DOCSLIB.ORG

DYSLEXIA: Addressing the Educational Implications in Public Schools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DYSLEXIA: Addressing the Educational Implications in Public Schools BUSINESS OF THE ASSOCIATION Proposed Amendments to the Bylaws Delegates to the 2016 convention will be asked to consider the following amendments to the California State PTA bylaws, published in the California State PTA Toolkit, and posted online at capta.org. Unit presidents are asked to assure that delegates arrive at convention informed regarding the views of their membership on these questions. Deletions are identified by a line through the word (unit); additions, insertions or substitutions are identified by underlining (unit). Each proposed revision is followed by the rationale for the change. ARTICLE VIII — Officers ARTICLE XII — Nominations and Elections petition, nominations may be made from the floor providing the nominee has Section 1. The officers of the State PTA shall be a Any person who is qualified to be an elected officer president, a president-elect, nine (9) seven (7) vice may be nominated by one of the following a. given consent; presidents, secretary, treasurer, parliamentarian and procedures: b. filed a written notice with the president of intent director of legislation. Section 2. Nomination by Petition. to be nominated from the floor at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of the state *PROVISO: Change to take effect 07/01/2017. a. Only unsuccessful candidates in the most recent convention, and; nomination by committee process may proceed RATIONALE: The Internal Structures Committee by nomination by petition. c. been an unsuccessful candidate through the most of the California State PTA has been reviewing Board recent nominating committee process. structure and function for the past two terms. The b. An official nominating petition, obtained from committee appointed for this term studied previous the State office, shall be completed and delivered When the opportunity for all nominations has been recommendations and work of the previous terms to the State president or secretary no later than fulfilled following any of the foregoing procedures, Internal Structures Committees. The committee looked forty-eight (48) hours thirty (30) days prior to the the nominations shall be closed. at the current functions, roles and responsibilities of opening of convention. vice presidents (VP) according to the Standing Rules. The current wording allows Staff support for VP and Board of Directors, c. The petitioners shall be delegates to the RATIONALE: individuals to bypass the rigorous application and vetting interviews with current and past VPs were also convention at which the officers are to be elected process. By including a requirement for individuals to reviewed. The committee held webinars to share and shall number not less than two percent (2%) participate in the nomination by committee process, they information and solicit questions. An opportunity was of the delegate body attending the last previous will have demonstrated an initial effort for obtaining a provided at the November 2015 Board of managers convention. board position. A potential hostile environment may arise meeting for all board members to provide written should any candidate nominated by petition or from the feedback, which was then collated and further d. Nominations received by petitions shall be floor and subsequently elected by delegates due to not reviewed by the Internal Structures Committee. presented by the president following the report of participating in the initial vetting process. Based on these reviews, the committee recommends the nominating committee. combining the responsibilities for Membership and Section 3. Nomination at the Meeting. The change in timing for submission of a petition is in Programs and Member Services, and Health and support of convention /conference planning. In past Community Concerns. The resulting vice presidents At the conclusion of the report of the nominating election cycles, there have been individuals declaring an would be 1) leadership, 2) membership & member committee and the report of any nomination by intent to petition or run from the floor, only to drop their services, 3) communications, 4) convention, petition, nominations may be made from the floor intent at the last minute. This has created much 5) community concerns & health, 6) education and providing the nominee has given consent and has unnecessary planning and scheduling challenges, 7) family engagement. The committee agreed these filed a written notice with the president of intent to including; volunteer scheduling, making time in general changes, if approved, should take effect at the be nominated from the floor at least thirty (30) days meetings for speeches, locating voting room, securing beginning of the next term. The committee also prior to the beginning of the state convention. When voting equipment and identifying when and where reviewed the Standing Rules pertaining to the delegates can meet the candidates vying for the same suggested combinations if the bylaws change is the opportunity for all nominations has been office. The current requirement of 48 hours causes a lot approved by the convention delegates. The Standing fulfilled following any of the foregoing procedures, of unnecessary last minute work to undo the plans for a Rules changes would be considered for adoption by the nominations shall be closed. challenged office. The two days before convention is the CAPTA Board of Managers in mid-2016 to take At the conclusion of the report of the nominating already stressful in setting up the convention site. effect 7/1/2017 to be consistent with the Bylaws committee and the report of any nomination by Extending the notification for petitioning will prevent a change. lot of unnecessary work and allow planners to focus on activities that will be realized. RESOLUTION A DYSLEXIA: Addressing the Educational Implications in Public Schools 1 WHEREAS, Dyslexia is a specific Individual Education Program (IEP) 1 RESOLVED, That the California State districts support teacher/staff training learning disability that is documents; and PTA, and its units, councils and necessary to improve the neurobiological in origin and is 4 WHEREAS, Without appropriate districts recognize that dyslexia has understanding of dyslexia and its characterized by difficulties with remediation, most students who significant educational implications warning signs, including training in accurate and/or fluent word struggle to learn to read, continue to that need to be better addressed by appropriate evidence-based Structured recognition and by poor spelling and struggle with reading, with lasting public schools and school districts; Literacy Instruction for students with decoding abilities, which typically consequences including not reaching and be it further dyslexia in accordance with the International Dyslexia Association’s result from a deficit in the college and career readiness, increased 2 RESOLVED, That the California State Knowledge & Practice Standards for phonological component of language risk of not earning a high school PTA, and its units, councils and Teachers of Reading, and to promote that is often unexpected in relation to diploma, not attending or completing districts hereby adopt the following knowledge of appropriate other cognitive abilities and the college, and social/emotional definition of dyslexia (previously accommodations for dyslexic provision of effective classroom problems; and adopted by the Board of Directors of students; and be it further instruction, whose secondary the International Dyslexia Association consequences may include problems 5 WHEREAS, There is compelling scientific evidence that early and the National Institute of Child 4 RESOLVED, That the California State in reading comprehension and reduced Health and Human Development PTA, and its units, councils and reading experience that can impede identification and intervention using an evidence-based multisensory, (NICHD)): districts support early screening for growth of vocabulary and background signs and symptoms of dyslexia in direct, explicit, structured and “Dyslexia is a specific learning knowledge; and kindergarten through the third grade, sequential approach to instructing disability that is neurobiological in with parental notification; the use of 2 WHEREAS, Up to 20% of the general pupils with dyslexia (defined as origin. It is characterized by evidence-based Structured Literacy population, or over 1 million students “Structured Literacy Instruction” difficulties with accurate and/or fluent Instruction as defined by the in California K-12 public schools, by the International Dyslexia word recognition and by poor spelling International Dyslexia Association; display signs or symptoms of Association) improves literacy and decoding abilities. These and the use of appropriate dyslexia; and outcomes for most students with difficulties typically result from a accommodations in order to provide 3 WHEREAS, The term dyslexia is symptoms of dyslexia; and deficit in the phonological component students with dyslexia equitable found in twenty-two states’ laws, of language that is often unexpected in 6 WHEREAS, Most teacher access to the general education including California Education Code, relation to other cognitive abilities and preparation programs provide no curriculum; and be it further and in Federal law under the training regarding dyslexia, the provision of effective classroom Individuals with Disabilities appropriate accommodations or instruction. Secondary consequences 5 RESOLVED, That the California State Education Act (IDEA) within the evidence-based
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dyslexia FACT SHEET
    Dyslexia FACT SHEET Dyslexia affects about 15 to 20 percent of the population, making level overview of dyslexia for Colorado educators and parents, it the most commonly diagnosed learning disability. Although focusing on what dyslexia is, how it impacts our students, dyslexia impacts many of our students, it remains one of the least what to look for and basic instructional implications. understood disabilities. This document provides a high- Dyslexia is Brain-Based Brain imaging studies have shown brain differences between people with and without dyslexia. These differences occur in areas of the brain involved with key reading skills. For individuals with dyslexia, areas of the brain involving reading may not function in the same ways that they do in individuals without dyslexia. Key Features of Dyslexia Individuals with dyslexia often have difficulty with phonological processing, spelling and/or rapid naming. Key Features: • Slow inaccurate or labored oral reading (lack of reading • Difficulty with spelling may be recognized as an inability to fluency) efficiently write the letters comprising words from memory. • Difficulty with phonological processing is the inability to Increased time needed to spell words and spelling errors may effectively decode letters into blended sounds to form words. be apparent. A fundamental phonological processing problem may “block” • Difficulty with rapid naming may be evident when it is access to other more advanced aspects of reading, such as increasingly difficult to quickly retrieve the speech sounds and word identification and comprehension. the correct letter order patterns required to be an efficient reader or speller. FACTS Dyslexia affects the brain areas associated with detection and Dyslexia has a range of severity.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Children with Dyslexia Struggle with Writing and How to Help Them
    LSHSS Tutorial Why Children With Dyslexia Struggle With Writing and How to Help Them Michael Hebert,a Devin M. Kearns,b Joanne Baker Hayes,b Pamela Bazis,a and Samantha Coopera Purpose: Children with dyslexia often have related writing quality (e.g., handwriting and executive function), we examined difficulties. In the simple view of writing model, high-quality recent meta-analyses of writing and supplemented that by writing depends on good transcription skills, working memory, conducting forward searches. and executive function—all of which can be difficult for Results: Through the search, we found evidence of effective children with dyslexia and result in poor spelling and low remedial and compensatory intervention strategies in spelling, overall writing quality. In this article, we describe the transcription, executive function, and working memory. challenges of children with dyslexia in terms of the simple Some strategies included spelling using sound-spellings view of writing and instructional strategies to increase and morphemes and overall quality using text structure, spelling and overall writing quality in children with dyslexia. sentence combining, and self-regulated strategy development. Method: For spelling strategies, we conducted systematic Conclusions: Many students with dyslexia experience writing searches across 2 databases for studies examining the difficulty in multiple areas. However, their writing (and even effectiveness of spelling interventions for students with reading) skills can improve with the instructional strategies dyslexia as well as including studies from 2 meta-analyses. identified in this article. We describe instructional procedures To locate other instructional practices to increase writing and provide links to resources throughout the article. tudents with dyslexia often also have writing diffi- impacts the underlying process for both the reading and culties.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Vs Non-Shallow Orthographies and Learning to Read Workshop 28-29 September 2005
    A Report of the OECD-CERI LEARNING SCIENCES AND BRAIN RESEARCH Shallow vs Non-shallow Orthographies and Learning to Read Workshop 28-29 September 2005 St. John’s College Cambridge University UK Co-hosted by The Centre for Neuroscience in Education Cambridge University Report prepared by Cassandra Davis OECD, Learning Sciences and Brain Research Project 1 Background information The goal of this report of this workshop is to: • Provide an overview of the content of the workshop presentations. • Present a summary of the discussion on cross-language differences in learning to read and the future of brain science research in this arena. N.B. The project on "Learning Sciences and Brain Research" was introduced to the OECD's CERI Governing Board on 23 November 1999, outlining proposed work for the future. The purpose of this novel project was to create collaboration between the learning sciences and brain research on the one hand, and researchers and policy makers on the other hand. The CERI Governing Board recognised this as a risk venture, as most innovative programmes are, but with a high potential pay-off. The CERI Secretariat and Governing Board agreed in particular that the project had excellent potential for better understanding learning processes over the lifecycle, but that ethical questions also existed. Together these potentials and concerns highlighted the need for dialogue between the different stakeholders. The project is now in its second phase (2002- 2005), and has channelled its activities into 3 networks (literacy, numeracy and lifelong learning) using a three dimensional approach: problem-focused; trans-disciplinary; and international.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological and Visual Processing Deficits Can Dissociate In
    Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies Sylviane Valdois, Marie-Line Bosse, Bernard Ans, Serge Carbonnel, Michel Zorman, Danielle David, Jacques Pellat To cite this version: Sylviane Valdois, Marie-Line Bosse, Bernard Ans, Serge Carbonnel, Michel Zorman, et al.. Phonolog- ical and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from twocase studies. Reading and Writing, Springer Verlag, 2003, 16, pp.541-572. hal-00826014 HAL Id: hal-00826014 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00826014 Submitted on 27 May 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies Sylviane Valdois*, Marie-Line Bosse*, B. Ans*, S. Carbonnel*°, Michel Zorman** D. David *** & Jacques Pellat *** * Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale (UMR 5105, CNRS) Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble ** Laboratoire Cogni-sciences et apprentissage, IUFM et Université
    [Show full text]
  • Dyslexia and Mathematics
    Dyslexia and Mathematics No 2.6 in the series of Supporting Dyslexic Pupils in the Secondary Curriculum By Moira Thomson Supporting Dyslexic Pupils in the Secondary Curriculum by Moira Thomson DYSLEXIA AND MATHEMATICS Published in Great Britain by Dyslexia Scotland in 2007 Dyslexia Scotland, Stirling Business Centre Wellgreen, Stirling FK8 2DZ Charity No: SCO00951 © Dyslexia Scotland 2007 ISBN 13 978 1 906401 12 2 Printed and bound in Great Britain by M & A Thomson Litho Ltd, East Kilbride, Scotland Supporting Dyslexic Pupils in the Secondary Curriculum by Moira Thomson Complete set comprises 18 booklets and a CD of downloadable material (see inside back cover for full details of CD contents) Foreword by Dr. Gavin Reid, a senior lecturer in the Department of Educational Studies, Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh. An experienced teacher, educational psychologist, university lecturer, researcher and author, he has made over 600 conference and seminar presentations in more than 35 countries and has authored, co-authored and edited fifteen books for teachers and parents. 1.0 Dyslexia: Secondary Teachers’ Guides 1.1. Identification and Assessment of Dyslexia at Secondary School 1.2. Dyslexia and the Underpinning Skills for the Secondary Curriculum 1.3. Classroom Management of Dyslexia at Secondary School 1.4. Information for the Secondary Support for Learning Team 1.5. Supporting Parents of Secondary School Pupils with Dyslexia 1.6. Using ICT to Support Dyslexic Pupils in the Secondary Curriculum 1.7. Dyslexia and Examinations 2.0 Subject Teachers’ Guides 2.1. Dyslexia and Art, Craft & Design 2.2. Dyslexia and Drama (Performing Arts) 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of High-Quality Evidence Based Phonics Programs
    Dyslexia - SPELD Foundation LITERACY AND CLINICAL SERVICES SERVICES Examples of High Quality, Evidence-Based Phonics Programs and Resources Reading and spelling are reversible processes and need to be explicitly taught together through the use of a structured and systematic phonics program. There are a number of programs available for use by tutors, teachers and parents that cater for the literacy needs of individuals from pre-school through to adulthood. Some examples of structured and systematic evidence-based programs for use by trained teachers, tutors, or parents who have undergone training courses appear below: (DSF provides training in many of these programs) n Sounds-Write – an evidence-based linguistic phonics program utilising a highly successful approach to the teaching of reading, spelling, and writing. It is aimed primarily at children in Pre-primary to Year 3, as a whole- school approach to teaching literacy and as an intervention program for middle to upper primary students and secondary students. It is also an excellent phonics program for adults. n Phonics Books UK (including the Dandelion, Totem, Magic Belt, Alba, Rescue, Talisman and Moon Dog series and Talisman Readers) – decodable readers which follow the Sounds-Write teaching sequence and are accompanied by a range of carefully developed student workbooks. Highly recommended for use with any structured synthetic phonics program or as a stand-alone program (available at both the DSF Library and in the DSF bookstore). n MultiLit Reading Tutor Program, MacqLit, Word Attack Skills Extension Program, MiniLit Early Intervention Program, PreLit Early Literacy Preparation and InitiaLit-Foundation – very structured and explicit remedial programs developed by Macquarie University, which aim to address the needs of children with reading difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyslexia & Dysgraphia
    Dyslexia & Dysgraphia Cena Holifield, Ph.D., CALT, QI The 3-D School, Executive Director William Carey University, Assistant Professor Oral Communication is a Natural Process Reading and Writing are not Natural Processes The lecture today will answer these questions…. • What is Dyslexia? • What is Dysgraphia? • How can these disorders be addressed? Specific Learning Disorders • Dyslexia Dysgraphia Reading Written Expression Specific Learning Disorder • a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, which may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell or to do mathematical calculations. IDEA, 2004 Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurological in origin. Students have difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language. Difficulties are often unexpected in relation to cognitive ability and the provision of traditional classroom instruction. Secondary consequences may include problems in reading comprehension and reduced reading experience that can impede growth of vocabulary and background knowledge. Dysgraphia • Dysgraphia is a specific learning disability that is a neurological condition causing trouble with written expression. Students struggle with holding a pencil, organizing letters on a line, therefore, handwriting tends to be messy. Many struggle with
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Explaining Developmental Dyslexia : Orthographic Processing Difficulties
    1 Explaining developmental dyslexia : Orthographic processing difficulties John Munro1 The present paper reviews an on-going series of studies researching the representation of word knowledge by dyslexic readers. The studies examine the orthographic knowledge that dyslexic readers construct about words and teaching strategies for helping them to improve this knowledge. Fluent readers process text at a number of levels; at the word, the sentence, the conceptual and the topic levels (Munro & Munro, 1991, 1994). The outputs from each process are retained for varying durations in short-term working memory. Depending in part on their purposes for reading at any time, readers perceive the outputs of some levels to be more useful than those at other levels. As they read, they move between the various levels in ways that would be difficult to map in a general sense They may, for example, begin by processing a few words in a text to gain an initial impression of its likely topic, making use of their existing knowledge. They may then return to modify this initial topic level impression after working at the word and sentence levels. Sentence level processing can facilitate word level processing by assisting readers to anticipate words within a sentence, thus contributing to word level processes within the sentence. The representation of the text constructed by the reader at any time is determined in part by the efficiency of the processing at each level. One aspect of this efficiency is the extent to which the processing make demands on attention. The more any one of these processes uses up the limited attentional resources available to the reader, the less attention there is available for processing at the other levels and for building a continually- updated integrated model of the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyslexia and Learning Style
    DYSLEXIA AND LEARNING STYLE A Practitioner’s Handbook Second Edition Tilly Mortimore DYSLEXIA AND LEARNING STYLE DYSLEXIA AND LEARNING STYLE A Practitioner’s Handbook Second Edition Tilly Mortimore Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England Telephone (ϩ44) 1243 779777 First edition published 2003 by Whurr Publishers Email (for orders and customer service enquiries): [email protected] Visit our Home Page on www.wiley.com All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (ϩ44) 1243 770620. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The Publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services.
    [Show full text]
  • Really Great Reading for Students with Dyslexia
    Really Great Reading for Students with Dyslexia Really Great Reading’s Phonics Suite for reading connected text.” The Really Great Reading approach contains critical, evidence-based components contains three research-based programs of dyslexia instruction. Our explicit, systematic, engaging, for teaching foundational reading multisensory, and developmentally appropriate programs skills to emerging and beginning teach students the key skills they need to become efficient and accurate decoders, which ultimately leads readers: Countdown (Kindergarten), to their success not only in Blast Foundations (Grade 1), and HD …instruction for word identification, but Word (Grades 2-12). There are also two students with dyslexia also in comprehending what they read. programs, Phonics Boost and Phonics Blitz, should be systematic and cumulative, specifically designed for older emerging The International Dyslexia explicit, and include Association (2015) also states or struggling readers in Grades 3-12 that diagnostic teaching. that instruction for students require a slower teaching pace and more with dyslexia should be targeted practice with both phonemic systematic and cumulative, explicit, and include diagnostic teaching. Our instruction is systematic, explicit, and awareness and phonics concept tasks. multisensory. Student practice is cumulative and controlled. HD Word is also appropriate for older The easier, more foundational skills of phonological awareness, phonemic awareness (specifically segmenting students who need to quickly fill in gaps and
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroducing Dyslexia
    Reintroducing Dyslexia: Early Identification and Implications for Pediatric Practice Joseph Sanfilippo, MS, EdM,a,b Molly Ness, PhD,c Yaacov Petscher, PhD,d Leonard Rappaport, MD, MS,a,e Barry Zuckerman, MD,f,g Nadine Gaab, PhDa,e,h Dyslexia is a common learning disorder that renders children susceptible to abstract poor health outcomes and many elements of socioeconomic difficulty. It is commonly undiagnosed until a child has repeatedly failed to learn to read in aDivision of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children’s elementary school; this late diagnosis not only places the child at an academic Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; bSchool of Medicine, disadvantage but also can be a precursor to psychiatric comorbidities such as Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; cGraduate School of Education, Fordham anxiety and depression. Genetic and neuroimaging research have revealed University, New York, New York; dFlorida Center for Reading that dyslexia is heritable and that it is undergirded by brain differences that Research, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida; eDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Harvard are present even before reading instruction begins. Cognitive-behavioral University, Boston, Massachusetts; fDepartment of research has revealed that there are early literacy skill deficits that represent Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, fl Massachusetts; gBoston Medical Center, Boston, red ags for dyslexia risk and can be measured at a preschool age. Altogether, Massachusetts; and hHarvard Graduate School of Education, this evidence points to dyslexia as a disorder that can be flagged by Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts a pediatrician before school entry, during a period of heightened brain Drs Gaab, Rappaport, and Zuckerman conceptualized plasticity when interventions are more likely to be effective.
    [Show full text]
  • LRA Dyslexia Literacy Research Report 1.Pdf
    DYSLEXIA, LITERACY DIFFICULTIES AND INSTRUCTION Peter Johnston The University at Albany Donna Scanlon The Child Research and Study Center The University at Albany Literacy Research Association Literacy Research Report Draft October 28th, 2020 Request for comment This is a draft of a Literacy Research Report for the Literacy Research Association. We encourage LRA members to send constructive comment and critique to either author ([email protected] or [email protected]). We will attempt to engage any critique in the document's revision and in the presentation at LRA. Dyslexia, Literacy Difficulties anD Instruction There is no doubt that some children experience more difficulty than others becoming literate, often at great emotional, intellectual, social and economic cost, to themselves but also to those who love and care for them, and for society at large. The causes of those difficulties, and what to do about them, have been the source of vast research and sometimes heated disagreement among researchers and educators – disagreements that, in one form or another, go back well over a century. The current focus of this attention, from the media, some researchers, parents and politicians, is on the construct dyslexia – a term used to describe learners who experience extreme/serious difficulty with the word reading aspect of the reading process. In 2019 alone there were expositions about dyslexia on National Public Radio, the Public Broadcasting Service, The New York Times, Education Week, and numerous other major outlets, each asserting with certainty that dyslexia is a central cause of reading difficulty and asserting a singular instructional solution. Promoted by a coalition of certain researchers, parents, politicians, and private, for-profit and non-profit education entities, this proposed solution, which they refer to as “the science of reading” (SOR), calls for an approach to reading instruction for beginning and struggling readers that focuses on a particular, almost exclusively phonics-based, approach to developing skill with word identification.
    [Show full text]