DOCSLIB.ORG

1 9 6 5 Tr Ctions 1 9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1965 TR CTIONS 196 5 A COMPILATION OF PAPERS PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL AT THE NINTH ANNUAL MEETING, APRIL 7-9, 1965, AT THE TJNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS, REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA. Compiled by: JIM YOAKUM and CHARLES G. HANSEN THE DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS ARE PUBLISHED ANNUALLY AND ARE AVAILABLE BY WRITING THE "Desert Bighorn Council" 1500 North Decatur Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89109 COVER DRAWING BY PAT HANSEM NINTH ANNUAL MEETING April 6,7,8, 1965 Redlands,California Council Award ............................... ...111 In Memoriam ................................ I v Annual Field Trip. ............................. v Roster ................................... v i PAPERS PRESENTED SUMMARY OF DISTINCTIVE BIGHORN SHEEP OBSERVED - - -- - QN-TH EDESERT-G-AME-RAN E, NEV=ADA---=---- - - --- - - -- Charles G . Hansen ......................... 6 MANAGEMENT UNITS AND BIGHORN SHEEP HERDS ON THE DESERT GAME RANGE, NEVADA Charles G . Hansen . e. ....................... 11 A PRELIMINARY RECONNAISSANCE AND EVALUATION OF THE WILDLIFE IN THE PINACATE REGION, SONORA, MEXICO John P. Russo ............................. 15 EXOTIC BIG GAME ON PUBLIC LANDS Frank C . Craighead, Jr . Raymond F. Dasmann ........................ 19 STATUS OF BIGHORN IN THE RIVER MOUNTAINS OF LAI<E MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Alan Denniston ........................... 27 A RECONNAISSANCE OF SIERRA BIGHORN AND BIGHORN RANGES IN THE SIERRA NEVADA Richard Riegelhuth. ......................... 35 A HISTORY OF THE BIGHORN IN CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA Reginald H .Barrett ......................... 40 PROGRESS REPORT ON JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL MONUMENT BIGHORN RESEARCH Ralph E. Welles ........................... 49 A BIGHORN SHEEP HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Edward R. Schneegas ........................ 53 GROUP MORTALITY IN THE BIGHORN SHEEP Gale Monson ............................ 55 A STUDY OF THE BLACKBRUSH PLANT COMMUNITY ON THE DESERT GAME RANGE: I W. Glen Bradley .......................... 56 PRELIMINARY REPORT ON 90 SR LEVELS IN HOCK JOINTS OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP AND MULE DEER R. C. Kramp, B.. S. ......................... 62 METHODS OF POST MORTEM DESCRIPTION OF WILDLIFE RUMINANTS WITH TWO COMMONLY OBSERVED LESIONS IN THE DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP Ronald E. Engel, D .V .M., Ph .D .................. 68 SKULL MEASUREMENTS OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP FROM THE DESERT GAME RANGE NECROSIS AND ANOMALIES OF THE SKULL IN DESERT BIGHORN SH EEP e Glen Allred. ............a. .............. W. Glen Bradley .......................... 75 BIGHORN HUNTING PROPOSALS Steve James, Jr. ........................... 82 1964 - 1965 PROGRESS 4ND HUNT REPORT - NEVADA Raymond A. Brechbill ........................ 84 COMPETITION BETWEEN DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP AND FERAL BURROS FOR FORAGE IN THE DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL MONUMENT Kenneth P. St.John, Jr. ....................... 89 ' The 1964 Desert Bighorn Council Awards Committee chose Mr. John P. Russo as recipient of the Council Award. This award is presented for outstanding contributions toward the welfare of the Desert Bighorn Sheep in the United States and Mexico. OLD JOE had many names during his long life at the Corn Creek Field Station of the Desert Game Range, Las Vegas, Nevada. It is not known who named him Joe but this name stuck with him through the years although for various reasons he was known as the Old Man, Old Nasty and Old Joe. Young Joe was brought to Corn Creek at about six months of age in the fall of 1948. He was the fifth Desert Bighorn Sheep captured on the Desert Game Range and placed in captivity. Two rams and a ewe were taken in 1947 and another ewe and Joe were brought in during 1948. The two were placed on loan to the San Diego Zoo while the two ewes and Joe were kept on the Desert Game Range. One of these ewes died at two years but the remaining ewe and Joe survived and the Corn Creek bighorn sheep herd was on its way. Joe sired 11 of the sheep born at Corn Creek and has at least 3 "grand-lambs" still living there. He has several more "grand-lambs" that survive him in the San Diego 230 branch of the "family". Old Joe had many friends from all walks of life. Many local residence came once or twice a year to Corn Creek just to see him, to feed him grass and leaves through the fence. This latter in spite of the warning to stay back from the fence since Old Joe was inclined to butt the fence behind almost any unsuspecting human. Old Joe had friends across the nation from the east coast to the Pacific, He gained national recognition as the "Old Man" when his antics were written about and his photographs were published in the book, "The Bighorn of Death Valley" by Ralph and Florence Welles. Many of his friends remember him as Old Nasty because of his seemingly unpredictible behavior of expecting people to act as sheep and play the vigorous and rough butting games with him. Further national publicity was received when he was operated on in 1963 in order to save his life. He did succeed in living for another two years and dies at the age of 16 years and 10 months. He passed away easily in his sleep in the early morning of January 16, 1965. With his passing his grandson, "Little Joe" became "Joe" so that in the years to come there will again be an OLD JOE in the Corn Creek bighorn herd. FIELD TRIPS DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL MEETING Richard Weaver lifornia Department of Fish and Game Niland, California Santa Rosa Mountains: Tuesday, April 6, 1965 A group of the Desert Bighorn Council assembled at the Desert Magazine Building in Palm Desert, California. The group then drove up the Pines to Palms Highway (state route 74) stopping once at a location where sheep are often observed. At this point, the group was able to look down on the University of California research facility located in Deep Canyon. The group took a down hill hike from about 3,000 feet to 1,000 feet, largely in the Grapevine Canyon drainage and over the Dead Indian escarpment. This is an area of heavy sheep utilization. Sheep were observed. After lunch at College of Desfrt Cafeteria, the group dispersed. Lloyd Tevis took a group to see the University of California facilities in Deep Canyon. Another group went to a spring in Carrizo Canyon where plans were being made to mark sheep. -San .-. -.Gabriel -.- - - -- Mountains:.- - -- Thursday, April 9, 1965 Desert Gighorn Council members proving they are a hardy lot assembled for a hike in the rain at Bonita Camp. The U.S. Forest Service personnel led the group into the south fork of Lytle Creek. In all, 21 sheep were observed by members of this group making getting wet worthwhile. This is a unique habitat, totally different from that which most Desert Bighorn occupy. There is a year-round strea~nin the bottom of the canyon with associated riparian growth. The canyon walls are chaparral covered with open slide and scree draws ROSTER DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL MEETING April , 1965 A1 1red, Glenn Biology Department Las Vegas, Nevada University of Nevada Atwood, Leon A. Gray1ing C.reek Ranch West Yellowstone, Montana Baker, Lee Bi 01 ogy Department, Las Vegas, Nevada University of Nevada Bernard, Jack Graduate Student Arcata, California Humboldt State College Blaisdell , Jim Crand Canyon National Grand Canyon, Park Arizona Blong , Bonnar California Dept. of Idyllwild, Californa Fish & Game Bradley, W. Glen Biology Department Las Vegas, Nevada University of Nevada Brechbill , Ray 3769 E. Wyoming Las Vegas, Nevada Broman, Stanley E. National Park Service Santa Fe, New Mexico Box 728 Brown, Dave 2009 E. 2nd - St. Tucson, Arizona Broyles, Rothwell P. National Park Service 29 Palms, California Joshua Tree National Monument Cater, Baine H. Bureau of Sport Fisheries Las Vegas, Nevada & Wildlife - - - -- Chew, Dennis W. Red1and~ , Cal i forni a Clare, Dr. C. G. 7134 N. 13th St. Phoenix , Arizona Collins, Ross M. 1026 S. Fleetwell W. Covins, California Crow, Lloyd Z. 499 Arrow Hwy. Up1 and, Cal ifornia Dasmann, Wi11 i am U.S. Forest Service San Francisco, 630 Sansome St. California Denniston, Alan E. National Park Service Boulder City, Nevada Box 662 Doman, Everett R. U.S. Forest Service San Francisco, 630 Sansome St. California Essex, David Joshua Tree National 29 Palms, California Monument Fulwider, Derrel S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California 800 Truxtun Garcia, Rami ro Of. Forestal y Fauna Maxicali, B.C. Mecixo Graf, William Department of Biology San Jose, California San Jose State College Graham, Hatch San Bernardi no National San Bernardi no, Forest California Green, Ed California Dept. of Escondido, California Fish & Game 856 W. Grand Greer, Jack M. Templeton, California 1965 Bighorn Sheep Council Roz Hansen, Charles G. Biologist, U.S. Fish & Las Vegas, Nevada Wild1ife Service Star Route 1, Box 14 Hein, Ronald F. California Dept. of Chino, California Fish & Game 5252 Francis Ave. Hi ppl y , David Arizona Game & Fish Dept. Buckey , Arizona James, Jr. Steve Fraternity of the Desert N. Las Vegas , Bighorn Nevada 2521 Ellis Kelly, Warren E. Post Engineers, Hunter Jolon, California Liggett Military Reservation Kennedy, Cecil A. Fish & Wildlife Service Las Cruces , New Mexico Box 156 Kennedy, William A. Bureau of Land Management Riverside, California 1414 - 8th St. Lard, Claude F. Bureau of Sport Fisheries Yuma , Arizona and Wildlife Light, Jerome T. Cleveland National Forest San Diego, California 11 96 Broadway Lively, John H. U.S. Forest Service Idyllwild, California Macgregor, Wal ly Dept. of Fish & Game Sacramento, California 10th & 0 St. Monson, Gale Bureau of Sport Fisheries & Wildlife Moser, Clifford A. Fish & Game Dept. Boulder, Colorado 3200 Dartmouth Ave. McClain, Hall H. Bureau of Land Management Riverside, California P.O. Box 723 McIntosh, Don Bureau of Land Management Reno, Nevada 300 Booth St. McKnight, Tom Dept. of Geography Los Angeles, University of Cal if. California Nelson, Marcus C. Bureau of Sport Fisheries A1 buquerque, and Wildlife New Mexico Newell, Kent V. Bureau of Land Riverside, California Management Nord, Eamor C. U.S. Forest Service Riverside, California Forest Fire Lab., P.D.
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
  • Tectonic Influences on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Walker Lane: an Incipient Transform Fault Along the Evolving Pacific – North American Plate Boundary

    Tectonic Influences on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Walker Lane: an Incipient Transform Fault Along the Evolving Pacific – North American Plate Boundary

    Arizona Geological Society Digest 22 2008 Tectonic influences on the spatial and temporal evolution of the Walker Lane: An incipient transform fault along the evolving Pacific – North American plate boundary James E. Faulds and Christopher D. Henry Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA ABSTRACT Since ~30 Ma, western North America has been evolving from an Andean type mar- gin to a dextral transform boundary. Transform growth has been marked by retreat of magmatic arcs, gravitational collapse of orogenic highlands, and periodic inland steps of the San Andreas fault system. In the western Great Basin, a system of dextral faults, known as the Walker Lane (WL) in the north and eastern California shear zone (ECSZ) in the south, currently accommodates ~20% of the Pacific – North America dextral motion. In contrast to the continuous 1100-km-long San Andreas system, discontinuous dextral faults with relatively short lengths (<10-250 km) characterize the WL-ECSZ. Cumulative dextral displacement across the WL-ECSZ generally decreases northward from ≥60 km in southern and east-central California, to ~25 km in northwest Nevada, to negligible in northeast California. GPS geodetic strain rates average ~10 mm/yr across the WL-ECSZ in the western Great Basin but are much less in the eastern WL near Las Vegas (<2 mm/ yr) and along the northwest terminus in northeast California (~2.5 mm/yr). The spatial and temporal evolution of the WL-ECSZ is closely linked to major plate boundary events along the San Andreas fault system. For example, the early Miocene elimination of microplates along the southern California coast, southward steps in the Rivera triple junction at 19-16 Ma and 13 Ma, and an increase in relative plate motions ~12 Ma collectively induced the first major episode of deformation in the WL-ECSZ, which began ~13 Ma along the N60°W-trending Las Vegas Valley shear zone.
  • Moüjmtaiim Operations

    Moüjmtaiim Operations

    L f\f¿ áfó b^i,. ‘<& t¿ ytn) ¿L0d àw 1 /1 ^ / / /This publication contains copyright material. *FM 90-6 FieW Manual HEADQUARTERS No We DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 30 June 1980 MOÜJMTAIIM OPERATIONS PREFACE he purpose of this rUanual is to describe how US Army forces fight in mountain regions. Conditions will be encountered in mountains that have a significant effect on. military operations. Mountain operations require, among other things^ special equipment, special training and acclimatization, and a high decree of self-discipline if operations are to succeed. Mountains of military significance are generally characterized by rugged compartmented terrain witn\steep slopes and few natural or manmade lines of communication. Weather in these mountains is seasonal and reaches across the entireSspectrum from extreme cold, with ice and snow in most regions during me winter, to extreme heat in some regions during the summer. AlthoughNthese extremes of weather are important planning considerations, the variability of weather over a short period of time—and from locality to locahty within the confines of a small area—also significantly influences tactical operations. Historically, the focal point of mountain operations has been the battle to control the heights. Changes in weaponry and equipment have not altered this fact. In all but the most extreme conditions of terrain and weather, infantry, with its light equipment and mobility, remains the basic maneuver force in the mountains. With proper equipment and training, it is ideally suited for fighting the close-in battfe commonly associated with mountain warfare. Mechanized infantry can\also enter the mountain battle, but it must be prepared to dismount and conduct operations on foot.
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist

    Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist

    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation

    HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation

    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
  • EST. S 1987 Wildlife Systems, Inc

    EST. S 1987 Wildlife Systems, Inc

    EST. s 1987 Wildlife Systems, Inc. was founded in 1987 with a primary focus of providing a dual blend of hunting services for sportsmen seeking quality outdoor adventure, as well as providing landowners with wildlife management services, and this enterprise concept remains the same today. WSI has worked across most regions of Texas, several other states, and multiple foreign countries, and the company's ability to provide adaptive services is one of the unique features that have allowed WSI to successfully integrate into various settings, regardless of the region or resources of interest. WSI currently operates hunting programs on approximately 700,000 acres of private land, offering hunting services for a variety of game species, and hosts hunts each year for clients from over 30 states. Wildlife consulting is provided on numerous other properties which are not enrolled under a WSI hunting program. The growth and continued success of WSI is a direct funtion of a support staff who share in similar operational philosophies developed through company training protocols, striving to offer consistent quality service to our hunters and landowners. From office personnel to guides, cooks to field techs, part-time, fulltime, and seasonal, this group of 30-40 staffers represent the heartbeat of WSI. The quality of their work has been featured in many national and regional magazines, several major television networks, and have received various recognitions including being named the 2002 Dodge Outfitter of the Year, from a cast of over 400 different hunting operations in North America. Company founder and owner, Greg Simons, is a respected wildlife biologist who has been active in his professional peer field for many years, serving as an officer in Texas Chapter of The Wildlife Society and Texas Wildlife Associa­ tion.
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV0S010-2009-1014-EA May 2016 Eastern Nevada Transmission Project APPLICANT Silver State Energy Association GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086357 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Background ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action .........................................................................................2 1.4 Decisions to be Made .....................................................................................................7 1.5 BLM Policies, Plans, Authorizing Actions, and Permit Requirements .........................7 Chapter 2 - Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Regulatory Framework for Alternatives
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
  • Backcountry Discovery Trail

    Backcountry Discovery Trail

    Have you ever wanted to get into the backcountry Backcountry of a National Forest? Have you wondered if you have Discovery Trail what it takes? Rest assured: exploring the backcountry doesn’t necessarily require an ATV or a dirt bike. You can do it in a high clearance vehicle or a 4WD sport utility vehicle. This guide gives directions for the route from point to point, gives tips on what to bring and how to prepare, provides background information on history and general topics, and directs travelers to points of interest along the way. This 150-mile-long discovery trail is a perfect place to begin your explorations of the Plumas National Forest! Plumas National Forest Plumas National Forest Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail is published by the USDA Forest Service, in cooperation with the California State Parks OHV Division. Printed in the USA 2013 ISBN: Welcome to the Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail (BDT) invites exploration of the remote areas of the Plumas National Forest. You can expect rough road conditions on gravel and dirt roads and a slow pace of travel, maybe only 30-50 miles a day. Be prepared for downed trees or rocks on the road, rough and rocky surfaces, and brush encroaching on the road- way. Much of the route is under snow in the winter and early spring. There are no restaurants, grocery stores, or gas stations along the main route and cell phone coverage is intermittent. The non-paved roads are currently maintained for travel by sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and high-clearance vehicles.
  • Position Outreach Announcement

    Position Outreach Announcement

    USDA FOREST SERVICE INTERMOUNTAIN REGION, R4 HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST AUSTIN/TONOPAH RANGER DISTRICTS Rangeland Management Specialist December 17, 2009 About thePosition… The Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest will soon be filling a Rangeland Management Specialist position, GS-0454-5/7/9, located in Austin, Nevada on the Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts. The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts administer grazing on 47 cattle allotments and 2 sheep allotments. The Districts also manage thirteen wild horse and burro territories. This position offers a variety of opportunities for individuals to develop skills and enjoy a variety of challenging experiences. Are you Interested? Interested applicants, or those desiring further information, should contact Steven Williams, Austin/Tonopah District Ranger, at (775) 964-2671 or email at: [email protected] ; or Heather Mobley 775-964-2671 or email at [email protected] For additional Forest and District information, check out the H-T website… http://www.fs.fed.us/htnf/ The Forest … At over 6.3 million acres, the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is the largest National Forest in the contiguous United States. The Forest spans the entire state of Nevada, with one million acres of land in the eastern part of California, along the Eastern Sierra Front. The Districts … The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts have two offices one in Austin and the other in Tonopah, Nevada. The Districts are managed as one unit under one District Ranger, with employees working out of both offices. The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts are responsible for the management of approximately 2.2 million acres of National Forest System Lands.
  • The Desert Sage OUR 77Th SEASON MAY–JUNE 2018 ISSUE NO

    The Desert Sage OUR 77Th SEASON MAY–JUNE 2018 ISSUE NO

    The Desert Sage OUR 77th SEASON MAY–JUNE 2018 ISSUE NO. 375 http://desertpeaks.org/ In this issue: Chair’s Corner Chair’s Corner Page 2 by Tina Bowman DPS Leadership Page 3 DPS Trips and Events Pages 4-7 Bob Michael’s pro- DPS Election Results Page 7 posal for adding DPS Banquet Flyer Pages 8-9 peaks to the DPS list Outings Chair Page 10 to bring the number Treasurer’s Report Page 10 up to one hundred is DPS List Update Page 10 a good one. So how Membership Report Page 11 do we add peaks? Conservation Chair Page 12 Here are some high- Letter to the Editor Page 12 lights of the process. Passages Page 13 Any member can Trip Reports: propose an addition Corkscrew Peak Page 14 or deletion in writing Smith Mtn. and Stewart Point Pages 14-15 to the Mountaineer- Pyramid Peak Pages 15-16 ing Committee, Mojave Desert Pages 16-17 chaired by the vice chair. Any proposed peak addi- Desert Books Pages 18-21 tion must be scheduled and climbed on a DPS- Great Basin Peaks Section News Page 21 sponsored outing and reported in the Sage before DPS Merchandise Page 22 the ballot appears, and there should be time for pro Sierra Club Membership Application Page 23 and con arguments in several issues of the Sage be- DPS Membership Application Page 23 fore the ballot is sent to members. A majority vote DPS Info Page 24 approves the listing (or delisting) of the peak. The bylaws give the full process here: THE NEXT SAGE SUBMISSION DEADLINE IS JUNE 10, 2018 http://desertpeaks.org/adobepdffiles/ The Desert Sage is published six times a year by bylawsmarch2012.pdf.