HIGHLIGHTS of PRESCRIBING INFORMATION These Highlights Do Not Include All the Information Needed to Use MAVYRET Safely and Effec

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HIGHLIGHTS of PRESCRIBING INFORMATION These Highlights Do Not Include All the Information Needed to Use MAVYRET Safely and Effec HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION 1, 2, 4, 5, or PRS3 8 weeks 12 weeks These highlights do not include all the information needed to use 6 MAVYRET safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for 3 PRS3 16 weeks 16 weeks MAVYRET. 1. Treated with prior regimens containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir or MAVYRETTM (glecaprevir and pibrentasvir) tablets, for oral use daclatasvir with (peg) interferon and ribavirin. Initial U.S. Approval: 2017 2. Treated with prior regimens containing simeprevir and sofosbuvir, or simeprevir, boceprevir, or telaprevir with (peg) interferon and ribavirin. WARNING: RISK OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS REACTIVATION 3. PRS=Prior treatment experience with regimens containing (peg) interferon, IN PATIENTS COINFECTED WITH HCV AND HBV ribavirin, and/or sofosbuvir, but no prior treatment experience with an HCV NS3/4A PI or NS5A inhibitor. See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • HCV/HIV-1 co-infection and patients with any degree of renal impairment: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported, in some Follow the dosage recommendations in the tables above. (2.2) cases resulting in fulminant hepatitis, hepatic failure, and death. • Liver or Kidney Transplant Recipients: MAVYRET is recommended for 12 (5.1) weeks in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older or weighing at least 45 kg who are liver or kidney transplant recipients. A 16-week treatment duration is recommended in genotype 1-infected patients who are NS5A RECENT MAJOR CHANGES inhibitor-experienced without prior treatment with an NS3/4A PI or in Indications and Usage (1) 4/2019 genotype 3-infected patients who are PRS treatment-experienced. (2.3) Dosage and Administration, DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS Recommended Dosage in Adult and Pediatric Patients 12 years 9/2019 and older or Weighing at Least 45 kg (2.2) Tablets: 100 mg glecaprevir and 40 mg pibrentasvir. (3) Liver or Kidney Transplant Recipients (2.3) 4/2019 CONTRAINDICATIONS Hepatic Impairment (2.4) 9/2019 • Patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B or C) Contraindications (4) 9/2019 or those with any history of prior hepatic decompensation. (4, 5.2) Warnings and Precautions (5.2) 9/2019 • Coadministration with atazanavir and rifampin. (4) INDICATIONS AND USAGE WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS • MAVYRET is a fixed-dose combination of glecaprevir, a hepatitis C virus • Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation: Test all patients for evidence of (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, and pibrentasvir, an HCV NS5A current or prior HBV infection before initiation of HCV treatment. Monitor inhibitor, and is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients HCV/HBV coinfected patients for HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare 12 years and older or weighing at least 45 kg with chronic HCV genotype during HCV treatment and post-treatment follow-up. Initiate appropriate (GT) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 infection without cirrhosis or with compensated patient management for HBV infection as clinically indicated. (5.1) cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A). • Risk of Hepatic Decompensation/Failure in Patients with Evidence of • MAVYRET is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 Advanced Liver Disease: Hepatic decompensation/failure, including fatal years and older or weighing at least 45 kg with HCV genotype 1 infection, outcomes, have been reported mostly in patients with cirrhosis and baseline who previously have been treated with a regimen containing an HCV NS5A moderate or severe liver impairment (Child-Pugh B or C). Monitor for inhibitor or an NS3/4A protease inhibitor, but not both. (1) clinical and laboratory evidence of hepatic decompensation. Discontinue MAVYRET in patients who develop evidence of hepatic DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION decompensation/failure. (5.2) • Testing Prior to the Initiation of Therapy: Test all patients for HBV infection by measuring HBsAg and anti-HBc. (2.1) ADVERSE REACTIONS • Recommended dosage in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older or In subjects receiving MAVYRET, the most commonly reported adverse weighing at least 45 kg: Three tablets taken at the same time orally once reactions (greater than 10%) are headache and fatigue. (6.1) daily (total daily dose: glecaprevir 300 mg and pibrentasvir 120 mg) with food. (2.2) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact AbbVie Inc. • See recommended treatment duration in tables below. (2.2) at 1-800-633-9110 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. Treatment-Naïve Patients DRUG INTERACTIONS Treatment Duration • Carbamazepine, efavirenz, and St. John’s wort may decrease concentrations HCV Genotype Compensated Cirrhosis of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir. Coadministration of carbamazepine, No Cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) efavirenz containing regimens, and St. John’s wort with MAVYRET is not 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 8 weeks 8 weeks recommended. (5.3) • Clearance of HCV infection with direct-acting antivirals may lead to Treatment-Experienced Patients changes in hepatic function, which may impact safe and effective use of Treatment Duration concomitant medications. Frequent monitoring of relevant laboratory Patients Previously Compensated parameters (INR or blood glucose) and dose adjustments of certain HCV No Treated With a Cirrhosis concomitant medications may be necessary. (7.3) Genotype Cirrhosis Regimen Containing: (Child-Pugh A) • Medication- Assisted Treatment (MAT) for Opioid Use Disorder. (7.4) • Consult the full prescribing information prior to and during treatment for An NS5A inhibitor1 without prior potential drug interactions. (4, 7, 12.3) treatment with an NS3/4A protease 16 weeks 16 weeks inhibitor (PI) 1 See 17 for PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION and FDA- An NS3/4A PI2 without prior 12 weeks 12 weeks approved patient labeling. treatment with an NS5A inhibitor Revised: 9/2019 FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION: CONTENTS* 2.1 Testing Prior to the Initiation of Therapy WARNING: RISK OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS REACTIVATION IN 2.2 Recommended Dosage in Adult and Pediatric Patients 12 Years and PATIENTS COINFECTED WITH HCV AND HBV Older or Weighing at Least 45 kg 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE 2.3 Liver or Kidney Transplant Recipients 2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION 2.4 Hepatic Impairment Reference ID: 4497729 3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS 12.2 Pharmacodynamics 4 CONTRAINDICATIONS 12.3 Pharmacokinetics 5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS 12.4 Microbiology 5.1 Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients Coinfected with HCV 13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY and HBV 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility 5.2 Risk of Hepatic Decompensation/Failure in Patients with Evidence of 14 CLINICAL STUDIES Advanced Liver Disease 14.1 Description of Clinical Trials 5.3 Risk of Reduced Therapeutic Effect Due to Concomitant Use of 14.2 Treatment-Naïve or PRS Treatment-Experienced Adults with HCV MAVYRET with Carbamazepine, Efavirenz Containing Regimens, or Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6 Infection without Cirrhosis St. John’s Wort 14.3 Treatment-Naïve Adults with HCV Genotype 1-6 Infection with 6 ADVERSE REACTIONS Compensated Cirrhosis or PRS Treatment-Experienced Adults with 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience HCV Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6 Infection with Compensated Cirrhosis 6.2 Postmarketing Experience 14.4 Treatment-Naïve or PRS Treatment-Experienced Adults with HCV 7 DRUG INTERACTIONS Genotype 3 Infection without Cirrhosis or with Compensated Cirrhosis 7.1 Mechanisms for the Potential Effect of MAVYRET on Other Drugs 14.5 Treatment-Naïve and PRS Treatment-Experienced Adults with CKD 7.2 Mechanisms for the Potential Effect of Other Drugs on MAVYRET Stage 4 and 5 and Chronic HCV Infection without Cirrhosis or with 7.3 Established and Other Potential Drug Interactions Compensated Cirrhosis 7.4 Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) for Opioid Use Disorder 14.6 Adults Who are NS5A Inhibitor or NS3/4A-Protease Inhibitor (PI)­ 7.5 Drugs with No Observed Clinically Significant Interactions with Experienced, without Cirrhosis or with Compensated Cirrhosis MAVYRET 14.7 Treatment-Naïve or PRS Treatment-Experienced Adults with 8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS HCV/HIV-1 Coinfection without Cirrhosis or with Compensated 8.1 Pregnancy Cirrhosis 8.2 Lactation 14.8 Treatment-Naïve or PRS Treatment-Experienced Adults with Liver or 8.4 Pediatric Use Kidney Transplant without Cirrhosis 8.5 Geriatric Use 14.9 Clinical Trial in Pediatric Subjects (12 years to less than 18 years) 8.6 Renal Impairment 16 HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING 8.7 Hepatic Impairment 17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION 10 OVERDOSAGE 11 DESCRIPTION *Sections or subsections omitted from the full prescribing information are not 12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY listed. 12.1 Mechanism of Action Reference ID: 4497729 FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION WARNING: RISK OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS REACTIVATION IN PATIENTS COINFECTED WITH HCV AND HBV Test all patients for evidence of current or prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection before initiating treatment with MAVYRET. HBV reactivation has been reported in HCV/HBV coinfected patients who were undergoing or had completed treatment with HCV direct-acting antivirals and were not receiving HBV antiviral therapy. Some cases have resulted in fulminant hepatitis, hepatic failure, and death. Monitor HCV/HBV coinfected patients for hepatitis flare or HBV reactivation during HCV treatment and post-treatment follow-up. Initiate appropriate patient management for HBV infection as clinically indicated [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)]. 1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE MAVYRET is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients
Recommended publications
  • Avis De La Commission De La Transparence
    COMMISSION DE LA TRANSPARENCE Avis 6 décembre 2017 Date d’examen par la Commission : 22 novembre 2017 glécaprévir / pibrentasvir MAVIRET 100 mg/40 mg, comprimé pelliculé B/ 84 (CIP 34009 301 087 6 5) Laboratoire ABBVIE Code ATC Code ATC non encore attribué (association d’antiviraux à action directe) Motif de l’examen Inscription Sécurité Sociale (CSS L.162-17) Listes concernées Collectivités (CSP L.5123-2) Indications « Traitement de l’infection chronique par le virus de l’hépatite C (VHC) de concernées génotypes 1 à 6 chez les adultes » HAS - Direction de l'Evaluation Médicale, Economique et de Santé Publique 1/28 Avis 2 SMR Important Compte tenu de : - son efficacité virologique pangénotypique importante (>90%), avec une durée de traitement de 8 à 12 semaines pour la majorité des patients sans cirrhose ou avec cirrhose compensée (Child-Pugh A uniquement), - la démonstration d’une efficacité importante dans des populations particulières telles que les patients insuffisants rénaux ou hémodialysés pour lesquelles les alternatives sont limitées, - son profil de tolérance et de résistance satisfaisant mais avec un ASMR potentiel d’interactions médicamenteuses important, - l’existence d’alternatives qui permettent également un traitement court (8 à 12 semaines) sans adjonction de ribavirine, la Commission considère que la spécialité, apporte, au même titre que les autres combinaisons d’antiviraux d’action directe disponibles (EPCLUSA, HARVONI, VIEKIRAX, EXVIERA, ZEPATIER), une amélioration du service médicale rendue mineure (ASMR IV) dans
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Origins of Viral Capsid Proteins from Cellular Ancestors
    Multiple origins of viral capsid proteins from PNAS PLUS cellular ancestors Mart Krupovica,1 and Eugene V. Kooninb,1 aInstitut Pasteur, Department of Microbiology, Unité Biologie Moléculaire du Gène chez les Extrêmophiles, 75015 Paris, France; and bNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894 Contributed by Eugene V. Koonin, February 3, 2017 (sent for review December 21, 2016; reviewed by C. Martin Lawrence and Kenneth Stedman) Viruses are the most abundant biological entities on earth and show genome replication. Understanding the origin of any virus group is remarkable diversity of genome sequences, replication and expres- possible only if the provenances of both components are elucidated sion strategies, and virion structures. Evolutionary genomics of (11). Given that viral replication proteins often have no closely viruses revealed many unexpected connections but the general related homologs in known cellular organisms (6, 12), it has been scenario(s) for the evolution of the virosphere remains a matter of suggested that many of these proteins evolved in the precellular intense debate among proponents of the cellular regression, escaped world (4, 6) or in primordial, now extinct, cellular lineages (5, 10, genes, and primordial virus world hypotheses. A comprehensive 13). The ability to transfer the genetic information encased within sequence and structure analysis of major virion proteins indicates capsids—the protective proteinaceous shells that comprise the that they evolved on about 20 independent occasions, and in some of cores of virus particles (virions)—is unique to bona fide viruses and these cases likely ancestors are identifiable among the proteins of distinguishes them from other types of selfish genetic elements cellular organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin for the Treatment of HCV Genotype 2 Infection
    Hepatology ORIGINAL ARTICLE Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin Gut: first published as 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311609 on 13 July 2016. Downloaded from for the treatment of HCV genotype 2 infection: results of the real-world, clinical practice HCV-TARGET study Tania M Welzel,1 David R Nelson,2 Giuseppe Morelli,2 Adrian Di Bisceglie,3 Rajender K Reddy,4 Alexander Kuo,5 Joseph K Lim,6 Jama Darling,7 Paul Pockros,8 Joseph S Galati,9 Lynn M Frazier,10 Saleh Alqahtani,11 Mark S Sulkowski,11 Monika Vainorius,7 Lucy Akushevich,7 Michael W Fried,7 Stefan Zeuzem,1 for the HCV-TARGET Study Group ► Additional material is ABSTRACT published online only. To view Objective Due to a high efficacy in clinical trials, Significance of this study please visit the journal online sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 16 weeks (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ gutjnl-2016-311609). is recommended for treatment of patients with HCV genotype (GT) 2 infection. We investigated safety and What is already known on this subject? For numbered affiliations see effectiveness of these regimens for GT2 in HCV-TARGET ▸ fi end of article. Due to a high ef cacy in clinical trials, the participants. all-oral combination of sofosbuvir (SOF) and Correspondence to Design HCV-TARGET, an international, prospective ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks is currently Dr Tania Mara Welzel, JW observational study evaluates clinical practice data on considered standard of care in patients with Goethe University Hospital, novel antiviral therapies at 44 academic and 17 HCV genotype 2 (GT2) infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Amantadine and Memantine
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Communication Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Amantadine and Memantine: Possible Therapeutics for the Treatment of Covid-19? Félix Javier Jiménez-Jiménez 1,* , Hortensia Alonso-Navarro 1 , Elena García-Martín 2 and José A. G. Agúndez 2 1 Section of Neurology, Hospital Universitario del Sureste, Arganda del Rey, E-28500 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 2 University Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, UNEx. ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, E-10071 Cáceres, Spain; [email protected] (E.G.-M.); [email protected] (J.A.G.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-636968395 Received: 2 October 2020; Accepted: 6 November 2020; Published: 9 November 2020 Abstract: We have reviewed current data on the anti-inflammatory effects of amantadine and memantine in clinical and in vivo models of inflammation, and we propose that these effects have potential interest for the treatment of the SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 disease). To that end, we performed a literature search using the PubMed Database from 1966 up to October 31 2020, crossing the terms “amantadine” and “memantine” with “inflammation” and “anti-inflammatory”. Amantadine and/or memantine have shown anti-inflammatory effects in chronic hepatitis C, in neuroinflammation induced by sepsis and by lipopolysaccharides, experimental models of multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and respiratory diseases. Since the inflammatory response is one of the main pathogenetic mechanisms in the progression of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, anti-inflammatory effects of amantadine and memantine could be hypothetically useful in the treatment of this condition. This potential utility deserves further research. Keywords: amantadine; memantine; anti-inflammatory effects; SARS-Cov-2; COVID-19; therapy 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatitis C Agents Therapeutic Class Review
    Hepatitis C Agents Therapeutic Class Review (TCR) November 2, 2018 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage or retrieval system without the express written consent of Magellan Rx Management. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Magellan Rx Management Attention: Legal Department 6950 Columbia Gateway Drive Columbia, Maryland 21046 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended to be educational in nature and is intended to be used for informational purposes only. Send comments and suggestions to [email protected]. Proprietary Information. Restricted Access – Do not disseminate or copy without approval. © 2004–2018 Magellan Rx Management. All Rights Reserved. FDA-APPROVED INDICATIONS Drug Mfr FDA-Approved Indications Interferons peginterferon alfa-2a Genentech Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) 1 (Pegasys®) .
    [Show full text]
  • Antiviral Agents Active Against Influenza a Viruses
    REVIEWS Antiviral agents active against influenza A viruses Erik De Clercq Abstract | The recent outbreaks of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus, its expanding geographic distribution and its ability to transfer to humans and cause severe infection have raised serious concerns about the measures available to control an avian or human pandemic of influenza A. In anticipation of such a pandemic, several preventive and therapeutic strategies have been proposed, including the stockpiling of antiviral drugs, in particular the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir (Tamiflu; Roche) and zanamivir (Relenza; GlaxoSmithKline). This article reviews agents that have been shown to have activity against influenza A viruses and discusses their therapeutic potential, and also describes emerging strategies for targeting these viruses. HXNY In the face of the persistent threat of human influenza A into the interior of the virus particles (virions) within In the naming system for (H3N2, H1N1) and B infections, the outbreaks of avian endosomes, a process that is needed for the uncoating virus strains, H refers to influenza (H5N1) in Southeast Asia, and the potential of to occur. The H+ ions are imported through the M2 haemagglutinin and N a new human or avian influenza A variant to unleash a (matrix 2) channels10; the transmembrane domain of to neuraminidase. pandemic, there is much concern about the shortage in the M2 protein, with the amino-acid residues facing both the number and supply of effective anti-influenza- the ion-conducting pore, is shown in FIG. 3a (REF. 11). virus agents1–4. There are, in principle, two mechanisms Amantadine has been postulated to block the interior by which pandemic influenza could originate: first, by channel within the tetrameric M2 helix bundle12.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting Negative Regulation of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling
    Review Dissecting negative regulation of Toll-like receptor signaling 1,2 1,2 1,2 Takeshi Kondo , Taro Kawai and Shizuo Akira 1 Laboratory of Host Defense, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan 2 Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan Toll-like receptors (TLRs) sense invading microbial pathogens. MyD88 is recruited to all TLRs except for pathogens and play crucial roles in the activation of TLR3 and associates with IL-1R-associated kinases (IRAKs) innate and adaptive immunity. However, excessive and TNFR-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), resulting in activa- TLR activation can disrupt immune homeostasis, and tion of canonical inhibitor of kappa light polypeptide gene may be responsible for the development of autoimmune enhancer in B-cells, kinases (IKKs) (IKKa and IKKb) and and inflammatory diseases. As such, the molecules and nuclear factor (NF)-kBs (Figure 1). In contrast, TRIF is pathways that negatively control TLR signaling have recruited to TLR3 and TLR4, leading to activation of been intensively investigated. Here, we discuss recent NF-kB as well as noncanonical IKKs (TRAF-family- insights into the negative regulation of TLR signaling, member-associated NF-kB activator (TANK) binding kinase with focus on three major mechanisms: (i) dissociation 1 (TBK1) and IKKi) and interferon (IFN) regulatory factor of adaptor complexes; (ii) degradation of signal proteins; (IRF)3 via TRAF proteins (Figure 2). TIRAP functions as a and (iii) transcriptional regulation. We also highlight sorting adapter that recruits MyD88 to TLR2 and TLR4, how pathogens negatively target TLR signaling as a whereas TRAM functions as a bridge adapter between TLR4 strategy to evade the host immune response.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribavirin) Tablets Initial U.S
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ------------------------------ CONTRAINDICATIONS -----------------------------­ These highlights do not include all the information needed to use • Pregnant women and men whose female partners are pregnant (4, 5.1, COPEGUS safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for 8.1) COPEGUS. • Hemoglobinopathies (4) • Coadministration with didanosine (4, 7.1) ® COPEGUS (ribavirin) Tablets Initial U.S. Approval: 2002 COPEGUS in combination with PEGASYS is contraindicated in patients with: WARNING: RISK OF SERIOUS DISORDERS AND RIBAVIRIN­ • Autoimmune hepatitis (4) ASSOCIATED EFFECTS • Hepatic decompensation in cirrhotic patients (4, 5.3) See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • Ribavirin monotherapy, including COPEGUS, is not effective for ----------------------- WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ----------------------­ the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (Boxed • Birth defects and fetal death with ribavirin: Do not use in pregnancy and Warning). for 6 months after treatment. Patients must have a negative pregnancy • The hemolytic anemia associated with ribavirin therapy may result test prior to therapy, use at least 2 forms of contraception and undergo in worsening of cardiac disease and lead to fatal and nonfatal monthly pregnancy tests (4, 5.1, 8.1) myocardial infarctions. Patients with a history of significant or unstable cardiac disease should not be treated with COPEGUS (2.3, PEGASYS/COPEGUS: Patients exhibiting the following conditions should be 5.2, 6.1). closely monitored and may require dose reduction or discontinuation of • Significant teratogenic and embryocidal effects have been therapy: demonstrated in all animal species exposed to ribavirin. Therefore, • Hemolytic anemia may occur with a significant initial drop in COPEGUS is contraindicated in women who are pregnant and in hemoglobin.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatitis C Treatment
    Hepatitis C Treatment The goal of treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is to cure the virus, which can be done with a combination of drugs. The specific meds used and the duration of treatment depend on a number of factors, including HCV genotype (genetic structure of the virus), viral load, past treatment experience, degree of liver damage, ability to tolerate the prescribed treatment, and whether the person is waiting for a liver transplant or is a transplant recipient. In some cases, HCV treatment may be limited by your health insurance plan or drug formulary. Here’s information about each type, or class, of approved HCV treatment along with drugs in the late stages of development: Multi-Class Combination Drugs Brand Name Generic Name Status Pharmaceutical Company Epclusa* sofosbuvir + velpatasvir Approved Gilead Sciences Harvoni* ledipasvir + sofosbuvir Approved Gilead Sciences Mavyret glecaprevir + pibrentasvir Approved AbbVie Vosevi sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/ Approved Gilead Sciences voxilaprevir Zepatier elbasvir + grazoprevir Approved Merck n/a daclatasvir + asunaprevir + Phase III Bristol-Myers Squibb beclabuvir *generic available What are they? Multi-class combination drugs are a combination of drugs formulated into a single pill or package of pills. For instance, the drug Harvoni combines two drugs, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. Ledipasvir is an NS5A inhibitor and is only sold as part of Harvoni; sofosbuvir may be prescribed separately under the brand name of Sovaldi. Pegylated Interferon Alfa Brand Name Generic Name Status Pharmaceutical Company Pegasys peginterferon alfa-2a Approved Genentech What are they? Interferon is a protein made by the immune system, named because it interferes with viral reproduction. In addition, interferon signals the immune system to recognize and respond to microorganisms, including viral and bacterial infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for Korean Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C at a Single Institution
    Gut and Liver https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl19393 pISSN 1976-2283 eISSN 2005-1212 Original Article Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for Korean Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C at a Single Institution Young Joo Park1,2, Hyun Young Woo1,2, Jeong Heo1,2, Sang Gyu Park3, Young Mi Hong1,4, Ki Tae Yoon1,4, Dong Uk Kim1,2, Gwang Ha Kim1,2, Hyung Hoi Kim2,5, Geun Am Song1,2, and Mong Cho1,4 1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, 2Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 3Department of Internal Medicine, Good Samsun Hospital, Busan, 4Liver Center, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, and 5Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea Article Info Background/Aims: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) is a combination of direct-acting antiviral Received November 21, 2019 agents that is an approved treatment for chronic infections by all six hepatitis C virus (HCV) geno- Revised June 3, 2020 types. However, there are limited data on the effect of G/P in Korean patients in actual real-world Accepted June 21, 2020 settings. We evaluated the real-life effectiveness and safety of G/P at a single institution in Korea. Published online August 26, 2020 Methods: This retrospective, observational, cohort study used sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) as the primary effectiveness endpoint. Safety and Corresponding Author tolerability were also determined. Jeong Heo Results: We examined 267 individuals who received G/P for chronic HCV infections. There were ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0961-7851 148 females (55.4%), and the overall median age was 63.0 years (range, 25 to 87 years).
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir ± Ribavirin Vs
    Original research Eur J Hosp Pharm: first published as 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002060 on 7 February 2020. Downloaded from Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin vs glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infected patients Luis Margusino- Framiñán,1,2 Purificación Cid- Silva,1,2 Sandra Rotea- Salvo,1 Álvaro Mena- de- Cea,2,3 Francisco Suárez- López,4 Pilar Vázquez- Rodríguez,2,3 Manuel Delgado- Blanco,2,4 Ana Isabel Sanclaudio- Luhia,5 Isabel Martín- Herranz,1 Ángeles Castro- Iglesias2,3 1Pharmacy Service, Universitary ABSTRact 1.1%, with a total affected population of 5.6 million Hospital of A Coruña, A Objectives Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir±ribavirin (SOF/ people.1 The prevalence of HCV genotypes varies Coruña, Spain 2 among regions, with genotype 3 (G3) being the Division of Clinical Virology, VEL±RBV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) are Biomedical Research Institute the drug combinations of choice for treating individuals second most prevalent in Europe after genotype 1 of A Coruña (INIBIC), with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (G3- HCV) infection. The (G1), accounting for approximately 25% of cases Universitary Hospital of A objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of chronic hepatitis C (CHC).2 Compared with Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, and safety of SOF/VEL±RBV compared with GLE/PIB for G1- HCV, G3- HCV chronic infection has a faster University of A Coruña (UDC), 3–6 A Coruña, Spain treating G3- HCV infection under routine clinical practice progression to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular
    [Show full text]
  • NSP4)-Induced Intrinsic Apoptosis
    viruses Article Viperin, an IFN-Stimulated Protein, Delays Rotavirus Release by Inhibiting Non-Structural Protein 4 (NSP4)-Induced Intrinsic Apoptosis Rakesh Sarkar †, Satabdi Nandi †, Mahadeb Lo, Animesh Gope and Mamta Chawla-Sarkar * Division of Virology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, P-33, C.I.T. Road Scheme-XM, Beliaghata, Kolkata 700010, India; [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (S.N.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (A.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-33-2353-7470; Fax: +91-33-2370-5066 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Viral infections lead to expeditious activation of the host’s innate immune responses, most importantly the interferon (IFN) response, which manifests a network of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) that constrain escalating virus replication by fashioning an ill-disposed environment. Interestingly, most viruses, including rotavirus, have evolved numerous strategies to evade or subvert host immune responses to establish successful infection. Several studies have documented the induction of ISGs during rotavirus infection. In this study, we evaluated the induction and antiviral potential of viperin, an ISG, during rotavirus infection. We observed that rotavirus infection, in a stain independent manner, resulted in progressive upregulation of viperin at increasing time points post-infection. Knockdown of viperin had no significant consequence on the production of total Citation: Sarkar, R.; Nandi, S.; Lo, infectious virus particles. Interestingly, substantial escalation in progeny virus release was observed M.; Gope, A.; Chawla-Sarkar, M. upon viperin knockdown, suggesting the antagonistic role of viperin in rotavirus release. Subsequent Viperin, an IFN-Stimulated Protein, studies unveiled that RV-NSP4 triggered relocalization of viperin from the ER, the normal residence Delays Rotavirus Release by Inhibiting of viperin, to mitochondria during infection.
    [Show full text]