Progressive Traditions: Cherokee Cultural Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Progressive Traditions: Cherokee Cultural Studies PROGRESSIVE TRADITIONS: CHEROKEE CULTURAL STUDIES A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Joshua Bourne Nelson February 2010 © 2010 Joshua Bourne Nelson PROGRESSIVE TRADITIONS: CHEROKEE CULTURAL STUDIES Joshua Bourne Nelson, Ph. D. Cornell University 2010 My dissertation intervenes in prevalent debates between nationalists and cosmopolitans that have dominated American Indian literary theory and displaced alternative questions about the empowering potential of local identities. Both positions too often categorize American Indian literature with a reductive dichotomy that opposes traditionalism against assimilation, resulting in the seizing of mechanisms that coordinate change and in the unwarranted archival exclusion of many authors—such as those I discuss—who speak to historical problems with present effects. Seeing past this dialectic requires a fresh look at what precisely is gathered under “assimilation” and “traditionalism”—a reassessment I initiate by arguing that Cherokee representations of dynamic, agentive identities proceed from traditional, adaptive strategies for addressing cultural and historical dilemmas. My project is organized into two sections of two chapters, the first of which introduce principled practices from several scholarly perspectives then applied to primary texts in the subsequent chapters. In the first, I examine an array of traditional religious dispositions and the critical theories that have been advanced to interpret and apply them to Cherokee literature. In the second I take up gendered religious innovations in the memoirs of Catharine Brown, a nineteenth-century Christian convert, and in the science fiction of contemporary novelist Sequoyah Guess, both traditionalists who synthesize identities through pragmatic accommodation and find not erasure but support for Cherokee culture through traditional practices like “gaining knowledge.” The third chapter looks at traditional political structures, providing a cultural context for discussion of Elias Boudinot’s and John Ross’s contentious (and again gendered) rhetoric in chapter four. I argue here that failure to understand the tension over Cherokee Removal to Oklahoma in the (de)structure of political centralization, which vacated the discursive spaces that once forged consensus, has led too many critics to authorize nationalist rhetoric uncritically. I emphasize the major themes of worship and dissent herein because they most often suffer misapplications of the assimilated/traditional dichotomy that simultaneously says so much and so little. I hope my work opens American Indian literary criticism to critical theory, opens theory to American Indians, and most importantly, opens the imaginative possibilities of communal identity. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Joshua B. Nelson, a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, is a native Oklahoman, and he and his wife divide their time between Norman and Canoe Mountain, south of Park Hill. He earned his B.A. in psychology from Yale, his M.A. in English from Cornell, and is now Assistant Professor of English and Native American Studies at the University of Oklahoma. iii Dedicated to Tiffany for her love and support, to Mom for her example, to Ronnie for his instruction in the essentials, and to Granddad for his stories. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks especially to the chair of my committee, Laura Donaldson, who pushed, pulled, and prodded me into bringing my project into clear focus. What’s best in my project comes from her guidance. Shirley Samuels offered no end of help and expertise and generously sprung for coffee more than a few times. Her critiques were pointed, demanding, and always spot-on. Angela Gonzales, too, never let up, and her expectations of uncommon rigor remind me constantly of the importance of intellectual responsibility. Her own service and commitment to the American Indian community at Cornell was both a source of strength and a powerful example. Cornell’s administrative teams in the Graduate College, the English department, and the American Indian Program backed me at every turn. Particularly helpful were Dean Terry Plater, Jim Adams, Jane Mt. Pleasant, Kathy Halbig, Michele Manella, Darlene Flint, and Jenka Fyfe. The students in my freshman writing seminars at Cornell helped me perhaps more than they know in getting my ideas into communicable shape. Special thanks are due Alan Velie at the University of Oklahoma for his mentorship and unflagging support. He opened the door for me, and I return to his scholarship for its keen eye, its sympathy, and its realism. People who wonder about the value of non-Indian scholarship must not know him or his work. Robert Warrior and Craig Womack moved me along in both in my thinking and my career, and better examples of engaged scholars I could not hope to find. David Mair, Geary Hobson, Vince Leitch, Kim Roppolo and the rest of the faculty and staff at the University of Oklahoma have been as welcoming and accommodating as anyone could hope for, and I’m grateful for the chance they’ve given me to contribute to the intellectual lives of their communities. I’d also like to thank the good folks at Northeastern State University in Tahlequah for their interest, time, and support: Wyman Kirk and Harry v Oosahwee, instructors in the Cherokee language program, listened to a lot babbling and taught me everything I know about the Cherokee language (and it’s not their fault I don’t know much); Terri Baker at the English department provided me with wonderful opportunities to teach at NSU and equally inspiring conversation; Phyllis Fife of the Center for Tribal Studies extended generous invitations to speak; Delores Sumner, librarian at Special Collections, pointed me toward incredible sources and shared wonderful stories; my students at NSU helped me see much that never even occurred to me; Ed Jumper also put up with a lot of yammering and translated Boudinot’s “Poor Sarah” in its entirety—in his spare time—just because I expressed some interest in it and asked him to take a look; and the administration at NSU also offered me opportunities greater than I have merited. My friends at Cornell are a good bunch. Scott, Pepe, and Cole Perez, and Whitney and Mike Mauer opened their homes several times. Alyce Spotted Bear’s kind heart knows no equal. Alyssa Mt. Pleasant and Alice Te Punga Somerville swiftly and generously welcomed me as a newcomer. John and Robin Parks were uncommonly generous in opening their home. Thanks also to Seth, Ken, Will, and Keith, the other Ken, and the good people at First Indian. I owe my greatest debt to my family, near and far, all of whom offered support and encouragement—I could have done nothing without the Paddyakers, the Hardys, the Nelsons, the Tidmores, each and every one. My mother, Jeanie Nelson and step-father Ronnie Roberts have done more for me and meant more to me than I can express. ᎠᎴ ᏩᏙ ᎩᏟ. ᎡᏚᏚ, ᏦᏪᎵᏒᎢ. Above all, thanks to Tiffany for her sacrifice, her support, and her love. To her I owe everything. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Biographical Sketch iii Dedication iv Acknowledgements v Introduction 1 Section One: ᏙᏥᎳᏫᏍᎪᎢ 30 Chapter One Paths of Righteousness 34 Chapter Two “Gaining Knowledge”: Religious Improvisation in Catharine Brown’s Memoir and Sequoyah Guess’s Kholvn 78 Section Two: ᎣᏥᏲᎯᏍᎪᎢ 148 Chapter Three Town and Country: Contexts and Principled Practices of Deliberation 152 Chapter Four “No Weapon to Use but Argument”: The Removal Rhetoric of Elias Boudinot and John Ross 179 Works Cited 223 vii INTRODUCTION Since the 1990’s, debates between nationalists and cosmopolitans have dominated American Indian literary theory, displacing theoretical and political arguments not immediately concerned with either camp’s political programs. Looking to literature for creative articulations of communities’ shapes among Cherokee people, Cherokee critics like Jace Weaver, Daniel Justice, and others have taken Craig Womack’s cue in approaching literature from theoretical perspectives grounded in some aspect of relevant tribal culture.1 Major trends have included emphasis on traditional orature, ties to and relationships with land, embeddedness in tribal history or political problems, and connections with communities of various shapes. On the occasions that literary critics confront the problematic work of Cherokee authors like Catharine Brown, Elias Boudinot, John Oskison, or Will Rogers, they seem compelled to apologize for the writers’ assimilationist appearances, adopting a historical pattern of dismissal that reduces Indian identity to dichotomies wherein Indians are either traditional or assimilated, and the latter is a code for “not really Indian.” Disassembling this too-long enduring, heteronomous dialectic requires an reassessment of what precisely is meant by assimilation and traditionalism. I argue that Cherokee authors employed traditional adaptive strategies to resolve cultural and historical problems. At the edges of the already liminal, smaller groups of Cherokee 1 Jace Weaver, That the People Might Live (New York: Oxford UP, 1996) 1-36; Daniel Justice, “‘Go Away, Water!’ Kinship Criticism and the Decolonization Imperative,” Reasoning Together: The Native Critics Collective, by Janice Acoose, et al., ed. Craig Womack, Daniel Justice, and Christopher Teuton (Norman: U of Oklahoma P, 2008) 147-68; Daniel Justice, Our Fire Survives the Storm: A Cherokee Literary History (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2006) 7-10;
Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina
    The following chapter is from: The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia Charles R. Ewen – Co-Editor Thomas R. Whyte – Co-Editor R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. – Co-Editor North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication Number 30 2011 Available online at: http://www.rla.unc.edu/NCAC/Publications/NCAC30/index.html CHEROKEE ETHNOGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA Christopher B. Rodning Dozens of Cherokee towns dotted the river valleys of the Appalachian Summit province in southwestern North Carolina during the eighteenth century (Figure 16-1; Dickens 1967, 1978, 1979; Perdue 1998; Persico 1979; Shumate et al. 2005; Smith 1979). What developments led to the formation of these Cherokee towns? Of course, native people had been living in the Appalachian Summit for thousands of years, through the Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods (Dickens 1976; Keel 1976; Purrington 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). What are the archaeological correlates of Cherokee culture, when are they visible archaeologically, and what can archaeology contribute to knowledge of the origins and development of Cherokee culture in southwestern North Carolina? Archaeologists, myself included, have often focused on the characteristics of pottery and other artifacts as clues about the development of Cherokee culture, which is a valid approach, but not the only approach (Dickens 1978, 1979, 1986; Hally 1986; Riggs and Rodning 2002; Rodning 2008; Schroedl 1986a; Wilson and Rodning 2002). In this paper (see also Rodning 2009a, 2010a, 2011b), I focus on the development of Cherokee towns and townhouses. Given the significance of towns and town affiliations to Cherokee identity and landscape during the 1700s (Boulware 2011; Chambers 2010; Smith 1979), I suggest that tracing the development of towns and townhouses helps us understand Cherokee ethnogenesis, more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Corridor Area Plan Is the Result of This Targeted Planning Study
    Northern Corridor Area Plan Adopted by the Bradley County Regional Planning Commission Adoption Date: February 11, 2014 This page intentionally left blank. PLAN OVERVIEW 1 Overview ......................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: AREA PROFILE 3 Overview ......................................................................................................... 3 Geographic Profile & Character ............................................................. 3 Infrastructure & Facilities Overview ................................................... 4 Capacity for Growth .................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2: TARGETED PLANNING CHALLENGES 7 Overview ......................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 3: MASTER PLAN 11 Overview ......................................................................................................... 11 Plan Vision ...................................................................................................... 11 Plan Goals........................................................................................................ 12 The Northern Corridor Area Master Plan Maps .............................. 13 Future Land Use Recommendations .................................................... 16 Future Land Use Focus Areas .................................................................. 24 Future Transportation Routes...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Center
    University of North Alabama Women’s Center April 2010 Sexual Assault Awareness Month (excerpted from womenshealth.gov) Sexual assault is defined as any type of sexual activity that you do not agree to. The assault can be verbal, visual, or anything that forces a person to join in unwanted sexual contact or attention. Rape is the most common form of sexual assault and in many situations is committed on a date by a friend or acquaintance. If you or someone you know has been sexually assaulted there are some steps you can take right away after the assault. If you plan to report the assault you should not wash, comb, or clean any part of your body and if possible do not change clothes. You should go to the nearest hospital if possible. If you are afraid of going alone call a friend or family member you trust or you can also call a crisis center or hotline. There are some steps you can take to lower your risk of assault. Some of these steps include: -Be aware of your surroundings. -Walk with confidence, it makes you appear -Be assertive and don't let anyone stronger. violate your space. -Lock doors and windows even if you are -Avoid walking or jogging alone leaving for just for a few minutes. especially at night. If you or someone you know has been assaulted and you want to speak to someone Rape Response offers crisis counseling as well as many other services. To receive counseling you do not have to be a new victim and it can even be an anonymous session over the phone.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brochure
    In Cherokee, history flows through each and every adventure. As you explore, you’ll find that the spot you’re on likely comes with a story, a belief, or a historical event that’s meaningful to the Cherokees. From Judaculla the giant’s stomping grounds to a turn in the Oconaluftee River where Uktena the snake may have lived, history is everywhere. A look back begins in 2000 B.C., when Cherokee’s ancestors were hunters and gatherers, often sharing their beliefs through storytelling, ceremonies, and dance. They would soon develop a sophisticated culture, however. In fact, by the time the Spanish explorer Hernando de Soto first encountered Cherokees in 1540 A.D., they already had an agricultural system and peaceful self-government. De Soto and his explorers came looking for gold, carrying with them diseases that devastated the Cherokee population. By the late eighteenth century, the Cherokees’ land was also under attack, leading to the tragedy known as the “Trail of Tears.” In 1830, US President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act, moving the Cherokees west in exchange for their homeland. The 1,200-mile journey led to more than 4,000 Cherokee deaths. Those who escaped and remained behind are the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians you know today. The modern Cherokee story is one of triumph— a strong people built on a history full of challenge. Today, you can experience that history in a wide variety of adventures. As you explore this brochure, create your own itinerary, and then head to VisitCherokeeNC.com for tickets, times, and ways to join us.
    [Show full text]
  • Dangerously Free: Outlaws and Nation-Making in Literature of the Indian Territory
    DANGEROUSLY FREE: OUTLAWS AND NATION-MAKING IN LITERATURE OF THE INDIAN TERRITORY by Jenna Hunnef A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Jenna Hunnef 2016 Dangerously Free: Outlaws and Nation-Making in Literature of the Indian Territory Jenna Hunnef Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Toronto 2016 Abstract In this dissertation, I examine how literary representations of outlaws and outlawry have contributed to the shaping of national identity in the United States. I analyze a series of texts set in the former Indian Territory (now part of the state of Oklahoma) for traces of what I call “outlaw rhetorics,” that is, the political expression in literature of marginalized realities and competing visions of nationhood. Outlaw rhetorics elicit new ways to think the nation differently—to imagine the nation otherwise; as such, I demonstrate that outlaw narratives are as capable of challenging the nation’s claims to territorial or imaginative title as they are of asserting them. Borrowing from Abenaki scholar Lisa Brooks’s definition of “nation” as “the multifaceted, lived experience of families who gather in particular places,” this dissertation draws an analogous relationship between outlaws and domestic spaces wherein they are both considered simultaneously exempt from and constitutive of civic life. In the same way that the outlaw’s alternately celebrated and marginal status endows him or her with the power to support and eschew the stories a nation tells about itself, so the liminality and centrality of domestic life have proven effective as a means of consolidating and dissenting from the status quo of the nation-state.
    [Show full text]
  • Redbird Sixkiller Was Born on July 1, 1807 in Cherokee Nation East, Near Lookout Mountain, Georgia
    Redbird A06 Sixkiller 1868 Washington, DC Redbird Sixkiller was born on July 1, 1807 in Cherokee Nation East, near Lookout Mountain, Georgia. As a youth he attended elementary and secondary school in that area, and later he received a scholarship from the Guess Family, a Quaker family, and attended school in New Ark, Delaware, where he studied law and phi- losophy. About 1836, just prior to the Cherokee Removal, Redbird married Pamelia Whaley. She was also born in the Cherokee Nation East. In 1837 Red- bird and Pamelia were informed that they would be forcibly removed from Georgia and would be relocated to Indian Territory, west of the Missis- sippi River. The Indian Removal has become known as The Trail of Tears. Redbird and Pamelia arrived in the Goingsnake District of Indian Territory in the Spring of 1838. They settled near the present day village of Westville, Oklahoma, where they raised a family of eight, five boys and three girls. In 1861 the Civil War started. One would think that an Indian who had been forcibly evicted from his home in Georgia and moved to Indian Territory would not have warm feelings about the United States. Redbird enlisted in the Union Army, and after training he was commissioned a First Lieutenant in the Union Artillery of the Second Brigade. Redbird’s son Samuel served as an enlisted man in the same unit. Redbird served in the Union Army from July 11,1862 until May 31,1865. He was mustered out at Fort Gibson, Indian Territory. His unit was in the battle of Newtonia, Missouri during Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Notes 4 of 14 Wilma Mankiller Reads to Young Students
    A Valhalla Entertainment and Red-Horse Native Productions documentary for Vision Maker Media with major funding by the Corporation of Public Broadcasting Directed and Produced by Valerie Red-Horse Mohl Executive Produced by Gale Anne Hurd Publicity: Educational Sales/ All Other Territories Valhalla Entertainment Distribution Valhalla Entertainment 3201 Cahuenga Boulevard Good Docs 3201 Cahuenga Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90068 Los Angeles, CA 90068 Sarah Feinbloom Lyndsey Miller [email protected] Julie Thomson [email protected] [email protected] (323) 850-3034 Home Sales (323) 850-3030 Vision Maker Media 1800 N 33rd St Red-Horse Native Productions Lincoln, NE 68503 Valerie Red-Horse Mohl Shirley Sneve [email protected] [email protected] (402) 472-3522 Not yet Rated, 74 min, Color © 2017 Red Horse Native Productions/Valhalla Entertainment About the Filmmakers Gale Anne Hurd Valerie Red-Horse Mohl MANKILLER Executive Producer MANKILLER Director/Producer Hurd’s career as a Producer was launched when A filmmaker of Cherokee ancestry, Red-Horse she produced and co-wrote THE TERMINATOR. Mohl’s body of work spans over three decades On location in San Francisco, the Mankiller Documentary crew interviews Roxanne Dunbar Ortiz. Pictured from left to right: Ms. Dunbar Ortiz, Hurd’s additional feature credits include the of film and television content creation and Valerie Red-Horse Mohl (Director/Producer), Tarin Anderson (Director of Photography), Robert Swanson (B-Camera Operator). Photo by Curt Mohl. Academy Award winning films
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Decolonization of the North Carolina American History I Curriculum from the Indigenous Perspective
    THE EFFECT OF DECOLONIZATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA AMERICAN HISTORY I CURRICULUM FROM THE INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVE A Dissertation by HEATH RYAN ROBERTSON Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies At Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May 2021 Educational Leadership Doctoral Program Reich College of Education THE EFFECT OF DECOLONIZATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA AMERICAN HISTORY I CURRICULUM FROM THE INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVE A Dissertation by HEATH RYAN ROBERTSON May 2021 APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ Barbara B. Howard, Ed.D. Chairperson, Dissertation Committee _________________________________________ William M. Gummerson, Ph.D. Member, Dissertation Committee _________________________________________ Kimberly W. Money, Ed.D. Member, Dissertation Committee _________________________________________ Freeman Owle, M.Ed. Member, Dissertation Committee _________________________________________ Vachel Miller, Ed.D. Director, Educational Leadership Doctoral Program _________________________________________ Mike J. McKenzie, Ph.D. Dean, Cratis D. Williams School of Graduate Studies Copyright by Heath Ryan Robertson 2021 All Rights Reserved Abstract THE EFFECT OF DECOLONIZATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA AMERICAN HISTORY I CURRICULUM FROM THE INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVE Heath Ryan Robertson A.A., Southwestern Community College B.A., Appalachian State University MSA., Appalachian State University School Leadership Graduate Certificate, Appalachian State University
    [Show full text]
  • Trailword.Pdf
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. _X___ New Submission ____ Amended Submission ======================================================================================================= A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ======================================================================================================= Historic and Historical Archaeological Resources of the Cherokee Trail of Tears ======================================================================================================= B. Associated Historic Contexts ======================================================================================================= (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) See Continuation Sheet ======================================================================================================= C. Form Prepared by =======================================================================================================
    [Show full text]
  • The Consequences of Appalachian Representation in Pop Culture
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--English English 2017 STRANGERS WITH CAMERAS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF APPALACHIAN REPRESENTATION IN POP CULTURE Chelsea L. Brislin University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2017.252 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Brislin, Chelsea L., "STRANGERS WITH CAMERAS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF APPALACHIAN REPRESENTATION IN POP CULTURE" (2017). Theses and Dissertations--English. 59. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/english_etds/59 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the English at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--English by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing Political Games at the Olympics Cherokee Nation Vs
    A PUBLICATION OF THE NEW JERSEY STATE BAR FOUNDATION FALL 2008 • VOL.8, NO. 1 A NEWSLETTER ABOUT LAW AND DIVERSITY Playing Political Games at the Olympics by Cheryl Baisden The spectacle of the 2008 Summer Olympics, the violent Chinese response to recent demonstrations held in Beijing, China, is probably still fresh in in Tibet, a nation the Chinese have occupied since 1951. your mind. Who could forget Michael Phelps winning a record-setting eight gold medals Oppression in Tibet/Genocide in Darfur or the USA final medal count of 110? Essentially, the issue in Tibet is one of sovereignty. While the Olympics are a great demonstration of In other words, who has power over Tibet. The Chinese sportsmanship and camaraderie, bringing together government believes it maintains sovereignty over Tibet. athletes from more than 200 countries, they also provide Tibet maintains that it has always been an independent an international forum for political causes and issues. state. There have been many Tibetan uprisings against With the world watching, the Olympics have always Chinese rule over the past half century, most notably in been an opportunity to give a voice to global injustices. 1959 when Tibet’s spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, was When it comes to basic human rights — forced to flee his home. More >continued on page 2 for example, the right to a nationality, the right to own property and the right to voice an opinion — Americans have it Cherokee Nation vs. Freedmen: made. But although the United Nations Civil Rights or Sovereignty? adopted the Universal Declaration of by Phyllis Raybin Emert Human Rights, spelling out the rights In March 2007, members of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma deserved by all members of the human voted to remove more than 2,800 Freedmen from its tribal rolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Digital Divide in Rural Appalachia: Internet Usage in the Mountains Jacob J
    Informing Science InSITE - “Where Parallels Intersect” June 2003 Bridging the Digital Divide in Rural Appalachia: Internet Usage in the Mountains Jacob J. Podber, Ph.D. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA [email protected] Abstract This project looks at Internet usage within the Melungeon community of Appalachia. Although much has been written on the coal mining communities of Appalachia and on ethnicity within the region, there has been little written on electronic media usage by Appalachian communities, most notably the Melun- geons. The Melungeons are a group who settled in the Appalachian Mountains as early as 1492, of apparent Mediterranean descent. Considered by some to be tri-racial isolates, to a certain extent, Melungeons have been culturally constructed, and largely self-identified. According to the founder of a popular Me- lungeon Web site, the Internet has proven an effective tool in uncovering some of the mysteries and folklore surrounding the Melungeon community. This Web site receives more than 21,000 hits a month from Melungeons or others interested in the group. The Melungeon community, triggered by recent books, films, and video documentaries, has begun to use the Internet to trace their genealogy. Through the use of oral history interviews, this study examines how Melungeons in Appalachia use the Internet to connect to others within their community and to the world at large. Keywords : Internet, media, digital divide, Appalachia, rural, oral history, ethnography, sociology, com- munity Introduction In Rod Carveth and Susan Kretchmer’s paper “The Digital Divide in Western Europe,” (presented at the 2002 International Summer Conference on Communication and Technology) the authors examined how age, income and gender were predictors of the digital divide in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]