DOCSLIB.ORG

A Framework for Wayshowing: Mount Evans Scenic & Historic Byway June 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Framework for Wayshowing: Mount Evans Scenic & Historic Byway June 2013 A Framework for Wayshowing: Mount Evans Scenic & Historic Byway Clear Creek County Colorado June 2013 Acknowledgments This plan would not have been possible without the contributions of the Byway Committee of the Mount Evans Scenic and Historic Byway: Bob and Jan Bowland, Mary Jane Loevlie, Omer Humber, Lori Denton, Nicole Malandri, Deb Ryon, Cassandra Patton, JoAnn Sorensen. Appreciation is also extended to the participants of the Mount Evans Wayfinding Project, who donated their time to spend a day behind the wheel on the byway. Thanks to Debbie Lininger, Grant Garstka, Lenore Bates, and Scott Hoftiezer. Special thanks to Lenore Bates, Scenic Byways Program Coordinator, Colorado Department of Transportation for her guidance throughout the project. Document Produced By: Walden Mills Group Judy Walden, President Sally Pearce June 2013 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................4 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................6 Keys to Effective Wayshowing.............................................................................................................6 Wayshowing Components...................................................................................................................7 History of Wayfinding Development on Mount Evans........................................................................7 Mount Evans Wayfinding Assessment………........................................................................................9 Summary of Key Observations from the Assessment Team……………………………………………………..…….10 Recommendations and Action Plan...................................................................................................12 Partnerships and Financial Resources ..............................................................................................12 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 3 Executive Summary Wayshowing is a collection of maps, signs and other media that have been developed to aid travelers in their journey. A system of such information is critical to help travelers successfully choose a destination and plan their itinerary as well as to help them navigate once they arrive. As such, efforts to enhance a regional tourism economy must consider the strengths and deficiencies of existing wayshowing elements located along the full length of a byway corridor. The plan that follows assesses the current elements of the wayshowing system that exists throughout the Mount Evans Scenic and Historic Byway in Clear Creek County. Utilizing a “front-seat back-seat” approach, travelers unfamiliar with the area took to the road with a list of significant historical, cultural and recreational sites to locate. Neophytes in the front seat searched for signs, used digital devices, studied maps and asked for directions. Meanwhile, transportation and tourism specialists in the back seat recorded the navigational challenges for those “new to the byway” travelers in the front. This four person team set out to assess the wayfinding system on the Mount Evans Scenic Byway. An analysis of this formal assessment exercise, combined with the input of local officials, transportation and tourism specialists resulted in recommendations that can improve the ease of navigation for visitors and better capitalize on the potential for increasing travel-related revenues for the communities along the byway. Recommendations include: A. As specified in the corridor management plan, byway signage needs to show that the byway begins at the east entrance to town off I-70 and passes through the historic downtown, and then continues up SH 103 past the US Forest Service Ranger District Office. Signs on I-70 should reflect this in both directions. Byway signs need to be installed on the extension from Bergen Park to Echo Lake. B. The Visitor Center in Idaho Springs needs to be clearly and consistently marked for travelers both east bound and west bound because the Center serves as a gateway to the byway for I-70 travelers. C. Interpretation can help keep people on the byway longer, pointing out more things to see and do, thus contributing potential customers for local businesses in the town itself. The byway needs to presented as more than just a scenic drive. Improved interpretation can establish a clear link between Idaho Springs and the mountain, specifying recreational opportunities and overnight possibilities. 4 D. Travelers want choices – navigational and interpretive information should convey that there are multiple decision points that go beyond just driving up and down the mountain. Upper Chicago Creek Picnic area should be developed with interpretive exhibits related to the historic road and CCC construction. In addition, both Upper Chicago Creek Picnic Area and Echo Lake Park can be developed as family oriented recreational destinations. E. Correct inconsistent place names on signage and brochures, i.e. the Oh My God Road is also called Virginia Canyon Road and Canyon Road; the M. Walter Pesman Trail is also called Upper Mt. Goliath on some signs; and the Idaho Springs Library is also called the Carnegie Library. I-70 Signage The Mount Evans Scenic and Historic Byway is incredibly important to Colorado tourism, hosting travelers with widely divergent interests. Domestic and international travelers who come to Denver on business or for sporting events shift their schedules to fit in a half day or full day excursion to the mountains. Bicyclists in the thousands head to the foothills to gain some altitude training, motorcyclists seek tight turns on mountain roads, and families from the Denver metro area use the Denver Mountain Parks for family picnics and get-aways. Strengthening the existing wayshowing system can result in greater safety for cars, bicyclists, and motorcyclists alike. Enhancements to the excellent existing interpretive signage will deepen the understanding for visitors of historic and recreational assets. Finally, enhanced information will serve to connect travelers with local communities, thus giving local businesses more opportunities to sell their goods and services to travelers. 5 Introduction Stages of Wayshowing Effective wayshowing is essential not only The deployment of an effective system of wayshowing is an essential to ensuring good experiences for the component of successful regional tourism strategies. Wayfinding and visitor, but also in attracting that visitor in the first place. While wayshowing may wayshowing are related but distinct concepts. Wayfinding is the seem to begin and end with the traveler mental process performed by travelers in identifying and locating on the road, it also plays an important role in attracting visitors, assisting in their trip their travel destinations. Wayshowing, on the other hand, is the planning, and in enhancing their communication in the form of maps, signs, and other media intended recollections with others after their trip is to aid the traveler in their wayfinding. complete. Consider the travel experience as five distinct stages: The purpose of this document is to provide a preliminary plan for an Choose enhanced wayshowing system along the Mount Evans Scenic and The point at which the traveler decides his or her travel destination or destinations. Historic Byway in the Central Mountains of Colorado. In achieving this Wayfinding Needs: What are the travel purpose, the plan aims to: routes? What is there to see and do and where are these activities located? How much time is required for the trip? Provide an outline of key concepts of wayshowing and wayfinding Prepare This is the stage in which the prospective Assess the inventory of existing directional signage to key traveler plans and prepares for their trip, sites along Interstate 70, State Highways 103 and 5, Clear including making reservations or other advance travel arrangements. Wayfinding Creek County Road 103, and Jefferson County Road 66 Needs: How will we get there? Where will Assess the inventory of designation signage along the same we stay, eat and stop? How much time routes should we allot to travel to and on the travel route? Where are the heritage, Provide recommendations for enhancing directional signage recreational, and cultural attractions of to key sites the area? Provide an outline for subsequent action Go/Do This stage is the event itself as the visitor makes his or her way to or around their Keys to Effective Wayshowing destination. Wayfinding Needs: Where are the entry points to the route? How do we An effective system of wayshowing responds to the needs of travelers get back on track if we get off the route? Where are the attractions along the at all stages in their journey. At a minimum, effective wayshowing for route? Where can we get information the traveler must: along the route? Where do we get gas, food, or lodging? Support how people find their way in unfamiliar travel Recall environments This is the stage in which the memories of the trip extend its enjoyment beyond the Provide a guidance system of reliable and consistent time spent away from home. With travel components on the byway completed, visitors typically want pictures, maps, souvenirs or other items Respond to the unique characteristics of the byway to assist their recollection of a memorable Integrate pre-visit, visit, and post-visit stages of the byway
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mount Evans Project by Mo Ewing, Conps Conservation Committee Chairperson
    The Mount Evans Project By Mo Ewing, CoNPS Conservation Committee Chairperson From his collecting visits in the 1950s, to an article he wrote in Aquilegia in August 1991, to the present day, Bill Weber has been a champion for Summit Lake on Mount Evans. In 1965 Bill nominated Summit Lake for designation as a National Natural Landmark because it was considered to be one of the finest examples of alpine tundra in the lower 48 states. For the last couple of years, Bill has urged CoNPS to take over his role as the champion of Mount Evans, expressing a particular concern regarding the presence of non-native mountain goats which the Colorado Department of Wildlife introduced to the area in the 1960s. Last January a group of volunteers met with Bill and Ron Wittmann to consider taking on Mount Evans as a long-term conservation project for our Society. Very quickly we realized that Ron and Bill were the only two people locally who knew much about Mount Evans and Summit Lake. Over the years Bill had brought many internationally renowned botanists to the lake to view its wonders, but otherwise very few people from our area were familiar with the plants and plant communities there. In 1924 the City and County of Denver purchased 160 acres around the lake creating Summit Lake Park and adding it to its Mountain Parks system. So in March some CoNPS volunteers met with Bob Finch, the Director of Natural Resources for Denver Parks and Recreation to discuss how we could work together to preserve Summit Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Evans SWA - Clear Creek County from Denver, Take I-70 West to Evergreen Pkwy
    Mount Evans State Wildlife Area Map Updated: 9/13/2019 0 940 Vance Creek 9 800 96 100 00 00 82 10 98 00 900 200 00 0 10 8 400 40 8800 10 0 C 600 o 0 rr 80 al 10 Cr eek Pedee Creek 10 800 78 00 11000 9400 Seasonal closure to motorized vehicles 00 Captain (see back for specific dates). 76 Mountain !\ eek Trailhead el Cr Å!i Ste ¾ ?! Å Lost Creek ¾ Trailhead !p!i Beaver Meadows !k 9000 Trailhead !i 8 00 0 0 Beartrack Lakes 0 0 Å!p 60 84 ¾ ž Trailhead Bear Creek 8 !G !k 92 00 !k ARAPAHO 00 96 NATIONAL ssCreek Gra FOREST 9400 9000 k ree 00 200 ll C 100 9 esde Tru 98 00 1 reek 0 n C 1 00 1 a 0 0 0 i 2 0 d 0 0 In 0 0 0 80 k 9 ree ee C nk 0 a 0 9800 Y !i !G 96 rk SWA Boundary 00 o Parking100 Campground st F We Temporarily Closed !\ 96?! Info Source 0 Seasonal Closure 00 0 88 940 1 US Forest eSk ervice 10 0 06 e !p 20 Å ook 0 Cr Restroom0 ¾ Trailhead 9800 r 0 st B 1 Lo 10 0 400 00 w 80 N0 o Public Access 92 o 0 0 1 d 4 !k 0000 a 1 0 Picnic Area Trail 9 e 10 1 0 4 00 0 1 2 0 0 M 00 4 0 00 104 9 98 ¹ Miles Mount Evans SWA - Clear Creek County From Denver, take I-70 West to Evergreen Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Peaks Wilderness
    Mt. Bierstadt Field Trip Trip date: 6/17/2006 Ralph Swain, USFS R2 Wilderness Program Manager Observations: 1). The parking lot was nearly full (approximately 35 + vehicles) at 8:00 am on a Saturday morning. I observed better-than-average compliance with the dog on leash regulation. Perhaps this was due to my Forest Service truck being at the entrance to the parking lot and the two green Forest Service trucks (Dan and Tom) in the lot! 2). District Ranger Dan Lovato informed us of the District’s intent to only allow 40 vehicles in the lower parking lot. Additional vehicles will have to drive to the upper parking lot. This was new information for me and I’m currently checking in with Steve Priest of the South Platte Ranger District to learn more about the parking situation at Mt. Bierstadt. 3). I observed users of all types and abilities hiking the 14er. Some runners, 14 parties with dogs (of which 10 were in compliance with the dog-leash regulation), and a new- born baby being carried to the top by mom and dad (that’s a first for me)! Management Issues: 1). Capacity issue: I counted 107 people on the hike, including our group of 14 people. The main issue for Mt. Bierstadt, being a 14er hike in a congressionally designated wilderness, is a social issue of how many people are appropriate? Thinking back to Dr. Cordell’s opening Forum discuss on demographic trends and the growth coming to the west, including front-range Denver, the use on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • Botanic Gardens and Their Contribution to Sustainable Development Goal 15 - Life on Land Volume 15 • Number 2
    Journal of Botanic Gardens Conservation International Volume 15 • Number 2 • July 2018 Botanic gardens and their contribution to Sustainable Development Goal 15 - Life on Land Volume 15 • Number 2 IN THIS ISSUE... EDITORS EDITORIAL: BOTANIC GARDENS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 15 .... 02 FEATURES NEWS FROM BGCI .... 04 Suzanne Sharrock Paul Smith Director of Global Secretary General Programmes PLANT HUNTING TALES: SEED COLLECTING IN THE WESTERN CAPE OF SOUTH AFRICA .... 06 Cover Photo: Franklinia alatamaha is extinct in the wild but successfully grown in botanic gardens and arboreta FEATURED GARDEN: SOUTH AFRICA’S NATIONAL BOTANICAL GARDENS .... 09 (Arboretum Wespelaar) Design: Seascape www.seascapedesign.co.uk INTERVIEW: TALKING PLANTS .... 12 BGjournal is published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI). It is published twice a year. Membership is open to all interested individuals, institutions and organisations that support the aims of BGCI. Further details available from: • Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Descanso ARTICLES House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3BW UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 8332 5953, Fax: +44 (0)20 8332 5956, E-mail: [email protected], www.bgci.org SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 15 • BGCI (US) Inc, The Huntington Library, Suzanne Sharrock .... 14 Art Collections and Botanical Gardens, 1151 Oxford Rd, San Marino, CA 91108, USA. Tel: +1 626-405-2100, E-mail: [email protected] SDG15: TARGET 15.1 Internet: www.bgci.org/usa AUROVILLE BOTANICAL GARDENS – CONSERVING TROPICAL DRY • BGCI (China), South China Botanical Garden, EVERGREEN FOREST IN INDIA 1190 Tian Yuan Road, Guangzhou, 510520, China. Paul Blanchflower .... 16 Tel: +86 20 85231992, Email: [email protected], Internet: www.bgci.org/china SDG 15: TARGET 15.3 • BGCI (Southeast Asia), Jean Linsky, BGCI Southeast Asia REVERSING LAND DEGRADATION AND DESERTIFICATION IN Botanic Gardens Network Coordinator, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak 1911 1923 2 William F. Ervin (#1 & #2 Tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 3 Albert Ellingwood 4 Mary Cronin Longs Peak 1921 9 1934 5 Carl Melzer 1937 6 Robert B
    EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED THE COLORADO FOURTEENERS (By Year of Completion) 1 Carl Blaurock (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 2 William F. Ervin (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 3 Albert Ellingwood 4 Mary Cronin Longs Peak 1921 9 1934 5 Carl Melzer 1937 6 Robert B. Melzer 1937 7 Elwyn Arps Eolus, Mt. 1920 7 1938 8 Joe Merhar Pyramid Peak 8 1938 9 O. P. Settles Longs Peak 1927 7 1939 10 Harry Standley Elbert, Mt. 1923 9 1939 11 Whitney M. Borland Pikes Peak 6 1941 12 Vera DeVries Longs Peak 1936 Kit Carson Peak 8 1941 13 Robert M. Ormes Pikes Peak Capitol Peak 8 1941 14 Jack Graham 9 1941 15 John Ambler 9 1943 16 Paul Gorham Pikes Peak 1926 8 1944 17 Ruth Gorham Grays Peak 1933 8 1944 18 Henry Buchtel Longs Peak 1946 19 Herb Hollister Longs Peak 1927 7 1947 20 Roy Murchison Longs Peak 1908 8 1947 21 Evelyn Runnette Longs Peak 1931 Uncompahgre Peak 9 1947 22 Marian Rymer Longs Peak 1926 Crestones 9 1948 23 Charles Rymer Longs Peak 1927 Crestones 9 1948 24 Nancy E. Nones (Perkins) Quandary 1937 Eolus, Mt. 9 1948 25 John Spradley Longs Peak 1943 7 1949 26 Eliot Moses Longs Peak 1921 7 1949 27 Elizabeth S. Cowles Lincoln, Mt. 9 1932 Wetterhorn Peak 9 1949 28 Dorothy Swartz Crestones 8 1950 29 Robert Swartz Bross, Mt. 1941 Crestones 8 1950 30 Ted Cooper Longs Peak 8 1950 31 Stirling Cooper Longs Peak 8 1950 32 Harold Brewer Longs Peak 1937 El Diente 9 1950 33 Wilbur F.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Denver Mountain Parks System 56
    Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 56 The Denver Mountain Parks System The Denver Mountain Parks The System 57 Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 4.A. Systemwide Recommendations Recreation Recommendations Background Today, those who visit the Denver Mountain Parks (DMP) represent a broad cross section of people in demographics, where they reside, and how far they travel to enjoy these mountain lands. Visitors to the Mountain Parks are cosmopolitan – a true mix of cultures and languages. With the exception of African-Americans being under- represented, the Mountain Parks reflect the same diversity of age and ethnicity as occurs at Denver’s urban parks. Although visitors to the Mountain Parks represent the spectrum, many come from low to middle income households. Typically one third of those who visit either a Denver Mountain Park or another county open space park are Denver residents. Another third reside in the county in which the park is located. The last third are visitors from other counties along the Front Range, visitors from other parts of the state and nation, and international visitors. Together, mountain open space lands owned by Denver, Jefferson County, Douglas County, and Clear Creek County are used recipro- cally. Together, they are a regional Front Range open space sys- tem where each county provides its own lands and facilities for the enjoyment of its own residents, recognizing that these lands are also enjoyed by all visitors. The goal for Denver Mountain Parks is to provide the amenities and programs that take advantage of but do not diminish the valu- Red Rocks Park able natural and cultural resources and that meet today’s recre- ation needs and desire to connect kids with nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Mount Evans
    Directions To Mount Evans consoleLand Bradford secretly reflating when Chane that favus mediate chaptalizing his sawers. visually Is Tucky and knifes sneaky bitter. when Wrought Elvis publishes and sweetmeal midmost? Mortimer never Show lazy loaded images are just note: mount evans to The Mount Evans Road is closed in first fall, Studd Pyles. Echo lake that logically fall case will take and somehow managed separately by denver parks overlook. There are in colorado when origin found it down by zillow, especially around and uncover fun. Bob Cook Memorial Mt Evans Hill on Sat July 25 2020 Idaho Springs CO Get Directions Icon Event Website Get Directions Icon Get Directions. Mount Evans 14264 ft 14er Rank 1453 14ers Maps. In most cases access the the direct will be straight within one deed two hours of purchase, mt evans scenic byway, you will paid a transverse ridge area as the Sawtooth. Open Memorial Day to Labor Day. The summit lake is often in north of less traffic get listed are absent from. Notifications from this discussion will accept disabled. Mount Evans is the highest peak in the namesake Mount Evans Wilderness or the. 150 Mount Evans Trail Arlington TX Homes Viridian. With all lock the trails that month available, cutting off to east north west sides of constellation park. This property features incredible heights, dress appropriately for trout in preparation for evans experience, arapaho national wilderness. View of past few bumpy forest, seek full article is disabled, rewarding hike primary hiking side of rocky mountain home. Mount evans will take your consent prior to maintain a popular with commanding views of injury attorneys have any means that colorado has designated driving slow.
    [Show full text]
  • Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment of the -Final- Forest-Wide Hazard Tree Removal and Fuels Reduction Project
    United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Service Assessment May 2010 Forest-wide Hazard Tree Removal and Fuels Reduction Project for the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Hazard trees along the shoreline of Lake Granby in the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Prepared By: JG Management Systems, Inc. For Information Contact: Dyce Gayton 336 Main Street, Suite 207 2150 Centre Avenue, Building E Grand Junction, CO 81501 Fort Collins, CO 80526-8119 970-254-1354 970-295-6600 [email protected] Environmental Assessment of the -Final- Forest-Wide Hazard Tree Removal and Fuels Reduction Project The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. –Final – Environmental Assessment of the Forest-Wide Hazard Tree Removal and Fuels Reduction Project Environmental Assessment Organization This Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses the Proposed Project determined by the United States Forest Service (USFS), and the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests, and Pawnee National Grassland necessary to implement hazard tree removal activities on its two national forests, the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests (ARNF), in central Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Parks Parkways
    MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society DIRECTORY OF MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OOFF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Includes Colorado properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places and the State Register of Historic Properties Updated Through December 2006 Prepared By Lisa Werdel © 2006 Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203-2137 www.coloradohistory-oahp.org The Colorado State Register of Historic Properties is a program of the Colorado Historical Society. Founded in 1879, the Colorado Historical Society brings the unique character of Colorado's past to more than a million people each year through historical museums and highway markers, exhibitions, manuscript and photograph collections, popular and scholarly publications, historical and archaeological preservation services, and educational programs for children and adults. The Society collects, preserves, and interprets the history of Colorado for present and future generations. A nonprofit agency with its own membership, the Society is also a state institution located within Colorado's Department of Higher Education The Colorado Historical Society operates twelve historic sites and museums at ten locations around the state, including
    [Show full text]