Numerical Methods Used in Atmospheric Models

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Numerical Methods Used in Atmospheric Models GLOBAL ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH PROGRAMME (GARP) WMO- ICSU Joint Organizing Committee ~.?·· '), .,, : . II • -:- i" ; ; . ~ . -· •.\. NUMERICAL METHODS USED IN ATMOSPHERIC MODELS By F. Mesinger and A. AJakawa VOLUME I GARP PUBLICATIONS SERIES No. 17 August 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD v SUMMARY . VI f. INTRODUCTION ; GENERAL REMARKS ABOUT GRID POINT METHODS. I. Historical introduction . 2. Methods for the numerical solution of the equations of motion . 3. Basic elements of the grid point method 2 4. Finite difference schemes. 3 5. Convergence 5 6. Stability 6 II. TIME DIFFERENC ING SCHEMES .. 9 I. Definitio ns of some schemes . 9 2. Properties of schemes applied to the oscillation equation 11 3. Properties of schemes applied to the friction equation 19 4. A combination of schemes . 21 Ill. THE ADVECTION EQUATION • . • . • . 22 I. Schemes with centered second-order space differencing 22 2. Computational dispersion . 26 3. Schemes with uncentercd space differencing . 30 4. Schemes with centered fourth-order space differencing 33 5. The two-dimensional advection equation. 34 6. Aliasing error and nonlinear instability . 35 7. Suppression and prevention of nonlinear instability . 37 IV . THE GRAVITY AND GRAVITY-INERTIA WAVE EQUATION •.•.• 43 I. One-dimensional gravity waves: centered space differencing 43 2. Two-dimensional gravity waves . 44 3. Gravity-inertia waves and space distribution of variables . 46 4. Time differencing; the leapfrog scheme and the Eliassen grid 50 5. Economical explicit schemes . 53 6. Implicit and semi-implicit schemes 55 7. The splitting or Marchuk method 58 8. Two-grid-interval noise 59 9. Time noise and time filtering 61 10. Dissipation in numerical schemes 62 SUMMARY This publication is discussing methods that are used oscillation (or frequency) equation, and friction equation. for the solution of hydrodynamic governing equations in Discussion of the leapfrog scheme includes a more numerical models of the atmosphere. The number of detailed analysis of the computational mode problem. methods in use in these models is, one might find, sur­ Chapter Ill deals with the numerical solution of those prisingly great; thus, in addition to analysis of problems forms of the advection equation which describe advection involved and techniques used for investigation of proper­ of one dependent variable. Schemes are analysed first ties of various schemes, a discussion is included only of considering the simplest one-dimensional linear advec­ schemes which are more widely used, or which are tion equation, with special emphasis given to the prob­ expected by the authors to become more widely used in lems of phase speed errors and computational dispersion, the near future. and group velocity errors. Then a brief account is The present volume is restricted to grid point finite included of the extension to two space dimensions. difference methods, and, furthermore, to problems and Finally, nonlinear advection equation is considered. methods used for time and horizontal space differencing. Aliasing error and nonlinear instability is discussed, and One remaining topic of the horizontal space differencing, a review is given of methods used to suppress or prevent that of the numerical solution of the advection equation nonlinear instability in atmospheric numerical models, with two dependent variables (advection terms of the including a detailed exposition of the principle of the two-dimensional primitive equations) will be included in Arakawa method. the Volume II of the publication. In Chapter IV schemes and problems related to the numerical solution of the gravity and gravity-inertia wave In Chapter I of this volume, following a short histori­ equations are considered. First, a discussion is given of cal introduction on the development and use of numerical the effects of space differencing on the numerical solution methods in atmospheric models, avilable methods for numerical solution of the differential equations governing of the gravity wave equations. Having now two or the atmosphere are briefly reviewed. Then, basic ele­ three dependent variables, the problem of the space ments of the finite difference method for solving these distribution of variables becomes of interest. Con­ sidering gravity-inertia wave equations, five different equations are introduced. Finally, the concept of space distributions are analysed with respect to their stability of finite difference equations, and methods for effect on the geostrophic adjustment process. Then, a testing the stability of these equations, are considered at some length. review is given of schemes and methods used to ac­ complish an economical use of computer time and/or Chapter II presents a discussion of time differencing elimination of computational modes in handling the schemes which are elementary enough so that they can gravity wave terms - the Eliassen grid, economical be defined using a simple ordinary differential equation, explicit schemes, the semi-implicit scheme, and the with one dependent variable. After defining a number splitting method. Finally, as the gravity waves can of such schemes. behaviour of numerical solutions is generate a false space and/or time noise in the calcula­ investigated which are obtained when these schemes are tions, some techniques available for prevention or sup· used for two specific ordinary differential equations: pression of such space (two-grid-interval) and time noise. T hi~ volume is haset.l <>n a rcvi~et.l tran~lation of a part of the by A . Arakawa for his course 212A, Numerical Methods in Dynamic text hook "" <.Jynamk meteo rology, written by the fi rst of the present Meteorology, that he has been teaching at the Department of author~. for senior year stut.lents o r the D.:partment of Meteorology, Meteorology, University of California at Los Angeles. The revised University of Bclgrat.le . In writing the translatet.l part of that translation was read and further revised by A. Arakawa and, textbook, however, extensive use was made of lecture notes written finally, edited by M. J . P. Cullen of the Meteorological Office. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD v SUMMARY • VI I. I NTRODUCTION; GENERAL REMARKS ABOUT GRID POINT METHODS . I. Historical introduction . 2. Methods for the numerical solution of the equations of motion . 3. Basic elements of the grid point method 2 4. Finite difference schemes. 3 5. Convergence 5 6. Stability . 6 II. TIME DIFFERENCING SCHEMES . 9 I. Definitions of some schemes . 9 2. Properties of schemes applied to the oscillation equation II 3. Properties of schemes applied to the friction equation 19 4. A combination of schemes . 21 Ill. THE ADVECTION EQUATION . • . 22 I. Schemes with centered second-order space differencing 22 2. Computational d ispersion . 26 3. Schemes with uncentered space differencing . 30 4. Schemes with centered fourth-order space differencing 33 5. The two-dimensional advection equation. 34 6. Aliasing error and nonlinear instability . 35 7. Suppression and prevention of nonlinear instability . 37 IV. THE GRAVITY AND GRAVITY-INERTIA WAVE EQUATION ...•. 43 I. One-di mensional gravity waves: centered space djfferencing 43 2. Two-dimensional gravity waves . 44 3. Gravity-inertia waves and space distribution of variables . 46 4. Time differencing; the leapfrog scheme and the Eliassen grid 50 5. Economical explicit schemes . 53 6. Implicit and semi-implicit schemes 55 7. The splitting or Marchuk method 58 8. T wo-grid-interval noise . 59 9. Time noise and time filtering 61 JO . Dissipation in numerical schemes 62 FOREWORD Meteorology was one of the very first fields of physical indicated a need for a means to rapidly assimilate the science that had the opportunity to exploit high speed accumulated experience of meteorology. The first attempt computers for the solution of multi-dimensional time­ was at the hands of two able mathematicians, H. Kreiss depcndent non-linear problems. The authors of this and J. Oliger, who contributed a much needed sense of monograph trace the precedents from Bjerknes to von mathematical unity in their monograph " Methods for Neumann. The numerical techniques first employed were the Approximate Solution of Time-Dependent Problems" based on a small existing body of methodology, much (G.P.S. No. 10, 1973). This present volume, more of which was drawn from engineering practice, such as specifically reflecting experience with atmospheric models, the application of relaxation methods to the solution of has been written by two outstanding workers in the field, Poisson's equation. The working repertoire of numerical Prof. F. Mesinger and Prof. A. Arakawa, with Dr. A. methods rapidly expanded as the physical problems grew Robert as general editor. An additional volume will be in complexity and as practical experience accrued. The published containing chapters on the subjects: spectral growth was almost exclusively the result of the innova­ methods, global mapping problems, and finite element tions of the " using" physical scientists themselves. As a methods. consequence these advances often lacked the rigour and proof that might have been expected from applied mathematicians. The results of this evolution are to be found scattered throughout the meteorological literature of the past 25 years and it became apparent that there was a growing need for a systematic account of the rationale and development of technique. The JOC felt that GARP's needs, as reflected by the rapid influx of new scientists into numerical modelling, would be well served by the availability
Recommended publications
  • Numerical Differentiation and Integration
    Chapter 4 Numerical Di↵erentiation and Integration 4.1 Numerical Di↵erentiation In this section, we introduce how to numerically calculate the derivative of a function. First, the derivative of the function f at x0 is defined as f x0 h f x0 f 1 x0 : lim p ` q´ p q. p q “ h 0 h Ñ This formula gives an obvious way to generate an approximation to f x0 : simply compute 1p q f x0 h f x0 p ` q´ p q h for small values of h. Although this way may be obvious, it is not very successful, due to our old nemesis round-o↵error. But it is certainly a place to start. 2 To approximate f x0 , suppose that x0 a, b ,wheref C a, b , and that x1 x0 h for 1p q Pp q P r s “ ` some h 0 that is sufficiently small to ensure that x1 a, b . We construct the first Lagrange ‰ Pr s polynomial P0,1 x for f determined by x0 and x1, with its error term: p q x x0 x x1 f x P0,1 x p ´ qp ´ qf 2 ⇠ x p q“ p q` 2! p p qq f x0 x x0 h f x0 h x x0 x x0 x x0 h p qp ´ ´ q p ` qp ´ q p ´ qp ´ ´ qf 2 ⇠ x “ h ` h ` 2 p p qq ´ for some ⇠ x between x0 and x1. Di↵erentiating gives p q f x0 h f x0 x x0 x x0 h f 1 x p ` q´ p q Dx p ´ qp ´ ´ qf 2 ⇠ x p q“ h ` 2 p p qq „ ⇢ f x0 h f x0 2 x x0 h p ` q´ p q p ´ q´ f 2 ⇠ x “ h ` 2 p p qq x x0 x x0 h p ´ qp ´ ´ qDx f 2 ⇠ x .
    [Show full text]
  • MPI - Lecture 11
    MPI - Lecture 11 Outline • Smooth optimization – Optimization methods overview – Smooth optimization methods • Numerical differentiation – Introduction and motivation – Newton’s difference quotient Smooth optimization Optimization methods overview Examples of op- timization in IT • Clustering • Classification • Model fitting • Recommender systems • ... Optimization methods Optimization methods can be: 1 2 1. discrete, when the support is made of several disconnected pieces (usu- ally finite); 2. smooth, when the support is connected (we have a derivative). They are further distinguished based on how the method calculates a so- lution: 1. direct, a finite numeber of steps; 2. iterative, the solution is the limit of some approximate results; 3. heuristic, methods quickly producing a solution that may not be opti- mal. Methods are also classified based on randomness: 1. deterministic; 2. stochastic, e.g., evolution, genetic algorithms, . 3 Smooth optimization methods Gradient de- scent methods n Goal: find local minima of f : Df → R, with Df ⊂ R . We assume that f, its first and second derivatives exist and are continuous on Df . We shall describe an iterative deterministic method from the family of descent methods. Descent method - general idea (1) Let x ∈ Df . We shall construct a sequence x(k), with k = 1, 2,..., such that x(k+1) = x(k) + t(k)∆x(k), where ∆x(k) is a suitable vector (in the direction of the descent) and t(k) is the length of the so-called step. Our goal is to have fx(k+1) < fx(k), except when x(k) is already a point of local minimum. Descent method - algorithm overview Let x ∈ Df .
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Lab 4—Difference Quotients and Derivatives (Edited from U. Of
    Calculus Lab 4—Difference Quotients and Derivatives (edited from U. of Alberta) Objective: To compute difference quotients and derivatives of expressions and functions. Recall Plotting Commands: plot({expr1,expr2},x=a..b); Plots two Maple expressions on one set of axes. plot({f,g},a..b); Plots two Maple functions on one set of axes. plot({f(x),g(x)},x=a..b); This allows us to plot the Maple functions f and g using the form of plot() command appropriate to Maple expressions. If f and g are Maple functions, then f(x) and g(x) are the corresponding Maple expressions. The output of this plot() command is precisely the same as that of the preceding (function version) plot() command. 1. We begin by using Maple to compute difference quotients and, from them, derivatives. Try the following sequence of commands: 1 f:=x->1/(x^2-2*x+2); This defines the function f (x) = . x 2 − 2x + 2 (f(2+h)-f(2))/h; This is the difference quotient of f at the point x = 2. simplify(%); Simplifies the last expression. limit(%,h=0); This gives the derivative of f at the point where x = 2. Exercise 1: Find the difference quotient and derivative of this function at a general point x (hint: make a simple modification of the above steps). This f (x + h) − f (x) means find and f’(x). Record your answers below. h Use this to evaluate the derivative at the points x = -1 and x = 4. (It may help to remember the subs() command here; for example, subs(x=1,e1); means substitute x = 1 into the expression e1).
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2 the Derivative As a Function 201
    SECT ION 3.2 The Derivative as a Function 201 SOLUTION Figure (A) satisfies the inequality f .a h/ f .a h/ f .a h/ f .a/ C C 2h h since in this graph the symmetric difference quotient has a larger negative slope than the ordinary right difference quotient. [In figure (B), the symmetric difference quotient has a larger positive slope than the ordinary right difference quotient and therefore does not satisfy the stated inequality.] 75. Show that if f .x/ is a quadratic polynomial, then the SDQ at x a (for any h 0) is equal to f 0.a/ . Explain the graphical meaning of this result. D ¤ SOLUTION Let f .x/ px 2 qx r be a quadratic polynomial. We compute the SDQ at x a. D C C D f .a h/ f .a h/ p.a h/ 2 q.a h/ r .p.a h/ 2 q.a h/ r/ C C C C C C C 2h D 2h pa2 2pah ph 2 qa qh r pa 2 2pah ph 2 qa qh r C C C C C C C D 2h 4pah 2qh 2h.2pa q/ C C 2pa q D 2h D 2h D C Since this doesn’t depend on h, the limit, which is equal to f 0.a/ , is also 2pa q. Graphically, this result tells us that the secant line to a parabola passing through points chosen symmetrically about x a is alwaysC parallel to the tangent line at x a. D D 76. Let f .x/ x 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3: Derivatives
    CHAPTER 3: Derivatives 3.1: Derivatives, Tangent Lines, and Rates of Change 3.2: Derivative Functions and Differentiability 3.3: Techniques of Differentiation 3.4: Derivatives of Trigonometric Functions 3.5: Differentials and Linearization of Functions 3.6: Chain Rule 3.7: Implicit Differentiation 3.8: Related Rates • Derivatives represent slopes of tangent lines and rates of change (such as velocity). • In this chapter, we will define derivatives and derivative functions using limits. • We will develop short cut techniques for finding derivatives. • Tangent lines correspond to local linear approximations of functions. • Implicit differentiation is a technique used in applied related rates problems. (Section 3.1: Derivatives, Tangent Lines, and Rates of Change) 3.1.1 SECTION 3.1: DERIVATIVES, TANGENT LINES, AND RATES OF CHANGE LEARNING OBJECTIVES • Relate difference quotients to slopes of secant lines and average rates of change. • Know, understand, and apply the Limit Definition of the Derivative at a Point. • Relate derivatives to slopes of tangent lines and instantaneous rates of change. • Relate opposite reciprocals of derivatives to slopes of normal lines. PART A: SECANT LINES • For now, assume that f is a polynomial function of x. (We will relax this assumption in Part B.) Assume that a is a constant. • Temporarily fix an arbitrary real value of x. (By “arbitrary,” we mean that any real value will do). Later, instead of thinking of x as a fixed (or single) value, we will think of it as a “moving” or “varying” variable that can take on different values. The secant line to the graph of f on the interval []a, x , where a < x , is the line that passes through the points a, fa and x, fx.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiation
    CHAPTER 3 Differentiation 3.1 Definition of the Derivative Preliminary Questions 1. What are the two ways of writing the difference quotient? 2. Explain in words what the difference quotient represents. In Questions 3–5, f (x) is an arbitrary function. 3. What does the following quantity represent in terms of the graph of f (x)? f (8) − f (3) 8 − 3 4. For which value of x is f (x) − f (3) f (7) − f (3) = ? x − 3 4 5. For which value of h is f (2 + h) − f (2) f (4) − f (2) = ? h 4 − 2 6. To which derivative is the quantity ( π + . ) − tan 4 00001 1 .00001 a good approximation? 7. What is the equation of the tangent line to the graph at x = 3 of a function f (x) such that f (3) = 5and f (3) = 2? In Questions 8–10, let f (x) = x 2. 1 2 Chapter 3 Differentiation 8. The expression f (7) − f (5) 7 − 5 is the slope of the secant line through two points P and Q on the graph of f (x).Whatare the coordinates of P and Q? 9. For which value of h is the expression f (5 + h) − f (5) h equal to the slope of the secant line between the points P and Q in Question 8? 10. For which value of h is the expression f (3 + h) − f (3) h equal to the slope of the secant line between the points (3, 9) and (5, 25) on the graph of f (x)? Exercises 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Math Flow Chart
    Updated November 12, 2014 MATH FLOW CHART Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Calculus Advanced Advanced Advanced Math AB or BC Algebra II Algebra I Geometry Analysis MAP GLA-Grade 8 MAP EOC-Algebra I MAP - ACT AP Statistics College Calculus Algebra/ Algebra I Geometry Algebra II AP Statistics MAP GLA-Grade 8 MAP EOC-Algebra I Trigonometry MAP - ACT Math 6 Pre-Algebra Statistics Extension Extension MAP GLA-Grade 6 MAP GLA-Grade 7 or or Algebra II Math 6 Pre-Algebra Geometry MAP EOC-Algebra I College Algebra/ MAP GLA-Grade 6 MAP GLA-Grade 7 MAP - ACT Foundations Trigonometry of Algebra Algebra I Algebra II Geometry MAP GLA-Grade 8 Concepts Statistics Concepts MAP EOC-Algebra I MAP - ACT Geometry Algebra II MAP EOC-Algebra I MAP - ACT Discovery Geometry Algebra Algebra I Algebra II Concepts Concepts MAP - ACT MAP EOC-Algebra I Additional Full Year Courses: General Math, Applied Technical Mathematics, and AP Computer Science. Calculus III is available for students who complete Calculus BC before grade 12. MAP GLA – Missouri Assessment Program Grade Level Assessment; MAP EOC – Missouri Assessment Program End-of-Course Exam Mathematics Objectives Calculus Mathematical Practices 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Linear and Nonlinear Functions • Write equations of linear and nonlinear functions in various formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Placement Calculus Advanced Placement Physics
    AP Calc/Phys ADVANCED PLACEMENT CALCULUS ADVANCED PLACEMENT PHYSICS DESCRIPTION In this integrated course students will be enrolled in both AP Calculus and AP Physics. Throughout the year, topics will be covered in one subject that will supplement, reinforce, enhance, introduce, build on and extend topics in the other. Some tests will be combined, as will the exams, and some of the classes will be team taught. Calculus instruction is typically demanding and covers the topics included in the nationally approved Advanced Placement curriculum. Topics include the slope of a curve, derivatives of algebraic and transcendental functions, properties of limits, the rate of change of a function, optimization problems, Rolles and Mean Value Theorems, integration, the trapezoidal and Simpson's Rules, parametric equations and the use of scientific calculators. Physics instruction provides a systematic treatment of all of the topics required and recommended in the national AP curriculum as preparation for the AP "C" exam, specifically the mechanics part. The course is calculus based, and emphasizes not only the development of problem solving skills but also critical thinking skills. The course focuses on mechanics (statics, dynamics, momentum energy, etc.); electricity and magnetism; thermodynamics; wave phenomena (primarily electromagnetic waves); geometric optics; and, if time permits, relativity, modern and nuclear physics. I. Functions, Graphs and Limits A. Analysis of graphs. B. Limits of functions, including one-sided limits 1. Calculating limits using algebra. 2. Estimating limits from graphs or tables of data. C. Asymptotic and unbounded behavior. 1. Understanding asymptotes in terms of graphical behavior. 2. Describing asymptotic behavior in terms of limits involving infinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Differentiation
    Chapter 11 Numerical Differentiation Differentiation is a basic mathematical operation with a wide range of applica- tions in many areas of science. It is therefore important to have good meth- ods to compute and manipulate derivatives. You probably learnt the basic rules of differentiation in school — symbolic methods suitable for pencil-and-paper calculations. Such methods are of limited value on computers since the most common programming environments do not have support for symbolic com- putations. Another complication is the fact that in many practical applications a func- tion is only known at a few isolated points. For example, we may measure the position of a car every minute via a GPS (Global Positioning System) unit, and we want to compute its speed. When the position is known at all times (as a mathematical function), we can find the speed by differentiation. But when the position is only known at isolated times, this is not possible. The solution is to use approximate methods of differentiation. In our con- text, these are going to be numerical methods. We are going to present several such methods, but more importantly, we are going to present a general strategy for deriving numerical differentiation methods. In this way you will not only have a number of methods available to you, but you will also be able to develop new methods, tailored to special situations that you may encounter. The basic strategy for deriving numerical differentiation methods is to evalu- ate a function at a few points, find the polynomial that interpolates the function at these points, and use the derivative of this polynomial as an approximation to the derivative of the function.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit #4 - Inverse Trig, Interpreting Derivatives, Newton’S Method
    Unit #4 - Inverse Trig, Interpreting Derivatives, Newton's Method Some problems and solutions selected or adapted from Hughes-Hallett Calculus. Computing Inverse Trig Derivatives 1. Starting with the inverse property that 3. Starting with the inverse property that sin(arcsin(x)) = x, find the derivative of arcsin(x). tan(arctan(x)) = x, find the derivative of arctan(x). You will need to use the trig identity You will need to use the trig identity 2 2 sin2(x) + cos2(x) = 1. sin (x)+cos (x) = 1, or its related form, dividing each term by cos2(x), 2. Starting with the inverse property that tan2(x) + 1 = sec2(x) cos(arccos(x)) = x, find the derivative of arccos(x). You will need to use the trig identity sin2(x) + cos2(x) = 1. Interpreting Derivatives 4. The graph of y = x3 − 9x2 − 16x + 1 has a slope of 5 At what rate was the population changing on January at two points. Find the coordinates of the points. 1st, 2010, in units of people/year? 5. Determine coefficients a and b such that p(x) = x2 + 10. The value of an automobile can be approximated by ax + b satisfies p(1) = 3 and p0(1) = 1. the function V (t) = 25(0:85)t; 6. A ball is thrown up in the air, and its height over time is given by where t is in years from the date of purchase, and V (t) f(t) = −4:9t2 + 25t + 3 is its value, in thousands of dollars. where t is in seconds and f(t) is in meters.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Answers A.69 Chapter 13 Answers 13.1 Vectors in the Plane 31
    Chapter 13 Answers A.69 Chapter 13 Answers 13.1 Vectors in the Plane 31. y 1. (4,9) 3. (-15, 3) 3 5. Y = 1 7. No solution 9. No solution 11. No solution 13. a = 4, b = - I 15. a = 0, b = I 17. (XI, YI) + (0,0) = (XI + 0, YI + 0) = (XI' YI) 3 x 19. [(XI' YI) + (X2, Yz)] + (x3' YJ) = (XI + X2 + X3, YI + Yz + Y3) = (XI' YI) + [(X2, Yz) + (x3, Y3)] 21. a(b(x, Y» = a(bx, by) = (abx, aby) = ab(x, y) 33. y 23. y 2 • • • • •• • • • • •• x x • •• • • • 4 • • • • • • 35. 25. (a) k(l,3) + 1(2,0) = m(1, 2) (b) k + 21 = m and 3k + 0 = 2m x (c) k = 4,1 = 1 and m = 6; i.e. 4S03 + S2 = 6S02 27. (a) d (b) e 29. (a) c + d = (6,2) -6 y 37. (a) 2 .r Q x 3 6 vAw Pl....-).R u 234 x (b) -2e+a=(-1,0) (b) v=(l,2); w=(1, -2); u=(-2,0) (c) 0 y 39. (a) y -2e+a x x (b) (0, I) A.70 Chapter 13 Answers (c) (0,5/2) 9. (d) (0, -2) x 11. w -2 (e) (I, y) (f) v=(O,y) 41. (a) Yes (c) Eliminate rand s. w (b) v = -(s/r)w (d) Solve linear equations. 13. - i + 2j + 3k 15. 7i + 2j + 3k 13.2 Vectors in Space 17. i - k 19. i - j + k 21. i + 4j, B ~ 0.24 radians east of north 1. 23.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 the Derivative and the Tangent Line Problem
    96 Chapter 2 Differentiation 2.1 The Derivative and the Tangent Line Problem Find the slope of the tangent line to a curve at a point. Use the limit definition to find the derivative of a function. Understand the relationship between differentiability and continuity. The Tangent Line Problem Calculus grew out of four major problems that European mathematicians were working on during the seventeenth century. 1. The tangent line problem (Section 1.1 and this section) 2. The velocity and acceleration problem (Sections 2.2 and 2.3) 3. The minimum and maximum problem (Section 3.1) 4. The area problem (Sections 1.1 and 4.2) Each problem involves the notion of a limit, and calculus can be introduced with any of the four problems. A brief introduction to the tangent line problem is given in Section 1.1. Although partial solutions to this problem were given by Pierre de Fermat (1601–1665), René Descartes (1596–1650), Christian Huygens (1629–1695), and Isaac Barrow (1630–1677), credit for the first general solution is usually given to Isaac Newton (1642–1727) and Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716). Newton’s work on this problem ISAAC NEWTON (1642–1727) stemmed from his interest in optics and light refraction. In addition to his work in calculus, What does it mean to say that a line is Newton made revolutionary y contributions to physics, including tangent to a curve at a point? For a circle, the the Law of Universal Gravitation tangent line at a point P is the line that is and his three laws of motion.
    [Show full text]