International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110 International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110 ISSN 1306-3065 ©International 2007 by IJESE . All Rights Reserved

Learning Environment: A Bibliography

1* Sacit KOSE 1Huseyin BAG, 1Kutret GEZER 1 Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Department of Science Teacher Education, Denizli, TURKEY * Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract: In this study, the Learning Environment Research-Bibliography includes studies on Educational subject. We have analyzed many journals, books, and theses published in international. The references listed here primarily focus on the empirical research related to the learning environmental research e as an educational goal; along with a few learning environment works by such authors as Fraser, Doppelt, Dorman, Johnson, Roth, Goh, Fisher, and others. While not exhaustive, the list should prove useful to educators, and scholars in other fields, interested in the Learning environment and how its understanding can be realized as a goal of education. The authors welcome correspondence regarding omissions from the list, and on-going additions that can be made to it.

Key words: Learning Environment Research-Bibliography

Journal Article and Conference Paper motivation of students at risk” Learning Environments Research 7: 1–22, 1. Aalst J. V. & Hill C. M. 2006 “Activity theory 8. Allodi, M. W. 2002 “A two-level analysis of as a framework for analysing knowledge classroom climate in relation to social context, building” Learning Environments Research 9: group composition and organization of special 23–44 support” Learning Environments Research 5: 2. Admiraal, W. F., Lockhorst, D., Wubbels, T., 253–274 Korthagen F. A.J. & Veen, W. 1998 9. Alonso-Tapia J. &Pardo A. 2006 “Assessment “Computer-mediated communication of learning environment motivational quality environments inteacher education: computer from the point of view of secondary and high conferencing and the supervision of student school learners” Learning and Instruction, 4; teachers” Learning Environments Research 1: 295-309 59–74 10. Anderson, A., Richard, J. H. & John, H. 2004 3. Aharony, N. 2006 “The use of deep and “Classroom climate and motivated behaviour surface learning strategies among students in secondary schools” Learning Environments learning english as a foreign language in an Research 7 211-225 internet environment” British Journal of 11. Anderson, D. 2005 “Leigh a portrait of a Educational Psychology 76 851-866 feminist mathematics classroom: what 4. Akar, H.; Yıldırım, A. 2004 “Learners' adolescent girls say about mathematics, metaphorical images about classroom themselves, and their experiences in a "unique" management in a social constructivist learning learning environment” Feminist Teacher: A environment” No. of Pages: 29 Online Journal of the Practices, Theories, and Submission; Paper presented at the Annual Scholarship of Feminist Teaching 3;175-194 Meeting of the American Educational Research 12. Bain, J. D., Mcnaught, C., Mills C. & Association (AERA) (San Diego, CA,) Lueckenhausen, G. 1998. “Describing 5. Aldridge J. M., Laugksch R. C. & Fraser B. J. computer-facilitated learning environments in 2006 “School-level environment and higher education” Learning Environments outcomes-based education in South Africa” Research 1: 163–180,. Learning Environments Research 9:123–147 13. Barak, M., Waks, S. & Doppelt, Y. 2000 6. Aldridge, J. M. & Fraser, B. J. 2000 “A cross- “Majoring in technology studies at high school cultural study of classroom learning and fostering learning” Learning Environments environments in australia and taiwan” Learning Research 3: 135–158,. Environments Research 3: 101–134,. 14. Beffa-Negrini P. A., Cohen N. L. & Miller B. 7. Alfassi, M. 2004 “Effects of a learner-centred 2002 “Strategies to motivate students in online environment on the academic competence and learning environments” Journal of Nutrition

98 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

Education and Behavior, Volume 34, Issue Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 4 269- 6, November-December, Pages334-340 280 15. Bong, M. 2005 “Within-grade changes in 27. Chuang S.& Tsai C. 2005 “Preferences toward korean girls' motivation and perceptions of the the constructivist ınternet-based learning learning environment across domains and environments among high school students in achievement levels” Journal of Educational taiwan” Computers in Human Psychology 4; 656-672 Behavior, Volume21,Issue2, March, Pages255- 16. Bosman A. M.T., Huygevoort M.& Verhoeven 272 L. 2007 “Spelling feedback in an ıct-learning 28. Claudet, J. G. 1999 “Conceptualizing environment: ıssues of proficiency, training organizational dimensions of ınstructional efficiency, and transfer” International Journal supervisory practice: implications for of Educational Research, In Press, Corrected professional learning environments in schools” Proof, Available online 2 March, Learning Environments Research 1: 257–292,. 17. Boykin, A. W., Lilja, A. J. & Tyler, K. M. 2004 29. Cope, C.; Staehr, L. 2005 “İmproving Students' “The influence of communal vs. individual Learning Approaches through Intervention in learning context on the academic performance an Information Systems Learning in social studies of grade 4–5 African- Environment” Studies in Higher Education 30 Americans” Learning Environments Research 181-197 7 227-244 30. Creemers, B. P.M. & Reezigt, G. J. 1999 “The 18. Brok P.; Brekelmans M. & Wubbels T. concept of vision in educational effectiveness “Multilevel issues in research using students’ theory & research” Learning Environments perceptions of learning environments: the case Research 2: 107–135 of the questionnaire on teacher interaction” 31. Crump Barbara J. & Rennie LÉonie J. 2004 Learning Environments Research (2006) “The tertiary programming learning 9:199–213 environment: is it equitable?” Learning 19. Buck, G. A. 2002 “Teaching discourses: Environments Research 7 295-313 science teachers’ responses to the voices of 32. Darrell L. F. & Fraser B. J. 2003 “Emergence adolescent girls” Learning Environments of learning environment research in south Research 5: 29–50,. africa: editors’ introduction” Learning 20. Buerck J. P., Theodore Malmstrom & Elliott Environments Research 6: 229–230,. Peppers 2003 “Learning environments & 33. Dart, B., Burnett, P., Boulton-Lewis, G., learning styles: nontraditional student Campbell, J., Smith D. & Mccrindle A. 1999 enrollment & success in an internet-based “Classroom learning environments and versus a lecture-based computer science students’ approaches to learning” Learning course” Learning Environments Research 6: Environments Research 2: 137–156,. 137–155,. 34. Dellar, G, B. 1999 “School climate, school 21. Cavanagh R. F. , Romanoski J. T. 2006 “Rating improvement and site-based management” scale instruments and measurement” Learning Learning Environments Research 1: 353–367,. Environments Research 9:273–289 35. Dewiyanti S., Brand-Gruwel S., Jochems W.& 22. Cavanagh, Robert F. & Waugh Russell F. 2004 Broers N. J. 2007 Students’ experiences with “Secondary school renewal: the effect of collaborative learning in asynchronous classroom learning culture on educational Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning outcomes” Learning Environments Research environments Computers in Human 7 245-269 Behavior, Volume 23, Issue 1, January, Pages 23. Cheung, W. S.; Hew, K. F. 2004 “Evaluating 496-514 the extent of ill-structured problem solving 36. Dhindsa, H. S. & Fraser, B. J. 2004 “Culturally- process among pre-service teachers in an sensitive factors in teacher trainees’ learning asynchronous online discussion and reflection environments” Learning Environments log learning environment" Journal of Research 7: 165–181,. Educational Computing Research 30 197-227 37. Dhindsa, H.S. 2005 “Cultural learning 24. Ching M. M. & Marcellin F. 2002 environment of upper secondary science “Determinants of students’ quality of school students. research report” International Journal life:a path model” Learning Environments of Science Education 5; 575-592 Research 5: 275–300,. 38. Dochy F., Mien S., Bossche P.& Katrien S. 25. Chou, S.; Liu, C. 2005 Learning Effectiveness 2005 “students’ perceptions of a problem- in a Web-Based Virtual Learning Environment: based learning environment” Learning A Learner Control Perspective Journal of Environments Research 8: 41–66 Computer Assisted Learning 1; 65-76 39. Doppelt, Y. 2006 “Teachers’ and pupils’ 26. Chou, S.W. 2005 “Designing Good perceptions of science–technology learning İnstitutional Contexts for İnnovation in a environments” Learning Environments Technology-Mediated Learning Environment” Research 9:163–178

99 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

40. Doppelt, Y. 2004 “Impact of science- 52. Fraser, B. J. 1998 “The launch of a new technology learning environment journal: editor’s introduction” Learning characteristics on learning outcomes: pupils’ Environments Research 1: 137–138,. perceptions and gender differences” Learning 53. Fraser, B. J. 2003 “Learning environments Environments Research 7 271-293 research in asia: editor’s introduction” Learning 41. Dorman, J,P. 1999 “The development and Environments Research 6: 1–3,. validation of an Instrument to assess 54. Fraser,B.J. 1998 “Classroom environment institutional-level environment in universities” instruments: development,validity and Learning Environments Research 1: 333–352,. applications” Learning Environments Research 42. Dorman, J. P. 2001 “Associations between 1: 7–33,. classroom environment and academic efficacy” 55. Freiberg, H. J. Book Review “School Climate: Learning Environments Research 4: 243–257,. Measuring, İmproving & Sustaining Healthy 43. Dorman, J. P. 2003 “Cross-national validation Learning Environments. (Ed.). London: of the what is happening in this class? (wihic) Falmer Press. 1999, 230 Pp. İsbn 0 7507 0641 questionnaire using confirmatory factor 4, İsbn 0 7507 0642 2 (Paperback). Learning analysiskevin marjoribanks” Learning Environments Research 2: 331–334, 2000. Environments Research 6: 231–245,. 56. Gerjets P. H. & Hesse F. W. 2004 “When are 44. Drennon, C. 2005 “Teaching geographic powerful learning environments effective? The information systems in a problem-based role of learner activities and of students’ learning environment” Journal of Geography conceptions of educational technology” in Higher Education 3;385-402 International Journal of Educational 45. Elen, J. & Clarebout, G. 2001 “An invasion in Research, Volume 41, Issue 6, , Pages 445-465 the classroom: influence of an ill-structured 57. Gibson, İ.W. 2005 “constructing meaning in a innovation on instructional and technology-rich, global learning epistemological beliefs” Learning environment” Computers in the Schools 22 Environments Research 4: 87–105,. 169-182 46. Entwistle N. J. & Peterson E. R. 2004 58. Gijbels, D.; van de Watering, G.; Dochy, F. “Conceptions of learning and knowledge in 2005 “Integrating assessment tasks in a higher education: relationships with study problem-based learning environment” behaviour and influences of learning Assessment and Evaluation in Higher environments” Education 1 ;73-86 International Journal of Educational 59. Goh S. C. & Khine M. S. Book Review Research, Volume 41, Issue 6, , Pages 407-428 “Studies in Educational Learning Fish, M. C. & Dane E. “The classroom Environments: An İnternational Perspective. systems observation scale: development of an (Eds.). Singapore:World Scientific Publishing. instrument to assess classrooms using a 2002, 241 Pp. İsbn 981-238-145-7, İsbn 981- systems perspective” Learning Environments 238-056-6 (Paperback)” Learning Research 3: 67–92, 2000 Environments Research (2005) 8: 95-100 47. Fisher, D. & Cresswell J. 1998 “Actual and 60. Goh, S. C. & Fraser, B. J. 1998. “Teacher ideal principal interpersonal behaviour” interpersonal behaviour, classroom Learning Environments Research 1: 231–247,. environment and student outcomes in primary 48. Foster M. A., Lambert R., Abbott-Shim M., mathematics in singapore” Learning McCarty F.& Franze S. 2005 “A model of Environments Research 1: 199–229, home learning environment and social risk 61. Goh, S. C. & Tobin, K. 1999 “Student and factors in relation to children's emergent teacher perspectives in computermediated literacy and social outcomes” Early Childhood learning environments in teacher education” Research Quarterly, Volume 20, Issue 1, 1st Learning Environments Research 2: 169–190 Quarter, Pages 13-36 62. Gräsel, C., Fischer, F. & Mandl, H. 2001 “The 49. Foster, M.A.; Lambert, R.; Abbott-Shim, M., use of additional information in 2005 “A model of home learning environment problemoriented learning environments” and social risk factors in relation to children's Learning Environments Research 3: 287–305,. emergent literacy and social outcomes” Early 63. Grover, S. 2005 “The views of youth on their Childhood Research Quarterly: 1 ;13-36 educational rights:a case study of secondary 50. Fraser B.J. & Walberg H. J. 2005 “Research on students from twonorthern ontario high teacher–student relationships and learning schools” Learning Environments Research 8: environments: Context, retrospect and 177–193 prospect” International Journal of Educational 64. Hakkarainen, K. 2003 “Emergence of Research, Volume 43, Issues 1-2, , Pages 103- progressive-inquiry culture in computer 109 supported collaborative learning” Learning 51. Fraser, B. J. 1998 “The birth of a new journal: Environments Research 6: 199–220,. editor’s introduction” Learning Environments 65. Harwell, S. H., Gunter, S., Montgomery, S., Research 1: 1–5,. Cheryl S. & Deborah W. 2001 “Technology

100 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

integration & the classroom learning 80. Johnson, C, E. & Templeton R, A, 1999 environment: research for action” Learning “Promoting peace in a place called school” Environments Research 4: 259–286 Learning Environments Research 2: 65–77, 66. Hayes, M. T. 2002 “A case study of elementary 81. Johnson, L. M. 2006 “Elementary school science teaching as mediated action: students' learning preferences and the transformations of context, meaning and classroom learning environment: implications action” Learning Environments Research 5: for educational practice and policy” Journal of 167–183,. Negro Education 506-518 67. Hirata, S, & Sako, T. 1999 “Perceptions of 82. Joiner K. F, Malone J. A. & Haimes, D. H. school environment among japanese junior 2002 “Assessment of classroom environments high school, non-attendant, and juvenile in reformed calculus education” Learning delinquent students” Learning Environments Environments Research 5: 51–76,. Research 1: 321–331,. 83. Jong, R.& Klaas J. W. 2001 “The quality of 68. Ho Chia-Huan& Swan, K. 2007 “Evaluating student ratings of teacher behaviour” Learning online conversation in an asynchronous Environments Research 4: 51–85,. learning environment: An application of 84. Kankkunen, M. 2001 “Concept mapping and Grice's cooperative principle”The Internet and peirce’s semiotic paradigm meet in the Higher Education, Volume 10, Issue 1, , Pages classroom environment” Learning 3-14 Environments Research 4: 287–324,. 69. Hoek, D. J. & Seegers, G. “Effects of 85. Karagiannopoulou E. & Christodoulides P. instruction on verbal interactions during 2005 “The impact of Greek University collaborative problem solving” Learning students’ perceptions of their learning Environments Research (2005) 8: 19–39 environment on approaches to studying and 70. Hofstein, A., Kesner, M. & Ben-Zvi R. 2000 academic outcomes” International Journal of “Student perceptions of industrial chemistry Educational Research, Volume 43, Issue classroom learning environments” Learning 6, , Pages 329-350 Environments Research 2: 291–306,. 86. Kember D. & Leung D. Y. P. “The influence 71. Hofstein, A., Nahum, T. L. & Shore, R. 2001 of the teaching and learning environment on “Assessment of the learning environment of the development of generic capabilities needed inquiry-type laboratories in high school for a knowledge-based society” Learning chemistry” Learning Environments Research Environments Research (2005) 8: 245–266 4: 193–207 87. Kember, D.; Leung, D.Y.P. 2006 72. Hong, E. 2001 “Homework style, homework “Characterizing a teaching and learning environment and academic achievement” environment conducive to making demos on Learning Environments Research 4: 7–23,. students while not making their workload 73. Howley, A., Kusimo, P. S. & Parrott L. 2001 excessive” Studies in Higher Education 2 “Grading and the ethos of effort” Learning ;185-198 Environments Research 3: 229–246,. 88. Kiley, T. J. & Jensen, Rita A. 1998 74. Huang, S, L. 2003 “Antecedents to “Cooperating and student teachers’ actual and psychosocial environments in middle school preferred learning environments: a matched- classrooms in taiwan” Learning Environments pair analysis” Learning Environments Research Research 6: 119–135,. 1: 181–197 75. Huang, S.L. 2001 “Teachers’ perceptions of 89. Kim, J.& Lorsbach A. W. “Writing self-efficacy high school environments” Learning in young children: issues for the early grades Environments Research 4: 159–173,. environment” Learning Environments 76. Hudson, J. 2005 “Collaboration, inquiry, and Research (2005) 8: 157–175 reflection: a principal creates a cfg-inspired 90. Kim, K.; Grabowski, B. L.; Sharma, P. 2004 learning environment” Educational Horizons “Designing a Classroom as a Learner- 84 58-59 Centered Learning Environment Prompting 77. Johnson B, & Mcclure R, 2004 “Validity and Students' Reflective Thinking in K-12” : reliability of a shortened, revised version of the Association for Educational constructivist learning environment survey Communications & Technology; 27th, (cles)” Learning Environments Research 7: Chicago, İL, October 19-23 65–80, 91. Kitsantas, A. & Chow A. 2007 “College 78. Johnson, B. & Joseph J. S. 2006 “Student students’ perceived threat and preference for achievement and elementary seeking help in traditional, distributed, and teachers’perceptions of school climate” distance learning environments” Computers & Learning Environments Research 9:111–122 Education, 3;383-395 79. Johnson, B. & Stevens J. J. 2001 “Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the school 92. Kleinsasser, R. C. 2000 “A professional level environment questionnaire (sleq)” development school’s evolution potential: Learning Environments Research 4: 325–344,. teachers’ initial perceptions of their teaching

101 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

and learning community” Learning 104. Levy, J., Brok, P., Wubbels, T. & Brekelmans, Environments Research 2: 265–289,. M. 2003 “Students’ perceptions of 93. Kock A., Sleegers P. & Voeten M. J.M. 2005 interpersonal aspects of the learning “New learning and choices of secondary environment” Learning Environments school teachers when arranging learning Research 6: 5–36 environments” Teaching and Teacher 105. Li, Y. L. 2004 “Pupil-teacher interactions in Education, Volume 21, Issue 7, October Pages hong kong kindergarten classrooms – its 799-816 implications for teachers’ professional 94. Kong S. C. & Winnie W. M. 2006 “A study of development” Learning Environments building a resource-based learning Research 7: 23–42 environment with the inquiry learning 106. Lindblom-Ylänne S., Pihlajamäki H. & Kotkas, approach: Knowledge of family trees” T. 2003 “What makes a student group Computers & Education, In Press, Corrected successful? student-student and student- Proof, Available online 16 May, teacher interaction in a problem-based learning environment” Learning 95. Koul, R. B. & Fisher D. L. “cultural Environments Research 6: 59–76 background & students’ perceptions of science 107. Lipponen, L. 2000 “Towards knowledge classroom learning environment & teacher building:from facts to explanations in interpersonal behaviour in jammu, primary students’ computer mediated india”Learning Environments Research (2005) discourse” Learning Environments Research 8: 195–211 3: 179–199 96. Kreijns, K., Kirschner P. A., Jochems, W. & 108. Liu, M.; Bera, S.; Corliss, S. B., 2004 Buuren H. 2005 “Measuring perceived “Understanding the connection between sociability of computer-supported collaborative cognitive tool use & cognitive processes as learning environments” used by sixth graders in a problem-based Computers & Education, In Press, Corrected hypermedia learning environment” Journal Proof, Available online 2 August, of Educational Computing Research 31 309- 97. Kuklinski, M. R. & Weinstein, R. S. 2000 334 “Classroom and grade level differences in the 109. Liu, M.; Hsieh, P. (Pei-Hsuan); Cho, Y., 2006 stability of teacher expectations and perceived “Middle school students' self-efficacy, differential teacher treatment” Learning attitudes, and achievement in a computer- Environments Research 3: 1–34,. enhanced problem-based learning 98. Kunter M. , Baumert J. “Who is the expert? environment” Journal of İnteractive Construct and criteria validity of student and Learning Research 3 ;225-242 teacher ratings of instruction” Learning 110. Logan K. A., Barbara J. C. & Rennie L. 2006 Environments Research (2006) 9:231–251 “Measuring the computer classroom 99. Kurz, T. B. & Knight, S. L. 2004 “An environment: lessons learned from using a exploration of the relationship among teacher new instrument” Learning Environments efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, & goal Research 9: 67–93 consensus” Learning Environments Research 111. Lorsbach, A. W. & Basolo, F., J. 1998 7: 111–128,. “Collaborating in the evolution of a middle 100. Lam Y. J. L. 2004 “Exploring the sources and school science learning environment” relationships that propel organisational Learning Environments Research 1: 115– learning: an investigation of some western 127 australian schools” Learning Environments 112. Lorsbach, A. W. & Jinks, J. L. 1999 “Self- Research 7: 81–102 efficacy theory and learning environment 101. Lawrenz, F.; Huffman, D..; Appeldoorn, K. research” Learning Environments Research 2005 “Enhancing the instructional 2: 157–167 environment: optimal learning in 113. Loup K. S. 1997 “Measuring the professional introductory science classes” Journal of learning environment of schools: Linkages College Science Teaching 7; p40-45 to school effectiveness and effects” 102. Leahy, M.; Twomey, D. 2005 “Using web International Journal of Educational design with pre-service teachers as a means Research, Volume 27, Issue4, Pages321-331 of creating a collaborative learning 114. Löhner S., Joolingen W. R., Savelsbergh E. R.& environment” Educational Media Hout-Wolters B. 2005 “Students’ reasoning İnternational 42;143-151 during modeling in an inquiry learning 103. Lee J., Hong N. L. & Ling N. L. 2001 “An environment”Computers in Human analysis of students' preparation for the Behavior, Volume 21, Issue 3, May, Pages virtual learning environment” The Internet 441-461 and Higher Education, Volume 4, Issues 3-4, 115. Lüdtke O. , Trautwein U. , Kunter M., Jürgen , Pages 231-242 B. 2006 “Reliability and agreement of student ratings of the classroom

102 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

environment: A reanalysis of TİMSS data” year 12 chemistry classroom” Learning Learning Environments Research 9:215– Environments Research 3: 209–227 230 130. Meij J.& Jong T. 2006 “Supporting students' 116. Mackie, B.; Gutierrez, C. F. 2005 “Using learning with multiple representations in a pictures as a vehicle to personalize the dynamic simulation-based learning collaborative learning environment” Journal of environment” Learning and Instruction, 3, Educational Technology Systems 3 ;189-204 199-212 117. Maclellan E. & Soden R. 2006 “Facilitating 131. Monsen J. J. & Frederickson N. 2004 self-regulation in higher education through “Teachers’ attitudes towards mainstreaming & self-report” Learning Environments Research their pupils’ perceptions of their classroom 9: 95–110 learning environment” Learning Environments 118. Majeed, A., Fraser B. J. & Aldridge J. M. 2002 Research 7: 129–142 “Learning environment and its association 132. Mucherah, W. M. 2003 “The influence of withstudent satisfaction among mathematics technology on the classroom climate of social students in brunei darussalam” Learning studies classrooms: a multidimensional Environments Research 5: 203–226 approach” Learning Environments Research 119. Mann, S. J. 2005 “Alienation in the learning 6: 37–57 environment: a failure of community?” Studies 133. Newby, M. & Fisher D. 2000 “A model of in Higher Education 1;43-55 the relationship between university computer 120. Maor, D. 2000 “A teacher professional laboratory environment and student development program on using a constructivist outcomes” Learning Environments Research multimedia learning environment” Learning 3: 51–66,. Environments Research 2: 307–330 134. Nichols, J. D. 2006 “Empowerment and 121. Marín R., Sanz P.J., Coltell O., Inesta J.M., relationships: A classroom model to enhance Barber F. & Corella D. 1997 “Student-teacher student motivation” Learning Environments communication directed to computer-based Research 9:149–161 learning 135. Nijhuis J., Segers M. & Gijselaers W. 2007 environments”Displays, Volume17,Issues3- “The extent of variability in learning strategies 4, 1May, Page167-178 and students' perceptions of the learning 122. Marjoribanks, K, 1999. “Environmental and environment” Learning and Instruction, In individual influences on adolescents’ Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 27 aspirations: a moderation-mediation model” March, Learning Environments Research 2: 43–64 136. Nijhuis, J. F.H., Mien S.R. S. & Wim, H. G. 123. Marjoribanks, K. 2003 “Learning 2005 “Influence of redesigning a learning environments, family contexts, educational environment on student perceptions & aspirations & attainment: a moderation- learning strategies” Learning Environments mediation model extended” Learning Research 8: 67–93 Environments Research 6: 247–265 137. Nix, R. K., Fraser B. J. & Ledbette C. E. 124. Marrateacher R. “Beliefs: the impact of the 2005.“Evaluating an integrated science learning design of constructivist learning environments environment using the constructivist learning on instructor epistemologies” Learning environment survey” Learning Environments Environments Research (2005) 8: 135–155 Research 8: 109 -133 125. Marttunen, M. & Laurinen L. 2002 “Quality 138. O’connor, S. & Anne R. 2004 “Webct role- of students’ argumentation by e-mail” Learning playing: immediacy versus e-mediacy in Environments Research 5: 99–123 learning environments” Learning 126. Marx, A., Urs F.& Hartig T. 2000 “Effects Environments Research 7: 183–201,. of classroom seating arrangements on 139. Offir B., Barth I., Lev Y. & Shteinbok A. children’s question-asking” Learning 2003 “Teacher–student interactions and Environments Research 2: 249–263,. learning outcomes in a distance learning 127. McGill, L; Nicol, D; Littlejohn, A. 2005 environment” The Internet and Higher “Creating an information-rich learning Education, Volume 6, Issue1, 1st environment to enhance design student Quarter, Pages 65-75 learning: challenges and approaches” British 140. Oliver-Hoyo, M.; Allen, D.; Hunt, W. F., Journal of Educational Technology 4 ;629-642 2004 “Effects of an active learning 128. Mcgonigal, J, A. 1999 “Constructing a environment: teaching innovations at a learning environment that scaffolds science research institution” Journal of Chemical inquiry in first grade” Learning Environments Education 81 441-448 Research 2: 21–41 141. Ommundsen, Y. 2001 “Students’ implicit 129. Mcrobbie, C. J. & Thomas, G. P. 2001 theories of ability in physicaleducation classes: “Changing the learning environment to the influence of motivationalaspects of the enhance explaining and underst&ing in a learning environment” Learning Environments Research 4: 139–158

103 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

142. Papastergiou, M. 2005 “Learning to design 154. Rickards, T., Brok P.& Fisher D. 2005 “The and implement educational web sites within australian science teacher: a typology of pre-service training: a project-based learning teacher–student interpersonal behaviour in environment and its impact on student australian science classes” Learning teachers” Learning, Media and Technology 3 Environments Research 8: 267–287 ;263-279 155. Roelofs, E., Jacqueline V. & Jan T. 2003 143. Park, C. C. 2001 “Learning style preferences “Preferences For Various Learning of armenian, african,hispanic, hmong, korean, Environments: Teachers’ & Parents’ mexican, & anglostudents in american Perceptions” Learning Environments Research secondary schools” Learning Environments 6: 77–110,. Research 4: 175–191. 156. Roth W.1997, “The interaction of learning 144. Parsons, E. C. 2002 “Using comparisons of environments and student discourse about multiage learning environments to understand knowing, learning, and the nature of science: two teachers’democratic educational aims” Two longitudinal case studies”International Learning Environments Research 5: 185–202,. Journal of Educational Research, Volume 27, 145. Paul, C. 2001 “Newhouse development & Issue 4, Pages 311-320 use of an instrument forcomputer-supported 157. Roth, W. 2000 “Learning environments learning” Learning Environments Research 4: research, lifeworld analysis, and solidarity in 115–138 practice” Learning Environments Research 2: 146. Pedaste, M.; Sarapuu, T 2006 “The factors 225–247 influencing the outcome of solving story 158. Roth, W., Tobin, K. & Zimmermann, A. problems in a web-based learning 2002 “Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing: environment” İnteractive Learning learning environments research as classroom Environments 2;53-176 praxis” Learning Environments Research 5: 147. Pepper, K. & Thomas L. H. 2002 “Making a 1–28,. change: the effects of the leadership role on 159. Roth, W.1998 “Teacher-as-researcher school climate” Learning Environments reform: student achievement and perceptions Research 5: 155–166 of learning environment” Learning 148. Petegem, P., Donche V. & Vanhoof J. 2005 Environments Research 1: 75–93,. “Relating pre-service teachers’ approaches to 160. Roux, J. 2001 “Theory of interlocutory logic learning and preferences for constructivist and sequential analysis of interactive problem- learning environments” Learning solving situations: a powerful method” Environments Research 8: 309–332 Learning Environments Research 3: 247–264,. 149. Puntambekar, S.; Hubscher, R. 2005 “Tools 161. Saarenkunnas, M., Järvelä S., Häkkinen P., for scaffolding students in a complex learning Kuure L., Taalas P. & Kunelius. E. 2000 environment: what have we gained and what “Ninter networked interaction: theory-based have we missed? Educational Psychologist 1; cases in teaching and learning” Learning p1-12 Environments Research 3: 35–50,. 150. Raaij E. M. & Schepers J. J.L. 2006 “The 162. Saat, R. M. 2004 “The acquisition of acceptance and use of a virtual learning integrated science process skills in a web-based environment in China Computers & learning environment” Research in Science & Education, In Press, Corrected Technological Education 1;23-40 Proof, Available online 27 October, 163. Salovaara, H. & Järvelä, S. 2003 “Students’ 151. Rasku-Puttonen, H. Etelapelto, A.; strategic actions in computer-supported Lehtonen, O., 2004 “Developing teachers' collaborative learning” Learning Environments professional expertise through collaboration in Research 6: 267–285,. an innovative ict-based learning environment” 164. Samson S.& Millet M. S. 2003 “The learning European Journal of Teacher Education 27 environment: First-year students, teaching ;47-60 assistants, and information literacy”Research 152. Rasmussen I., Krange I. & Ludvigsen S.R. Strategies, Volume 19, Issue 2, , Pages 84-98 2003 “The process of understanding the task: how is agency distributed between students, 165. Segers M., Bossche P. V.& Teunissen E. teachers and representations in technology-rich 2003 “Evaluating the effects of redesigning a learning environments?” International Journal problem-based learning environment” Studies of Educational Research, Volume 39, Issue In Educational Evaluation, Volume 29, Issue 4, 8,, Pages839-849 Pages315-334 153. Rayneri, L. J.; Gerber, B. L.; Wiley, L. P. 166. Segers, M., Dochy, F. .& De Corte, E. 1999 2006 “The relationship between classroom “Assessment practices and students’ environment and the learning style preferences knowledge profiles in a problem-based of gifted middle school students and the curriculum” Learning Environments Research impact on levels of performance” Gifted 2: 191–213 Child Quarterly 2; 104-118

104 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

167. Seidel,T. 2006 “The role of student 180. Swaak, J. & Learner, T.. 2001 “System characteristics in studying micro teaching– control in using online support for simulation- learning environments” Learning based discovery” learning” Learning Environments Research 9:253–271 Environments Research 4: 217–241,. 168. Shapiro, B,, Richards, L,, Ross N, & Kim 181. Tal, R. T. 2001 “Incorporating field trips as Kendal-Knitter 1999 “Time and the science learningenvironment enrichment an environments of schooling” Learning interpretive study” Learning Environments Environments Research 2: 1–19,. Research 4: 25–49,. 169. Shavelson Richard J. & Seidel Tina 182. Taylor P. & Mulhall A. 2001 Linking “Approaches in measuring learning learning environments through agricultural environments” Learning Environments experience enhancing the learning process in Research (2006) 9:195–197 rural primary schools 170. Sinclair, B. B. & Fraser, B. J. 2002 International Journal of Educational “Changing classroom environments in urban Development, Volume 21, Issue middle schools” Learning Environments 2, January, Pages 135-148 Research 5: 301–328, 171. Skouras, A. S. 2006 “Coordinating formal 183. Templeton, R. A. & Johnson, C. E. Making and informal aspects of mathematics in a 1998 “The school environment safe:red rose’s computer based learning formula” Learning Environments Research 1: environment” İnternational Journal of 35–57,. Mathematical Education in Science & 184. Terrell S. R. 2005, A longitudinal Technology 947-964 investigation of the effect of information 172. Sluijsmans D., Dochy F. & Moerkerke G. perception and focus on attrition in online 1999 “Creating a learning environment by learning environments using self-,peer- and co-assessment” Learning The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 8, Environments Research 1: 293–319,. Issue 3, 3rd Quarter Pages 213-219 173. Srinivasan, S.; Crooks, S. 2005 185. Thomas G. P. & Mee Doris Au Kin “Multimedia in a science learning “Changing the learning environment to environment” Journal of Educational enhancestudents’ metacognition in hong kong Multimedia & Hypermedia 2 ;151-167 primary school classrooms” Learning 174. Stark Robin 2004 “Implementing example- Environments Research (2005) 8: 221–243 based learning and teaching in the context of 186. Thomas, G. P. 2003 “Conceptualisation, vocational school education in business development and validation of an instrument administration” Learning Environments for investigating the metacognitive orientation Research 7: 143–163,. of science classroom learning environments: 175. Steelman, J. D.; Grable, L. L.; Vasu, E. S. the metacognitive orientation learning 2004 “Expanding global awareness: the use of environment scale science (Moles-S)” Learning student-developed multimedia created in a Environments Research 6: 175–197,. cooperative learning 187. Tobin, K. 1998 “Qualitative Perceptions Of environment”İnternational Journal of Social Learning EnvironmentsOn The World Wide Education 2 ;41-48 Web” Learning Environments Research 1: 176. Stefanou, C. R. & Salisbury-Glennon J. D. 139–162,. 2002 “Developing motivation and cognitive 188. Tobin, K. 2000 “Catalysing changes in learningstrategies through an undergraduate research on learning environments:regional learning community” Learning Environments editor’s introduction” Learning Environments Research 5: 77–97,. Research 2: 223–224,. 177. Stevens, L., Werkhoven W., Stokking K., 189. Tsai ,Chin-Chung 2007 “The preferences Castelijns, J. & Jager, Auktje 2001 “Interactive toward constructivist Internet-based learning instruction to prevent attention problems in environments among university students in class” Learning Environments Research 3: Taiwan” Computers in Human Behavior, In 265–286 Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 7 178. Struyven K., Dochy F., Janssens S. & Gielen February, S. 2006 “On the dynamics of students' 190. Turnbull, B. 2002 “Teacher participation and approaches to learning: The effects of the buy-in:implications for school reform teaching/learning environment” Learning and initiatives” Learning Environments Research Instruction, Volume 16, Issue 4, August, Pages 5: 235–252,. 279-294 191. Tynjälä P. 1999 “Towards expert 179. Struyven, K.; Dochy, F.; Janssens, S. 2006 knowledge? A comparison between a “On the dynamics of students' approaches to constructivist and a traditional learning learning: the effects of the teaching/learning environment in the university” International environment”Learning & İnstruction 16 279- Journal of Educational Research, Volume 31, 294

105 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

Issue 5, 1 January, Pages 357-442 mathematics” Learning Environments Research 6: 309–326,. 192. Tynjälä P.1997 “Developing education 204. Wen M. L., Tsai C., Lin H.& Chuang S. 2004 students' conceptions of the learning process “Cognitive–metacognitive and content- in different learning environments” Learning technical aspects of constructivist Internet- and Instruction, Volume 7, Issue based learning environments: a LISREL 3, September, Pages 277-292 analysis” Computers & Education, Volume 43, 193. Veermans, K.; van Joolingen, W.; de Jong, T. Issue 3, November, Pages 237-248 2006 “Use of heuristics to facilitate scientific 205. Wierstra, R. F. A., Kanselaar, G., Van Der discovery learning in a simulation learning Linden Jos L. & Lodewijks, H, G. L. C. 1999 environment in a physics domain” “learning environment perceptions of İnternational Journal of Science Education european university students” Learning 4;341-361 Environments Research 2: 79–98, 194. Vermetten Y. J., Vermunt J. D. & Lodewijks 206. Wong S. L., Ab Jalil H., Ayub A. F. M., Abu H. G. 2002 “Powerful learning environments? Bakar . & Tang S.H. 2003 “Teaching a discrete How university students differ in their information technology course in a response to instructional measures” constructivist learning environment: is it Learning and Instruction, Volume 12, Issue effective for Malaysianpre-service teachers?” 3, June, Pages 263-284 The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 6, 195. Wahyudi & David, F. T. 2004 “The status of Issue 2, 2nd Quarter, Pages193-204 science classroom learning environments in 207. Yan L. & Kember D. 2003 “Influence of the indonesian lower secondary schools” Learning curriculum and learning environment on group Environments Research 7: 43–63, learning approaches outside the classroom” 196. Waldrip, B, G. & Fisher, D. L. 2003 Learning Environments Research 6: 285–307,. “Identifying exemplary science teachers 208. Yang C., Tsai I-Chun, Kim B., Cho M.& through their classroom interactions with Laffey J. M. 2006 “Exploring the relationships students”Learning Environments Research 6: between students' academic motivation and 157–174,. social ability in online learning environments” 197. Walker S. L. & Fraser, B. J. “Development The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 9, and validation of an instrument for assessing Issue 4, 4th Quarter, Pages 277-286 distance education learning environments in 209. Yang, Y. 2006 “Effects of embedded higher education: the distance education strategies on promoting the use of self- learning environments survey (deles)” Learning regulated learning strategies in an online Environments Research (2005) 8: 289–308 learning environment” Journal of Educational 198. Wallace J., Venville G. & Ching-Yang Chou Technology Systems 3;257-269 2002 “Cooperate is when you don’t fight”: 210. Yeo S. & Taylor P. & Kulski, M. students’ underst&ings of their classroom “Internationalising a learning environment learning environment” Learning Environments instrument for evaluating transnational online Research 5: 133–153,. university courses” “Learning Environments 199. Wang, S.; Yang, C. 2005 “The ınterface Research (2006) 9:179–194 design and the usability testing of a 211. Young, D. J. 2000 “Teacher morale in fossilization web-based learning western australia: a multilevel model” Learning environment” Journal of Science Education & Environments Research 3: 159–177, Technology 14 305-313 212. Zandvliet D. B. & Fraser, B. J. 2005 200. Waugh, R. F. & F R.. C. 2002 “Measuring “Physical and psychosocial environments parent receptivity towards the classroom associated with networked classrooms” environment using a rasch measurement Learning Environments Research 8: 1–17 model” Learning Environments Research 5: 329–352,. 201. Waxman H. C., Huang S.L. and Wang M. C. Ph. D Theses and Master Theses 1997 “Investigating the classroom learning environment of resilient and non-resilient 1. Allen, Debra (2003) Parent and student students from inner-city elementary schools” perceptions of the science learning International Journal of Educational environment and its influence on student Research, Volume 27, Issue 4, , Pages 343-353 outcomes. PhD Curtin University of Technology, AUSTRALIA 202. Waxman, H. C. & Huang S.L. 1998 2. Austin, Debra S., (2004) New literacies: Are “classroom learning environments in urban Colorado teacher education programs elementary, middle, and high schools” preparing pre-service teachers to use Learning Environments Research 1: 95–113,. technology in their learning environments? 203. Webster, B. J. & Fisher, D. L. 2003 “School- Ph.D., University of Denver level environment and student outcomes in

106 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

3. Avila, Luis (2006). Design, implementation, 16. Denholme, Kelly (2004). A description of and evaluation of two laboratory course classroom and field based learning constructivist learning environments, Ph.D., environments, M.A., Simon Fraser University Columbia University (Canada) 4. Barrera, Hector Rangel (2005). Perceptions of 17. Edwards, Nicole C. (2006). School facilities Mexican American at-risk students in the and student achievement: Student perspectives completion and non-completion of school in on the connection between the urban learning alternative learning environments environment and student motivation and by, Ph.D., The University of Texas at Austin performance, Ph.D., The Ohio State University 5. Berg, Carl Anders Rune (2005). Learning 18. Fies, Carmen Hedwig (2005). Classroom chemistry at the university level: Student response systems: What do they add to an attitudes, motivation and design of the learning active learning environment?, Ph.D., The environment, Ph.D., Umea Universitet University of Texas at Austin. (Sweden) 19. Fullick, Patrick Leslie Knowledge building 6. Brown, Ann P., (2004). Learning environment among school students working in a networked and attitudinal differences between resilient, computer-supported learning environment, average, and non-resilient fourth- and fifth- Ph.D., University of Southampton (United grade Hispanic students Kingdom) Ed.D., University of Houston, 20. Gomez Santamaria, Paola (2006) CA-OLE: A 7. Brownley, Blanche Smith (2004). An collaborative and adaptive online learning ethnographic case study of classroom learning environment”, M.S., The University of Texas environments in a school once identified as a at Arlington high-poverty/high-achieving urban school, 21. Goulet, Linda May (2005). Creating culturally Ed.D., The George Washington University meaningful learning environments: Teacher 8. Busbea, Stephanie Dickson (2006).The effect actions to engage Aboriginal students in of constructivist learning environments on learning, Ph.D., The University of Regina student learning in an undergraduate art (Canada) appreciation courseby, Ph.D., University of 22. Halverson, Taylor David (2006). Improving North Texas blended learning environments for biblical 9. Chandra, Vinesh (2004) The impact of a studies: Applications of the "innovations in blended web-based learning environment on distance education" theory, Ph.D., Indiana the perceptions, attitudes, and performance of University boys and girls in junior science and senior 23. Harington, Darrel G. (2001) The development physics PhD Curtin University of Technology, and validation of a learning environment AUSTRALIA instrument for CSIRO Science Education 10. Chin, George (2004). A case study in the Centres PhD Curtin University of participatory design of a collaborative science- Technology, AUSTRALIA based learning environment, Ph.D., Virginia 24. Honeycutt, Barbi T. (2005). Students' Polytechnic Institute and State University perceptions and experiences in a learning 11. Christensen, William Robert (2005).The effects environment that uses an instructional game as of cognitive load conditions upon a teaching strategy, Ph.D., North Carolina performance, anxiety, and self-efficacy in State University computer-based learning environments. Ph.D., 25. Idiris, Suleiman Alhaji (1994) An investigation The University of Oklahoma of the nature and effects of the learning 12. Chu, Shaiu-Lung (2006). Investigating the environment in agricultural science classrooms effectiveness of redundant text and animation in Nigeria PhD Curtin University of in multimedia learning environments, Ph.D., Technology, AUSTRALIA University of Central Florida, 26. Ireland, Dennis V. (2000) The implementation 13. Corliss, Stephanie Brooks (2005). The effects of a collaborative peer interactive mathematics of reflective prompts and collaborative learning classroom learning environment. PhD Curtin in hypermedia problem-based learning University of Technology, AUSTRALIA environments on problem solving and 27. Kempler, Toni M (2006). Optimizing students' metacognitive skills, Ph.D., The University of motivation in inquiry-based learning Texas at Austin environments: The role of instructional 14. Crump, Barbara Jill (2002) First-Year practices, Ph.D., University of Michigan Programming Students’ Perceptions of Their 28. Kijkosol, Duangsmorn (2005) Teacher-student Tertiary Learning Environment PhD Curtin interactions and laboratory learning University of Technology, AUSTRALIA environments in biology classes in Thailand 15. Dawan, Jaami. (2005). African American PhD Curtin University of Technology, students' perceptions of a technology- AUSTRALIA enhanced learning environment: A case study. 29. Kiriakidis, Peter (2005). A path analysis of Ed.D., Northern Illinois University, factors that effect student satisfaction in the

107 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

online learning environment, Ph.D., Touro perceived impact on the learning environment University International. as reported by middle school administrators 30. Koul, Rekha B. (2003) Teacher-Student and teachers in the Humble Independent Interactions and Science Classroom Learning School District, Humble, Texas” Ph.D Environments in India PhD Curtin University Thesis, Texas A&M University of Technology, AUSTRALIA 44. Moron-Garcia, Susan Doreen (2005). 31. Le, Andrew Phong (2006). Design patterns for Understanding lecturers' use of virtual learning online learning environments: A structured environments to support face-to-face teaching approach for operationalizing and sharing in United Kingdom higher education theory-based design knowledge, M.S., , Ph.D., Open University (United Kingdom) University of Colorado at Boulder 45. Moss, Cindy Hoffner (2003) Improving 32. Leelawong, Krittaya (2005). Using the learning- learning environment and student outcomes in by-teaching paradigm to design intelligent biology in North Carolina PhD Curtin learning environments, Ph.D., Vanderbilt University of Technology, AUSTRALIA University 46. Nair, Chenicheri C. (1999) Transition from 33. Leh, Deborah Kay (2006). An examination of senior secondary to higher education : a the impact of the structure of learning learning environment perspective. PhD Curtin environments on conditions for student University of Technology, AUSTRALIA success, satisfaction, and self-efficacy 47. Newby, Michael (1998) A study of the . Ed.D., University of Rochester effectiveness of computer laboratory classes as 34. Lillis, David A. (1999) Ethnic minority science learning environments. PhD Curtin University students in New Zealand : attitudes and of Technology, AUSTRALIA learning environments. PhD Curtin University 48. Newell, Terrance S (2006). Rethinking of Technology, AUSTRALIA information literacy learning environments: A 35. Lillis, David A. (1999) Ethnic minority science study to examine the effectiveness of two students in New Zealand : attitudes and learning approaches, Ph.D., The University of learning environments. PhD Curtin University Wisconsin - Madison of Technology, AUSTRALIA 49. Newhouse, Christopher P. (1997) Teachers' 36. Lin, Yi-Mei (2005). Understanding students' responses and classroom learning technology appropriation and learning environments associated with student access to perceptions in online learning environments, portable computers. PhD Curtin University of Ph.D., University of Missouri - Columbia Technology, AUSTRALIA 37. Liu, Yuanliang (2005). Design of learning 50. Nicholson, Lindsay P. (1997) Educational objects to support constructivist learning productivity of an open learning environment environments, M.S., University of Missouri - within the vocational education and training Columbia sector in Western Australia. PhD Curtin 38. Lorentz, Susan C., (2005). Aspects of the University of Technology, AUSTRALIA academic learning environment (school 51. Nix, Rebekah Kincaid (2003) Virtual Field climate) in three high-poverty middle schools Trips: Using Information Technology to implementing a school climate improvement Create an Integrated Science Learning program. Ph.D., Union Institute and Environment. PhD Curtin University of University. Technology, AUSTRALIA 39. Maguire, Kevin Paul (2005). Professional 52. Pascal, Matthew M., (2006). No Child Left development in a blended e-learning Behind in the mathematics classroom: A environment for middle school mathematics regional assessment of the impacts of the No teachers, M.A., University of Toronto (Canada) Child Left Behind Act of 2001 on the 40. Marcello, Angelica (2006) .Contemplating the mathematics learning environment Ph.D., The evolution of attachment and cognition in a American University collaborative learning environment. University 53. Puacharearn, Panomporn (2004) The of California Effectiveness of Constructivist Teaching on 41. Margianti, Eko (2001) Sri Learning Improving Learning Environments in Thai environment, mathematics achievement and Secondary School Science Classrooms . PhD student attitudes among university computing Curtin University of Technology, students in Indonesia PhD Curtin University AUSTRALIA of Technology, AUSTRALIA 54. Rawnsley, David G. (1997) Associations 42. Mercer, Melissa Jo (2006). Prospective between classroom learning environments, teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning: teacher interpersonal behaviour and student Using "free choice" learning environments to outcomes in secondary mathematics foster change, Ph.D., University of Michigan classrooms. PhD Curtin University of 43. Monk, Douglas Matthew. (2006). An Technology, AUSTRALIA assessment of the quality and educational 55. Rita, Ronald (2005). Perceptions of the adequacy of educational facilities and their learning environment and associations with

108 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

cognitive achievement of gifted and non-gifted environments: The relationship between sense biology students D., M.S., California State of community and participation” University Ph.D., The University of Arizona 56. Rocha, Joao Carlos Nunes da (2005). Teachers' 68. Spence, Dianna J., (2004). Engagement with and students' perceptions of community mathematics courseware in traditional and characteristics in a learning environment in one online learning environments: Relationship to Brazilian university, Ph.D., Trinity Evangelical motivation, achievement, gender, and gender Divinity School orientation. Ph.D., Emory University 57. Rojas, Paul (2005). Developing and sustaining 69. Struyven, Katrien (2005). The effects of positive learning environments in student-activating teaching/learning urban/suburban settings: An exploration of environments on students' perceptions, student three high schools with significantly changed performance and pre-service teachers' teaching, demographics, Ed.D., Northern Illinois Ph.D., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven University (Belgium) 58. Santiboon, Toansakul (2006) Laboratory 70. Su, Bude, (2006). Experiences of and learning environments and teacher-student preferences for interactive instructional interactions in physics classes in Thailand. activities in online learning environment, PhD Curtin University of Technology, Ph.D., Indiana University, AUSTRALIA 71. Tan, Ashley (2006). Does scaffolded blogging 59. Schneider, Barbara P., (2004). Making the promote preservice teacher reflection? informal formal: An examination of why and Examining the relationships between learning how teachers and students leverage experiences tool and scaffolding in a blended learning in informal learning environments environment, Ph.D., Indiana University Ph.D., Stanford University, 72. Taylor, Krista Leigh (2005). An examination of 60. Sebela, Mokgoko Petrus (2003) Using teacher student interactions and mathematical action research to promote constructivist knowledge-building by dyads of grade 7/8 learning environments in mathematics classes students in a Web-based learning environment, in South Africa. PhD Curtin University of M.Ed., Queen's University at Kingston Technology, AUSTRALIA (Canada). 61. Shockley, David Russell (2005). Learning 73. Thomas, Sandra Hutton (2005). Student styles and students' perceptions of satisfaction perceptions of support services designed to in community college web-based learning overcome barriers in the online learning environments by, Ed.D., North Carolina State environment of Illinois community colleges, University Ed.D., University of Illinois at Urbana- 62. Simmons, Jeffery A (2006). An investigation Champaign into the role of learning styles in student 74. Turner, Steven L., (2005). How students learn satisfaction with on-line learning and how teachers teach: An investigation of environments”, D.B.A., Nova Southeastern middle and secondary science teachers' University instructional practices and alignment of 63. Siragusa, Lucio (Lou) Paul (2005) Identification instruction with the How People Learn (HPL) of effective instructional design principles and framework for effective learning environments learning strategies for students studying in and instruction Ph.D., University of Virginia Web-based learning environments in higher 75. Wahyudi (2004) Educational practice and education . PhD Curtin University of learning environments in rural and urban lower Technology, AUSTRALIA secondary science classrooms in Kalimantan 64. Snyder, Wayne (2005). Is there a correlation Selatan, Indonesia . PhD Curtin University of between students' perceptions of their middle Technology, AUSTRALIA school science classroom learning environment 76. Waldrip, Bruce Gordon (1994) A study of and their classroom grades?, Ph.D., The achievement, attitudes, teaching practices and Claremont Graduate University learning environments in secondary school 65. So, Hyo-Jeong (2006). Examining the science laboratory classes in Papua New relationships among collaborative learning, Guinea . PhD Curtin University of social presence and satisfaction in a distance Technology, AUSTRALIA learning environment, Ph.D., Indiana 77. Walker, Scott L. (2003) Development and University Validation of an Instrument for Assessing 66. Soerjaningsih, Widia (2001) Student outcomes, Distance Education Learning Environments in learning environment, logical thinking and Higher Education: The Distance Education motivation among computing students in an Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Indonesian university. PhD Curtin University PhD Curtin University of Technology, of Technology, AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA 67. South, Susan, E., (2006) .Contributing factors 78. Webster, Beverley Joyce (2002) Modelling to engagement in online learning mathematics achievement: an Australian study

109 2007 by IJESE International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2007, 2(4), 98 – 110

of learning environments in education. PhD Curtin University of Technology, AUSTRALIA 79. Williams, Melody Ann (2004). Exploring the effects of a multimedia case-based learning environment in pre-service science teacher education in Jamaica, Ph.D., Universiteit Twente (The Netherlands) 80. Wooten, Vera (1999) The effectiveness of a constructivist learning environment on learning in the high school science classroom. PhD Curtin University of Technology, AUSTRALIA 81. Wu, Wen-Chi (Vivian ) (2006) EFL optimal learning environment: Perspectives of faculty and students in a Taiwanese technical university, Ed.D., University of South Dakota, 82. Yeo, Shelley R. (2002) Evaluation of a University Physics Studio Learning Environment: The Interrelationships of Students’ Perceptions, Epistemological Beliefs and Cognitive Outcomes. PhD Curtin University of Technology, AUSTRALIA 83. Youngs, Henry David (2003) Creating a constructivist learning environment in a university mathematics classroom: a case study. PhD Curtin University of Technology, AUSTRALIA

IJESE ISSN: 1306 3065

110 2007 by IJESE