DOCSLIB.ORG

8.5 X 11.5 Doublelines.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8.5 X 11.5 Doublelines.P65 Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83927-3 - Fundamentals of Structural Geology David D. Pollard and Raymond C. Fletcher Index More information Index acceleration convention dip of gravity 251 on-in 209 angle of 55 linear 246 right-hand 54, 90, 99, 216, 247 apparent 55 particle 263 coordinates direction of 54 vector 245 Eulerian 263 direction angle 38, 42, 68 accretionary wedge 393, 410 Lagrangian 262 direction cosine 43 ,68 Airy stress function 310, 313 material 262 direction number 112 Amonton’s law 351 right-handed 36, 39 dislocation Anderson’s standard state 229 spatial 263 core 302 anisotropy 325, 416 coordinate system edge 301 elastic 325 Cartesian 34, 36 glide plane 302 viscous 416 cylindrical 44 line 301 annum 124 elliptical 47 screw 302 anticrack 17 polar 45 displacement arc length 82 spherical 48 discontinuity of 469 azimuth 54 correspondence principle 387 gradient of 185 Coulomb vector 160, 185, 191 basin and range 436 criterion 358 divergence 268 binomial distribution 67 critical angle 360 divergence theorem 275 boundary condition 46, 132, 214 critical stress 361 ductile state 338 boundary value problem 10, 236, stress 359 dynamics 279, 285, 299, 308, 388 curvature particle 245 boudinage 423 Gaussian 114 rigid body 248 brittle state 334, 338 mean principal normal 114 brittle-ductile transition 7 principal normal 110, 113 effective spring constant 202 Buckingham theorem 140 principal directions of normal 111, effective thickness 466 Burgers vector 302 113 eigenvalue 219 Byerlee’s law 354 radius of 86 eigenvector 219 scalar 85 elastic modulus cartographic criterion vector 84 bulk 298 equidistance, conformality, cylindrical structure 299 shear 278, 298 equivalency 30 Lame’s 278, 299 Cauchy’s tetrahedron 203, 213, damage zone 355 Poisson’s ratio 295 215 datum 27 tangent 294 Cauchy’s formula 213 sea level 29 Young’s 294 center of gravity 252 deformation elastic solid center of mass 249 gradient 185, 190 linear 292 cleavage 169 Green tensor of 190 non-linear 293 compatibility 310, 314 homogeneous 154, 189 orthotropic 329 compliance 326 inelastic 293 transversally isotropic composite material 446 progressive 177 328 compressibility 295 degree Celsius 124 elastic heterogeneity 323 conservation law diapir 137 element of angular momentum 252, 274 differential geometry 75 linear 52 of linear momentum 250, 269 dike 9, 40, 47, 100 planar 52 of mass 266 dimensional analysis 127 epicenter 7 constitutive law 276, 278, 283, 326, direct method of 133, 135 equation of state 283 416 Rayleigh method of 137 equilibrium continuity 266, 268 dimensional homogeneity 128 quasi-static 280, 309 continuum 124 dimensionless group 132 static 251, 253 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83927-3 - Fundamentals of Structural Geology David D. Pollard and Raymond C. Fletcher Index More information 498 INDEX Euclidean space 37 propagation of 354 lineation Euler’s theorem 111 shear 334 discrete 77 sliding 372 penetrative 64, 77, 80 fabric splitting 334 metamorphic 64 diagram of 64 tearing 372 superficial 77 failure criterion fracture toughness 357 local rate of change 265 Griffith 369 friction lubrication theory 394 Coulomb 358 coefficient of 353 failure surface 345 coefficient of internal 359 mass 245 fault dynamic 352 material continuum 124 normal 70 static 351 material line 154, 185 reverse 70 frictional strength 353 material time derivative 266 strike-slip 72 fundamental form matrix termination of 13 first 103 column 50 thrust 256 coefficients of 104, 108 identity 219 tipline of 13 second 108 row 50 fault-plane solution 228 Froude Number 147 square 51 fluid metrology 122 anisotropic viscous 481 Gauss’s theorem 275 minimal surface 114 power-law 389, 423, 426 geographic coordinates Mohr diagram 223 linear viscous 282, 385, (easting, northing, elevation) 31 momentum fold (latitude, longitude, elevation) 27 angular 247, 248 antiformal 114 geoid 29 linear 246 axial surface of 92 geometric model 158 principle of 273 axis of 80, 92 Global Positioning System (GPS) 29 motion chevron 168, 418 graben 9 equation of 269, 272, 279, 285 cylindrical 81, 92 great circle 59 referential description of 260 dominant wavelength of 407 spatial description of 263 hinge of 92 homogeneous equation 219 moving trihedron 89 single layer 403 homogeneous material property 293 mullion 397 synformal 114 Hooke’s law 297, 325 foliation 64 hyperbolic function 47 nappe 155, 394 forward problem 153 hypocenter 8 neotectonics 159 force net body 196 incompressible 269, 284, 295, 387 Wulff (meridional stereographic) resultant 245, 250 index (dummy, free) 49 57 surface 196 indicial notation 49 Schmidt 63 flow inertial frame of reference 245, 247, Newton’s First Law 246 antiplane 388 249 Newton’s Second Law 204, 246 barotropic 183 inflection point 85 Newton’s Third Law 200 laminar 137 inverse problem 153 normal (pole) to a planar element plane 388 isochemical 244 62 steady 138, 165, 265, 386, 388 isothermal 244, 260, 293 turbulent 137 isotropy oöid 153 flux elastic 297 order of magnitude 123 mass 267 viscous 387 osculating plane 108, 110 momentum 270 fracture kinematic model 158 parametric representation 79, 93 extension 334 kinematics 158, 160 passive folding 175 hydraulic 234 kinetics 244 perfect confinement 234 mechanics of 356 Kronecker delta 50 photoelasticity 194, 226, 356 modes of 371,372 physical dimension 127 opening 237, 239, 354, 371 laccolith 21, 133, 461 plane curve 91 potential shear 358, 360 Lamé’s constant 278, 299 plate theory 463 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83927-3 - Fundamentals of Structural Geology David D. Pollard and Raymond C. Fletcher Index More information INDEX 499 plunge sliding principal normal 216, angle of 55 stable 351 principal trajectory of 220 direction of 55 stick-slip 351 shadow 325 Poisson’s ratio 295 slip shear component of 210 preferred orientation 64 dip 3 supplementary 469 pressure left-, right-lateral 18 tensile 208 breakdown 235, 237 strike 72 stress tensor 211, 214 confining 335, 345 small circle 59 Cartesian components of driving 290 Smoluchowski Number 148 cylindrical components of 212 effective confining 349 solution seam (surface) 17 deviation 346 mean normal 283 spring constant 202, 290 invariant of 221, 345 pore 346, 350 Stokes condition 284 stress-strain curve 338 re-opening 238 Stokes Number 148 stretch 154, 186 shut-in 235 strain strike static 283 axial 338 azimuth of 54 thermodynamic 283 bulk 172 line of 54 principal value problem 219 plain 299 substantial derivative 266 projection strain-rate thinning 423 summation convention 49 gnomonic 30 strain softening 423 Lambert (equal area) 63 strain tensor tangent plane 97 map 30 infinitesimal 186, 190, 278, 281, tensor stereographic (equal angle) 56 300 fourth-rank (order) 326 Universal Transverse Mercator Lagrangian 190 second-rank (order) 185, 214, 226 (UTM) 30 three-dimensional 190, 191 test prototype 144 two-dimensional 186 compression 319, 335 stream function 165 extension 334 rake 56 streamline 165 triaxial 347 Ramberg Number 148 strength 337 topographic contour 27 rate of twist 101 differential 347 torsion 90 reductionism 24, 456, 462 inherent shear 359 traction reference circle 56 intrinsic tensile 366 director surface 205 reference sphere 56 maximum shear 358 ellipsoid 205 reflection 39 octahedral shear 346 free surface 231, 310, 315 representative elementary area triaxial compressive 347 vector 198 203 uniaxial tensile, compressive transformation Reynolds transport theorem 275 342 coordinate (rotation) 39 Reynolds Number 137 stress homogeneous linear 174 rigidity axial 338 translation (rigid) 313 effective flexural 465 compressive 210 transpression 391, 393 flexural 464 concentration of 227, 237, 357 rotation (pure) 187 differential 347 umbilical point 113 rotation (rigid) 313 effective 348 unit vector hydrostatic 229, 298 binormal 89 scale factor 134, 137 intensity of 357, 372 normal 99, 107 scientific notation 123 in situ 234 principal normal 88 seismic reflection survey 11 isotropic state of 228 tangent 82 shear zone 334 lithostatic state of 230 unit of measurement 122 SI units 122 maximum shear 221, 358 UTM grid 33 significant figures 123 mean normal 298 similarity near-tip 356, 372 vector geometric 145 normal component of 208 base 36 kinematic 145 octahedral normal 346 cross product 87 dynamic 146 octahedral shear 346 dyadic product 270 slickenline 53 polyaxial state of 345 fixed 37 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83927-3 - Fundamentals of Structural Geology David D. Pollard and Raymond C. Fletcher Index More information 500 INDEX vector (cont.) particle 262 Newtonian 386 null 219 rupture 8 non-Newtonian 422 orthonormal basis 36 vector 247, 262, 264 position 34, 37 viscosity wellbore breakout 239 scalar component of 36 bulk 284 work scalar product 42 Newtonian 284, 386 principle of virtual 341 triple scalar product 90 Paul estimate of 449 vein 17 Reuss estimate of 447 xenolith 161 velocity Voight estimate of 448 local 264 viscous fluid Young’s modulus 294 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FIELD TRIP: Contractional Linkage Zones and Curved Faults, Garden of the Gods, with Illite Geochronology Exposé
    FIELD TRIP: Contractional linkage zones and curved faults, Garden of the Gods, with illite geochronology exposé Presenters: Christine Siddoway and Elisa Fitz Díaz. With contributions from Steven A.F. Smith, R.E. Holdsworth, and Hannah Karlsson This trip examines the structural geology and fault geochronology of Garden of the Gods, Colorado. An enclave of ‘red rock’ terrain that is noted for the sculptural forms upon steeply dipping sandstones (against the backdrop of Pikes Peak), this site of structural complexity lies at the south end of the Rampart Range fault (RRF) in the southern Colorado Front Range. It features Laramide backthrusts, bedding plane faults, and curved fault linkages within subvertical Mesozoic strata in the footwall of the RRF. Special subjects deserving of attention on this SGTF field trip are deformation band arrays and younger-upon-older, top-to-the-west reverse faults—that well may defy all comprehension! The timing of RRF deformation and formation of the Colorado Front Range have long been understood only in general terms, with reference to biostratigraphic controls within Laramide orogenic sedimentary rocks, that derive from the Laramide Front Range. Using 40Ar/39Ar illite age analysis of shear-generated illite, we are working to determine the precise timing of fault movement in the Garden of the Gods and surrounding region provide evidence for the time of formation of the Front Range monocline, to be compared against stratigraphic-biostratigraphic records from the Denver Basin. The field trip will complement an illite geochronology workshop being presented by Elisa Fitz Díaz on 19 June. If time allows, and there is participant interest, we will make a final stop to examine fault-bounded, massive sandstone- and granite-hosted clastic dikes that are associated with the Ute Pass fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiphase Boudinage: a Case Study of Amphibolites in Marble in the Naxos Migmatite Core
    Solid Earth, 9, 91–113, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-91-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Multiphase boudinage: a case study of amphibolites in marble in the Naxos migmatite core Simon Virgo, Christoph von Hagke, and Janos L. Urai Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstrasse 4–20, 52056 Aachen, Germany Correspondence: Simon Virgo ([email protected]) Received: 15 August 2017 – Discussion started: 23 August 2017 Revised: 18 December 2017 – Accepted: 20 December 2017 – Published: 15 February 2018 Abstract. In multiply deformed terrains multiphase boudi- sions, it has been shown that in three dimensions boudins can nage is common, but identification and analysis of these is be complex (Abe et al., 2013; Marques et al., 2012; Zulauf et difficult. Here we present an analysis of multiphase boudi- al., 2011b). This complexity can be distinctive when boudins nage and fold structures in deformed amphibolite layers in are the result of more than one deformation event. Some mul- marble from the migmatitic centre of the Naxos metamor- tiphase structures such as mullions or bone boudins are in- phic core complex. Overprinting between multiple boudi- dicative of a specific sequence of deformation (Kenis et al., nage generations is shown in exceptional 3-D outcrop. We 2005; Maeder et al., 2009). Chocolate tablet boudins form identify five generations of boudinage, reflecting the transi- by two phases of extension of layers in different directions tion from high-strain high-temperature ductile deformation (Abe and Urai, 2012; Ghosh, 1988; Zulauf et al., 2011a, to medium- to low-strain brittle boudins formed during cool- b), and have been used to analyse the deformation history ing and exhumation.
    [Show full text]
  • Describe the Geometry of a Fault (1) Orientation of the Plane (Strike and Dip) (2) Slip Vector
    Learning goals - January 16, 2012 You will understand how to: Describe the geometry of a fault (1) orientation of the plane (strike and dip) (2) slip vector Understand concept of slip rate and how it is estimated Describe faults (the above plus some jargon weʼll need) Categories of Faults (EOSC 110 version) “Normal” fault “Thrust” or “reverse” fault “Strike-slip” or “transform” faults Two kinds of strike-slip faults Right-lateral Left-lateral (dextral) (sinistral) Stand with your feet on either side of the fault. Which side comes toward you when the fault slips? Another way to tell: stand on one side of the fault looking toward it. Which way does the block on the other side move? Right-lateral Left-lateral (dextral) (sinistral) 1992 M 7.4 Landers, California Earthquake rupture (SCEC) Describing the fault geometry: fault plane orientation How do you usually describe a plane (with lines)? In geology, we choose these two lines to be: • strike • dip strike dip • strike is the azimuth of the line where the fault plane intersects the horizontal plane. Measured clockwise from N. • dip is the angle with respect to the horizontal of the line of steepest descent (perpendic. to strike) (a ball would roll down it). strike “60°” dip “30° (to the SE)” Profile view, as often shown on block diagrams strike 30° “hanging wall” “footwall” 0° N Map view Profile view 90° W E 270° S 180° Strike? Dip? 45° 45° Map view Profile view Strike? Dip? 0° 135° Indicating direction of slip quantitatively: the slip vector footwall • let’s define the slip direction (vector)
    [Show full text]
  • Ductile Deformation, Boudinage, Continentward-Dipping
    Rifted margins: Ductile deformation, boudinage, continentward-dipping normal faults and the role of the weak lower crust Camille Clerc, Jean-Claude Ringenbach, Laurent Jolivet, Jean-François Ballard To cite this version: Camille Clerc, Jean-Claude Ringenbach, Laurent Jolivet, Jean-François Ballard. Rifted margins: Ductile deformation, boudinage, continentward-dipping normal faults and the role of the weak lower crust. Gondwana Research, Elsevier, 2018, 53, pp.20-40. 10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.030. insu-01522472 HAL Id: insu-01522472 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01522472 Submitted on 15 May 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Accepted Manuscript Rifted margins: Ductile deformation, boudinage, continentward- dipping normal faults and the role of the weak lower crust Camille Clerc, Jean-Claude Ringenbach, Laurent Jolivet, Jean- François Ballard PII: S1342-937X(17)30215-0 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.030 Reference: GR 1802 To appear in: Received date: 4 July 2016 Revised date: 21 April 2017 Accepted date: 28 April 2017 Please cite this article as: Camille Clerc, Jean-Claude Ringenbach, Laurent Jolivet, Jean- François Ballard , Rifted margins: Ductile deformation, boudinage, continentward-dipping normal faults and the role of the weak lower crust, (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.030 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercian 11 B Hunter.Indd
    The Cressbrook Dale Lava and Litton Tuff, between Longstone and Hucklow Edges, Derbyshire John Hunter and Richard Shaw Abstract: With only a small exposure near the head of its eponymous dale, the Cressbrook Dale Lava is the least exposed of the major lava flows interbedded within the Carboniferous platform- carbonate succession of the Derbyshire Peak District. It underlies a large area of the limestone plateau between Longstone Edge and the Eyam and Hucklow edges. The recent closure of all of the quarries and underground mines in this area provided a stimulus to locate and compile the existing subsurface information relating to the lava-field and, supplemented by airborne geophysical survey results, to use these data to interpret the buried volcanic landscape. The same sub-surface data-set is used to interpret the spatial distribution of the overlying Litton Tuff. Within the regional north-south crustal extension that survey indicate that the outcrops of igneous rocks in affected central and northern Britain on the north side the White Peak are only part of a much larger volcanic of the Wales-Brabant High during the early part of the field, most of which is concealed at depth beneath Carboniferous, a province of subsiding platforms, tilt- Millstone Grit and Coal Measures farther east. Because blocks and half-grabens developed beneath a shallow no large volcano structures have been discovered so continental sea. Intra-plate magmatism accompanied far, geological literature describes the lavas in the the lithospheric thinning, with basic igneous rocks White Peak as probably originating from four separate erupting at different times from a number of small, local centres, each being active in a different area at different volcanic centres scattered across a region extending times (Smith et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Ductile Deformation - Concepts of Finite Strain
    327 Ductile deformation - Concepts of finite strain Deformation includes any process that results in a change in shape, size or location of a body. A solid body subjected to external forces tends to move or change its displacement. These displacements can involve four distinct component patterns: - 1) A body is forced to change its position; it undergoes translation. - 2) A body is forced to change its orientation; it undergoes rotation. - 3) A body is forced to change size; it undergoes dilation. - 4) A body is forced to change shape; it undergoes distortion. These movement components are often described in terms of slip or flow. The distinction is scale- dependent, slip describing movement on a discrete plane, whereas flow is a penetrative movement that involves the whole of the rock. The four basic movements may be combined. - During rigid body deformation, rocks are translated and/or rotated but the original size and shape are preserved. - If instead of moving, the body absorbs some or all the forces, it becomes stressed. The forces then cause particle displacement within the body so that the body changes its shape and/or size; it becomes deformed. Deformation describes the complete transformation from the initial to the final geometry and location of a body. Deformation produces discontinuities in brittle rocks. In ductile rocks, deformation is macroscopically continuous, distributed within the mass of the rock. Instead, brittle deformation essentially involves relative movements between undeformed (but displaced) blocks. Finite strain jpb, 2019 328 Strain describes the non-rigid body deformation, i.e. the amount of movement caused by stresses between parts of a body.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Olivine Fabrics and Mylonite in the Presence of Fluid
    Jung et al. Earth, Planets and Space 2014, 66:46 http://www.earth-planets-space.com/content/66/1/46 FULL PAPER Open Access Characterization of olivine fabrics and mylonite in the presence of fluid and implications for seismic anisotropy and shear localization Sejin Jung1, Haemyeong Jung1* and Håkon Austrheim2 Abstract The Lindås Nappe, Bergen Arc, is located in western Norway and displays two high-grade metamorphic structures. A Precambrian granulite facies foliation is transected by Caledonian fluid-induced eclogite-facies shear zones and pseudotachylytes. To understand how a superimposed tectonic event may influence olivine fabric and change seismic anisotropy, two lenses of spinel lherzolite were studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) techniques. The granulite foliation of the surrounding anorthosite complex is displayed in ultramafic lenses as a modal variation in olivine, pyroxenes, and spinel, and the Caledonian eclogite-facies structure in the surrounding anorthosite gabbro is represented by thin (<1 cm) garnet-bearing ultramylonite zones. The olivine fabrics in the spinel bearing assemblage were E-type and B-type and a combination of A- and B-type lattice preferred orientations (LPOs). There was a change in olivine fabric from a combination of A- and B-type LPOs in the spinel bearing assemblage to B- and E-type LPOs in the garnet lherzolite mylonite zones. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analyses reveal that the water content of olivine in mylonite is much higher (approximately 600 ppm H/Si) than that in spinel lherzolite (approximately 350 ppm H/Si), indicating that water caused the difference in olivine fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation Rules for Lithology Merge Information Entry
    State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Vicki S. McConnell, State Geologist OREGON GEOLOGIC DIGITAL COMPILATION RULES FOR LITHOLOGY MERGE INFORMATION ENTRY G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 2006 Revisions: Feburary 2, 2005 January 1, 2006 NOTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the infor- mation furthers the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of the information, this report is published as received from the authors and has not been edited to our usual standards. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation Published in conformance with ORS 516.030 For copies of this publication or other information about Oregon’s geology and natural resources, contact: Nature of the Northwest Information Center 800 NE Oregon Street #5 Portland, Oregon 97232 (971) 673-1555 http://www.naturenw.org Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries - Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation i RULES FOR LITHOLOGY MERGE INFORMATION ENTRY The lithology merge unit contains 5 parts, separated by periods: Major characteristic.Lithology.Layering.Crystals/Grains.Engineering Lithology Merge Unit label (Lith_Mrg_U field in GIS polygon file): major_characteristic.LITHOLOGY.Layering.Crystals/Grains.Engineering major characteristic - lower case, places the unit into a general category .LITHOLOGY - in upper case, generally the compositional/common chemical lithologic name(s)
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Meers Fault, Southwestern Oklahoma: Modeling and Uncertainties
    Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Meers Fault, Southwestern Oklahoma: Modeling and Uncertainties Emma M. Baker and Austin A. Holland Special Publication SP2013-02 DRAFT REPORT MAY 16, 2013 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Sarkeys Energy Center 100 East Boyd St., Rm. N-131 Norman, Oklahoma 73019-0628 SPECIAL PUBLICATION SERIES The Oklahoma Geological Survey’s Special Publication series is designed to bring new geologic information to the public in a manner efficient in both time and cost. The material undergoes a minimum of editing and is published for the most part as a final, author-prepared report. Each publication is numbered according to the year in which it was published and the order of its publication within that year. Gaps in the series occur when a publication has gone out of print or when no applicable publications were issued in that year. This publication is issued by the Oklahoma Geological Survey as authorized by Title 70, Oklahoma Statutes, 1971, Section 3310, and Title 74, Oklahoma Statutes, 1971, Sections 231-238. This publication is only available as an electronic publication. 1. Table of Contents 2. Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1. Geologic Background ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coulomb Stress Evolution in Northeastern Caribbean Over the Past 250 Years Due to Coseismic, Postseismic and Interseismic Deformation
    Geophys. J. Int. (2008) 174, 904–918 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03634.x Coulomb stress evolution in Northeastern Caribbean over the past 250 years due to coseismic, postseismic and interseismic deformation Syed Tabrez Ali,1 Andrew M. Freed,1 Eric Calais,1 David M. Manaker1,∗ and William R. McCann2 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Dr, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Earth Scientific Consultants, 10210 West 102nd Ave, Westminster, CO 80021,USA Accepted 2007 September 24. Received 2007 September 19; in original form 2007 July 21 SUMMARY The Northeastern Caribbean region accommodates ∼20 mm yr−1 of oblique convergence be- tween the North American and Caribbean plates, which is distributed between the subduction interface and major strike-slip faults within the overriding plate. As a result, this heavily populated region has experienced eleven large (M ≥ 7.0) earthquakes over the past 250 yr. In an effort to improve our understanding of the location and timing of these earthquakes, with an eye to understand where current seismic hazards may be greatest, we calculate the evolution of Coulomb stress on the major faults since 1751 due to coseismic, postseismic, and interseismic deformation. Our results quantify how earthquakes serve to relieve stress accumulated due to interseismic loading and how fault systems communicate with each other, serving both to advance or retard subsequent events. We find that the observed progressive westwards propagation of earthquakes on the Septentrional and Enriquillo strike-slip faults and along the megathrust was encouraged by coseismic stress changes associated with prior earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Boudinage Classification
    Journal of Structural Geology 26 (2004) 739–763 www.elsevier.com/locate/jsg Boudinage classification: end-member boudin types and modified boudin structuresq Ben D. Goscombea,*, Cees W. Passchierb, Martin Handa aContinental Evolution Research Group, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Adelaide University, Adelaide, S.A. 5005, Australia bInstitut fuer Geowissenschaften, Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet, Becherweg 21, Mainz, Germany Received 28 March 2002; received in revised form 25 August 2003; accepted 30 August 2003 Abstract In monoclinic shear zones, there are only three ways a layer can be boudinaged, leading to three kinematic classes of boudinage. These are (1) symmetrically without slip on the inter-boudin surface (no-slip boudinage), and two classes with asymmetrical slip on the inter-boudin surface: slip being either (2) synthetic (S-slip boudinage) or (3) antithetic (A-slip boudinage) with respect to bulk shear sense. In S-slip boudinage, the boudins rotate antithetically, and in antithetic slip boudinage they rotate synthetically with respect to shear sense. We have investigated the geometry of 2100 natural boudins from a wide variety of geological contexts worldwide. Five end-member boudin block geometries that are easily distinguished in the field encompass the entire range of natural boudins. These five end-member boudin block geometries are characterized and named drawn, torn, domino, gash and shearband boudins. Groups of these are shown to operate almost exclusively by only one kinematic class; drawn and torn boudins extend by no-slip, domino and gash boudins form by A-slip and shearband boudins develop by S-slip boudinage. In addition to boudin block geometry, full classification must also consider boudin train obliquity with respect to the fabric attractor and material layeredness of the boudinaged rock mass.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANE DIP and STRIKE, LINEATION PLUNGE and TREND, STRUCTURAL MEASURMENT CONVENTIONS, the BRUNTON COMPASS, FIELD BOOK, and NJGS FMS
    PLANE DIP and STRIKE, LINEATION PLUNGE and TREND, STRUCTURAL MEASURMENT CONVENTIONS, THE BRUNTON COMPASS, FIELD BOOK, and NJGS FMS The word azimuth stems from an Arabic word meaning "direction“, and means an angular measurement in a spherical coordinate system. In structural geology, we primarily deal with land navigation and directional readings on two-dimensional maps of the Earth surface, and azimuth commonly refers to incremental measures in a circular (0- 360 °) and horizontal reference frame relative to land surface. Sources: Lisle, R. J., 2004, Geological Structures and Maps, A Practical Guide, Third edition http://www.geo.utexas.edu/courses/420k/PDF_files/Brunton_Compass_09.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunton_compass FLASH DRIVE/Rider/PDFs/Holcombe_conv_and_meas.pdf http://www.state.nj.us/dep/njgs/geodata/fmsdoc/fmsuser.htm Brunton Pocket Transit Rider Structural Geology 310 2012 GCHERMAN 1 PlanePlane DipDip andand LinearLinear PlungePlunge horizontal dddooo Dip = dddooo Bedding and other geological layers and planes that are not horizontal are said to dip. The dip is the slope of a geological surface. There are two aspects to the dip of a plane: (a) the direction of dip , which is the compass direction towards which the plane slopes; and (b) the angle of dip , which is the angle that the plane makes with a horizontal plane (Fig. 2.3). The direction of dip can be visualized as the direction in which water would flow if poured onto the plane. The angle of dip is an angle between 0 ° (for horizontal planes) and 90 ° (for vertical planes). To record the dip of a plane all that is needed are two numbers; the angle of dip followed by the direction (or azimuth) of dip, e.g.
    [Show full text]