Annual Report 1 April 2005 €“ 31 March 2006 Working Todayfor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 1 April 2005 €“ 31 March 2006 Working Todayfor Annual Report 1 April 2005 – 31 March 2006 working today HC 1410 for nature tomorrow English Nature Annual Report and Accounts 2005/2006 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State and Comptroller and Auditor General, in pursuance of Schedule 6, Sections 20 (1) and 21 (3) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 July 2005 HC 1410 LONDON: The Stationery Office Contents Foreword from the Chair 2 Introduction and Chief Executive’s Statement 4 Protecting the very best 7 From species to landscapes 25 People and nature 35 Policy advice for sustainability 43 Science, information and knowledge 57 Managing English Nature 65 Summary of achievement 68 Council Members 77 Financial Summary 80 Companies Act Disclosures 82 Remuneration report 85 Statement of Council's and Chief Executive's responsibilities 89 Statement on Internal Control 90 The Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General 94 Statement 1 Income and Expenditure Account 96 2 Statement of total recognised gains and losses 97 3 Balance sheet 98 4 Cash flow statement 99 Notes to financial statements 100 More information about our work, including statistics on subjects in this report can be found on our website. www.english-nature.org.uk 1 Foreword As Acting Chair since November Department and others has been 2005, I am privileged to present measured and based on sound the last full Annual Report of judgement. English Nature owes English Nature, before we him a huge debt of gratitude. formally join Natural England in October 2006. Together with colleagues from the Countryside Agency and Rural My predecessor, Sir Martin Development Service, our Council Doughty, made an immense has also played a crucial and very contribution to English Nature. active role in shaping Natural During his period at the helm, the England, both through the organisation enjoyed consistently legislation and the development of strong development and excellent the organisation’s strategy and first external relations. Sir Martin corporate plan. worked tirelessly to ensure that Natural England will be a fitting Our solid progress towards the successor for English Nature and we Government’s Public Service warmly congratulate him on his Agreement target of having 95 per appointment as the Chair of the new cent of the SSSI area in favourable organisation – it is in good hands. or recovering condition by 2010 is evidence of a very successful year. This is also my formal chance to On 31 March our progress was on thank all our staff for another track at 72.3 per cent. This successful year and for their outstanding achievement was only outstanding contributions that have possible with the support of our made English Nature the partners – all those organisations, organisation of which we are so landowners and individuals with proud. I would particularly like to whom we enjoy such productive acknowledge Andy Brown, our co-operation. I particularly thank Chief Executive, for his our increasing band of volunteers enthusiastic and determined (now numbering 1,865) for their leadership. His guidance to me hard work, goodwill and and my Council has always been enthusiasm. They will be a great wise, and his advice to the asset to Natural England. 2 English Nature has continued to with our media partners, we have advise Government on helped to spread the word through environmental policy – on subjects initiatives such as Breathing Places ranging from avian influenza to and SpringWatch. Since Natural climate change, wind power to England’s brief includes promoting badgers (and bovine TB) and countryside access and recreation, sustainable housing, to the future projects such as these will of the CEH research stations. We undoubtedly increase. helped draft Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 9: biodiversity So, what does the future hold? In and geological conservation, which 1959, the Nature Conservancy represents a significant policy asked: “Will wild nature be once advance for conservation, more a partner, understood and reinforcing the need to integrate valued by all, or become a mere biodiversity and geodiversity in all doormat worn down to planning considerations. shabbiness?” As we prepare to pass the baton to Natural England, To support our advisory role we I believe nature conservation in lead a wide range of research England is moving firmly in the projects such as the multi-partner right direction. Wildlife is valued Monarch project that models how by millions of people, but wildlife might respond to climate increasingly we are realising the change in Britain and Ireland over additional social and economic the next 50 years. One of this benefits that a healthy environment year’s research reports, Long-term can provide. Whilst our terrestrial change in woodland vegetation protected areas are being brought 1971–2001 (ENRR 653) back to favourable condition, there documents changes in British remains a huge task to rebuild woodlands and highlights how nature across our towns, factors such as diffuse pollution countryside, coasts and seas! This and climate change have affected is an urgent task if nature is to our habitats and wildlife. adapt to climate change – which is Maintaining such long-term studies why the creation of a strong remains crucially important. Natural England is so important. English Nature has given increasing focus to enthusing people about wildlife and helping them to engage with the natural world. A greater appreciation of nature through healthy activity will benefit everybody and, together Mike Moser Chair 3 Annual Report 1 April 2005 – 31 March 2006 Introduction and Chief Executive’s Statement Welcome to this, the last Annual recovering condition by 2010, we Report and Accounts of English set ourselves a year-end target of Nature before the transition to 72%. The fact that we have Natural England in October 2006. exceeded this figure is a testament The first part of the report outlines to the hard work of our staff and our aims and achievements in the that of many landowners and past year, while the remainder managers. We offer them our details English Nature’s income profuse thanks. and expenditure, together with related information. Each element As well as SSSIs, the work to of the Report and Accounts has improve our National Nature been signed off by me, in my role Reserves also continues to deliver as Chief Executive and Accounting results, with 86.4% of reserve area Officer for English Nature. now in favourable or recovering condition. Our voluntary staff A great deal has happened in the have played a vital part in this past year, and the achievements of achievement and their efforts in English Nature’s staff are all the this, and in many other areas of more noteworthy for being English Nature’s work, are much accomplished against the appreciated. background of preparation for Natural England. The fact that we Positive results have also been have managed to meet, and in achieved for the BAP priority many cases exceed, the vast species and habitats that English majority of our corporate targets Nature leads on. Of these, 8 of the while undertaking these extra 15 habitats and 43 of the 88 duties is a cause for celebration. species are now stable or increasing, these numbers One of our most important long- representing a very significant term objectives is to assist the improvement on those of the last Government in achieving its PSA reporting round in 2002. Species target for SSSIs. In meeting the showing an improvement in their overall target of having 95% of population trend include the SSSI area in favourable or greater horseshoe bat, Cornish 4 path moss, the ladybird spider and We have had a busy year providing the pool frog; the latter having advice to help align policies so been reintroduced to Norfolk this they contribute to achieving year after its UK extinction in the sustainability. We responded to 1990s. As well as our terrestrial well over 100 national and regional and freshwater habitats, our consultations and provided knowledge of our maritime BAP evidence to many Parliamentary habitats continues to grow, with Committees. Of particular note trends now known for 5 out of 6 of during the year was the the maritime habitats we lead on, a announcement of the Catchment reverse of the situation last year. Sensitive Farming programme, to be delivered jointly with the Our work to promote conservation Environment Agency. in the wider countryside has also seen significant developments. As this is my last year as Chief One of these was the start of the Executive of English Nature I Countdown 2010 Biodiversity would like to record my thanks to Action Fund, a grant-scheme that I all those volunteers and partners had the honour of launching at the who have contributed so much to World Conservation Union’s UK nature conservation over many committee meeting in December. years. Without their support and The Defra-funded scheme is being efforts, England’s natural heritage administered by English Nature would be much the poorer. My job and it will help support many as Chief Executive has been voluntary conservation enormously stimulating and organisations in their efforts to enjoyable because of the conserve species and habitats friendships and partnerships with around the country. so many people and organisations, and the expertise and dedication of This year also saw the publication Council Members and staff. It has of Geological conservation: a been a privilege to have served as guide to good practice. Illustrated Chief Executive of such a with numerous case-studies, this wonderful organisation. publication shares good practise developed by English Nature and its partners over the last 15 years. The guide is certain to become required reading for those with an interest in geological conservation and it has already attracted fulsome praise from many quarters.
Recommended publications
  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)
    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.9.17 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(Q)
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Consultation Report Appendix 9.17 Norfolk Boreas Onshore Ecology and Ornithology outgoing documents Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 5.1.9.17 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(q) Date: June 2019 Revision: Version 1 Author: Copper Consultancy Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm This page is intentionally blank. Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendices Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment Onshore Ecology and Ornithology Method Statement Document Reference: PB5640-004-005 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Date: January 2018 Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Ltd Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 10/11/2017 01D Internal draft for review GC DT AD 13/11/2017 02D Second Draft GC DT 20/11/2017 03D Draft provided to Vattenfall for review GC DT JL 19/02/2018 01F Issue to consultees GC CD JL 30/01/2018 02F Removed reference to agreement on odonata GC CD CD surveys in section 1.2.3. This method statement has been prepared by Royal HaskoningDHV on behalf of Norfolk Boreas Limited in order to build upon the information provided within the Norfolk Boreas Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Scoping Report. It has been produced following a full review of the Scoping Opinion provided by the Planning Inspectorate. All content and material within this document is draft for stakeholder consultation purposes, within the Evidence Plan Process. Many participants of the Norfolk Boreas Evidence Plan Process will also have participated in the Norfolk Vanguard Evidence Plan Process. This document is presented as a complete standalone document however in order to maximise resource and save duplication of effort, the main areas of deviation from what has already been presented through the Norfolk Vanguard Evidence Plan Process and PEIR or in the Norfolk Boreas Scoping Report are presented in orange text throughout this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for National Nature Reserves
    Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England www.gov.uk/naturalACCOUNTING FOR-england NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Natural England Research Report NERR078 Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A Natural Capital Account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England Tim Sunderland1, Ruth Waters1, Dan Marsh2, Cat Hudson1 and Jane Lusardi1 Published 21st February 2019 1 Natural England 2 University of Waikato, New Zealand This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-518-6 © Natural England 2018 ACCOUNTING FOR NATIONAL NATURE RESERVES Project details This report should be cited as: SUNDERLAND, T., WATERS, R.D., MARSH, D. V. K., HUDSON, C., AND LUSARDI, J. (2018). Accounting for National Nature Reserves: A natural capital account of the National Nature Reserves managed by Natural England. Natural England Research Report, Number 078 Project manager Tim Sunderland Principal Specialist in Economics Horizon House Bristol BS1 5TL [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who contributed to this report both within Natural England and externally. ii Natural England Research Report 078 Foreword England’s National Nature Reserves (NNRs) are the crown jewels of our natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan This Determination Statement
    24 August 2021 Strategic Environmental Assessment Determination Statement: Draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan This determination statement has been produced by Fenland District Council (FDC) as “responsible authority”, to meet the requirements of Regulation 9 of the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004. This Determination Statement forms a Submission Document for the purposes of neighbourhood planning, as required by The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) (reg. 15(e)(ii)). A Screening Assessment was undertaken by FDC during the preparation of the draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan. As part of this assessment, FDC consulted the statutory bodies. The SEA Screening Report follows this Determination Statement. The Screening Report examines the strategic policy and environmental context relevant to Whittlesey, and presents the findings of the screening assessment. The report identifies that the draft Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan does not seek to increase the overall quantum of growth beyond that which has already been permitted through the planning system. Other policies generally accord with the adopted Local Plan, the potential environmental effects of which were duly assessed through the plan-making process. The Screening Report was sent to consultation bodies for comment (13 July to 23 August 2021). Responses were received from Environment Agency, Historic England and Natural England. Through its response to the draft Screening Report consultation, Historic England concurred with the Council that the preparation of a Strategic Environmental Assessment is not required. Natural England confirmed it agrees with the report’s conclusions that the Whittlesey Neighbourhood Plan would not be likely to result in a significant effect on any European Site, either alone or in combination and therefore no further assessment work is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Minerals and Waste Development Framework Sustainability Appraisal & Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report February 2011
    Somerset Minerals Plan Preferred Options Paper Sustainability Appraisal Report Prepared for Somerset County Council by LUC December 2012 Project Title: Somerset Minerals Plan Preferred Options Paper Sustainability Appraisal Report Client: Somerset County Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Principal 1 05.11.12 First Draft Report Ifan Gwilym Catrin Owen Jeremy Owen Catrin Owen 2 16.11.12 Final Report Ifan Gwilym Catrin Owen Jeremy Owen Catrin Owen Jeremy Owen 3 14.12.12 Final Report – signed-off Ifan Gwilym Catrin Owen Jeremy Owen version Catrin Owen Jeremy Owen J:\CURRENT PROJECTS\4600s\4629 Somerset Minerals\4629.01\B Project Working\2012 Project restart\SA Report\4629_SomersetMineralsSA_20121116_v3_0.docx Somerset Minerals Plan Preferred Options Paper Sustainability Appraisal Report Prepared for Somerset County Council by LUC December 2012 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 14 Great George Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Bristol BS1 5RH Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management Tel:0117 929 1997 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology Fax:0117 929 1998 London NW1 1JD LUC uses 100% recycled paper Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 Contents 1 Non-Technical Summary 1 2 Introduction 30 3 Somerset Minerals Plan Preferred Options Paper 34 4 Appraisal Methodology 41 5 Environmental, social and economic policy objectives of relevant plans and programmes 45 6 Sustainability Context for
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Ecological Changes in the British Flora WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN How to cite: WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN (2009) Ecological Changes in the British Flora, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/121/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Ecological Changes in the British Flora Kevin John Walker B.Sc., M.Sc. School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences University of Durham 2009 This thesis is submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dedicated to Terry C. E. Wells (1935-2008) With thanks for the help and encouragement so generously given over the last ten years Plate 1 Pulsatilla vulgaris , Barnack Hills and Holes, Northamptonshire Photo: K.J. Walker Contents ii Contents List of tables vi List of figures viii List of plates x Declaration xi Abstract xii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Strategy for Huntingdonshire 2011 - 2016 Contents
    Open Space Strategy for Huntingdonshire 2011 - 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Vision of the Strategy 1 1.3 Aims of the Strategy 2 1.4 Scope 3 2. Context 2.1 District Profile 4 2.2 Community Benefits of Open Spaces 6 2.3 Policy Background 7 2.3.1 National Policy Context 7 2.3.2 Regional Policy Context 8 2.3.3 Local Policy Context 9 3. Consultation 3.1 Community Engagement 11 3.1.1 ‘District Wide’ Survey (2010) 11 3.1.2 Tellus 4 Survey (2010) 11 3.1.3 Sport England’s Active People Survey (2009) 11 3.1.4 Place Survey (2008) 11 3.1.5 PPG 17 Open Space Strategy Household Survey (2006) 12 3.1.6 PPG 17 Open Space Strategy School Information 12 Technology Survey (2006) 3.1.7 Cambridgeshire Quality of Life Survey (2006) 13 3.1.8 Summary 13 4. Audit of Provision 4.1 Overview of Provision 14 4.2 Distribution of Open Space 16 4.3 Limitations of Using the “Primary Purpose” Classification 17 5. Open Space Priorities in Huntingdonshire 5.1 Developing a Priority Matrix 18 5.2 Rationale behind the Priority Matrix Criteria 20 5.2.1 Local Designation 20 5.2.2 Existing Quality 20 5.2.3 Community Involvement 20 5.2.4 Sustainability 20 5.2.5 Potential Improvements 21 5.2.6 Site Usage 21 5.3. Application of the Priority Matrix 21 5.3.1 Background to the District’s Destination Sites 21 5.3.2 Priority Matrix Scores: Destination Sites 23 5.3.3 Wider Use of the Priority Matrix 24 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Minehead to Combe Martin | Habitats Regulation Assessment Contents: Contents:
    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath Assessment of England Coast Path proposals between Minehead and Combe Martin on Exmoor Heaths and Exmoor and Quantock Oakwoods Special Areas of Conservation Version 2.0 Revised and updated: July 2020 1 England Coast Path | Minehead to Combe Martin | Habitats Regulation Assessment Contents: Contents: .......................................................................................................................... 2 Summary .......................................................................................................................... 3 PART A: Introduction and information about the England Coast Path ......................... 7 PART B: Information about the European Sites which could be affected .................. 10 PART C: Screening of the plan or project for appropriate assessment...................... 14 PART D: Appropriate Assessment and Conclusions on Site Integrity........................ 20 PART E: Permission decision with respect to European Sites ................................... 29 References to evidence................................................................................................. 30 Annex 1. Maps .............................................................................................................. 31 2 England Coast Path | Minehead to Combe Martin | Habitats Regulation Assessment Summary I) Introduction This is a record of the Habitats Regulations Assessment (‘HRA’) undertaken by Natural England, on behalf of the Secretary of State in accordance with
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment: Draft Scoping Report
    North Norfolk 2016 - 2036 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Draft Scoping Report May 2017 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan All documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Draft HRA Scoping - North Norfolk District Council – Emerging Local Plan Executive Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, (amended 2012); in order to ensure that plans and projects do not have a likely significant effect on any European designated sites for nature conservation. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an “adverse effect on the integrity of a European site”. Where there is uncertainty over the effects then the competent authority will need to demonstrate how these can be avoided and what mitigation can be put in place. A Local Plan is the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment, which is the responsibility of the plan-making body (in this case North Norfolk District Council) to produce. This scoping report provides the background and review of evidence to support the commencement of screening and the final Habitats Regulations Assessment of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and Site Allocations documents. This report considers: • The European designated sites within and outside the plan area affected. • The characteristics of these sites and their conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    20 NOV 2Q02 I FXCHA^O'-"> 1 Norfolk Bird Report - 2001 Editor: Giles Dunmore Editorial 95 Review of the Year 98 Wetland Bird Surveys for Breydon and The Wash 1 05 Norfolk Bird Atlas 1 07 Systematic List 1 09 Introductions, Escapes, Ferals and Hybrids 248 Earliest and Latest Dates of Summer Migrants 253 Latest and Earliest Dates of Winter Migrants 254 Non-accepted and non-submitted records 255 Contributors 256 Ringing Report 258 Hunstanton Cliffs: a Forgotten Migration Hotspot 268 1 Yellow-legged Gulls in Norfolk: 1 96 -200 1 273 Marmora’s Warbler on Scolt Head - a first for Norfolk 28 Pallas’s Grasshopper Warbler at Blakeney Point - the second for Norfolk 283 Blyth’s Pipit at Happisburgh in September 1 999 - the second for Norfolk 285 Norfolk Mammal Report - 2001 Editor: Ian Keymer Editorial 287 Bats at Paston Great Barn 288 Memories of an ex-editor 298 Harvest Mice: more common than suspected? 299 Are we under-recording the Norfolk mink population? 301 National Key Sites for Water Voles in Norfolk 304 A Guide to identification of Shrews and Rodents 309 Published by NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Castle Museum, Norwich, NRl 3JU (Transactions Volume 35 part 2 October 2002) Please note that the page numbering in this report follows on from part 1 of the Transactions pub- lished in July 2002 ISSN 0375 7226 www.nnns.org.uk Keepsake back numbers are available from David & Iris Pauli, 8 Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT Front cover photograph: Tree Sparrow (Richard Brooks) Back cover photograph: Grey Seal (Graeme Cresswell) NORFOLK BIRD REPORT - 2001 Editorial x On behalf of the Society 1 am pleased to present the annual report on the Birds of Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]