DOCSLIB.ORG

Jharkhand Judiciary Mission & Vision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jharkhand Judiciary Mission & Vision Jharkhand Judiciary Mission & Vision Heed the Warnings Lighting the Path Judicial Setup Case Management 20 Old Cases Physical Verification of Entire Records Correction of Judicial Statistics Comprehensive Cause List of Ready Cases Specialized Benches In High Court Communication of Subordinate Courts With High Courts through email Judicial Work Status Report of Stay Matter Cases & Decentralization of cognigence taking Power Statistics Mission Mode Programme Annual Report (April-2011 to March-2012*) March of Law Two wings of Judiciary Judicial Academy State Legal Services Authority 13th Finance Commission and Infrastructure High Court of Jharkhand Doranda, Ranchi-834033 E-Courts Project The Way Forward * With addenda upto 30th April, 2012 COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS Meet together, Speak Together, Let our Mind be one accord Let our Hearts of one accord Let our aims be common and All of us be of one mind, so we may achieve our target well together Rig veda MISSION AND VISION "When an Institution No Longer Matters, we No Longer Matter." Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. H. Kapadia Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India, Chairman, National Judicial Academy India, Bhopal & Patron-in-Chief of National Legal Services Authority, New Delhi. Extract from Law Day speech by His Lordship on 26th November, 2011 at Supreme Court Lawns "Timely delivery of Justice is one of the major components of "Access to Justice" for the marginalized and underprivileged sections of the society." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir Judge, Supreme Court of India & Executive Chairman, National Legal Services Authority, New Delhi. Based on the speech delivered by His Lordship on the occasion of the 10th Meet of NALSA on 3rd & 4th March, 2012 at Patna (Bihar) Former Chief Justice, High Court of Jharkhand elevated as Judge, Supreme Court of India Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Gyan Sudha Misra Judge, Supreme Court of India “ Case Management deals with the active role with the proper utilisation of time in the justice delivery system” Former Judge of High Court of Jharkhand elevated as Judge, Supreme Court of India Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. J. Mukhopadhaya Judge, Supreme Court of India "My personal exprience says, sincere efforts and commitments of High Court of Jharkhand will definetly bring the expected results in reducing the arrears and preventing unnecessary litigation." "Judiciary needs to commit itself 24x7 to achieve quality, timeliness and responsiveness of justice." Justice Prakash Tatia Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court Quoted from the Speech delivered on 18th September, 2011 at Nyaya Sadan, Ranchi, on the occasion of Interaction with the Principal District Judges & Chief Judicial Magistrates of Jharkhand Subordinate Judiciary. FORMER JUDGE OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ELEVATED FROM HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.K.Balasubramanyan* "Discipline at the workplace in an organisation is the sine qua non for the efficient working of an organisation ." *elevated as Judge of Supreme Court of India on 27.8.2004 and retired on 28.8.2007 FORMER CHIEF JUSTICES OF HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Gupta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nelavoy Dhinakar th th (15 November, 2000 to 4 March, 2003) (4th December, 2005 to 9th June, 2006) Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. Karpaga Vinayagam Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhagwati Prasad (17th September, 2006 to 15th May, 2008) (22nd August, 2010 to 12th May, 2011) JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND ELEVATED AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF OTHER HIGH COURT Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.Y. Eqbal Chief Justice, Madras High Court “Every institution should strive hard to improve its quality of work and try to redress the grievances of the needy people, as enshrined in our Constitution” JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND TRANSFERRED TO OTHER HIGH COURT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tapen Sen Judge, Calcutta High Court TABLE OF CONTENTS Heed the Warnings....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Lighting the Path ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial Setup .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 v High Court................................................................................................................................................................. 9 v Members of Registry.......................................................................................................................................... 10 v Subordinate Courts ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Case Management of High Court ......................................................................................................... 11 v Task of Physical Verification of entire pending records of the cases: ....................................................................................................................... 13 v Communication of High Court with Subordinate Judiciary...............................................................19 v Comprehensive Cause List of Ready Cases Prepared.......................................................................... 27 v New Case Management software ................................................................................................................ 28 v Special benches constituted under N.I. Act and for other such urgent matters.. ............................................................................................................ 30 v Transfer of still pending First Appeals whose jurisdiction was vested in District Judge of Suit Value less than Rs. 2,50,000/-. ........................................................................................................31 v Institution and Disposal of Cases during last Financial Year (2011-12)................................................................................................................................. 32 Case Management of Subordinate Judiciary ................................................................................... 33 v Disposal of '20 old cases' ................................................................................................................................ 35 v Stay Matter Cases and Accessibility of each court with High Court ..............................................45 v Task of Physical Verification of entire pending cases in each Court of Subordinate Judiciary...................................................................................................... 52 v Correction of Judicial Statistics in Pending Cases................................................................................. 58 v Decentralisation of cognizance taking power of Chief Judicial Magistrate amongst all the Judicial Magistrates of the Judgeship in equitable manner ............................. 64 v Disposal of chronic arrears of Acceptance of Final Form & Protest Petition............................ 65 v Rejuvenating Criminal Justice System ...................................................................................................... 68 Mission Mode Programme .................................................................................................................... 81 v Institution and Disposal of cases of Subordinate Courts from April 2011 to April 2012....................................................................................................................... 86 Human Resource Management............................................................................................................ 89 Promoting the ADR Mechanism .......................................................................................................... 95 Two wings of Jharkhand High Court.................................................................................................. 99 v Judicial Academy .............................................................................................................................................. 101 v Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority ............................................................................................. 110 Mediation Centres & Activities ......................................................................................................... 117 March of Law ........................................................................................................................................... 125 13th Finance Commission and Infrastructure............................................................................. 143 e-Courts Project ..................................................................................................................................... 157 The Way Forward................................................................................................................................... 163 *Second Edition of the report after its launch on 21.5.2012. HEED THE WARNINGS Law is a social engineering to help the people. Therefore, we, the Members of Judicial Fraternity owe great responsibility to ensure timely delivery of justice which is of central importance in the development of modern inclusive democracy under the Rule of Law. Governance of Civil Society could be reality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001
    HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RULES, 2001 In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 29 of The Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 (Act XXX of 2000), and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the High Court of Jharkhand hereby makes the following rules, namely : PART I GENERAL CHAPTER I INTERPRETATION, ETC. 1. (1) These rules may be called as High Court of Jharkhand Rules, 2001. (2) These shall come into force on such date**Came into force w.e.f. 6th June, 2001 vide High Court Notification, dated 10.5.2001, as the Chief Justice may, by Notification in the official Gazette, appoint : Provided, however, different dates may be appointed for enforcement of different rules. 2. (1) In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires— (a) ‘advocate’ means a person whose name is entered on the roll of Advocates prepared and maintained by a State Bar Council under the Advocates Act, 1961 (25 of 1961); and includes Senior Advocate and Advocate on record. (b) ‘advocate on record’ means an advocate who is entitled under these rules to act as well as plead for a party in the Court; (c) ‘appointed day’ means the date on which these rules shall come into force; (d) ‘Chief Justice’ means the Chief Justice of HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND and includes a Judge appointed under Article 223 of the Constitution to perform the duties of the Chief Justice; (e) ‘Code’ means the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908); (f) ‘Constitution’ means the Constitution of India; (g) ‘Court’ and ‘this Court’ means the HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND; (h) ‘Court appealed from’ includes
    [Show full text]
  • Module Detail Subject Name Political Science Paper Name Indian Politics
    Module Detail Subject Name Political Science Paper Name Indian Politics: I THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA Module Name/Title Module Id Pre-requisites To understand and evaluate the working of Objectives Indian Judicial System. To explain the evolution and rise of the Supreme Court in India. Role of judicial activism towards public interest litigation and in what way it contributed to shape the nature and contours of judicial activism in India. To explain various problems and challenges faced by the judiciary and reform initiatives to address them. Judiciary, Role and Functioning, the Supreme Court, Keywords Public Interest Litigation, Judicial Overreach, Judicial Activism, Judicial Accountability, Reforms, India. 1 Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof. Ashutosh Kumar Panjab University Chandigarh. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Paper Coordinator Delhi University, Delhi. Dr. Niranjan Sahoo Content Writer/Author (CW) Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Content Reviewer (CR) Delhi University, Delhi. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Language Editor (LE) Delhi University, Delhi. THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA Niranjan Sahoo Introduction From being a reliable guardian and protector of constitution, an able propagator of rights of poor and faceless citizens to an institution of last recourse for millions of citizens to activism on issues that often get little or no attention from the executive, the judiciary in India has come full circle since its inception in 1950. The judiciary which has so far played extremely stellar role in having emerged as institution of last resort as executive and legislative branches have failed to perform their constitutional roles, has in many occasions intruded into the constitutional spaces of other organs.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education
    Eastern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education Newly empanelled legal counsels of Eastern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education, Bhubaneswar High Court of Ranchi S.No. Name of the Advocate Standing Address Mobile No./E-mail Counsel/Legal Counsel 1. Sh. Parthsarathy Anand Legal Counsel C-24, 4th Floor, New Lawyers Chamber, 9709178880/6512413398 Swaroop Pati Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi-834002 [email protected] 2. Sh. Sabya Sachi Legal Counsel Sabyasachi Dandapat Bhawan Bel Began 9835338909 Dandapat Samlong Po+Ps-Namkum Distt. Ranchi 834010 [email protected] (Jharkhand) High Court of Calcutta S.No. Name of the Advocate Standing Address Mobile No./E-mail Counsel/Legal Counsel 1. Sh. Priyabrata Batabyal Legal Counsel 19, Ratan Babu Road, P.O. & P.S. Cossipore, 9831361051 Kolkata West Bengal 700002 [email protected] 2. Sh. Sagarmay Ghosh Legal Counsel Vivekananda Pally (Shibtala) Rabindra Nagar 9433746410 Dum Dum Cantonment, Kolkata 700065 [email protected] High Court of Patna S.No. Name of the Advocate Standing Address Mobile No./E-mail Counsel/Legal Counsel 1. Sh. Sunil Kr. Singh Legal Counsel Chamber No. 102, 3rd Floor, Bar Council 9431647258 Bhawan, High Court, Patna 800001 [email protected] 2. Sh. Mahesh Prasad Legal Counsel Table No. 1, Western Varandah Advocates 9934764863 Association, Patna High Court, Patna-800028 3. Sh. Sarvadeo Singh Legal Counsel 408, Sanyam Pratik Apartment (Near Palm View 0943145234 Hospital), Ambedkar Path, Patna-800014 [email protected] 4. Sh. Anil Kumar Legal Counsel Bhagwat Sadan, Opp. Gulab Complex, Arya 09934824292 Kumar Road, Machhua Toli, Patna-4, Bihar 5. Ms. Sarita Bajaj Legal Counsel 105, Shanti Mohan Kunj, Free Press Lane, 9334265392, 0612-2322461 Rajendra Path, Patna 800001 [email protected] 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos
    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Nos. 6219-6220 OF 2012 Kamlesh Kumar & Ors. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. … Respondents J U D G E M E N T H.L. GOKHALE, J These Special Leave Petitions (Criminal) seek to challenge the judgment and order dated 19.7.2012, whereby a Learned Single Judge of the Jharkhand High Court dismissed the two Writ Petitions bearing Nos. Writ Petition Nos.95 & 112 of 2003 filed by Shri Kamlesh Kumar and three others, all children of one Dr. K.M. Prasad who worked earlier as the Director of Animal Husbandry department in Government of Page 1 2 Bihar. They are being prosecuted under the provisions of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (in short FERA), and those cases have been transferred to the Special Judge hearing the Fodder scam cases. In the above referred Criminal Writ Petitions they had challenged the transfer of those cases to the Special Court by contending that the transfer order was bad on various grounds, the principal amongst them being that the State Government had no jurisdiction to authorise the Special Judge to try these cases under FERA. Those Criminal Writ Petitions have been rejected, and hence these Special Leave Petitions (Criminal) have been filed. Facts leading this Criminal Petition are as follows:- 2. The above referred Dr. K.M. Prasad, father of the petitioners, was working earlier as the Director of Animal Husbandry department, Government of Bihar. He is being prosecuted along with some others by the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) in the Court of Special Judge at Ranchi for conspiracy to defraud the State Government to the extent of Rs.7,09,92,000/- during 1980-90 on the basis of fake Page 2 3 allotment letters purportedly issued by him for the purchase of medicines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Law Reports (Cuttack Series)
    THE INDIAN LAW REPORTS (CUTTACK SERIES) Containing Judgments of the High Court of Orissa and some important decisions of the Supreme Court of India. Mode of Citation 2018 (I) I L R - CUT . JUNE - 2018 Pages : 1010 to 1177 Edited By BIKRAM KISHORE NAYAK, ADVOCATE LAW REPORTER HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. Published by : High Court of Orissa. At/PO-Chandini Chowk, Cuttack-753002 Printed at - Odisha Government Press, Madhupatna, Cuttack-10 Annual Subscription : 300/- All Rights Reserved. Every care has been taken to avoid any mistake or omission. The Publisher, Editor or Printer would not be held liable in any manner to any person by reason of any mistake or omission in this publication ii ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK CHIEF JUSTICE The Hon’ble Shri Justice VINEET SARAN , B.A., LL.B. PUISNE JUDGES The Hon’ble Shri Justice INDRAJIT MAHANTY, LL.M. The Hon’ble Justice KUMARI SANJU PANDA, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.C. PARIJA, LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. MISHRA, M.Com., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice C.R. DASH, LL.M. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. A.K. RATH, LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWAJIT MOHANTY, M.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. B.R. SARANGI, B.Com.(Hons.), LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice DEBABRATA DASH, B.Sc. (Hons.), LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWANATH RATH, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. SAHOO, B.Sc., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Section:X in the Supreme Court of India Civil Original
    SECTION:X IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 BETWEEN: Dr. Akkai Padmashali & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors................................................... Respondents I N D E X Sl No PartiCulars Copies Court Fee 1. List of Dates 1+3 2. Writ Petition with Affidavit 1+3 Rs. 3. Annexure-P-1 to P- 1+3 Rs. 4. Listing Proforma 1+1 5. Vakalatnama with Memo of Appearance. Rs. Rs. Filed By: (O.P. Bhadani) Advocate for the Petitioners Office: O-1/B, LGF (Basement) Jangpura Extension, ND-14 CODE NO. 1934 I.C. No.4812 Mob: 9717268550 New Delhi Filed On: .07.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 IN THE MATTER OF: Dr. Akkai Padmashali & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors.................................................. Respondents P A P E R B O O K [FOR INDEX, PLEASE SEE INSIDE] ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS: O.P. BHADANI SYNOPSIS 1. The Petitioners, who are members of the transgender community, are filing the present Writ Petition seeking a declaration that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is unconstitutional, being violative of their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. 2. The Constitutionality of Section 377 IPC has been upheld by this Hon’ble Court in the judgment reported as Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation, (2014) 1 SCC 1. After dismissal of Review Petitions filed to challenge the said judgment, Curative Petitions were filed, and this Hon’ble Court has been pleased to direct the matters to be heard by a Constitution Bench.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Prakash Tatia 1. Date of Birth: 4Th August, 1951 2. Education
    Justice Prakash Tatia 1. Date of birth: 4th August, 1951 2. Education: B.Sc. (Biology) 1972, LL.B, 1975 3. Enrolled as Advocate: 1975 4. Judge Rajasthan High Court: 11.01.2001 5. Judge Jharkhand High Court: 11.04.2011 6. Act. Chief Justice Jharkhand High Court: 13.05.2011 7. Chief Justice Jharkhand High Court: 11.09.2011 8. Chairperson Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi: 23.08.2013 9. Chairperson, Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission, Jaipur: 11.03.2016 10. Was Member, Advisory Committee, National Court Management Systems (NCMS), constituted by Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Shri S. H. Kapadia First Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice Altamas Kabir, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. Sathasivam, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Second Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. Sathasivam, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice R. M. Lodha, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Third Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice R. M. Lodha, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice H.L. Duttu, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Justice Prakash Tatia, when he was Judge of Raj. High Court, he was appointed as 11. Executive Chairperson, Raj. State Legal Services Authority, 12. Chairperson, Raj. State Judicial Academy, 03.03.2009 – 10.04.2011 13.
    [Show full text]
  • News Letter Vol. I, No. 2, July-September 2012
    Vol. I, No. 2, July-September 2012 INSIDE EDITORIAL When this Newsletter is going to press, the nation mourns the horrific NEW CJI death of a young student, after she was brutally gang-raped and ACTIVITIES AT THE LAW SCHOOL assaulted in a moving bus in south Delhi recently. This tragic and eye- FORTHCOMING EVENTS opening incident calls for reflection – reflection about laws which have FACULTY UPDATES so far failed to check the frequent incidents of sexual assault on women LEGISLATIVE TRENDS not just in the national capital but also in other parts of the country and reflection about INTERNATIONAL LEGAL NEWS AND EVENTS the society in which we live in. An outraged and shocked nation demands stringent RECENT JUDICIAL DECISIONS punishments for rapists including death penalty in rarest of rare cases at least. But MY EXPERIENCE WITH LEGAL administration of capital punishment is not without problems. Delays in sentencing and AID PROGRAMME OF LAW executions, growing number of death row convicts and inconsistencies in the Supreme SCHOOL Court's own jurisprudence on death penalty call for an informed debate over the necessity of retaining death penalty in the statute books. Furthermore, death penalty shifts the focus away from the real issue to the controversies surrounding the penalty itself. Editorial Committee Social outrage leads to reform; and in the wake of Delhi gang-rape case, one can hope Editor in Chief that some far reaching criminal law reforms await us. But not just the criminal law Professor B.C.Nirmal reform-substantive and procedural but also police and judicial reforms are the need of Head and Dean Managing Editor the hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Justice of India
    CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA The Chief Justice of India (CJI) is the head of the judiciary of India and the Supreme Court of India. The CJI also heads their administrative functions. In accordance with Article 145 of the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure of 1966, the Chief Justice allocates all work to the other judges who are bound to refer the matter back to him or her (for re-allocation) in any case where they require it to be looked into by a larger bench of more judges. The present CJI is Justice Dipak Misra and is the 45th CJI since January 1950, the year the Constitution came into effect and the Supreme Court came into being. He succeeded Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar on 28 August 2017 and will remain in office till 2 October 2018, the day he retires on turning 65 years in age. S.No Name Period 1 H. J. Kania 1950-1951 2 M. Patanjali Sastri 1951-1954 3 Mehr Chand Mahajan 1954 4 Bijan Kumar Mukherjea 1954-1956 5 Sudhi Ranjan Das 1956-1959 6 Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sinha 1959-1964 7 P. B. Gajendragadkar 1964-1966 8 Amal Kumar Sarkar 1966 9 Koka Subba Rao 1966-1967 10 Kailas Nath Wanchoo 1967-1968 11 Mohammad Hidayatullah[10] 1968-1970 12 Jayantilal Chhotalal Shah 1970-1971 13 Sarv Mittra Sikri 1971-1973 14 Ajit Nath Ray 1973-1977 15 Mirza Hameedullah Beg 1977-1978 16 Yeshwant Vishnu Chandrachud 1978-1985 17 Prafullachandra Natwarlal Bhagwati 1985-1986 18 Raghunandan Swarup Pathak 1986-1989 19 Engalaguppe Seetharamiah Venkataramiah 1989 20 Sabyasachi Mukharji 1989-1990 21 Ranganath Misra 1990-1991 22 Kamal Narain Singh 1991 23 Madhukar Hiralal Kania 1991-1992 24 Lalit Mohan Sharma 1992-1993 25 Manepalli Narayana Rao Venkatachaliah 1993-1994 26 Aziz Mushabber Ahmadi 1994-1997 27 Jagdish Sharan Verma 1997-1998 Page 1 CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA 28 Madan Mohan Punchhi 1998 29 Adarsh Sein Anand 1998-2001 30 Sam Piroj Bharucha 2001-2002 31 Bhupinder Nath Kirpal 2002 32 Gopal Ballav Pattanaik 2002 33 V.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Jharkhand NEWSLETTER Volume : 2 Issue II*
    High Court of Jharkhand NEWSLETTER Volume : 2 Issue II* Oath Cermony of Hon'ble The Chief Justice, High Court of Jharkhand Judicial News and Events Development of Law E-Court Project Status Progress in modernization and computerzation of Justice DeliverySystem UBUNTU Master Trainer Certification Human Resources in District and Subordinate Judicary Judicial Work and Statistics of High Court and District and Sub-Ordinate Court ofJharhand 20 Old Cases Mission Mode Program Status Report of Stay Matter Cases in the High Court and District & Subordinate Judiciary Also available at www.jharkhandhighcourt.nic.in * This issue comprises two quarters (Jul.-Sep., 2013 & Oct.-Dec., 2013) " The Law...is perfection of reason." SIR EDWARD COKE, Institutes: Commentary upon Littleton AFFIRMATION The precepts of the law are these : to live honestly, to injure no one, and to give everyone else his due. Cicero Members of Judicial Fraternity Hon’ble tHE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HON’BLE JUDGES OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.M. Lodha Chief Justice of India Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.L. Dattu Justice T.S. Thakur Anil R. Dave Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya Judge, Supreme Court of India Judge, Supreme Court of India Judge, Supreme Court of India Judge, Supreme Court of India & Executive Chairman, NALSA & Chairman, SCLSC Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai Jagdish Singh Khehar Dipak Misra Jasti Chelameswar Judge, Supreme Court of India Judge, Supreme Court of India Judge, Supreme Court of India Judge, Supreme Court of India i Hon’ble Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Law Reports
    THE INDIAN LAW REPORTS (CUTTACK SERIES) Containing Judgments of the High Court of Orissa and some important decisions of the Supreme Court of India. Mode of Citation 2018 (I) I L R - CUT . MAY - 2018 Pages : 859 to 1010 Edited By BIKRAM KISHORE NAYAK, ADVOCATE LAW REPORTER HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. Published by : High Court of Orissa. At/PO-Chandini Chowk, Cuttack-753002 Printed at - Odisha Government Press, Madhupatna, Cuttack-10 Annual Subscription : 300/- All Rights Reserved. Every care has been taken to avoid any mistake or omission. The Publisher, Editor or Printer would not be held liable in any manner to any person by reason of any mistake or omission in this publication. ii ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK CHIEF JUSTICE The Hon’ble Shri Justice VINEET SARAN , B.A., LL.B. PUISNE JUDGES The Hon’ble Shri Justice INDRAJIT MAHANTY, LL.M. The Hon’ble Justice KUMARI SANJU PANDA, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.C. PARIJA, LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. MISHRA, M.Com., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice C.R. DASH, LL.M. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. A.K. RATH, LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWAJIT MOHANTY, M.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. B.R. SARANGI, B.Com.(Hons.), LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice DEBABRATA DASH, B.Sc. (Hons.), LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWANATH RATH, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. SAHOO, B.Sc., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Reports [2010] 6 Scr 292 Chairman, All India
    [2010] 6 S.C.R. 291 292 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2010] 6 S.C.R. CHAIRMAN, ALL INDIA RAILWAY RECT. BOARD & ANR. A A Principle of natural justice – Recruitment test – Vigilance v. report revealing irregularities like mass copying, K. SHYAM KUMAR & ORS. impersonation and leakage of question paper – Cancellation (Civil Appeal Nos. 5675-5677 of 2007) of test and direction for re-test – Non-furnishing of vigilance report – Held: Non-supply of the report was not illegal as the MAY 6, 2010 B B question in the instant case was on a larger canvas – No [AFTAB ALAM AND K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ.] action was proposed against individual candidate. Practice and Procedure – Subsequent event – Service Law – Recruitment drive – Malpractice in the Consideration of – Held: Where larger public interest is written examination came to notice after preparation of select involved, subsequent events can be looked into to examine C C list – Vigilance report revealed leakage of question papers, validity of an order. mass copying and impersonation of candidates – Matter also referred to CBI – Authorities directing re-test of candidates In a recruitment drive for filling up Group D posts, who had obtained minimum qualifying marks in the written test appellant selected 2690 candidates. At the time of – Central Administrative Tribunal upheld the order for re-test verification of their original documents, it came to their – In writ petition, High Court applying principle of wednesbury, D D notice that certain malpractices had taken place in the setting aside the order of re-test and directing appointment written examination. Several complaints were also of all the candidates except those against whom there was received in this regard.
    [Show full text]