DOCSLIB.ORG

Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 managing flood risk We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Guildbourne House Chatsworth Road Worthing, West Sussex BN11 1LD Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Introduction I am pleased to introduce our summary of the Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP). This CFMP gives an overview of the flood risk in the Rother and Romney catchment and sets out our preferred plan for sustainable flood risk management over the next 50 to 100 years. The Rother and Romney CFMP is one of 77 CFMPs for The main source of flood risk in the Rother and Romney England and Wales. Through the CFMPs, we have CFMP area is from both river and tidal flooding and to a assessed inland flood risk across all of England and lesser extent surface and ground water flooding. The Wales for the first time. The CFMP considers all types of main areas at risk from tidal flooding are Rye, Hythe, inland flooding, from rivers, groundwater, surface Folkestone, Hamstreet, Robertsbridge and Etchingham. water and tidal flooding, but not flooding directly from We cannot reduce flood risk on our own, we will the sea (coastal flooding), which is covered by therefore work closely with all our partners to improve Shoreline Management Plans (SMPs). Our coverage of the co-ordination of flood risk activities and agree the surface and groundwater is however limited due to a most effective way to management flood risk in the lack of available information. future. The key partners we have worked with are Kent The role of CFMPs is to establish flood risk County Council, East Sussex County Council, Rother management policies which will deliver sustainable District Council, Shepway District Council, Ashford flood risk management for the long term. This is Borough Council, Romney Marsh Internal Drainage essential if we are to make the right investment Board, Natural England, English Heritage, Southern decisions for the future and to help prepare ourselves Water, National Farmers Union. effectively for the impact of climate change. We will This is a summary of the main CFMP document, if you use CFMPs to help us target our limited resources need to see the full document an electronic version where the risks are greatest. can be obtained by emailing This CFMP identifies flood risk management policies to [email protected] or alternatively assist all key decision makers in the catchment. It was paper copies can be viewed at any of our offices in produced through a wide consultation and appraisal Southern Region. process, however it is only the first step towards an integrated approach to flood risk management. As we all work together to achieve our objectives, we must monitor and listen to each others progress, discuss what has been achieved and consider where we may Toby Willison need to review parts of the CFMP. Regional Director, Southern Region Environment Agency Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan 3 Contents The purpose of a CFMP in managing flood risk 5 Catchment overview 6 Current and future flood risk 8 Future direction for flood risk management 11 Sub-areas 1 Robertsbridge and Etchingham 13 2 Hamstreet 15 3 Romney and Walland Marshes 16 4 Hythe and Folkestone 18 5 Rye 20 6 Rural Rother 21 Map of CFMP policies 23 4 Environment Agency Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan The purpose of a CFMP in managing flood risk CFMPs help us to understand the • IDBs, water companies and CFMPs aim to promote more scale and extent of flooding now other utilities to help plan their sustainable approaches to managing and in the future, and set policies activities in the wider context flood risk. The policies identified in for managing flood risk within the of the catchment; the CFMP will be delivered through a catchment. CFMPs should be used combination of different approaches. • Transportation planners; to inform planning and decision Together with our partners, we making by key stakeholders such as: • Land owners, farmers and will implement these approaches land managers that manage through a range of delivery plans, • The Environment Agency, who will and operate land for projects and actions. use the plan to guide decisions agriculture, conservation on investment in further plans, The relationship between the CFMP, and amenity purposes; projects or actions; delivery plans, strategies, projects • The public and businesses to and actions is shown in figure 1. • Regional planning bodies and enhance their understanding local authorities who can use the of flood risk and how it will plan to inform spatial planning be managed. activities and emergency planning; Figure 1. The relationship between CFMPs, delivery plans, projects and actions. Policy planning • CFMPs and Shoreline Management Plans. • Action plans define requirement for delivery plans, projects and actions. Policy delivery plans (see note) Projects and actions • Influence spatial planning to reduce risk • Make sure our spending delivers the best and restore floodplains. possible outcomes. • Prepare for and manage floods • Focus on risk based targets, for example (including local flood warning plans). numbers of households at risk. • Managing assets. • Water level management plans. • Land management and habitat creation. Note: Some plans may not be led by us – we may • Surface water management plans. identify the need and encourage their development. Environment Agency Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan 5 Catchment overview The CFMP area is situated in the through the towns of Robertsbridge The geology of the area consist of South East of England, covers and Etchingham. These towns have alluvium and marine silts in the approximately 970km2 with a experienced severe flooding since Rother and Walland Marshes with population of 175,000 people. the 1940s. The upper part of the Gault clay and Chalk in eastern There are a number of towns within catchment is mainly woodland and extremity of Romney Marsh. the CFMP area including Rye, grassland, but in some locations Hastings Beds in the High Weald Tenterden, Hythe, Dymchurch, Lydd, natural floodplains have been and shingle headland of Dungeness Robertsbridge and New Romney modified by farming and urban extending into the English Channel. with the major towns of Hastings development with the result of There are six sub-areas each with a and Folkestone at the edge of the increasing run-off to the lower part preferred policy that divide the CFMP area. of the catchment. The lower and catchment area; the Robertsbridge eastern part of the catchment and Etchingham, Hamstreet, Rye, The primary river system within the consists of a wide expanse of Rother and Walland Marshes, Hythe CFMP area is the River Rother along reclaimed coastal marshland which and Folkestone and Rural Rother. with its tributaries. The River Rother lies mostly below the spring tide rises near Mayfield in East Sussex level. and flows eastward extending ➜ View south of rural Rother near Udimore, Kent. 6 Environment Agency Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan Map 1. Overview map of Rother and Romney catchment. ‘The north and west of the Rother and Romney catchment is part of the High Weald, mainly woodland, grassland and natural floodplains, while the south and east are characterised by a wide expanse of reclaimed coastal marshland.’ Environment Agency Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan 7 Current and future flood risk Overview of the current Where is the risk? flood risk This map in page 10 illustrates the The areas with the highest Flood risk is the combination of the consequences of a 1% annual concentration of properties at risk probability flood event (1 in 100 probability of flooding and its from river flooding are tabulated year) occurring in the CFMP area. impact, that is, the chance of it on page 9. happening and the consequences if it does happen. We have assessed flood risk across the CFMP area Figure 2. Current and future (2100) flood risk to property from a 1% annual using broad-scale computer probability river flood, taking into account current flood defences. modelling, though making best use of existing knowledge and models 3000 where appropriate. Flood risk Current Future figures take into account current 2500 flood defences. 2000 The flood generation mechanism within the Rother and Romney CFMP 1500 area varies in relation to both the watercourse and the location within 1000 the catchment. Significant flooding Number of properties at flood risk at properties Number of 500 problems are associated with the urban areas of Robertsbridge, 0 Robertsbridge and Hamstreet Hythe and Rye Etchingham and Hamstreet. Etchingham Folkestone Robertsbridge has suffered ever increasing flooding since 1946. In the lower Rother catchment there are several minor tributaries and drains that can cause isolated flood incidents and the Romney and Walland Marshes are prone to both river and coastal flooding. ➜ High waters on the River Rother. 8 Environment Agency Rother and Romney Catchment Flood Management Plan How we currently Table 1. Locations of towns and villages with 25 or more properties at risk manage the risk in a 1% annual probability river flood. The area is very low lying and there Number of properties at risk Locations is a network of channels, drains, >1000 Rye, Hythe and Folkestone and structures which together with the Royal Military Canal combine to 500 to 1000 None drain the area for agricultural use.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Changes in Rye Bay
    CHANGES IN RYE BAY A REPORT OF THE INTERREG II PROJECT TWO BAYS, ONE ENVIRONMENT a shared biodiversity with a common focus THIS PROJECT IS BEING PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY European Regional Development Fund Dr. Barry Yates Patrick Triplet 2 Watch Cottages SMACOPI Winchelsea DECEMBER 2000 1,place de l’Amiral Courbet East Sussex 80100 Abbeville TN36 4LU Picarde e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Changes in Rye Bay Contents Introduction 2 Location 3 Geography 4 Changes in Sea Level 5 A Timeline of Rye Bay 270 million - 1 million years before present (BP ) 6 450,000-25,000 years BP 6 25,000 – 10,000 years BP 6 10,000 – 5,000 years BP 6 5,000 - 2,000 years BP 7 1st – 5th Century 8 6th – 10th Century 8 11th Century 8 12th Century 8 13th Century 9 14th Century 11 15th Century 12 16th Century 12 17th Century 13 18th Century 15 19th Century 16 20th Century 18 The Future Government Policy 25 Climate Change 26 The Element Of Chance 27 Rye Bay Bibliography 28 Rye Bay Maps 32 2 Introduction This is a report of the Two Bays, One Environment project which encompasses areas in England and France, adjacent to, but separated by the English Channel or La Manche. The Baie de Somme (50 o09'N 1 o27'E) in Picardy, France, lies 90 km to the south east of Rye Bay (50 o56'N 0 o45'E) in East Sussex, England. Previous reports of this project are …… A Preliminary Comparison of the Species of Rye Bay and the Baie de Somme.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Rother District Council Environment Strategy PDF 291 KB
    Rother District Council Report to: Cabinet Date: 27 July 2020 Title: Consultation Report – Draft Rother District Council Environment Strategy Report of: Ben Hook – Head of Service, Acquisitions, Transformation and Regeneration Cabinet Member: Councillor Field Ward(s): All Purpose of Report: To report the results of the public consultation for the draft Environment Strategy, and the recommendations of the Climate Change Steering Group Officer Recommendation(s): Recommendation to COUNCIL: That the Rother Environment Strategy 2020-2030 be approved and adopted, subject to the inclusion of the items listed in paragraphs 14 and 15 of the report, identified through the consultation process and recommended by the Climate Change Steering Group. Introduction 1. At its meeting on 16 September 2019 (Minute C19/38 refers), full Council agreed the following resolution to: i. Declare a ‘climate emergency’. ii. Review and update urgently Rother District Council’s current carbon strategy. iii. Pledge to do what is within our powers, to make Rother District carbon neutral by 2030, taking into account both production and consumption emissions. iv. Call on the Government to provide any additional powers and resources necessary for Rother District to achieve the target of becoming carbon neutral by 2030, and to implement best practice methods to limit global warming to 1.5ºC. v. Request that Cabinet establishes a Steering Group to report to full Council within six months with an Action Plan, outlining how the Council will address this emergency. The Carbon Neutral 2030 Action Plan will detail the leadership role Rother District will take in promoting community, public, business and other Council partnerships to achieve this commitment throughout the District.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1
    STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT – LEVEL 1 August 2008 ROTHER DISTRICT COUNCIL Contents: Page No. 1. Introduction, including Geology, Climate Change, SUDS, Sequential 5 Test, Exception Test and Emergency Planning 23 2. Methodology, including Approach 3. Flood Risk Assessment (attached) 30 3.1 Tidal Flooding 32 3.2 Fluvial Flooding 36 3.3 Surface Water Drainage Flooding 44 3.4 Highway Flooding 45 3.5 Sewerage Flooding 46 3.6 Reservoirs 47 4. Recommendation for SFRA Level 2 and Interim draft Policy guidance 48 for development in different flood zones Appendices: 1. Map showing Rother District, with Flood Zone 2 (2007) 51 2. Plans showing areas of development that are affected by flood risk 52 areas 3 Map showing SMP – Policy Unit Areas 53 4. Map showing Problem Drainage Areas in Rother District () 54 5. Key Maps showing:- EA Flood Zone 2 (2007 55 EA Flood Zone 3 (2007) EA Flood Map Historic (2006)s EA Flood Defences Benefit Areas (2007) EA Flood Defences (2007) EA Banktop E Planning EA Main Rivers Map SW Sewer Inverts SW Sewer Lines SW Sewer Points 6. Sewerage Flooding Incidents (Southern Water) over past 10 years 56 (Schedule attached) 7. Local Plan Policies that will need to be reconsidered in light of the 57 SFRA 8. Schedule of the locations most prone to Highway Flooding in Rother 59 District 2 9. Emergency Planning Officers Plan 63 10. Plan showing locations most prone to Highway Flooding in Rother 76 District 11. Location of sewerage flooding incidents (Southern Water) over past 77 10 years (Map) 12. The Sequential Test 78 3 References: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • PARISH COUNCIL of PLAYDEN, EAST SUSSEX ______Clerk: Lesley Voice, C/O 1 the Grove, Rye, TN31 7ND
    PARISH COUNCIL OF PLAYDEN, EAST SUSSEX ____________________________________________________________________ Clerk: Lesley Voice, C/O 1 The Grove, Rye, TN31 7ND. Tel: 07767 221704 Minutes of the Council Meeting held remotely by Zoom and telephone on 4th February 2021 at 7.30 p.m. Present: Councillors:, Mr P Osborne (PO) Chairman, Mr T Lenihan (TL) Vice Chairman, Mr A. Dickinson (AD), Mr D Stone (DS). East Sussex County Councillor: Cllr Keith Glazier Rother District Councillor: Not present Members of the Public: 4 Item Action 1 To accept apologies for absence: Sally-Ann Hart (S-A H) (Rother District Council). Now Member of Parliament for Hastings and Rye. 2 Declarations of interest on items on the agenda: None 3 To approve the minutes of the Parish Council Meeting on 7th January 2021: The minutes were unanimously approved and will be signed later by PO. 4 PCSO Orla Lindsey. Orla attended the meeting to introduce herself to the parish councillors and the public present. She is based in Battle and covers Rye and the surrounding area. TL commented that since D Bevan left the local community police had not been visible around Rye and asked if we would now see more of the PCSOs in Rye and the villages. She said that the PCSOs as a group aim to work together with the village communities and she would be coming to the area. The Clerk to send out Orla’s email to Clerk. the councillors after the meeting. 5 Reports from visiting Councillors: East Sussex County Councillor: Cllr Keith Glazier. Keith reported that the decision on the increase of Council Tax will be taken on the following Tuesday.
    [Show full text]
  • East Sussex Fire Authority Our Corporate Plan 2019-2020 Alternative Formats and Translation Contents Introduction
    We make our communities safer East Sussex Fire Authority Our Corporate Plan 2019-2020 Alternative formats and translation Contents Introduction...........................................................................................................................2 The Fire Authority...................................................................................................................4 The Members of the Fire Authority are:.................................................................................5 About East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service........................................................................6 Service Structure...................................................................................................................8 Setting the strategic direction.................................................................................................9 Our Strategies.....................................................................................................................10 Our priorities........................................................................................................................10 Delivering our purpose and commitments...........................................................................11 What we’ve achieved and our plans for this year................................................................12 Celebrating staff success.....................................................................................................26 Asking the public..................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by the Northern Parish Councils of Rother District Council and Burwash: Save Our Fields (The Joint Group) [FPS 143]
    Written evidence submitted by the northern parish councils of Rother District Council and Burwash: Save our Fields (the Joint group) [FPS 143] Introduction 1) The members of the Joint group are: a) Councillors from Brightling Parish Council, Burwash Parish Council, Etchingham Parish Council, Salehurst and Robertsbridge Parish Council, and Ticehurst Parish Council b) Our County councillor c) Two of the local Rother District councillors d) Members of Burwash: Save our Fields 2) Burwash: Save our Fields was set up in 2014. Details of the group can be found at www.burwashsaveourfields.org.uk/. Since 2014, the group has been involved in about 12 planning applications, issues and planning appeals and it has seen its arguments accepted in all of them. 3) The Joint group was set up this year to co-ordinate a response to government planning proposals. 4) Areas the Joint group can assist you with: a) Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) 83% of Rother District Council is in an AONB. Over 90% of Rother District Council is in a protected area, the AONB, Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), RAMSAR sites etc., see para 28. b) Rural issues The parishes are rural parishes. Planning is primarily urban-centric. Rural issues in planning are some of the most intractable. c) Local perspective Parishes and local groups are able to assess how planning works for the public. They have an independent focus about their impact on villages which statistics rarely provide. Unlike some witnesses, our overriding consideration is the public interest. All but one of the parishes have recently been involved in drafting a Neighbourhood plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy
    Mm m ‘surface water flooding- Dec 13’ Rother Local Plan Core Strategy Adopted 29 th September 2014 www.rother.gov.uk/corestrategy Rother District Council Town Hall, Bexhill-on-Sea TN39 3JX 01424 787000 www.rother.gov.uk 2 Rother District Council Rother Local Plan Core Strategy Adopted September 2014 Contents Part I – Introduction and Context 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 7 2. Policy Context ...................................................................................................... 9 3. ‘Portrait’ of Rother District .................................................................................. 11 4. Main Issues .......................................................................................................... 17 Part II – Vision and Objectives 5. Spatial Vision ....................................................................................................... 23 6. Strategic Objectives ............................................................................................ 25 Part III – Spatial Strategies 7. Overall Spatial Strategy ...................................................................................... 29 8. Bexhill .................................................................................................................. 45 9. Hastings Fringes .................................................................................................. 57 10. Rye and Rye Harbour .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NRA Southern 9
    NRA Southern 9 NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region June 1994 E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 099845 O National Rivers Authority 1994. First published June 1994. All reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or otherwise transmitted, i photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior p 'thority For further information, pi Public Relations Dep National Rivers Aut Guildbourne Ho h O; ilC0 Chatsworth Ro Worthing West Sussex CtO ii : , D _____ BN U 1LD Designed by GSBA and printed on Seque The NRA is committted to the principles o f stewardship and $«>.— ------------■« ; . Accession No f t f c C . P / . responsibilities as Guardians o f the Water Environment, the NRA will aim to establish and demt 3 environmental practice throughout all its functions. INTRODUCTION The NRA has specific responsibilities relating to Navigation together with those for Recreation, Conservation, Fisheries, Water Quality, Flood Defence and Water Resources. The aim of the N RA in respect of Navigation is to improve and maintain controlled waters and their facilities for use by the public where the NRA is the navigation authority. It is this aim which underpins the N R A ’s management of the Fiarbour of Rye. The Fiarbour of Rye Management Plan sets out the NRA’s future plans for the management of the Harbour, pursuing a policy of integrated management through balancing the needs of all the Harbour users. The Plan covers the period 1994/95 to 1997/98 and the area it covers is shown on the map.
    [Show full text]
  • Poplin Marsh, Eastbourne Romano-British Ceramic Building Material (CBM) – Site Number 1992.1 (Unpublished)
    CERAMIC BUILDING MATERIAL AND POTTERY REPORT ELFWICK FIELD SMALLHYTHE PLACE SMALLHYTHE ROAD TENTERDEN KENT TN30 7NG National Grid Reference Centred on: TQ 8927 3001 Report by Kevin and Lynn Cornwell Joint Field Officers Hastings Area Archaeological Research Group Registered Charity No. 294989 May 2020 1 Cover Photograph – A selection of Romano-British ceramic building material from Elfwick Field, Smallhythe Place, Smallhythe, Tenterden, Kent – photograph by Kevin Cornwell. Introduction Members of Hastings Area Archaeological Research Group conducted geophysical surveys at Smallhythe Place, Smallhythe Road, Tenterden, Kent between July 2019 – January 2020 (Cornwell & Cornwell 2020). During the field work artefacts were identified at two locations in Elfwick Field (site ‘A’ centred on NGR TQ 89274 30019 & site ‘B’ TQ 89250 29909). Nathalie Cohen, National Trust Archaeologist for London and the South East was alerted and the authors of this report were invited to comment on the archive. The Romano-British Ceramic Building Material (CBM) has been compared with previous analyses undertaken by Hastings Area Archaeological Research Group on archives from Castle Croft, Ninfield (Cornwell et al Summer 2007), Kitchenham Farm, Ashburnham (Cornwell et al Winter 2007; Cornwell & Cornwell Summer 2008), Chitcombe Farm, Brede (report forthcoming), Eight Acre Field, Crockers, Northiam (report forthcoming), Fagg Farm, Udimore (Cornwell & Cornwell 2016), Poplin Marsh, Eastbourne (Cornwell 2016) and Old House Farm, Ringmer (Cornwell 2018). The material has been divided into identifiable categories which include tegulae, imbrices, box-flue, flat tile/brick groups, here referred to as flat tiles. These have been sub-divided and the details commented on. A percentage of the material is abraded and cannot to be categorized as is common on many sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Spaces Protection Order (No1a)
    Rother District Council Report to: Cabinet Date: 5 October 2020 Title: Public Spaces Protection Order (No1A) Report of: Richard Parker-Harding, Head of Service Environmental Services, Licensing and Community Safety Cabinet Member: Councillor Field Ward(s): All Purpose of Report: To recommend the making of a Public Spaces Protection Order to control dogs Decision Type: Key Officer Recommendation(s): It be RESOLVED: That following consultation with the East Sussex County Council, Police, Police and Crime Commissioner a Public Spaces Protection Order be made. Introduction 1. In 2016, the Council approved making a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) (No 1) to control dogs (Minute CB16/14 refers). This Order expires in January 2021. In June Cabinet authorised consultation with Town and Parish Councils (Minute CB20/09 refers). Two Parish Councils requested the Order be amended and public consultation on these amendments has been undertaken. 2. The current Order was first adopted in June 2008 (Minute CB08/13 refers) following extensive consultation with Parish and Town Councils and the public. Several iterations to the Order were considered prior to adoption, whereby it was felt a reasonable compromise had been achieved between the requirements of the public and the needs of dog owners. Iden Parish Council and Ewhurst Parish Council have proposed amendments. The Order with the proposed amendments is set out at Appendix A. Background to PSPOs can be found at Appendix C. Options 3. To approve the making of an amended Order, considering the proposals of the Parish Councils and the two objections to the amendments from Iden residents. Alternatively, to renew the existing Order for a further 3 years without any amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Channel, Rye, East Sussex on Behalf of Martello Developments
    HERITAGE STATEMENT in connection with ROCK CHANNEL RYE EAST SUSSEX on behalf of Martello Developments Ref: DGC21910 Date of Issue: 8th March 2019 Web: www.dgc-onsultants.com Heritage and Significance Statement: Rock Channel, Rye, East Sussex On behalf of Martello Developments Table of Contents 1.0 Overview and Summary ...................................................................................3 2.0 Heritage Policy and Guidance Summary .......................................................3 3.0 Methodology ......................................................................................................9 4.0 Statement of Significance ............................................................................. 10 5.0 Historic Overview ........................................................................................... 11 6.0 Significance Assessment .............................................................................. 22 7.0 Proposals ........................................................................................................ 40 8.0 Impact .............................................................................................................. 42 9.0 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 44 All Rights reserved. Copyright © DGC (Historic Buildings Consultants Limited While Copyright in this volume document report as a whole is vested in DGC (Historic Buildings) Consultants LTD, copyright to individual contributions regarding
    [Show full text]
  • Rother District Council Election Results 1973-2011
    Rother District Council Election Results 1973-2011 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]