DOCSLIB.ORG

With David Eisenbud Interviewer: Toshitake Kohno

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
With David Eisenbud Interviewer: Toshitake Kohno IPMU Interview with David Eisenbud Interviewer: Toshitake Kohno Kohno: Professor Eisenbud, on the collaborations of it is a great pleasure for me to mathematicians with physicists, have this opportunity to talk astronomers, and scientists with you about the Institute for in other areas? What roles the Physics and Mathematics can mathematicians play in of the Universe. collaboration? As you might have seen on our web page, one of Mathematics and physics the main issues for us at our provide each other with institute is to create new sustenance research fields that go beyond Eisenbud: It’s an interesting traditional boundaries between question. It’s not so easy disciplines; especially between to organize collaborations, mathematics and physics. as I’m sure you know. The It is therefore essential that history is very interesting in mathematicians and physicists mathematics and physics, and get together for discussion in the other sciences, too. Very and work together. Could many of the great problems of you tell us your viewpoints mathematics have come from applications. Mathematics is deeply enriched by its contact with the applications. Many other very important ideas David Eisenbud is a professor of mathematics at the University in mathematics come from of California Berkeley and was , , pure imagination. Somehow, Director of the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute they’re just thought up by (MSRI) from 1997 to 2007. mathematicians because they He was President of the American Mathematical Society are curious about mathematical (AMS) from 2003 to 2005 . things. The surprising thing, I Eisenbud’s research interests include commutative algebra, think, is that both of these turn algebraic geometry, topology, out to be equally applicable and computational methods in these fields. He established the afterwards. So while there AMS Leonard Eisenbud Prize are these two very different for Mathematics and Physics in 2006 in memory of his father, sources, the way they look in Leonard Eisenbud (1913-2004) , applications is the same. an eminent mathematical physicist. The first prize was Riemannian geometry was awarded to Hirosi Ooguri, in some way an applied and Andrew Strominger, and Cumrun Vafa in January 2008. in some way a pure interest 22 IPMU News No. 1 March 2008 of Gauss and Riemann, and develop. Physicists are became the basis for relativity. extraordinary and voracious The noncommutative algebra consumers of these ideas. As of infinite dimensional matrices soon as they hear anything, became somehow the basis they quickly apply it, and of quantum mechanics. These it becomes high fashion in were completely unanticipated physics and very exciting. developments. I think that is In return, the mathematicians a pattern which will continue get problems which they in the future. The best guide cannot solve because we have to the future in this physicists are liable to do regard is the past. One can things with their mathematics learn some lessons from this. that mathematicians would One is that it is very never dream of doing. And the important for mathematics physicists are much better than to be exposed to and interact we are in computing things. with experimental and They make computations, theoretical science. I think and if the computations this kind of exposure is a are successful they know wonderful thing the new that what they did must be Institute can bring about. fundamentally correct. In That’s where some of many cases this is enough for the problems that enrich them, whereas for us it’s not mathematics will emerge. enough and we need to go on It’s also very important and develop the mathematics to maintain the strongest behind this. So I think it’s a possible purely disciplinary very fruitful time of interaction capability so that it can there. feed the interdisciplinary capability. You cannot have How to decipher mountains interdisciplinary science if you of data don’t have disciplinary science. That’s of course only one side And I think that this university of the interaction with physics has such a strong tradition in today. There’s another side to mathematics, that it is well it, and the situation is common placed for that. to the other sciences, as well. The current development Biology has led the way here, of mathematics and physics but it’s very much across is really very striking, because the board. That is, we are I think theoretical physics now capable, with electronic and mathematics are closer instruments and computers, together today than they of producing much more data have been for 100 years. The than we can handle. development of string theory and the very intense work in Interview quantum mechanics in our day Toshitake Kohno is a professor is highly dependent on the of mathematics at the University of Tokyo, and he is a principal tools that the mathematicians investigator of IPMU. 23 I remember the physicist Chance favors only the discussions. Then one of the working on physics circa 1950. Robert H. Dicke coming to prepared institute groups will have no chance We have really understood speak once at a colloquium Kohno: Research in statistics of getting into the ideas of the mathematics of the kind many, many years ago. He and experimental physics is the other group. I think it is of quantum mechanics that talked about measurements also an important aspect of very important to have an people were doing before of the oblateness of the sun. our institute. organized forum in which 1950, but the kind of quantum The sun is not perfectly round, You mentioned each group is supposed to talk mechanics that was done in and exactly how much it fails interdisciplinary research. to the other group. It’s quite the second half of the 20th to be round is important if you Let’s talk about this. As a hard for them to do, so unless century is still very hard for think about the verifications former director of MSRI, you you push hard they don’t do mathematicians to understand, of general relativity by the have organized a number it. But if they do it, then they and I think for physicists to bending of light around of activities in various fields are quite pleased afterwards, I understand, too. the sun. So he was very of mathematics. I was very think. So it’s worthwhile. The most accurate interested in this question of impressed by a program of There are various ways that predictions in all of physics, the oblateness of the sun. He MSRI in the mid-eighties. Two one can do social engineering. in some way, are those in collected data－at that time, very different programs, one Of course it’s important simply quantum electrodynamics. in those early days, it was still in topology and the other in that they meet each other, They are made by summing only a tiny, tiny fraction of operator algebras, started talk to each other, and know the first few terms of a what we do today－but the in parallel and then were each other’s names. This is series which is known to be data sat in his laboratory. Each unified to create a new field difficult enough. I think it’s divergent. This is not a happy day there would be a pile of of mathematics, the discovery also important to have series situation. Despite lots of work printouts. Who could read all of the Jones polynomial. In of elementary lectures by one I think this remains a difficult these things? your opinion, what makes group for the other group to problem. People in physics This is widely recognized interdisciplinary research make it possible for people to integrate over nonexistent as one of the fundamental possible at the Institute level? learn things they didn’t know spaces all the time perfectly problems of experimental Eisenbud: I have to say luck about already. Then there are happily, and I think the science today: our ability to plays a big role. Since you new ideas, and it’s exciting, absorption and understanding produce interesting data is can’t control luck, you have to and people talk to each other. of that material will be very far greater than our ability control the other things around “Oh yes! I have a tool that important for mathematics, to absorb and understand luck. The great biologist Louis might fit your problem.” And and ultimately for the progress it. The mathematicians are Pasteur said:“ Chance favors this then goes forward. of physics, as well. the only ones, I think, who the prepared mind.” In the Approaches to string On the other hand, the have the tools which will same sense, chance favors the theory problems of string theory begin to be effective in prepared institute. involve the deepest parts of this way, mainly through One thing that MSRI does Kohno: Recently there have mathematics. I think physicists statistics and combinatorics regularly is to bring programs been very close relationships, have made very good use and computer science. One together which are in some again, between geometry and of many surprising tools and sees this very much in the way related, in the hope that physics; for example, mirror results from mathematics, study of the genome and the this will make interaction more symmetry. Could you tell us and have often led the way. matching algorithms we have likely. Of course if you have about your prospect for future There’s a great interchange developed there. This bleeds very smart people working on developments in synergy between the two fields. I think over into computer science. related things and one group between mathematics and this is a very happy time for By the way, I think one should has the chance to learn from physics? mathematics and physics in regard computer science, the other, then this makes Eisenbud: I think the that regard.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Questions About Boij-S\" Oderberg Theory
    QUESTIONS ABOUT BOIJ–SODERBERG¨ THEORY DANIEL ERMAN AND STEVEN V SAM 1. Background on Boij–Soderberg¨ Theory Boij–S¨oderberg theory focuses on the properties and duality relationship between two types of numerical invariants. One side involves the Betti table of a graded free resolution over the polynomial ring. The other side involves the cohomology table of a coherent sheaf on projective space. The theory began with a conjectural description of the cone of Betti tables of finite length modules, given in [10]. Those conjectures were proven in [25], which also described the cone of cohomology tables of vector bundles and illustrated a sort of duality between Betti tables and cohomology tables. The theory itself has since expanded in many directions: allowing modules whose support has higher dimension, replacing vector bundles by coherent sheaves, working over rings other than the polynomial ring, and so on. But at its core, Boij–S¨oderberg theory involves: (1) A classification, up to scalar multiple, of the possible Betti tables of some class of objects (for example, free resolutions of finitely generated modules of dimension ≤ c). (2) A classification, up to scalar multiple, of the cohomology tables of some class of objects (for examples, coherent sheaves of dimension ≤ n − c). (3) Intersection theory-style duality results between Betti tables and cohomology tables. One motivation behind Boij and S¨oderberg’s conjectures was the observation that it would yield an immediate proof of the Cohen–Macaulay version of the Multiplicity Conjectures of Herzog–Huneke–Srinivasan [44]. Eisenbud and Schreyer’s [25] thus yielded an immediate proof of that conjecture, and the subsequent papers [11, 26] provided a proof of the Mul- tiplicity Conjecture for non-Cohen–Macaulay modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography [1] Emil Artin. Galois Theory. Dover, second edition, 1964. [2] Michael Artin. Algebra. Prentice Hall, first edition, 1991. [3] M. F. Atiyah and I. G. Macdonald. Introduction to Commutative Algebra. Addison Wesley, third edition, 1969. [4] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre, Chapitres 1-3.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Hermann, 1970. [5] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre, Chapitre 10.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Masson, 1980. [6] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre, Chapitres 4-7.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Masson, 1981. [7] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre Commutative, Chapitres 8-9.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Masson, 1983. [8] Nicolas Bourbaki. Elements of Mathematics. Commutative Algebra, Chapters 1-7. Springer–Verlag, 1989. [9] Henri Cartan and Samuel Eilenberg. Homological Algebra. Princeton Math. Series, No. 19. Princeton University Press, 1956. [10] Jean Dieudonn´e. Panorama des mat´ematiques pures. Le choix bourbachique. Gauthiers-Villars, second edition, 1979. [11] David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote. Abstract Algebra. Wiley, second edition, 1999. [12] Albert Einstein. Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K¨orper. Annalen der Physik, 17:891–921, 1905. [13] David Eisenbud. Commutative Algebra With A View Toward Algebraic Geometry. GTM No. 150. Springer–Verlag, first edition, 1995. [14] Jean-Pierre Escofier. Galois Theory. GTM No. 204. Springer Verlag, first edition, 2001. [15] Peter Freyd. Abelian Categories. An Introduction to the theory of functors. Harper and Row, first edition, 1964. [16] Sergei I. Gelfand and Yuri I. Manin. Homological Algebra. Springer, first edition, 1999. [17] Sergei I. Gelfand and Yuri I. Manin. Methods of Homological Algebra. Springer, second edition, 2003. [18] Roger Godement. Topologie Alg´ebrique et Th´eorie des Faisceaux.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geometry of Syzygies
    The Geometry of Syzygies A second course in Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry David Eisenbud University of California, Berkeley with the collaboration of Freddy Bonnin, Clement´ Caubel and Hel´ ene` Maugendre For a current version of this manuscript-in-progress, see www.msri.org/people/staff/de/ready.pdf Copyright David Eisenbud, 2002 ii Contents 0 Preface: Algebra and Geometry xi 0A What are syzygies? . xii 0B The Geometric Content of Syzygies . xiii 0C What does it mean to solve linear equations? . xiv 0D Experiment and Computation . xvi 0E What’s In This Book? . xvii 0F Prerequisites . xix 0G How did this book come about? . xix 0H Other Books . 1 0I Thanks . 1 0J Notation . 1 1 Free resolutions and Hilbert functions 3 1A Hilbert’s contributions . 3 1A.1 The generation of invariants . 3 1A.2 The study of syzygies . 5 1A.3 The Hilbert function becomes polynomial . 7 iii iv CONTENTS 1B Minimal free resolutions . 8 1B.1 Describing resolutions: Betti diagrams . 11 1B.2 Properties of the graded Betti numbers . 12 1B.3 The information in the Hilbert function . 13 1C Exercises . 14 2 First Examples of Free Resolutions 19 2A Monomial ideals and simplicial complexes . 19 2A.1 Syzygies of monomial ideals . 23 2A.2 Examples . 25 2A.3 Bounds on Betti numbers and proof of Hilbert’s Syzygy Theorem . 26 2B Geometry from syzygies: seven points in P3 .......... 29 2B.1 The Hilbert polynomial and function. 29 2B.2 . and other information in the resolution . 31 2C Exercises . 34 3 Points in P2 39 3A The ideal of a finite set of points .
    [Show full text]
  • Right Ideals of a Ring and Sublanguages of Science
    RIGHT IDEALS OF A RING AND SUBLANGUAGES OF SCIENCE Javier Arias Navarro Ph.D. In General Linguistics and Spanish Language http://www.javierarias.info/ Abstract Among Zellig Harris’s numerous contributions to linguistics his theory of the sublanguages of science probably ranks among the most underrated. However, not only has this theory led to some exhaustive and meaningful applications in the study of the grammar of immunology language and its changes over time, but it also illustrates the nature of mathematical relations between chunks or subsets of a grammar and the language as a whole. This becomes most clear when dealing with the connection between metalanguage and language, as well as when reflecting on operators. This paper tries to justify the claim that the sublanguages of science stand in a particular algebraic relation to the rest of the language they are embedded in, namely, that of right ideals in a ring. Keywords: Zellig Sabbetai Harris, Information Structure of Language, Sublanguages of Science, Ideal Numbers, Ernst Kummer, Ideals, Richard Dedekind, Ring Theory, Right Ideals, Emmy Noether, Order Theory, Marshall Harvey Stone. §1. Preliminary Word In recent work (Arias 2015)1 a line of research has been outlined in which the basic tenets underpinning the algebraic treatment of language are explored. The claim was there made that the concept of ideal in a ring could account for the structure of so- called sublanguages of science in a very precise way. The present text is based on that work, by exploring in some detail the consequences of such statement. §2. Introduction Zellig Harris (1909-1992) contributions to the field of linguistics were manifold and in many respects of utmost significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013
    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • MSRI Celebrates Its Twentieth Birthday, Volume 50, Number 3
    MSRI Celebrates Its Twentieth Birthday The past twenty years have seen a great prolifera- renewed support. Since then, the NSF has launched tion in mathematics institutes worldwide. An in- four more institutes: the Institute for Pure and spiration for many of them has been the Applied Mathematics at the University of California, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI), Los Angeles; the AIM Research Conference Center founded in Berkeley, California, in 1982. An es- at the American Institute of Mathematics (AIM) in tablished center for mathematical activity that Palo Alto, California; the Mathematical Biosciences draws researchers from all over the world, MSRI has Institute at the Ohio State University; and the distinguished itself for its programs in both pure Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences and applied areas and for its wide range of outreach Institute, which is a partnership of Duke University, activities. MSRI’s success has allowed it to attract North Carolina State University, the University of many donations toward financing the construc- North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the National tion of a new extension to its building. In October Institute of Statistical Sciences. 2002 MSRI celebrated its twentieth year with a Shiing-Shen Chern, Calvin C. Moore, and I. M. series of special events that exemplified what MSRI Singer, all on the mathematics faculty at the Uni- has become—a focal point for mathematical culture versity of California, Berkeley, initiated the original in all its forms, with the discovery and delight of proposal for MSRI; Chern served as the founding new mathematical knowledge the top priority. director, and Moore was the deputy director.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Reflections: Interview with David Eisenbud
    Presidential Reflections: Interview with David Eisenbud There is also the Committee on Committees, Every other year, when a new AMS president takes office, the which helps the president do this, because there Notices publishes interviews with the incoming and outgoing are something like 300 appointments a year that president. What follows is an edited version of an interview have to be made. My first act as president—really with David Eisenbud, whose two-year term as president ends as president-elect—was to gather together people on January 31, 2005. The interview was conducted in fall 2004 who I thought would be very well connected and by Notices senior writer and deputy editor Allyn Jackson. also who would reach into many different popu- Eisenbud is director of the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI) in Berkeley and professor of mathematics at lations of mathematicians. One of my ambitions was the University of California, Berkeley. to provide a diverse new group of committee mem- An interview with AMS president-elect James Arthur will bers—young people and people from the minority appear in the March 2005 issue of the Notices. community. I also tried hard to make sure that women are well represented on committees and slates for elections. And I am proud of what we did Notices: The president of the AMS has two types in that respect. That’s actually the largest part of of duties. One type consists of the things that he or the president’s job, in terms of just sheer time and she has to do, by virtue of the office.
    [Show full text]
  • FOCUS August/September 2005
    FOCUS August/September 2005 FOCUS is published by the Mathematical Association of America in January, February, March, April, May/June, FOCUS August/September, October, November, and Volume 25 Issue 6 December. Editor: Fernando Gouvêa, Colby College; [email protected] Inside Managing Editor: Carol Baxter, MAA 4 Saunders Mac Lane, 1909-2005 [email protected] By John MacDonald Senior Writer: Harry Waldman, MAA [email protected] 5 Encountering Saunders Mac Lane By David Eisenbud Please address advertising inquiries to: Rebecca Hall [email protected] 8George B. Dantzig 1914–2005 President: Carl C. Cowen By Don Albers First Vice-President: Barbara T. Faires, 11 Convergence: Mathematics, History, and Teaching Second Vice-President: Jean Bee Chan, An Invitation and Call for Papers Secretary: Martha J. Siegel, Associate By Victor Katz Secretary: James J. Tattersall, Treasurer: John W. Kenelly 12 What I Learned From…Project NExT By Dave Perkins Executive Director: Tina H. Straley 14 The Preparation of Mathematics Teachers: A British View Part II Associate Executive Director and Director By Peter Ruane of Publications: Donald J. Albers FOCUS Editorial Board: Rob Bradley; J. 18 So You Want to be a Teacher Kevin Colligan; Sharon Cutler Ross; Joe By Jacqueline Brennon Giles Gallian; Jackie Giles; Maeve McCarthy; Colm 19 U.S.A. Mathematical Olympiad Winners Honored Mulcahy; Peter Renz; Annie Selden; Hortensia Soto-Johnson; Ravi Vakil. 20 Math Youth Days at the Ballpark Letters to the editor should be addressed to By Gene Abrams Fernando Gouvêa, Colby College, Dept. of 22 The Fundamental Theorem of ________________ Mathematics, Waterville, ME 04901, or by email to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • David Eisenbud Professorship
    For Your Information wife, Marilyn, Simons manages the Simons Foundation, a News from MSRI charitable organization devoted to scientific research. The Simonses live in Manhattan. MSRI Receives Major Gift Simons is president of Renaissance Technologies James H. Simons, mathematician, philanthropist, and Corporation, a private investment firm dedicated to the one of the world’s most successful hedge fund manag- use of mathematical methods. Renaissance presently has ers, announced in May 2007 a US$10 million gift from over US$30 billion under management. Previously he was the Simons Foundation to the Mathematical Sciences Re- chairman of the mathematics department at the State Uni- search Institute (MSRI), the largest single cash pledge in versity of New York at Stony Brook. Earlier in his career he the institute’s twenty-five-year history. The new funding was a cryptanalyst at the Institute of Defense Analyses in is also the largest gift of endowment made to a U.S.-based Princeton and taught mathematics at the Massachusetts institute dedicated to mathematics. Institute of Technology and Harvard University. The monies will create a US$5 million endowed chair, Simons holds a B.S. in mathematics from MIT and a the “Eisenbud Professorship”, named for David Eisenbud, Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of California, director of MSRI, to support distinguished visiting profes- sors at MSRI. The gift comes as Eisenbud nears the end of Berkeley. His scientific research was in the area of geom- his term as MSRI director (from July 1997 to July 2007) and etry and topology. He received the AMS Veblen Prize in as MSRI prepares to celebrate its twenty-fifth anniversary Geometry in 1975 for work that involved a recasting of in the late fall/winter 2007–08.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised August 2014 DAVID EISENBUD VITA Born April 8, 1947
    Revised August 2014 DAVID EISENBUD VITA Born April 8, 1947, New York City US Citizen Married, with two children EDUCATION B. S. University of Chicago 1966 M. S. University of Chicago 1967 Ph. D. University of Chicago 1970 Advisors: Saunders MacLane, J. C. Robson Thesis: Torsion Modules over Dedekind Prime Rings POSITIONS HELD Lecturer, Brandeis University 1970{72 Assistant Professor, Brandeis University 1972{73 Sloan Foundation Fellow 1973{75 Visiting scholar, Harvard University 1973{74 Fellow, I. H. E. S. (Bures-Sur-Yvette) 1974{75 Associate Professor, Brandeis University 1976{80 Visiting Researcher, University of Bonn (SFB 40) 1979{80 Professor, Brandeis University 1980{1998 Research Professor, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, Berkeley 1986{87 Visiting Professor, Harvard University 1987{88 and Fall 1994 Chercheur Associ´e`al'Institut Henri Poincar´e(CNRS), Paris, Spring 1995. Professor, University of California at Berkeley, 1997{ Director, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, 1997{ 2007 Director for Mathematics and the Physical Sciences, Simons Foundation, 2010{2012 HONORS, PRIZES Elected Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2006 Leroy P. Steele Prize for Exposition, American Mathematical Society, 2010 CURRENT RESEARCH INTERESTS Algebraic Geometry Commutative Algebra Computational Methods 1 OTHER LONG-TERM MATHEMATICAL INTERESTS • Noncommutative Rings • Singularity Theory • Knot Theory and Topology 2 Professional Activities American Mathematical Society Council 1978{1982 (as member of the editorial board
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Boocher –
    Department of Mathematics University of San Diego, California Adam Boocher B [email protected] Positions July 2018 - University of San Diego. Present Assistant Professor July 2016 - University of Utah. June 2018 Don Tucker Postdoctoral Research Assistant Professor July 2015 - University of Utah. July 2016 Research Assistant Professor Jan 2014 - University of Edinburgh. July 2015 Postdoctoral Researcher Interests Commutative Algebra, Computational Algebraic Geometry, Combinatorics Education Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley, Fall 2013. Mathematics Advisor: David Eisenbud Thesis: Superflatness B.S. Honors University of Notre Dame, Spring 2008. Mathematics Summa Cum Laude Phi Beta Kappa Awards, Grants, and Fellowships Don H. Tucker Postdoctoral Fellowship (2016) Professor of the Year Award (U. of Utah Greek Fraternity and Sorority Councils 2016) NSF Conference Grant for Macaulay2 Meeting in Salt Lake City (PI) (2015) Distinguished Graduate Student Instructor Award (2012) NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (2008) Barry M. Goldwater Scholarship (2006) G.E. Prize for Honors Mathematics Majors (2008) Kolettis Award in Mathematics (2008) Poster Prize at Joint Math Meetings (2008) Robert Balles Mathematics Prize (2007) Aumann Prize in Mathematics (2005) Publications [12]. Lower Bounds for Betti Numbers of Monomial Ideals. Journal of Algebra (2018) 508, 445-460. (with J. Seiner) [11]. Koszul Algebras Defined by Three Relations. Springer INdAM Volume in honor of Winfried Bruns (2017). (with H. Hassanzadeh and S. Iyengar) [10]. On the Growth of Deviations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), no. 12 (with A. D’Alì, E. Grifo, J. Montaño, A. Sammartano) [9]. Edge Ideals and DG Algebra Resolutions. Le Matematiche. 70 (2015), no. 1, 215-238 (with A. D’Alì, E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semigroup of Betti Diagrams
    THE SEMIGROUP OF BETTI DIAGRAMS DANIEL ERMAN Abstract. The recent proof of the Boij-S¨oderberg conjectures reveals new structure about Betti diagrams of modules, giving a complete description of the cone of Betti diagrams. We begin to expand on this new structure by investigating the semigroup of Betti diagrams. We prove that this semigroup is finitely gener- ated, and we answer several other fundamental questions about this semigroup. 1. Introduction Recent work of a number of authors ([BS06], [EFW], [ES], [BS08]) completely characterizes the structure of Betti diagrams of graded mod- ules, but only if we allow one to take arbitrary rational multiples of the diagrams. This Boij-S¨oderberg theory shows that the rational cone of Betti diagrams is a simplicial fan whose rays and facet equations have a remarkably simple description.1 In this note, we consider the integral structure of Betti diagrams from the perspective of Boij-S¨oderberg theory, and we begin to survey this new landscape. In particular, we replace the cone by the semi- group of Betti diagrams (see Definition 1.1 below) and answer several fundamental questions about the structure of this semigroup. We first use the results of Boij-S¨oderberg theory to draw conclusions about the semigroup of Betti diagrams. This comparison leads to The- orem 1.3, that the semigroup of Betti diagrams is finitely generated. arXiv:0806.4401v2 [math.AC] 29 Dec 2008 We then seek conditions which prevent a diagram from being the Betti diagram of an actual module. Using these conditions, we build families of diagrams which are not the Betti diagram of any module.
    [Show full text]