Drosophila Astrocytes Cover Specific Territories of the CNS Neuropil and Are Instructed to Differentiate by Prospero, a Key Effe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In Vivo Imaging of Microglia-Mediated Axonal Pruning and Modulation By
Combined bioRxivsingle preprintmanuscript doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.07.087221 file ; this version posted June 8, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 In vivo imaging of microglia-mediated axonal pruning and modulation 2 by the complement system 3 Tony K.Y. Lim1 and Edward S. Ruthazer1,2,* 4 1. Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill 5 University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4; Canada 6 2. Lead Contact 7 *Correspondence: [email protected] 8 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.07.087221; this version posted June 8, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 9 Summary 10 Partial phagocytosis – called trogocytosis – of axons by microglia has been documented in ex vivo 11 preparations but has yet to be observed in vivo. Fundamental questions regarding the mechanisms that 12 modulate axon trogocytosis as well as its function in neural circuit development remain unanswered. 13 Here we used 2-photon live imaging of the developing Xenopus laevis retinotectal circuit to observe 14 axon trogocytosis by microglia in vivo. Amphibian regulator of complement activation 3 (aRCA3) was 15 identified as a neuronally expressed, synapse-associated complement inhibitory molecule. 16 Overexpression of aRCA3 enhanced axonal arborization and inhibited trogocytosis, while expression of 17 VAMP2-C3, a complement-enhancing fusion protein tethered to the axon surface, reduced axonal 18 arborization. -
Lola Has the Properties of a Master Regulator of Axon-Target Interaction for Snb Motor Axons of Drosophila
Developmental Biology 213, 301–313 (1999) Article ID dbio.1999.9399, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on lola Has the Properties of a Master Regulator of Axon–Target Interaction for SNb Motor Axons of Drosophila Knut Madden, Daniel Crowner, and Edward Giniger1 Division of Basic Sciences, Program in Developmental Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109 The proper pathfinding and target recognition of an axon requires the precisely choreographed expression of a multitude of guidance factors: instructive and permissive, positive and negative, and secreted and membrane bound. We show here that the transcription factor LOLA is required for pathfinding and targeting of the SNb motor nerve in Drosophila. We also show that lola is a dose-dependent regulator of SNb development: by varying the expression of one lola isoform we can progressively titrate the extent of interaction of SNb motor axons with their target muscles, from no interaction at all, through wild-type patterning, to apparent hyperinnervation. The phenotypes we observe from altered expression of LOLA suggest that this protein may help orchestrate the coordinated expression of the genes required for faithful SNb development. © 1999 Academic Press Key Words: axon guidance; synapse specification; alternative splicing; transcription factor; cell adhesion. INTRODUCTION In each embryonic abdominal hemisegment, the motor fascicle of SNb (also known as ISNb) comprises the axons of As an axon projects toward its synaptic targets in vivo, it eight identified motoneurons that project dorsally out of encounters a series of guidance “choice points,” at each of the ventral nerve cord, along a reproducible trajectory, to which the axon can either continue growing, turn onto a yield a precise pattern of innervation of seven bodywall different substratum, or stop and form a synapse. -
Microglia Control Glutamatergic Synapses in the Adult Mouse Hippocampus
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.01.429096; this version posted February 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Microglia control glutamatergic synapses in the adult mouse hippocampus Short title: Microglia and glutamatergic synapses Bernadette Basilico1†*‡, Laura Ferrucci1‡, Patrizia Ratano2‡, Maria T. Golia1, Alfonso Grimaldi3, Maria Rosito3, Valentina Ferretti4, Ingrid Reverte1,5, Maria C. Marrone6, Maria Giubettini3,7, Valeria De Turris3, Debora Salerno3, Stefano Garofalo1, Marie-Kim St-Pierre8, Micael Carrier8, Massimiliano Renzi1, Francesca Pagani3, Marcello Raspa9, Ferdinando Scavizzi9, Cornelius T. Gross10, Silvia Marinelli5, Marie E. Tremblay8,11, Daniele Caprioli1,5, Laura Maggi1, Cristina Limatola1,2, Silvia Di Angelantonio1,3§, Davide Ragozzino1,5*§ 1Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 2IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinese 18, 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. 3Center for Life Nanoscience, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rome, Italy. 4Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 5Santa Lucia Foundation (IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia), Rome, Italy. 6European Brain Research Institute-Rita Levi Montalcini, Rome, Italy. 7CrestOptics S.p.A., Via di Torre Rossa 66, 00165 Rome, Italy. 8Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Axe Neurosciences Québec, QC, Canada; Département de médecine moléculaire, Université Laval Québec, QC, Canada. 9National Research Council, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (CNR- IBBC/EMMA/Infrafrontier/IMPC), International Campus “A. Buzzati-Traverso”, Monterotondo (Rome) Italy. -
Drosophila Mef2 Is Essential for Normal Mushroom Body and Wing Development
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/311845; this version posted April 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Drosophila mef2 is essential for normal mushroom body and wing development Jill R. Crittenden1, Efthimios M. C. Skoulakis2, Elliott. S. Goldstein3, and Ronald L. Davis4 1McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA 2Division of Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming", Vari, 16672, Greece 3 School of Life Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA 4Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute Florida, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA Key words: MEF2, mushroom bodies, brain, muscle, wing, vein, Drosophila 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/311845; this version posted April 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT MEF2 (myocyte enhancer factor 2) transcription factors are found in the brain and muscle of insects and vertebrates and are essential for the differentiation of multiple cell types. We show that in the fruitfly Drosophila, MEF2 is essential for normal development of wing veins, and for mushroom body formation in the brain. In embryos mutant for D-mef2, there was a striking reduction in the number of mushroom body neurons and their axon bundles were not detectable. -
Neuroglial Response to Neuron Injury. a Study Using Intraneural Injection of Ricinus Communis Agglutinin-60
J. Anat. (1989), 164, pp. 201-213 201 With 16 figures Printed in Great Britain Neuroglial response to neuron injury. A study using intraneural injection of ricinus communis agglutinin-60 E. A. LING, C. Y. WEN*, J. Y. SHIEH*, T. Y. YICK AND S. K. LEONG Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 0511 and * Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10018 (Accepted 27 September 1988) INTRODUCTION Several studies have shown that ricinus communis agglutinin (RCA), when injected into a nerve in minute amounts, is retrogradely transported by axons in the nerve, resulting in a selective destruction of the parental cell bodies. Thus, the administration of RCA into the vagus nerve would cause a selective destruction of the efferent neurons in the dorsal motor nucleus (Wiley, Blessing & Reis, 1982; Ling & Leong, 1987, 1988). Such a 'suicide transport' of the toxic lectin is also evident in sensory neurons (Yamamoto, Iwasaki & Konno, 1983, 1984; Johnson, Westrum, Henry & Canfield, 1985; Wiley & Oeltmann, 1986). Recently, the use of RCA has become increasingly important as a research tool for tracing the central projections of primary afferents of peripheral nerves (Yamamoto et al. 1983; Leong & Tan, 1987; Ling & Leong, 1987). While much is known about the consequent death of neurons following RCA application, little is known about the response of the non-neuronal cells either closely associated with, or in the vicinity of, the degenerating neurons. According to Yamamoto et al. (1984), the selective destruction of neurons in the trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia by RCA could possibly stimulate the capsule cells involved in the phagocytosis of the degenerating nerve cells. -
University International
INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necescary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. -
The Functional Organization of Descending Sensory-Motor 2 Pathways in Drosophila 3 4 5 Shigehiro Namiki,1 Michael H
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/231696; this version posted December 11, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 The functional organization of descending sensory-motor 2 pathways in Drosophila 3 4 5 Shigehiro Namiki,1 Michael H. Dickinson,2 Allan M. Wong,1 Wyatt Korff,1 Gwyneth M. 6 Card,1,* 7 8 1Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA 9 2Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10 11 12 This manuscript includes 55 pages of typescript, 15 figures, 0 tables, 24 supplemental figures, and 6 13 supplementary tables. 14 15 KEYWORDS: command neuron; descending neuron; motor control; neuron database; ventral 16 nervous system 17 18 *Correspondence should be addressed to [email protected] (G.M.C) 19 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/231696; this version posted December 11, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 20 SUMMARY 21 22 In most animals, the brain controls the body via a set of descending neurons (DNs) that traverse the neck 23 and terminate in post-cranial regions of the nervous system. This critical neural population is thought to 24 activate, maintain and modulate locomotion and other behaviors. Although individual members of this 25 cell class have been well-studied across species ranging from insects to primates, little is known about the 26 overall connectivity pattern of DNs as a population. -
Structural and Developmental Principles of Neuropil Assembly in C
Article Structural and developmental principles of neuropil assembly in C. elegans https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03169-5 Mark W. Moyle1, Kristopher M. Barnes2, Manik Kuchroo3, Alex Gonopolskiy3, Leighton H. Duncan1, Titas Sengupta1, Lin Shao1, Min Guo4, Anthony Santella2, Received: 21 April 2020 Ryan Christensen4, Abhishek Kumar5, Yicong Wu4, Kevin R. Moon6, Guy Wolf7, Accepted: 12 November 2020 Smita Krishnaswamy3,10, Zhirong Bao2,10, Hari Shroff4,5,10, William A. Mohler8,10 & Daniel A. Colón-Ramos1,5,9,10 ✉ Published online: xx xx xxxx Check for updates Neuropil is a fundamental form of tissue organization within the brain1, in which densely packed neurons synaptically interconnect into precise circuit architecture2,3. However, the structural and developmental principles that govern this nanoscale precision remain largely unknown4,5. Here we use an iterative data coarse-graining algorithm termed ‘difusion condensation’6 to identify nested circuit structures within the Caenorhabditis elegans neuropil, which is known as the nerve ring. We show that the nerve ring neuropil is largely organized into four strata that are composed of related behavioural circuits. The stratifed architecture of the neuropil is a geometrical representation of the functional segregation of sensory information and motor outputs, with specifc sensory organs and muscle quadrants mapping onto particular neuropil strata. We identify groups of neurons with unique morphologies that integrate information across strata and that create neural structures that cage the strata within the nerve ring. We use high resolution light-sheet microscopy7,8 coupled with lineage-tracing and cell-tracking algorithms9,10 to resolve the developmental sequence and reveal principles of cell position, migration and outgrowth that guide stratifed neuropil organization. -
Early Lineage Segregation of the Retinal Basal Glia in the Drosophila Eye Disc Chia‑Kang Tsao1,2, Yu Fen Huang1,2,3 & Y
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Early lineage segregation of the retinal basal glia in the Drosophila eye disc Chia‑Kang Tsao1,2, Yu Fen Huang1,2,3 & Y. Henry Sun1,2* The retinal basal glia (RBG) is a group of glia that migrates from the optic stalk into the third instar larval eye disc while the photoreceptor cells (PR) are diferentiating. The RBGs are grouped into three major classes based on molecular and morphological characteristics: surface glia (SG), wrapping glia (WG) and carpet glia (CG). The SGs migrate and divide. The WGs are postmitotic and wraps PR axons. The CGs have giant nucleus and extensive membrane extension that each covers half of the eye disc. In this study, we used lineage tracing methods to determine the lineage relationships among these glia subtypes and the temporal profle of the lineage decisions for RBG development. We found that the CG lineage segregated from the other RBG very early in the embryonic stage. It has been proposed that the SGs migrate under the CG membrane, which prevented SGs from contacting with the PR axons lying above the CG membrane. Upon passing the front of the CG membrane, which is slightly behind the morphogenetic furrow that marks the front of PR diferentiation, the migrating SG contact the nascent PR axon, which in turn release FGF to induce SGs’ diferentiation into WG. Interestingly, we found that SGs are equally distributed apical and basal to the CG membrane, so that the apical SGs are not prevented from contacting PR axons by CG membrane. Clonal analysis reveals that the apical and basal RBG are derived from distinct lineages determined before they enter the eye disc. -
Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells Sculpt the Visual System by Regulating Axonal Remodeling
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.11.434829; this version posted March 12, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells Sculpt the Visual System by Regulating 2 Axonal Remodeling 3 4 Yan Xiao1, Laura J Hoodless2, Luigi Petrucco3,4, Ruben Portugues2,4,5, Tim Czopka1,2,5 5 1) Institute of Neuronal Cell Biology, Technical University of Munich, Germany 6 2) Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom 7 3) Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Sensorimotor Control Research Group, Martinsried 82152, 8 Germany 9 4) Institute of Neuroscience, Technical University of Munich, Germany 10 5) Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Germany 11 12 13 *Correspondence to 14 15 Dr. Tim Czopka 16 University of Edinburgh 17 Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences 18 Chancellor's Building 19 49 Little France Crescent 20 Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom 21 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.11.434829; this version posted March 12, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 22 Abstract 23 Many oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) do not differentiate to form myelin, suggesting 24 additional roles of this cell population. -
Characterization of Oligodendrocyte Lineage Precursor Cells in the Mouse Cerebral Cortex: a Confocal Microscopy Approach to Demyelinating Diseases
IJAE Vol. 115, n. 1/2: 95-102, 2010 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY Characterization of oligodendrocyte lineage precursor cells in the mouse cerebral cortex: a confocal microscopy approach to demyelinating diseases Francesco Girolamo*, Maurizio Strippoli, Mariella Errede, Vincenzo Benagiano, Luisa Roncali, Glauco Ambrosi, Daniela Virgintino Dipartimento di Anatomia Umana e di Istologia ‘Rodolfo Amprino’, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia – Policlinico – Università di Bari, Italia. *Corresponding author, Email: [email protected] Presented at a meeting in honour of Prof. G. Orlandini, Florence, February 15, 2010 Summary The identifi cation of stem cells resident in the adult central nervous system has redirected the focus of research into demyelinating diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, mainly affecting the brain white matter. This immunocytochemical and morphometrical study was carried out by confocal microscopy in the adult mouse cerebral cortex, with the aim of analysing, in the brain grey matter, the characteristics of the oligodendrocyte lineage cells, whose capability to remyeli nate is still controversial. The observations demonstrated the presence in all the cortex layers of glial restricted progenitors, reactive to A2B5 marker, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, expressing the NG2 proteoglycan, and preoligodendrocytes and premyelinating oligodendrocytes, reac tive to the specifi c marker O4. NG2 expressing cells constitute the major immature population of the cortex, since not only oligodendrocyte precursor cells and preoligodendrocytes but also a part of the glial restrict progenitors express the NG2 proteoglycan. Together with the popula tion of these immature cells, a larger population of mature oligodendrocytes was revealed by the classical oligodendrocyte and myelin markers, 2’,3’cyclic nucleotide 3’phosphodiesterase, myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. -
Mechanosensation and Adaptive Motor Control in Insects
Current Biology Review Mechanosensation and Adaptive Motor Control in Insects John C. Tuthill1 and Rachel I. Wilson2 1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 2Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA Correspondence: [email protected] (J.C.T.), [email protected] (R.I.W.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.070 The ability of animals to flexibly navigate through complex environments depends on the integration of sen- sory information with motor commands. The sensory modality most tightly linked to motor control is mecha- nosensation. Adaptive motor control depends critically on an animal’s ability to respond to mechanical forces generated both within and outside the body. The compact neural circuits of insects provide appealing sys- tems to investigate how mechanical cues guide locomotion in rugged environments. Here, we review our cur- rent understanding of mechanosensation in insects and its role in adaptive motor control. We first examine the detection and encoding of mechanical forces by primary mechanoreceptor neurons. We then discuss how central circuits integrate and transform mechanosensory information to guide locomotion. Because most studies in this field have been performed in locusts, cockroaches, crickets, and stick insects, the exam- ples we cite here are drawn mainly from these ‘big insects’. However, we also pay particular attention to the tiny fruit fly, Drosophila, where new tools are creating new opportunities, particularly for understanding cen- tral circuits. Our aim is to show how studies of big insects have yielded fundamental insights relevant to mechanosensation in all animals, and also to point out how the Drosophila toolkit can contribute to future progress in understanding mechanosensory processing.