DOCSLIB.ORG

Food Components in Fractions of Quinoa Seed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Food Components in Fractions of Quinoa Seed Food Sci. Technol. Res., 8 (1), 80–84, 2002 Food Components in Fractions of Quinoa Seed Hitomi ANDO,1 Yi-Chun CHEN,2 Hanjun TANG,2 Mayumi SHIMIZU,2 Katsumi WATANABE2* and Toshio MITSUNAGA2 1Kyoto Bunkyo Junior College, Kyoto 611-0041 Japan 2Department of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Kinki University, Nara 631-0052 Japan Received September 21, 2001; Accepted December 13, 2001 Whole quinoa grain was separated into bran and milled grain, and the milled grain into perisperm and embryo. The proximate composition of the milled grain was similar to that of whole grain. The protein and lipid content of the embryo was 57% of total protein and 49% of total lipid, respectively. Mineral analysis showed that the quinoa grain was rich in K, Mg, Ca, P and Fe. The perisperm contained large oval starch aggregates 20–30 ␮m in diameter and polygonal granules around 1 ␮m in diameter. Differential scanning calorimetry data indicated a gelatinization tem- perature of 54.0 to 71.0˚C and enthalpy of 11.0 J/g starch. The water-soluble protein and NaCl-soluble protein frac- tions composed 28.7–36.2% and 28.9–32.9% of total protein in each fraction. Unsaturated fatty acid accounted for 87.2–87.8% of total fatty acid. Phytate, a trypsin inhibitor activity and lipoxygenase activity in the embryo were high- est. The saponin content of the bran was 86% of total saponin. Keywords: quinoa seed, proximate composition, mineral, starch, protein, lipid, antinutrients Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) is a traditional food crop mercial suppliers. in several South American countries which has been attracting Chemical analysis Moisture, ash, protein and lipid con- attention because of the nutritional value of its protein (Ranhotra tents were determined by the AOAC method (Horwiz,1970). et al., 1993). Quinoa grain is a disc-shape, about 2 mm in diame- Dietary fiber was measured by the enzyme-weight method ter and 0.5 mm in thickness. The major anatomical parts of the (Prosky et al., 1988). Sugar content (%) was calculated by sub- grain are the pericarp, the perisperm and the embryo. The peri- tracting moisture, ash, protein, lipid and dietary fiber contents carp (bran) usually contains saponins, which are bitter antinutri- from 100%. Each mineral, with the exception of phosphorus, in tional compounds (Mastebroek et al., 2000). Therefore, milled the sample solutions prepared by the HCl-extract method (Yasui grain with the pericarp removed is used as food. The embryo of et al., 1985) was measured with an atomic absorption spectro- the milled grain wraps around the perisperm like a headband. photometer (HITACHI Z-6100). Phosphorus was determined The high nutritional value of quinoa grain is due mainly to its colorimetrically with ammonium molybdate and ammonium high content of good quality protein (Mahoney et al., 1975, vanadate (Yasui, 1996). Phytate phosphorus and total saponin Gross et al., 1989, Ranhotra et al., 1993). Studies of quinoa lipid were determined by the colorimetric method (Huang & Lantz- (Koziol, 1992), starch (Atwell et al., 1983, Lorenz, 1990), miner- sch, 1983) and the gravimetic method (Lalitha et al., 1987), al (Bruin, 1964) and antinutritional compounds (Chauhuhan et respectively. Trypsin inhibitor activity was assayed (Mitsunaga, al., 1992, Mastebroek et al., 2000) have been carried out. How- 1979) using ␣-N-benzoyl–D, L-arginine-p-nitroanilide as sub- ever, the food components of quinoa grain fractions have not strate. Lipoxygenase activity was measured by the conjugated been investigated. diene method (Takamura & Matoba, 1992). The objectives of this study were to characterize the distribu- Preparation and properties of starch granules Starch tion of food components in quinoa grain fractions and evaluate granules were prepared from the perisperm by a modified alkali the food value of this grain. method (Tang et al., 2000). The distribution of granule size was examined with a particle size analyzer (HORIBA Ltd, LA-700 Materials and Methods type). The shape and size of the granules was observed by scan- Materials Quinoa grain (Chenopodium quinoa Willd cul- ning electron microscopy (NIPPON DATAM, JSM-5400 LV). tivar Real TKW 2.8 g) grown in Bolivia in 1998 was used. X-ray diffraction was performed on the starch (10% moisture) Whole grain (Fig. 1A) was polished to separate the milled grain with an X-ray diffractometer (RIGAKU, Ltd, Rint-2000 type). (Fig.1B) and the bran (pericarp) with a rice milling machine Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed with a (SHIN-NAKANO KOGYO Ltd. MINI RICE POLISHING RP- starch to water ratio of 5 mg to 20 ␮l (RIGAKU Ltd., DSC- 5). The milled grain was then divided into the perisperm (Fig. 8240D). Iodine absorption spectra and ␤-amylolysis limit were 1C) and the embryo with this machine and sieves. Whole grain, measured following the methods of Takeda et al. (1983). milled grain, bran, perisperm and embryo were ground with a Determination of the amount of protein in each fraction mill for use as samples. All chemicals were purchased from com- Protein was extracted with H2O, 0.5 M NaCl, 60% n-propanol and 1% lactic acid solutions, successively, by the modified Maes method (Mitsunaga & Mitsuda, 1975). Insoluble protein was cal- *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] culated by subtracting soluble protein from total protein. Food Components in Quinoa Seed 81 Fig. 1. Scanning electron microscopy of quinoa grains and starches. A, whole grain; B, milled grain; C, perisperm; D, cross section of perisperm; E, starch aggregate; F, starch granule. Lipid analysis The lipid in the quinoa fraction was ex- with 10% methanolic HCl and subjected to gas-liquid chroma- tracted with chloroform/methanol/water according to the proce- tography (Shirasaka et al., 1998). dure of Bligh and Dyer (1959). The lipid was transmethylated 82 H. ANDO et al. Results and Discussion no difference among fractions. The proximate composition of Chemical components in each fraction During the milling quinoa grain fractions on the basis of dry weight is shown in of whole quinoa grains, the bran and embryo were separated Table 1. The protein, lipid, sugar, dietary fiber and ash content of from the perisperm portion, and 8.2% bran, 30.1% embryo and whole quinoa grain were 12.9, 6.5, 63.7, 13.9 and 3.0%, respec- 58.8% perisperm were obtained on a grain-weight basis with tively. The milling of the grain had little effect on the content of losses of 2.9%. each component. The protein, lipid, sugar, dietary fiber and ash The moisture content in each fraction was 10.0–11.9% with content of the embryo, however, were 23.5, 10.2, 43.1, 18.9 and 4.3%, respectively. The protein and lipid content were 57% of total protein and 49% of total lipid in whole grain, compared to 39% and 46% in the perisperm. The levels of protein (7.2%), lip- id (5.0%), dietary fiber (8.5%) and ash (1.1%) in the perisperm were considerably lower than in the corresponding whole grain. The sugar content of the perisperm was 78.2%, compared to 63.7% for whole grain. Table 3. Characterization of quinoa starch. Analysis Range X-ray diffraction pattern A-type Gelatinizationa) (˚C) To 54.0±0.6 Tp 62.2±0.3 Tc 71.0±0.7 Enthalpy(⌬H, J/g) 11.0±0.5 Iodine absorption spectrab) ␭max (nm) 602±2.1 Blue value 0.287±0.012 Apparent amylase contentc) (%) 23.9±1.0 ␤-Amylolysis limit (%) 59±1.5 All values are the mean±SD of three separate measuresments. a)To,Tp,and Tc are onset, peak and conclusion temperature, respectively. b)␭max=peak absorbance value over the range of wavelengths examined. Fig. 2. Distribution of particle size of quinoa starch granules. Y axis blue value(BV)=absorbance at 680 nm. shows volume % of starch particles. X axis shows particle size (␮m) with c)Apparent amylose content(%)=[BV(starch)/BV(amylase)]100, assuming logarithmic scale. the amylose BV to be 1.2 (Takeda et al., 1983). Table 1. Proximate composition of quinoa grain fractions. Whole grain Milled grain Bran Perisperm Embryo Proteina) 12.9±0.1 (100) 13.3±0.1 (96) 6.1±0.1 (4) 7.2±0.2 (39) 23.5±0.1 (57) Lipid 6.5±0.2 (100) 6.7±0.2 (95) 3.9±0.1 (5) 5.0±0.2 (46) 10.2±0.2 (49) Sugarb) 63.7 (100) 64.6 (93) 54.2 (7) 78.2 (73) 43.1 (20) Dietary fiber 13.9±0.2 (100) 12.7±0.2 (84) 26.6±0.2 (16) 8.5±0.3 (39) 18.9±0.1 (45) SDFc) 4.3±0.2 (100) 4.4±0.1 (96) 2.1±0.1 (4) 2.2±0.1 (35) 7.5±0.2 (61) IDFd) 9.6±0.3 (100) 8.3±0.2 (79) 24.5±0.2 (21) 6.3±0.2 (41) 11.4±0.1 (38) Ash 3.0±0.1 (100) 2.7±0.1 (76) 9.2±0.2 (24) 1.1±0.1 (25) 4.3±0.2 (51) All values are on a dry basis (%) and are the mean±SD of three separate measurements. The number in parentheses represents the proportion (%) of the content in each fraction against the total content in whole grain. a) N¥6.25. b)Calculated from the difference. c)SDF, soluble dietary fiber. d)IDF, insoluble dietary fiber. Table 2. Mineral content of quinoa grain fractions. Whole grain Milled grain Bran Perisperm Embryo K 825.7±12.3 (100) 639.3±9.4 (71) 2908.5±38.2 (29) 387.9±4.6 (28) 1125.4±18.3 (43) Mg 452.6±13.8 (100) 415.2±12.1 (83) 958.3±17.2 (17) 215.2±10.2 (29) 750.2±11.0 (54) Ca 121.3±5.2 (100) 91.8±3.8 (70) 481.3±11.1 (30) 71.8±2.4 (34) 139.7±7.2 (36) P 359.5±11.3 (100) 360.2±14.2 (92) 350.8±12.2 (8) 286.6±10.5 (50) 482.6±12.8 (42) Fe 9.5±0.2 (100) 9.2±0.1 (87) 14.3±0.2 (13) 7.2±0.1 (48) 11.3±0.3 (39) Mn 3.7±0.5 (100) 3.4±0.2 (81) 10.8±0.6 (19) 2.4±0.3 (38) 5.1±0.7 (43) Cu 0.7±0.1 (100) 0.6±0.1 (81) 1.4±0.2 (19) 0.5±0.1 (44) 0.8±0.1 (37) Zn 0.8±0.1 (100) 0.8±0.1 (91) 0.7±0.1 (9) 0.6±0.1 (48) 1.1±0.2 (43) Na 1.3±0.3 (100) 1.2±0.2 (79) 3.2±0.1 (21) 0.5±0.2 (31) 1.5±0.3 (48) All values (mg/mg%) are the mean±SD of three separate measurements.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Does Dietary Fiber Affect the Levels of Nutritional Components After Feed Formulation?
    fibers Article Does Dietary Fiber Affect the Levels of Nutritional Components after Feed Formulation? Seidu Adams 1 ID , Cornelius Tlotliso Sello 2, Gui-Xin Qin 1,3,4, Dongsheng Che 1,3,4,* and Rui Han 1,3,4 1 College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (G.-X.Q.); [email protected] (R.H.) 2 College of Animal Science and Technology, Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; [email protected] 3 Key Laboratory of Animal Production, Product Quality and Security, Jilin Agricultural University, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130118, China 4 Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-136-4431-9554 Received: 12 January 2018; Accepted: 25 April 2018; Published: 7 May 2018 Abstract: Studies on dietary fiber and nutrient bioavailability have gained an increasing interest in both human and animal nutrition. Questions are increasingly being asked regarding the faith of nutrient components such as proteins, minerals, vitamins, and lipids after feed formulation. The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence with the perspective of fiber usage in feed formulation. The consumption of dietary fiber may affect the absorption of nutrients in different ways. The physicochemical factors of dietary fiber, such as fermentation, bulking ability, binding ability, viscosity and gel formation, water-holding capacity and solubility affect nutrient absorption. The dietary fiber intake influences the different methods in which nutrients are absorbed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart Health Benefits of Dietary Fiber
    Conclusions. Heart disease continues to be one of the most factors for cardiovascular disease, including blood pressure, weight, widespread health problems in the United States. Fortunately, it is and glucose levels. Not all fibers provide the same cardiovascular ™ also among the most preventable health problems. To that end, benefits; however, and differences among the various types of fibers Expert Views Americans are encouraged to adopt heart-healthy habits, which should be appreciated when choosing a fiber supplement. Psyllium include a healthy diet and regular exercise.7 In addition to being an and oat fibers are the only fibers that have been recognized by the GI HealtH & Wellness | Issue four | february 2011 important part of a healthy diet, dietary fibers provide a number of FDA for their cholesterol-lowering and cardiovascular benefits, while cardiovascular benefits. The cholesterol-lowering benefits of certain other fibers such as calcium polycarbophil are indicated for their fibers (psyllium and oat fibers) as adjunct to a low-fat diet are well- laxation effects. An understanding of these differences should allow features: the heart health benefits of recognized and have been demonstrated in numerous well-controlled physicians and patients to tailor their choice of dietary fiber and fiber trials. Further, dietary fibers have beneficial effects on other key risk supplements to better meet their individual health goals. One dietary fiber CHD Prevalence february Is amerIcan Heart HealtH montH Cholesterol Lowering Benefits Heart
    [Show full text]
  • Pearling Barley and Rye to Produce Phytosterol-Rich Fractions Anna-Maija Lampia,*, Robert A
    Pearling Barley and Rye to Produce Phytosterol-Rich Fractions Anna-Maija Lampia,*, Robert A. Moreaub, Vieno Piironena, and Kevin B. Hicksb aDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Finland, and bUSDA, ARS, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, ABSTRACT: Because of the positive health effects of phyto- in the kernels and are more concentrated in the outer layers sterols, phytosterol-enriched foods and foods containing than in the starch-rich endosperm (6,7). During the milling of elevated levels of natural phytosterols are being developed. some grains, pearling is a traditional way of gradually remov- Phytosterol contents in cereals are moderate, whereas their lev- ing the hull, pericarp, and other outer layers of the kernels and els in the outer layers of the kernels are higher. The phytosterols germ as pearling fines to produce pearled grains. It is the most in cereals are currently underutilized; thus, there is a need to common technique used to fractionate barley (8). The abra- create or identify processing fractions that are enriched in sion of rye and barley to produce high-starch pearled grains phytosterols. In this study, pearling of hulless barley and rye was investigated as a potential process to make fractions with higher also has been used to improve fuel ethanol production (9,10). levels of phytosterols. The grains were pearled with a labora- There is a need to find new food uses for the pearling fines tory-scale pearler to produce pearling fines and pearled grains. and other possible low-starch by-products remaining after Lipids were extracted by accelerated solvent extraction, and separation of the high-starch pearled grain.
    [Show full text]
  • Mypyramid Food Groups
    Know how. Know now. Learn at Home: Nutrition Lessons for Healthy Living MyPyramid Food Groups By choosing to complete this mail lesson, you have taken the first step in learning more about the im- portance of nutrition and its relationship to good health. MyPyramid shows us what and how much we need to eat. It also shows us we need to be physically active. To complete this lesson: • Carefully read this lesson. It should take about 15-20 minutes to complete. • Answer the questions included with this lesson. • When you are finished, place the questions in the prepaid envelope and place the envelope in the mail. MyPyramid Food Groups – Orange is for the Grain group MyPyramid shows the impor- – Green is for the Vegetable group tance of making good food choices – Red is for the Fruit group from each of the five food groups every day. It also shows the impor- – Yellow is for Oils tance of being physically active most days of the week and making changes – Blue is for the Dairy group “one step at a time.” This mail lesson – Purple is for the Protein Foods group will discuss: • The MyPyramid symbol How Much Do You Need Every Day? • How much do you need every day? Calorie Level 2,000* • MyPyramid food groups Grain Group 6 ounces • Where do other foods fit? Vegetable Group 2 ½ cups MyPyramid Symbol Fruit Group 2 cups • The MyPyramid symbol shows six color bands Dairy Group 3 cups that run from the bottom of the pyramid to the Protein Foods Group 5 ½ ounces top.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Week Recommendations for Bodybuilders: an Evidence Based Approach Guillermo Escalante1, Scott W
    Escalante et al. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation (2021) 13:68 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-021-00296-y REVIEW Open Access Peak week recommendations for bodybuilders: an evidence based approach Guillermo Escalante1, Scott W. Stevenson2, Christopher Barakat3,4, Alan A. Aragon5 and Brad J. Schoenfeld6* Abstract Bodybuilding is a competitive endeavor where a combination of muscle size, symmetry, “conditioning” (low body fat levels), and stage presentation are judged. Success in bodybuilding requires that competitors achieve their peak physique during the day of competition. To this end, competitors have been reported to employ various peaking interventions during the final days leading to competition. Commonly reported peaking strategies include altering exercise and nutritional regimens, including manipulation of macronutrient, water, and electrolyte intake, as well as consumption of various dietary supplements. The primary goals for these interventions are to maximize muscle glycogen content, minimize subcutaneous water, and reduce the risk abdominal bloating to bring about a more aesthetically pleasing physique. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of evidence to support the commonly reported practices employed by bodybuilders during peak week. Hence, the purpose of this article is to critically review the current literature as to the scientific support for pre-contest peaking protocols most commonly employed by bodybuilders and provide evidence-based recommendations as safe and effective strategies on the topic. Keywords: Bodybuilding, Competition, Contest, Peaking Background muscle glycogen content as a means to enhance muscle Bodybuilding is a competitive endeavor where a combin- “fullness” (i.e. volume), (2) minimizing subcutaneous ation of muscle size, symmetry, “conditioning” (low body water (in an effort to look “dry” as opposed to “watery,” fat levels), and stage presentation are judged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Phytosterols Present in Natural Food Matrices on Cholesterol Metabolism and LDL-Cholesterol: a Controlled Feeding Trial
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2010) 64, 1481–1487 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0954-3007/10 www.nature.com/ejcn ORIGINAL ARTICLE The effects of phytosterols present in natural food matrices on cholesterol metabolism and LDL-cholesterol: a controlled feeding trial X Lin1, SB Racette2,1, M Lefevre3,5, CA Spearie4, M Most3,6,LMa1 and RE Ostlund Jr1 1Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipid Research, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; 2Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA; 3Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA and 4Center for Applied Research Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA Background/Objectives: Extrinsic phytosterols supplemented to the diet reduce intestinal cholesterol absorption and plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol. However, little is known about their effects on cholesterol metabolism when given in native, unpurified form and in amounts achievable in the diet. The objective of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that intrinsic phytosterols present in unmodified foods alter whole-body cholesterol metabolism. Subjects/Methods: In all, 20 out of 24 subjects completed a randomized, crossover feeding trial wherein all meals were provided by a metabolic kitchen. Each subject consumed two diets for 4 weeks each. The diets differed in phytosterol content (phytosterol-poor diet, 126 mg phytosterols/2000 kcal; phytosterol-abundant diet, 449 mg phytosterols/2000 kcal), but were otherwise matched for nutrient content. Cholesterol absorption and excretion were determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry after oral administration of stable isotopic tracers.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Products from Plant Foods Are Sources of Dietary Fibre and Antioxidants
    4 By-Products from Plant Foods are Sources of Dietary Fibre and Antioxidants Isabel Goñi and Deisy Hervert-Hernández Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain 1. Introduction Fruit and vegetables have been recognized as important sources for a wide array of non digestible components and phytochemicals that individually, or in combination, may act synergistically to contribute to the nutritional and health benefits of these food commodities. World Health Organization (WHO) and worldwide health authorities such as United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) promote a high consumption and variety of fruit and vegetables. In addition, the source of fibre in a healthy dietary pattern such as Mediterranean Diet has been described as an important qualitative difference on health. Fruit and vegetable related dietary fibre transports a significant amount of polyphenols and carotenoids linked to the fibre matrix through the human gut. Despite these effects and recommendations, the intake of plant foods remains low and, consequently, both dietary fibre and antioxidant compounds are usually deficient in most diets around the world. On the other hand, the food industry processing plant foods produces large amounts of waste and residues (leaves, stems, wastewaters, etc.) that are good sources of dietary fibre and phytochemicals. Several of them contain more dietary fibre than their respective edible portion. A variety of plant food byproducts are rich in fibre and polyphenolic compounds meeting the criteria of antioxidant dietary fibre. A broad spectrum of these will be summarized in the present work. In this chapter information on nutritional and phytochemical composition will be also included. Special attention nutritional claims criteria with reference to European Regulation has been given to quality ingredients for functional foods and/or dietary supplements.
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Fiber in Management of Diabetes
    Aaron I. Vinik, MD Dietary Fiber in David J.A. Jenkins, MD Management of Diabetes Current evidence suggests that high-fiber diets, elderly, or growing children, may require supplements especially of the soluble variety, and soluble fiber of calcium and trace minerals. People with upper supplements may offer some improvement in gastrointestinal dysfunction are at risk of bezoar carbohydrate metabolism, lower total cholesterol and formation and cautioned against a diet high in fiber of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and have the leafy vegetable type. Careful attention must be paid other beneficial effects in patients with non-insulin- to insulin dose because hypoglycemia can result if there dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Diets enriched is a radical change in fiber intake and insulin dose is not with wheat bran and guar gum induce 10-20% reduced appropriately. Care must be exercised in the reductions in serum cholesterol and LDL in both normo- use of "novel" fibers, including the wood celluloses, and hypercholesterolemic subjects and have the ability because little is known of their safety and efficacy. to blunt the hypertriglyceridemic effects of diets high in Diabetes Care 11:160-73,1988 carbohydrate and low in fiber. In insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) the situation is less clear, but a decrement of the circadian glucose profile has been shown. Americans, in general, consume too little fiber. With the need to restrict fat and reduce protein, an increase in carbohydrates is mandatory. A practical goal he diabetic diet has undergone considerable re- would be to establish the present level of fiber intake (15-30 g/day) and to gradually increase it.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Dietary Fibre and Diabetes Revisited
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2001) 55, 919–921 ß 2001 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0954–3007/01 $15.00 www.nature.com/ejcn Editorial Dietary fibre and diabetes revisited J Mann1 1Deparment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, New Zealand Dietary guidelines for people with diabetes appear to drate – high fibre diet was associated with a dramatic change from time to time and advice from various appar- improvement in glycaemic control and reduction in insulin ently authoritative sources differs — to the extent that those dose (Kiehm et al, 1976). In fact such observations were who have not carefully followed the reasoning behind the not entirely new, similar observations having been made recommendations might be forgiven for being somewhat many years earlier by Kempner using his rice diet (Kemp- dismissive regarding the extent to which dietary treatment ner et al, 1958). Inspired by the work of Anderson and also can influence glycaemic control and risk factor manage- by the studies of Stone and Connor (1963), who drew ment. The recently revised ‘Recommendations for the attention to the potential of the low carbohydrate – high fat nutritional management of patients with diabetes mellitus’ diet, then in widespread use, to increase cardiovascular prepared by the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group risk, our own group in Oxford, England embarked on a (DNSG) of the European Association for the Study of series of carefully controlled studies which helped to Diabetes (EASD) help to place in perspective apparent further understand the role of dietary fibre (Simpson discrepancies between advice emanating from groups of et al, 1979a; Simpson et al, 1979b; Simpson et al, 1981; researchers or expert committees (Diabetes and Nutrition Simpson et al, 1982; Lousley et al, 1984; Geekie et al, Study Group, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Are Phytochemicals Effective for CAD Prevention and Rehabilitation?
    Are Phytochemicals Effective for CAD Prevention and Rehabilitation? Joe Carlson, PhD, RD Associate Professor Director Div Sports & Cardiovascular Nutrition, Dept of Radiology; College of Osteopathic Medicine Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Are Phytochemicals Effective for CAD Prevention and Rehabilitation? I. Background – definitions; overview of evidence II. Phytochemical classification with food & beverage examples III. Summary of evidence phytochemical rich food & supplements IV. What is the best approach based on evidence to date? V. Summary-Applications and resource list. I. Background- What are Phytochemicals? Phyto = Plant; also called Phyto-nutrients A. Definitions: Many refer to non-nutrient plant food components with potential or known health benefits but do not have established intake recommendations like vitamins & minerals. • Biologically active but non-nutrient substances found in plants; includes antioxidants and phytosterols. Med Dictionary for the Health Profess & Nursing 2012 • The active chemical components, or constituents, present in a plant that account for its medicinal properties. Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition. © 2009, Elsevier. B. Are Phytochemicals Essential? Depends on definition -Most definitions do not classify as “nutrients” referring to essential vitamins & minerals that cause deficiency when not consumed. • FACT-selected phytochemicals are vitamin precursors or isomers; beta carotene- Vit A precursor, tocopherols & tocotrienols - Vit E isomers I. What is the best Approach for
    [Show full text]
  • Promote Optimal Health Antioxidant Benefits Anti-Inflammatory Benefits
    Promote Optimal Health The pigments that give beets their rich colors are called betalains. There are two basic types of betalains: betacyanins and betaxanthins. Betacyanins are pigments are red‐violet in color. Betanin is the best studied of the betacyanins. Betaxanthins are yellowish in color. In light or dark red, crimson, or purple colored beets, betacyanins are the dominant pigments. In yellow beets, betaxanthins predominate, and particularly the betaxanthin called vulgaxanthin. All betalains come from the same original molecule (betalamic acid). The addition of amino acids or amino acid derivatives to betalamic acid is what determines the specific type of pigment that gets produced. The betalain pigments in beets are water‐soluble, and as pigments they are somewhat unusual due to their nitrogen content. Many of the betalains function both as antioxidants and anti‐inflammatory molecules. At the same time, they themselves are also very vulnerable to oxidation (change in structure due to interaction with oxygen). In addition to beets, rhubarb, chard, amaranth, prickly pear cactus, and Nopal cactus are examples of foods that contain betalains. It’s interesting to note that humans appear to vary greatly in their response to dietary betalains. In the United States, only 10‐15% of adults are estimated to be “betalain responders.” A betalain responder is a person who has the capacity to absorb and metabolize enough betalains from beet (and other foods) to gain full antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and Phase 2 triggering benefits. (Phase 2 is the second step in our cellular detoxification process). Antioxidant Benefits What’s most striking about beets is not the fact that they are rich in antioxidants; what’s striking is the unusual mix of antioxidants that they contain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Declaration of Certain Isolated Or Synthetic Non-Digestible Carbohydrates As Dietary Fiber on Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels: Guidance for Industry
    Contains Nonbinding Recommendations The Declaration of Certain Isolated or Synthetic Non-Digestible Carbohydrates as Dietary Fiber on Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels: Guidance for Industry Additional copies are available from: Office of Nutrition and Food Labeling Nutrition Program Staff, HFS-830 Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive College Park, MD 20740 (Tel) 240-402-1450 https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number FDA-2018-D- 1323 listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition June 2018 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Background III. Discussion IV. References V. Appendix A – Intrinsic and Intact Non-Digestible Carbohydrates and Mixed Plant Cell Wall Fiber Ingredients 2 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations The Declaration of Certain Isolated or Synthetic Non-Digestible Carbohydrates as Dietary Fiber on Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels: Guidance for 1 Industry This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
    [Show full text]