DOCSLIB.ORG

CFD Assisted Design and Experimental Testing of a Wingsail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CFD Assisted Design and Experimental Testing of a Wingsail Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X CFD assisted design and experimental testing of a wingsail with high lift devices Y. Noguchi, D.W. Atkins Mechanical 1 Introduction Wingsails are solid aerofoil sections and create lift/thrust in the same manner as a conventional soft sail. During the late 70's and early 80's the cost of crude oil rose sharply. As a result of this, the U.S. Maritime Administration (MARAD) commissioned a report entitled 'Wind propulsion for the ships of the American merchant marine' |1]. This report tested seven 'Wind Assist' devices and scored each on various aspects. Of the hardware alternatives examined, wingsails offer the greatest potential. To optimise wing sail performance, the maximum thrust is required from a given wingsail area. To accomplish this, high lift devices at both leading and trailing edges may be used as are used in aircraft wings. An aircraft wing is only required to create a lift in one direction, whereas a wingsail must be able to operate with the flow coming from any direction and therefore is required to be symmetrical. Another unique feature for wing sail is the optimisation of many operating incidences when the drag of the wing section combines in the forward thrust produced by the wingsail as shown in fig.l. The aim of this project is to design a wingsail with high lift devices which will create the maximum thrust, for the majority of wingsail operating conditions, thus allowing maximum thrust. Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X 188 Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 2 Past Experiments To test the viability of the symmetrical leading edge high lift device, a wind tunnel model was constructed and tested as shown in fig.2. A standard NACA 0010 section was used for the slat and a NACA 0018 for the main wing. The slat section chosen fulfilled the compromise between the required thinness and structural integrity. The wing section was chosen for a relatively large radius of curvature at the nose, well known stall characteristics and the increased efficiency derived from operating a flap with a thicker wing section, as shown in Abbott & Doenhoff [2|. The slat-chord:wing-chord ratio was chosen to be 1:5, the normal ratio for an aircraft slat/wing configuration. This model showed that a leading edge symmetrical slat did indeed augment lift as show in fig.3. The difficulty was optimising the correct slat section, wing section combination and the slat-chord:wing-chord ratio. 3 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Initial Tests To construct and test a model takes 8 weeks. On the other hand using a CFD to numerically change the geometrical profile of an aerofoil is easier and a computation takes 3 days. Therefore, a decision was made to use the CFD as a design tool. A commercially available CFD package is used to avoid time consuming development for a purpose built CFD code. The package uses the Finite Element Method (FEM). FEM offers more geometric flexibility than other methods. A K-e turbulence model originally developed by Launder and Spalding [3] is also implemented. The package has no option to switch on/off the model at a specific point. Therefore, the boundary layer is treated as turbulent from the leading edge. 3.1 Mesh Tests A mesh test was carried out to find an optimum mesh system. Two mesh shapes, a H-mesh and an O-mesh, were used in the tests, applied to a NACA 0009 aerofoil. Three mesh densities were used; coarse (8000 nodes), medium (12000 nodes) and dense (20000 nodes). Of the two mesh types, the O-mesh was selected for having a very low ratio of distorted elements, 25% faster solution convergence and a very efficient mesh distribution. A difference of less than 2% on lift and drag was found between the 12000 & 20000 node solutions. The dense mesh increases computation time by 2 days and requires an additional 6 Mbytes of memory. It was therefore decided to use a medium density mesh. Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 189 3.2 Flat Plate Tests The accuracy of the software's boundary layer prediction was tested next, using a flat plate model. The flat plate was tested at a Reynolds number based on the chord length of IE* per metre. Only 6% of Cf and displacement/momentum thickness variation from the theory was found and thought to be satisfactory. 3.3 Aerofoil Section Tests Software verification was then continued by testing a standard NACA 0018 section with an identical Re number 3.2E* to that used in the original NACA test f4]. Fig.4. shows that although lift and drag are both over estimated by the computational method, the lift and drag trends for the aerofoil section are predicted correctly. 3.4 Comparison with Previous Measurements Further testing was then performed, to compare the behaviour of the experimental slat model, with a computational model at the matching Reynolds number. The computational model again predicted the correct lift and drag trend found from the experiment as shown in fig.5. However, the magnitude of the forces was again overestimated. This overestimation is thought to be due to discrepancies in the transition from laminar to turbulent boundary layer, turbulence treatment and the 3-dimensional effects. 3.5 Conclusion from Tests The results from this comprehensive validation exercise have given confidence that the CFD package correctly predicts the trend of the lift and drag forces for a multi element aerofoil, although not the magnitude of these forces. The package can now be used to predict the optimum multi-element aerofoil design combination for the wingsail. 4 Design Procedure/Comparisons The CFD package is utilized fully to test the variables. They are; i) Slat section ii) Wing section iii) Flap section iv) Slat:Wing:Flap section ratio v) Slat:Wing:Flap chord ratio Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X 190 Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements To achieve this, the following tests were run, using the experimental Reynolds number of IE*. Wing:Flap section thickness ratio was first tested, to discover the optimum ratio. The ratio of the wing:flap chord lengths were then tested. Following that the slat section thickness was tested and then finally the ratio of slat chord to wing chord. 5 Final Model Design The result of this testing provided the optimum configuration of slat:wing:flap chord ratio and slat:wing chord thickness/chord (t/c) values for the wingsail. Shown in the fig.6. Fig.7. shows the lift and drag coefficients of the original NACA 0018 section, with leading edge device only, trailing edge device only and both high lift devices. It shows an increase in lift by 130% when compared with NACA 0018, 95% over leading edge device only and 43% over trailing edge device only. It is known that the Cl achieved with the section is overestimated, it is estimated that an actual lift coefficient of Cl = 2.4 will be achieved. 6 Concluding Remarks The project aim, to optimise the design of a wingsail with symmetrical high lift devices was fulfilled. The large number of possible design configurations lead to the introduction of a commercially available CFD package. Initial tests of the CFD package showed the capability to predict the trend, but not the magnitude of aerofoil performance. The final design improved lift by 130% when compared with the original NACA 0018, 95% over a leading edge device only and 43% over trailing edge device only. Showing that even a commercially available CFD package can be an effective and time saving tool for wingsail design. Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 191 T- THRUST U-BOAT SPEED L - SAIL LIFT D - SAIL DRAG w H - HEELING FORCE V - APPARENT WINDSPEED W - TRUE WINDSPEED R - RESULTANT SAIL FORCE p- APPARENT WIND ANGLE Figure 1 PIVOT POINT OVERLAP SYMMETRICAL SLAT DESIGN STANDARD SLAT DESIGN Figure 2 Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X 192 Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements SYMMETRIC,M SLAT TEST 1 O Cl&Cd re. ALPHA /\ -7 1 .£. V. / Cd (WING + SL AT) 0.6 1 ^ \ Cl (WING+SLAT) -0.5 0.8 Cd (WING) X -0.4 -=- ^x 0.6 0 Cl (WING) X/^ I 8 0.4 0.1 0.2 0 0^ -0.1 -U.<f\ o: ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '>!•<>'< _ -\J.£r« o. 0^ 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 ALPHA Figure 3 CFD vs NACA - AEROFOIL CHARS. NACA 0018 SECTION AT Re 3.2E6 1Q S\ ff- .O u.u 1.6 Cl (CFD) . " 0.5 1.4- Cd (C FD) " w * • 1.2 -0.4 Cl (NACN * * *"* O Cd (fvJACA) * -0.3 S 0.8 * u " * * * 0.6 + n -0.2 0.4 - " . % •> " -0.1 0.2- * * n* * c ° 0-a+ a a a ft 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 ALPHA Figure 4 Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 193 Cl vs INCIDENCE (CFD vs EXPERIMENTAL) AT VARIOUS SLAT ANGLES (DEG) ^.3 21 DEG (CFD) 2 » * * 16 DEG (CFD) 9 1.5 21 DEG (EXP) 0 1 16 DEG (EXP) . * a„ c- " A 0.5 s s * " * "HIf 5 10 15 20 25 3C ALPHA Figure 5 FINAL AEROFOIL SECTION DESIGN THICKNESS/CHORD (Vc) RATIO 15:18:15 % WING CHORD RATIO 3:12:8 Figure 6 Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, © 1995 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X 194 Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements Cl/Cd vs INCIDENCE (CFD) 15 DEG INCIDENCE (Re 1E6) 3.5-t PI AIM WING WING & FLAP WING & SLAT SLAT/WING/FLAP ANGLE Figure 7 7 Acknowledgements This project is supported by Engineering Physical Science Research Council, U.K.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rigid Wing Sailboats: a State of the Art Survey Manuel F
    Ocean Engineering 187 (2019) 106150 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng Review Rigid wing sailboats: A state of the art survey Manuel F. Silva a,b,<, Anna Friebe c, Benedita Malheiro a,b, Pedro Guedes a, Paulo Ferreira a, Matias Waller c a Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal b INESC TEC, Campus da Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal c Åland University of Applied Sciences, Neptunigatan 17, AX-22111 Mariehamn, Åland, Finland ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The design, development and deployment of autonomous sustainable ocean platforms for exploration and Autonomous sailboat monitoring can provide researchers and decision makers with valuable data, trends and insights into the Wingsail largest ecosystem on Earth. Although these outcomes can be used to prevent, identify and minimise problems, Robotics as well as to drive multiple market sectors, the design and development of such platforms remains an open challenge. In particular, energy efficiency, control and robustness are major concerns with implications for autonomy and sustainability. Rigid wingsails allow autonomous boats to navigate with increased autonomy due to lower power consumption and increased robustness as a result of mechanically simpler control compared to traditional sails. These platforms are currently the subject of deep interest, but several important research problems remain open. In order to foster dissemination and identify future trends, this paper presents a survey of the latest developments in the field of rigid wing sailboats, describing the main academic and commercial solutions both in terms of hardware and software.
    [Show full text]
  • An Autonomous Wing-Sailed Catamaran Ph.D.Thesis by Gabriel H. Elkaim the Wingsail Wingsail Description Wing Versus Sail
    An Autonomous Wing-Sailed Catamaran Ph.D.Thesis by Gabriel H. Elkaim The following information has been extracted from the thesis submitted by Dr. Gabriel Elkaim to Stanford University, and for which he was awarded his Ph.D. The full thesis, which can be viewed at http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/~elkaim/Documents/GabrielElkaimThesis01.pdf (and an extract published in the AYRS’s Journal ‘Catalyst’ which can be found at http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/~elkaim/Documents/Catalyst_BoatArticle.pdf), describes the Atlantis project, whose aim was the design, development, and experimental testing of an autonomous wind- propelled marine craft. The parts printed here are the ones which may be of interest to members of the JRA These extracts are re-published from the AYRS Journal “Catalyst” by kind permission of Dr. Gabriel and of the Amateur Yacht Research Society. Please note that the figures are numbered as in the original document. The Wingsail The most visibly unique aspect of the Atlantis project is the wingsail propulsion system, as shown in Figure 5-1. The design considerations and goals are: equivalent performance to the original sail system, low actuation force, and the ability to precisely control the resulting system. A sloop rig sail can achieve a maximum lift coefficient of 0.8 if the jib and sail are perfectly trimmed. Realistically, an operating maximum lift coefficient is 0.6. The design goal of the Atlantis wing is to achieve a maximum lift coefficient of 1.8. Since this allows the wing to generate three times the force of an equivalently sized sail, the wing area is reduced to one third of the area of the original sails.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Devels'nent Ofthe Tunny
    FURTHERDEVELS'NENT OF THETUNNY RIG E M H GIFFORDANO C PALNER Gi f ford and P art ners Carlton House Rlngwood Road Hoodl ands SouthamPton S04 2HT UK 360 1, lNTRODUCTION The idea of using a wing sail is not new, indeed the ancient junk rig is essentially a flat plate wing sail. The two essential characteristics are that the sail is stiffened so that ft does not flap in the wind and attached to the mast in an aerodynamically balanced way. These two features give several important advantages over so called 'soft sails' and have resulted in the junk rig being very successful on traditional craft. and modern short handed-cruising yachts. Unfortunately the standard junk rig is not every efficient in an aer odynamic sense, due to the presence of the mast beside the sai 1 and the flat shapewhich results from the numerousstiffening battens. The first of these problems can be overcomeby usi ng a double ski nned sail; effectively two junk sails, one on either side of the mast. This shields the mast from the airflow and improves efficiency, but it still leaves the problem of a flat sail. To obtain the maximumdrive from a sail it must be curved or cambered!, an effect which can produce over 5 more force than from a flat shape. Whilst the per'formanceadvantages of a cambered shape are obvious, the practical way of achieving it are far more elusive. One line of approach is to build the sail from ri gid componentswith articulated joints that allow the camberto be varied Ref 1!.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Study of a Two-Elements Wingsail for High Performance Multihull Yachts
    Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte ( OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID: 15683 To cite this version : Chapin, Vincent and Gourdain, Nicolas and Verdin, Nicolas and Fiumara, Alessandro and Senter, Julien Aerodynamic study of a two-elements wingsail for high performance multihull yachts. (2015) In: High Performance Yacht Design, 10 March 2015 - 12 March 2015 (Auckland, New Zealand). (Unpublished) Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] 5th High Performance Yacht Design Conference Auckland, 10-12 March, 2015 AERODYNAMIC STUDY OF A TWO-ELEMENTS WINGSAIL FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE MULTIHULL YACHTS Vincent Chapin1, Nicolas Gourdain2, Nicolas Verdin3, Alessandro Fiumara4, Julien Senter5 Corresponding author : [email protected] Abstract. this paper is devoted to the numerical study of a 1:20th model-scale wingsail typical of America’s Cup yachts like AC72, AC62, AC45 or any C class catamaran to gain insight in its complex aerodynamic behavior and to prepare a wind-tunnel campain. This rigging has still not been much studied and needs more knowledge. This study is based on CFD simulations of the flow around the wingsail by resolving Navier-Stokes equations. Two modeling issues are investigated: the Unsteady Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (URANS) and the Large Eddy Simulation (LES). These numerical approaches are used to characterize the wingsail aerodynamic behavior and variations with some key design and trim parameters (camber, slot width, angle of attack, flap thickness).
    [Show full text]
  • Developed Specifically Around the Semi Rigid Wing Sail, the K8 Sport Claims to Be a 'Game Changing' Design. ANDI ROBERTSON S
    K8 SPORT BOAT TEST GAME CHANGER Developed specifically around the Semi UNDER SAIL 9/10 Rigid Wing sail, the K8 Sport claims to be a «««««««««« ‘game changing’ design. ANDI ROBERTSON sifts through the rhetoric and finds 1 2 real substance behind the claim ANDI ROBERTSON ALL IMAGES: his three-to-four person is effectively nearly eliminated and the Narrow static waterlines are achieved by 1. The spinnaker HULL AND DECK 8/10 the big, open cockpit, the cutouts for the is on a single SPECIFICATIONS lifting keelboat turns design wing section creates a proportionately slab sides and a gently curved bottom line and so is «««««««««« radiused main track and the pod for the LOA: 7.99m Displacement: 900kg convention on its head. faster, more attached and smoother section. Form stability is a primary easy to hoist The hull has a very powerful form main controls. Sailing with four there is Beam: 2.55m Mainsail: 29sq m Boasting the world’s flow over the foil. Camber control goal, that means the boat is sailed legs 2. The small, with chunky forward sections and the plenty of space to work, albeit slightly self-tacking jib Draught: 2.1m Jib: 12sq m first production is easily and smoothly achieved. in by the four crew, maximising appeal is the result of beam carried quite far forward. The more static work than say the SB20 or Raised keel: 1.65m Asymmetric: 78sq m Tsemo-rigid wing sail, the hull has The benefits in performance and to experienced owners who no longer much testing chine runs full length, right into the Melges or J80, where it is all about crew been designed to optimise the power handling are significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Summary
    Design Summary School/Firm: Autonomous Marine Systems Boat Name: Robotboat “Kristen D” Team Members: Walter Holemans Faculty Advisors: NA Length: 2.03 m (80 in) Beam: 1.27 m (50 in) Displacement: 45.4 kg (100 lb) Draft: 0.36 m (14 in) Sail Area: 0.56 m2 (6 ft2) Team History: Walter Holemans has been designing robotboats for 15 years as a hobby and now as a company Autonomous Marine Systems (AMS) Boat Design Summary: Catamaran, fiberglass epoxy foam hulls, printed ABS wing sail. Speed ~ 3 Kts Navigation System Summary: Use GPS, magnetic heading and wind vector to control rudder. Sail Control System Summary: Sail is controlled by a weathervane through a cam. There is no electronic actuator for the sail. The sail does not stow Design Summary School/Firm: Queen’s University Boat Name: North Star Team Members: Marc Burnie, Nick Roberts, James Allison, Jon King, Ricky Hogervorst Faculty Advisors: Dr. Mike Birk Length: 2 m (78.7 in) Beam: 0.4 m (15.7 in) Displacement: 21.5kg (47.4 lb) Draft: 1.5 m (59 in) Sail Area: 2.3 m2 (24.8 ft2) Team History: MAST was founded in 2004 as a result of the absence of a naval architecture and mechatronics design team on campus. MAST became a competitive team after UBC approached Queen’s about hosting a competition for autonomous sailing vessels. The first competition, Sailbot, took place a year afterwards; hosted by MAST at Queen’s University. The first MAST vessel that was entered in the competition was “Black Adder” which used a 2 meter carbon fiber hull and used a PBASIC Stamp for the control system.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbosails, Etc
    ENERGY EFFICIENT SHIPPING Western Joint Branch Lecture 7th December 2020, On-line John Buckingham, Chief Mechanical Engineer BMT Presenter John Buckingham CEng FIMechE, is the Chief Mechanical Engineer of BMT Defence & Security UK Limited, Bath, UK. John was the Chief Technologist for the ETI-funded Vessel Technology Assessment System project. John leads studies into marine power and propulsion, air-conditioning and hydraulics within the company and has published several papers on these John Buckingham subjects. Since 1999, John has been involved in a range VTAS Chief Technologist of studies to assess the utility of EST for the BMT Chief Mechanical commercial and military marine. Engineer Other principal contributors to this work: David Pearson, (Engineering) Jeremy Atkins & Cathy Ingram (Hullform CFD) & Beth Storey & Will Hopes (TS CFD) (All BMT) VTAS Team General Trends in the EST market 4 VTAS A teaming of BMT and Black & Veatch Objectives To promote the acceleration and adoption of Energy Saving Technologies (EST) in global shipping to reduce GHG emissions. To provide ship owners, operators, charterers, financiers and EST OEMs with independent and trusted knowledge that assists them in justifying investment in ESTs and their usage strategies. Provides customers with the information to make sound business decisions VTAS BMT and Black & Veatch strengths BMT: Marine engineering & naval architecture design and analysis, asset lease modelling Black & Veatch: Port infrastructure, LNG, stakeholder engagement, financial & risk modelling Provides customers with the information to make sound business decisions Energy Saving Technologies The challenge - 1 • Ship owners want to save money & reduce their environmental footprint. • The focus is on operational efficiency: spending scarce capital funds to save fuel is always subject to high scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Analysis of a C-Class-Like Catamaran in Simplified
    an author's https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/20807 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.008 Fiumara, Alessandro and Gourdain, Nicolas and Chapin, Vincent and Senter, Julien Aerodynamic analysis of a C- class-like catamaran in simplified unsteady wind conditions using LES and URANS modeling. (2018) Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 180. 262-275. ISSN 0167-6105 Aerodynamic analysis of a C-class-like catamaran in simplified unsteady wind conditions using LES and URANS modeling Alessandro Fiumara a,*, Nicolas Gourdain b, Vincent Chapin b, Julien Senter c a Assystem Technologies and ISAE-Supaero, Toulouse, France b ISAE-Supaero, Toulouse, France c Assystem Technologies, Toulouse, France 1. Introduction shapes in unsteady flow conditions, like flapped wings, and are largely exploited by insects and flying animals to enhance their flying capa- The interest for wingsails has grown since their introduction on bilities (Maxworthy, 1979; Ellington et al., 1996; Muijres et al., 2008). America's Cup catamarans in 2013. Wingsails enhance the yacht per- On bat wings, the increase in lift due to the LEV is of 40% (Muijres formance thanks to the achievement of larger lift-to-drag ratio and et al., 2008). LEVs are also exploited in the aeronautic field to increase maximum lift coefficients with respect to soft sails. However, the the lift of delta wings. In the naval domain, (Viola and larger aerodynamic forces acting on the wingsail can compromise the Arredondo-Galeana, 2017), performing PIV experimental tests, stability of the yacht during navigation especially in unsteady condi- observed and analyzed the formation of LEV on a soft spinnaker tions, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • C-Class Catamaran Wing Performance Optimisation
    C-CLASS CATAMARAN WING PERFORMANCE OPTIMISATION A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences 2011 By Nils Haack School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering Contents Abstract5 Declaration6 Acknowledgements8 1 Introduction9 1.1 Aims.................................. 11 1.2 Objectives............................... 12 2 Literature Review 13 2.1 Wingsails............................... 13 2.1.1 C-Class Catamaran development - the history of the class 13 2.1.2 Wingsail occurrence in other sailing classes......... 16 2.1.3 Wingsail research....................... 16 2.2 Physics of sailing........................... 20 2.2.1 Wind: velocity variations with height............ 20 2.2.2 Apparent wind........................ 21 2.2.3 Righting moment....................... 23 2.2.4 Forces on a boat....................... 24 2.2.5 Boat performance requirement for fleet and match racing. 26 2.2.6 Sailing upwind........................ 26 2.2.7 Downwind sailing....................... 28 2.2.8 Summary of wingsail requirements for a C-Class catamaran 29 2.3 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)............... 30 2.3.1 Governing equations..................... 30 2.4 Near wall flows............................ 31 2.4.1 Flow physics.......................... 31 2 2.4.2 Modelling of the near wall flows............... 32 2.4.3 Grid requirements....................... 34 2.5 Turbulence modelling......................... 35 2.5.1 Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS).......... 36 2.5.2 Reynolds stresses....................... 37 2.5.3 The k − model....................... 39 2.5.4 The SST k − ! model.................... 40 2.5.5 Choosing a turbulence model................ 40 2.6 Finite volume method........................ 42 2.6.1 Interpolation......................... 43 2.6.2 Discretisation........................
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Investigation of a Two-Element Wingsail for Ship Auxiliary Propulsion
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Numerical Investigation of a Two-Element Wingsail for Ship Auxiliary Propulsion Chen Li 1,2,3,*, Hongming Wang 2,3 and Peiting Sun 1 1 Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China; [email protected] 2 College of Marine, Electrical and Intelligent Engineering, Jiangsu Maritime Institute, Nanjing 211170, China; [email protected] 3 Jiangsu Ship Energy-Saving Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 211170, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 March 2020; Accepted: 1 May 2020; Published: 9 May 2020 Abstract: The rigid wingsail is a new type of propulsion equipment which greatly improves the performance of the sailboat under the conditions of upwind and downwind. However, such sail-assisted devices are not common in large ships because the multi-element wingsail is sensitive to changes in upstream flow, making them difficult to operate. This problem shows the need for aerodynamic study of wingsails. A model of two-element wingsail is established and simulated by the steady and unsteady RANS approach with the k-! SST turbulence model and compared with the known experimental data to ensure the accuracy of the numerical simulation. Then, some key design and structural parameters (camber, the rotating axis position of the flap, angle of attack, flap thickness) are used to characterize the aerodynamic characteristics of the wingsail. The results show that the position of the rotating shaft of the flap has little influence on the lift coefficient at low camber. When stall occurs, the lift coefficient first increases and then decreases as the flap axis moves backward, which also delays the stall angle at a low camber.
    [Show full text]
  • 5TH HIGH PERFORMANCE YACHT DESIGN CONFERENCE 2015 Table of Contents
    5th High Performance Yacht Design Conference 2015 (HPYD 5) Auckland, New Zealand 10 – 12 March 2015 ISBN: 978-1-5108-1914-6 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2015) by High Performance Yacht Design Conference (HPYD) All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2016) For permission requests, please contact High Performance Yacht Design Conference (HPYD) at the address below. High Performance Yacht Design Conference (HPYD) c/o David Le Pelley University of Auckland, Mechanical Engineering Department Private Bag 92019 Auckland, New Zealand Phone: +64 9 527 5086 [email protected] Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2633 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com 5TH HIGH PERFORMANCE YACHT DESIGN CONFERENCE 2015 Table of Contents SESSION 1: WING SAILS - I Page 1. A CFD-based Wingsail Optimisation Method Coupled to a VPP Ignazio Maria Viola, Marco Biancolini, Matthieu Sacher, Ubaldo Cell 1 2. Aerodynamic Optimisation Study on a Rigid 2D Wing Sail in a Wind Tunnel Frederic Danbon, Dimitri Voisin & Michel Desjoyeaux 8 3. Aerodynamic Design Development of AC72 Wings Steve Collie, Burns Fallow, Nick Hutchins & Harold Youngren 15 SESSION 2: WING SAILS - II 4. Numerical Prediction of Stall on a Two-Elements Wingsail Vincent Chapin, Nicolas Gourdain, Nicolas Verdin, Alessandro Fiumara & Julien Senter 25 5. Evaluation of Multi-element Wing Sail Aerodynamics from Two-Dimensional Wind Tunnel Investigations Alex Blakely, Richard Flay, Hiroyuki Furukawa & Peter Richards 37 SESSION 3: AERODYNAMICS - I 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Numerical Method for the Design of Ships with Wind Assisted Propulsion
    Edinburgh Research Explorer A numerical method for the design of ships with wind-assisted propulsion Citation for published version: Viola, IM, Sacher, M, Xu, J & Wang, F 2015, 'A numerical method for the design of ships with wind-assisted propulsion', Ocean Engineering, vol. 105, pp. 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.009 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.009 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Ocean Engineering General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 Anumericalmethodforthedesignofshipswith wind-assisted propulsion a, b c c Ignazio Maria Viola ⇤,MatthieuSacher, Jinsong Xu ,FeiWang aInstitute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering, the University of Edinburgh bEcole Superieure des Techniques Aeronautique et de Construction Automobile cState Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Abstract The present paper presents a numerical investigation on the potential of wind-assisted propulsion for merchant ships. In particular, a KVLCC2M hull was equipped with a set of wingsails inspired from those used in the 34th America’s Cup.
    [Show full text]