The Protection of the Right to Refuse Unsafe Work: Human Rights and the Failure of Global Worker Health and Safety Policy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Protection of the Right to Refuse Unsafe Work: Human Rights and the Failure of Global Worker Health and Safety Policy THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO REFUSE UNSAFE WORK: HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE FAILURE OF GLOBAL WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jeffrey Arthur Hilgert May 2011 © 2011 Jeffrey Arthur Hilgert THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO REFUSE UNSAFE WORK: HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE FAILURE OF GLOBAL WORKER HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY Jeffrey Arthur Hilgert, Ph.D. Cornell University 2011 This dissertation is an in-depth case study of the right to refuse unsafe work under global labor and human rights standards. Using historical and legal research methods, it documents a false consensus surrounding the protection of the right to refuse unsafe work under ILO Convention No. 155, a key international labor convention on occupational safety and health. After introducing the topic, outlining a conceptual framework for the study of human rights in labor and employment relations, and placing the emergence of the right to refuse unsafe work as a global human rights issue in historical context, the study examines the jurisprudence and effectiveness of the dominant refusal rights model as advanced in current global worker health and safety policy. It chronicles how the political efforts of governments and employers counter-mobilized against stronger anti-discrimination protections for workers protesting their working conditions and how employer political activity resulted in the adoption and global diffusion of a restricted and inherently ineffective right to refuse labor protection. The dissertation presents implications for the international jurisprudence on workers‘ freedom of association, the labor activist debates about workers‘ rights as human rights, and the scholarly narrative regarding the rise of an individual employment rights era in contemporary labor and employment relations. Biographical Sketch Jeffrey Hilgert grew up in Renville County, Minnesota. After high school, he attended the University of Minnesota Duluth and graduated in 1996 with magna cum laude honors and a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science. He attended graduate school at the University of Massachusetts Amherst Labor Relations and Research Center and received a Master of Science in Labor Studies in 1999. He returned to Minnesota and worked for five years with a number of anti-poverty and workers‘ rights organizations, including the Damiano Center, the Workers‘ Rights Network of Northeast Minnesota, and Local 1116 of the United Food and Commercial Workers. Hilgert was awarded a fellowship for community leadership to continue his education by the Archibald Bush Foundation of St. Paul, Minnesota. In 2005, he started doctoral studies at the School of Industrial and Labor Relations at Cornell University. He received a Canada U.S. Fulbright Fellowship for 2009-2010 and did dissertation research as a visiting graduate research scholar at McGill University in Montréal. He joined the faculty of the École de relations industrielles at the Université de Montréal in 2011 as an assistant professor of santé et sécurité de travail. He is married to Gioconda Lopez Ayestas of Matagalpa, Nicaragua and they are the parents of two children, Arthur and Elena. iii I dedicate this dissertation to Gioconda, Arthur and Elena. Without your support and understanding this would not have been possible. I also dedicate this work to Clete Daniel, a friend and professor who served four years on my doctoral committee before his untimely death on April 18, 2010 and to the 2.2 million workers killed every year by work-related injuries and illnesses. iv Acknowledgements I acknowledge first and foremost my doctoral committee. Without the support of my committee chairperson James A. Gross, this dissertation would likely not have happened. His encouragement and experience were invaluable through my doctoral education. He has been both an incredible mentor and a good friend. Lowell Turner always offered me thoughtful and focused comments at key points as my dissertation developed. His critical questions and comments prompted me to hold a more critical analysis of the human rights worldview, always reminding me of the importance of power in labor relations. Risa Lieberwitz provided excellent insights into many of the legal and jurisprudential arguments made in this dissertation. I thank her for being supportive and always reminding me of the broader social importance of this research. Lance Compa suggested exploring the topic of the right to refuse unsafe work as a human right very early in my dissertation planning. I thank him for his advice, encouragement, and continued advancement of the study of international labor law. The staff of the Martin P. Catherwood Library at Cornell University has been very helpful throughout my doctoral research. My sincere gratitude goes to Gordon T. Law, Stuart Basefsky, Suzanne Cohen, Susan LaCette and the other Cornell librarians. Early in my doctoral program I was invited by Connor Gearty at the Centre for the Study of Human Rights at the London School of Economic and Political Science to present a conference paper on inter-disciplinarity in human rights scholarship. That working paper led to this dissertation. I am grateful for his advice and encouragement. My graduate education at Cornell was in part supported by the Archibald Bush Foundation of St. Paul, Minnesota and the Canada – United States Fulbright Program. While in Canada, Robert Hebdon at the Desautels Faculty of Management at McGill v University had graciously served as my supervisor while I was a Fulbright fellow. My transition to study in Canada was also made easier by Christopher Kirkey at the Center for the Study of Canada at SUNY Plattsburgh who invited me to participate in the July 2009 CONNECT Seminar in Ottawa for U.S.-based Canadian scholars. Thank you to the archivists at the Archives of Ontario for assistance with the archives of the Ontario Royal Commission on the Health and Safety of Workers in Mines, the archivists at Library and Archives Canada in Ottawa for archival help on the Canadian history with the ILO, and thanks to the Government Information Service collections staff at the Humanities and Social Sciences library at McGill University. The staff of the Office of the Whistleblower Protection Program at the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration was helpful in guiding my Freedom of Information Act request through the proper administrative channels. I am indebted to Nilgun Tolek and Michael Shanker for their professionalism and support. Bob Sass corresponded with me during the writing of this history and provided many insights about workers‘ health and safety activism in Canada since the 1970s. My gratitude to Larry Haiven at St. Mary‘s University in Halifax for introducing me to Bob Sass and arranging for us to meet at a conference in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. I thank Barney Glaser and the other participants in the 2008 Grounded Theory Troubleshooting Workshop in New York who each offered me very valuable insights. The ILO International Training Centre in Turin accepted my participation in a specialized training program on international labor standards in the early stages of my doctoral program. I learned a great deal from my colleagues in the course (A900614) who were from around the world. I especially remember my colleagues Kyaw Swa Pu with the ILO‘s liaison office in Myanmar and David Samuel with the Department of Labor in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The experts in the NORMES department are vi to be commended for their dedication to labor rights, many of whom helped inform this dissertation research either directly or through participating by video connection in courses on workers‘ rights at the Cornell ILR School. They include Catherine Brâkenhielm Hansell, Karen Curtis, Lee Swepston, Jean-Pierre Laviec, Jukka Takala, Seiji Machida, Michele Nahmias and Martin Oelz as well as a number of others. I acknowledge the faculty and doctoral students who participated in the ―CB‖ workshop at the Cornell ILR School from 2005-2010. Your presentations, questions, and comments at these workshops were always helpful and instructive to me. I thank faculty members Lee Adler, Richard Hurd, Rebecca Givan, Sarosh Kuruvilla, Alex Colvin, Kate Bronfenbrenner, Maria Cook and Kate Griffith. My gratitude extends to each of my doctoral student colleagues, including Maite Tapia, Sun Wook Chung, Jonathan Ying, Magdalena Hipp, Ariel Avgar, Chad Grey and Marco Hauptmeier. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the people that encouraged me to pursue a Ph.D. from the beginning. My friend Séamas Cain from Carlton County, Minnesota, a social activist, historian, and performance artist, was enthusiastic and encouraged my view that studying workers‘ rights was an essential endeavor. I reserve my deepest thanks and appreciation for my wife and partner, Gioconda. She has supported me and our family in countless ways throughout six years of graduate school at Cornell. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Biographical Sketch . iii Dedication . iv Acknowledgements . v Table of Contents . viii List of Tables . xi CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION The right to refuse unsafe work as a labor and employment relations problem 1.1. Studying conflict in the working environment 1 1.2. The right to refuse unsafe work 7 1.3. Human rights in labor and employment relations 15 1.4. Overall plan for the dissertation 35 CHAPTER II – THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Analyzing power, exclusion and influence under labor and human rights standards 2.1. Understanding labor rights policy in a market society 37 2.2. Contemporary theories of labor rights policy change 44 a. Individual rights consciousness 45 b. Shifting axes of social mobilization 50 c. A long exception from individualism 52 2.3. Employer political activity in labor and employment relations 55 2.4. The mobilization of bias and the institutional environment 61 2.5. Analyzing power, exclusion and influence 64 2.6. Effective human rights and the right to refuse unsafe work 75 viii CHAPTER III – HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Collective bargaining confronts a new generation of business activism 3.1.
Recommended publications
  • Telework in Belgium
    TELEWORK IN BELGIUM Sharing experiences & lowering thresholds PROF. DR. MICHEL WALRAVE — UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP COLOPHON Compiler University of Antwerp Faculty of Political & Social Sciences Department of Communication studies Research group Strategic Communication Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp (Wilrijk), Belgium Contact person: Prof. dr. Michel Walrave Tel: +32 3 820 28 75 Fax: +32 3 820 28 82 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ua.ac.be/michel.walrave e-privacy research: www.e-privacy.be e-work research: www.tijdvoortelewerk.be Author Prof. dr. Michel Walrave Responsible publisher David Mellaerts ESF-Agentschap Gasthuisstraat 31 (9e verdieping), 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: 02 546 22 36 Fax: 02 546 22 40 Revision Prof. dr. Michel Walrave Dra. Marijke De Bie Anka De Geyter Translation Dra. Marijke De Bie Anka De Geyter L.S. Translations Design Aanzet / Making Magazines, Ghent (Wilfrieda Paessens) Legal Deposit Number D/2005/10.326/2 1 INTRODUCTION . 7 2 EXPERIENCES WITH AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS TELEWORKING . 9 2.1 Belgium’s mid-position . 9 2.2 Profile of Belgian teleworkers and non-teleworkers . 1 3 2.2.1 Attitude towards teleworking types. 1 3 2.2.2 The desire of non-teleworkers . 1 6 2.2.3 Factors affecting interest in teleworking . 1 7 2.2.4 To want, to be able and to be allowed . 1 8 2.3 Factors affecting teleworking experience . 2 0 3 LEGAL ASPECTS . 2 5 3.1 Homeworking Act . 2 5 3.2 Welfare at Work Act . 3 0 3.3 General health and safety regulations at work .
    [Show full text]
  • Personality Traits As Risk Factors for Occupational Injury in Health Care Workers
    PERSONALITY TRAITS AS RISK FACTORS FOR OCCUPATIONAL INJURY IN HEALTH CARE WORKERS By HILARY STEVENS MORGAN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2007 1 © 2007 Hilary Stevens Morgan 2 To my parents who always stressed the value of education and instilled in their children a belief that anything was possible 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Nancy Nivison Menzel, for her guidance, encouragement, and patience throughout this research study. I appreciate her knowledge of occupational health nursing and her commitment to provide leadership for this study despite moving over 2,000 miles westward. I gratefully acknowledge and extend my appreciation to the members of my committee, Jo Snider, PhD, Jiunn-Jye Sheu, PhD, and James V. Jessup, PhD. Each of them provided unique talents, time, and moral support during this study. I would like to thank Dr. Snider for her support during my struggles understanding psychology, Dr. Sheu for his patience in dealing with my epidemiology and study design questions and Dr. Jessup for his calm and encouragement in my moments of doubt. I also want to thank Seaborn Hunt, MD for his support of my returning to school. I know my absences in the office for school activities presented an additional burden on him, but he never wavered in his encouragement of my endeavors. The same appreciation is extended to Paula Murphy, Kathy Sandor, Ronnie Maxim, Vickie Hall, Milly Wilkinson and Renee' Brown who tolerated, with good graces, my vacillating moods throughout this long process.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 11. Recording & Reporting of Occupational Injuries & Illnesses
    MIOSHA-STD-1501 (09/21) For further information 32 Pages Ph: 517-284-7740 www.michigan.gov/mioshastandards DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE MIOSHA SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD Filed with the Secretary of State on February 25, 1976 (as amended May 7, 1979) (as amended November 15, 1983) (as amended December 17,1986) (as amended June 6, 2000) (as amended December 12, 2001) (as amended November 25, 2002) (as amended May 20, 2015) (as amended November 10, 2016) (as amended September 12, 2019) (as amended September 16, 2021) These rules take effect immediately upon filing with the secretary of state unless adopted under section 33, 44, or 45a(9) of the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.233, 24.244, or 24.245a. Rules adopted under these sections become effective 7 days after filing with the secretary of state. (By authority conferred on the department of labor and economic opportunity by section 69 of the Michigan occupational safety and health act, 1974 PA 154, MCL 408.1069, and Executive Reorganization Order Nos. 1996 2, 2003 1, 2008 4, 2011 4, and 2019-3, MCL 445.2001, 445.2011, 445.2025, 445.2030, and 125.1998) R 408.22102a, R 408.22103, R 408.22104, R 408.22107, R 408.22133, R 408.22151, and R 408.22156 of the Michigan Administrative Code are amended, as follows: PART 11. RECORDING AND REPORTING OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES Table of Contents: R 408.22101 Scope. ....................................................... 2 R 408.22113 Recording criteria for needlestick R 408.22102 Intent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contract As Social Artifact Mark C. Suchman
    91 The Contract as Social Artifact Mark C. Suchman This article outlines a distinctive, albeit not entirely unprecedented, research agenda for the sociolegal study of contracts. In the past, law and society scholars have tended to examine contracts either through the intellectual history of contract doctrine ‘‘on the books’’ or through the empirical study of how real-world exchange relations are governed ‘‘in action.’’ Although both of these traditions have contributed greatly to our understanding of contract law, neither has devoted much attention to the most distinctive concrete product of contractual transactionsFcontract documents themselves. Without denying the value of studying either contract doctrine or relational governance, this article argues that contract documents are independently interesting social artifacts and that they should be studied as such. As social artifacts, contracts possess both technical and symbolic properties, and the sociolegal study of contract-as-artifact can profitably apply prevailing social scientific theories of technology and symbolism to understand both: (1) the microdynamics of why and how transacting parties craft individual contract devices, and (2) the macrodynamics of why and how larger social systems generate and sustain distinctive contract regimes. Seen in this light, the microdynamics of contract implicate ‘‘technical’’ theories of transaction cost engineering and private lawmaking, and ‘‘symbolic’’ theories of ceremony and gesture. In a parallel fashion, the macrodynamics of contract implicate ‘‘technical’’ theories of innovation diffusion, path dependence, and technology cycles, and ‘‘symbolic’’ theories of ideology, legitimacy, and communication. Together, these micro and macro explorations suggest that contract artifacts may best be understood as scripts and signalsFcollections of symbols designed to yield technically efficacious practical action when interpreted by culture-bearing social actors within the context of preexisting vocabularies and conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • World Developments in Social Security
    World Developments in Social Security by CARL H. FARMAN* term risks of income loss resulting Almost without exception the nations of the world are com- from old age, invalidity (of nonoccu- mitted to programs of social security-programs that vary from pational origin), and death of the country to country but have in common the establishment of worker are most commonly met protection, generally through compulsory social insurance, against such risks as sickness and the economic consequences through a system of contributory old- age, invalidity, and survivors insur- of unemployment, disability, old age, and death. The follow- ing survey, based largely on a longer report.1 is an attempt to ance, in which benefits are provided show in broad outline the evolution in such legislation for the without an income test to persons who years 1939-49 and the extent and general character of such pro- meet the qualifying requirements. In grams at the end of that time. a number of countries pensions are paid to all aged, disabled, or survivor claimants with insufllcient means, NE of the most widely shared Soon after the beginning of the war, provided they meet citizenship or resi- objectives of the people of the many countries enacted legislation dence requirements. Such pensions 0 world in the mid-twentieth that either created new systems or subject to income test are the only century is social security. The sys- (more frequently) fundamentally benefits in Australia, Canada, Den- tems of social insurance and assist- amended programs already in exist- mark, Norway, Spain, and the Union ance that constitute the common ence.
    [Show full text]
  • Law-And-Economics Approaches to Labour and Employment Law Stewart J
    Cornell University Law School Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 3-2017 Law-and-Economics Approaches to Labour and Employment Law Stewart J. Schwab Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the Law and Economics Commons Recommended Citation Stewart J. Schwab, "Law-and-Economics Approaches to Labour and Employment Law," 33 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations (2017) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Law-and-Economics Approaches to Labour and Employment Law * Stewart J. SCHWAB This article describes the distinctive approaches that law and economics takes to labour and employment law. The article distinguishes between ‘economic analysis of law’ and ‘law and economics’, with the former applying economic models to generally simple legal rules while the latter blends messier institutional detail with legal and economic thought. The article describes three eras of law-and-economics scholarship, recognizing that economics teaches that markets work and markets fail. Era One emphasizes that labour laws and mandatory employment rules might reduce overall social welfare by preventing a benefit or term from going to the party that values it most highly. Era Two emphasizes that labour and employment laws might enhance overall social welfare by correcting market failures arising from monopsony power, externalities, public goods, asymmetric information, information-processing heuristics, and internal labour markets.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 WEBINAR OUTLINE (Workers' Compensation) ILLINOIS
    Chicago, IL Springfield, IL St. Louis, MO Overland Park, KS (312) 346-5310 (217) 726-0037 (314) 231-0770 (913) 221-0740 Indianapolis, IN Omaha, NE Milwaukee, WI (317) 204-4627 (402) 933-8851 (414) 273-3133 COVID-19 WEBINAR OUTLINE (Workers’ Compensation) ILLINOIS I. Amendment to the Illinois Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act. i. Illinois House Bill 2455 On June 5, 2020, Governor Pritzker signed Illinois House Bill 2455 into law which amended the Illinois Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act (820 ILCS 310/1) by adding Section 1(g) which creates an ordinary rebuttable presumption for first-responders, front-line workers, and employees of essential businesses who contracted COVID-19. The Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act was not amended. The Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act is designed to address injuries that are caused or aggravated by accidental injuries or traumas. However, the Illinois Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act is designed to create remedies for employees that are caused or aggravated by a gradual insidious process. ii. Amended Statutory Provisions. The rebuttable presumption applies to all cases tried after the effective date of the amendment, and in which the diagnosis of COVID-19 was made on or after March 9, 2020 and on or before December 31, 2020. If the employee’s injury or occupational disease resulted from exposure to and contraction of the COVID-19 virus, the exposure and the contraction shall be rebuttably presumed to have arisen out of and in the course of the employee’s first-responder or front-line worker employment, and further that the injury or disease shall be rebuttably presumed to be causally connected to the hazards or the exposure of that employment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Informer
    Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF FORMER PARLIMENTARIANS SUMMER 2017 Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. SUMMER 2017 Table Of Contents Interview: Leona Dombrowsky Page 3 Interview: Steve Mahoney Page 5 Obituary: Gerry Martiniuk Page 8 AGM Recap Page 10 Hugh O’Neil Frienship Garden Page 11 Interview: Bill Murdoch Page 13 Interview: Phil Gillies Page 16 Interview: Sharon Murdock Page 19 Interview: Rolando P. Vera Rodas Page 21 Ceremonial Flag Raising Area Page 23 Margaret Campbell Page 24 Tributes Page 26 Contact Us Page 27 2 Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. Interview: Leona Dombrowsky M. P. P. Liberal, Cabinet Minister Hastings-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington 1999-2007 Prince Edward-Hastings 2007-2011 “It is critical to have an understanding that everything we do has an impact, either positive or negative on the environment.” Leona Dombrowsky’s interest in politics started with dinner table talk when she was young. While her parents were not involved in partisan politics, they were always interested in the issues of the day and hence Leona, growing up in the French Settlement north of Tweed, developed an interest in politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Labour Law Need Philosophical Foundations? (Introduction)
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2018 Does Labour Law Need Philosophical Foundations? (Introduction) Hugh Collins Oxford University All Souls College, [email protected] Gillian L. Lester Columbia Law School, [email protected] Virginia Mantouvalou University College London, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Hugh Collins, Gillian L. Lester & Virginia Mantouvalou, Does Labour Law Need Philosophical Foundations? (Introduction), PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF LABOUR LAW, HUGH COLLINS, GILLIAN LESTER & VIRGINIA MANTOUVALOU, EDS., OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2018 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2534 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction: Does Labour Law Need Philosophical Foundations? Hugh Collins,* Gillian Lester** and Virginia Mantouvalou*** Philosophical foundations of labour law is emerging as a new field of scholarship. As far as we know, a book on this subject has not yet been published, though in recent years several exploratory articles and book chapters have directly addressed the theme.1 In addition, some monographs that engage with philosophy have examined aspects of labour law such as dismissal, the statutory minimum wage, freedom of association, recognition of trade unions for the purpose of collective bargaining, and the right to work.2 Building on those initiatives, this collection of essays tries to develop a philosophical perspective on the subject of labour law as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Power and Individual Rights in the Collective Agreement •Fi a Comparison of Swedish and American
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 72 JANUARY 1963 NUMBER 3 COLLECTIVEPOWER AND INDIVIDUALRIGHTS IN THE COLLECTIVEAGREEMENT-A COMPARISON OF SWEDISHAND AMERICANLAW CLYDEW.SUMMERSt ONE of the central problems inherent in collective bargaining is defining the relative rights of the individual and the organizations in fixing and enforcing the terms and conditions of employment. Both Sweden and the United States have confronted this problem in its most insistent form, for in both countries government relies upon free collective bargaining as an instrument for regulat- ing the labor market. Both countries by statute protect the right to organize and bargain collectively; both require recognition of unions and compel nego- tiations; and both make collective agreements legally enforceable. This public reliance on collective bargaining and legal protection of its processes imposes on the law a pressing obligation to define the status of the individual under the collective agreement. Both countries have rejected the simple solution of giving the organization total dominance and wholly submerging the individual. Deeply rooted beliefs in the importance of the individual, and the desire to preserve for him some measure of independence have compelled the law to confront the difficult prob- lem of accommodating the rights of the individual and the rights of the collec- tive parties. The efforts in the two countries to resolve this problem provide interesting parallels and contrasts which illuminate the problem and suggest the range of possible solutions. In the United States, the dominant pattern of collective bargaining, and the stereotype on which the law is built, is bargaining between a union and a single employer.' The problem of individual rights is therefore conceived solely in tProfessor of Law, Yale Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contents of an Employment Contract
    The Contents of an Employment Contract By law an employer must provide their employees with details of their employment terms and conditions. This can be verbal or in writing, short or long, but is best achieved by an employer issuing a detailed written Contract of Employment to its employees. This Contract of Employment specifies an employee's duties and responsibilities, so an employee knows exactly what is expected of them, and what they can expect from their employer. Contents of a Contract of Employment The following provides a brief outline of what should be included within a Contract of Employment. This list should be tailored to suit the needs of the employer and the industry in which the company operates. Names and Addresses of the Parties The employers company details and the employees’ full name and address. Employment Contract Start Date The start date of the employment. Employee's Job Title and Description The employees’ job title and a description of the common day to day duties which will be carried out by the employee, plus any additional duties the employee may be expected to perform. Place of Work The employment contract allows the employer to specify the location where the employee will work. Hours of Work The employee's normal hours of work are specified within the employment contract. Details of possible out of hours work must also be included together with levels of overtime payments. Working hours cannot exceed the 48 hours per week as specified by the Working Time Regulations, unless the employee has signed a voluntary opt out from the Regulations.
    [Show full text]