DOCSLIB.ORG

China: Lawyers and Activists Detained Or Questioned by Police Since 9 July 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
China: Lawyers and Activists Detained Or Questioned by Police Since 9 July 2015 China: Lawyers and Activists detained or questioned by police since 9 July 2015 Amnesty International has collated the list based on various sources and attempted to confirm all information. However, verification remains difficult and not all the information may be up to date. Note: In China, "summoned" refers to a particular procedure detailed in Criminal Law article 92 by which an individual regarded as a "criminal suspect" can be interrogated at a designated place but need not be arrested or formally detained. Total number of lawyers and activists targeted: 245 246 Total number of lawyers and activists is still missing or in police custody: 30 26 (Last update: 3.00pm Beijing time, 22 September 2015) Date Status Chinese name English Name Occupation City/ Province Gender As of 22 September No. Placed under residential surveillance, at an unknown Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law 1 9 July 2015 4am Taken away 王宇 Wang Yu Beijing F location on suspicion of Firm “inciting subversion of state power”. Placed under residential surveillance at an unknown 2 9 July 2015 12am Taken away 包龙军 Bao Longjun Lawyer, Husband of Wang Yu Beijing M location on suspicion of “inciting subversion of state power” on 26 August 2015. Tianjin Police handed him over 9 July 2015 12am; to Bao's sister on 10 July; his Not currently in police 3 包卓轩 Bao Zhuoxuan Son of Wang Yu and Bao Longjun Beijing M 17 July 2015 9am passport was confiscated by detention police; summoned by police 1 4 10 July 2015 7am Taken away 周世锋 Zhou Shifeng Lawyer, Head of Fengrui Law Firm Beijing M In police custody Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law 5 10 July 2015 8am Taken away 李姝云 Li Shuyun Beijing F Whereabouts unknown Firm Placed under residential surveillance, at an unknown Criminally detained on Legal Assistant of Zhou Shifeng, location on suspicion of 6 10 July 2015 8am suspicion of "picking quarrels 刘四新 Liu Sixin Beijing M Staff of Fengrui Law Firm "inciting subversion of state and provoking trouble power" on 18 September 2015 7 10 July 2015 8am Taken away 王芳 Wang Fang Accountant of Fengrui Law Firm Beijing F Whereabouts unknown 10 July 2015 Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law 8 Taken away 黄力群 Huang Liqun Beijing M In police custody morning Firm Placed under residential surveillance, at an unknown Criminally detained on location on suspicion of 10 July 2015 Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law 9 suspicion of “picking quarrels 王全璋 Wang Quanzhang Beijing M “picking quarrels and morning Firm and provoking trouble”. provoking trouble” and “inciting subversion of state power”. 10 July 2015 李金星 Li Jinxing Not currently in police 10 Office raided by the police Lawyer Beijing M afternoon ）又名伍雷（ ( a.k.a Wu Lei) custody In police custody. Tianjin City Public Security Bureau Hexi Sub-Branch rejected his 11 10 July 2015 2pm Taken away 李和平 Li Heping Lawyer Beijing M lawyer’s request to meet him, and refused to disclose where and why he was detained. 10 July 2015 Placed under residential 12 Detained on suspicion of 隋牧青 Sui Muqing Lawyer Guangdong M evening surveillance, at an unknown "picking quarrels and provoking location on suspicion of 2 trouble" "inciting subversion of state power" on 11 July 2015 at 9pm 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 13 Questioned by police 覃永沛 Qin Yongpei Lawyer Nanning M evening custody 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 14 Questioned by police 李威达 Li Weida Lawyer Hebei M evening custody 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 15 midnight； 13 July Questioned by police 王海军 Wang Haijun Lawyer Hunan custody 2015 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 16 Questioned by police 李大伟 Li Dawei Activist Gansu M midnight custody Placed under residential surveillance at an unknown Criminally detained on 赵威 Zhao Wei location on suspicion of 17 10 July 2015 suspicion of "picking quarrels Legal Assistant of Li Heping Beijing F ）又名考拉（ (a.k.a Kao La) “inciting subversion of state and provoking trouble" power” on 18 September 2015. 10 July 2015 Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law Not currently in police 18 Taken away 刘晓原 Liu Xiaoyuan Beijing M Afternoon Firm custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 19 Questioned by police 郭雄伟 Guo Xiongwei Lawyer Hunan M midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 20 Questioned by police 吕方芝 Lü Fangzhi Lawyer Hunan M midnight custody 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 21 midnight; 28 July Questioned by police 游飞翥 You Feizhu Lawyer Chongqing M custody 2015 6pm 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 22 Questioned by police 游忠洪 You Zhonghong Brother of You Feizhu Chongqing M midnight custody 3 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 23 Questioned by police 张雪忠 Zhang Xuezhong Lawyer Shanghai M midnight custody 12 July 2015 Summoned by police; Not currently in police 24 midnight; 13 July 王成 Wang Cheng Lawyer Zhejiang M Questioned by police custody 2015 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 25 Summoned by police 常伯阳 Chang Boyang Lawyer Henan M midnight custody 11 July 2015 Questioned by police; Not currently in police 26 midnight; 12 July 文东海 Wen Donghai Lawyer Hunan M Summoned by police custody 2015 evening 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 27 Questioned by police 曾维昶 Zeng Weicheng Lawyer Yunan M midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 28 Questioned by police 邹丽惠 Zou Lihui Lawyer Fujian F midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 29 Questioned by police 薛荣民 Xue Rongmin Lawyer Shanghai M midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 30 midnight; 15 July Questioned by police 杨金柱 Yang Jinzhu Lawyer Hunan M custody 2015 am 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 31 Taken away 秦雷 Qin Lei Lawyer Shanghai M midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 32 Questioned by police 钟颖 Zhong Ying Lawyer Shanghai F midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 33 Questioned by police 任全牛 Ren Quanniu Lawyer Henan M midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 34 Questioned by police 孟猛 Meng Meng Lawyer Henan M midnight custody 4 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 35 Questioned by police 姬来松 Ji Laisong Lawyer Henan M midnight custody 11 July 2015 Not currently in police 36 Questioned by police 刘文华 Liu Wenhua Lawyer Yunan M midnight custody 11 July 2015 37 Questioned by police 张凯 Zhang Kai Lawyer Beijing M In police custody* midnight Taken away on 11 July 2015 at 9pm; Placed under residential surveillance on suspicion of "inciting subversion of state power" 11 July 2015 9pm; and "disturbing court order" 38 13 July 2015 Taken away 谢阳 Xie Yang Lawyer Hunan M at an unknown location on afternoon 12 July. Changsha City Public Security Bureau rejected his lawyer's request to meet with him because Xie is suspected of state security crimes. Not currently in police 39 11 July 2015 7am Questioned by police 胡林政 Hu Linzheng Lawyer Hunan M custody 10 July 2015 Questioned by police; Taken 40 afternoon; 12 July 谢燕益 Xie Yanyi Lawyer Guangdong M In police custody away and his home was raided 2015 pm 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 41 Questioned by police 刘卫国 Liu Weiguo Lawyer Shangdong M afternoon custody 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 42 Questioned by police 马卫 Ma Wei Lawyer Tianjin M afternoon custody Placed under residential 10 July 2015 望云和尚 (又名性惠法 Monk Wangyun 43 Taken away Monk HRD, Supporter of Wu Gan Chengdu M surveillance, at an unknown morning 師、林斌) （a.k.a. Monk location on suspicion of Xinghui, Lin "inciting subversion of state 5 Bin） power" Placed under residential surveillance, at an unknown 10 July 2015 Gou Hongguo 44 Taken away 勾洪国 （又名）戈平 Activist, supporter of Wu Gan Tianjin M location on suspicion of afternoon (a.k.a. Ge Ping) "inciting subversion of state power" on 14 July 2015 Criminally detained on 10 July 2015 suspicion of "picking 45 Taken away 刘永平 Liu Yongping Activist, supporter of Wu Gan Beijing M Afternoon quarrels and provoking trouble" 10 July 2015 Not currently in police 46 Taken away 周庆 Zhou Qing Driver of Fengrui Law Firm Beijing M Morning custody Not currently in police 47 10 July 2015 Taken away 罗茜 Luo Xi Lawyer Hunan M custody Not currently in police 48 11 July 2015 4am Taken away 李发旺 Li Fawang Activist M custody Not currently in police 49 11 July 2015 Taken away 魏德丰 Wei Defeng Legal Assistant of Xie Yang Hunan M custody 10 July 2015 Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law Not currently in police 50 Questioned by police 张维玉 Zhang Weiyu Beijing M Morning Firm custody 10 July 2015 Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law Not currently in police 51 Questioned by police 江天勇 Jiang Tianyong Beijing M Morning Firm custody 11 July 2015 Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law Not currently in police 52 Summoned by police 刘士辉 Liu Shihui Guangdong M 11:30am Firm custody Taken away, his home was Not currently in police 53 11 July 2015 raided on 11 July, 17 July and 郑恩宠 Zheng Enchong Lawyer Shanghai M custody 7 August 2015 6 Lawyer, Lawyer of Fengrui Law Not currently in police 54 12 July 2015 Taken away 周立新 Zhou Lixin Guiyang M Firm custody 55 10 July 2015 Lost contact 胡石根 Hu Shigen Activist Beijing M Whereabouts unknown Placed under residential surveillance, at his home in 11 July 2015 56 Taken Away 徐知汉 Xu Zhihan Activist Shangdong M Zhengzhou, on suspicion of 4:55am "inciting subversion of state power" Not currently in police 57 Date unknown Questioned by police 左培生 Zuo Peisheng Lawyer Beijing M custody Not currently in police 58 Date unknown Questioned by police 倪玉兰 Ni Yulan Barefoot Lawyer Beijing F custody Questioned by police; Not currently in police 59 12 July 2015am 舒向新 Shu Xiangxin Lawyer Shandong M Questioned by police custody Not currently in police 60 Date unknown Questioned by police 徐红卫 Xu Hongwei Lawyer Shandong M custody
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 28. Rights Defense and New Citizen's Movement
    JOBNAME: EE10 Biddulph PAGE: 1 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Fri May 10 14:09:18 2019 28. Rights defense and new citizen’s movement Teng Biao 28.1 THE RISE OF THE RIGHTS DEFENSE MOVEMENT The ‘Rights Defense Movement’ (weiquan yundong) emerged in the early 2000s as a new focus of the Chinese democracy movement, succeeding the Xidan Democracy Wall movement of the late 1970s and the Tiananmen Democracy movement of 1989. It is a social movement ‘involving all social strata throughout the country and covering every aspect of human rights’ (Feng Chongyi 2009, p. 151), one in which Chinese citizens assert their constitutional and legal rights through lawful means and within the legal framework of the country. As Benney (2013, p. 12) notes, the term ‘weiquan’is used by different people to refer to different things in different contexts. Although Chinese rights defense lawyers have played a key role in defining and providing leadership to this emerging weiquan movement (Carnes 2006; Pils 2016), numerous non-lawyer activists and organizations are also involved in it. The discourse and activities of ‘rights defense’ (weiquan) originated in the 1990s, when some citizens began using the law to defend consumer rights. The 1990s also saw the early development of rural anti-tax movements, labor rights campaigns, women’s rights campaigns and an environmental movement. However, in a narrow sense as well as from a historical perspective, the term weiquan movement only refers to the rights campaigns that emerged after the Sun Zhigang incident in 2003 (Zhu Han 2016, pp. 55, 60). The Sun Zhigang incident not only marks the beginning of the rights defense movement; it also can be seen as one of its few successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual Report 2019
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–743 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Co-chair Chair JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TOM COTTON, Arkansas THOMAS SUOZZI, New York STEVE DAINES, Montana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey TODD YOUNG, Indiana BEN MCADAMS, Utah DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon BRIAN MAST, Florida GARY PETERS, Michigan VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed JONATHAN STIVERS, Staff Director PETER MATTIS, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT C O N T E N T S Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • Gagging the Lawyers: China’S Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyers and Implica- Tions for U.S.-China Relations
    GAGGING THE LAWYERS: CHINA’S CRACKDOWN ON HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERS AND IMPLICA- TIONS FOR U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS HEARING BEFORE THE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 28, 2017 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–342 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:36 Jan 29, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\26342.TXT PAT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Senate House MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Chairman CHRIS SMITH, New Jersey, Cochairman TOM COTTON, Arkansas ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina STEVE DAINES, Montana TRENT FRANKS, Arizona JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois TODD YOUNG, Indiana MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California TIM WALZ, Minnesota JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TED LIEU, California GARY PETERS, Michigan ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Not yet appointed ELYSE B. ANDERSON, Staff Director PAUL B. PROTIC, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 08:36 Jan 29, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 U:\26342.TXT PAT CO N T E N T S STATEMENTS Page Opening Statement of Hon. Christopher Smith, a U.S. Representative From New Jersey; Cochairman, Congressional-Executive Commission on China .... 1 Statement of Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 5, 2017 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 16:24 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 U:\DOCS\26811 DIEDRE 2017 ANNUAL REPORT VerDate Nov 24 2008 16:24 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 U:\DOCS\26811 DIEDRE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 5, 2017 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–811 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 16:24 Oct 04, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\DOCS\26811 DIEDRE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Senate House MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma Cochairman TOM COTTON, Arkansas ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina STEVE DAINES, Montana TRENT FRANKS, Arizona TODD YOUNG, Indiana RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TIMOTHY J. WALZ, Minnesota GARY PETERS, Michigan TED LIEU, California ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed ELYSE B.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Context Following the Events in the Middle East
    CHINA OBSERVATORY FOR thE PROTEctiON OF humAN Rights DEFENDERS ANNUAL REPORT 2011 In China, human rights activities and fundamental freedoms remained severely restricted throughout 2010 and 2011. In addition, the Chinese authorities increased their repression against any form of dissent in response to anonymous online calls for a “Jasmine Revolution” that started in February 2011 following the events in the Middle East and North Africa. In that context, human rights defenders, including the signatories of “Charter 08”, human rights lawyers as well as defenders working on HIV/AIDS, who denounced forced evictions, corruption and who questioned the Government’s role in various scandals, continued to be subjected to various acts of harassment and intimidation, including arbitrary detention and enforced disappear- ance. The authorities also continued to crackdown on defenders and restrict freedoms of expression, assembly and association on the eve of key sensitive anniversaries and events, such as the Shanghai World Expo 2010. IA S Political context A Following the events in the Middle East and North Africa in early 2011, Chinese authorities became increasingly concerned that the revolutions may have a spill-over effect in China as well. Their reactions especially intensified after an anonymous call online on February 19, 2011, urging people to start a “Jasmine Revolution-style uprising”, similar to those in Tunisia and Egypt. The online post urges protestors to chant slogans on February 20, 2011, in several cities across China. Although faced with a massive response from the police, another online post called on people to march peacefully on February 27 to certain central or symbolic places.
    [Show full text]
  • Advance Questions to China (First Batch) Uruguay
    ADVANCE QUESTIONS TO CHINA (FIRST BATCH) URUGUAY • Uruguay would like to know about what efforts have been made in the last years to ensure human rights defenders, journalists and other civil society actors can carry out their work in a safe environment without fear of reprisals. UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND • When will the Government implement the recommendations made by the UN Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination regarding Xinjiang Autonomous Uyghur Region, including to: halt the practice of detaining individuals who have not been lawfully charged, tried, and convicted for a criminal offence in any extra-legal detention facilities; immediately release individuals detained under these circumstances; eliminate travel restrictions that disproportionately affect members of ethnic minorities; and provide statistics on the numbers of those held involuntarily in the past 5 years? • What steps is the Government taking to ensure that freedom of religion or belief, freedom of movement, and cultural rights are respected and protected for all religious and ethnic groups in China, particularly those in Tibet? • What steps is the Government taking to ensure that lawyers, activists, journalists and human rights defenders including Wang Quanzhang, Yu Wensheng, Jiang Tianyong, Li Yuhan, Gao Zhisheng, Tashi Wangchuk, Ilham Tohti, Wu Gan and Huang Qi are protected from harassment, mistreatment and discrimination, and that those detained for merely exercising their constitutional rights are released without delay?
    [Show full text]
  • China COI Compilation-March 2014
    China COI Compilation March 2014 ACCORD is co-funded by the European Refugee Fund, UNHCR and the Ministry of the Interior, Austria. Commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author. ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation China COI Compilation March 2014 This COI compilation does not cover the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, nor does it cover Taiwan. The decision to exclude Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan was made on the basis of practical considerations; no inferences should be drawn from this decision regarding the status of Hong Kong, Macau or Taiwan. This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared on the basis of publicly available information, studies and commentaries within a specified time frame. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Republic of China the Olympics Countdown
    China: The Olympics Countdown 1 People’s Republic of China The Olympics countdown – crackdown on activists threatens Olympics legacy Introduction With little more than four months to go before the Beijing Olympics, few substantial reforms have been introduced that will have a significant, positive impact on human rights in China.1 This is particularly apparent in the plight of individual activists and journalists, who have bravely sought to expose ongoing human rights abuses and call on the government to address them. Recent measures taken by the authorities to detain, prosecute and imprison those who raise human rights concerns suggest that, to date, the Olympic Games has failed to act as a catalyst for reform. Unless the Chinese authorities take steps to redress the situation urgently, a positive human rights legacy for the Beijing Olympics looks increasingly beyond reach. It is increasingly clear that much of the current wave of repression is occurring not in spite of the Olympics, but actually because of the Olympics. Peaceful human rights activists, and others who have publicly criticised official government policy, have been targeted in the official pre-Olympics ‘clean up’, in an apparent attempt to portray a ‘stable’ or ‘harmonious’ image to the world by August 2008. Recent official assertions of a ‘terrorist’ plot to attack the Olympic Games have given prominence to potential security threats to the Olympics, but a failure to back up such assertions with concrete evidence increases suspicions that the authorities are overstating such threats in an attempt to justify the current crackdown. Several peaceful activists, including those profiled in this series of reports, remain imprisoned or held under tight police surveillance.
    [Show full text]
  • China Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group (CHRLCG) 中國維權律師關注組 3/F, 6 Portland Street, Yaumatei, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    China Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group (CHRLCG) 中國維權律師關注組 3/F, 6 Portland Street, Yaumatei, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Tel: (852) 23881377, Fax: (852) 23887270 Email: [email protected] Website: www.chrlcg-hk.org An NGO Submission to the UN Committee Against Torture for the 41st session for the Fourth and Fifth Periodic Reports of the People's Republic of China on the Implementation of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment October 2008 1. The China Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group (CHRLCG) is a non-profit organization based in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). Its objective is to advocate for the protection of the human rights lawyers and legal rights defenders in China. It was established on 20 January 2007 by a group of lawyers, legislators and academics in Hong Kong. Despite their endeavours to fight for the rights of the underprivileged within the legal framework, many lawyers and legal activists in China have been subjected to tremendous political pressure and unfair treatment by the Chinese authorities. They and their families deserve more attention and support from Hong Kong and the international community. We believe that the status and rights of these lawyers must be respected before China can successfully develop constitutionalism and the rule of law. 2. Although the State party ratified the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (the Convention) on 4 October 1988, dissidents and human rights defenders continued to be subjected to various forms of torture. In addition to the State party’s failure to effectively implement all the relevant provisions on torture in domestic laws, law enforcement officers are usually the ones who violate the domestic laws and the international convention.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping's
    Promoting human rights & empowering grassroots activism in China A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping’s “Chinese Dream” 2013 Annual Report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders in China March 2014 Web: www.chrdnet.com • Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 1 Crackdown on Liberties That Are Fundamental to Civil Society 4 Judicial Authorities Lend a Hand in Reining in Online Speech & Media 7 Bold Reprisals & Violence Against Human Rights Lawyers 10 Reprisals Against Activists Seeking Participation 12 in UN Human Rights Reviews New Leaders Follow Old Patterns 14 Recommendations 15 Notes 17 Index of Chinese Human Rights Defenders Whose Cases CHRD 25 Reported or Documented in 2013 Cover: Chinese citizens inspired by the “New Citizens’ Movement” () took to the streets in 2013 to rally for anti-corruption measures, calling on top government officials to disclose their personal wealth. “2013 saw the harshest suppression of civil society in over a decade…with human rights and rule of law basically going backwards. Still, the drive in Chinese civil society to keep fighting under difficult and dangerous conditions is the most important asset for promoting human rights and democratization in the country.” - Teng Biao, Chinese human rights lawyer Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 Human rights defenders in China experienced a tumultuous year of government suppression, yet they continued to demonstrate remarkable strength and extraordinary courage.1 In interviews and discussions conducted by Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD), dozens of Chinese activists describe 2013 as the worst year for human rights since at least 2008, which saw severe crackdowns on civil liberties around the Beijing Olympics and with the Charter 08 campaign for reform.
    [Show full text]
  • As Prepared for Delivery. Good Afternoon. This Is a Hearing of The
    Statement of U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, Chairman of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) CECC Hearing on “Gagging the Lawyers: China’s Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyers and Its Implications for U.S.- China Relations” Wednesday, June 28, 2017 As prepared for delivery. Good afternoon. This is a hearing of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China. The title of this hearing is “Gagging the Lawyers: China’s Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyers and Its Implications for U.S.-China Relations.” We will have one panel testifying today. The panel will feature: Terence Halliday: Co-director of the Center on Law & Globalization at the American Bar Foundation, and Co-author of the book Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work; Teng Biao: Chinese human rights lawyer; Visiting Scholar at the Institute for Advanced Study; and Co-founder of the Open Constitution Initiative and China Human Rights Accountability Center; Xia Chongyu: Son of imprisoned human rights lawyer Xia Lin (pronounced SHAH LIN) and student at Liberty University; and Li Xiaorong: independent scholar; formerly with the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy at the University of Maryland. Thank you all for being here. Before we move to the topic at hand I want to take a moment to acknowledge the news this week regarding the reported transfer of 2010 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo from prison to a hospital for treatment of late- stage liver cancer. This should not be confused with an act of mercy on the part of the Chinese government. His 8 years of imprisonment—due to his eloquent appeals for non-violent political reform and protection of basic rights—remain a travesty of justice and a stain on China's rights record.
    [Show full text]
  • (709) Crackdown: the Future of Human Rights Lawyering
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 41, Issue 5 2018 Article 3 After the July 9 (709) Crackdown: The Future of Human Rights Lawyering Hualing Fu∗ Han Zhuy ∗ y Copyright c 2018 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj ARTICLE AFTER THE JULY 9 (709) CRACKDOWN: THE FUTURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING Hualing Fu & Han Zhu* I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................1135 II. TRIVIALITY ...............................................................1138 III. COOPTATION .............................................................1146 IV. RESILIENCE ...............................................................1156 V. CONCLUSION ............................................................1163 I. INTRODUCTION Eighteen months after the 709 crackdown on human rights lawyers,1 a debate took place within China’s human rights lawyers’ communities. 2 It is a brief, yet passionate and provocative debate focusing on some of the fundamental questions about law’s limits in seeking justice and protecting rights in an authoritarian state and the limited role of lawyers in their endeavour. Having grown for about twenty years since the mid-1990s, human rights lawyers have engaged in social-legal activism in wide policy areas including consumer protection, anti-discrimination, rights in the criminal process, and the * Faculty of law, The University of Hong Kong. This research was supported by a grant from the RGC General Research Fund (HKU17613515). 1. For a critical analysis of the crackdown, see Fu Hualing, The July 9th (709) Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyers: Legal Advocacy in an Authoritarian State, J. OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA (forthcoming, 2018). 2. See, e.g., Chen Jiangang, Zhang Sizhi Lun [Thoughts on Zhang Sizhi] (Nov. 15, 2016), http://www.mychinese.news/2016/11/blog-post_16.html [https://perma.cc/EV4C-88JY]; Yan Wenxin, Zaitan Gean Tuidong Fazhi [Rethink About Promoting Rule of Law Through Individual Cases, WALL OUTSIDE (Dec.
    [Show full text]