Instrumental Set Up ............................................................................. 72 4.3 Platelet Formed horns ........................................................................................... 74 4.3.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Platelet Feed Horn Arrays ............ 75 4.3.2 Adding a Thick Plate for Stability....................................................... 75 4.3.3 Adding a Thick Plate (simulations with CST) .................................... 77 4.3.4 Adding a Thick Plate (simulations with CST) .................................... 79 4.3.5 Experimental results ............................................................................ 81 4.3.6 Gaps between platelets ........................................................................ 88 4.3.7 Random Variations to Corrugations .................................................... 92 4.4 Summary .............................................................................................................. 96 Chapter 5 Analysis of Electroformed Corrugated Horns for the Planck Telescope ................................................................................................................... 98 5.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 98 5.2 Planck ................................................................................................................... 98 5.2.1 Instrumental set up .............................................................................. 98 5.3 Electroformed Horns .......................................................................................... 100 5.4 Analysis of Electroformed Horns ....................................................................... 101 5.4.1 Filled Corrugated Horn ..................................................................... 102 5.4.2 Damaged Corrugated Horn ............................................................... 113 5.4.3 Comparison between Filled and Damaged Horn .............................. 122 5.4.4 Partially Filled Corrugated Horn ....................................................... 124 5.4.5 Partially Damaged Corrugated Horn ................................................. 128 iii 5.5 Summary ............................................................................................................ 130 Chapter 6 Conclusions ........................................................................................... 132 6.1 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 132 6.2 Author’s Contribution ........................................................................................ 136 Works Cited ............................................................................................................ 138 Appendix A ............................................................................................................. 144 Appendix B .............................................................................................................. 147 iv Abstract This thesis is concerned with the development and analysis of quasi-optical components used in experiments to measure of the CMB in the terahertz and submillimetre wavebands. I have concentrated on corrugated horn structures in the Planck and QUBIC experiments. A precise analysis of the electromagnetic and optical performance of such instruments is required if they are to reach the sensitivity goals required. The analysis of these components was done through computer simulations and experimentation. There were a number of techniques used to model the horns. These techniques were implemented in NUI Maynooth's in-house simulation code 'Scatter' and a commercial software package known as CST. They were used to predict the beam pattern of corrugated horns including the effects of likely manufacturing errors. NUI Maynooth's Vector Network Analyser was used to confirm the results obtained by the simulations. The results in this thesis show that variations in corrugated horn made with the efectroforming technique could result in significant degraded performance but that small gaps between the metal sheets in platelet arrays are acceptable. v Acknowledgements First of all I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Créidhe O’Sullivan for her advice and commitment throughout this masters project, for always being helpful and patient, and for providing me with the opportunity to perform this research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis and Measurement of Horn Antennas for CMB Experiments
    Analysis and Measurement of Horn Antennas for CMB Experiments Ian Mc Auley (M.Sc. B.Sc.) A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Maynooth University Department of Experimental Physics, Maynooth University, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland. October 2015 Head of Department Professor J.A. Murphy Research Supervisor Professor J.A. Murphy Abstract In this thesis the author's work on the computational modelling and the experimental measurement of millimetre and sub-millimetre wave horn antennas for Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments is presented. This computational work particularly concerns the analysis of the multimode channels of the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) of the European Space Agency (ESA) Planck satellite using mode matching techniques to model their farfield beam patterns. To undertake this analysis the existing in-house software was upgraded to address issues associated with the stability of the simulations and to introduce additional functionality through the application of Single Value Decomposition in order to recover the true hybrid eigenfields for complex corrugated waveguide and horn structures. The farfield beam patterns of the two highest frequency channels of HFI (857 GHz and 545 GHz) were computed at a large number of spot frequencies across their operational bands in order to extract the broadband beams. The attributes of the multimode nature of these channels are discussed including the number of propagating modes as a function of frequency. A detailed analysis of the possible effects of manufacturing tolerances of the long corrugated triple horn structures on the farfield beam patterns of the 857 GHz horn antennas is described in the context of the higher than expected sidelobe levels detected in some of the 857 GHz channels during flight.
    [Show full text]
  • ELIA STEFANO BATTISTELLI Curriculum Vitae
    ELIA STEFANO BATTISTELLI Curriculum Vitae Place: Rome, Italy Date: 03/09/2019 Part I – General Information Full Name ELIA STEFANO BATTISTELLI Date of Birth 29/03/1973 Place of Birth Milan, Italy Citizenship Italian Work Address Physics Dep., Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy Work Phone Number +39 06 49914462 Home Address Via Romolo Gigliozzi, 173, scala B, 00128, Rome, Italy Mobile Phone Number +39 349 6592825 E-mail [email protected] Spoken Languages Italian (native), English (fluent), Spanish (fluent), French (basic) Part II – Education Type Year Institution Notes (Degree, Experience,..) University graduation 1999 Sapienza University (RM, IT) Physics 1996 University of Leeds, UK Erasmus project Post-graduate studies 2000 SIGRAV (CO, IT) Graduate School in Relativity 2000 INAF (Asiago, VI, IT) Scuola Nazionale Astrofisica 2001 INAF/INFN (FC, IT) Scuola Nazionale Astroparticelle 2004 Società Italiana Fisica (CO, IT) International Fermi School 2006 Princeton University (NJ,USA) Summer School on Gal. Cluster PhD 2004 Sapienza University (RM, IT) PhD in Astronomy (XV cycle) Training Courses 2007 University of British Columbia 40-hours course in precision (BC, CA) machining 2009 Programma Nazionale Ricerche 2 weeks training course for the in Antartide (PNRA) Antarctic activity in remote camps Qualification 2013 Ministero della Pubblica National scientific qualification for Istruzione Associate Professor 2012, SSD 02/C1 (ASN-2012) Part III – Appointments IIIA – Academic Appointments Start End Institution Position 11/2018 present Sapienza University of Rome, Physics Associate Professor;Physics Department Department (Rome, Italy) SSD 02/C1-FIS/05 (Astrophysics) 11/2015 11/2018 Sapienza University of Rome, Physics Tenure track assistant professor Department (Rome, Italy) (Ricercatore a Tempo Determinato RTD- B-type).
    [Show full text]
  • Clover: Measuring Gravitational-Waves from Inflation
    ClOVER: Measuring gravitational-waves from Inflation Executive Summary The existence of primordial gravitational waves in the Universe is a fundamental prediction of the inflationary cosmological paradigm, and determination of the level of this tensor contribution to primordial fluctuations is a uniquely powerful test of inflationary models. We propose an experiment called ClOVER (ClObserVER) to measure this tensor contribution via its effect on the geometric properties (the so-called B-mode) of the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) down to a sensitivity limited by the foreground contamination due to lensing. In order to achieve this sensitivity ClOVER is designed with an unprecedented degree of systematic control, and will be deployed in Antarctica. The experiment will consist of three independent telescopes, operating at 90, 150 or 220 GHz respectively, and each of which consists of four separate optical assemblies feeding feedhorn arrays arrays of superconducting detectors with phase as well as intensity modulation allowing the measurement of all three Stokes parameters I, Q and U in every pixel. This project is a combination of the extensive technical expertise and experience of CMB measurements in the Cardiff Instrumentation Group (Gear) and Cavendish Astrophysics Group (Lasenby) in UK, the Rome “La Sapienza” (de Bernardis and Masi) and Milan “Bicocca” (Sironi) CMB groups in Italy, and the Paris College de France Cosmology group (Giraud-Heraud) in France. This document is based on the proposal submitted to PPARC by the UK groups (and funded with 4.6ML), integrated with additional information on the Dome-C site selected for the operations. This document has been prepared to obtain an endorsement from the INAF (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica) on the scientific quality of the proposed experiment to be operated in the Italian-French base of Dome-C, and to be submitted to the Commissione Scientifica Nazionale Antartica and to the French INSU and IPEV.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for the Missing Baryons in Clusters
    Searching for the missing baryons in clusters Bilhuda Rasheed, Neta Bahcall1, and Paul Bode Department of Astrophysical Sciences, 4 Ivy Lane, Peyton Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Edited by Marc Davis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved January 10, 2011 (received for review July 8, 2010) Observations of clusters of galaxies suggest that they contain few- fraction in the richest clusters, it is still systematically below er baryons (gas plus stars) than the cosmic baryon fraction. This the cosmic value. This baryon discrepancy, especially the gas frac- “missing baryon” puzzle is especially surprising for the most mas- tion, is observed to increase with decreasing cluster mass (14, 15). sive clusters, which are expected to be representative of the cosmic This raises the questions: Where are the missing baryons? Why matter content of the universe (baryons and dark matter). Here we are they “missing”? show that the baryons may not actually be missing from clusters, Attempted explanations for the missing baryons in clusters but rather are extended to larger radii than typically observed. The range from preheating or other energy inputs that expel gas from baryon deficiency is typically observed in the central regions of the system (16–22, and references therein), to the suggestion of clusters (∼0.5 the virial radius). However, the observed gas-density additional baryonic components not yet detected [e.g., cool gas, profile is significantly shallower than the mass-density profile, faint stars (10, 23)]. Simulations, which do suggest a depletion of implying that the gas is more extended than the mass and that cluster gas in the inner regions of clusters, do not yet contain all the gas fraction increases with radius.
    [Show full text]
  • Calibration of a Polarimetric Microwave Radiometer Using a Double Directional Coupler
    remote sensing Article Calibration of a Polarimetric Microwave Radiometer Using a Double Directional Coupler Luisa de la Fuente 1,* , Beatriz Aja 1 , Enrique Villa 2 and Eduardo Artal 1 1 Departamento de Ingeniería de Comunicaciones, Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain; [email protected] (B.A.); [email protected] (E.A.) 2 IACTEC, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, 38205 La Laguna, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents a built-in calibration procedure of a 10-to-20 GHz polarimeter aimed at measuring the I, Q, U Stokes parameters of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. A full-band square waveguide double directional coupler, mounted in the antenna-feed system, is used to inject differently polarized reference waves. A brief description of the polarimetric microwave radiometer and the system calibration injector is also reported. A fully polarimetric calibration is also possible using the designed double directional coupler, although the presented calibration method in this paper is proposed to obtain three of the four Stokes parameters with the introduced microwave receiver, since V parameter is expected to be zero for the CMB radiation. Experimental results are presented for linearly polarized input waves in order to validate the built-in calibration system. Keywords: radiometer; polarimeter calibration; microwave polarimeter; radiometer calibration; radio astronomy receiver; cosmic microwave background receiver; Stokes parameters Citation: de la Fuente, L.; Aja, B.; Villa, E.; Artal, E. Calibration of a 1. Introduction Polarimetric Microwave Radiometer Remote sensing applications employ sensitive instruments to fulfill the scientific goals Using a Double Directional Coupler. of dedicated missions or projects, either space or terrestrial.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Microwave Background Activities at IN2P3
    Cosmic Microwave Background activities at IN2P3 IN2P3 permanent researchers and research engineers APC: James G. Bartlett (Pr.-UPD – Planck), Pierre Binétruy (Pr.-UPD), Martin Bucher (DR2-CNRS – Planck), Jacques Delabrouille (DR2-CNRS – Planck), Ken Ganga (DR1-CNRS – Planck), Yannick Giraud- Héraud (DR1-CNRS - Planck/QUBIC), Laurent Grandsire (IR-CNRS – QUBIC), Jean-Christophe Hamilton (DR2-CNRS – QUBIC), Jean Kaplan (DR émérite-CNRS – Planck/QUBIC), Maude Le Jeune (IR-CNRS – Planck/POLARBEAR), Guillaume Patanchon (MCF-UPD – Planck), Michel Piat (Pr-UPD - Planck/QUBIC), Damien Prêle (IR-CNRS - QUBIC), Cayetano Santos (IR-CNRS, R&D mm), Radek Stompor (DR1-CNRS – Planck/POLARBEAR), Bartjan van Tent (MCF-UPS – Planck), Fabrice Voisin (IR-CNRS – QUBIC/R&D mm); CSNSM: Laurent Bergé (IR-CNRS – QUBIC/R&D mm), Louis Dumoulin (DR émérite-CNRS – QUBIC/R&D mm), Stefanos Marnieros (CR-CNRS – QUBIC/R&D mm); LAL: François Couchot (DR1- CNRS – Planck/QUBIC), Sophie Henrot-Versillé (CR1-CNRS – Planck/QUBIC), Olivier Perdereau (DR2- CNRS – Planck/QUBIC), Stéphane Plaszczynski (DR2-CNRS – Planck/QUBIC), Matthieu Tristram (CR1- CNRS – Planck/QUBIC); LPSC: Olivier Bourrion (IR1-CNRS – NIKA/NIKA2), Andrea Catalano (CR2-CNRS – Planck/NIKA/NIKA2), Céline Combet (CR2-CNRS – Planck), Juan Francisco Macías-Perez (DR2-CNRS – Planck/NIKA/NIKA2), Frédéric Mayet (MCF-UJF – NIKA/NIKA2), Laurence Perotto (CR1-CNRS – Planck/NIKA/NIKA2), Cécile Renault (CR1-CNRS – Planck), Daniel Santos (DR1-CNRS – Planck) IN2P3 Postdoctoral fellows and PhD students APC: Ranajoy Banerji
    [Show full text]
  • The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (Act): Beam Profiles and First Sz Cluster Maps
    ApJS, 191 :423-438, 20 I 0 DECEMBER Preprint typeset using ""TEX style emulateapj v. 11/10/09 THE ATACAMA COSMOLOGY TELESCOPE (ACT): BEAM PROFILES AND FIRST SZ CLUSTER MAPS A, D, HINCKS I, V, ACQUAVIVA 2,3, p, A, R, ADE4, p, AGUIRRES, M, AMIRI6, J, W, ApPEL I, L. F, BARRIENTOS5, E, S, BATTISTELU7,6, 9 6 IO I I2 12 13 J, R, BONDs, B, BROWN , B, BURGER , 1. CHERVENAK , S, DAS I.I.3, M, J. DEVLIN , S. R. DICKER , W, B, DORIESE , I4 1 3 5 I I s 6 J. DUNKLEy . , R. DONNER , T. ESSINGER-HILEMAN , R. P. FISHER , J. W. FOWLER I , A. HAJIAN ,3.1, M. HALPERN , 6 I5 13 I6 17 I4 I8 M. HASSELFIELD , C, HERNANDEZ-MONTEAGUDO , G, C. HILTON , M. HILTON . , R. HLOZEK , K, M. HUFFENBERGER , I9 2 5 I3 20 5 I2 I2 D. H. HUGHES , J. P. HUGHES , L. INFANTE , K. D. IRWIN , R, JIMENEZ , J. B. JUIN , M. KAUL , J. KLEIN , A. KOSOWSKy9, 23 12 24 3 25 3 I2 26 4 J. M, LAU21.22.1 , M, LIMON . ,! , Y-T. LIN . .5, R, H. LUPTON), T. A. MARRIAGE . , D. MARSDEN , K, MARTOCCI ), p, MAUSKOPF , 2 27 8 F. MENANTEAU , K. MOODLEyI6.I7, H. MOSELEYIO, C. B. NETTERFIELD , M. D. NIEMACK 13.1, M. R. NOLTA , L, A. PAGE I, I 28 5 20 1 21 8 I L. PARKER , B. PARTRIDGE , H, QUINTANA , B. REID . , N. SEHGAL , J. SIEVERS , D. N. SPERGEL 3, S. T. STAGGS , 0. STRYZAK I, I2 13 26 I2 29 30 20 I6 31 D.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR the QUBIC CMB David G. Bennett B.Sc
    ___________________________________________________ DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A QUASI-OPTICAL BEAM COMBINER FOR THE QUBIC CMB INTERFEROMETER ___________________________________________________ David G. Bennett B.Sc. Research Supervisor: Dr. Créidhe O'Sullivan Head of Department: Prof. J.A. Murphy A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sub-mm Optics Research Group Department of Experimental Physics National University of Ireland, Maynooth Co. Kildare Ireland 9th July 2014 Contents 1 The Cosmic Microwave Background 8 1.1 A signal from the early Universe . 8 1.2 A brief history of CMB observations . 9 1.3 Modern Cosmology and the CMB . 12 1.3.1 The Big Bang and the expanding Universe . 12 1.3.2 CMB temperature power spectra . 14 1.3.3 Primary temperature anisotropies . 18 1.3.4 Secondary anisotropies . 19 1.3.5 CMB Polarization . 21 1.3.6 The CMB and Inflation . 27 1.4 Recent CMB experiments . 28 1.5 The CMB and the cosmological parameters . 29 1.6 Conclusions . 33 2 QUBIC: An Experiment designed to measure CMB B-mode polarization 35 2.1 Introducing QUBIC . 35 2.2 Interferometry . 35 2.2.1 Interferometers in astronomy . 35 2.2.2 Radio receivers . 37 2.2.3 Additive Bolometric Interferometry . 39 2.3 The QUBIC experiment . 41 2.3.1 QUBIC specifications . 42 2.4 Phase Shifting and equivalent baselines . 49 2.5 Quasi optical analysis techniques . 55 2.5.1 Methods for the optical modeling of CMB experiments . 55 2.5.2 Geometrical optics . 58 2 2.5.3 Physical optics (PO) . 59 2.5.4 Quasi optics .
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetic Inductance Detectors for the OLIMPO Experiment: In–Flight Operation and Performance
    Prepared for submission to JCAP Kinetic Inductance Detectors for the OLIMPO experiment: in–flight operation and performance S. Masi,a;b;1 P. de Bernardis,a;b A. Paiella,a;b F. Piacentini,a;b L. Lamagna,a;b A. Coppolecchia,a;b P. A. R. Ade,c E. S. Battistelli,a;b M. G. Castellano,d I. Colantoni,d;e F. Columbro,a;b G. D’Alessandro,a;b M. De Petris,a;b S. Gordon, f C. Magneville,g P. Mauskopf, f;h G. Pettinari,d G. Pisano,c G. Polenta,i G. Presta,a;b E. Tommasi,i C. Tucker,c V. Vdovin,l;m A. Volpei and D. Yvong aDipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy bIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy cSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3YB, UK dIstituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie - CNR, Via Cineto Romano 42, 00156 Roma, Italy ecurrent address: CNR-Nanotech, Institute of Nanotechnology c/o Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, 00185, Roma, Italy f School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA gIRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France hDepartment of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85257, USA iItalian Space Agency, Roma, Italy lInstitute of Applied Physics RAS, State Technical University, Nizhnij Novgorov, Russia mASC Lebedev PI RAS, Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We report on the performance of lumped–elements Kinetic Inductance Detector (KID) arrays for mm and sub–mm wavelengths, operated at 0:3 K during the stratospheric flight of the OLIMPO payload, at an altitude of 37:8 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal 2003.Tex
    i TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF PERSONNEL AND WORK EFFORT -3 1 SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES, AND SIGNIFICANCE 2 3 TECHNICAL APPROACH 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Radiometer Design and Calibration 6 3.3 Radiometer Module — “Radiometer on a Chip” 6 3.4 Massive Array Integration 8 3.5 Optical Design 9 3.6 Orthomode Transducers 10 3.7 Data Acquisition and Bias Control Board 10 4 BOLOMETERS AND HEMTs: Comparative Assessment 11 5 IMPACT ON THE FIELD & RELATIONSHIP TO PREVIOUS AWARD 13 5.1 Impact on the Field 13 5.2 Results of Previous Work 13 6 RELEVANCE TO NASA STRATEGIC PLAN 14 7WORK PLAN 14 7.1 Overview 14 7.2 Roles of Investigators 15 7.3 Management Structure 15 7.4 Technical Challenges 15 7.5 Milestones 15 REFERENCES 16 SUMMARY OF PERSONNEL AND WORK EFFORT iii SUMMARY OF PERSONNEL AND WORK EFFORT The proposed work is one piece of a larger effort with many components, funded from several sources, as detailed in the proposal. The table below lists the fractional support for investigators requested in this proposal alone, and also the total fraction of time they are devoting to the entire larger effort. Percentages are averages over two years. See budget and text for details. TIME Name Status Institution This prop. Total T. Gaier ................... PI JPL 22% 72% C. R. Lawrence ............. CoI JPL 5% 15% M. Seiffert ................. CoI JPL 18% 45% S. Staggs .................. CoI Princeton 10% B. Winstein ................ CoI UChicago 20% E. Wollack ................. CoI GSFC 10% A. C. S. Readhead .......... CoIlaborator Caltech T.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bit of History Satellites Balloons Ground-Based
    Experimental Landscape ● A Bit of History ● Satellites ● Balloons ● Ground-Based Ground-Based Experiments There have been many: ABS, ACBAR, ACME, ACT, AMI, AMiBA, APEX, ATCA, BEAST, BICEP[2|3]/Keck, BIMA, CAPMAP, CAT, CBI, CLASS, COBRA, COSMOSOMAS, DASI, MAT, MUSTANG, OVRO, Penzias & Wilson, etc., PIQUE, Polatron, Polarbear, Python, QUaD, QUBIC, QUIET, QUIJOTE, Saskatoon, SP94, SPT, SuZIE, SZA, Tenerife, VSA, White Dish & more! QUAD 2017-11-17 Ganga/Experimental Landscape 2/33 Balloons There have been a number: 19 GHz Survey, Archeops, ARGO, ARCADE, BOOMERanG, EBEX, FIRS, MAX, MAXIMA, MSAM, PIPER, QMAP, Spider, TopHat, & more! BOOMERANG 2017-11-17 Ganga/Experimental Landscape 3/33 Satellites There have been 4 (or 5?): Relikt, COBE, WMAP, Planck (+IRTS!) Planck 2017-11-17 Ganga/Experimental Landscape 4/33 Rockets & Airplanes For example, COBRA, Berkeley-Nagoya Excess, U2 Anisotropy Measurements & others... It’s difficult to get integration time on these platforms, so while they are still used in the infrared, they are no longer often used for the http://aether.lbl.gov/www/projects/U2/ CMB. 2017-11-17 Ganga/Experimental Landscape 5/33 (from R. Stompor) Radek Stompor http://litebird.jp/eng/ 2017-11-17 Ganga/Experimental Landscape 6/33 Other Satellite Possibilities ● US “CMB Probe” ● CORE-like – Studying two possibilities – Discussions ongoing ● Imager with India/ISRO & others ● Spectrophotometer – Could include imager – Inputs being prepared for AND low-angular- the Decadal Process resolution spectrophotometer? https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/
    [Show full text]
  • Wideband Digital Correlator Development for Amiba
    1 Wideband Digital Correlator Development for AMiBA Chao-Te Li*, Homin Jiang, Howard Liu, Derek Kubo, Kim Guzzino and Ming-Tang Chen ionization (EoR), when the protostars were formed to re-ionize Abstract—A wideband digital correlator using high ‐ speed the HI in the early universe [4], a digital correlator is needed to analog‐to‐digital converters (ADCs) and field‐programmable gate obtain finer spectral resolutions for molecular line observations. arrays (FPGAs) was developed for the Array for Microwave Assuming CO is abundant in galaxies, the observations of CO Background Anisotropy (AMiBA). The objective is to detect lines can trace the protostars and galaxies. The results would be spectral lines for intensity mapping in cosmology. To make use of complementary to the HI observations. However, AMiBA the 16‐GHz intermediate frequency (IF) bandwidth of AMiBA, a receivers may have to observe at lower frequencies because the 5 giga sample per second (Gsps) ADC was developed. The IF signals were downconverted, digitized, and then streamed through spectral lines have been red shifted. FPGA‐based processing units for correlation. A prototype one‐ baseline correlator using 5‐Gsps ADC modules has been deployed. The correlator for a seven‐ element system is currently under development. Index Terms—AMiBA, correlator, digital signal processing (DSP), FPGA, intensity mapping I. INTRODUCTION he Array for Microwave Background Anisotropy (AMiBA) T [1] detects finite differences in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) - the thermal remnant of the Big Bang. AMiBA receivers observe in the W‐band, from 86 to 102 GHz, where the foreground contamination, such as dust emission, Fig.
    [Show full text]