DOCSLIB.ORG

46580164.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
46580164.Pdf Cohen, David Eliezer (2015) The Biblical exegesis of Don Isaac Abrabanel. PhD thesis. SOAS University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/22803/ Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. THE BIBLICAL EXEGESIS OF DON ISAAC ABRABANEL DAVID ELIEZER COHEN Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD 2015 Department of the Study of Religions, SOAS, University of London 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 3-35 INTRODUCTION Pages 36-94 CHAPTER 1: BIOGRAPHICAL OUTLINE OF DON ISAAC ABRABANEL (1437-1508) Pages 95-154 CHAPTER 2: ABRABANEL’S BIBLICAL EXEGESIS: ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE, METHODOLOGY, STYLE AND CONTENT Pages 155-188 CHAPTER 3: ABRABANEL’S EXEGESIS OF I SAMUEL 1: DETAILED ANALYSIS Pages 189-225 CHAPTER 4: RELIGION AND POLITICS: A SURVEY OF ABRABANEL’S POLITICAL VIEWS AS EXPRESSED IN HIS BIBLICAL EXEGESIS Pages 226-270 CHAPTER 5: ABRABANEL’S STANCE TOWARDS CHRISTIANITY Pages 271-313 CHAPTER 6: ABRABANEL AND THE KARAITES Pages 314-351 CHAPTER 7: RACE AND ETHNICITY IN ABRABANEL’S BIBLICAL EXEGESIS Pages 352-389 CHAPTER 8: THE RECEPTION HISTORY OF ABRABANEL’S COMMENTARIES Pages 390-408 CHAPTER 9: OVERALL CONCLUSIONS Pages 409-424 BIBLIOGRAPHY Pages 425-453 APPENDIX 2 I. Introduction 1. The Subject of my Dissertation The subject of this dissertation is a study of Don Isaac ben Judah Abrabanel (also variously referred to as ‘Abarbanel’ or ‘Abravanel’ (1437-1508), insofar as his contribution to biblical exegesis is concerned. My study will also necessarily touch upon Abrabanel’s thought as Philosopher and Theologian, since (in common with many other biblical commentators) his philosophical and theological perspective heavily permeates his exegetical writings. My study commences with an introductory biographical outline of the salient facts relating to Abrabanel’s lineage, the religious and cultural milieu in which he was reared, his early religious and secular education, his particular gifts and talents, the personal, intellectual and social contacts forged by him, his appointment to high state office in various countries, achievements as Jewish communal leader, and enforced migrations throughout southern Europe as a result of supervening political events. It will also contain information on the elements of education of Jews of the late medieval and Renaissance eras. All these matters need to be mentioned as backdrop to Abrabanel’s exegetical and theological compositions, since, as expected, and as will presently be demonstrated, they heavily influenced the direction of his thinking, and hence the contents of his exegesis. However, this biographical chapter will be subordinated to the primary focus of my study, a detailed analysis of Abrabanel’s exegetical structure, methodology and 3 literary style, and of the substantive content of his commentaries. My study will extend over the full range of the biblical commentaries, so as to present a rounded and balanced picture. It will, wherever possible, include comparisons and contrasts with the exegesis of Abrabanel’s predecessors and contemporaries, and a survey of the considerable impact made by him upon subsequent theological and exegetical scholarship. Finally, there will be a number of specialised thematic chapters devoted to selected topics of particular interest. 1.2 Review of Existing Literature The ensuing discussion of previous relevant scholarship in the field will be both descriptive and analytical. Much secondary literature is available in relation to Abrabanel as biblical exegete. Whilst it is not feasible to refer to every author who has written on the subject, I shall refer to the views of those I regard as having made the most significant and useful contributions, and such views will, in turn, be subjected to detailed critical analysis to determine their validity in light of all available evidence from primary sources. For practical reasons, preference will be accorded to secondary literature composed in English or Hebrew (languages in which I am fluent), and in which most of the major literature is written; but it would be misleading to omit altogether references to scholarly contributions in German, French or Spanish where these clearly contribute to a profounder understanding of the subject. In such instances, I shall perforce rely, wherever possible, upon such English-language summaries of the main themes of the books, or articles, in question as are appended thereto, or on summaries contained in other secondary literature composed in English. I do, however, possess a working knowledge of French and Latin, which has enabled 4 me to read and/or translate unaided some important literary material in those languages. 1.2.1 Primary Sources The primary sources for the study of Abrabanel’s biblical exegesis are, naturally, the commentaries themselves, composed variously by him, in Hebrew, in Portugal, Spain, Naples and Venice between the mid-1460s and 1508, the year of his death. He wrote on the entire Pentateuch, the Former and Latter Prophets, and the Book of Daniel in the Hagiographa. There are other commentaries and chronicles, too; namely, the exegetical works of Abrabanel’s Jewish predecessors regularly cited by him. The most prominent of these are the commentaries of Rashi (N. France, 11th/12th cent.), R. Abraham ibn Ezra (Spain/Italy 11th/12th cent.), R. David Kimhi (‘Radak’) (S. France, 12th/13th cent.), Nahmanides (Spain/Palestine-12th/13th cent.), R. Levi b. Gershon [Gersonides] (S. France, 13th/14th cent.), the ‘D’rashot’ of R. Nissim Gerondi (‘Ran’) (Spain, 13th/14th cent.), and Maimonides’(12th/13th cents.) Guide for the Perplexed. Besides these, Abrabanel occasionally refers to the commentaries of Saadia Gaon (Egypt/Babylonia, 9th/10th cent.), the Gaon Samuel b. Hofni (Babylonia, 10th/11th cent.) and Joseph Ibn Kaspi (S. France/ Spain, 13th/14th cent.), and to the historical chronicles of the medieval historian Joseph (‘Josippon’) b. Gorion (S. Italy, 10th cent.), who produced an abridged, Hebrew version of the works of the ancient Jewish historian Josephus. For non-Jewish writings, a convenient sub-division may be made between, on the one hand, citations from pagan, classical writers, such as Plato, Aristotle and Seneca, 5 some of whose views Abrabanel paraphrases in the philosophical sections of his commentaries, and on the other, citations or paraphrases of extracts from the works of previous Christian theologians and Church Fathers, notably Jerome (Palestine, 4th/5th cent.), Augustine (N. Africa,4th/5th cent.), Aquinas (Cologne/Paris/Naples,13th cent.), Nicholas de Lyra (France/Burgundy, 13th/14th cent.) and Paul of Burgos (formerly Solomon ha-Levi, a celebrated 14th century convert to Christianity). Reference will be made in due course to a significant number of such primary sources in my discussion of Abrabanel’s own stance on the validity of the views of the various authors cited in his exegesis. 1.2.2 Secondary Literature. This again may conveniently be sub-divided into two distinct categories. The first comprises the works of Jewish and Christian biblical commentators writing during the period between Abrabanel’s death and the early 20th century, mainly of a sacred character, who cite Abrabanel’s commentaries either approvingly or disparagingly (as the case may be), within their own works. The names of many such exegetes will be provided in a subsequent ‘Reception History’ chapter. However, we may appropriately single out here some particularly eminent commentators throughout the ages who were manifestly influenced by Abrabanel. On the Jewish side, there are Solomon Ephraim Luntschitz (Poland, 16th/17th cent), author of the homiletical commentary ‘Kli Yakar’ on the Pentateuch, Menasseh ben Israel (Netherlands,17th cent.), David Altschuler (Poland, 18th cent.), author of the classic ‘Metzudot’, commentaries on the Prophets and Hagiographa, an admirer, Meir Malbim (Eastern Europe/ Prussia,19th cent.), another ardent admirer, with occasional reservations, 6 Samuel David Luzzatto (19th cent.), the renowned Italian scholar (‘Shadal’), and David Z. Hoffmann (Germany,19th/20th cent.). On the Christian side, it has been noted that as many as thirty biblical commentators have either translated parts of Abrabanel’s works into Latin or cited him, either approvingly or otherwise. Amongst the most famous of these are Johannes Buxtorf the Younger (Switzerland, 17th cent.), the early international jurist and biblical scholar Hugo Grotius (Netherlands, 17th cent.), and the Jesuit Oratorian, Richard Simon (France, 17th/18th cent.), regarded by some as the father of modern biblical criticism. The second category of secondary literature comprises the modern academic (non- sacred) work of historians, philosophers, biographers, and exponents of ‘Judische Wissenschaft’ on Abrabanel as a biblical exegete. The term ‘modern’ utilised here is intended to denote the period extending from the second third of the 19th century to date. In fact, virtually nothing of importance belonging to this genre was written about Abrabanel until the earlier half of that century, when several ‘Haskalah’ scholars addressed themselves to the issue of alleged plagiarism in his writings – an issue originally raised by his near-contemporaries Meir Arama (son of Isaac Arama, author of ‘Aqedat Yishaq’) and David Messer Leon in the early 16th century but long-since forgotten. An article on this theme appeared in a Judeo-German publication, ‘Israelitische Annalen’, in 1839, by E. Carmoly.1 This was followed the very next year by a similar type of article in the same journal by S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philosophic Homilies of Nissim of Girona - 14704
    Syllabus PHILOSOPHIC HOMILIES OF NISSIM OF GIRONA - 14704 Last update 12-09-2021 HU Credits: 2 Degree/Cycle: 2nd degree (Master) Responsible Department: Jewish Thought Academic year: 0 Semester: 1st Semester Teaching Languages: Hebrew Campus: Mt. Scopus Course/Module Coordinator: Prof. Zeev Harvey Coordinator Email: [email protected] Coordinator Office Hours: Tu 11:30-12:30 Teaching Staff: Prof Zeev Harvey page 1 / 4 Course/Module description: One of the great medieval authorities on Jewish law, Rabbi Nissim ben Reuben of Girona ( Ha-Ran, c. 1310-1376) is known for his Commentary on BT Nedarim, his Commentaries on Rabbi Isaac Alfasi's Halakhot, and his Novellae on various Talmudic tractates. However, he was also a profound and original philosophic homilist. His book of philosophic homilies, known as "Derashot Ha-Ran," had a significant influence on medieval Jewish philosophy both directly and also indirectly, through his student Rabbi Hasdai Crescas and his student's student Rabbi Joseph Albo. Course/Module aims: We shall read together one homily from Derashot Ha-Ran. In the last month of the semester, we shall discuss the papers of participants. Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to: ability to analyze a medieval philosophic sermon Attendance requirements(%): 100% Teaching arrangement and method of instruction: Reading and discussion Course/Module Content: A seminar paper (about 20-25 pp.) or a short paper (about 7-10 pp.). The paper is to be submitted by the final class (11.1.22). It may be on any subject connected with Derashot Ha-Ran, and may be written in accordance with various approaches, e.g., historical, analytic, or philological.
    [Show full text]
  • TALMUDIC STUDIES Ephraim Kanarfogel
    chapter 22 TALMUDIC STUDIES ephraim kanarfogel TRANSITIONS FROM THE EAST, AND THE NASCENT CENTERS IN NORTH AFRICA, SPAIN, AND ITALY The history and development of the study of the Oral Law following the completion of the Babylonian Talmud remain shrouded in mystery. Although significant Geonim from Babylonia and Palestine during the eighth and ninth centuries have been identified, the extent to which their writings reached Europe, and the channels through which they passed, remain somewhat unclear. A fragile consensus suggests that, at least initi- ally, rabbinic teachings and rulings from Eretz Israel traveled most directly to centers in Italy and later to Germany (Ashkenaz), while those of Babylonia emerged predominantly in the western Sephardic milieu of Spain and North Africa.1 To be sure, leading Sephardic talmudists prior to, and even during, the eleventh century were not yet to be found primarily within Europe. Hai ben Sherira Gaon (d. 1038), who penned an array of talmudic commen- taries in addition to his protean output of responsa and halakhic mono- graphs, was the last of the Geonim who flourished in Baghdad.2 The family 1 See Avraham Grossman, “Zik˙atah shel Yahadut Ashkenaz ‘el Erets Yisra’el,” Shalem 3 (1981), 57–92; Grossman, “When Did the Hegemony of Eretz Yisra’el Cease in Italy?” in E. Fleischer, M. A. Friedman, and Joel Kraemer, eds., Mas’at Mosheh: Studies in Jewish and Moslem Culture Presented to Moshe Gil [Hebrew] (Jerusalem, 1998), 143–57; Israel Ta- Shma’s review essays in K˙ ryat Sefer 56 (1981), 344–52, and Zion 61 (1996), 231–7; Ta-Shma, Kneset Mehkarim, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 'Like Iron to a Magnet': Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence David Sclar Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/380 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence By David Sclar A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 David Sclar All Rights Reserved This Manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Prof. Jane S. Gerber _______________ ____________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt _______________ ____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Prof. Francesca Bregoli _______________________________________ Prof. Elisheva Carlebach ________________________________________ Prof. Robert Seltzer ________________________________________ Prof. David Sorkin ________________________________________ Supervisory Committee iii Abstract “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence by David Sclar Advisor: Prof. Jane S. Gerber This dissertation is a biographical study of Moses Hayim Luzzatto (1707–1746 or 1747). It presents the social and religious context in which Luzzatto was variously celebrated as the leader of a kabbalistic-messianic confraternity in Padua, condemned as a deviant threat by rabbis in Venice and central and eastern Europe, and accepted by the Portuguese Jewish community after relocating to Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • A USER's MANUAL Part 1: How Is Halakhah Organized?
    TORAHLEADERSHIP.ORG RABBI ARYEH KLAPPER HALAKHAH: A USER’S MANUAL Part 1: How is Halakhah Organized? I. How is Halakhah Organized? 4 case studies a. Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, and gemara thereupon b. Support of the poor Peiah, Bava Batra, Matnot Aniyyim, Yoreh Deah) c. Conversion ?, Yevamot, Issurei Biah, Yoreh Deah) d. Mourning Moed Qattan, Shoftim, Yoreh Deiah) Mishnah Berakhot 1:1 From what time may one recite the Shema in the evening? From the hour that the kohanim enter to eat their terumah Until the end of the first watch, in the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer. The Sages say: Until midnight. Rabban Gamliel says: Until morning. It happened that his sons came from a wedding feast. They said to him: We have not yet recited the Shema. He said to them: If it has not yet morned, you are obligated to recite it. Babylonian Talmud Berakhot 2a What is the context of the Mishnah’s opening “From when”? Also, why does it teach about the evening first, rather than about the morning? The context is Scripture saying “when you lie down and when you arise” (Devarim 6:7, 11:9). what the Mishnah intends is: “The time of the Shema of lying-down – when is it?” Alternatively: The context is Creation, as Scripture writes “There was evening and there was morning”. Mishnah Berakhot 1:1 (continued) Not only this – rather, everything about which the Sages say until midnight – their mitzvah is until morning. The burning of fats and organs – their mitzvah is until morning. All sacrifices that must be eaten in a day – their mitzvah is until morning.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Kings 15-16
    Book of First Kings I Kings 15-16 The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly This section of 1 Kings gives a brief survey of the kings of Judah and Israel from 913 to 885 B.C. From this point through the rest of 1 Kings, a cross reference is used in introducing each new king of Judah and Israel. When each king begins his reign it is connected to the reigning king of the other kingdom. Eight of Judah’s kings were good, but most were bad kings. Four kings of Judah (Asa, Jehoshaphat, Hezekiah, and Josiah) led notable religious revivals at critical times to preserve the nation. All of Israel’s kings were bad, but some were worse than others. Two Kings of Judah (15:1-24) – One bad king and one good king 1. King Abijam (15:1-8) – He reigned over Judah 3 years (913-911 B.C.). Two bad things are said about him: A. He walked in the sins for his father – Like father, like son. B. He was not devoted to the Lord – He was not loyal to God (“his heart was not perfect”) as David had been. The same thing was said about Solomon (11:4). David was mostly faithful to God except in the matter of Uriah. He took Uriah’s wife and then he took Uriah’s life. For the most part, David did what was right in the eyes of God. Proverbs 15:3 The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good.
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Contexts Ļ
    Chapter 1 Ļ Life and Contexts ļ n a letter that he sent to the Cretan scholar Saul Hako- I hen Ashkenazi a few years prior to his death, Isaac Abar- banel observed that he had written all of his “commen- taries and compilations” after I left my homeland (’eresខ moladeti); for all of the days that I was in the courts and palaces of kings occupied in their service I had no time to study and looked at no book but squandered my days in vanity and years in futile pursuit so that wealth and honor would be mine; yet the wealth was lost by evil adventure and “honor is departed from Israel” [1 Sam. 4:21]. Only after wandering to and fro over the earth from one kingdom to another . did I “seek out the book of the Lord” [Isa. 34:16].1 This personal retrospective, stark even after allowances are made for its imprecision and an autobiographical topos that it reflects,2 alludes to major foci of Abarbanel’s life. He engaged in large-scale commercial and financial en- deavors. He held positions at three leading European courts. He was a broad scholar who authored a multifaceted literary corpus comprising a variety of full- bodied exegetical tomes and theological tracts. And during roughly the last third of his life, in consequence of Spain’s expulsion of its Jews in 1492, his existence was characterized by itinerancy, often in isolation from family and scholarly peers. Situate these themes and their cognates on a wider historical, cultural, and intellectual canvas, and the result is a rich tableau at the center of which stands an ambitious seeker of power, prestige, and wealth who ar- dently cultivated the intellectual life and its vocations as exegete, theologian, and writer.
    [Show full text]
  • IN Divided Kingdom History
    SIMPLE, STIMULATING STUDIES IN Divided Kingdom History a Beersheba SIMPLE, STIMULATING STUDIES IN Divided Kingdom History BY DONALD G. HUNT --SEE PAGES 94-104 FOR ASSIGNMENTS-- Voice of Evangelism Box 43 1 Ottumwa, Iowa 52501 U.S.A. Table of Contents PART ONE ........ ................................. Solomon's Glorious Kingdom: His Beginning , , ............ ...... .._.. Solomon's Glorious Kingdom: His Many Enteipr Solomon's Glorious Kingdom: Testimonies to It ...... ,, , *. , , ..-. Solomon's Glorious Kingdom to be Divided .......... The Once-Glorious Kingdom is Divided Tabular View of the Divided Kingdom ....................................... .,_ ..................... 10 PART TWO ............................................ ............... Jeroboam's Notorious Departures ............... ......... ........ A Young Prophet Appears on the Scene . .................................. The Young Prophet Me The Arrogant Jeroboa ..................... 16 God Delivers Bad News to Jeroboam .......................... ..............17 Rehoboam's First Three Years are Prosperous ......................... Rehoboam Foolishly Judah's Wealth is ............... ........ The Wicked Baasha's House Will be Wiped out Also .... ................... ..................................................... ......................... 22 Zimri Touches off a Turbulent Time in Israel ......................... Oinri Leaves His Mark ..............26 Elijah Prays for and Proclaims a Drought ................29 ..................... 33 ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Helicopters Against Guerrillas the Israeli Model
    JEMEAA - FEATURE The Use of Helicopters against Guerrillas The Israeli Model DR. TAL TOVY ince its establishment, the State of Israel has been facing a bloody struggle against terrorism and guerrilla warfare, in addition to four conventional wars.1 The Israeli war against guerrilla fighters or terrorists began almost Simmediately after the War of Independence. Palestinian terrorists attempted to infiltrate Israel from the surrounding Arab countries and perform sabotage ac- tions near the border, which were little more than lines drawn on a map and proved wholly inadequate in stopping the infiltrations. After the 1967 war, most terrorists crossed over from Jordan. Following the “Black September” conflict in 1970 and up until 1982 (Operation Peace for Galilee), most terrorists infiltrated through the Lebanese border. In the 1980s and 1990s, Israel fought against the Shiite Amal Movement and Hezbollah organization in Lebanon. Since October 2000, Israel has struggled against widespread military uprisings in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. To counter these activities, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) uses various opera- tional methods. Special Forces have raided known terrorist bases and routine se- curity activities have been conducted along the borders and in the major cities. A third method has been targeting specific terrorist leaders or installations in the Middle East and in Europe. Most operations of the first and third categories are still classified. The IDF has launched a few large attacks targeting terrorist infra- structure—for example Karameh and Litany—with the most extensive one being the Lebanon War (1982), at least initially. In these large-scale operations, Israel has deployed massive infantry, armor, and artillery forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses: God's Representative, Employee, Or Messenger
    JSIJ 14 (2018) MOSES: GOD’S REPRESENTATIVE, EMPLOYEE, OR MESSENGER?UNDERSTANDING THE VIEWS OF MAIMONIDES, NAHMANIDES, AND JOSEPH ALBO ON MOSES’ ROLE AND ULTIMATE FAILURE AT MEI MERIBAH JONATHAN L. MILEVSKY* Introduction In his Shemonah Peraqim, Maimonides refers to Moses' sin in Numbers 20as one of the “misgivings of the Torah.”1In a digression from his discussion of virtues, Maimonides explains that the sin was unrelated to the extraction of water from the rock. Instead, it was the fact that Moses, whose deeds were scrutinized and mimicked by the Israelites, acted 1Maimonides, Shemonah Peraqim, chap. 5. There are numerous ancient and medieval Jewish perspectives on how Moses and Aaron erred at Mei meribah. For the various interpretations, see Jacob Milgrom, Numbers: JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990), 448.The wide variety of approaches can be attributed in part to a number of difficulties. These include the fact that it is a sin committed by the greatest of all prophets. Notice, for example how hesitant Shemuel Ben Meir is to describe Moses’ sin; making matters more difficult is the fact that Moses was not forgiven for what he did, as Joseph Albo points out, making the sin appear even more severe; also, the text bears some similarity to an incident described in the Bible in Exodus 17:6, which is why Joseph Bekhor Shor suggests that it is the same incident; further, the sin itself seems trivial. It hardly seems less miraculous for water to come from a rock when it is hit, than when it is spoken to, a point made by Nahmanides; finally, Moses pegs the sin on the Israelites in Deuteronomy 1:37.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies
    Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies Table of Contents Ancient Jewish History .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Medieval Jewish History ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Modern Jewish History ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Bible .................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Jewish Philosophy ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Talmud ................................................................................................................................................................ 29 Course Catalog | Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies 1 Ancient Jewish History JHI 5213 Second Temple Jewish Literature Dr. Joseph Angel Critical issues in the study of Second Temple literature, including biblical interpretations and commentaries, laws and rules of conduct, historiography, prayers, and apocalyptic visions. JHI 6233 Dead Sea Scrolls Dr. Lawrence Schiffman Reading of selected Hebrew and Aramaic texts from the Qumran library. The course will provide students with a deep
    [Show full text]
  • The 5 Towns Jewish Times
    $1.00 WWW.5TJT.COM VOL. 7 NO. 5 12 CHESHVAN 5767 lk lk ,arp NOVEMBER 3, 2006 INSIDE FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK THE LIGHT AT THE Thanks, Teeth BY LARRY GORDON 26 END OF THE TUNNEL Hannah Reich Berman Talking With Gourmet Glatt MindBiz Esther Mann, LMSW 30 Dean Skelos vs. The Vaad Kashrus Square Rooted Rabbi Yair Hoffman 52 State Senator Dean Skelos At this point, most readers are knows the Five Towns, Long aware that last Friday afternoon Aliyah Chronicle Island, and most of New York the Vaad HaKashrus of the Five Shmuel Katz 55 State better than just about Towns withdrew its certification anyone. Next week he is once of Gourmet Glatt Food IDF Death In Gaza again up for reelection, this Emporium in Cedarhurst. The Amos Harel 76 time against a dynamic Demo- letter delivered to Gourmet Glatt cratic challenger, Lawrence (see page 12) informs the owners resident Odelia Goldberg. of Gourmet Glatt that because of While the polls are pre- a violation of a clause in their Continued on Page 7 Continued on Page 10 WITHOUT HAPPINESS, WE’RE ALL ‘AT RISK’ PhotosByIraThomasCreations Mosholu Rebbe will be in the Five Towns next week. BY RABBI underlying problems, but See Page 50 Top: Rabbi Pesach Lerner delivering the daf shiur aboard the 7:49 a.m. SHAYA COHEN merely devastating symptoms Far Rockaway train to Penn Station. Standing next to him is Rabbi Eliezer of an inherent lack of happi- Cohen; seated are (aisle) Aryeh Markovich and (center) Rabbi Shmuel You’ve seen those aimless, ness—the common denomi- Bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • Daf Ditty Pesachim 78: Korban Pesach Today (?)
    Daf Ditty Pesachim 78: Korban Pesach today (?) Three girls in Israel were detained by the Israeli Police (2018). The girls are activists of the “Return to the Mount” (Chozrim Lahar) movement. Why were they detained? They had posted Arabic signs in the Muslim Quarter calling upon Muslims to leave the Temple Mount area until Friday night, in order to allow Jews to bring the Korban Pesach. This is the fourth time that activists of the movement will come to the Old City on Erev Pesach with goats that they plan to bring as the Korban Pesach. There is also an organization called the Temple Institute that actively is trying to bring back the Korban Pesach. It is, of course, very controversial and the issues lie at the heart of one of the most fascinating halachic debates in the past two centuries. 1 The previous mishnah was concerned with the offering of the paschal lamb when the people who were to slaughter it and/or eat it were in a state of ritual impurity. Our present mishnah is concerned with a paschal lamb which itself becomes ritually impure. Such a lamb may not be eaten. (However, we learned incidentally in our study of 5:3 that the blood that gushed from the lamb's throat at the moment of slaughter was collected in a bowl by an attendant priest and passed down the line so that it could be sprinkled on the altar). Our mishnah states that if the carcass became ritually defiled, even if the internal organs that were to be burned on the altar were intact and usable the animal was an invalid sacrifice, it could not be served at the Seder and the blood should not be sprinkled.
    [Show full text]