DOCSLIB.ORG

Little Sharpshaw Solar Farm Proposal: Quick Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Little Sharpshaw Solar Farm Proposal: Quick Summary Little Sharpshaw Solar Farm Proposal: Quick Summary Developer AEE plan to build an industrial-scale solar farm of 22,000 black panels, stretching for over a mile of the A361 between the Marston Road area of Frome and Ridgeway. It will cover an area the size of Nunney with an industrial development, and it is one of several that are proposed within a few miles of Frome. Our objections are specific to this development. They are NOT objections to renewable energy in Mendip, which we see as an important part of our community's future. However, we believe that the proposal is far from industry good practice, and that planning permission should be refused for a number of reasons: 1. The proposal falls substantially below best practice, as demonstrated by other firms in the industry. 2. This is a poorly chosen site with a very high visibility impact on the surrounding landscape. 3. It is taking productive arable and grazing farmland out of agricultural use, in direct contravention of both National and District planning policy which prefers brownfield and low grade agricultural land. 4. It is industrialising a rural landscape with little attempt being made at fitting in to its environment (unlike many other solar farms). 5. The effect of noise, glint and glare on local residents and drivers on the A361. 6. The cumulative impact could be immense – it's one of a number of such developments either existing or proposed within a few miles of Frome. We are very much FOR renewable energy. Renewables currently enjoy broad support in the UK, but irresponsible and rushed applications, such as the one relating to Little Sharpshaw Farm, risk turning public opinion against the solar energy industry. Whatever your own opinion of renewable energy, we believe that we deserve to see at the very least good (even best) practice from the large scale solar industry in Somerset, minimising landscape impact, in well-chosen locations, not be fobbed off with poorly considered, high-impact, large scale developments; developments that are being rushed into planning in order to get them operational before subsidy rates change. What can you do? Write in objection to Mendip once the scheme goes in for planning. This will be in the next few days. For more information on how to object, and/or to register to be notified by email or text when the plans are available for objection, please visit our website www.stoplittlesharpshawsolar.co.uk, or phone 01373 836 476 and have a chat with Liam! Little Sharpshaw Solar Farm Proposal: More Detail Developer AEE plan to build a large-scale solar farm of 22,000 black panels, stretching for over a mile of the A361 between the Marston Road area of Frome and Ridgeway. It will cover an area the size of Nunney with an industrial development, and it is one of several that are proposed within a few miles of Frome. Our objections are specific to this development. They are not objections to renewable energy in Mendip, which we see as an important part of our community's future. 1. The proposal falls substantially below best practice It is possible for a large scale solar development to fit into its environment. Best practice on location is for sites to be chosen that are brownfield or low grade agricultural land unsuitable for arable production or regular grazing, sites that are largely invisible from the surrounding landscape thanks to pre- existing screening. Best practice on visual character is for substations and electrical switchgear to be housed buildings of agricultural Figure 1: visual character – good character clad in timber or local stone; for any hedging to be practice transformer housing as in 'instant hedging' style mature and semi mature native species Cornwall CC's planning guidance rather than hedging whips; for fencing to be highly note on large scale solar agricultural in character without industrial signage (such signage used instead on the panel units themselves). Best practice on environmental impact assessment is that any development of over 5 hectares of, e.g., greenhouses, should be subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment, even if not explicitly required. Best practice on environmental gain is for ongoing organic or near-organic management of species-rich meadow and/or regular grazing, hand-pulling of noxious weeds, bee friendly species established via plug plants where simple seeding fails, widely spaced panel rows allowing for hay cuts. Typical practice1 on community gain is for a section 106 agreement to provide a unilateral donation of £1,000 per megawatt per year – this would be £5,000 per year (inflation linked) for the twenty-five year lifetime of this project. This is a minimum standard figure. Figure 2: environmental gain – poor practice lack of meadow The Little Sharpshaw proposal fails to meet any of these good establishment or management after practices. 18 months at AEE Bradford on Avon, herbicides regularly used 1 Confirmed by Colm Murphy, Elgin Energy (a Solar Farm Development Firm operating out of Bristol and Dublin) as standard practice. 2. This is a poorly chosen site with a very high visibility impact on the surrounding countryside Figure 3: The proposed site; comparable in size to all of Nunney The proposed development site is on a ridge and will dominate the landscape. At their highest point the black panels will be 3.5m from ground level. From the A361, they will block over a mile of beautiful pastoral views across the valley to Whatley and Cranmore Tower. The panels will be clearly visible not just from driving along the A361 but also from large parts of residential Nunney, Ridgeway, Trudoxhill, The Marston Lane, Whitemill lane and Critchill areas of Frome, as well as being in the line of sight of several listed properties including nearby Marston House. The developers own 'Zone of Theoretical Visibility' map shows that the site will be visible from Chantry, Tytherington, Whatley, as well as from parts of Trudoxhill and Selwood parishes. Figure 4: The current view from the A361; fine, far reaching pastoral views across to Cranmore Tower and Whatley Church. Guidance from the Solar Industries own Trade Association as well as groups such as the Campaign to Protect Rural Engand (quoted) advises: “Appropriate sites would be flat with poor intervisibility with the surrounding landscape and with a pattern of large, simple geometric enclosures. Inappropriate sites would be sloping land highly visible from the surroundings”. The Mendip District Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework both require avoidance of highly visible sites. 3. It is taking productive farmland out of agricultural use The land under consideration for development is good, productive arable farm land that has been used for the growing of wheat, maize and silage, as well as for cattle grazing. This proposal will take this valuable land out of production for at least the next 25 years. Government National Policy is for industrial-scale solar “farms” to be sited on brownfield sites or on low value agricultural land (eg suited only for sheep grazing) – unlike the productive arable land at Little Sharpshaw Farm. The Mendip District Plan echoes this, as does Friends Of The Earth: “We would be concerned if solar farms were pushing out prime agricultural land but there's no real need for it to happen, there are enough roofs on houses, factories, local authority buildings and enough brown-field sites and waste land” and guidance produced by the Solar Farm’s own Solar Trade Association: “Solar farms are generally installed on brown field sites (e.g. disused airfields) or on areas that have been ranked under the Agricultural Land Classification as lower grade land.” 4. It is industrialising a rural landscape In addition to the erection of the 22,000 black solar panels, the site will include a number of transformers and one giant substation. These all resemble large metal shipping containers and each stands approx 3m (9') high. The whole site will then be surrounded by 3m high fencing. At AEE's Kingston Farm Figure 5: 'shipping container' style development near transformer housing at AEE's Bradford on Avon, this Bradford-on-Avon site is topped with barbed wire, and covered in bright yellow “danger of death” signs at regular intervals. 95% of the proposed Little Sharpshaw site boundary has no pre-existing visual screening. Any new hedge planting will take up to 15 years to provide any significant year-round Figure 6: broken scrub ground screening (and will still lack height and depth), and owing to dominated by dock and nettles, 3m the sloping nature of the site, can only ever hope to partially high fencing, industrial signage at screen the panels, transformers and substation. Twenty-five AEE's Bradford on Avon site years is a long time to suffer the industrial visual impact of this project. 5. The effect of noise, glint and glare on local residents and drivers The large metal substation that will channel the solar power into the grid is currently located in the most residential area of the entire 34 acre development – 150m from the houses on the Ridgeway. The substation will emit a low level but constant hum – audible to local residents especially at night when natural or man-made noise is at a minimum. Additionally, AEE have acknowledged that glint and glare will occur “in areas directly east and west of the solar park during sunset and sunrise during Spring and Summer.” The West end of the development is the residential area of Ridgeway. Marston roundabout sits at the far East of the development, with roads leaving off it to Frome, Shepton Mallet and to Westbury/Bath.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 67 Nunney Road, Frome, Somerset BA11 4LE £550,000
    67 Nunney Road, Frome, Somerset BA11 4LE £550,000 Description It has thriving arts and vibrant music communities. An opportunity to purchase a unique town property built Private schools are to be found in Wells, Bath, by the current family in 1960. The property was ahead of Warminster, Cranmore, Beckington, Glastonbury and its time at point of construction and remains both Street. Bath and Bristol are within commuting distance, individual and contemporary to this day. Interesting and the local railway station connects at Westbury for features include the kitchen with a polished concrete London, Paddington. The property is within easy walking work surface and a pi llar ed canopy running the width of distance of shops, cafés, and amenities. the property to the rear. There is an extensive garden to the front and a very large garden to the rear. This is a Services property that really is a once in a lifetime opportunity. 3 Mains drainage, water, electricity, BT are all connected. The Accommodation The property provides an entrance hallway with four Heating bedrooms set off (please note one bedroom is a walk- Gas fired central heating. through room - this might work well as a study or snug). There are two bathrooms, a WC and an open plan living/dining room. The kitchen has a polished concrete Council Tax Band work surface with matching pillars. The property remains Council Tax Band ‘C’. very much as it was built and may require sympathetic updating. T o one side is the garage which could, EPC Rating perhaps, be converted to provide extra living Rating ‘C’.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Land Study November 2012 on Behalf of Frome Town Council
    Employment Land Study November 2012 on behalf of Frome Town Council Prepared by PJK Chartered Surveyors and Mark Brunsdon Property Consultant CONTENTS PAGE 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Socio economic and demographic profile ...................................................................................... 3 4. Property Market .............................................................................................................................. 4 5. Consultations .................................................................................................................................. 7 6. Land Need Forecasts ..................................................................................................................... 13 7. Employment Land ......................................................................................................................... 24 8. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 34 Appendices 1. Sources of Information 2. List of Figures 3. Consultees 4. Community Infrastructure Levy 5. Flood Risk map 6. Interim Employment Land Policy 7. SWOT analyses for existing 25 employment sites 8. Frome office Supply (availability – Nov
    [Show full text]
  • SOMERSETSHIRE. [KELLY's in the Gift of Lord Hylton, and Held Since X864 by the Rev
    292 KILMERSDON. SOMERSETSHIRE. [KELLY'S in the gift of Lord Hylton, and held since x864 by the Rev. CouNTY MAGISTRATES FOR KILMERSDON PETTY SESSIONAL. Henry George John Veitch B.A. of Balliol College, Oxford. DIVISION. Part of this parish was formed into the ecclesiastical parish Hylton Lord D.L. Ammerdown park, Bath, chairman of Coleford, April4, 1843. Here are Wesleyan and Primi­ de Blaquiere Lord, Woodborough house, near Bath tive Methodist chapels. In I875, to the north-west of the Jolliffe Hon. Hylton George Hylton M.P. Ammerdown parkr church, and close to the boundary of the parish, a shaft was Bath sunk for coal, and is worked by the Kilmersdon Colliery Batey John esq. St. Edmunds house, Vobster, Mells, Frome.. Company Limited. Ammerdown, the seat of the Right Bird Frederick esq. Norton house, Midsomer Norton, Bath Hon. Lord Hylton D.L., l.P. within a park 4 miles in Brodertp Edmund Greenhill esq. Cossington Manor house~ circumference, surrounded by a wall 8 feet in height, is a Bridgwater modern building in the Italian style, from a design by the Butler Samuel Evan esq.M.A.Caisson house,Combe Hay,Batb. late James Wyatt, and commands extensive views of the Daubeney Wm. Arthur esq. M.A. The Clevelands, Dawlish surrounding country; in the park, on a site Boo feet above Dickinson Robert Edmund esq. Coombe cottage, Lyncombe. the sea level, stands a column, I5o feet high, rising from a hill, Bath platform relieved wit'tl casts from antique statues and con­ Horner John Francis Fortescue esq. M.A., D.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakleaze, Brickyard Lane, Wanstrow BA4 4TH £595,000
    Oakleaze, Brickyard Lane, Wanstrow BA4 4TH £595,000 Accommodation There is a wide range of excellent schools in the area both Oakleaze is a spacious detached three bedroom bungalow with public and private sectors including Downside at Stratton on the two bedroom completely self-contained annexe, ideal for Fosse, Millfield at Street, Wells Cathedral School, Sunny Hill rental/relative, situated in a generous plot – around 1.4 acres in (Bruton School for Girls) and Kings School at Bruton. The main total, including an orchard and a haha, in a very rural location line railway station is at Castle Cary (London/Paddington 90 not far from the Somerset village of Wanstrow. mins) and from Gillingham, which connects to Waterloo. Agents Note The accommodation comprises of the main house which provides three bedrooms, a sitting room, dining room, a well- Oakleaze provides an opportun ity for a purchaser to have a lovely family home, with the extra accommodation of an annexe, appointed kitchen/breakfast room, a bathroom and a utility room. with room for horses or livestock and ample room for other The annexe provides a sitting room with a feature fireplace, a hobbies, or indeed to work from home. Viewing is highly fully fitted kitchen/dining room and on the first floor two recommended. bedrooms and a bathroom. The layout of the property is ideal for Tenure a family looking for room for a dependant relative or teenage flat Freehold There is also the scope to work from home if required. An extremely versatile property offering many possibilities. Council Tax Band Band ‘E’ Outside EPC Rating The property sits in the centre of the garden and grounds and Rating E.
    [Show full text]
  • Selwood Garden Village Development Vision and Prospectus DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
    Selwood Garden Village Development Vision and Prospectus DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT Produced by NVB Architects Document ref 1731 1800A Date 08/02/2018 Purpose MDC Part 2 Reps 2 NVB Architects CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7.0 URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPLES 1.1 Purpose of Report 4 7.1 Engagement and local input 18 1.2 Executive Summary 4 7.2 Walkable neighbourhoods 18 7.3 Distinctive neighbourhoods 18 2.0 PROPOSED SITE 7.5 Permeable Neighbourhoods 19 2.1 Options for Frome Expansion 5 7.6 Local centre 19 2.2 Location and boundaries 6 7.7 Green Space and Sports Provision 20 2.3 Existing uses Inside the site 7 7.8 Legacy and maintenance 20 2.4 Existing uses Outside the site 7 8.0 MASTERPLAN SUMMARY 3.0 CONSULTATION 8.1 Summary 21 3.1 Meeting with the Community 8 8.2 Conclusions 21 3.2 Key Messages from Stakeholders 8 4.0 CONTEXT 4.1 Landscape 9 4.2 Connectivity 9 4.3 Heritage 10 4.4 Ecology 10 5.0 VISION 5.1 Mendip District Council 11 5.2 Frome Town Council Vision 12 5.3 Development Vision 13 5.4 The Garden Village 13 6.0 THE PROPOSALS 6.1 Proposal Summary 14 6.2 Landscape Framework 14 6.3 Movement Networks 15 6.4 Use and Character 16 6.5 Phasing 17 6.7 Energy Resources 17 Selwood Garden Village 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Report 1.2 Executive Summary NVB Architects and Grassroots Planning have responded We are in the midst of a housing crisis, and there is to the recently issued Local Plan Part 2 site allocation broad cross party political support for providing new plan and have put forward an alternative development strategy for Selwood Garden Village which is located to next generation of home buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • New Slinky Mendip East L/Let.Indd 1 20/01/2017 14:41 Monday Pickup Area Tuesday Pickup Area Wednesday Pickup Area
    What is the Slinky? How much does it cost? Slinky is an accessible bus service funded Please phone the booking office to check Mendip East Slinky by Somerset County Council for people the cost for your journey. English National unable to access conventional transport. Concessionary Travel Scheme passes can be Your local transport service used on Slinky services. You will need to show This service can be used for a variety of your pass every time you travel. Somerset reasons such as getting to local health Student County Tickets are also valid on appointments or exercise classes, visiting Slinky services. friends and relatives, going shopping or for social reasons. You can also use the Slinky Somerset County Council’s Slinky Service is as a link to other forms of public transport. operated by: Mendip Community Transport, MCT House, Who can use the Slinky? Unit 10a, Quarry Way Business Park, You will be eligible to use the Slinky bus Waterlip, Shepton Mallet, Somerset BA4 4RN if you: [email protected] • Do not have your own transport www.mendipcommunitytransport.co.uk • Do not have access to a public bus service • Or have a disability which means you Services available: cannot access a public bus Monday to Friday excluding Public Holidays Parents with young children, teenagers, students, the elderly, the retired and people Booking number: with disabilities could all be eligible to use the Slinky bus service. 01749 880482 Booking lines are open: How does it work? Monday to Friday 9.30am to 4pm If you are eligible to use the service you will For more information on Community first need to register to become a member of Transport in your area, the scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • 01278 783842 Westonzoyland School Cheer Lane, Westonzoyland
    Somerset County Council First Admissions 2015 Schools with Spare Places This is a list of schools which currently have one or more spare places. If you wish to be considered for a place at one of these schools, please contact Somerset Direct on 0300 123 2224 to request an application form. Sedgemoor First Schools Axbridge Church of England First School Academy Moorland Street, Axbridge, BS26 2BA 01934 732391 Draycott and Rodney Stoke CofE First School School Lane, Draycott, Cheddar, Somerset, BS27 3SD 01934 742052 East Brent CofE First School Church Road, East Brent, Highbridge, Somerset, TA9 4HZ 01278 760490 Lympsham CofE VC First School Rectory Way, Lympsham, Weston-Super-Mare, Somerset, BS24 0EW 01934 750473 Shipham CofE First School Turnpike Road, Shipham, Winscombe, Somerset, BS25 1TX 01934 843485 Weare Academy First School Weare, Axbridge, Somerset, BS26 2JS 01934 732270 Wedmore First School Academy Blackford Road, Wedmore, Somerset, BS28 4BS 01934 712643 Sedgemoor Primary Schools Cannington CofE Primary School Brook Street, Cannington, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA5 2HP 01278 652368 Nether Stowey CofE Primary School Mill Close, Nether Stowey, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA5 1NX 01278 732508 Pawlett Primary School Gaunts Road, Pawlett, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA6 4SB 01278 684151 Spaxton CofE School High Street, Spaxton, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA5 1BS 01278 671409 Stogursey CofE Primary School Tower Hill, Stogursey, Bridgwater, Somerset, TA5 1PR 01278 732389 West Huntspill Community Primary School New Road, West Huntspill, Highbridge, Somerset,
    [Show full text]
  • Leighonmendip PARISH PLAN 2006 2 History to Present
    2.0 HISTORICAL VILLAGE TO THE CURRENT DAY 2.1 History The Parish of Leigh on Mendip lies on the north facing slopes of the Mendip Hills approximately half way between the market towns of Frome and Shepton Mallet. The actual village of Leigh on Mendip is a linear settlement running east to west on a plateau of carboniferous limestone called the Mendip Plateau. There is evidence of human activity dating back to pre-Roman times. Prior to the expansion of Halecombe quarry, there were signs of flint working in the area but, with the obliteration of the evidence, it is not known whether the material being worked was a small, localised, igneous intrusion (as at Moonshill quarry, Stoke St. Michael) or material imported to the site. Pottery shards have also been discovered in the area. 1 First mention of the area of land we now know as Leigh on Mendip is in a record from Glastonbury Abbey dated 681 AD chronicling the gift of land by Hedda, Bishop of Winchester to the Abbey. The parish is referred to as Luntocae – in fact a very Roman sounding name – and probably the source of the pronunciation of the name “Leigh” to this day. As far as documentary evidence is concerned using the modern name, the earliest document to mention Leigh on Mendip is a charter by King Edmund dated 942 AD granting land to Glastonbury Abbey. The Parish of Leigh on Mendip was part of that land and remained so until the dissolution of the monasteries in the 1530’s. At that time, Glastonbury Abbey was the most powerful and wealthy religious institution in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Consultees and Agencies
    Mendip Local Plan Part II Index to Issues and Options Responses Statutory Consultees/Agencies Full Response Company / Organisation Village/Town Question Site Reference Reference Reference IOPT2-315.1-823 Bath and North East Midsomer Norton MQ2 Somerset Council and Radstock IOPT2-492-1-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 IOPT2-492-2-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 IOPT2-492-3-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 GLAS114E IOPT2-492-4-4001 Environment Agency Wells WELLSQ3 WELLS010 IOPT2-492-5-4001 Environment Agency Wells WELLSQ3 WELLS118 IOPT2-492-6-4001 Environment Agency Wells WOOKQ3 WOOK002 IOPT2-492-7-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 SA04 IOPT2-492-8-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 SA06 IOPT2-492-9-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 IOPT2-492-10-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 IOPT2-492-11-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 IOPT2-492-12-4001 Environment Agency Mendip MQ1 SA05 IOPT2-273.1-1798 Historic England SA Scoping Report IOPT2-273.2-1798 Historic England Wells WELLSQ2 WELLS004 IOPT2-273.3-1798 Historic England Frome FROQ2 FRO152 IOPT2-273.4-1798 Historic England Frome FROQ2 FRO004 IOPT2-273.5-1798 Historic England Street STRQ2 STR003 IOPT2-273.6-1798 Historic England Shepton Mallet SHEPQ2 SHEP014 IOPT2-273.7-1798 Historic England Shepton Mallet SHEPQ2 SHEP0111 IOPT2-273.8-1798 Historic England Walton WALQ3 WAL002 IOPT2-273.9-1798 Historic England Walton WALQ3 WAL003 IOPT2-273.10-1798 Historic England Coxley COXQ3 COX019 IOPT2-273.11-1798 Historic England Coxley COXQ3 COX002 IOPT2-273.12-1798 Historic England Coxley COXQ3
    [Show full text]
  • Horn Street & Westdown Farm Lane, Nunney & Wanstrow
    (Notice2) SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICT OF MENDIP MENDIP PARISH OF NUNNEY WANSTROW Temporary Closure of Horn Street and Westdown Farm Lane TAKE NOTICE that in pursuance of Section 14(1) of the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984, as amended by the Road Traffic (Temporary Restrictions) Act 1991, the County Council of Somerset have made an Order PROHIBITING ALL TRAFFIC from proceeding along Horn Street and Westdown Farm Lane from both junctions with A361 Haygrove Lane to Holwell Hill to 40 metres north east of the junction with Westdown Farm Lane to Castle Hill a distance of 1435 metres. This order will enable Somerset Highways to carry out resurfacing works in this road. The Order becomes effective on 14 May 2014 and will remain in force for eighteen months. The works are expected to last for 5 nights exlcluding the weekend between 19:00 and 07:00 hours. While the closure is in operation an alternative route will be signed as detailed below. ALTERNATIVE ROUTE From the southern end of the closure proceed in south westerly and north westerly directions along the A361 to the junction with Ball Lane to Piers Road. Turn right and proceed in a north westerly direction along Ball Lane to Piers Road and Ball Lane to Long Cross to the junction with Old Wells Road. Turn right and proceed in a north easterly direction along Old Wells Road and Railford Hill to the junction with Nunney Road. Turn right and proceed in a south westerly direction along Nunney Road and Westdown Farm Lane to the northern end of the closure, and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decision
    Appeal Decision Inquiry held on 20 - 22 January 2015 Site visit made on 19 January 2015 by R Schofield BA(Hons) MA MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 24 February 2015 Appeal Ref: APP/Q3305/A/14/2224843 Land at Green Pits Lane, Nunney, Somerset BA11 • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant outline planning permission. • The appeal is made by BDW Trading Limited against the decision of Mendip District Council. • The application Ref 2014/0198/OTS, dated 7 February 2014, was refused by notice dated 27 August 2014. • The development proposed is outline planning permission for the erection of up to 100 no. dwellings, vehicular access from Glebelands, highways improvements, public open space, drainage and associated works. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Preliminary Matters 2. The application was made in outline with all matters reserved, other than access, for later consideration. In advance of the determination of the application, revised plans were submitted that changed the location of the vehicular access point, moving it to Green Pits Lane, along with changes to the pedestrian access. These were available for public consideration. Thus, notwithstanding the description of development in the header above, which is taken from the application form, I have considered the appeal on the basis of the revised plans. 3. Since the Council issued its decision notice, it adopted the Mendip Local Plan Part 1 (the Part 1 Plan) in December 2014. Following the close of the Inquiry I was made aware of a High Court challenge, albeit not made by the appellant, over the Council’s decision to adopt the Part 1 Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Mineralogical Report on Ceramics
    Appendix A Mineralogical report on ceramics Jens Andersen, David Dawson and Gavyn Rollinson Mineralogical analysis was carried out by QEMS- ance of inclusions is very variable, and in some CAN using the methodology described by cases for the post-medieval less than one volume Andersen et al. (in press). Four major mineralo- percent. It is particularly worrying that sherds gical types were recognised and the key miner- that are visually very similar have signific- alogical characteristics of these types are listed antly different inclusion populations and matrix in Table A.1 on the next page. A list of poten- compositions. This demonstrates, perhaps, how tial minerals included in the QEMSCAN mineral difficult it is to establish the provenance of pottery groups is given in Table A.2 on page 291. fabric types based on their inclusion mineralogy using optical microscopy. Generally (for types A, B, and C) the inclusion populations can be Results of the Mineralogical Analysis described as simple mixtures of two minerals, and it is likely that they have been derived from The most obvious result of the mineralogical distinct sources that are relatively mineralogic- analysis is that the sherds from production sites ally pure. While some accidental inclusions are display consistent mineralogical groupings that likely, the uniform mineralogy of the inclusions appear to relate to differences in the local bedrock between different types makes it more likely that geology. Although the present dataset does not the pottery was intentionally engineered from adequately account for variability within and components that had been deliberately sourced as between sites, these geological correlations to appropriate materials for tempering of different some extent corroborate the existing archaeolog- wares.
    [Show full text]