DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Macedonia and the Macedonians: a History Free Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Macedonia and the Macedonians: a History Free Ebook MACEDONIA AND THE MACEDONIANS: A HISTORY DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Andrew Rossos | 392 pages | 01 Jul 2008 | Hoover Institution Press, U.S. | 9780817948825 | English | Stanford, United States Macedonia for the Macedonians Some former IMRO United members such as Metodi Shatorov[39] who were leading member of the Yugoslav Communist Party, also refused to define the Bulgarian forces as occupiers contrary to instructions from Belgrade and called for the incorporation of the local Macedonian Communist organizations within the Bulgarian Communist Party. Serbian languageon the other hand, uses both Cyrilic and Latin scripts. Bulgaria was forced to join the Axis powers inwhen German troops prepared to invade Greece from Romania reached the Bulgarian borders and demanded permission to pass through Bulgarian territory. What we may call 'Ottoman Macedonia' was divided between the Balkan nations, with its northern parts going to Serbian, the Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History to Greece, and the northeastern to Bulgaria. With the help of Mihailov and Macedonian emigrants in Sofia, several pro-German armed detachments - Uhrana were organized in the Kostur, Lerin and Voden districts of Greek Macedonia in Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Both terms can be used in contexts of connection with various Slavic people in Macedonia PomaksTorbeshand Goraniwhich converted to Islam during the Ottoman rule. All of them wrote in standard Bulgarian language. Southern and eastern Serbia and Macedonia Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History liberated within a month. Other editions. Serbia Slovenia. Get A Copy. Inthe population of Blagoevgrad Province was declared Macedonian and teachers were brought in from Yugoslavia to teach the Macedonian language. This prompted the Great Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History to obtain a revision of this treaty. Greeks were resettled in the region in two occasions, firstly following the Bulgarian loss of the Second Balkan War when Bulgaria and Greece mutually exchanged their populations in[29] and secondly in as a result of the population exchange with the new Turkish republic that followed the Greek military defeat in Asia minor. And the reasons of imprisonment, they argue, were multiple as there were Macedonian nationalists, Stalinists, Middle class members, Albanian nationalists and everybody else who was either against the post war Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History or denounced as one for whatever reasons. As ethnographers and linguists tended to identify the population of the Bulgarian part of Macedonia as Bulgarian in the interwar period, the issue of a Macedonian minority in the country came up as late as the s. As last survivor among the communists associated with the idea of Macedonian autonomy, Dimitar Vlahov was used "solely for window dressing". The supporters of Macedonism generally ignore censuses conducted in Albania, Bulgaria and Greece, which show minimal Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History of ethnic Macedonians. As the region was ethnically diverse, an autonomous, neutral, cantonized by Swiss model state was proposed, where all nationalities will preserve their mother tongues and religions, enjoying the same democratic political rights. Mijaks Shopi. Within three days the Soviets occupied the northeastern part of Bulgaria along with the key port cities of Varna and Burgas. Kindle Editionpages. About Andrew Rossos. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Although Greece and Serbia succeeded in becoming independent Kingdoms, autonomous from Turkey. First, he wanted to reduce Serbia's dominance in Yugoslavia; establishing a territory formerly considered Serbian as an equal to Serbia within Yugoslavia achieved this effect. Andrej is currently reading it Jun 29, A similar procedure was applied to Greek names in Bulgaria and Serbia e. Next to the Ottoman Government nothing can be more deplorable and blameworthy than jealousies between Greek and Slav and plans by the States already existing for appropriating other territory. Despite calls for liberation and even the founding of a united Macedonian principality i. Gorani Macedonian Muslims. Under the guidance of the Patriarchate at Constantinople they were promoters of Christianity and initiated Slavic literacy among the Slavic people. The ideologists of a separate and independent Macedonian country, same as the pro-Bulgarian sentiment, was forcibly suppressed. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Want to Read saving…. Viktor Simovski is currently reading it Jul 30, The ideas of separate Macedonian identity grew in significance after the First World War, both in Vardar Macedonia and among the left-leaning diaspora in Bulgaria, and were endorsed by the Comintern. More filters. By Novemberthe Ilinden Uprising was suppressed. Thus, the primer Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History for the " Slavic-speaking minority" children in Greek Macedonia to learn their native language in school, entitled " ABECEDAR " [32] [33] [34] was offered as an argument in support of this statement. Greece, however, recognizes the Rainbow political party of the Slavic-speaking Macedonians who canvas during elections. This expansion of medieval states on the Balkan Peninsula was discontinued by the occupation of the Ottoman Empire in the 14th century. Roman Catholic Greek Catholic. Clare added it May 11, Download as PDF Printable version. Inthe historian William Miller argued against Gladstone's proclamation and his motto, arguing that this idea would not be practical, as a Macedonian nation did not exist at the time, and that a problem for the Macedonian state would be the mixture of different warring nationalities. History of the Macedonians (ethnic group) Download as PDF Printable version. John Varner marked it as to-read Mar 01, Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia all wished to claim Macedonia, as a key strategic part of their newly formed kingdoms. In the same year the Organization changed its exclusively Bulgarian character, [13] and opened it to all Macedonians and Thracians regardless of nationality, who wished to participate in the anti-Ottoman movement. They also planned that the administration of the future autonomous Macedonia will rely on the Bulgarian majority. Want to Read saving…. Benoit rated it it was amazing Oct 29, Showing The use of "Macedonians" and "Macedonian emigrants" then equally applied to all ethnic groups in Macedonia - Bulgarians, Wallachians, Turks, Albanians, Greeks and others. By Novemberthe Ilinden Uprising was suppressed. Hidden categories: CS1 maint: archived copy as title Webarchive template wayback links All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from November Articles with unsourced statements from February In the 13th century, the region was briefly passed to LatinBulgarian and back to Byzantine rule. James Harrison marked it as to-read Sep 12, Many of those inhabiting northeastern Greece fled to Bulgaria and very small group to Serbia 68 families after the Balkan wars or were exchanged with native Greeks from Bulgaria under a population exchange treaty in the s. This ad hoc arrangement did not follow any geographic or ethnic correlates, and occurred at the Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History of the development of a local, Macedonian identity, and often involved harassment of peoples in order to profess loyalty to Greece or Bulgaria, and abdicate profession of any independent identity. And time was crucial. He Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History close links with the Croatian Ustashe and with Italy. Language Literature. Friend Reviews. Croatia Montenegro. Andrew Rossos. Ten days later, when the Bulgarian army entered Yugoslav Vardar Macedonia on April 19,it was greeted by most of the population as liberators. British politician William Ewart Gladstone used the slogan inwhen he promoted an idea on a mini- Balkan Federation of MacedoniaBulgaria and Serbia. The left-wing faction opposed Bulgarian nationalism and Macedonia and the Macedonians: A History the creation of a Balkan Socialist Federation with equality for all subjects and nationalities, including Bulgarians. Steevens noted in the preface of the brochure containing the letter of Gladstone, that he has used "Macedonians" as a collective name of the diverse population of the region. Open Preview See a Problem? In the 6th century AD, the part which today forms the Greek region of Macedonia was known as Macedonia Prima first Macedoniaand contained the Empire's second largest city, Thessaloniki. But the situation changed dynamically. Both terms can be used in contexts of connection with various Slavic people in Macedonia PomaksTorbeshand Goraniwhich converted to Islam during the Ottoman rule. These events all conspired to create tensions which would spill over into war. Tito's actions had a number of important consequences for the Macedonians. The organization was secret revolutionary society with aim to make Macedonia an autonomous state but that later became an agent serving Bulgarian interests in Balkan politics. All of them wrote in standard Bulgarian language. In this situation, the population was divided in different groups. Bulgaria's lost much of the territory it had gained, losing Thrace and Macedonia back to the Turks. Escape the Present with These 24 Historical Romances. In IMRO entered negotiations with the Comintern about collaboration between the communists and the Macedonian movement and the creation of a united Macedonian movement. Emperors Constans II and Justinian II had to resort to military
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Making of Yugoslavia's People's Republic of Macedonia 377 Ward the Central Committee of the Yugoslav Communist Party Hardened
    THE MAKING OF YUGOSLAVIA’S PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Fifty years since the liberation of Macedonia, the perennial "Ma­ cedonian Question” appears to remain alive. While in Greece it has deF­ initely been settled, the establishment of a "Macedonian State” within the framework of the People’s Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has given a new form to the old controversy which has long divided the three Balkan States, particularly Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. The present study tries to recount the events which led to its founding, the purposes which prompted its establishment and the methods employed in bringing about the tasks for which it was conceived. The region of Southern Yugoslavia,' which extends south of a line traversed by the Shar Mountains and the hills just north of Skopje, has been known in the past under a variety of names, each one clearly denoting the owner and his policy concerning the region.3 The Turks considered it an integral part of their Ottoman Empire; the Serbs, who succeeded them, promptly incorporated it into their Kingdom of Serbs and Croats and viewed it as a purely Serbian land; the Bulgarians, who seized it during the Nazi occupation of the Balkans, grasped the long-sought opportunity to extend their administrative control and labeled it part of the Bulgarian Father- land. As of 1944, the region, which reverted to Yugoslavia, has been known as the People’s Republic of Macedonia, one of the six federative republics of communist Yugoslavia. The new name and administrative structure, exactly as the previous ones, was intended for the purpose of serving the aims of the new re­ gime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia
    XII. The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia by Iakovos D. Michailidis Most of the reports on Greece published by international organisations in the early 1990s spoke of the existence of 200,000 “Macedonians” in the northern part of the country. This “reasonable number”, in the words of the Greek section of the Minority Rights Group, heightened the confusion regarding the Macedonian Question and fuelled insecurity in Greece’s northern provinces.1 This in itself would be of minor importance if the authors of these reports had not insisted on citing statistics from the turn of the century to prove their points: mustering historical ethnological arguments inevitably strengthened the force of their own case and excited the interest of the historians. Tak- ing these reports as its starting-point, this present study will attempt an historical retrospective of the historiography of the early years of the century and a scientific tour d’horizon of the statistics – Greek, Slav and Western European – of that period, and thus endeavour to assess the accuracy of the arguments drawn from them. For Greece, the first three decades of the 20th century were a long period of tur- moil and change. Greek Macedonia at the end of the 1920s presented a totally different picture to that of the immediate post-Liberation period, just after the Balkan Wars. This was due on the one hand to the profound economic and social changes that followed its incorporation into Greece and on the other to the continual and extensive population shifts that marked that period. As has been noted, no fewer than 17 major population movements took place in Macedonia between 1913 and 1925.2 Of these, the most sig- nificant were the Greek-Bulgarian and the Greek-Turkish exchanges of population under the terms, respectively, of the 1919 Treaty of Neuilly and the 1923 Lausanne Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Traditions of Mediterranean Humanism and the Challenges of Our Times
    PROJEKT OKLADKI AKCEPT 2 pop:Layout 1 11/19/15 6:14 PM Page 1 The Traditions of Mediterranean Humanism and the Challenges Our Times: Frontiers Humanity The Traditions of Mediterranean Humanism and the Challenges of Our Times: the Fron tie rs of HUMANITY International Interdisciplinary Doctoral Programme 2010-–2015 FREE COPY Project co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund under the Operational Programme Innovative Economy Faculty of “Artes Liberales” University of Warsaw The Traditions of Mediterranean Humanism and the Challenges of Our Times: the Frontiers of Humanity International Interdisciplinary Doctoral Programme 2010–2015 Warsaw 2015 Tis work was prepared within the project „Te Traditions of Mediterranean Humanism and the Challenges of Our Times: the Frontiers of Humanity” supported by the Foundation for Polish Science – International PhD Programme, co-fnanced by the European Union within the European Regional Development Fund. Translation into English and proofreading Janina Surowiec and Christopher Culver Cover design Monika Ozdarska Typeseting Michał Kucharski All photos printed on the back cover and inside kindly provided by the Participants or downloaded from the ofcial website of the Programme (www.mpd.al.uw.edu.pl). © Faculty of “Artes Liberales,” University of Warsaw and the Authors, 2015 Faculty of “Artes Liberales” Nowy Świat 69 00-046 Warszawa www.al.uw.edu.pl Printed and bound by Zakład Grafczny Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28 00-927 Warszawa no. 906/2015 Contents Introductory note
    [Show full text]
  • Unlikely Identities
    Unlikely Identities: In May of 1911 an Ottoman deputy from Thessaloniki, Dimitar Vlahov, interjected Abu Ibrahim and the himself in a parliamentary debate about Zionism in Palestine with a question: “Are Politics of Possibility in 2 Arab peasants opposed to the Jews?” 1 Late Ottoman Palestine Answering himself, he declared that there was no enmity between Arab and Samuel Dolbee & Shay Hazkani Jewish peasants since, in his estimation, “They are brothers [onlar kardeştir], and like brothers they are trying to live.” Noting that in the past few weeks “anti- Semitism” had appeared on the pages of newspapers, he reiterated his message of familial bonds: “Whatever happens, the truth is in the open. Among Jewish, Arab, and Turkish peasants, there is nothing that will cause conflict. They are brothers.” Vlahov Efendi’s somewhat simplistic message of coexistence was not popular, appearing as it did in the midst of a charged debate about Zionist land acquisitions in Palestine.3 Other deputies in parliament pressed him about the source of his information on these apparent familial ties between peasants. He had mentioned “Arab newspapers,” but ʿAbd al-Mehdi Bey of Karbala wanted to know which ones he had consulted to support his claims. “In Jaffa there is a newspaper that appears named ‘Palestine,’” Vlahov replied. Commotion in the hall interrupted his speech at this point, but Vlahov continued, explaining how the paper suggested Hadera [Khdeira], south of Haifa, had been “nothing but wild animals” thirty years before but had recently become economically prosperous through Zionist settlement. Rishon LeZion, one of the first Zionist colonies, was another engine of development, as its tax revenue had increased a hundred- fold in the previous three decades, he claimed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • Kebapche Kyufte
    Kebapche Minced meat grilled sausage Ingredients 2 lbs minced meat (60% pork, 40% beef) 1 tablespoon salt 1 tablespoon ground black pepper 1/2 teaspoon cumin 1 glove garlic, minced (we prefer it with garlic but it's not necessary) Preparation Mix all ingredients together, mix well. Leave in the fridge for at least 30 minutes. Take out and roll in sausage like pieces. Makes about 30 pieces. Kyufte Minced meat meatball Ingredient 2 lbs minced meat (60% pork, 40% beef) 1 onion, chopped 1 tablespoon salt 1 tablespoon ground black pepper 1 teaspoon cumin 1 glove garlic, minced (we prefer it with garlic but it's not necessary) Preparation Mix all ingredients together, mix well. Leave in the fridge for at least 30 minutes. Take out and shape in balls then flatten in patty-like pieces. Makes about 20 pieces. If you think this recipe is exactly like the one for kebapche, look again - this one has onion in it and it makes all the difference Shopska Salad Traditional Bulgarian salad Ingredients 4 ripe tomatoes 2 long cucumbers 1 onion 1 red or green pepper 1/3 bunch of parsley 2 tablespoons (olive) oil 3 tablespoons of red wine vinegar 1 cup (1/2 lb) Bulgarian cheese (or feta cheese) Preparation Chop all tomatoes (we recommend leaving the pieces bigger), cucumbers and the pepper and put in a bowl. Add the finely chopped onions and parsley. Sprinkle with the oil and vinegar and mix it all together. Grate the feta on top. About Shopska Salad Shopska salad is a traditional Bulgarian cold salad made from tomatoes, cucumbers, onion, raw or roasted peppers and sirene (Bulgarian cheese, feta cheese, white brine cheese).
    [Show full text]
  • Spyridon Sfetas the Founding of the Slavo-Macedonian Popular
    Spyridon Sfetas Autonomist Movements of the Slavophones in 1944: The Attitude of the Communist Party of Greece and the Protection of the Greek-Yugoslav Border The founding of the Slavo-Macedonian Popular Liberation Front (SNOF) in Kastoria in October 1943 and in Fiorina the following November was a result of two factors: the general negotiations between Tito’s envoy in Yugoslav and Greek Macedonia, Svetozar Vukma- nović-Tempo, the military leaders of the Greek Popular Liberation Army (ELAS), and the political leaders of the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) in July and August 1943 to co-ordinate the resistance movements1; and the more specific discussions between Leonidas Stringos and the political delegate of the GHQ of Yugoslav Macedonia, Cvetko Uzunovski in late August or early September 1943 near Yan- nitsa12. The Yugoslavs’ immediate purpose in founding SNOF was to in­ culcate a Slavo-Macedonian national consciousness in the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia and to enlist the Slavophones of Greek Macedonia into the resistance movement in Yugoslav Macedonia; while their indirect aim was to promote Yugoslavia’s views on the Macedonian Question3. The KKE had recognised the Slavophones as a “Slavo- 1. See T.-A. Papapanagiotou, L ’Effort pour la création du grand quartier général balca- nique et la coopération balcanique, Juin-Septembre 1943 (unpublished postgraduate disser­ tation, Sorbonne, 1991); there is a copy in the library of the Institute for Balkan Studies, Thessaloniki. 2. See S. Vukmanović-Tempo, Revolucija Koja teče, vol. 3, Zagreb 1982, p. 114. In a postwar report to the Central Committee of the KKE on SNOF’s activities, Stringos had this to say about the meeting: “Abas requested that our sections work together against the Germans and that we make things a little easier for their sections that were obliged, because of the operations, to cross over into Greek territory frequently; and they also offered to help with the work among the Slavo-Macedonians, who were still being influenced by the komitadjif’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun and the Lion As Symbols of the Republic of Macedonia a Heraldic and Vexillological Analysis
    THE FLAG HERITAGE FOUNDATION MONOGRAPH AND TRANSLATION SERIES PUBLICATION No. 8 THE SUN AND THE LION AS SYMBOLS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA A HERALDIC AND VEXILLOLOGICAL ANALYSIS by Jovan Jonovski, MTh, MA, PhD, AIH Edward B. Kaye, Editor DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS 2020 THE FLAG HERITAGE FOUNDATION MONOGRAPH AND TRANSLATION SERIES PUBLICATION No. 8 THE SUN AND THE LION AS SYMBOLS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA A HERALDIC AND VEXILLOLOGICAL ANALYSIS by Jovan Jonovski, MTh, MA, PhD, AIH Edward B. Kaye, Editor DANVERS, MASSACHUSETTS 2020 THE FLAG HERITAGE FOUNDATION MONOGRAPH AND TRANSLATION SERIES The Flag Heritage Foundation was established in 1971 in order, among other purposes, “to collect, organize, and disseminate information concerning all aspects of flags and related symbols” and “to promote wide public knowledge of the rich history of flags which fosters international understanding and respect for national heritage.” It is a registered charity in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Flag Heritage Foundation Monograph and Translation Series was established in 2009 to publish monographs on flags and related subjects, and to translate and publish in English works previously appearing in languages inaccessible to many scholars. This is the eighth publication in the Series. FLAG HERITAGE FOUNDATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES Kirby A. Baker, Chair Scot M. Guenter David F. Phillips Anne M. Platoff Flag Heritage Foundation 301 Newbury Street #108 Danvers, Massachusetts 01923 USA (424) 272-0701 www.flagheritagefoundation.org Series Editor David F. Phillips 2331 - 47th Avenue San Francisco, California 94116 USA (415) 753-6190 [email protected] Price: US $15 (plus shipping) Non-profit organizations, libraries, and vexillological and heraldic organizations may obtain copies gratis or at a reduced rate – inquire of the Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Dr. Stephan E. Nikolov (Bulgarian Academy of Sciences) About Macedonian- Bulgarian Relationships
    New Balkan Politics Issue 13, 2013 Interview with Dr. Stephan E. Nikolov (Bulgarian academy of sciences) about Macedonian- Bulgarian relationships 1. M. Maleska: Mr. Nikolov, you published a text entitled “The Bulgaria obsession: Macedonia in the 20th century and Bulgarian Politics” as far back as 2001/2002 in the first issue of NBP. It’s been 13 years since. Is Macedonia still an obsession of Bulgarian politics? What are the priorities of Bulgaria today? What is its politics preoccupied with and where is its interest towards Macedonia in its agenda? The last foreign policy statements of the Bulgarian government before the pressure of mass protests appeared in the country showed clearly that Macedonia continues to be an obsession. This is so especially since the attitude towards present-day Macedonians, imposed as a dogma, is an attitude towards people who have forgotten their Bulgarian origins and who will one day “return” as the prodigal son. Unfortunately, this position is shared by scientists, especially historians, who are dogmatically attached to the concept of invariability of ethnic identity, believing its roots are deep in antiquity and that it is resistant to historical changes, which have caused long-lasting interruptions and lack of a feeling of belonging to a state – undoubtedly the most powerful factor of nation creation, then falling under strong influence of the neighboring countries, which have occasionally ruled over the territories and population that now belong to both states, as well as continual coexistence with people of many various ethnic backgrounds (tribes, peoples), religious beliefs and cultural backgrounds. It is impossible here to explain thoroughly these positions, but if I only limit myself to the relations of the Republic of Bulgaria, as well as the Bulgarian communities behind the border, I can mention the lack of consistency, being prone to long-lasting prejudices and stereotypes, as well as belonging to a group, including belonging to a party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Greek Occupied Macedonia
    TheTruth about Greek Occupied Macedonia By Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) The Truth about Greek Occupied Macedonia Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2017 by Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov e-book edition January 7, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................6 CHAPTER ONE – Struggle for our own School and Church .......8 1. Macedonian texts written with Greek letters .................................9 2. Educators and renaissance men from Southern Macedonia.........15 3. Kukush – Flag bearer of the educational struggle........................21 4. The movement in Meglen Region................................................33 5. Cultural enlightenment movement in Western Macedonia..........38 6. Macedonian and Bulgarian interests collide ................................41 CHAPTER TWO - Armed National Resistance ..........................47 1. The Negush Uprising ...................................................................47 2. Temporary Macedonian government ...........................................49
    [Show full text]
  • I Macedonia and the Macedonians
    I MACEDONIA AND THE MACEDONIANS The Macedonian People and Macedonian National Consciousness The development of nearly all European peoples and nations has been accompa- nied by numerous and various historical and political difficulties and upheavals. Even in the case of some of the most highly developed modern nations of the European and other continents, history has dictated situations which are not too different from those of the Macedonian people: tribes and ethnicities have become mixed, languages and names have been borrowed, territories and state boundaries have been altered, faiths and cultures have intertwined with each other… Let us take the example of France and the French. The ancient Gaul covered the territory of what is today northern Italy, France, part of Switzerland, Luxem- bourg, Belgium and the Netherlands, and was populated by Gauls, a Roman name designating Celtic tribes. In the 1st century BC Julius Caesar conquered Gaul and it remained within the borders of the Roman Empire up to the end of the 5th century AD. This was a period during which a complex process of assimilation of the Gauls and Romans took place and when Vulgar Latin became the spoken language of the population. It was from this basis that later, influenced by the vernacular of some Germanic tribes, modern French developed. The present-day name of the French derives from the state of the Franks, a group of western Germanic tribes who lived around the River Rhine in what is today Germany and who, towards the late 5th century, conquered almost the whole of ancient Gaul and, by the end of the 8th century, most of Central and Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Year 8 Migrations
    Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences — SIEF Working Group on The Ritual Year Edited by Dobrinka Parusheva and Lina Gergova Sofia • 2014 THE RITUAL YEAR 8 MIGRATIONS The Yearbook of the SIEF Working Group on The Ritual Year Sofia, IEFSEM-BAS, 2014 Peer reviewed articles based on the presentations of the conference in Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 26-29 June 2012 General Editor: Emily Lyle Editors for this issue: Dobrinka Parusheva and Lina Gergova Language editors: Jenny Butler, Molly Carter, Cozette Griffin-Kremer, John Helsloot, Emily Lyle, Neill Martin, Nancy McEntire, David Stanley, Elizabeth Warner Design and layout: Yana Gergova Advisory board: Maria Teresa Agozzino, Marion Bowman, Jenny Butler, Molly Carter, Kinga Gáspár, Evy Håland, Aado Lintrop, Neill Martin, Lina Midholm, Tatiana Minniyakhmetova, David Stanley, Elizabeth Warner The Yearbook is established in 2011 by merging former periodicals dedicated to the study of the Ritual Year: Proceedings of the (5 volumes in 2005–2011). Published by the Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences ISSN 2228-1347 © Authors © Dobrinka Parusheva & Lina Gergova, editors © Yana Gergova, design and layout © SIEF Working Group on The Ritual Year © IEFSEM-BAS CONTENTS Foreword 9 THE SEED-STORE OF THE YEAR Emily Lyle 15 MODERN SPORTS AWARDS CEREMONIES – A GENEALOGICAL ANALYSIS Grigor Har. Grigorov 27 THE RITUAL OF CHANGE IN A REMOTE AREA: CONTEMPORARY ARTS AND THE RENEWAL OF A
    [Show full text]