DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2109.00655V1 [Math.CO] 2 Sep 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2109.00655V1 [Math.CO] 2 Sep 2021 REGULAR POLYTOPES, SPHERE PACKINGS AND APOLLONIAN SECTIONS IVAN´ RASSKIN Abstract. In this paper we explore the connection between polytopes and sphere packings. After introducing the notion of Apollonian section, we prove our main result, that every integral tetrahedral, octahedral or cubical Apollonian circle packing is contained as an Apollonian section of an integral or- thoplicial Apollonian section. This result implies that the set of curvatures in every integral tetrahedral, octahedral or cubical Apollonian circle packing is contained in the set of curvatures of an integral ortho- plicial Apollonian sphere packing. We also prove that cross polytopes in dimension ≥ 3 and the 24-cell are M¨obiusunique, we give a new set of non edge-scribable 4-polytopes and we obtain a generalization of the octahedral Descartes' Theorem of Guettler and Mallows in every dimension. 1. Introduction Sphere packings appear diversely in chemistry, physics and mathematics in crystal structures, granu- lar systems or number theory [UN18; Gaj+21; FSZ19]. There is a long trajectory on the numerical and analytic approaches, but many questions about the algebraic and combinatorial aspects of non-congruent sphere packings are still open. This work is a continuation of [RR21a] where Ram´ırezAlfons´ınand the author introduced a polytopal approach to investigate d-dimensional sphere packings. This yielded, in particular, to a number of results on generalizations of Apollonian circle packings and Descartes' The- orem based on the Platonic solids. Here, we focus our attention to the third dimensional analogue by investigating the connection between sphere packings and the 4-dimensional regular polytopes. A particular case of sphere packing based on a regular 4-polytope was given by Nakamura and Dias in two independent works [Nak14; Dia14]. Nakamura called the construction the orthoplicial Apollonian sphere packing and is obtained as follows. Consider a packing of 8 spheres whose tangency graph is the 1-skeleton of an orthoplex. For each subset of four pairwise tangent spheres, there is a unique dual sphere orthogonal to the four. Invert the whole configuration trough every dual sphere, and then repeating this process infinitely (see Figure 1). Nakamura and Dias used the orthoplicial Apollonian sphere packing to prove the corresponding analogue of the local-to-global principle of tetrahedral Apollonian circle packings, conjectured by Graham, Lagarias, Mallow, Wilks and Yan in [Gra+03]. The original conjecture states that for every integral tetrahedral Apollonian packing, every integer large enough satisfying a certain modulo conditions, appears as a curvature. Nowadays, this conjecture is still open [FSZ19]. arXiv:2109.00655v1 [math.CO] 2 Sep 2021 Figure 1. The orthoplicial Apollonian sphere packing at 0, 1 and 2 iterations. Each color represents an orbit. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 51M20, 05B40, 52C17. Key words and phrases. Sphere packings, Apollonian packings, Descartes' Theorem, Polytopes, Number theory. 1 Cross sections are a natural way to study Apollonian configurations in high dimensions [Bar18]. In order to recognize planar structures in sphere packings, not only geometrically but also arithmetically, we shall present an algebraic generalization of cross sections of Apollonian clusters that we call Apollonian sections. Through this notion we shall prove the following theorem, which implies that the curvatures in every integral tetrahedral, octahedral or cubical Apollonian packing are contained in an integral orthoplicial Apollonian packing (see Figures 2, 15 and 16). Theorem 1. Let Ω(BP ) be either a tetrahedral, an octahedral or a cubical Apollonian packing. There is an orthoplicial Apollonian packing Ω(BO4 ) containing an Apollonian section arithmetically equivalent to Ω(BP ). Moreover, Ω(BP ) is integral if and only if Ω(BO4 ) is integral. -3 Figure 2. (Left) An integral tetrahedral Apollonian circle packing Ω(BT 3 ), (center) an integral orthoplicial Apollonian sphere packing Ω(BO4 ), (right) an Apollonian section of Ω(BO4 ) arithmetically equivalent to Ω(BT 3 ). 1.1. Main results. In addition to Theorem 1, our main contributions are the following: (i) New representations of the regular 4-polytopes called Centered Ball Packing projections (Figures 3 and 4). (ii) We prove that cross polytopes in dimension ≥ 3 as well as the 24-cell are M¨obiusunique (Theorem 2 and Proposition 2.2). (iii) We present a new set of non edge-scribable 4-polytopes (Proposition 2.3). (iv) We obtain a generalization of the octahedral Descartes' Theorem of Guettler and Mallows in every higher dimension (Corollary 2.3). (v) We relate integral polytopal d-ball packings based on the (d + 1)-simplex, (d + 1)-cross polytope and (d + 1)-cube to integers solutions of three diaphontine equations (Corollary 2.5). 1.2. Organization of the paper. In Section 2, after recalling the main tools introduced in [RR21a], we show the Centered Ball Packing projections of the regular 4-polytopes. Then, we extend the results on M¨obiusunicity for the family of cross polytopes in dimension 3 and above and the 24-cell. We briefly discuss the M¨obiusspectra of regular polytopes and use the M¨obiusunicity of the orthoplex, cube and 24-cell to obtain a class of 4-polytopes which are not edge-scribable. After that, we restate the polytopal generalization of Descartes' Theorem given in [RR21a] in terms of quadratic forms. Through this new approach, we obtain analogues of the equation of Descartes' Theorem for the family of the simplex, cross polytopes and hypercubes in every dimension, that turns out to be useful to find primitive solutions to three different diophantine equations. In Section 3, we show that the Nakamura's definition of orthoplicial sphere packings are in fact polytopal. We then discuss some aspect concerning the duality of orthoplicial sphere packings and we introduce the notion of orthoplicial trinity. Then, we compute the symmetrized Apollonian group and use it to give an alternative matrix representation of the orthoplicial Apollonian group. Finally, in Section 4, we focus our attention to integral packings. After introducing the notion of Apollonian sections of Apollonian clusters we prove the main theorem. We end with some conjectures and concluding remarks. 2 2. Preliminaries on polytopal d-ball packings. The construction given in [RR21a] to obtain d-ball packings from (d + 1)-polytopes is described as follows. Take a (d+1)-polytope P whose vertices lie outside the unit sphere of the Euclidean space Ed+1. Then, put at each vertex of P a \light source" illuminating the sphere. By projecting stereoreographi- cally the illuminated areas, one obtains a d-ball arrangement in Rcd called the ball-arrangement projection of P, denoted by B(P). If P is edge-scribed, that is, with every edge tangent to the sphere, then B(P) is d-ball packing. In this case, every d-ball packing BP equivalent to B(P) under M¨obiustransformations is said to be polytopal and P is called the tangency polytope of BP . The tangency graph of BP corresponds to the 1-skeleton of P [Che16]. We notice that there are d-ball packings which are not polytopal [RR21a]. One of the main features of polytopal d-ball packings is that they admit a consistent definition of duality in every dimension, contrarily to d-ball packings where the combinatorics is given by a graph or a simplicial complex. If µ is the M^obiustransformation sending B(P) to BP , then the dual of BP , ∗ ∗ ∗ denoted by BP , is given by µ(B(P )) where P denotes the polar of P. Duality is then needed to general- ize the Apollonian group and its variants to every polytopal d-ball packing (see [RR21a] for more details). We say that a polytopal d-ball packing is regular if its tangency polytope is regular. Let us recall the list of regular polytopes in every dimension. All 2-polytopes (polygons) admits a regular realization. The Platonic solids, namely, the tetrahedron T 3, the octahedron O3, the cube C3, the icosahedron I3 and the dodecahedron D3 are the five regular 3-polytopes (polyhedra). The 4-simplex T 4, the orthoplex O4, the hypercube C4, the 600-cell I4 and the 120-cell D4 are five regular 4-polytopes which can be thought as a 4-dimensional analogue of the Platonic solids. The remaining regular 4-polytope, the 24-cell R4 (the notation is not standard), completes the list of regular 4-polytopes. For every d ≥ 2, we shall denote by T d+1, Od+1 and Cd+1 the (d + 1)-dimensional simplex, octahedron and cube. It is well-known that in dimension 5 or above, these three families are the only regular polytopes [Cox73]. The following table contains all the information needed for the paper about the regular (d + 1)-polytopes for d ≥ 1. d Name Notation Schl¨aflisymbol Eigenvalues Multiplicities Midsphere ratio d = 1 p-gone (p ≥ 3) - fpg Not M¨obius unique for p > 3 tan(π=p) f3;:::; 3; 3g −d 1 q d ≥ 1 (d + 1)-Simplex T d+1 d+2 | {z } d d−1 2 d + 1 −2(d + 1) 1 d+1 f3;:::; 3; 4g (d + 1)-Cross polytope O | {z } d + 1 14 d−1 0 d d ≥ 2 −2d+1d 1 d+1 f4; 3;:::; 3g d+1 −1=2 (d + 1)-Cube C | {z } 2 d + 1 d d−1 0 2d+1 − d − 2 −12'2 1 Icosahedron I3 f3; 5g 4('2 + 1) 3 '−1 0 8 d = 2 −20'4 1 Dodecahedron D3 f5; 3g 20'2 3 '−2 0 16 −72 1 24-cell R4 f3; 4; 3g 24 4 3−1=2 0 19 d = 3 600-cell I4 f3; 3; 5g M¨obiusunique? 5−1=4'−3=2 120-cell D4 f5; 3; 3g M¨obiusunique? 3−1=2'−3 Table 1. Notations, M¨obiusspectra and midsphere ratio of regular (d + 1)-polytopes for d ≥ 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geometry of Generalized Permutohedra
    Geometry of Generalized Permutohedra by Jeffrey Samuel Doker A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Federico Ardila, Co-chair Lior Pachter, Co-chair Matthias Beck Bernd Sturmfels Lauren Williams Satish Rao Fall 2011 Geometry of Generalized Permutohedra Copyright 2011 by Jeffrey Samuel Doker 1 Abstract Geometry of Generalized Permutohedra by Jeffrey Samuel Doker Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Federico Ardila and Lior Pachter, Co-chairs We study generalized permutohedra and some of the geometric properties they exhibit. We decompose matroid polytopes (and several related polytopes) into signed Minkowski sums of simplices and compute their volumes. We define the associahedron and multiplihe- dron in terms of trees and show them to be generalized permutohedra. We also generalize the multiplihedron to a broader class of generalized permutohedra, and describe their face lattices, vertices, and volumes. A family of interesting polynomials that we call composition polynomials arises from the study of multiplihedra, and we analyze several of their surprising properties. Finally, we look at generalized permutohedra of different root systems and study the Minkowski sums of faces of the crosspolytope. i To Joe and Sue ii Contents List of Figures iii 1 Introduction 1 2 Matroid polytopes and their volumes 3 2.1 Introduction . .3 2.2 Matroid polytopes are generalized permutohedra . .4 2.3 The volume of a matroid polytope . .8 2.4 Independent set polytopes . 11 2.5 Truncation flag matroids . 14 3 Geometry and generalizations of multiplihedra 18 3.1 Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • The Geometry of Nim Arxiv:1109.6712V1 [Math.CO] 30
    The Geometry of Nim Kevin Gibbons Abstract We relate the Sierpinski triangle and the game of Nim. We begin by defining both a new high-dimensional analog of the Sierpinski triangle and a natural geometric interpretation of the losing positions in Nim, and then, in a new result, show that these are equivalent in each finite dimension. 0 Introduction The Sierpinski triangle (fig. 1) is one of the most recognizable figures in mathematics, and with good reason. It appears in everything from Pascal's Triangle to Conway's Game of Life. In fact, it has already been seen to be connected with the game of Nim, albeit in a very different manner than the one presented here [3]. A number of analogs have been discovered, such as the Menger sponge (fig. 2) and a three-dimensional version called a tetrix. We present, in the first section, a generalization in higher dimensions differing from the more typical simplex generalization. Rather, we define a discrete Sierpinski demihypercube, which in three dimensions coincides with the simplex generalization. In the second section, we briefly review Nim and the theory behind optimal play. As in all impartial games (games in which the possible moves depend only on the state of the game, and not on which of the two players is moving), all possible positions can be divided into two classes - those in which the next player to move can force a win, called N-positions, and those in which regardless of what the next player does the other player can force a win, called P -positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Has Not Been Formally Reviewed by the Lecturer
    6.896 Topics in Algorithmic Game Theory February 22, 2010 Lecture 6 Lecturer: Constantinos Daskalakis Scribe: Jason Biddle, Debmalya Panigrahi NOTE: The content of these notes has not been formally reviewed by the lecturer. It is recommended that they are read critically. In our last lecture, we proved Nash's Theorem using Broweur's Fixed Point Theorem. We also showed Brouwer's Theorem via Sperner's Lemma in 2-d using a limiting argument to go from the discrete combinatorial problem to the topological one. In this lecture, we present a multidimensional generalization of the proof from last time. Our proof differs from those typically found in the literature. In particular, we will insist that each step of the proof be constructive. Using constructive arguments, we shall be able to pin down the complexity-theoretic nature of the proof and make the steps algorithmic in subsequent lectures. In the first part of our lecture, we present a framework for the multidimensional generalization of Sperner's Lemma. A Canonical Triangulation of the Hypercube • A Legal Coloring Rule • In the second part, we formally state Sperner's Lemma in n dimensions and prove it using the following constructive steps: Colored Envelope Construction • Definition of the Walk • Identification of the Starting Simplex • Direction of the Walk • 1 Framework Recall that in the 2-dimensional case we had a square which was divided into triangles. We had also defined a legal coloring scheme for the triangle vertices lying on the boundary of the square. Now let us extend those concepts to higher dimensions. 1.1 Canonical Triangulation of the Hypercube We begin by introducing the n-simplex as the n-dimensional analog of the triangle in 2 dimensions as shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Package 'Hypercube'
    Package ‘hypercube’ February 28, 2020 Type Package Title Organizing Data in Hypercubes Version 0.2.1 Author Michael Scholz Maintainer Michael Scholz <[email protected]> Description Provides functions and methods for organizing data in hypercubes (i.e., a multi-dimensional cube). Cubes are generated from molten data frames. Each cube can be manipulated with five operations: rotation (change.dimensionOrder()), dicing and slicing (add.selection(), remove.selection()), drilling down (add.aggregation()), and rolling up (remove.aggregation()). License GPL-3 Encoding UTF-8 Depends R (>= 3.3.0), stats, plotly Imports methods, stringr, dplyr LazyData TRUE RoxygenNote 7.0.2 NeedsCompilation no Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2020-02-28 07:10:08 UTC R topics documented: hypercube-package . .2 add.aggregation . .3 add.selection . .4 as.data.frame.Cube . .5 change.dimensionOrder . .6 Cube-class . .7 Dimension-class . .7 generateCube . .8 importance . .9 1 2 hypercube-package plot,Cube-method . 10 print.Importances . 11 remove.aggregation . 12 remove.selection . 13 sales . 14 show,Cube-method . 14 show,Dimension-method . 15 sparsity . 16 summary . 17 Index 18 hypercube-package Provides functions and methods for organizing data in hypercubes Description This package provides methods for organizing data in a hypercube Each cube can be manipu- lated with five operations rotation (changeDimensionOrder), dicing and slicing (add.selection, re- move.selection), drilling down (add.aggregation), and rolling up (remove.aggregation). Details Package: hypercube
    [Show full text]
  • Steinitz's Theorem Project Report §1 Introduction §2 Basic Definitions
    Steinitz's Theorem Project Report Jon Hillery May 17, 2019 §1 Introduction Looking at the vertices and edges of polyhedra gives a family of graphs that we might expect has nice properties. It turns out that there is actually a very nice characterization of these graphs! We can use this characterization to find useful representations of certain graphs. §2 Basic Definitions We define a space to be convex if the line segment connecting any two points in the space remains entirely inside the space. This works for two-dimensional sets: and three-dimensional sets: Given a polyhedron, we define its 1-skeleton to be the graph formed from the vertices and edges of the polyhedron. For example, the 1-skeleton of a tetrahedron is K4: 1 Jon Hillery (May 17, 2019) Steinitz's Theorem Project Report Here are some further examples of the 1-skeleton of an icosahedron and a dodecahedron: §3 Properties of 1-Skeletons What properties do we know the 1-skeleton of a convex polyhedron must have? First, it must be planar. To see this, imagine moving your eye towards one of the faces until you are close enough that all of the other faces appear \inside" the face you are looking through, as shown here: This is always possible because the polyedron is convex, meaning intuitively it doesn't have any parts that \jut out". The graph formed from viewing in this way will have no intersections because the polyhedron is convex, so the straight-line rays our eyes see are not allowed to leave via an edge on the boundary of the polyhedron and then go back inside.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamiltonicity and Combinatorial Polyhedra
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY, Series B 31, 297-312 (1981) Hamiltonicity and Combinatorial Polyhedra D. NADDEF Laboratoire d’lnformatique et de Mathkmatiques AppliquPes de Grenoble. Grenoble, France AND W. R. PULLEYBLANK* Department of Computer Science, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N lN4, Canada Communicated by the Editors Received April 8, 1980 We say that a polyhedron with O-1 valued vertices is combinatorial if the midpoint of the line joining any pair of nonadjacent vertices is the midpoint of the line joining another pair of vertices. We show that the class of combinatorial polyhedra includes such well-known classes of polyhedra as matching polyhedra, matroid basis polyhedra, node packing or stable set polyhedra and permutation polyhedra. We show the graph of a combinatorial polyhedron is always either a hypercube (i.e., isomorphic to the convex hull of a k-dimension unit cube) or else is hamilton connected (every pair of nodes is the set of terminal nodes of a hamilton path). This imfilies several earlier results concerning special cases of combinatorial polyhedra. 1. INTRODUCTION The graph G(P) of a polyhedron P is the graph whose nodes are the vertices of the polyhedron and which has an edge joining each pair of nodes for which the corresponding vertices of the polyhedron are adjacent, that is, joined by an edge of the polyhedron. Such graphs have been studied since the beginnings of graph theory; in 1857 Sir William Hamilton introduced his “tour of the world” game which consisted of constructing a closed tour passing exactly once through each vertex of the dodecahedron.
    [Show full text]
  • Four-Dimensional Regular Polytopes
    faculty of science mathematics and applied and engineering mathematics Four-dimensional regular polytopes Bachelor’s Project Mathematics November 2020 Student: S.H.E. Kamps First supervisor: Prof.dr. J. Top Second assessor: P. Kiliçer, PhD Abstract Since Ancient times, Mathematicians have been interested in the study of convex, regular poly- hedra and their beautiful symmetries. These five polyhedra are also known as the Platonic Solids. In the 19th century, the four-dimensional analogues of the Platonic solids were described mathe- matically, adding one regular polytope to the collection with no analogue regular polyhedron. This thesis describes the six convex, regular polytopes in four-dimensional Euclidean space. The focus lies on deriving information about their cells, faces, edges and vertices. Besides that, the symmetry groups of the polytopes are touched upon. To better understand the notions of regularity and sym- metry in four dimensions, our journey begins in three-dimensional space. In this light, the thesis also works out the details of a proof of prof. dr. J. Top, showing there exist exactly five convex, regular polyhedra in three-dimensional space. Keywords: Regular convex 4-polytopes, Platonic solids, symmetry groups Acknowledgements I would like to thank prof. dr. J. Top for supervising this thesis online and adapting to the cir- cumstances of Covid-19. I also want to thank him for his patience, and all his useful comments in and outside my LATEX-file. Also many thanks to my second supervisor, dr. P. Kılıçer. Furthermore, I would like to thank Jeanne for all her hospitality and kindness to welcome me in her home during the process of writing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Polyhedra Through Time
    Fields Institute I. Hubard Polytopes, Maps and their Symmetries September 2011 Regular polyhedra through time The greeks were the first to study the symmetries of polyhedra. Euclid, in his Elements showed that there are only five regular solids (that can be seen in Figure 1). In this context, a polyhe- dron is regular if all its polygons are regular and equal, and you can find the same number of them at each vertex. Figure 1: Platonic Solids. It is until 1619 that Kepler finds other two regular polyhedra: the great dodecahedron and the great icosahedron (on Figure 2. To do so, he allows \false" vertices and intersection of the (convex) faces of the polyhedra at points that are not vertices of the polyhedron, just as the I. Hubard Polytopes, Maps and their Symmetries Page 1 Figure 2: Kepler polyhedra. 1619. pentagram allows intersection of edges at points that are not vertices of the polygon. In this way, the vertex-figure of these two polyhedra are pentagrams (see Figure 3). Figure 3: A regular convex pentagon and a pentagram, also regular! In 1809 Poinsot re-discover Kepler's polyhedra, and discovers its duals: the small stellated dodecahedron and the great stellated dodecahedron (that are shown in Figure 4). The faces of such duals are pentagrams, and are organized on a \convex" way around each vertex. Figure 4: The other two Kepler-Poinsot polyhedra. 1809. A couple of years later Cauchy showed that these are the only four regular \star" polyhedra. We note that the convex hull of the great dodecahedron, great icosahedron and small stellated dodecahedron is the icosahedron, while the convex hull of the great stellated dodecahedron is the dodecahedron.
    [Show full text]
  • NUMB3RS Activity Episode: “Rampage” Teacher Page 1
    NUMB3RS Activity Episode: “Rampage” Teacher Page 1 NUMB3RS Activity: Tesseract Episode: “Rampage” Topic: Tesseracts and Hypercubes Grade Level: 9 - 12 Objective: An investigation of the fourth dimension Time: 30 minutes Introduction In “Rampage,” Charlie and Amita discuss the idea of dimensions and refer to a tesseract, a four-dimensional cube. This activity explores the idea of dimension and introduces the tesseract. The terms tesseract and hypercube are used by some interchangeably, but the hypercube is the broader name for the objects of any dimension referred to in this activity, and the tesseract is the fourth-dimensional equivalent of a cube. A beginning discussion of dimension will be helpful for students who have only an intuitive understanding of dimension. Dimension can be thought of as degrees of freedom or movement. A one-dimensional space, which can be shown with a line or line segment, shows one movement which is along the line. A two-dimensional space allows movement in the plane. Think of the x-axis and y-axis as determining a plane. For example, a point has two coordinates, showing two movements, a vertical one and a horizontal one. To introduce the third dimension, or z-axis, draw the x- and y-axes on the board, and use a ruler starting at the origin and pointing out of the board. The movement of any point in three dimensions includes a horizontal (x), vertical (y), and an “outward” component (z). More formally, dimension is defined by www.Mathworld.com as “…a topological measure of the size of its covering properties.” Roughly speaking, it is the number of coordinates needed to specify a point on the object.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Dual Configurations and Regular Graphs
    SELF-DUAL CONFIGURATIONS AND REGULAR GRAPHS H. S. M. COXETER 1. Introduction. A configuration (mci ni) is a set of m points and n lines in a plane, with d of the points on each line and c of the lines through each point; thus cm = dn. Those permutations which pre­ serve incidences form a group, "the group of the configuration." If m — n, and consequently c = d, the group may include not only sym­ metries which permute the points among themselves but also reci­ procities which interchange points and lines in accordance with the principle of duality. The configuration is then "self-dual," and its symbol («<*, n<j) is conveniently abbreviated to na. We shall use the same symbol for the analogous concept of a configuration in three dimensions, consisting of n points lying by d's in n planes, d through each point. With any configuration we can associate a diagram called the Menger graph [13, p. 28],x in which the points are represented by dots or "nodes," two of which are joined by an arc or "branch" when­ ever the corresponding two points are on a line of the configuration. Unfortunately, however, it often happens that two different con­ figurations have the same Menger graph. The present address is concerned with another kind of diagram, which represents the con­ figuration uniquely. In this Levi graph [32, p. 5], we represent the points and lines (or planes) of the configuration by dots of two colors, say "red nodes" and "blue nodes," with the rule that two nodes differently colored are joined whenever the corresponding elements of the configuration are incident.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 BASIC PROPERTIES of CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨Urgenrichter-Gebert, and G¨Unterm
    15 BASIC PROPERTIES OF CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨urgenRichter-Gebert, and G¨unterM. Ziegler INTRODUCTION Convex polytopes are fundamental geometric objects that have been investigated since antiquity. The beauty of their theory is nowadays complemented by their im- portance for many other mathematical subjects, ranging from integration theory, algebraic topology, and algebraic geometry to linear and combinatorial optimiza- tion. In this chapter we try to give a short introduction, provide a sketch of \what polytopes look like" and \how they behave," with many explicit examples, and briefly state some main results (where further details are given in subsequent chap- ters of this Handbook). We concentrate on two main topics: • Combinatorial properties: faces (vertices, edges, . , facets) of polytopes and their relations, with special treatments of the classes of low-dimensional poly- topes and of polytopes \with few vertices;" • Geometric properties: volume and surface area, mixed volumes, and quer- massintegrals, including explicit formulas for the cases of the regular simplices, cubes, and cross-polytopes. We refer to Gr¨unbaum [Gr¨u67]for a comprehensive view of polytope theory, and to Ziegler [Zie95] respectively to Gruber [Gru07] and Schneider [Sch14] for detailed treatments of the combinatorial and of the convex geometric aspects of polytope theory. 15.1 COMBINATORIAL STRUCTURE GLOSSARY d V-polytope: The convex hull of a finite set X = fx1; : : : ; xng of points in R , n n X i X P = conv(X) := λix λ1; : : : ; λn ≥ 0; λi = 1 : i=1 i=1 H-polytope: The solution set of a finite system of linear inequalities, d T P = P (A; b) := x 2 R j ai x ≤ bi for 1 ≤ i ≤ m ; with the extra condition that the set of solutions is bounded, that is, such that m×d there is a constant N such that jjxjj ≤ N holds for all x 2 P .
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry and Arithmetic of Crystallographic Sphere Packings
    Geometry and arithmetic of crystallographic sphere packings Alex Kontorovicha,b,1 and Kei Nakamuraa aDepartment of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854; and bSchool of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540 Edited by Kenneth A. Ribet, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved November 21, 2018 (received for review December 12, 2017) We introduce the notion of a “crystallographic sphere packing,” argument leading to Theorem 3 comes from constructing circle defined to be one whose limit set is that of a geometrically packings “modeled on” combinatorial types of convex polyhedra, finite hyperbolic reflection group in one higher dimension. We as follows. exhibit an infinite family of conformally inequivalent crystallo- graphic packings with all radii being reciprocals of integers. We (~): Polyhedral Packings then prove a result in the opposite direction: the “superintegral” Let Π be the combinatorial type of a convex polyhedron. Equiv- ones exist only in finitely many “commensurability classes,” all in, alently, Π is a 3-connectedz planar graph. A version of the at most, 20 dimensions. Koebe–Andreev–Thurston Theorem§ says that there exists a 3 geometrization of Π (that is, a realization of its vertices in R with sphere packings j crystallographic j arithmetic j polyhedra j straight lines as edges and faces contained in Euclidean planes) Coxeter diagrams having a midsphere (meaning, a sphere tangent to all edges). This midsphere is then also simultaneously a midsphere for the he goal of this program is to understand the basic “nature” of dual polyhedron Πb. Fig. 2A shows the case of a cuboctahedron Tthe classical Apollonian gasket.
    [Show full text]