University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository

Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship

Fall 2015

THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON CYP19A1A, FOXL2, DMRT1 AND AMH EXPRESSION DURING SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER (PARALICHTHYS DENTATUS)

Catherine Curro Caruso University of New Hampshire, Durham

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis

Recommended Citation Caruso, Catherine Curro, "THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON CYP19A1A, FOXL2, DMRT1 AND AMH EXPRESSION DURING SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER (PARALICHTHYS DENTATUS)" (2015). Master's Theses and Capstones. 1042. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1042

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected].

THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON CYP19A1A, FOXL2, DMRT1 AND AMH EXPRESSION DURING SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER (PARALICHTHYS DENTATUS)

BY

CATHERINE CURRO CARUSO

B.A., Biology, Wellesley College, 2010

THESIS

Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Master of Science

In

Zoology

September, 2015

This thesis has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Zoology by:

Thesis Director, Dr. David L. Berlinsky, Professor of Biological Sciences

Dr. W. Huntting Howell, Professor of Biological Sciences

Dr. Timothy S. Breton, Postdoctoral Research/Teaching Associate, Department of Biological Sciences

On July 31, 2015

Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.

AKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank my advisor Dr. David L. Berlinsky and my committee members

Drs. W. Huntting Howell and Timothy S. Breton for giving me the opportunity to work on this project, and providing me with valuable insight along the way. In particular, Dr. Breton guided me through the molecular techniques I needed to complete this project. Funding for the project was provided by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station (HATCH). This project was made possible by GreatBay Aquaculture, who provided summer flounder larvae. I would also like to thank Jobriah Anderson from the UNH Hubbard Center for Genome Studies for his assistance in genotyping and Dr. Richaed G. Smith from the University of New Hampshire

(UNH) for his help with statistical analyses. I thank Dr. Matthew DiMaggio from the University of Florida for his help with system construction, maintenance and experimental design, and my fellow UNH graduate students Kristin Duclos and Linas Kenter for their help with animal husbandry and sampling. Lastly I thank my friends and family who steadfastly supported me throughout this degree.

iii

DEDICATION

TO MY PARENTS Frank Caruso and Paula Caruso

As long ago I carried to your knees The tales and treasures of eventful days, Knowing no deed too humble for your praise, Nor any gift too trivial to please, So still I bring with older smiles, my dears This gift with which to claim the old, dear right; Your faith throughout life’s many days and nights, Your love still close and watching through the years.

TO MY GRANDMOTHER Catherine Angela Delores Sancinito Curro

Who always believed in me the most, and encouraged me to never stop writing. We Catherines have to stick together.

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………..……..iii

DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………………...….…iv

LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………...……....….vii

LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………….…..…..viii

ABSTRACT………………………………………………...…………………………………….x

CHAPTER PAGE

I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………...1

Literature Cited…………………………………………………………………………..20

II. THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON OVARIAN AROMATASE (CYP19A1A) AND

SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER (PARALICTHYS DENTATUS)………32

Introduction………………………………………………………………………………33

Materials and methods……………………………………………………...……………34

Results……………………………………………………………………………………42

Discussion………………………………………..………………………………………44

Literature Cited…………………………………………………..………………………48

III. PRELIMINARY INGESTIGATIONS INTO FOXL2, DMRT1 AND AMH EXPRESSION

DURING SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER (PARALICHTHYS

DENTATUS)……………………………………………………………………….…………….54

Introduction………………………………………………………………………………54

Materials and methods………………………………………..………………………….56

v

Results……………………………………………………………………………………61

Discussion………………………………………………………..………………………66

Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………..……69

IV. CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………………………………….……73

APPENDIX A. ANIMAL CARE AND USE APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION……………..75

vi

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 – GenBank accession numbers, primer sequences and product sizes (bp) for partial cds

identification and QPCR assays, with percent efficiency (% eff) and mean cycle threshold

(Ct) values for QPCR assays. Mean Ct values refer to the mean 1/10 diluted standard

curve point for each assay. Higher Ct values indicate lower mRNA

abundance………………………………………………………………………………..40

Table 2 – Primer sequences and product sizes (bp) for partial cds identification and QPCR

assays, with percent efficiency (% eff) and mean cycle threshold (Ct) values for QPCR

assays. Mean Ct values refer to the mean 1/10 diluted standard curve point for each

assay. Higher Ct values indicate lower mRNA abundance……………………………...60

Table 3 – Quality trimmed sequences and product size (bp) for summer flounder foxl2,

, and amh. Individual fish from all three temperature treatments (13°C, 16°C and

19°C) were sampled throughout development for analyses……………62

vii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 – Temperature induced patterns of sex differentiation in teleosts adapted from

Luckenbach et al. 2009……………………………………………………………………5

Figure 2 – P450 aromatase converts testosterone into estradiol through removal of a methyl

group and aromatization of the steroid A ring…………………………………………...13

Figure 3 – Juvenile summer flounder (38 DPH) sampled for cyp9a1a gene expression analyses.

Dotted lines represent larval dissections made using razor blades to excise summer

flounder gonads. Area indicated by the arrow represents the gonadal region (GR) that

was preserved for later RNA extraction………………………………………………….36

Figure 4 – (A) Relative cyp19a1a mRNA abundances, normalized to eef1α, during early juvenile

development at initial sampling (38 DPH, 19°C), and at 52 and 66 DPH (13, 16 and

19°C). Each bar represents the mean + standard error. (B) Summer flounder sex ratios

determined after temperature treatments (44-217 DPH) and growout period (21°C, >150

mm total length). Sex was assessed by visual examination during gonadal dissection or

histology. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments and ages (p

< 0.05)……………………………………………………………………………………42

Figure 5 – Summer flounder (A) growth and (B) relative cyp19a1a mRNA abundances

(normalized to eef1α) during juvenile development at 13 and 16°C (38-191 DPH).

Asterisks denote significant differences between treatments (*p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ***

p < 0.001). (C) Relationship between relative cyp19a1a mRNA abundance (logarithmic

scale) and standard lengths (mm) of fish raised at 13 (p < 0.0001) and 16°C (p < 0.0001)

…………………………………………………………………………………………..43

viii

Figure 6 – Summer flounder in various stages of metamorphosis during transfer to the

Aquaculture Research Center (ARC) at 37 DPH. Individuals range from pelagic,

symmetrical larvae to demersal juveniles that have undergone eye migration and settled

to the bottom……………………………………………………………………………..57

Figure 7 – Relative (A) foxl2 (B) dmrt1 and (C) amh mRNA abundances (normalized to eef1α),

during early juvenile development at initial sampling (38 DPH, 19°C), and at 52 and 66

DPH (13, 16 and 19°C). Each bar represents the mean + standard error. Different letters

indicate significant differences among treatments and ages (p < 0.05)…………….……63

Figure 8 – Summer flounder relative (A) foxl2, (B) dmrt1 and (C) amh mRNA abundances

(normalized to eef1α) during juvenile development at 13 and 16°C (38-191 DPH).

Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments and ages (p < 0.05).

All unlabeled time point refer to ABC designations for pairwise comparisons…………64

Figure 9 – Relationship between relative (A) foxl2, (B) dmrt1and (C) amh mRNA abundance

(logarithmic scale) and standard length (mm) of fish raised at 13 and 16°C Asterisks

denote significant correlations (p < 0.05)………………………………………………..65

ix

ABSTRACT

THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON CYP19A1A, FOXL2, DMRT1 AND AMH

EXPRESSION DURING SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER

(PARALICHTHYS DENTATUS)

By Catherine Curro Caruso

University of New Hampshire, September 2015

Female summer flounder grow considerably faster and larger than males, and a tremendous increase in performance can therefore be realized through production of monosex female populations. Rearing temperature has been shown to affect sex differentiation in other teleost species by influencing expression of encoding transcription factors, hormones or enzymes involved in endocrine function such as cyp19a1a, foxl2, dmrt1 and amh. These genes have been linked to female (cyp19a1a, foxl2) or male (dmrt1, amh) development, and exhibit sexually dimorphic expression in some species. In the present study, summer flounder (37 days post hatch; DPH) were raised at 13°C, 16°C or 19°C. Fish from all three treatments were sampled during early development (38-66 DPH), and fish from 13 and 16°C treatments were sampled through later juvenile development (191 DPH). A partial summer flounder cDNA sequence for cyp19a1a was identified, verified, and submitted to the NCBI GenBank database.

Partial summer flounder sequences were also were identified for foxl2, dmrt1 and amh, but these single sequence reads were not verified or submitted to NCBI. Summer flounder samples were analyzed in qPCR to determine cyp19a1a, foxl2, dmrt1 and amh gene expression levels. Sex ratios of additional fish grown to > 150 mm at each temperature treatment were determined. Low

x female production was achieved overall (26.9, 17.6 and 0% at 13, 16 and 19°C, respectively).

Cyp19a1a expression was significantly lower at 52 DPH (~15 mm total length) at the male producing temperature (19°C), and increased to similar levels as other treatments at 66 DPH.

Cyp19a1a expression levels later in juvenile development (66-191 DPH) largely decreased with fish size. No clear trend in gene expression levels was present for foxl2, dmrt1 or amh. The period of sex differentiation in summer flounder remains unknown but cyp19a1a expression patterns suggest that it may occur earlier in development than that of congenerics, and that cyp19a1a may be a more robust sex marker in summer flounder than foxl2, dmrt1 or amh.

Further research is necessary to understand the sex-determining mechanisms in this species before sexually dimorphic growth can be used to achieve economic advantages in commercial production.

xi

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Global seafood demands have drastically increased over the past century, and will continue to do so as the world population grows. However, wild fisheries are overexploited worldwide, with fisheries capture production plateauing in the 1980s, and unlikely to increase in the near future. Consequently, aquaculture development is the most realistic avenue for increasing global seafood production to meet demands, while reducing dependence on wild fisheries (NOAA FishWatch Aquaculture). In fact, according to the Agricultural Research

Service, global aquaculture production must increase 500% by 2025 to meet the needs of a projected 8.5 billion world population (USDA Agricultural Research Service 2014). Currently the United States imports 91% of its seafood, 40% of which is from aquaculture, resulting in a

10.4 billion deficit in seafood imports that is second only to petroleum (Van Voorhees and

Lowther 2012). There are a large number of native marine species in the northeast United States that are popular for human consumption, yet only the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is cultured in significant quantities. However, the salmon industry faces many challenges, including market competition from imported fish, and competition with wild fisheries (NOAA FishWatch Atlantic

Salmon). Thus, it is critical that new marine aquaculture species are developed to expand US seafood production, and decrease dependence on imported seafood and wild fisheries.

Much research is needed on which species are most suitable for aquaculture, and how aquaculture can be optimized to maximize production and economic benefits. When choosing a new marine finfish species for culture, there are many qualities to consider. The species must

1 have a high market price, high consumer demand, and the ability to thrive in a wide range of culture conditions. Summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) meet these criteria, which gives them a great deal of potential for aquaculture. Summer flounder can tolerate a range of salinities, temperatures and dissolved oxygen levels, and can be cultured at high densities (Daniels et al.

1996; Packer et al. 1999). They are native to the eastern coast of the US, from Gulf of Maine to

South Carolina, and spend the summer months in shallow, coastal, estuarine environments. In the fall/winter months, summer flounder migrate offshore to the warmer water of the outer continental shelf, where they spawn (Packer et al. 1999). Summer flounder achieve sexual maturity around two years of age, and the L50 (size at which 50% of individuals are sexually mature) is 24.6 cm total length (TL) for males and 32.2 cm TL for females (Packer et al. 1999).

Females produce pelagic, buoyant eggs that hatch into 2 mm pelagic larvae. Like other

Paralichthyd species, summer flounder larvae are symmetrical and free-swimming in the water column. Pelagic larvae remain on the continental shelf for about a month before migrating inshore to coastal and estuarine nursery areas. During inshore migration, larvae undergo metamorphosis (around 13 mm TL), which involves migration of the right eye across the top of the head. Once they reach coastal/estuary habitats, they settle to the bottom, having achieved their asymmetrical, demersal, adult form (Packer et al. 1999). Summer flounder are popular for human consumption, and are fished commercially and recreationally year round, with a US fishery valued at over $28.6 million in 2010 (Packer et al. 1999; NOAA FishWatch Summer

Flounder 2014). They also have a high market price, with 2014 filet prices increasing to upwards of $10/pound in the northeastern United States, in part due to an overall shortage of groundfish

(FishChoice Summer Flounder 2014). Total annual summer flounder landings in the US peaked in 1983 at 26,100 metric tons (mt), and have been much lower in recent years, averaging 8,197

2 mt per year between 2007 and 2011 (Van Voorhees and Lowther 2012). Paralichthyd flounder are currently being cultured in South America, Central America and Asia, which produces over

78,000 tonnes annually (Lymer et al. 2010). By contrast, little research and development has been done on flounder culture in the United States.

Summer flounder are sexually dimorphic, with females that grow more quickly and achieve larger overall sizes than males. Previous research found that cultured summer flounder females were 1.4 times larger than males at 15 months post hatch, and were twice as large as males by harvest at 23 months (King et al. 2001). There is also evidence that females have higher natural survival rates than males (Morse 1981). Therefore, rearing female dominated populations in an aquaculture setting economically advantageous. Summer flounder are unable to tolerate cold coastal water temperatures in the fall/winter, which makes them unsuitable for year-round outdoor culture in the Northeast US. Closed, recirculating aquaculture systems are a viable alternative for year-round summer flounder culture, but these systems are expensive due to high construction and operating costs. Monosex female populations will reach market size in less time, reducing size heterogeneity, mortality due to cannibalism, length of “grow out” period, labor costs, and increasing the likelihood of successful commercial culture in recirculating systems (Luckenbach et al. 2002). However, in order to culture faster growing female fish, it is necessary to understand and control summer flounder sex determination and sex differentiation.

Vertebrates are highly diverse in their mechanisms for sex determination and sex differentiation, two closely linked processes that relate to whether an individual becomes male or female. Sex determination refers to the genetic and environmental processes and factors that influence sex differentiation, while sex differentiation is the physical development of male or female gonads during maturation (Devlin and Nagahama 2002). In many higher vertebrates such

3 as mammals, genotypic sex controls phenotypic development, but many lower vertebrates such as herptiles and fish have an environmental component to sex determination that can alter phenotypic sex (Piferrer 2001). Sex determining mechanisms vary among vertebrate groups, but there are three relatively conserved sex determining mechanisms; chromosomal, polygenic, and genotypic-environmental interaction (Piferrer 2001). In chromosomal and polygenic sex determination, sex is determined at fertilization. In chromosomal sex determination, individuals inherit highly evolved sex that contain most genes necessary for sex development.

There are two main chromosomal systems, the XX/XY system (homogametic females), and the

WZ/ZZ system (homogametic males). In polygenic sex determination, sex is controlled by sex- determining genes distributed among the other chromosomes (autosomes). Thus, the sex of an individual is determined by whether more male or female sex factors are expressed (Piferrer

2001). In genotypic-environmental sex determination, environmental factors such as pH, salinity, nutrition, density, social cues, temperature, and stress may alter genotypic sex, and result in a phenotype that differs from chromosomal sex (Prevedelli and Simonini 2000; Saillant et al.

2003; Lindsey 1962; Francis and Barlow 1993; Liu and Sadovy 2004; Conover and Kynard

1981; Sullivan and Schultz 1986; Mankiewicz et al. 2013).

Temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) is the most common type of environmental sex determination (ESD). It has been established in reptiles and amphibians, and has been documented in some teleost species (Crews 1996; Hayes; 1998; Conover and Kynard

1981; Middaugh and Hemmer 1987; Schultz 1993; Baroiller et al. 1996; Römer and Beisenherz

1996; Kwon et al. 2000; Mylonas et al. 2003; Ospina-Álvarez and Piferrer 2008). TSD species have no chromosomal system, and experience shifts in sex ratios in response to exposure to temperatures that fall within their natural range (Ospina-Álvarez and Piferrer 2008). TSD does

4 not occur in mammals and birds, which undergo embryonic development in controlled temperature conditions (Shen and Wang 2014).

Some teleosts possess a genotypic system that can be influenced by temperature, and are classified as genotypic sex determination + temperature effects (GSD + TE). The sex of GSD +

TE species is dictated by the interaction between a chromosomal system (consistent genetic differences between sexes), and the water temperature that fish experience during the sex- determining period of development. Recent studies suggest that many teleost species previously characterized as TSD including Japanese flounder are in fact GSD + TE (Ospina-Alvarez and

Piferrer 2008). Three main patterns of temperature-dependent sex determination have been identified. In pattern 1 there are more males at high temperatures, and more females at low temperatures, while in pattern 2 there are more females at high temperatures and more males at low temperatures. In pattern 3, there are more males at both high and low temperatures, and a 1:1 sex ratio at intermediate temperatures (Luckenbach et al. 2009). Recent research suggests that true TSD species only exhibit pattern 1, and other patterns may be indicative of GSD + TE species (Ospina-Alvarez and Piferrer 2008).

Figure 1. Temperature induced patterns of sex determination in teleosts, adapted from Luckenbach et al. 2009.

Japanese flounder, the most well studied Paralichthyd species, exhibit GSD + TE, with an

XX-XY chromosomal system that can be influenced by temperature. In Japanese flounder, XY

5 fish always develop into males, while genotypic (XX) females can be masculinized by exposure to certain water temperatures. Previous work has shown that at 18°C, Japanese flounder develop into their genotypic sex, resulting in a 1:1 sex ratio (Kitano et al. 1999). This was confirmed in another study, where genotypic females developed into males when raised at 25-27.58°C or

15.8°C, but developed into females when raised at 17.5-22.58°C (Yamamoto et al. 1999).

Cumulatively, these studies indicate that Japanese flounder follow pattern 3 of sex differentiation, a U-shaped pattern with high male production at high and low temperatures, and a 1:1 sex ratio that aligns with genotypic sex at intermediate temperatures. Japanese flounder raised at 15°C complete metamorphosis 25-50 DPH, at ~17.5 mm TL (11.4mm SL) (Fukuhara

1986). They undergo sex differentiation at 32 mm TL, while their ovarian cavity is not present until ~40 mm TL (Yamamoto 1999; Goto et al. 1999; Kitano et al. 1999).

The sex determination pattern for Southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma), another congeneric species, is less clear. A previous study using North Carolina fish produced 78% males at 18°C, 96% males at 28°C, and a 1:1 sex ratio at 23°C, which suggests a U-shaped pattern of sex differentiation similar to that of Japanese flounder (pattern 3; Luckenbach et al.

2003). However, a more recent study on fish from the Texas Gulf Coast found that the proportion of females decreased with increasing water temperatures between 18.2°C and 29.6°C, which is consistent with pattern 1 of sex differentiation (Montalvo et al. 2012). The contradiction between these two studies may be attributed to adaptive variation due to geographical differences between Southern flounder populations, but certainly merits additional research. Since neither a chromosomal system nor a consistent pattern of sex differentiation has been confirmed in this species, it is unknown if they can be classified as GSD-TE. Southern flounder raised at 17-18°C undergo metamorphosis at ~30 DPH, and complete the process at ~45

6

DPH, when they are 10-16 mm TL (Daniels et al. 1996; Daniels 2000). Sex differentiation does not occur until ~65 mm total length, while the ovarian cavity and early-stage meiotic oocytes become visible at ~75-100 mm (Luckenbach et al. 2005).

Summer flounder exhibit primary gonochorism, which means that gonadal primordium in juveniles develops directly into either testes or ovaries, causing them to become males or females. Once an individual becomes male or female, it remains the same sex throughout life

(Piferrer 2001). It is unknown whether or not summer flounder possess an XX/XY chromosomal system similar to that of Japanese flounder, but it has been established that more females are produced at lower temperatures, and more males occur at higher temperatures. Previous experiments on summer flounder juveniles produced 22.9% females at 12°C, 0% females at

21°C and 3.9% females at 26°C, and commercial production achieved 26% females at 18°C

(Colburn et al. 2009; Colburn et al. 2015). Among meiogynogenetic individuals, 62.5% females were produced at 12°C and 0% females were produced at 21°C and 26°C (Colburn et al. 2009).

Previous studies on summer flounder have been unable to achieve a 1:1 sex ratio, and it is unclear when the critical period for temperature exposure in summer flounder occurs, and whether this critical period is driven by fish size or fish age. However, it is known that summer flounder metamorphose at 40 DPH, when fish are 14-20 mm TL (when raised at 17-18°C), and definitive gonadal development occurs long after metamorphosis, at ~100-150 mm TL (Colburn et al. 2009).

Previous studies have also established a relationship between stress and masculinization of Paralichthyd species. Juvenile Japanese flounder raised at 27°C exhibited higher cortisol levels and higher rates of masculinization than juveniles raised at 18°C, which suggests a link between temperature-induced masculinization of Japanese flounder and elevated cortisol levels

7

(Yamaguchi et al. 2010). Southern flounder exhibited significant masculinization and elevated cortisol levels when raised in blue tanks as opposed to black or gray tanks, indicating that stress due to tank color can also result in higher male production (Mankiewicz et al. 2013). Summer flounder may exhibit similar stress-induced masculinization in response to environmental factors, though it is unknown whether temperature or some other stressor has the most significant effect on sex differentiation.

Species with a temperature component to sex differentiation are particularly vulnerable to global climate change, which is causing long term alterations in ocean temperatures worldwide

(EPA Climate Change Indicators 2014). Climate change models have established the potential for female dominated loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) populations, and a recent study on teleost fishes confirms that climate change may cause skewed sex ratios in temperature- dependent species (Hawkes et al., 2007; Ospina-Álvarez and Piferrer 2008). However, it is unclear how much changing ocean temperatures will affect sex ratios in species such as summer flounder that may possess a genotypic-environmental sex determination system rather than a solely TSD system. Recent NOAA surveys on juvenile summer flounder found that wild populations are dominated by males (Powell and Morson 2008). Ocean warming is more rapid in the Northern hemisphere, particularly in the north Atlantic region that summer flounder inhabit

(Rhein et al. 2013). Rising ocean temperatures along the eastern coast of the US could further impact the temperature sensitive sex differentiation of summer flounder by causing high rates of masculinization, resulting in wild populations with unusually high male production, and reduced reproductive success. Consequently, it is essential to understand the relationship between temperature and sex differentiation in summer flounder in order to predict how changing ocean temperatures may affect wild populations.

8

The sequence of molecular events during sex differentiation in mammals has been well established. Mammals have a chromosomal system of sex differentiation where XY individuals develop into males, and those without a Y (XX) develop into females. More specifically, the SRY gene on the short arm of the Y chromosome is responsible for male differentiation (Waters et al. 2007). There are a number of genes involved in sex differentiation in mammals such as SOX9, DAX1, SF1 and WT1 that are not sex specific, but do demonstrate sexually dimorphic expression. SOX9 is important in male differentiation (Moreno-Mendoza et al. 2004; Barrioneuvo et al. 2006; Kojima et al. 2008) while DAX1, located on the X chromosome, is important in ovarian differentiation (Manolakou et al. 2006). SF1 is an essential factor in reproduction, based on its involvement in the hypothalamic-pituitary-steroidogenic organ axis (Caron et al. 1997), and WT1 encodes a involved in kidney and gonadal development (Davies et al. 1999). However, little is known about the exact roles of these genes during sex differentiation.

Birds also have a chromosomal sex determining mechanism, with heterogametic females

(ZW) and homogametic males (ZZ). There is likely a comparable W-linked gene responsible for ovarian development in birds, but it has not been identified (Short 1998). There are several possible mechanisms for sex differentiation in birds. One mechanism suggests that the testis is the default gonad, and genes on the W chromosome induce ovarian development, much like the

SRY gene in mammals. Another model suggests that there is a dosage mechanism where males receive two doses of a particular gene product, while females receive only one (Clinton 1998).

Dmrt1 may be involved in the dosage mechanism, where a higher dosage results in testicular differentiation in males, activating expression (a gene linked to male development) and reducing expression of genes linked to female development (Smith et al. 2009). There is also

9 evidence that in females, testis growth is accelerated at the beginning of development, but is overtaken by ovarian growth, which is mediated by the presence of estrogen rather than the presence of a particular gene (Mittwoch 1998).

Reptiles are diverse in their sex determining mechanisms, which range from genetic sex determination (GSD; XX/XY or WZ/ZZ) to TSD (Viets et al. 1994; Wibbels et al. 1994). Some crocodilians and turtles have no obvious sex chromosomes, with gonadal developmental influenced by temperature and/or hormones (Spotila et al. 1998). The WT1, SOX9 and DMRT1 genes have also been identified in reptiles (Jeyasuria and Place 1998; Spotila et al. 1998;

Wibbels et al. 1998; Ferguson-Smith 2007).

In teleosts, ovarian development generally occurs before testes development, and many species possess sex determination systems that involve a combination of GSD and ESD (Piferrer

2001; Guerrero-Estévez and Moreno-Mendoza 2010). In some species, environmental factors, most commonly water temperature (TSD or TE), can override genetics, which may involve the

SF1 gene (Short 1998). It is likely that environmental factors moderate sex differentiation in fish via the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis (Devlin and Nagahama 2002). In this axis, environmental stimuli cause neurons in the hypothalamus to release gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). GnRH stimulates the pituitary gland to produce Gonadotropin I (GtH I), which is analogous to mammalian follicle stimulating hormone and promotes steroidogenesis and gonadal differentiation, and gonadotropin II (GtH II), which is analogous to mammalian luteinizing hormone and is produced before sexual maturation (Devlin and Nagahama 2002).

GtH I and GtHII cause the gonad to initiate sex steroidogenesis, which results in differentiation of either ovaries or testes. Sex steroids then become part of a positive or negative feedback loop until sex differentiation is complete. In species with TSD or TE, water temperature is the

10 environmental cue that influences the HPG pathway, thus affecting whether fish differentiate into males or females (Francis 1992; Devlin and Nagahama 2002; Strüssmann and Nakamura

2002; Godwin et al. 2003).

Sex differentiation in fish is highly sensitive to steroid hormones (Cardwell and Liley

1991; Strüssmann and Nakamura 2002). Across species, females exhibit higher levels of estradiol, which is the major sex steroid responsible for ovarian development, and males have higher 11-ketotestosterone levels, an androgen steroid responsible for testis development

(Yamamoto 1969; Nakamura et al. 1998). There have been a number of experiments where fish sex was altered by administration of exogenous estrogens or androgens (Cardwell and Liley

1991; Piferrer 2001; Devlin and Nagahama 2002). Plasticity of sex differentiation in fish varies by species, and species that utilize endogenous sex steroid production for gonad differentiation may be more influenced by environmental factors. These species undergo gonadal steroidogenesis before sex differentiation, as opposed to fish with strong genotypic sex determination, which do not undergo steroidogenesis until after sex differentiation. Androgen and estrogen receptors have been identified in both ovaries and testes, which suggests that exogenous steroids can affect both sexes (Strüssmann and Nakamura 2002). By contrast, sex steroids in mammals are not involved in gonad differentiation, but rather are responsible for shaping the sexually dimorphic structures during sexual development after sex differentiation has occurred (Strüssmann and Nakamura 2002). This may be because viviparous species have evolved mechanisms to prevent maternal estrogens from feminizing male embryos, which consequently prevents exogenous sex steroid from affecting sex determination (Short 1998).

In teleosts, there are a number of genes that play important roles in sex differentiation by producing hormones, enzymes and transcription factors linked to male or female development.

11

Cyp19a1a and forkhead transcriptional factor 2 (foxl2) are genes associated with female development, while doublesex/mab-3 related transcription factor 1 (dmrt1) and anti-Müllerian hormone (amh) are important in male differentiation. These genes have been established in other teleost species, including Paralichthyds, and thus are likely involved in sex differentiation of summer flounder (Kitano et al. 1999; Yoshinaga et al. 2004; Luckenbach et al. 2005; Nakamoto et al. 2006; Smith et al. 2013).

Cyp19a, the most well studied of these genes, has two isoforms in fish, an ovarian form

(cyp19a1a) and a brain form (cyp19a1b; Gelinas et al. 1998; Tchoudokova and Callard 1998;

Chiang et al. 2001; Kishida and Callard 2001; Kwon et al. 2001; Zhao et al. 2001; Blazquez and

Piferrer 2004; Chang et al. 2005; Greytak et al. 2005). These aromatase isoforms differ in their tissue distribution, responses to exogenous estrogen, and expression pathways during gonad ontogeny (Chang et al. 2005). Cyp19a1b is primarily expressed in the brain, specifically in the hypothalamus and ventral telencephalon, extending to the olafactory bulb (Chiang et al 2001). It encodes for brain aromatase, which is mainly involved in neural estrogen synthesis (Chang et al.

2005). Cyp19a1a is primarily expressed in the follicular cells lining vitellogenic oocytes in the ovary during vitellogenesis. Cyp19a1a encodes for cytochrome P450 aromatase (P450 ovarian aromatase), a steroidogenic enzyme that converts testosterone into E2 (17β estradiol; Figure 2;

Kitano et al. 1999; Liu et al. 2010). P450 aromatase is part of a superfamily of heme , the cytochromes P450, which function as oxygenases (Werck-Reichhart and Feyereisen 2000). It is a membrane bound enzyme associated with NADPH (Place et al. 2001) that uses the reductive equivalents from NADPH to convert androgens (C19) into estrogens (C18) by the removal of the methyl group (demethylation) and aromatization of the steroid A ring (Simpson et al. 1994;

Werck-Reichhart and Feyereisen 2000; Navarro-Martίn et al. 2011). Because estrogens are

12 needed for sex determination and differentiation, it is believed that cyp19a1a expression, and subsequent P450 aromatase activity is responsible for estradiol synthesis, and thus plays a key role in ovarian differentiation and development (Guiguen et al. 1999; Kitano et al. 1999; Suzuki et al. 2004; Chang et al. 2005). Conversely, cyp19a1a inhibition prevents estradiol biosynthesis, which results in testicular differentiation (Guiguen et al. 1999; Kitano et al. 1999; Kwon et al.

2001; Uchida et al. 2004). Recent research on European sea bass found that higher water temperatures increase methylation of a cyp19a1a promoter, which suppresses cyp19a1a expression, and results in masculinization of genotypic females Navarro-Martίn et al. 2011. This result was confirmed in Japanese flounder, where high levels of cyp19a1a promotor methylation were found in Japanese flounder testis and correlated with low cyp19a1a expression compared to that expressed in ovarian tissue (Wen et al. 2014). These studies provide the first evidence of an epigenetic mechanism that connects water temperature, cyp19a1a expression, and sex ratios in teleosts.

Figure 2. P450 aromatase converts testosterone into estradiol through removal of a methyl group and aromatization of the steroid A ring

Many fish species exhibit sexually dimorphic cyp19a1a expression, though the timing of expression in relation to sex differentiation varies. In Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), cyp19a1a can be detected five days post hatch (DPH), well before sex differentiation (Ijiri et al.

2008). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) cyp19a1a expression occurs at a slightly later stage, during sex differentiation (Rodriguez-Mari et al. 2005) while medaka (Ozyrias latipes) cyp19a1a expression

13 is detectable between 4 and 10 DPH, after sex differentiation is complete (Suzuki et al. 2004). In congeneric Paralichthyd species, Japanese flounder and Southern flounder, cyp19a1a expression coincides with sex differentiation, and has been used as an early predictor of fish sex (Kitano et al. 1999; Luckenbach et al. 2005). Japanese flounder begin to exhibit sexually dimorphic cyp19a1a expression at 32 mm TL, and can be masculinized by water temperatures until the completion of sex differentiation at ~40 mm TL (Kitano et al. 1999; Yamamoto 1999;

Yamaguchi et al. 2010). By contrast, cyp19a1a expression in southern flounder does not become a reliable biomarker of sex until 65 mm TL, and fish smaller than 90 mm TL can be masculinized by exposure to water temperature (Luckenbach et al. 2005). In numerous fish species, the administration of aromatase inhibitors such as Fadrozole (Novartis Pharma Ltd.,

Basil, Switzerland) or 17α-Methyltestosterone (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, MO) during sex differentiation leads to reduced P450 aromatase expression and testis formation. These studies with exogenous steroids confirm that gonadal cyp19a1a expression drives sex differentiation, with high expression leading to ovarian development, and low expression resulting in testicular development (Kitano et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2003; Bhandari et al. 2004;

Uchida et al. 2004; Li et al. 2006).

Forkhead transcriptional factor 2 (foxl2) is a member of the winged helix/forkhead group of transcription factors, which is highly conserved in vertebrates (Nakamoto et al. 2006;

Kobayashi et al. 2010). It has been shown to play a role in ovarian development of mammals, chickens, turtles and various fish species, and demonstrates sexually dimorphic gonadal expression in these species (Loffler et al. 2003; Baron et al. 2005). Foxl2 is recognized as the earliest known sex marker expressed during development in fish, and its expression is closely linked to P450 aromatase production. Within the ovary, foxl2 is expressed in the granulosa cells

14 that surround the previtellogenic and vitellogenic follicles, but it has not been detected in mature oocytes (Nakamoto et al. 2006; Kobayashi et al. 2010). It encodes a transcription factor that directly binds to a promoter region of cyp19a1a through its forkhead domain, which activates the transcription of P450 aromatase (Pannetier et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2007; Yamaguchi et al. 2007;

Ijiri et al. 2008; Guiguen et al. 2010).

Foxl2 expression precedes that of cyp19a1a in a number of fish species including medaka, Japanese flounder and Nile tilapia, which is evidence of its role in activating gene transcription in the ovary (Nakamoto et al. 2006; Yamaguchi et al. 2007). Foxl2 mRNA is co- localized with cyp19a1a mRNA in these species, and foxl2 expression correlates with cyp19a in both sexual dimorphism (high expression in developing ovaries, low expression in developing testes), and response to water temperature (Smith et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2004; Nakamoto et al.

2006; Yamaguchi et al. 2007; Kobayashi et al. 2010). In Japanese flounder, sexually dimorphic foxl2 expression occurs prior to morphological sex differentiation (at 50 DPH), and continues throughout sex differentiation, and certain water temperatures suppress foxl2 expression, resulting in increased levels of masculinization (Yamaguchi et al. 2007). However, some teleost species do exhibit differences between foxl2 and cyp19a1a expression patterns. In sablefish

(Anoplopoma fimbria), cyp19a1a has more pronounced sexual dimorphic expression than foxl2, while foxl2 is more broadly expressed in a greater number of tissue types, and is most highly expressed in the pituitary (Smith et al. 2013). Foxl2 has also been detected in the brain, pituitary, gills and gonads of Nile tilapia and the brain, pituitary, eye, gills and liver of the three-spot wrasse (Halichoeres trimaculatus), which suggests that it may be involved in the hypothalmic- pituitary-gonadal axis, likely through transcriptional regulation of the GnRH-GtH-sex steroid pathway (Wang et al., 2004; Kobayashi et al. 2010). In rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

15 two foxl2 paralogs have been identified that demonstrate differential expression. Foxl2a is expressed early in development, and highly correlates with cyp19a1a expression, while foxl2b is expressed later in development, and does not correlate with cyp19a1a expression (Baron et al.

2004; Baron et al. 2005). Overall these studies suggest that foxl2 plays an important role in activating cyp19a1a expression, and thus initiating female differentiation in fish, but foxl2 expression is not as reliable as an indicator of fish sex.

Doublesex/mab-3 related transcription factor 1 (dmrt1) is a gene that encodes a containing a DM-domain, which is a zinc fingerlike DNA binding motif (Ohmuro-Matsuyama et al. 2003; Kobayashi et al. 2008). Dmrt1 is highly conserved in both vertebrates and invertebrates, and plays a role in male development (Kobayashi et al. 2008). In mammals it has been linked to testis differentiation (Raymond et al. 2000), and in birds there is evidence that it may be the master sex-determining gene (Smith et al. 2009).

In fish, dmrt1 is more highly expressed in testes than in ovaries for a number of different species including Japanese flounder (Johnsen and Anderson 2012; Kobayashi et al. 2004;

Kobayashi et al. 2008; Herpin and Schartl 2011). A recent study on Japanese flounder found high levels of dmrt1 promotor methylation and low dmrt1 expression in ovaries, while no dmrt1 promoter methylation and high dmrt1 expression occurred in testes tissue (Wen et al. 2014). This further suggests that methylation of gene promoters may be the epigenetic mechanism by which water temperature influences sex ratios. The timing and location of dmrt1 expression varies greatly by teleost species (Johnsen and Anderson 2012; Kobayashi et al. 2004; Kobayashi et al.

2008; Herpin and Schartl 2011). In Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) and orange-spotted grouper

(Epinephelus coioides), dmrt1 expression is higher in the testes, and only occurs in spermatogonia (Xia et al. 2007; Johnsen et al. 2010; Johnsen and Anderson 2012). In medaka,

16 dmrt1 expression occurs after sex differentiation, (20-30 DPH), and is involved in regulating spermatogenesis in the testes (Kobayashi et al. 2004). Other studies on medaka have identified dmy (dmrt1b(y)) as a homolog of dmrt1 that is the master sex determining gene. Dmy occurs in the sex determining region of the Y chromosome, and its expression precedes that of dmrt1

(Matsuda et al. 2002; Matsuda et al. 2007). However, dmy is only present in two out of twenty closely related Ozyrias species, which suggests that dmy is not the master sex determining gene in other fish species, and demonstrates that mechanisms of sex differentiation can vary even among congenerics (Kondo et al. 2003). Species such as rainbow trout, Gobiocyprus rarus, zebrafish (Danio rerio) and Nile tilapia exhibit sexually dimorphic dmrt1 expression very early in development before any histological change in the gonads, with males exhibiting high dmrt1 expression that coincides with low cyp19a1a expression (Marchand et al. 2000; Cao et al. 2012;

Jorgensen et al. 2008; Kobayashi et al. 2008; Ijiri et al. 2008). In zebrafish, three different dmrt1 isoforms have been identified. Dmrt1 expression peaks before gonadal differentiation (10 DPH), but appears to be important in testis and ovary development (Guo et al. 2005). In tilapia, dmrt1 expression can be detected in the testes at 6 DPH, and increases throughout male development, but is never detectable in developing females. In developing Nile tilapia males, dmrt1 inhibits cyp19a1a gene transcription and estrogen production, which represses the expression of the female pathway and allows testes to develop (Ijiri et al. 2008; Jorgensen et al 2008; Kobayashi et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2010). In Nile tilapia and rainbow trout females sex reversed by hormones or medaka females sex reversed by high temperature exposure, high dmrt1 expression occurs in the testes, which is further evidence of its importance in male development (Marchand et al.

2000; Hattori et al. 2007; Kobayashi et al. 2008). Cumulatively these findings suggest that dmrt1

17 plays an important role in male differentiation of fish species, though the exact mechanism is unknown.

The amh gene codes for anti-Müllerian hormone (amh), also known as Müllerian inhibiting substance (mis), which is a glycoprotein that belongs to the transforming growth factor

β (TGF- β) superfamily (Yoshinaga et al. 2004). Amh has been well studied in mammals, where it is expressed in all individuals early in development, but is up-regulated in developing testes, and down-regulated in developing ovaries. In males, it causes the regression of Müllerian ducts, which would become the oviducts and uterus, while in females, it is weakly expressed in the granulosa cells surrounding the oocytes. When mammalian ovaries are exposed to amh, they experience inhibited cyp19a1a expression, which promotes male development (Cate et al. 1986;

Swain and Lovell-Badge 1999). In lower vertebrates, amh has been linked to the downregulation of foxl2 and cyp19a1a, and exhibits elevated expression in Sertoli cells during testis differentiation (Western et al. 1999; Rodríguez-Marí et al. 2005; Baroiller et al. 2009; Hattori et al. 2012).

Amh plays a role in testis differentiation and development in various fish species.

However, unlike mammals, fish do not have Müllerian ducts, and few details are known about the specific pathway (Yoshinaga et al. 2004; Rodríguez-Marí et al. 2005; Ijiri et al. 2008;

Siegfried 2010). In zebrafish, amh expression occurs in presumptive Sertoli cells prior to sex differentiation. Adult testes exhibit high amh expression, while adult ovaries exhibit decreasing amh expression in granulosa cells of developing oocytes that negatively correlates with increasing cyp19a1a expression (Rodríguez-Marí et al. 2005). Japanese flounder and Nile tilapia show similarly dimorphic amh expression. In these species, amh is expressed in all undifferentiated fish, but males demonstrate up-regulated amh expression during testicular

18 differentiation that correlates with inhibited cyp19a1a expression, while females exhibit the inverse pattern (Yoshinaga et al. 2004; Kitano et al. 2007; Ijiri et al. 2008; Baroiller et al.

2009).This expression pattern occurs in all Japanese flounder males, whether genetic (XY), or produced by masculinizing genotypic females (XX) through exposure to water temperatures or the anti-estrogen tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, MO) (Yoshinaga et al. 2004;

Kitano et al. 2007). In fact, there is evidence that amhy, an early expressed homolog of amh is the master sex determining gene in the Patagonian perjerrey (Odontesthes hatcheri), and in sablefish it is more sexually dimorphic than dmrt1 (Hattori et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2013). By contrast, sexually dimorphic amh expression has not been established in the medaka, and there appears to be no correlation between amh and cyp19a1a expression in this species (Klüver et al.

2007). In addition, amh expression in the Patagonian perjerrey is not influenced by temperature

(Shen and Wang 2014). Overall there is evidence that amh is an important gene for male differentiation in many fish species, though more research is needed to establish the specific role.

Previous research indicates that cyp19a1a, foxl2, dmrt1 and amh are robust sex markers in a number of fish species including Japanese flounder, and exhibit sexually dimorphic expression in ovaries and testes (Kitano et al. 1999; Yoshinaga et al. 2004; Luckenbach et al.

2005; Cao et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2013). Endocrine changes often occur before the gonads are visible in differentiating fish, which makes it likely that enzymes begin to influence sex differentiation before clear histological differences between males and females are observed

(Baroiller et al. 1999). Enzymes have optimal temperatures, and gene expression can also be thermally sensitive. Species such as summer flounder that have a temperature component to sex differentiation may experience increased or decreased gene expression and/or enzyme activity during a thermally sensitive period of sex differentiation. The combination of temperature

19 sensitive sex differentiation and sexually dimorphic growth in summer flounder has important implications for aquaculture and the wild flounder fishery. In summer flounder aquaculture, water temperature could be used to control sex differentiation, and manipulate phenotypic sex ratios. Lower water temperatures could be used to create populations dominated by faster and larger growing females, thereby increasing commercial aquaculture production efficiency

(Luckenbach et al. 2003). Commercial aquaculture of summer flounder in the US would provide a stable source of a popular finfish species while reducing dependence on imports and wild caught fish. As ocean temperatures rise, wild summer flounder populations may experience skewed sex ratios, resulting in male-dominated populations, and reduced reproductive success

(Ospina-Álvarez and Piferrer 2008).

The present studies use a combination of molecular and histological techniques to investigate the environmental component of sex change in summer flounder by 1). assessing the resulting sex ratios of summer flounder raised at 13°C, 16°C and 19°C 2). determining expression levels of cyp19a1a, foxl2, dmrt1 and amh, four genes that demonstrate sexually dimorphic expression in other teleost species 3). establishing relationships in timing and magnitude of expression levels of these four genes, and 4). using gene expression levels to identify the period of sex determination when summer flounder may be sensitive to temperature effects.

Literature Cited

Agricultural Research Service (2014) Trout-Grains Project. United States Department of Agriculture. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=21897

Baroiller JF, D’Cotta H, Bezault E, Wessels S, Hoerstgen-Schwark G (2009) Tilapia sex determination: where temperature and genetics meet. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 153:30-38

20

Baroiller JF, D’Cotta H, Saillant E (2009) Environmental effects on fish sex determination and differentiation. Sexual Development 3:118-135

Baroiller JF, Gulguen Y, Fostier A (1999) Endocrine and environmental aspects of sex differentiation in fish. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 55:910-931

Baroiller JF, Nakayama I, Foresti F, Chourrout D (1996) Sex determination studies in two species of teleost fish, Oreochromis niloticus and Leporinus elongatus. Zoological Studies 35(4):279-285

Baron D, Batista F, Chaffaux S, Cocquet J, Cotinot C, Cribiu E, De Baeree E, Guiguen Y, Jaubert F, Pailhoux E, Pannetier M, Vaiman D, Vigier B, Veitia R, Fellous M (2005) Foxl2 gene and the development of the ovary: a story about a goat, mouse, fish and woman. Reproduction Nutrition Development 45:377-382

Baron D, Cocquet J, Xia X, Fellous M, Guiguen Y, Veitia RA (2004) An evolutionary and functional analysis of Foxl2 in rainbow trout gonad differentiation. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 33:705-715

Barrioneuvo F, Bagheri-Fam S, Klattig J, Kist R, Taketo MM, Englert C, Scherer G (2006) Homozygous inactivation of sox9 causes complete XY sex reversal in mice. Biology of Reproduction 74:195-201

Bhandari RK, Higa M, Nakamura S, Nakamura M (2004) Aromatase inhibitor induces complete sex change in the protogynous honeycomb grouper (Epinephelus merra). Molecular Reproduction and Development 67:303-307

Blázquez M, Piferrer F (2004) Cloning, sequence analysis, tissue distribution, and sex-specific expression of the neural form of P450 aromatase in juvenile sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 219:83-94

Cao M, Duan J, Cheng N, Zhong X, Wang Z, Hu W, Zhao H (2012) Sexually dimorphic and ontogenetic expression of dmrt1, cyp19a1a and cyp19a1b in Gobiocypris rarus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 162:303-309

Cardwell JR, Liley NR (1991) Hormonal control of sex and color change in the stoplight parrotfish, Sparisoma viride. General and Comparative Endocrinology 81:7-20

Caron KM, Ikeda Y, Shiu-Ching S, Stocco DM, Parker KL, Clark BJ (1997) Characterization of the promoter region of the mouse gene encoding the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Molecular Endocrinology 11(2):138-147

21

Cate RL, Mattaliano RJ, Hession C, Tizard R, Farber NM, Cheung A, Ninfa EG, Frey AZ, Gash DJ, Chow EP, Fisher RA, Bertonis JM, Torres G, Wallner BP, Ramachandran KL, Ragin RC, Manganaro TF, MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK (1986) Isolation of the bovine and human genes for Müllerian inhibiting substance and expression of the human gene in animal cells. Cell 45:685-698

Chang X, Kobayashi T, Senthilkumaran B, Kobayashi-Kajura H, Sudhakumari CC, Nagahama Y (2005) Two types of aromatase with different encoding genes, tissue distribution and developmental expression in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). General and Comparative Endocrinology 141:101-115

Chiang EF, Yan Y-L, Guiguen Y, Postlethwait J, Chung B (2001) Two cyp19 (P450 aromatase) genes on duplicated zebrafish chromosomes are expressed in the ovary or brain. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18(4):542-550

Clinton M (1998) Sex determination and gonadal development: a bird’s eye view. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:457-465

Colburn HR, Breton TS, Nardi GC, Berlinsky DL (2015) Sex differentiation of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus L.) raised at practical hatchery temperatures. Aquaculture Research 46:1188-1196

Colburn HR, Nardi GC, Borski RJ, Berlisnky DL (2009) Induced meiotic gynogenesis and sex differentiation in summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus). Aquaculture 289:175-180

Conover DO, Kynard BE (1981) Environmental sex determination: interaction of temperature and genotype in a fish. Science 213:577-579

Crews D (1996) Temperature-dependent sex determination: the interplay of steroid hormones and temperature. Zoological Science 13(1):1-13

Daniels HV (2000) Species profile: Southern flounder. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Publication No. 726

Daniels HV, Berlinsky DL, Hodson RG, Sullivan CV (1996) Effects of stocking density, salinity, and light intensity on growth and survival of southern flounder Paralichthys lethostigma larvae. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 27(2):153-159

Davies R, Moore A, Schedl A, Bratt E, Miyahawa K, Ladomery M, Miles C, Menke A, van Heyningen V, Hastie N (1999) Multiple roles for the Wilms’ tumor suppressor, WT1. Cancer Research (Supplement) 59:1747s-1751s

Devlin RH, Nagahama Y (2002) Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: An overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208:191-364

22

Ferguson-Smith M (2007) The evolution of sex chromosomes and sex determination in vertebrates and the key role of DMRT1. Sexual Development 1:2-11

FishChoice Summer Flounder (2014) http://www.fishchoice.com/buying-guide/summer-flounder

Francis RC (1992) Sexual lability in teleosts: developmental factors. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67(1):1-18

Francis RC, Barlow GW (1993) Social control of primary sex differentiation in the Midas cichlid. Evolution 90:10673-10675

Fukuhara O (1986) Morphological and functional development of Japanese flounder in early life stage. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 52(1):81-91

Gelinas D, Pitoc GA, Callard GV (1998) Isolation of a goldfish brain cytochrome P450 aromatase cDNA: mRNA expression during the seasonal cycle and after steroid treatment. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 138:81-93

Godwin J, Luckenbach JA, Borski RJ (2003) Ecology meets endocrinology: environmental sex determination in fishes. Evolutions & Development 5(1):40-49

Goto R, Mori T, Kawamata K, Matsubara T, Mizuno S, Adachi S, Yamauchi K (1999) Effects of temperature on gonadal sex determination in barfin flounder Verasper moseri. Fisheries Science 65(6):884-887

Greytak SR, Champlin D, Callard GV (2005) Isolation and characterization of two cytochrome P450 aromatase forms in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus): differential expression in fish from polluted and unpolluted environments. Aquatic Toxicology 71:371-389

Guerrero-Estévez S, Moreno-Mendoza N (2010) Sexual determination and differentiation in teleosts. Reviews in Fishery Biology and Fisheries 20:101-121

Guiguen Y, Baroiller J-F, Ricordel M-F, Iseki K, McMeel OM, Martin SAM, Fostier A (1999) Involvement of estrogens in the process of sex differentiation in two fish species: the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and a tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Molecular Reproduction and Development 54:154-162

Guiguen Y, Fostier A, Piferrer F, Chang C-F (2010) Ovarian aromatase and estrogens: a pivotal role for gonadal sex differentiation and sex change in fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology 165:352-366

Guo Y, Cheng H, Huang X, Gao S, Yu H, Zhou R (2005) Gene structure, multiple alternative splicing, and expression in gonads of zebrafish Dmrt1. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 330:950-957

23

Hattori RS, Gould RJ, Fujioka T, Saito T, Kurita J, Strüssmann CA, Yokota M, Watanabe S (2007) Temperature-dependent sex determination in Hd-rR medaka Oryzias latipes: gender sensitivity, thermal threshold, critical period, and DMRT1 expression profile. Sexual Development 1:138-146

Hattori RS, Murai Y, Oura M, Masuda S, Majhi SK, Sakamoto T, Fernandino JL, Somoza GM, Yokota M, Strüssmann CA (2012) A Y-linked anti-Müllerian hormone duplication takes over a critical role in sex determination. PNAS 109(8):2955-2959

Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ (2007) Investigating the potential impact of climate change on a marine turtle population. Global Change Biology 13:923-932

Hayes TB (1998) Sex determination and primary sex differentiation in amphibians: genetic and developmental mechanisms. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:373-399

Herpin A, Schartl M (2011) Dmrt1 genes at the crossroads: A widespread and central class of sexual development factors in fish. FEBS Journal 278:1010-1019

Ijiri S, Kaneko H, Kobayashi T, Wang D-S, Sakai F, Paul-Prasanth B, Nakamura M, Nagaham Y (2008) Sexual dimorphic expression of genes in gonads during early differentiation of a teleost fish, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Biology of Reproduction 78:333-341

Jeyasuria P, Place AR (1998) Embryonic brain-gonadal axis in temperature-dependent sex determination of reptiles: a role for P450 aromatase (CYP19). The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:428-449

Johnsen H, Andersen O (2012) Sex dimorphic expression of five dmrt genes identified in the Atlantic cod genome. The fish-specific dmrt2b diverged from dmrt2a before the fish whole- genome duplication. Gene 505:221-232

Johnsen H, Seppola M, Torgensen JS, Delghandi M, Andersen O (2010) Sexually dimorphic expression of dmrt1 in immature and mature Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part B 156:197-205

King NJ, Nardi GC, Jones CJ (2001) Sex-linked growth divergence of summer flounder from a commercial farm: are males worth the effort? Journal of Applied Aquaculture 11(1/2):77-88

Kishida M, Callard GV (2001) Distinct cytochrome P450 aromatase isoforms in zebrafish (Danio rerio) brain and ovary are differentially programmed and estrogen regulated during early development. Endocrinology 142(2):740-750

Kitano T, Takamune K, Nagahama Y, Abe S-I (2000) Aromatase inhibitor and 17α methyltestosterone cause sex reversal from genetical females to phenotypic males and suppression of P450 aromatase gene expression in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Molecular Reproduction and Development 56:1-5

24

Kitano T, Takahume K, Kobayashi T, Nagahama Y, Abe S-I (1999) Supression of P450 aromatase gene expression in sex-reversed males produced by rearing genetically female larvae at a high water temperature during a period of sex differentiation in the Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 23:167-176

Kitano T, Yoshinaga N, Shiraishi E, Koyanagi T, Abe S-I (2007) Tamoxifen induces masculinization of genetic females and regulates P450 aromatase and Müllerian inhibiting substance mRNA expression in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Molecular Reproduction and Development 74:1171-1177

Klüver N, Pfennig F, Pala I, Storch K, Schlieder M, Froschauer A, Gutzeit HO, Schartl M (2007) Differential expression of anti-Müllerian hormone (amh) type II (amhrII) in the teleost medaka. Developmental Dynamics 236:271-281

Kobayashi T, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Guan G, Nagahama Y (2008) Sexual dimorphic expression of DMRT1 and Sox9a during gonadal differentiation and hormone-induced sex reversal in the teleost fish Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Developmental Dynamics 237:297-306

Kobayashi T, Matsuda M, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Suzuki A, Saito N, Nakamoto M, Shibata N, Nagahama Y (2004) Two DM domain genes, DMY and DMRT1, involved in testicular differentiation and development in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Developmental Dynamics 231:518-526

Kobayashi Y, Horiguchi R, Nozu R, Nakamura M (2010) Expression and localization of forkhead transcriptional factor 2 (Foxl2) in the gonads of protogynous wrasse, Halichoeres trimaculatus. Biology of Sex Differences 1(3):1-9

Kojima Y, Hayashi Y, Mizuno K, Sasaki S, Fukui Y, Koopman P, Morohashi K-I, Kohri K (2008) Up-regulation of SOX9 in human sex-determining region on the Y chromosome (SRY)- negative XX males. Clinical Endocrinology 68:791-799

Kondo M, Nanda I, Hornung U, Asakawa S, Shimizu N, Mitani H, Schmid M, Shima A, Schartl M (2003) Absence of the candidate male sex-determining gene dmrt1b(Y) of medaka from other fish species. Current Biology 13:416-420

Kwon JY, Haghpanah V, Kogson-Hurtado LM, McAndrew BJ, Penman DJ (2000) Masculinization of genetic female Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by dietary administration of aromatase inhibitor during sexual differentiation. Journal of Experimental Zoology 287:46-53

Kwon JY, McAndrew BJ, Penman DJ (2001) Cloning of brain aromatase gene and expression of brain and ovarian aromatase genes during sexual differentiation in genetic male and female Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Molecular Reproduction and Development 59:359-370

Lee PS, King HR, Pankhurst NW (2003) A comparison of aromatase inhibitors for the sex reversal of female Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 28:159- 160

25

Li G-L, Liu X-C, Zhang Y, Lin H-R (2006) Gonadal development, aromatase activity and P450 aromatase gene expression during sex inversion of protogynous red-spotted grouper Epinephelus akaara (Temminck and Schlegel) after implantation of the aromatase inhibitor, fadrozole. Aquaculture Research 37:484-491

Lindsey CC (1962) Experimental study of meristic variation in a population of threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 40:271-312

Liu M, Sadovy Y (2004) The influence of social factors on adult sex change and juvenile sexual differentiation in a diandric, protogynous epinepheline, Cephalopholis boenak (Pisces, Serranidae). Journal of Zoology 264:239-248

Liu ZH, Zhang YG, Wang DS (2010) Studies on feminization, sex determination, and differentiation of the Southern catfish, Silurus meridionalis—a review. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 36: 223-235

Loffler KA, Zarkower D, Koopman P (2003) Etiology of ovarian failure in blepharophimosis epicanthus inversus syndrome: FOXL2 is a conserved, early-acting gene in vertebrate ovarian development. Endocrinology 144(7):3237-3243

Luckenbach JA, Borski RJ, Daniels HV, Godwin J (2009) Sex determination in flatfishes: mechanisms and environmental influences. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20:256- 263

Luckenbach JA, Early LW, Rowe AH, Borski RJ, Daniels HV, Godwin J (2005) Aromatase cytochrome P450: cloning, intron variation, and ontogeny of gene expression in southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma). Journal of Experimental Zoology 303A:643-656

Luckenbach JA, Godwin J, Daniels HV, Borski RJ (2003) Gonadal differentiation and effects of temperature on sex determination in southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma). Aquaculture 216:315-327

Lymer D, Funge-Smith S, Miao W (2010) Status and potential of fisheries and aquaculture in Asia and the Pacific. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. RAP Publication 85pp

Mankiewicz JL, Godwin J, Holler BL, Turner PM, Murashige R, Shamey R, Daniels HV, Borski RJ (2013) Masculinizing effect of background color and cortisol in a flatfish with environmental sex-determination. Integrative and Comparative Biology 53(4):755-765

Manolakou P, Lavranos G, Angelopoulou R (2006) Molecular patterns of sex determination in the animal kingdom: a comparative study of the biology of reproduction. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 4(59):1-23

Marchand O, Govoroun M, D’Cotta H, McMeel O, Lareyre J-J, Bernot A, Laudet V, Guiguen Y (2000) DMRT1 expression during gonadal differentiation and spermatogenesis in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1493:180-187

26

Matsuda M, Nagahama Y, Shinomiya A, Sato T, Matsuda C, Kobayashi T, Morrey CE, Shibata N, Asakawa S, Shimizu N, Hori H, Hamaguchi S, Sakaizumi M (2002) DMY is a Y-specific DM-domain gene required for male development in the medaka fish. Nature 417:559-562

Matsuda M, Shinomiya A, Kinoshita M, Suzuki A, Kobayashi T, Bindhu P-P, Lau E, Hamaguchi S, Sakaizumi M, Nagahama Y (2007) DMY gene induces male development in genetically female (XX) medaka fish. PNAS 104(10):3865-3870

Ohmuro-Matsuyama Y, Matsuda M, Kobayashi T, Ikeuchi T, Nagahama Y (2003) Expression of DMY and DMRT1 in various tissues of the medaka (Oryzias latipes). Zoological Science 20:1395-1398

Middaugh DP, Hemmer MJ (1987) Influence of environmental temperature on sex-ratios in the tidewater silverside, Menidia peninsulae (Pisces: Atherinidae). Copeia 1987(4):958-964

Mittwoch U (1998) Phenotypic manifestations during the development of the dominant and default gonads in mammals and birds. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:466-471

Montalvo AJ, Faulk CK, Holt GJ (2012) Sex determination in southern flounder, Paralichthys lethostigma, from the Texas Gulf Coast. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 432-433:186-190

Moreno-Mendoza N, Torres-Maldonado L, Chimal-Monroy J, Harley V, Merchant-Larios H (2004) Disturbed expression of sox9 in pre-sertoli cells underlies sex-reversal in mice. Biology of Reproduction 70:114-122

Morse WW (1981) Reproduction of the summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus (L.). Journal of Fish Biology 19:189-203

Mylonas CC, Anezaki L, Divanach P, Zanuy S, Piferrer F, Ron B, Peduel A, Atie IB, Gorshkov S, Tandler A (2003) Influence of rearing temperature at two periods during early life on growth and sex differentiation of two strains of European sea bass. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 28:167-168

Nakamoto M, Matsuda M, Wang D-S, Nagahama Y, Shibata N (2006) Molecular cloning and analysis of gonadal expression of Foxl2 in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Biochemical Research Communications 344:353-361

Nakamura M, Kobayashi T, Chang X-T, Nagahama Y (1998) Gonadal sex differentiation in teleost fish. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:362-372

Navarro-Martín L, Viñas J, Ribas L, Díaz N, Gutiérrez A, Croce LD, Piferrer F (2011) DNA methylation of the gonadal aromatase (cyp19a) promoter is involved in temperature-dependent sex ratio shifts in the European sea bass. PLoS Genetics 7(12):1-15

27

NOAA FishWatch (2014) U.S Seafood Facts Aquaculture. http://www.fishwatch.gov/farmed_seafood/in_the_us.htm

NOAA FishWatch (2014) U.S. Seafood Facts Atlantic Salmon. http://www.fishwatch.gov/seafood_profiles/species/salmon/species_pages/atlantic_salmon.htm

NOAA FishWatch (2014) U.S. Seafood Facts Summer Flounder. http://www.fishwatch.gov/seafood_profiles/species/flounder/species_pages/summer_flounder.ht m

Ospina-Álvarez N, Piferrer F (2008) Temperature-dependent sex determination in fish revisited: Prevalence, a single sex ratio response pattern, and possible effects of climate change. PLoS ONE 3(7):1-11

Packer DB, Griesbach SJ, Berrien, PL, Zetlin CA, Johnson DL, Morse WW (1999) Essential fish habitat source document: Summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus life history and habitat characteristics. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-151

Pannetier M, Fabre S, Batista F, Kocer A, Renault L, Jolivet G, Mandon-Pepín B, Cotinot C, Veitia R, Pailhoux E (2006) FOXL2 activates P450 aromatase gene transcription: towards a better characterization of the early steps of mammalian ovarian development. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 36:399-413

Piferrer F (2001) Endocrine sex control strategies for the feminization of teleost fish. Aquaculture 197:229-281

Powell EN, Morson J (2008) Analysis of trends in sex ratio, implications for natural mortality, and variation in age length keys in summer flounder. 47th SAW Assessment Report 117-183

Prevedelli D, Simonini R (2000) Effects of salinity and two food regimes on survival, fecundity and sex ratio in two groups of Dinophilus gyrociliatus (Polychaeta: Dinophilidae). Marine Biology 137:23-29

Raymond CS, Murphy MW, O’Sullivan MG, Bardwell VJ, Zarkower D (2000) Dmrt1, a gene related to worm and fly sexual regulators, is required for mammalian testis differentiation. Genes & Development 14:2587-2595

Rhein M, Rintoul SR, Aoki S, Campos E, Chambers D, Feely RA, Gulev S, Johnson GC, Josey SA, Kostianoy A, Mauritzen C, Roemmich D, Talley LD, Wang F (2013) Observations: Ocean in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

28

Rodríguez-Marí A, Yan Y-L, BreMiller RA, Wilson C, Cañestro C, Postlethwait JH (2005) Characterization and expression pattern of zebrafish anti-Müllerian hormone (amh) relative sox9a, sox9b, and cyp19a1a, during gonad development. Gene Expression Patterns 5:655-667

Römer U, Beisenherz W (1996) Environmental determination of sex in Apistogramma (Cichlidae) and two other freshwater fishes (Teleostei). Journal of Fish Biology 48:714-725

Saillant E, Fostier A, Haffray P, Menu B, Chatain B (2003) Saline preferendum for the European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax, larvae and juveniles: effect of salinity on early development and sex determination. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 287:103-117

Schultz RJ (1993) Genetic regulation of temperature-mediated sex ratios in the livebearing fish Poeciliopsis lucida. Copeia 4:1148-1151

Shen Z, Wang H (2014) Molecular players involved in temperature-dependent sex determination and sex differentiation in teleost fish. Genetics Selection Evolution 46(26):1-21

Short RV (1998) Difference between a testis and an ovary. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:359-361

Siegfried KR (2010) In search of determinants: gene expression during gonadal sex differentiation. Journal of Fish Biology 76:1879-1902

Simpson ER, Mahendroo MS, Means GD, Kilgore MW, Hinshelwood MM, Graham-Lorence S, Amarneh B, Ito Y, Fisher CR, Michael MD, Mendelson CR, Bulun SE (1994) Aromatase cytochrome P450, the enzyme responsible for estrogen biosynthesis. Endocrine Reviews 15(3):342-355

Smith CA, Roeszler KN, Ohnesorg T, Cummins DM, Farlie PG, Doran TJ, Sinclair AH (2009) The avian Z-linked gene DMRT1 is required for male sex determination in the chicken. Nature 461:267-271

Smith EK, Guzmán JM, Luckenbach JA (2013) Molecular cloning, characterization, and sexually dimorphic expression of five major sex differentiation-related genes in a Scorpaeniform fish, sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part B 165:125-137

Smith TM, Reynolds RW (2004) Improved extended reconstruction of SST (1854-1997). Journal of Climate 17:2466-2477

Spotila LD, Spotila JR, Hall SE (1998) Sequence and expression analysis of WT1 and Sox9 in the red-eared slider turtle, Trachemys scripta. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:417-427

Strüssmann CA, Nakamura M (2002) Morphology, endocrinology, and environmental modulation of gonadal sex differentiation in teleost fishes. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 26:13-29

29

Sullivan JA, Schultz RJ (1986) Genetic and environmental basis of variable sex ratios in laboratory strains of Poeciliopsis lucida. Evolution 40(1):152-158

Suzuki A, Tanaka M, Shibata N (2004) Expression of aromatase mRNA and effects of aromatase inhibitor during ovarian development in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Journal of Experimental Zoology 301A:266-273

Swain A, Lovell-Badge R (1999) Mammalian sex determination: a molecular drama. Genes & Development 13:755-767

Tchoudokova A, Callard GV (1998) Identification of multiple CYP19 genes encoding different cytochrome P450 aromatase isozomes in brain and ovary. Endocrinology 139(4): 2179-2189

Uchida D, Yamashita M, Kitano T, Iguchi T (2004) An aromatase inhibitor or high water temperature induce oocyte apoptosis and depletion of P450 aromatase activity in the gonads of genetic female zebrafish during sex-reversal. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 137:11-20

Van Voorhees D, Lowther A (2012) Fisheries of the United States. NOAA Current Fisheries Statistics 2012

Viets BE, Ewert MA, Talent LG, Nelson CE (1994) Sex-determining mechanisms in squamate reptiles. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 270:45-56

Wang D, Kobayashi T, Zhou L, Nagahama Y (2004) Molecular cloning and gene expression of Foxl2 in the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 320:83-89

Wang D, Kobayashi T, Zhou L, Paul-Prasanth B, Ijiri S, Sakai F, Okubo K, Morohashi K, Nagahama Y (2007) Foxl2 up-regulates aromatase gene transcription in a female-specific manner by binding to the promoter as well as interacting with ad4 binding protein/. Molecular Endocrinology 21(3):712-725

Wang D, Zhou L, Kobayashi T, Matsuda M, Shibata Y, Sakai F, Nagahama Y (2010) Doublesex and mab-3-related transcription factor-1 repression of aromatase transcription, a possible mechanism favoring the male pathway in tilapia. Endocrinology 151(3):1331-1340 Waters PD, Wallis MC, Marshall-Graves JA (2007) Mammalian sex-origin and evolution of the Y chromosome and SRY. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 18:389-400

Wen AY, You F, Sun P, Li J, Xu DD, Wu ZH, Ma DY, Zhang PJ (2014) CpG methylation of dmrt1 and cyp19a promoters in relation to their sexual dimorphic expression in the Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Journal of Fish Biology 84:193-205

Werck-Reichhart D, Feyereisen R (2000) Cytochromes P450: a success story. Genome Biology 1(6):3003.1-3003.9

30

Western PS, Harry JL, Marshall-Graves JAM, Sinclair AH (1999) Temperature-dependent sex determination in the American alligator: AMH precedes SOX9 expression. Developmental Dynamics 216:411-419 Wibbels T, Bull JJ, Crews D (1994) Temperature-dependent sex determination: a mechanistic approach. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 270: 71-78

Wibbels T, Cowan J, LeBoeuf R (1998) Temperature-dependent sex determination in the red eared slider turtle, Trachemys scripta. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 281:409-416

Xia W, Zhou L, Yao B, Li C-J, Gui J-F (2007) Differential and spermatogenic cell-specific expression of DMRT1 during sex reversal in the protogynous hermaphroditic groupers. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 263:156-172

Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi S, Hirai T, Kitano T (2007) Follicle-stimulating hormone signaling and Foxl2 are involved in transcriptional regulation of aromatase gene during gonadal sex differentiation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 359:935-940

Yamaguchi T, Yoshinaga N, Yazawa T, Gen K, Kitano T (2010) Cortisol is involved in temperature-dependent sex determination in Japanese flounder. Endocrinology 151(8):3900- 3908

Yamamoto T (1969) Sex differentiation. In Fish Physiology, Hoar WS, Randall DJ 7-175. Academic Press, New York

Yamamoto E (1999) Studies on sex-manipulation and production of cloned populations in hirame, Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck et Schlegel). Aquaculture 173:235-246

Yoshinaga N, Shiraishi E, Yamamoto T, Iguchi T, Abe A, Kitano T (2004) Sexually dimorphic expression of a teleost homologue of Müllerian inhibiting substance during gonadal sex differentiation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 322:508-513

Zhao J, Mak P, Tchoudakova A, Callard G, Chen S (2001) Different catalytic properties and inhibitor responses of the goldfish brain and ovary aromatase isozymes. General and Comparative Endocrinology 123:180-191

31

CHAPTER 2

THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON OVARIAN AROMATASE (CYP19A1A)

EXPRESSION AND SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER (PARALICHTHYS

DENTATUS)1

Introduction

Paralicthyd flounder species are cultured throughout the world, particularly in Asia where

Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) culture represents one of the most significant marine aquaculture industries (Bolasina et al. 2006). In the United States, considerable research has been conducted to develop protocols for summer (Paralichthys dentatus) and southern flounder (P. lethostigma) aquaculture, and limited commercial production has been occurring for over a decade, primarily in land-based, recirculating aquaculture systems (Bengtson 1999; Watanabe and Carroll 2001). While earlier research focused on fundamental aspects of aquaculture such as methods to improve spawning, larviculture, nutrition and health management, more recent studies have focused on improving juvenile growth (Watanabe and Carroll 2001; Gaylord et al.

2003).

Growth rate is a primary factor that determines the profitability of land-based flounder culture, and the costs of growing fish to market size must be reduced to offset high production costs associated with construction and operation of recirculating systems (King et al. 2001). All

Paralichthyd species studied to date exhibit sexually dimorphic growth, with females growing

1 Chapter 1 was submitted for publication by Catherine C. Caruso, Timothy S. Breton, and David L. Berlinsky, entitled, The effects of temperature on ovarian aromatase (cyp19a1a) expression and sex differentiation in summer flounder (Paralicthys dentatus).

32 faster and larger than males (Morse 1981; Yamamoto 1999; Daniels 2000; King et al. 2001;

Yoneda et al. 2007). A tremendous increase in growth performance can therefore be realized through production of monosex female populations, and Japanese flounder have been commercially produced by this method in Japan and Korea since 1990 and 1996, respectively

(Yamamoto 1999; Bai and Lee 2010).

Of the Paralicthyd species, the sex determining mechanisms are best known for Japanese flounder. This species, like many teleosts, exhibits genotypic sex determination (GSD), with homogametic (XX) females and heterogametic (XY) males (Tabata 1991; Yamamoto 1999;

Luckenbach et al. 2009). However, GSD can be overridden by environmental (temperature) effects in female Japanese flounder (genotypic sex determination + temperature effects; GSD +

TE), if fish are exposed to masculinizing temperatures during the sex-determining period of development (Kitano et al. 1999; Ospina-Álvarez and Piferrer 2008). Specifically, XX Japanese flounder will develop into phenotypic males if they are exposed to high (25-27.5°C) or low

(15°C) water temperatures during sex differentiation (Yamamoto 1999) and a similar system has been described for southern flounder (Luckenbach et al. 2003). Less is known about the mechanism or timing of sex determination in summer flounder, but previous studies have shown a propensity towards male differentiation when exposed to a wide range of temperatures (12-

21°C; Colburn et al. 2009; 2015).

A number of genes that code for transcription factors or enzymes involved in endocrine function are expressed during teleost sex determination (Luckenbach et al. 2005; Ijiri et al. 2008;

Mankiewicz et al. 2013; Smith et al. 2013). Of these, cyp19a1a is the most well-studied, and has been shown to play a role in the regulation of ovarian development. Cyp19a1a encodes for cytochrome P450 ovarian aromatase, a steroidogenic enzyme that converts testosterone into

33 estrogen (17β estradiol; E2; Kitano et al. 1999; Liu et al. 2010). A number of teleosts, including

Japanese flounder, exhibit sexually dimorphic cyp19a1a expression (Kitano et al. 1999; Wen et al. 2014), and in some species it has been established as a robust sex marker (Smith et al. 2013).

Cyp19a1a expression has also been shown to be influenced by water temperature and is likely responsible for GSD + TE sex determination in some species (Kitano et al. 1999; Yoshinaga et al. 2004; Hattori et al. 2007; Yamaguchi et al. 2007; Baroiller et al. 2009; Wen et al. 2014).

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the timing and magnitude of cyp19a, expression during sex differentiation in summer flounder reared at three experimental temperatures (13°C, 16°C and 19°C), and assess the sex ratios resulting from each temperature treatment. To accomplish this, partial summer flounder cDNA sequences for cyp19a1a and eef1α (a common reference gene), were identified and their expression patterns assessed using real time quantitative PCR.

Materials and methods

Broodstock culture and juvenile rearing

Summer flounder broodstock were captured from Rhode Island coastal waters and held at

GreatBay Aquaculture LLC (GBA; Portsmouth, NH) for at least two years prior to the start of the experiment. Fish were maintained in recirculating aquaculture systems (28-30 ppt salinity) equipped with biological and mechanical filtration, ultraviolet sterilization, foam fractionation, and photothermal control. Water quality within the culture tanks remained within ranges suitable for rearing this species (Watanabe et al. 1998). The fish were fed a commercial broodstock ration

(Breed-M, Inve, Salt Lake City, UT) to apparent satiation 2-3 times per week. Photoperiod and temperature were maintained at 12L: 12D and 19 + 1 °C until two months prior to spawning (~5 years, 1.3 kg), when they were adjusted to 8L: 16D and 14 °C (Watanabe et al. 1998; Bengtson

34

1999). To obtain ovarian tissue for partial cDNA identification, an adult female broodstock was euthanized via immersion in 200 mg/L tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222; Argent Chemical

Laboratories, Redmond, WA), and ovaries were immediately dissected, preserved in RNA

Later® Solution (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Grand Island, NY), and stored at -70°C for later RNA extractions.

Summer flounder broodstock were spawned at GBA, and larvae were raised to the beginning of metamorphosis in 800 L tanks in a recirculating system with filtered (10 µm) and

UV sterilized seawater (26-29 ppt) at 17-19°C. Larvae were fed supplemental microalgae

(Nanochloropsis sp., ~3x108/mL) until 14 days post hatch (DPH). Fish were fed rotifers,

Brachionus plicatilis, and brine shrimp, Artemia, nauplii during larval culture and weaned onto a commercial diet (Gemma Micro 300 µm; Skretting USA, Tooele, UT) by 34 DPH.

Juveniles (37 DPH) in various stages of metamorphosis (pelagic, symmetrical larvae to demersal juveniles; Packer et al. 1999) were transferred to the Aquaculture Research Center

(ARC) at the University of New Hampshire (UNH; Durham, NH), where they were maintained in three separate recirculating systems. Each system consisted of four replicate 235 L cylindrical tanks (400 fish/tank) equipped biological and mechanical filtration, ultraviolet sterilization, foam fractionation, photothermal control and temperature control. The three systems were maintained on a 12L: 12D photocycle (40 lx and 0 lx, respectively), with 30 minute crepuscular intervals (15 lx). Salinity and dissolved oxygen were monitored daily (OxyGuard Handy Gamma), along with pH (Ecosense® PH and temperature (Temp Pen, Pentair Aquatic Ecosystems, Apopka, FL).

Nitrates and total ammonia were monitored weekly (HACH®). Fish were fed an appropriately sized marine diet in excess (Skretting, USA).

Juvenile summer flounder sampling

35

To provide an initial assessment prior to exposure to different temperatures, fish at 38

DPH (n = 5 fish/system) were weighed on an analytical balance (Mettler Toledo International

Inc., Leicester, UK), and measured (standard length (mm); fish snout to tail base) using a digital caliper (Mitutoyo America, Aurora, IL). Due to small fish sizes, gonads could not be accurately dissected from each individual. Rather, heads and tails were removed using sterile razor blades, and gonadal regions were excised (Figure 3; Goto et al. 1999; Winkler et al. 2004), preserved in

RNA Later® Solution (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Grand Island, NY), and stored at -70°C for later RNA extractions. All fish were acclimated at 19°C for one week (38-44

DPH). Fish in one system were then maintained at 19°C, while the two other systems were slowly cooled (1°C/day) to reach final temperatures of 13 and 16°C. Fish from all three temperature treatments were sampled again as described above, after all experimental temperatures were attained (52 DPH, n = 4 fish/treatment). Fish (n = 9 fish/treatment) were sampled again at 66 DPH.

GR Figure 3. Juvenile summer flounder (38 DPH) sampled for cyp9a1a gene expression analyses. Dotted lines represent larval dissections made using razor blades to excise summer flounder gonads. Area indicated by the arrow represents the gonadal region (GR) that was preserved for later RNA extraction.

To further investigate juvenile growth and expression patterns during later development, additional fish from the 13 and 16°C treatments were sampled at 105, 133, and 171 DPH (n = 5,

8, or 9 fish/treatment). Due to overall slow growth in the 13°C treatment, an additional 12 fish were sampled at 191 DPH. All fish were weighed, measured, and gonadal regions were

36 removed. Additional muscle tissue in larger fish was trimmed from gonadal regions prior to preservation (RNA Later® Solution) and storage at -70°C. Fish from the 19°C treatment were not sampled after 66 DPH, due to relatively low numbers of fish in the replicate tanks, and the remainder were retained to determine temperature-dependent sex ratios.

Remaining fish were maintained at their respective temperatures until 217 DPH, at which point all treatments were slowly increased to 21°C over two weeks (<1°C/day), to both simulate spring temperatures and accelerate juvenile growout (Colburn et al. 2009, 2015). Summer flounder do not undergo morphological gonadal differentiation until late in juvenile development

(>150 mm total length (TL); Colburn et al. 2009; 2015). At this point, approximately 50 fish from each treatment were euthanized with MS-222 and gonads were visually assessed, to determine sex ratios (Colburn et al. 2015). Fish that could not be sexed visually were fixed in

10% formalin for 24 hours, and transferred to 70% ethanol for histological processing. Preserved samples were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5µm, stained with hemotoxylin and eosin, and examined under a compound light microscope (UNICO M250, UNICO, Dayton, NJ). Sex classification was based on gonad characteristics previously described (Nakamura et al. 1998;

Goto et al. 1999; Luckenbach et al. 2003). Fish with germ cells forming clusters in seminal lobules or gonads in various stages of spermatogenesis were designated as male. Fish with gonads with lamellate structure or clear oogonia were designated as female (Colburn et al. 2009).

Partial cDNA identification

Total RNA was extracted from adult summer flounder ovary tissue. Samples were removed from RNA Later® Solution, blotted on Whatman #1 filter paper (Whatman Inc.,

Sanford, ME), weighed and added to 500µL cold TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, Grand

Island, NY). The tissue was homogenized using microtubes and pestles (Fisher Scientific,

37

Pittsburgh, PA) and brought to 1000µL with TRIzol Reagent. RNA was extracted using standard phenol/chloroform techniques (Molecular Research Center, Cinncinati, OH). mRNA was extracted using 20 µg of the total RNA in an Ambion MicroPoly (A) Purist kit (Life

Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Synthesis of cDNA was performed using 500 µg mRNA and

Superscript III reverse transcriptase.

Gene-specific primers were designed to amplify 400-600 (bp) partial sequences for eef1α (eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha) and cyp19a1a (P450 aromatase) in polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Primer sets (Table 1) were designed in Geneious 4.7.6 (Biomatters Ltd.,

San Franscisco, CA) from consensus alignments of closely related fish species. The consensus sequence for eef1α was generated from coding domain sequence (cds) alignments of four teleost species including Paralichthys olivaceus (AB017183.1), Hippoglossus hippoglossus

(EU561357.1), Sparus aurata (AF184170.1) and Oreochromis niloticus (AB075952.1). The consensus sequence for cyp19a1a was generated from coding domain sequence (cds) alignments of Paralichthys olivaceus (AB017182.1), Hippoglossus hippoglossus (AJ410171.1), Oryzias latipes (D82968.1) and Sebastes schegelii (FJ594995.2).

Primers and ovarian cDNA were used in the Clontech Advantage 2 PCR kit (Clonetech

Laboratories Inc., Mountain View, CA), with 5µL template (1/100, 1/10), 20 µL total volumes

(Clonetech Laboratories Inc., Mountain View, CA), and standard thermocycling conditions

(95°C for 1 min, followed by 34 cycles of denaturing for 30 seconds at 95°C, annealing for 30 sec at 60°C and extension for 1 min at 68°C, and a 1-cycle final extension for 1 min at 68°C, then held at 4°C). PCR products were electrophoresed in a 2% agarose gel, and bands at the expected base pair (bp) size were excised from the gel. PCR products were extracted from agarose gels using a QIAGEN Qiaex II gel extraction kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). PCR

38 products were sequenced at the UNH Hubbard Center for Genome Studies using the dideoxy chain termination method in an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster

City, CA), with the forward and reverse primer for each gene. Chromatograms were quality trimmed and analyzed using: 1) Blastn against NCBI general nucleotide database and 2) Blastx against NCBI protein database (n/r).

RNA extractions and cDNA synthesis of juvenile samples

Juvenile summer flounder gonadal regions were used in RNA extractions, using similar techniques as described above. RNA was quantified using an ND 1000 NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE). For each sample, 2.5 µg RNA was treated with 2.5µL DNase, and reverse transcribed into cDNA using 2.5 μM oligo dT primer

(20mer), and 200 units of SuperScript III reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Juvenile summer flounder cDNA was stored at -20°C prior to relative quantification with real time quantitative PCR.

Real-Time Quantitative PCR (QPCR)

Eef1α and cyp19a1a primer sets for QPCR were designed in NCBI Primer-Blast to amplify 80-150 bp fragments (Table 1). Relative quantification SyberGreenER QPCR

(Invitrogen) assays were performed using an ABI 7500 Fast System (Applied Biosystems, Foster

City, CA) with 1000 nM primer concentrations and standard cycling conditions (50°C for 2 min,

95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min), followed by dissociation curve analysis. Samples were performed in duplicate (1/10 dilution). Triplicate relative standard curves (1/5-1/640) were generated from dilutions of pooled cDNA from eight individuals per gene. Optimized assays consisted of eight point linear standard curves with approximately 100-

110% PCR efficiency. Standard QPCR negative controls (no template and no reverse

39

transcriptase) were performed in duplicate for each assay and exhibited no contamination <10 Ct

from samples (Luckenbach et al. 2009). Both gene assays displayed a single peak in dissociation

curve analysis.

Table 1. GenBank accession numbers, primer sequences and product sizes (bp) for partial cds identification and QPCR assays, with percent efficiency (% eff) and mean cycle threshold (Ct) values for QPCR assays. Mean Ct values refer to the mean 1/10 diluted standard curve point for each assay. Higher Ct values indicate lower mRNA abundance.

Gene symbol GenBank 5’-Forward primer-3’ % eff Ct bp acc. no. 5’-Reverse primer-3’

Partial cds identification eef1α KR061538 GCCGAGCGTGAGCGTGGTAT -- -- 471 ACCCTCCTTGCGCTCAACCT

cyp19a1a KR061539 CCACCAGAGGCACAAGGCGG -- -- 540 TTGCCAACGCAGGAGCGAGG QPCR assays eef1α -- AGCAGCTCATCGTTGGAGTC 100.6 16.5 141 TGGGGACGAAAGCAACACTT

cyp19a1a -- CACCGCACAGAGTTTTTCCG 106.1 28.4 95 CCTGAACCGAATGGCTGGAA

Statistical Analysis

Fisher-Exact tests were run to determine if male:female ratios of fish grown to > 150 mm

differed significantly by temperature treatment. Pairwise comparisons were Bonferroni-corrected

(p<0.017) and used to assess which temperature treatments were significantly different. PCR

results were analyzed using the Pfaffl method for relative quantification (Pfaffl 2001). Individual

expression levels of cyp19a1a were calibrated to the 38 DPH (initial) group mean and then

normalized to eef1α, to compensate for differences in cDNA synthesis efficiency among

samples. All data were evaluated for normality and heteroscedasticity prior to analysis. Relative

expression values were normalized to the 38 DPH (initial) group mean and log-transformed prior

to analyses to satisfy assumptions of equal variance among groups. One-way analyses of 40 variance (ANOVAs) were conducted in JMP Pro 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) to assess significant differences in cyp19a1a expression and fish growth (p<0.05). Each ANOVA was followed by a Tukey's HSD means separation test to identify pairwise significant differences. All numerical data are represented as the mean ± standard error. To identify correlations between fish size and cyp19a1a expression, linear regression analyses were performed in JMP Pro 11.

Results

Partial cDNA fragments

The 471 bp fragment corresponding to eef1α exhibited high nucleotide sequence identity with other teleost species, including Paralichthys lethostigma (99%), Paralichthys olivaceus

(99%) and Hippoglossus hippoglossus (95%). The translated protein sequence exhibited high identity match with Paralichthys lethostigma (99%), Paralichthys olivaceus (99%) and

Hippoglossus hippoglossus (96%). The 540 bp fragment corresponding to cyp19a1a was quality trimmed from the expected fragment size (597 bp). It exhibited high nucleotide sequence identity with other teleost species including Paralichthys lethostigma (98%), Paralichthys olivaceus

(98%), Verasper moseri (96%) and Hippoglossus hippoglossus (95%). The translated protein sequence exhibited high identity match with Paralichthys lethostigma (98%), Paralichthys olivaceus (98%) Verasper moseri (95%) and Hippoglossus hippoglossus (94%). The eef1α and cyp19a1a partial cDNA fragments were both submitted to the NCBI GenBank database

(KR061538 and KR061539, respectively).

Cyp19a1a expression during juvenile development

Most juvenile flounder at 38, 52 and 66 DPH exhibited overall stable cyp19a1a expression, except for those reared at 19°C at 52 DPH, which significantly decreased in expression (4.5 fold; p = 0.0016; Figure 4A). At 52 DPH, fish acclimated to 13°C exhibited

41 significantly higher (6 fold) expression than fish reared at 19°C. After the growth period, the final sex ratios differed by temperature treatment, and largely mirrored differences in cyp19a1a expression present at 52 DPH (Figure 4B). Significantly more females were produced at the low

(13°C) and intermediate (16°C) temperature regimes (females = 26.9 and 17.6% respectively) than at the high (19°C) temperature regime (females = 0%; p<0.0001), but there was no

significant difference in the percentage of females in the 13°C and 16°C treatments.

A A A A A

mRNA expression mRNA A AB

cyp19a1a B

Relative Age (days post hatch) B A A B

Percent (%)

Temperature (°C) Figure 4. (A) Relative cyp19a1a mRNA abundances, normalized to eef1α, during early juvenile development at initial sampling (38 DPH, 19°C), and at 52 and 66 DPH (13, 16 and 19°C). Each bar represents the mean + standard error. (B) Summer flounder sex ratios determined after temperature treatments (44-217 DPH) and growout period (21°C, >150 mm total length). Sex was assessed by visual examination during gonadal dissection or histology. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments and ages (p < 0.05).

42

Juvenile summer flounder reared at 16°C exhibited significantly greater growth than those at 13°C by 133 DPH (Figure 5A). In contrast, flounder reared at 16°C exhibited lower cyp19a1a levels at 105 and 171 DPH (p = 0.0288 and 0.0419, respectively; Figure 5B). In both

13 and 16°C temperature treatments, aromatase expression largely decreased after 66 DPH, and an inverse relationship was evident between cyp19a1a expression and fish size (p < 0.0001;

Figure 5C). A B

***

**

cyp19a1a

* * mRNA expression

Relative Standard length Standard(mm) length

Age (days post hatch) C

expression)

cyp19a1a

Log (relative Log (relative Standard length (mm)

Figure 5. Summer flounder (A) growth and (B) relative cyp19a1a mRNA abundances (normalized to eef1α) during juvenile development at 13 and 16°C (38-191 DPH). Asterisks denote significant differences between treatments (*p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). (C) Relationship between relative cyp19a1a mRNA abundance (logarithmic scale) and standard lengths (mm) of fish raised at 13 (p < 0.0001) and 16°C (p < 0.0001).

43

Discussion

The process of sex determination in fishes is highly variable among species and may be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors (Devlin and Nagahama 2002). In mammals, the presence of the Sry gene on the Y chromosome generally results in formation of testes, but the sex-determining gene(s) in females are less well understood (Waters et al. 2007).

In teleosts, the sex determining genes remain largely unknown, and vary widely in the few species in which they have been identified, such as the medaka (Oryzias latipes; dmy), the

Patagonian pejerrey (Odontesthes hatcheri; amhy), Oryzias luzonensis (Gsdf), fugu (amhr2) and rainbow trout (Oncorhychus mykiss; sdY) (Kobayashi et al. 2004; Kikuchi and Hamaguchi 2013).

More research has focused on downstream genes involved in sex differentiation including cyp19a1a, foxl2, dmrt1 and amh (Luckenbach et al. 2005; Nakamoto et al. 2006; Ijiri et al. 2008;

Herpin and Schartl 2011; Smith et al. 2013). Cyp19a1a, in particular, plays a pivotal role in teleost sex determination, and relatively high or low expression occurs during female and male sex differentiation, respectively (Kitano et al. 1999; Kitano et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2003;

Luckenbach et al. 2005). During the critical period of sex differentiation, several factors, including water temperature, can influence cyp19a1a expression levels, and therefore the resulting phenotypic sex of the developing fish (Kitano et al. 1999; Kitano et al. 2000; Lee et al.

2003; Luckenbach et al. 2005). Stress can also affect expression levels, as seen in studies on

Japanese and southern flounder where increased cortisol in response to temperature and culture conditions suppressed cyp19a expression, and led to higher proportions of male individuals

(Yamaguchi et al. 2010; Mankiewicz et al. 2013). A recent study on European sea bass found that higher water temperatures increased methylation of a cyp19a1a promoter, which suppressed expression and resulted in masculinization of genotypic females (Navarro-Martín et al. 2011). A

44 similar result was achieved in Japanese flounder, where high levels of cyp19a1a promotor methylation correlated with low expression in testes, while no methylation and high cyp19a1a expression occurred in ovarian tissue (Wen et al. 2014). In the present study, more female summer flounder resulted from culture at lower temperatures, but the proportion was low overall among treatments (0-26.9%). These results are similar to those of previous studies with cultured summer flounder where high male differentiation occurred, even in meiogynogenetic individuals

(Colburn et al. 2009; 2015). Male-skewed sex ratios have also been reported in wild populations, but it is not known if this was due to sampling biases or differential mortality rates (Powell and

Morson 2008).

Japanese flounder, the most well studied Paralichthyd, have a confirmed XX/XY chromosomal system that is influenced by water temperature (GSD+TE). They exhibit a U- shaped pattern of sex differentiation where intermediate temperatures (20°C) produce a 1:1 sex ratio that aligns with chromosomal sex, while high (25-27.5°C) and low (15°C) temperatures cause sex-reversal of genotypic females, resulting in male-dominated populations (Kitano et al.

1999; Yamamoto et al. 1999; Ospina-Álvarez and Piferrer 2008). The system of sex differentiation in southern flounder is less clear. A chromosomal system has not been confirmed, but one study on Atlantic coast fish (NC) found a U-shaped pattern of temperature-influenced sex differentiation similar to that of Japanese flounder (Luckenbach et al. 2003). Research on fish from the Texas Gulf Coast found that the proportion of females decreased with increasing water temperatures, similar to the differentiation pattern in summer flounder (Montalvo et al.

2012). These differences may be explained by adaptive variation due to geographical differences between southern flounder populations, but additional research is necessary before either summer or southern flounder can be definitively classified as GSD+TE. It is possible that

45 summer flounder do not produce a balanced sex ratio because they possess a sex differentiation system that differs fundamentally from that of Japanese flounder. Such differences have been established in other congeneric teleost species (e.g. XX/XY vs. ZZ/ZW; Oreochromis, Mystus,

Clarias; Devlin and Nagahama 2002), and even between subpopulations within a species

(Penman and Piferrer 2008).

Japanese and southern flounder both undergo sex differentiation well after metamorphosis, but differ in their timing. Japanese flounder metamorphose at ~17.5 mm TL (25-

30 DPH; Fukuhara 1986) and undergo sex differentiation at 32 mm TL, when sexually dimorphic cyp19a1a expression occurs (Kitano et al. 1999). Southern flounder metamorphose at a comparable age and size (~30-45 DPH; 10-16 mm TL; Daniels et al. 1996; 2000), but do not initiate sex differentiation until ~65 mm TL (Luckenbach et al. 2005). While summer flounder also metamorphose at a similar age and size (13 mm TL; 39 DPH; Gavlik et al. 2002), it is possible that they undergo sex differentiation earlier than congenerics. At the onset of the present study, the treatment fish were a combination of pelagic larvae, and settled, post-metamorphic juveniles (~14 mm TL; 37 DPH). Fourteen days later, after brief exposure to experimental temperature treatments (~15 mm TL; 52 DPH), fish exhibited differential cyp19a1a expression by treatment, and this may correspond to the window of sex determination in this species. Fish reared at a temperature known to produce all male populations (19° C; Colburn et al. 2015) exhibited a decrease in cyp19a1a expression, while female-producing temperatures (13 and

16°C) exhibited stable expression. This contrasts with other Paralichthyd species where males exhibit stable expression, and females demonstrate elevated cyp19a1a levels (Luckenbach et al.

2005; Smith et al. 2013). The 13° C treatment, however, only produced 26.9% females, and mean expression levels at 13 and 16°C likely reflect high proportional contributions of male cyp19a1a

46 expression. Conditions that may produce higher proportions of females could result in dramatic increases in mean cyp19a1a expression, similar to that of other Paralichthyd species. By 66

DPH, expression levels in fish reared at 19° C increased to levels similar to other treatments, and expression levels in the 13 and 16° C treatments largely decreased with increasing fish size.

There was no clear sexual dimorphic cyp19a1a expression at the ages and sizes where sex- specific gene expression differences occur in other Paralichthyds (Kitano et al. 1999;

Luckenbach et al. 2005). Therefore, the window of sex determination in this species (~15 mm

TL; 52 DPH) appears to be earlier than that of congenerics, and may occur at or soon after metamorphosis. The apparent increase in cyp19a1a expression in the male-producing temperature (19°C) after 52 DPH contrasts with patterns in other Paralichthyds, where male expression remains low throughout juvenile development (Kitano et al. 1999; Luckenbach et al.

2005). These expression increases in male juvenile summer flounder may indicate that estrogens are involved in testicular differentiation, as in black porgy (Acanthopagrus schlegelii) and rainbow trout (Wu et al. 2010; Delalande et al. 2015). Therefore, in summer flounder, sex- specific differences in cyp19a1a during early gonadal development may be limited to a temporally short window of sex determination.

The relatively small cyp19a1a expressional changes observed in this study may have resulted from the use of gonadal regions in RNA extractions, which included non-gonadal tissues, and likely reduced gonad-specific expression patterns. The inverse relationship between cyp19a1a expression and fish size may also reflect the relative contribution of non-gonadal tissue as the fish grew. A more accurate assessment of expressional changes during juvenile summer flounder development may require gonadal micro-dissection, if possible, from early developmental stages, including pre-metamorphosis.

47

In conclusion, the conditions necessary to produce a balanced sex ratio were not obtained in this study, and predominantly male phenotypes resulted from the experimental culture temperatures employed. Summer flounder may need to be exposed to temperature regimes earlier than congenerics to promote female differentiation. Differential cyp19a1a expression patterns were observed at ~15 mm TL (52 DPH) which may correspond to the window of sex determination in this species. Additional research is necessary to fully evaluate gonadal cyp19a1a expression patterns, and other genes involved in sex differentiation, during early development in this species.

Literature Cited

Bai, S. Lee, S. (2010) Culture of olive flounder: Korean perspective. In: Practical Flatfish Culture and Stock Enhancement. Harry V. Daniels and Wade O. Watanabe, Eds. Wiley- Blackwell. Ames, Iowa, USA

Baroiller JF, D’Cotta H, Saillant E (2009) Environmental effects on fish sex determination and differentiation. Sexual Development 3:118-135

Bengtson DA (1999) Aquaculture of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus): Status of knowledge, current research and future priorities. Aquaculture 176:39-49

Bolasina S, Tagawa M, Yamashita Y, Tanaka M (2006) Effect of stocking density on growth, digestive enzyme activity and cortisol level in larvae and juveniles of Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture 259:432-443

Colburn HR, Breton TS, Nardi GC, Berlinsky DL (2015) Sex differentiation of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus L.) raised at practical hatchery temperatures. Aquaculture Research 46:1188-1196

Colburn HR, Nardi GC, Borski RJ, Berlisnky DL (2009) Induced meiotic gynogenesis and sex differentiation in summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus). Aquaculture 289:175-180

Daniels HV (2000) Species profile: Southern flounder. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Publication No. 726

48

Daniels HV, Berlinsky DL, Hodson RG, Sullivan CV (1996) Effects of stocking density, salinity, and light intensity on growth and survival of southern flounder Paralichthys lethostigma larvae. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 27(2):153-159

Delalande C, Goupil A, Lareyre J, Le Gac F (2015) Differential expression patterns of three aromatase genes and of four estrogen receptors genes in the testes of trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Molecular Reporduction & Development 1-15

Devlin RH, Nagahama Y (2002) Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: An overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208:191-364

Fukuhara O (1986) Morphological and functional development of Japanese flounder in early life stage. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 52(1):81-91

Gavlik S, Albino M, Specker JL (2002) Metamorphosis in summer flounder: manipulation of thyroid status to synchronize settling behavior, growth and development. Aquaculture 203:359- 373

Gavlik S, Specker JL (2004) Metamorphosis in summer flounder: manipulation of rearing salinity to synchronize settling behavior, growth and development. Aquaculture 240:543-559

Gaylord TG, Schwarz MH, Cool RW, Jahncke ML, Craig SR (2003) Thermal optima for the culture of juvenile summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus. Journal of Applied Aquaculture 14(3/4):155-162

Goto R, Mori T, Kawamata K, Matsubara T, Mizuno S, Adachi S, Yamauchi K (1999) Effects of temperature on gonadal sex determination in barfin flounder Verasper moseri. Fisheries Science 65(6):884-887

Hattori RS, Gould RJ, Fujioka T, Saito T, Kurita J, Strussmann CA, Yokota M, Watanabe S (2007) Temperature-dependent sex determination in the Hd-rR medaka Oryzias latipes: gender sensitivity, thermal threshold, critical period, and DMRT1 expression profile. Sexual Development 1:138-146

Herpin A, Schartl M (2011) Dmrt1 genes at the crossroads: A widespread and central class of sexual development factors in fish. FEBS Journal 278:1010-1019

Ijiri S, Kaneko H, Kobayashi T, Wang D-S, Sakai F, Paul-Prasanth B, Nakamura M, Nagahama Y (2008) Sexual dimorphic expression of genes in gonads during early differentiation of a teleost fish, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Biology of Reproduction 78:333-341

49

King NJ, Nardi GC, Jones CJ (2001) Sex-linked growth divergence of summer flounder from a commercial farm: are males worth the effort? Journal of Applied Aquaculture 11(1/2):77-88

Kitano T, Takamune K, Nagahama Y, Abe S-I (2000) Aromatase inhibitor and 17α- methyltestosterone cause sex reversal from genetical females to phenotypic males and suppression of P450 aromatase gene expression in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Molecular Reproduction and Development 56:1-5

Kitano T, Takahume K, Kobayashi T, Nagahama Y, Abe S-I (1999) Supression of P450 aromatase gene expression in sex-reversed males produced by rearing genetically female larvae at a high water temperature during a period of sex differentiation in the Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 23:167-176

Kobayashi T, Matsuda M, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Suzuki A, Saito N, Nakamoto M, Shibata N, Nagahama Y (2004) Two DM domain genes, DMY and dmrt1, involved in testicular differentiation and development in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Developmental Dynamics 231:518-526

Lee PS, King HR, Pankhurst NW (2003) A comparison of aromatase inhibitors for the sex reversal of female Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 28:159- 160

Liu ZH, Zhang YG, Wang DS (2010) Studies on feminization, sex determination, and differentiation of the Southern catfish, Silurus meridionalis—a review. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 36: 223-235

Luckenbach JA, Borski RJ, Daniels HV, Godwin J (2009) Sex determination in flatfishes: Mechanisms and environmental influences. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20:256- 263

Luckenbach JA, Early LW, Rowe AH, Borski RJ, Daniels HV, Godwin J (2005) Aromatase Cytochrome P450: cloning, intron variation, and ontogeny of gene expression in southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma). Journal of Experimental Zoology 303A:643-656

Luckenbach JA, Godwin J, Daniels HV, Borski RJ (2003) Gonadal differentiation and effects of temperature on sex determination in southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma). Aquaculture 216:315-327

50

Mankiewicz JL, Godwin J, Holler BL, Turner PM, Murashige R, Shamey R, Daniels HV, Borski RJ (2013) Masculinizing effect of background color and cortisol in a flatfish with environmental sex-determination. Integrative and Comparative Biology 53(4):755-765

Montalvo AJ, Faulk CK, Holt GJ (2012) Sex determination in southern flounder, Paralichthys lethostigma, from the Texas Gulf Coast. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 432-433:186-190

Morse WW (1981) Reproduction of the summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus (L.). Journal of Fish Biology 19:189-203

Nakamoto M, Matsuda M, Wang D-S, Nagahama Y, Shibata N (2006) Molecular cloning and analysis of gonadal expression of Foxl2 in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Biochemical Research Communications 344:353-361

Navarro-Martín L, Viñas J, Ribas L, Díaz N, Gutiérrez A, Croce LD, Piferrer F (2011) DNA methylation of the gonadal aromatase (cyp19a) promoter is involved in temperature-dependent sex ratio shifts in the European sea bass. PLoS Genetics 7(12):1-15

Ospina-Álvarez N, Piferrer F (2008) Temperature-dependent sex determination in fish revisited: Prevalence, a single sex ratio response pattern, and possible effects of climate change. PLoS ONE 3(7):1-11

Packer DB, Griesbach SJ, Berrien, PL, Zetlin CA, Johnson DL, Morse WW (1999) Essential fish habitat source document: Summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus life history and habitat characteristics. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-151

Penman DJ, Piferrer F (2008) Fish gonadogenesis. Part 1: Genetic and environmental mechanisms of sex determination. Reviews in Fisheries Sicence 16(61):14-32

Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT—PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29(900): 2002-2007

Powell EN, Morson J (2008) Analysis of trends in sex ratio, implications for natural mortality, and variation in age length keys in summer flounder. 47th SAW Assessment Report 117-183

Smith EK, Guzmán JM, Luckenbach JA (2013) Molecular cloning, characterization, and sexually dimorphic expression of five major sex differentiation-related genes in a Scorpaeniform fish, sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part B 165:125-137

51

Tabata K (1991) Induction of gynogenetic diploid males and presumption of sex determination mechanisms in the hirame Paralichthys olivaceus. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57(5):845-850

Watanabe WO, Carroll PM (2001) Progress in controlled breeding of summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus, and Southern flounder, P. lethostigma. Journal of Applied Aquaculture 11(1/2):89-111

Watanabe WO, Ellis EP, Ellis SC (1998) Progress in controlled maturation and spawning of summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus broodstock. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 29(4):393-404

Waters PD, Wallis MC, Marshall-Graves JA (2007) Mammalian sex-origin and evolution of the Y chromosome and SRY. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 18:389-400

Winkler C, Hornung U, Kondo M, Neuner C, Duschl J, Shima A, Shartl M (2004) Developmentally regulated and non-sex-specific expression of the autosomal dmrt genes in the embryo of the Medaka fish (Oryzias latipes). Mechanisms of Development 121:997-1005

Wen AY, You F, Sun P, Li J, Xu DD, Wu ZH, Ma DY, Zhang PJ (2014) CpG methylation of dmrt1 and cyp19a promoters in relation to their sexual dimorphic expression in the Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Journal of Fish Biology 84:193-205

Wu G, Tomy S, Lee M, Lee Y, Yueh W, Lin C, Lau E, Chang C (2010) Sex differentiation and sex change in the protandrous black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli. General and Comparative Endocrinology 167:417-421

Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi S, Hirai T, Kitano T (2007) Follicle-stimulating hormone signaling and Foxl2 are involved in transcriptional regulation of aromatase gene during gonadal sex differentiation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 359:935-940

Yamaguchi T, Yoshinaga N, Yazawa T, Gen K, Kitano T (2010) Cortisol is involved in temperature-dependent sex determination in Japanese flounder. Endocrinology 151(8):3900- 3908

Yamamoto E (1999) Studies on sex-manipulation and production of cloned populations in hirame, Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck et Schlegel). Aquaculture 173:235-246

Yoneda M, Kurita Y, Kitagawa D, Ito M, Tomiyama T, Goto T, Takahashi K (2007) Age validation and growth variability of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus off the Pacific coast of northern Japan. Fisheries Science 73:585-592

52

Yoshinaga N, Shiraishi E, Yamamoto T, Iguchi T, Abe A, Kitano T (2004) Sexually dimorphic expression of a teleost homologue of Müllerian inhibiting substance during gonadal sex differentiation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 322:508-513

53

CHAPTER 3

PRELIMINARY INGESTIGATIONS INTO FOXL2, DMRT1 AND AMH EXPRESSION

DURING SEX DIFFERENTIATION IN SUMMER FLOUNDER (PARALICHTHYS

DENTATUS)

Introduction

Previous studies on Paralichthyds including Japanese, southern, and summer flounder have established a critical period during juvenile development when sex determination is sensitive to temperature effects (Kitano et al. 1999; Luckenbach et al. 2003). There are a number of genes that play a role in sex determination in fishes by producing hormones, enzymes and transcription factors involved in male or female development. Cyp19a1a, the most well studied, was investigated in summer flounder in Chapter 2, but others including foxl2, dmrt1 and amh have also been connected to sex determining processes in teleost species. These genes exhibit sexually dimorphic expression patterns during male and female development, and interact with cyp19a1a in various ways (Luckenbach et al. 2005; Nakamoto et al. 2006; Ijiri et al. 2008;

Herpin and Schartl 2011; Smith et al. 2013). In order to more fully characterize the sex determining window in summer flounder, additional work is needed on expression patterns of foxl2, dmrt1 and amh in this species.

Foxl2 (Forkhead transcriptional factor 2) is a transcription factor in the winged helix/forkhead group (Nakamoto et al. 2006; Kobayashi et al. 2010). It is highly conserved in vertebrates, and in teleosts it plays a role in ovarian development. More specifically, it encodes a transcription factor that binds to a promoter region of cyp19a1a, which activates P450 ovarian

54 aromatase transcription (Pannetier et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2007; Yamaguchi et al. 2007; Ijiri et al. 2008; Guiguen et al. 2010). Foxl2 is the earliest known sex marker in teleosts, and in females it has been shown to exhibit increased expression before or concurrently with increased cyp19a1a expression, and demonstrates a similar response to water temperature (Smith et al.

2013; Wang et al. 2004; Nakamoto et al. 2006; Yamaguchi et al. 2007; Kobayashi et al. 2010).

However, it exhibits less pronounced dimorphic expression than cyp19a1a, perhaps because it is more broadly expressed in a greater number of tissue types (Smith et al. 2013).

Dmrt1 (Doublesex/mab-3 related transcription factor 1) is a highly conserved gene that encodes a protein involved in regulating male development (Kobayashi et al. 2008). In mammals it has been linked to testis differentiation (Raymond et al. 2000), and in various teleost species, including Japanese flounder, dmrt1 is more highly expressed in developing testes than in ovaries, which may be due to high levels of dmrt1 promoter methylation in ovaries, and no such methylation in testes (Wen et al. 2014). However, the timing and location of dmrt1 expression varies greatly by species (Johnsen and Anderson 2012; Kobayashi et al. 2004; Kobayashi et al.

2008; Herpin and Schartl 2011). A homolog of dmrt1, dmy(dmrt1b(y)) has been identified as the master sex determining gene in the medaka, but it only occurs in two out of twenty closely related Ozyrias species, which suggests that it is not the master sex determining gene in other fish species (Matsuda et al. 2002; 2007).

Amh, also known as mis (Müllerian inhibiting substance) is a gene that codes for anti-

Müllerian hormone, a glycoprotein in the transforming growth factor β (TGF- β) superfamily

(Yoshinaga et al. 2004). In mammals it is up-regulated in developing testes and down-regulated in developing ovaries (Cate et al. 1986; Swain and Lovell-Badge 1999). In lower vertebrates, amh is involved in the downregulation of foxl2 and cyp19a1a (Western et al. 1999; Rodríguez-

55

Marí et al. 2005; Baroiller et al. 2009; Hattori et al. 2012). Amh exhibits sexually dimorphic expression in various fish species, and has been shown to play a role in testis differentiation and development (Yoshinaga et al. 2004; Rodríguez-Marí et al. 2005; Ijiri et al. 2008; Siegfried

2010). In sablefish it is a more robust male sex marker than dmrt1, and in the Patagonian perjerrey (Odontesthes hatcheri), there is evidence that amhy, a homolog of amh, is the master sex determining gene (Hattori et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2013). However, few specifics are known about how amh regulates male development, and additional research is needed.

To identify the sex determining window in summer flounder, and better understand the mechanisms involved in sex determination, it is necessary to look at the expressional patterns of these additional sex determining genes. Foxl2, dmrt1 and amh have previously been studied in other teleosts, including Japanese flounder, and understanding their expression in summer flounder will provide a clearer picture of the sex determination process in this species. The objective of this preliminary work was to investigate the timing and magnitude of foxl2, dmrt1 and amh expression in summer flounder reared at three different experimental temperatures. This was achieved by identifying partial summer flounder sequences for these three genes, and assessing their expression patterns in real time quantitative PCR, using summer flounder juveniles raised at 13, 16, and 19°C (Chapter 2).

Materials and methods

Broodstock culture and juvenile rearing

Summer flounder broodstock were captured from Rhode Island coastal waters and held at

GreatBay Aquaculture LLC (GBA; Portsmouth, NH) for at least two years prior to the start of the experiment. Fish were maintained in recirculating aquaculture systems until spawning (~5 years, 1.3 kg) as described in Chapter 2. To obtain ovarian and testis tissue for partial cDNA

56 identification, one adult female and one adult male broodstock were euthanized via immersion in

MS-222, and ovaries and testis were immediately dissected, preserved in RNA Later® Solution, and stored at -70°C for later RNA extractions.

Summer flounder broodstock were spawned at GBA, and larvae were raised to the beginning of metamorphosis (Chapter 2). Juveniles (37 DPH) in various stages of metamorphosis (Figure 6) were transferred to the Aquaculture Research Center (ARC) at the

University of New Hampshire (UNH; Durham, NH), where they were maintained in three separate recirculating systems as described in Chapter 2.

Figure 6. Summer flounder in various stages of metamorphosis during transfer to the Aquaculture Research Center (ARC) at 37 DPH. Individuals range from pelagic, symmetrical larvae to demersal juveniles that have undergone eye migration and settled to the bottom.

Juvenile summer flounder sampling

To provide an initial assessment prior to exposure to different temperatures, fish at 38

DPH (n = 5 fish/system) were weighed and measured (SL). Gonadal regions (Figure 3) were excised, preserved in RNA Later® Solution, and stored at -70°C for later RNA extractions. All fish were acclimated at 19°C for one week (38-44 DPH). Fish in one system were then maintained at 19°C, while the two other systems were slowly cooled (1°C/day) to reach final

57 temperatures of 13 and 16°C. Fish from all three temperature treatments were sampled as described above at 52 DPH (n = 4 fish/treatment), and again at 66 DPH (n = 9 fish/treatment).

To further investigate juvenile growth and expression patterns during later development, additional fish from the 13 and 16°C treatments were sampled at 105, 133, and 171 DPH (n = 5,

8, or 9 fish/treatment), and an additional 12 fish from 13°C were sampled at 191 DPH. All fish were weighed, measured (SL until 105 DPH, SL and total length (TL) starting at 133 DPH), and gonadal regions were removed.

As outlined in Chapter 2, remaining fish were maintained at their respective temperatures until 217 DPH, at which point all treatments were slowly increased to 21°C over two weeks

(<1°C/day). Remaining fish were grown to >150 mm TL, at which point approximately 50 fish from each treatment were euthanized with MS-222 and gonads were visually assessed, to determine sex ratios (Colburn et al. 2015). Fish that could not be sexed visually were sexed using histological techniques and gonad characteristics (Chapter 2).

Partial cDNA identification

Total RNA was extracted from adult summer flounder ovary and testis tissues and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the techniques described in Chapter 2. Gene-specific primers were designed to amplify 400-600 base pair (bp) partial sequences for foxl2, dmrt1 and amh. For foxl2 a primer set based on the partial foxl2 sequence for Paralichthys lethostigma

(KF534720.1) was designed using NCBI primer-BLAST. For dmrt1 a consensus alignment of

Anoplopoma fimbria (KC112917), Paralichthys olivaceus (EU490514.1), Epinephelus coioides

(EF017802.1), Dicentrarchus labrax (AM993096.1), and Oreochromis niloticus (AF203489.1) partial sequences was used to design primers Geneious 4.7.6. For amh a primer set based on the

58 partial amh sequence for Paralichthys olivaceus (AB166791.1) was designed using NCBI primer-BLAST.

Primers and gonadal cDNA (ovary for foxl2, testis for dmrt1 and amh) were used in the

Clontech Advantage 2 PCR kit and standard PCR thermocycling conditions (see Chapter 2).

PCR products were electrophoresed, and bands at the expected base pair (bp) size were excised from the gel. PCR products were extracted from agarose gels, and sequenced at the UNH

Hubbard Center for Genome Studies (described in Chapter 2) with the forward primers for foxl2 and dmrt1, and the reverse primer for amh. Chromatograms were quality trimmed and analyzed using: 1) Blastn against NCBI general nucleotide database and 2) Blastx against NCBI protein database (n/r). For each gene, the resulting nucleotide sequence was a 90-100% identity match with at least two closely related fish species, and the translated protein sequence was a 90-100% match with at least two closely related fish species, which indicates that the correct gene product was identified.

RNA extractions and cDNA synthesis of juvenile samples

Juvenile summer flounder gonadal regions were used in RNA extractions, using techniques described above and in Chapter 2. RNA was quantified, reverse transcribed, and juvenile summer flounder cDNA was stored at -20°C prior to relative quantification with real time quantitative PCR.

Real-Time Quantitative PCR (QPCR)

Foxl2, dmrt1 and amh primer sets for QPCR were designed in NCBI Primer-Blast to amplify 80-150 bp fragments (Table 2). Relative quantification assays were performed with 1000 nM primer concentrations for foxl2 and amh, and 800 nM primer concentrations for amh in standard cycling conditions, followed by dissociation curve analysis. Samples were performed in

59 duplicate, and triplicate relative standard curves were generated from dilutions of pooled cDNA from eight individuals per gene. Optimized assays consisted of 6-8 point linear standard curves with approximately 95-110% PCR efficiency. Standard QPCR negative controls were performed in duplicate for each assay and exhibited no contamination. Both gene assays displayed a single peak in dissociation curve analysis (complete QPCR techniques described in Chapter 2).

Table 2. Primer sequences and product sizes (bp) for partial cds identification and QPCR assays, with percent efficiency (% eff) and mean cycle threshold (Ct) values for QPCR assays. Mean Ct values refer to the mean 1/10 diluted standard curve point for each assay. Higher Ct values indicate lower mRNA abundance.

Gene symbol 5’-Forward primer-3’ % eff Ct bp 5’-Reverse primer-3’

Partial cds identification

foxl2 GGGGAGAGGAAGGGGAACTA -- -- 466 CGTTGCTGGAGGAGACCG

dmrt1 GGGACGATCCCCGACACCCA -- -- 498 GCTGCTGGCCTCGCACTCAG

amh GTGACGACCTGAACGTGACT -- -- 532 GGAGACAGAGCCAACTGTCC

QPCR assays

foxl2 CCCAAGTACCTGCAGTCTAGC 110.3 28.1 142 AAGAGGAAGGGGGTGACAGT

dmrt1 GTTAGGGCTCATGCTGAGGG 96.0 30.2 87 GTAGGTCGGGTAGCATGACG

amh GATAGCTGGGGCATGGACTG 96.2 29.0 141 TTCAGGATCAACCTCCCCCT

Statistical Analysis

PCR results were analyzed using the Pfaffl method for relative quantification (Pfaffl

2001), described in Chapter 2. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted in JMP 60

Pro 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) to assess significant differences in gene expression and fish growth (p<0.05) for foxl2, dmrt1 and amh and. Each ANOVA was followed by a Tukey's

HSD means separation test to identify pairwise significant differences. All numerical data are represented as the mean ± standard error. Linear regression analyses were performed in JMP Pro

11 to identify correlations between fish size and foxl2, dmrt1 and amh expression.

Results

Partial cDNA fragments

The 401 bp fragment corresponding to foxl2 was quality trimmed from the expected fragment size (466 bp). It exhibited high nucleotide sequence identity with other teleost species including Paralichthys lethostigma (99%) and Paralichthys olivaceus (99%), while the translated protein sequence exhibited high identity match with Paralichthys olivaceus (100%) and

Paralichthys lethostigma (100%). The 154 bp fragment corresponding to dmrt1 was quality trimmed from the expected fragment size (498 bp). It exhibited high nucleotide sequence identity with other teleost species including Paralichthys olivaceus (98%) and Hippoglossus hippoglossus (96%). The translated protein sequence exhibited high identity match with

Paralichthys olivaceus (100%) and Hippoglossus hippoglossus (93%). The 154 bp fragment corresponding to amh was quality trimmed from the expected fragment size (532 bp). It exhibited high nucleotide sequence identity with other teleost species including Paralichthys olivaceus (99%) and Hippoglossus hippoglossus (92%). The translated protein sequence exhibited high identity match with Paralichthys olivaceus (100%) and Hippoglossus hippoglossus (92%). The foxl2, dmrt1, and amh partial cds sequences were not verified using additional sequencing reactions (>1), and were not submitted to the NCBI GenBank database

(Table 3).

61

Table 3. Quality trimmed gene sequences and product size (bp) for summer flounder foxl2, dmrt1, and amh. Individual fish from all three temperature treatments (13°C, 16°C and 19°C) were sampled throughout development for gene expression analyses.

Gene symbol Trimmed sequence bp foxl2 TTCGAGAAGGGGAACTACAGGAGACGCCGCAGAATGAAGCG 401 GCCGTTCAGACCTCCGCCGACGCACTTCCAGCCGGGGAAGT CGTTATTCGGAGGGGACGGCTACGGTTACCTGTCCCCGCCCA AGTACCTGCAGTCTAGCTTCATGAACAACTCATGGTCGCTCG GCCAGCCACCCACCCCGATGTCCTACACGTCCTGTCAGATGG CCAGTGGCAACGTGAGTCCCGTGAACGTCAAGGGACTGTCA CCCCCTTCCTCTTATAACCCTTACTCCCGGGTGCAGAGCATG GCGCTGCCCAGCATGGTGAACTCTTACAACGGTATGGGTCAC CATCACCACCCCGCGCATCCCCACCATGCGCAGCAACTGAG CCCGGCCACCGCAGCGCCGCCCCCGGT dmrt1 TCGCTCTGCATCATCCTCCAGCCCGTCGGCCGGCGTTAGGGC 154 TCATGCTGAGGGAGCGTCCGACCTGCTGATGGAAACCTCCTA TTACAACTTCTACCAGCCGTCATGCTACCCGACCTACTACAG CAACCTCTACAACTACCAGCAATACCAG amh ACAAGCCCAGCGATAGCTGGGGCATGGACTGTAGGGAGTCC AGCTGGAGCTGAGGGGACTCAGGGCGGTCCTGAGGCAAGAC 154 ATCGCACAGGAAGCGCCTCAGCTCACACAGGAAGGAGAAGG TCTGTGATGAGGGGGAGGTTGATCCTGAAAC

Foxl2, dmrt1 and amh expression during juvenile development

During early juvenile development, when cyp19a1a expression significantly differed by treatment (Chapter 2), foxl2 and amh expression remained stable in all treatments at 38, 52 and

66 DPH, while dmrt1 expression was significantly higher (3.5 fold) in the 13°C treatment at 66

DPH, than in the initial (48 DPH) group (p = 0.0298).

When juvenile development was assessed on a broader scale (38-191 DPH), foxl2 expression was significantly higher in the 13°C treatment at 171 DPH than in 1) the 13°C treatment at 191 DPH, or 2) the 16°C treatment at 66 DPH, while foxl2 expression was significantly lower in the 13°C treatment at 191 DPH than in the 16°C treatment at 171 DPH (p =

62

0.0008). Dmrt1 expression was also significantly higher in the 13°C treatment at 191 DPH than in the initial (48 DPH) group, or in the 16°C treatment at 171 DPH (p=0.0035). No significant differences in amh expression were present among ages or treatments.

A Initial

B A

AB

AB AB AB AB B

C

Figure 7. Relative (A) foxl2 (B) dmrt1 and (C) amh mRNA abundances (normalized to eef1α), during early juvenile development at initial sampling (38 DPH, 19°C), and at 52 and 66 DPH (13, 16 and 19°C). Each bar represents the mean + standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments and ages (p < 0.05).

63

A A

C AB B

BC

B AB AB

C BC

C

Figure 8. Summer flounder relative (A) foxl2, (B) dmrt1 and (C) amh mRNA abundances (normalized to eef1α) during juvenile development at 13 and 16°C (38-191 DPH). Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments and ages (p < 0.05). All unlabeled time point refer to ABC designations for pairwise comparisons.

There was no relationship between fish size and foxl2 expression at 13°C, but there was a positive correlation between fish size and foxl2 expression at 16°C (p < 0.0001). There was no relationship between fish size and dmrt1 expression at 13 or 16°C, nor was there a relationship

64 between fish size and amh expression at 16°C. There was a positive correlation between fish size and amh expression at 13°C (p = 0.0039). *

y = -0.0007x – 0.0048 2 R = 0.0003 y = -0.0145x - 0.3548 2 A R = 0.2561

*

yy = = 0.0054x 0.0054x + + 0.0794 0.0794 yy = = 0.0009x 0.0009x + + 0.0555 0.0555 B RR2 2= = 0.0362 0.0362 RR22 = = 0.0013 0.0013

y = 0.0152x – 0.2233 y = 0.0059x + 0.1339 y = 0.0152x2 – 0.2233 y = 0.0059x2 – 0.1339 R 2= 0.1285 R2 = 0.0297 C R = 0.1285 R = 0.0297

Standard length (mm)

Figure 9. Relationship between relative (A) foxl2, (B) dmrt1and (C) amh mRNA abundance (logarithmic scale) and standard length (mm) of fish raised at 13 and 16°C Asterisks denote significant correlations (p < 0.05).

65

Discussion

Fishes vary greatly in their processes of sex determination, and cyp19a1a has been studied extensively as an important gene that influences male or female development (Kitano et al. 1999; Luckenbach et al. 2005). However, genes such as foxl2, dmrt1 and amh have also been shown to play an important role in teleost sex determination, and exhibit sexually dimorphic expression during male or female differentiation of various species (Luckenbach et al. 2005;

Nakamoto et al. 2006; Ijiri et al. 2008; Herpin and Schartl 2011; Smith et al. 2013). These genes, like cyp19a1a, have been established as robust sex markers in other teleosts, including Japanese flounder, and are similarly sensitive to temperature effects during a critical period of juvenile development (Kitano et al. 1999; Luckenbach et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2013). However, results in the present study found little relationship between foxl2, dmrt1 or amh expression and summer flounder ages, sizes, or temperature treatments, which suggests that they may be less robust sex markers in summer flounder than cyp19a1a (discussed in Chapter 2).

Cyp19a1a is predominantly expressed in ovarian tissue to convert testosterone to 17β- estradiol (Kitano et al. 1999; Luckenbach et al. 2005). By contrast, foxl2, dmrt1 and amh encode for products that are present in a wider range of tissues and play more diverse roles other than sex determination during juvenile development (Ijiri et al. 2008; Smith et al 2013; Shen and

Wang 2014), which may result in divergent expressional patterns.

In several teleost species, foxl2 gene expression precedes that of cyp19a1a and activates

P450 aromatase production (Nakamoto et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2007; Yamaguchi et al. 2007;

Ijiri et al. 2008). While it is linked to female development and shows sexually dimorphic expression, foxl2 is considered a less robust sex marker than cyp19a1a in sablefish (Smith et al.

2013). Previous studies demonstrated that foxl2 is more broadly expressed in a greater number of

66 tissue types than cyp19a1a, which is predominately expressed in the gonad. Extra-gonadal foxl2 expression has been observed in sablefish (Anaoplopoma fimbria; pituitary; Smith et al. 2013), three-spotted wrasse (Halichoeres trimaculatus; brain, pituitary, eyes, gills and liver; Kobayashi et al. 2010) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus; brain, pituitary and gills; Wang et al. 2004).

Additionally, a study on rainbow trout identified two paralogs of foxl2, one expressed early in development that correlates with cyp19a1a expression (foxl2a), and another expressed later in development, that has no relationship with cyp19a1a expression (foxl2b; Baron et al. 2004;

2005).

In the present study there was a positive correlation between foxl2 expression and fish size at 16°C, and no correlation at 13°C. The small size of summer flounder juveniles sampled necessitated the use of “gonadal regions” for gene expression analysis which contained non- gonadal tissue. In addition, it is unknown if multiple foxl2 paralogs are present in summer flounder. The absence of a consistent relationship between fish size and foxl2 expression may be due to mRNA contributions from extra-gonadal tissue, or unknown foxl2 paralogs.

Less is known about the role of dmrt1 and amh in sex differentiation of teleosts, though both have been linked to male development, and exhibit sexually dimorphic expression in some species, and no trend in others (Kobayashi et al. 2004; Guo et al. 2005; Hattori et al. 2007;

Kobayashi et al. 2008; Johnsen et al. 2010; Herpin and Schartl 2011; Johnsen and Andersen

2012). In zebrafish, three isoforms of dmrt1 have been identified (dmrt1a, dmrt1b and dmrt1c).

Dmrt1a exhibits much higher expression in the testis than the other isoforms, and cumulatively these isoforms produce transcription factors that play diverse roles in regulating sex determination. Dmrt1a is expressed at a lower level in the ovaries, and may also be important in ovary differentiation (Guo et al. 2005). In the present study, there was no clear trend in dmrt1

67 gene expression levels based on age, size, or temperature treatment. The broad nature of dmrt1 functioning and the potential for isoforms may explain why an expressional trend was not present in summer flounder gonadal regions.

Amh is a more robust male sex marker than dmrt1 in sablefish (Smith et al. 2013), and may be a homolog of amhy, the master sex determining gene in the Patagonian perjerrey (Hattori et al. 2012). However, amh expression levels in the Patagonian perjerrey are not influenced by temperature, and amh shows no sexually dimorphic expression in the medaka (Klüver et al.

2007; Shen and Wang 2014). In the present study, there was no trend in amh expression by size, age or treatment, which may be explained by the variations in amh temperature sensitivity, expression patterns and role in male sex determination that are present among different species.

It is also possible that expression levels for dmrt1 and amh genes were affected by the presence of extra-gonadal tissue in the gonad regions used for gene expression analyses, as suggested for foxl2.

The present study found no clear foxl2, dmrt1 or amh gene expression patterns in summer flounder, which may reflect the use of gonadal regions for expression analyses, or the presence of unidentified gene paralogs and/or isoforms. It is also possible that foxl2, dmrt1 and amh are less robust markers than cyp19a1a for sex determination in this species. However, closely related

Japanese flounder exhibit clear sexually dimorphic foxl2, dmrt1 and amh expression patterns

(Yoshinaga et al. 2004; Kitano et al. 2007; Herpin and Schartl 2011; Wen et al. 2014). Future studies on foxl2, dmrt1 and amh expression in summer flounder should include earlier juveniles stages, including pre-metamorphic larvae, and focus on dissected gonads rather than gonad regions. Future work should also determine if multiple gene paralogs/isoforms exist, and how their expression patterns coincide with other genes involved in sex determination. Such research

68 will provide a better assessment of how the timing and/or mechanism of sex determination in summer flounder differs from other Paralichthyd species.

Literature Cited

Baroiller JF, D’Cotta H, Saillant E (2009) Environmental effects on fish sex determination and differentiation. Sexual Development 3:118-135

Baron D, Cocquet J, Xia X, Fellous M, Guiguen Y, Veitia RA (2004) An evolutionary and functional analysis of Foxl2 in rainbow trout gonad differentiation. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 33:705-715

Cate RL, Mattaliano RJ, Hession C, Tizard R, Farber NM, Cheung A, Ninfa EG, Frey AZ, Gash DJ, Chow EP, Fisher RA, Bertonis JM, Torres G, Wallner BP, Ramachandran KL, Ragin RC, Manganaro TF, MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK (1986) Isolation of the bovine and human genes for Müllerian inhibiting substance and expression of the human gene in animal cells. Cell 45:685-698

Colburn HR, Nardi GC, Borski RJ, Berlisnky DL (2009) Induced meiotic gynogenesis and sex differentiation in summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus). Aquaculture 289:175-180

Guiguen Y, Fostier A, Piferrer F, Chang C-F (2010) Ovarian aromatase and estrogens: a pivotal role for gonadal sex differentiation and sex change in fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology 165:352-366

Guo Y, Cheng H, Huang X, Gao S, Yu H, Zhou R (2005) Gene structure, multiple alternative splicing, and expression in gonads of zebrafish Dmrt1. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 330:950-957

Hattori RS, Murai Y, Oura M, Masuda S, Majhi SK, Sakamoto T, Fernandino JL, Somoza GM, Yokota M, Strüssmann CA (2012) A Y-linked anti-Müllerian hormone duplication takes over a critical role in sex determination. PNAS 109(8):2955-2959

Herpin A, Schartl M (2011) Dmrt1 genes at the crossroads: A widespread and central class of sexual development factors in fish. FEBS Journal 278:1010-1019

Ijiri S, Kaneko H, Kobayashi T, Wang D-S, Sakai F, Paul-Prasanth B, Nakamura M, Nagaham Y (2008) Sexual dimorphic expression of genes in gonads during early differentiation of a teleost fish, the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Biology of Reproduction 78:333-341

Johnsen H, Andersen O (2012) Sex dimorphic expression of five dmrt genes identified in the Atlantic cod genome. The fish-specific dmrt2b diverged from dmrt2a before the fish whole- genome duplication. Gene 505:221-232

69

Kitano T, Takahume K, Kobayashi T, Nagahama Y, Abe S-I (1999) Supression of P450 aromatase gene expression in sex-reversed males produced by rearing genetically female larvae at a high water temperature during a period of sex differentiation in the Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 23:167-176

Klüver N, Pfennig F, Pala I, Storch K, Schlieder M, Froschauer A, Gutzeit HO, Schartl M (2007) Differential expression of anti-Müllerian hormone (amh) receptor type II (amhrII) in the teleost medaka. Developmental Dynamics 236:271-281

Kobayashi T, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Guan G, Nagahama Y (2008) Sexual dimorphic expression of DMRT1 and Sox9a during gonadal differentiation and hormone-induced sex reversal in the teleost fish Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Developmental Dynamics 237:297-306

Kobayashi T, Matsuda M, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Suzuki A, Saito N, Nakamoto M, Shibata N, Nagahama Y (2004) Two DM domain genes, DMY and DMRT1, involved in testicular differentiation and development in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Developmental Dynamics 231:518-526

Kobayashi Y, Horiguchi R, Nozu R, Nakamura M (2010) Expression and localization of forkhead transcriptional factor 2 (Foxl2) in the gonads of protogynous wrasse, Halichoeres trimaculatus. Biology of Sex Differences 1(3):1-9

Kojima Y, Hayashi Y, Mizuno K, Sasaki S, Fukui Y, Koopman P, Morohashi K-I, Kohri K (2008) Up-regulation of SOX9 in human sex-determining region on the Y chromosome (SRY)- negative XX males. Clinical Endocrinology 68:791-799

Luckenbach JA, Early LW, Rowe AH, Borski RJ, Daniels HV, Godwin J (2005) Aromatase cytochrome P450: cloning, intron variation, and ontogeny of gene expression in southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma). Journal of Experimental Zoology 303A:643-656

Luckenbach JA, Godwin J, Daniels HV, Borski RJ (2003) Gonadal differentiation and effects of temperature on sex determination in southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma). Aquaculture 216:315-327

Matsuda M, Nagahama Y, Shinomiya A, Sato T, Matsuda C, Kobayashi T, Morrey CE, Shibata N, Asakawa S, Shimizu N, Hori H, Hamaguchi S, Sakaizumi M (2002) DMY is a Y-specific DM-domain gene required for male development in the medaka fish. Nature 417:559-562

Matsuda M, Shinomiya A, Kinoshita M, Suzuki A, Kobayashi T, Bindhu P-P, Lau E, Hamaguchi S, Sakaizumi M, Nagahama Y (2007) DMY gene induces male development in genetically female (XX) medaka fish. PNAS 104(10):3865-3870

Nakamoto M, Matsuda M, Wang D-S, Nagahama Y, Shibata N (2006) Molecular cloning and analysis of gonadal expression of Foxl2 in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Biochemical Research Communications 344:353-361

70

Pannetier M, Fabre S, Batista F, Kocer A, Renault L, Jolivet G, Mandon-Pepín B, Cotinot C, Veitia R, Pailhoux E (2006) FOXL2 activates P450 aromatase gene transcription: towards a better characterization of the early steps of mammalian ovarian development. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 36:399-413

Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT—PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29(900): 2002-2007

Piferrer F (2001) Endocrine sex control strategies for the feminization of teleost fish. Aquaculture 197:229-281

Raymond CS, Murphy MW, O’Sullivan MG, Bardwell VJ, Zarkower D (2000) Dmrt1, a gene related to worm and fly sexual regulators, is required for mammalian testis differentiation. Genes & Development 14:2587-2595

Rodríguez-Marí A, Yan Y-L, BreMiller RA, Wilson C, Cañestro C, Postlethwait JH (2005) Characterization and expression pattern of zebrafish anti-Müllerian hormone (amh) relative sox9a, sox9b, and cyp19a1a, during gonad development. Gene Expression Patterns 5:655-667

Shen Z, Wang H (2014) Molecular players involved in temperature-dependent sex determination and sex differentiation in teleost fish. Genetics Selection Evolution 46(26):1-21

Siegfried KR (2010) In search of determinants: gene expression during gonadal sex differentiation. Journal of Fish Biology 76:1879-1902

Smith EK, Guzmán JM, Luckenbach JA (2013) Molecular cloning, characterization, and sexually dimorphic expression of five major sex differentiation-related genes in a Scorpaeniform fish, sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part B 165:125-137

Swain A, Lovell-Badge R (1999) Mammalian sex determination: a molecular drama. Genes & Development 13:755-767

Wang D, Kobayashi T, Zhou L, Nagahama Y (2004) Molecular cloning and gene expression of Foxl2 in the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 320:83-89

Wang D, Kobayashi T, Zhou L, Paul-Prasanth B, Ijiri S, Sakai F, Okubo K, Morohashi K, Nagahama Y (2007) Foxl2 up-regulates aromatase gene transcription in a female-specific manner by binding to the promoter as well as interacting with ad4 binding protein/steroidogenic factor 1. Molecular Endocrinology 21(3):712-725

Western PS, Harry JL, Marshall-Graves JAM, Sinclair AH (1999) Temperature-dependent sex determination in the American alligator: AMH precedes SOX9 expression. Developmental Dynamics 216:411-419

71

Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi S, Hirai T, Kitano T (2007) Follicle-stimulating hormone signaling and Foxl2 are involved in transcriptional regulation of aromatase gene during gonadal sex differentiation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 359:935-940

Yoshinaga N, Shiraishi E, Yamamoto T, Iguchi T, Abe A, Kitano T (2004) Sexually dimorphic expression of a teleost homologue of Müllerian inhibiting substance during gonadal sex differentiation in Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 322:508-513

72

CHAPTER 4

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides progress towards understanding the sex determining process in summer flounder, by focusing on temperature effects and gene expression patterns during juvenile development. Low female production was achieved overall, regardless of temperature, but cyp19a1a expression results suggest that the window of temperature sensitivity for sex determination in summer flounder may occur earlier than it does in congeneric Japanese and southern flounder. No consistent trend in foxl2, dmrt1 and amh gene expression occurred based on fish size, fish age, or temperature treatment.

Further research should take a more fine-scale approach to gene expression work, by focusing on summer flounder very early in development. Future studies should expose pre- metamorphic, larval summer flounder to differential temperature treatments, and sample fish starting in this pelagic stage before metamorphosis has been initiated. Frequent sampling for gene expression analyses will ensure that the window of temperature sensitivity during sex determination can be pinpointed. In many fish species foxl2 expression precedes that of cyp19a1a, which further necessitates early developmental summer flounder sampling to establish the relationship between these genes. Future work should also focus on dissected gonads rather than gonadal regions, to eliminate the mRNA contributions of non-gonadal tissue that likely affected apparent gene expression levels in the present study. It is possible that foxl2, dmrt1 and amh are less robust sex markers in summer flounder than cyp19a1a, but additional research is needed to more clearly identify processes related to sex differentiation in this species.

73

If summer flounder do possess a much earlier window of temperature sensitivity during sex determination than congenerics, then this is an important development for the aquaculture potential of this species. Thus far all previous studies have achieved low female production regardless of temperature (Colburn et al. 2009; 2015). It is possible that culturing at even lower temperatures could further increase female production, but from a practical aquaculture standpoint the additional growth gained from higher female production at lower temperatures would be offset by slow growth, a prolonged, labor-intensive pelagic phase, and delayed weaning to commercial diets (Gavlik and Specker 2004; Katersky et al. 2008). However, if summer flounder exhibit very early sex determination, and a brief window of temperature sensitivity during this period, early exposure to low temperatures could increase female production. Once fish develop past the sex determination window, temperatures could be increased to promote faster growth, which would allow commercial aquaculture productions to profit from the growth gains associated with female dominated populations.

74

APPENDIX A. ANIMAL CARE AND USE APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION

75