DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX B: Landscape Planting List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX B: Landscape Planting List APPENDIX B: Landscape Planting List Revised: 03/31/2015 A. Planting Criteria: a. Additions to the plant selection below will be considered through the Variance Request process and proposed species must exclude highly flammable plants, high level allergen trees, plants that attract bees, plants with poison potential, or emit biogenic emissions. Limit plants with stickers or thorns to inaccessible areas to students. b. Select hardy plants that are native and indigenous or adapted to the climate zone, low-water consumptive, drought resistant, and low maintenance. c. Specify plants that are readily available at various local nurseries. B. Shrubs, Groundcover, and Tree Species Analyzed and Acceptable for Use Within the District Include: a. Large Shrubs, 3 to 5-foot high ** Scientific Name Generic Name 1. Ceanothus ‘Celestial Blue’ Celestial Blue Ceanothus 2. Ceanothus ‘Joyce Coulter’ Joyce Coulter Ceanothus 3. Galvezia s. ‘Firecracker’ Island Bush-Snapdragon 4. Photinia x fraseri Photinia 5. Rhaphiolepis indica ‘Clara’ White India Hawthorne 6. Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 7. Phormium New Zealand Flax 8. Pittosporum tobira Variegata b. Medium Shrubs and Grasses (2 to 3-foot high) ** Scientific Name Generic Name 1. Ceanothus g.h. ‘Yankee Point’ Carmel Creeper 2. Dietes bicolor Fortnight Lily 3. Dietes iridioides Fortnight Lily 4. Muhlenbergia capillaris Pink Muhly 5. Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 6. Rhaphiolepis indica ‘Pink Lady’ Pink Lady India Hawthorne 7. Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Prostrata’ Prostrate Rosemary 8. Pittosporum tobira Crème de Mint 9. Rhaphiolepis x delacourii Georgia Petite c. Small Shrubs, Groundcovers, and Succulents (6 inches to 2-foot high) ** Scientific Name Generic Name Long Beach Unified School District Landscape Planting List Facility Design Standards – Appendix “B” March 31, 2015 Page 1 of 6 1. Arctostaphylos ‘Pacific Mist’ Pacific Mist Manzanita 2. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi ‘Point Reyes’ Point Reyes Manzanita 3. Cotoneaster dammeri Bearberry Cotoneaster 4. Cotoneaster dammeri Coral Beauty Cotoneaster 5. Dudleya virens Catalina Island Dudleya 6. Iris douglasiana Pacific Coast Iris 7. Liriope muscari Big Blue Lily Turf 8. Myoporum parvifolia Myoporum 9. Myoporum parvifolium Putah Creek 10. Rosmarinus o. ‘Huntington Carpet’ Dwarf Rosemary 11. Rosmarinus officinalis Roman Beauty 12. Salvia officinalis ‘Tricolor’ Garden Sage 13. Sedum ‘Autumn Joy’ Autumn Joy Stonecrop 14. Sedum rupestre Crooked Stonecrop d. Bioswale Species Scientific Name Generic Name 1. Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa 2. Juncus patens Common Rush 3. Limonium californicum California Sea Lavender 4. Mimulus cardinalis Scarlet Monkeyflower 5. Sisyrinchium bellum Blue-eyed Grass e. Tree Species Scientific Name Generic Name 1. Acer Palmatum Japanese Maple 2. Arbutus Marina Marina Strawberry Tree 3. Arbutus Unedo Strawberry Tree 4. Brachychiton Acerifolius Flame Tree 5. Brachychiton Populneus Bottle Tree 6. Cedrus Atlantica Atlas Cedar 7. Cercis Canadensis Eastern redbud 8. Cercis Occidentalis Western Redbud 9. Citrus Limon* Meyer Lemon 10. Citrus Paradisi* Grapefruit 11. Citrus Sinensis Orange 12. Comarostaphylis Diversifolia Summer Holly 13. Cupressus sempervirens Italian Cypress 14. Fraxinus Dipetala Foothill Ash, California Shrub ash 15. Heteromeles Arbutifolia Toyon, California Holly, Christmas berry Juniperus virginiana 'Canaertii' or 16. 'Chamberlaynii' or 'Pendula Eastern Red Cedar Chamberlaynii' or 'Pendula Virdis' only 17. Koelreuteria Henryi Henry Flame Tree Landscape Planting List Long Beach Unified School District March 31, 2015 Facility Design Standards – Appendix “B” Page 2 of 6 18. Koelreuteria Paniculata Golden Rain Tree 19. Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle or Muskogee or Natchez 20. Liriodendron Tulip Tree 21. Lyonothamnus floribundus Catalina Ironwood 22. Malus sylvestris* Apple Nyssa Sylvatica (FEMALE ONLY - 23. Sour Gum CULTIVAR MISS SCARLET) 24. Persea americana* Avocado 25. Photinia fraseri Common Photina 26. Pinus Mugo Mugo Pine 27. Pittosporum rhombifolia Queensland Pittosporum 28. Pittosporum tobira Tobira Podocarpus Gracillior (FEMALES 29. Fern Pine ONLY) 30. Podocarpus macrophyllus Yew Pine 31. Prunus cerasifera Purple Leaf Plum 32. prunus lusitanica Portugal Laurel 33. Rhaphiolepis Majestic Beauty, Indian Hawthorne 34. Rhaphiolepis indica Indian Hawthorne 35. Stenocarpus Sinuatus Firewheel Tree 36. Tabebuia Impetiginosa Purple Tabebuia 37. Tipuana Tipu Tipu Tree 38. Tristania conferta Brisbane Box * Note: These trees are to be used only when specifically included on the project specific scope. ** Note: Shrubs and groundcover selection and placement are based on the following criteria: 1. Poison potential 2. Allergy Potential 3. Drought Tolerance 4. Maintenance (limited hedging, limited spread, root damage potential) 5. Safety (branch strength, tripping hazards, insect/bee attraction, fire hazard, thorns) 6. Biogenic emissions ***Note: Native plant species to be treated with ectomycorrhizal inoculum are to be used only when specifically included on the project specific scope. Refer to Planting Specifications for more information. C. Tree Species Analyzed and Not Acceptable for Use Within the District Include: Scientific Name Generic Name 1. Abies concolor White Fir 2. Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood Acacia 3. Acacia subporosa River Wattle 4. Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple 5. Acer negundo Box Elder 6. Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 7. Aesculus californica California Buckeye 8. Agonis Flexuosa Peppermint Tree Long Beach Unified School District Landscape Planting List Facility Design Standards – Appendix “B” March 31, 2015 Page 3 of 6 9. Albizia Julibrissin Silk Tree 10. Alnus rhombifolia White Alder 11. Arbutus menziesii Madrone 12. Bauhinia blakeana Hong Kong Orchard Tree 13. Bauhinia Variegata (POISONOUS) White Orchid 14. Betula nigra River birch 15. Callistemon Lemon Bottlebrush 16. Calocedrus Decurrens Incense Cedar 17. Cassia Excelsa (POISONOUS) Crown of Gold 18. Cassia leptophylla Golden Medallion Tree 19. Casuarina cunninghamiana River She-Oak 20. Casuarina equisetifolia Horsetail 21. Casuarina stricta Mountain She-Oak 22. Catalpa Common Catalpa 23. Cedrus Deodara Deodar Cedar 24. Celtis sinensis Chinese Hackberry 25. Ceratonia siliqua Carob 26. Cercidium floridum Blue palo Verde 27. Chorisia insignis White Floss Silk Tree 28. Cinnamomum Camphora Camphor Tree 29. Cupaniopsis Anacardioides Carrot Wood 30. Cupressus glabra Smooth Arizona Cypress 31. Cupressus sempervirens Italian Cypress 32. Elaeagnus Angustifolia Russian Olive 33. Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat 34. Eriobotrya japonica Loquat 35. Fraxinus latifolia Oregon Ash 36. Fraxinus uhdei Mexican Ash 37. Fraxinus velutina Modesto Ash 38. Geijera Parviflora Australian Willow 39. Ginkgo Biloba (FEMALES ONLY) Miadenhair Tree 40. Gleditsia Triacanthos (FEMALES Honey Locust ONLY) 41. Grevillea robusta Silk Oak 42. Harpephyllum Caffrum Wild Plum 43. Hymenosporum flavum Sweetshade 44. Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda 45. Juglans hindsii California Black Walnut 46. Juglans nigra Black Walnut 47. Juglans regia English walnut 48. Juniperus californica California Juniper 49. Juniperus occidentalis Western Juniper 50. Laurus nobilis Sweet bay 51. Leptospermum Australian Tea Tree Landscape Planting List Long Beach Unified School District March 31, 2015 Facility Design Standards – Appendix “B” Page 4 of 6 52. Ligustrum lucidum Glossy Privet 53. Liquidambar Chinese Sweetgum 54. Maytenus Boaria Mayten Tree 55. Melaleuca armillaris Drooping Melaleuca 56. Metrosideros New Zealand Christmas Tree 57. Olea europaea Fruiting Olive 58. Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 59. Pinus densiflora Red Pine 60. Pinus pinea Stone pine 61. Pinus radiata Monterey Pine 62. Pinus sabiniana Gray Pine 63. Pistacia Chinensis Chinese Pistache 64. Pittosporum undulatum Victorian Box 65. Plumeria rubra Frangipani 66. Prunus armeniaca Blenheim Apricot 67. Prunus avium Bing Cherry, Sweet Cherry 68. Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry 69. Prunus domestica Santa Rosa Plum 70. Prunus dulcis Nonpareil Almond 71. Prunus ilicifolia Hollyleaf Cherry 72. Prunus lyonii Catalina Cherry 73. Prunus persica Halford Peach, Peach 74. Prunus serotina Black Cherry 75. Prunus subcordata Sierra Plum 76. Prunus virginiana Choke Cherry 77. Pseudotsuga macrocarpa Bigcone Douglass-Fir 78. Pyrus calleryana Flowering Ornamental Pear 79. Pyrus communis Pear 80. Pyrus kawakamii Evergreen Pear 81. Quercus Kelloggii California Black Oak 82. Quercus Lobata Valley Oak 83. Quercus suber Cork Oak 84. Quercus Wislizenii Interior Live Oak 85. Quercus, Agrifolia Coast Live Oak 86. Rhus lancea African Sumac 87. Rhus ovata Sugarbush 88. Robinia pseudoacacia Black Locust 89. Sambucus caerulea Blue Elderberry 90. sambucus callicarpa Red Coastal Elderberry 91. Sambucus mexicana Hairy Blue Elderberry 92. Sapium sebiferum Chinese Tallow Tree 93. Sapium sebiferum Chinese Tallow Tree 94. Schinus molle California Pepper, Peruvian Pepper 95. Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood Long Beach Unified School District Landscape Planting List Facility Design Standards – Appendix “B” March 31, 2015 Page 5 of 6 96. Sophora Japonica POISONOUS SEED Japanese Pagoda Tree 97. Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar 98. Torreya californica California Nutmeg 99. Ulmus americana American Elm 100. ulmus parvifolia Chinese Elm 101. Zelkova serrata Sawleaf Zelkova Landscape Planting List Long Beach Unified School District March 31, 2015 Facility Design Standards – Appendix “B” Page 6 of 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Malosma Laurina (Nutt.) Nutt. Ex Abrams
    I. SPECIES Malosma laurina (Nutt.) Nutt. ex Abrams NRCS CODE: Family: Anacardiaceae MALA6 Subfamily: Anacardiodeae Order: Sapindales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Immature fruits are green to red in mid-summer. Plants tend to flower in May to June. A. Subspecific taxa none B. Synonyms Rhus laurina Nutt. (USDA PLANTS 2017) C. Common name laurel sumac (McMinn 1939, Calflora 2016) There is only one species of Malosma. Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular data and a combination of D. Taxonomic relationships molecular and structural data place Malosma as distinct but related to both Toxicodendron and Rhus (Miller et al. 2001, Yi et al. 2004, Andrés-Hernández et al. 2014). E. Related taxa in region Rhus ovata and Rhus integrifolia may be the closest relatives and laurel sumac co-occurs with both species. Very early, Malosma was separated out of the genus Rhus in part because it has smaller fruits and lacks the following traits possessed by all species of Rhus : red-glandular hairs on the fruits and axis of the inflorescence, hairs on sepal margins, and glands on the leaf blades (Barkley 1937, Andrés-Hernández et al. 2014). F. Taxonomic issues none G. Other The name Malosma refers to the strong odor of the plant (Miller & Wilken 2017). The odor of the crushed leaves has been described as apple-like, but some think the smell is more like bitter almonds (Allen & Roberts 2013). The leaves are similar to those of the laurel tree and many others in family Lauraceae, hence the specific epithet "laurina." Montgomery & Cheo (1971) found time to ignition for dried leaf blades of laurel sumac to be intermediate and similar to scrub oak, Prunus ilicifolia, and Rhamnus crocea; faster than Heteromeles arbutifolia, Arctostaphylos densiflora, and Rhus ovata; and slower than Salvia mellifera.
    [Show full text]
  • Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R
    Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R. Okie1 U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, 21 Dunbar Road, Byron, GA 31008 Recent utilization of genetic resources of peach [Prunus persica (‘Quetta’ from India, ‘John Rivers’ from England, and ‘Lippiatts’ (L.) Batsch] and Japanese plum (P. salicina Lindl. and hybrids) has from New Zealand) were critical to the development of modern been limited in the United States compared with that of many crops. nectarines in California (Taylor, 1959). However, most fresh-market Difficulties in collection, importation, and quarantine throughput have peach breeding programs in the United States have used germplasm limited the germplasm available. Prunus is more difficult to preserve developed in the United States for cultivar development (Okie, 1998). because more space is needed than for small fruit crops, and the shorter Only in New Jersey was there extensive hybridization with imported life of trees relative to other tree crops because of disease and insect clones, and most of these hybrids have not resulted in named cultivars problems. Lack of suitable rootstocks has also reduced tree life. The (Blake and Edgerton, 1946). trend toward fewer breeding programs, most of which emphasize In recent years, interest in collecting and utilizing novel germplasm “short-term” (long-term compared to most crops) commercial cultivar has increased. For example, non-melting clingstone peaches from development to meet immediate industry needs, has also contributed Mexico and Brazil have been used in the joint USDA–Univ. of to reduced use of exotic material. Georgia–Univ. of Florida breeding program for the development of Probably all modern commercial peaches grown in the United early ripening, non-melting, fresh-market peaches for low-chill areas States are related to ‘Chinese Cling’, a peach imported from China (Beckman and Sherman, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Prunus Ilicifolia (Hooker & Arnott) D. Dietr. Subsp. Ilicifolia, HOLLY
    Prunus ilicifolia (Hooker & Arnott) D. Dietr. subsp. ilicifolia , HOLLY-LEAVED CHERRY, ISLAY . Shrub or small tree, evergreen, sclerophyllous, somewhat spinescent, highly branched and forming a dense canopy, 100–800 cm tall; shoots with dark green foliage, ± folded upward from midrib, with leaves bent downward and hiding stem on water-stressed shrubs, essentially glabrous. Stems: cylindric, when young reddish brown to grayish brown, with odor of bitter almonds (hydrogen cyanide) when scratched; old bark grayish, fairly smooth, with small horizontal lenticels. Leaves: helically alternate, simple, petiolate, with stipules; stipules 2, attached to petiole base, awl-shaped, < 2.5 mm long, entire or sometimes fringed, with some hairs near base, aging purple and early-deciduous; petiole 4–11 mm long, glands absent; blade ovate to round, 16–65 × 12–50 mm, tough, rounded to cordate at base, spinose-dentate or serrate on margins and often wavy, obtuse to rounded or truncate at tip, pinnately veined with midrib raised on lower surface, becoming glabrescent, upper surface initially glossy aging satiny. Inflorescence: raceme or panicle with a central raceme and 2–4 lateral racemes from base, arising mostly from dormant bud prior to vegetative growth, having bud scales at base, each raceme 13–30- flowered, (15–)25–80 × 13–20 mm, flowers ± alternate, bracteate, glabrous to glabrate; bract subtending raceme leaflike but reduced or broadly triangular and 3-toothed at tip; rachis somewhat ridged, glabrous or with widely scattered hairs; bractlet subtending pedicel ± triangular to awl-shaped or cupped-ovate, 0.7–2.6 mm long, light green, deeply 3-toothed with acuminate teeth (basal flowers) to acuminate at tip, sparsely short-ciliate mostly above midpoint, abscising when bud small leaving a raised scar; pedicel 0.2–5 mm long.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pubescent-Fruited Species of Prunus of the Southwestern States
    THE PUBESCENT-FRUITED SPECIES OF PRUNUS OF THE SOUTHWESTERN STATES By SIMS C. MASON, Arboriculturist, Crop Physiology and Breeding Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION The species of the genus Prunus described in this article occupy a unique position in the flora of the western United States from the fact that their relationship with the wild plums of the country is remote and they are more closely allied to some of the Asiatic species of this genus. Their economic importance arises chiefly from their close adaptation to the climatic and soil conditions of the Southwest, where fluctuations of heat and cold, severe drought, and considerable alkalinity of the soil must be endured by most tree crops. Adaptable stocks for the cultivated forms of Prunus capable of meeting such conditions are eagerly sought. Species with such characters which are capable of being hybridized with the old-established cultivated forms of the genus offer attractive possibilities to the plant breeder. This is especially true of the one edible-fruited form, Prunus texana, which affords in aroma and flavor of fruit most attractive characters for combi- nation with other stone fruits of larger size and more staple commercial character. Instead of forming a homogeneous group, as has usually been be- lieved, these species fall into small groups of quite diverse character and affinities. To the plant breeder and student of their economic possibilities these relationships are of such importance that the following detailed study of them is deemed essential
    [Show full text]
  • Taming the Wild Beach Plum
    Taming the Wild Beach Plum Richard H. Uva Beach plum is a conspicuous shrub of coastal plant communities in the north- eastern United States because of its prolific bloom, prized fruit, and perseverance in a seemingly hostile environment. Several attempts have been made to bring this wild fruit into cultivation. ’ve known the beach plum (Prunus maritima Marsh.) I since childhood on Cape Cod, where it was the only woody plant in the sea of dune grass that sepa- rated the ocean from the rest of the world. Michael Dirr writes in his Manual of Cultivated Plants that “This species abounds on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and is one of the Cape Codder’s cher- ALL PHOTOGRAPHS ARE BY THE AUTHOR ished plants.” In fact, I would say that Cape Codders feel a sense of entitlement to the species and its fruit. The beach plum is much appreciated for its profuse white bloom in spring, but it is in late summer, when people gather the fruit from the wild for jelly and other preserves, that its impor- The fruits of Prunus maritima are small plums—one-half to an inch (1.5 to tance to the local culture becomes 2.5 cm) in diameter—that ripen from late August through September. most apparent. The long-time gatherers have secret spots and favorite bushes, breviligulata), beach pea (Lathyrus maritimus), and strangers carrying pails in the dunes are and seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). viewed with suspicion. In a good crop year the When I learned that William Clark of the Cape race to harvest is so competitive that the fruit Cod Cooperative Extension and a small group of is sometimes picked when barely ripe.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POL&IHATXON STATUS of PRUNUS SUBCQRDATA by LEWIS
    THE POL&IHATXON STATUS OF PRUNUS SUBCQRDATA by LEWIS ANGLE BAMMEfiS A THESIS submittod to 0KEO0M STATE COLt«EGB in partial fulfillsont of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIBSCI June 1949 APPROVED: Head of pe^artment of Horticulture In Charge of Major ... i tyf fin' i in — w—r i ,.,... i Chairman of School Graduate Committee ' -*• .~.- -— ^. ^. ^^_^y^ Dean of Graduate School 7— 3" ; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his grateful appre- ciation for the valuable assistance rendered by the many persons cooperating in this atudy* He is particularly Indebted to Professor Henry Hartmen, whose guidance and generous help carried this work to its completion. To A* H. Roberts, Assistant Horticulturaliat of the Experi- ment Station, the author is deeply indebted for helpful assistance in all phases of the problem without which the study would not have reached a successful conclusion, L. A, H. Tmm OF CONTESTS Paga Introduction ..*.......... 1 History ............ 1 Burbank^s work with the wild plum » ... 1 Sisson plvtm ............ 2 Botanical Bascription * . ........ 4 Original desorlption ....»...* 4 Sargent's description. ....*.•. 4 Variety g^lloggii ....... ♦ . 9 Variety ftyegana ...... * -« . 10 Delimitations ............. 11 Variety selection and testing * . * . II Follina^ion studies ......... 11 Rootstook studies ••...••... 11 Botanical relationship and aeearate descriptions. • • . • « • • . 11 Origin of hybrid types . « . ♦ « » . * IS Seed or Timeliness of The Study •s; Development of plum in southern Oregon ... IS Orchard culture in XaUfce County . , . * 13 Distribution • . • . • . Sarly writers* reports ........ 15 Soil preference ...» « . • . 16 Most productive plants . .♦».♦. 16 Factor of location ......... 16 fruit Setting .......... 19 Processes taking place within the flower . * 19 Formation of pollen and embryo sac * ..
    [Show full text]
  • Rhamnus Crocea Nutt
    I.SPECIES Rhamnus crocea Nutt. and Rhamnus ilicifolia Kellogg NRCS CODE: Family: Rhamnaceae 1. RHCR Order: Rhamnales 2. RHIL Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Rhamnus crocea, San Bernardino Co., 5 June 2015, A. Montalvo Rhamnus ilicifolia, Riverside Co., Rhamnus ilicifolia, Riverside Co. Note the finely serrulate leaf 10 June 2015. A. Montalvo margins. 7 March 2008. A. Montalvo A. Subspecific taxa 1. None recognized by Sawyer (2012b) or in 2019 Jepson e-Flora whereas R. pilosa is recognized as R. c. 1. RHCR Nutt. subsp. pilosa (Trel.) C.B. Wolf in the PLANTS database (USDA PLANTS 2018). 2. RHIL 2. None B. Synonyms 1. RHCR 1 . Rhamnus croceus (spelling variant noted by FNA 2018) 2. RHIL 2. Rhamnus crocea Nutt. subsp. ilicifolia (Kellogg) C.B. Wolf; R. c. Nutt. var. ilicifolia (Kellogg) Greene (USDA PLANTS 2018) last modified: 3/4/2020 RHCR RHIL, page 1 printed: 3/10/2020 C. Common name The name red-berry, redberry, redberry buckthorn, California red-berry, evergreen buckthorn, spiny buckthorn, and hollyleaf buckthorn have been used for multiple taxa of Rhamnus (Painter 2016 a,b) 1. RHCR 1. Spiny redberry (Sawyer 2012a); also little-leaved redberry (Painter 2016a) 2. RHIL 2. Hollyleaf redberry (Sawyer 2012b); also holly-leaf buckthorn, holly-leaf coffeeberry (Painter 2016b) D. Taxonomic relationships There are about 150 species of Rhamnus worldwide and 14 in North America, 6 of which were introduced from other continents (Nesom & Sawyer 2018, FNA). This is after splitting the genus into Rhamnus (buckthorns and redberries) and Frangula (coffeeberries) based on a combination of fruit, leaf venation, and flower traits (Johnston 1975, FNA).
    [Show full text]
  • Heteromeles Arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) Photos: A
    I. SPECIES Heteromeles arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) photos: A. Montalvo Order: Rosales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Fruits (pomes) in late fall and winter. A. Subspecific taxa None recognized by Phipps (2012, 2016) in Jepson Manual or Jepson e-Flora. B. Synonyms Photinia arbutifolia (Ait.) Lindl.; Crataegus arbutifolia Ait. (McMinn 1939) Heteromeles (Lindl.) M. Roemer arbutifolia var. arbutifolia ; H. a. var. cerina (Jeps.) E. Murray; H. a. var. macrocarpa (Munz) Munz; H. salicifolia (C. Presl) Abrams (Phipps 2016) (but see I. F. Taxonomic issues). C. Common name toyon, California Christmas berry, California-holly (Painter 2016); Christmas berry (CalFlora 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and morphological data confirm thatPhotinia is the most closely related genus (Guo et al. 2011). Photinia differs in having 20 stamens, fused carpels, and stone cells in the testa as well as occurring in summer-wet environments (Phipps 1992). E. Related taxa in region None. There is only one species of Heteromeles. The closely related Photinia is primarily tropical (Meyer 2008) and not in California. Toyon's taxonomic stability may be in part related to its reproductive mode (Wells 1969). F. Taxonomic issues The three varieties of H. arbutifolia listed above in cell I. B. are currently recognized in the USDA PLANTS (2016) database. G. Other One of the most widely distributed California shrubs. Also widely planted and well-known for its bright red fruits in winter. McMinn (1939) noted it had been planted widely in parks and gardens since about 1914. From the Greek words 'heter' for different and 'malus' for apple (Munz 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • We Hope You Find This Field Guide a Useful Tool in Identifying Native Shrubs in Southwestern Oregon
    We hope you find this field guide a useful tool in identifying native shrubs in southwestern Oregon. 2 This guide was conceived by the “Shrub Club:” Jan Walker, Jack Walker, Kathie Miller, Howard Wagner and Don Billings, Josephine County Small Woodlands Association, Max Bennett, OSU Extension Service, and Brad Carlson, Middle Rogue Watershed Council. Photos: Text: Jan Walker Max Bennett Max Bennett Jan Walker Financial support for this guide was contributed by: • Josephine County Small • Silver Springs Nursery Woodlands Association • Illinois Valley Soil & Water • Middle Rogue Watershed Council Conservation District • Althouse Nursery • OSU Extension Service • Plant Oregon • Forest Farm Nursery Acknowledgements Helpful technical reviews were provided by Chris Pearce and Molly Sullivan, The Nature Conservancy; Bev Moore, Middle Rogue Watershed Council; Kristi Mergenthaler and Rachel Showalter, Bureau of Land Management. The format of the guide was inspired by the OSU Extension Service publication Trees to Know in Oregon by E.C. Jensen and C.R. Ross. Illustrations of plant parts on pages 6-7 are from Trees to Know in Oregon (used by permission). All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Book formatted & designed by: Flying Toad Graphics, Grants Pass, Oregon, 2007 3 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 4 Plant parts ................................................................................... 6 How to use the dichotomous keys ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Resource Exploitation on Santa Cruz Island, California: Macrobotanical Data from Four Middle Holocene Sites
    Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist Volume 7 8th California Islands Symposium Article 7 8-14-2014 Terrestrial resource exploitation on Santa Cruz Island, California: macrobotanical data from four Middle Holocene sites Kristin M. Hoppa University of California, Santa Barbara, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mwnan Recommended Citation Hoppa, Kristin M. (2014) "Terrestrial resource exploitation on Santa Cruz Island, California: macrobotanical data from four Middle Holocene sites," Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 7 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mwnan/vol7/iss1/7 This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist 7, © 2014, pp. 109–117 TERRESTRIAL RESOURCE EXPLOITATION ON SANTA CRUZ ISLAND, CALIFORNIA: MACROBOTANICAL DATA FROM FOUR MIDDLE HOLOCENE SITES Kristin M. Hoppa1 ABSTRACT.—On the northern Channel Islands, the occupation of interior sites during the Middle Holocene (6650–3350 cal BP) has been attributed, in part, to terrestrial resource exploitation. The presence of groundstone artifacts, particu- larly mortars and pestles, in Middle Holocene sites and burials supports the idea that plants were important during this time period. The current study presents macrobotanical data from 4 Middle Holocene sites on Santa Cruz Island. Of the 4 sites, 3 are located within the Central Valley, the island’s most productive watershed; whereas the fourth site is located on a coastal bluff on the eastern end of the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemonade Berry
    Native Plants in the South Pasadena Nature Park - #1 Powerpoint Presentation and Photographs by Barbara Eisenstein, October 23, 2012 To identify plants use some of your senses (and your common sense): Look at: plant size and shape ۵ leaf size, shape, color, texture and arrangement ۵ flower types, color, arrangement ۵ Touch (with care): fuzzy or smooth leaves ۵ stiff or flexible stems ۵ Smell: Many California plants have very distinctive odors especially in their leaves ۵ Some weeds are easily distinguished from natives by their smell ۵ Taste: !!!Never taste a plant you are unsure of. Some plants are poisonous ۵ Listen: .Rustling leaves can be hint ۵ NATIVE TREES AND LARGE SHRUBS • Coast live oak • Sugar bush • Engelmann oak • Laurel sumac • So. CA black walnut • Lemonade berry • Western sycamore • Yellow willow • Blue elderberry • Holly-leaf cherry • Toyon NATIVE Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) • Key Identifying Traits: Broad, evergreen oak tree with dark green leaves. Leaves cupped, green above, usually lighter beneath, with spines on margin Trunk is massive with gray bark. Tree, height: up to 30’, width: 35’ • Other facts: Magnificent native tree. Resistant to many pests and diseases but susceptible to oak root fungus (Armillaria mellea). To protect from root fungus, water established trees infrequently but deeply and avoid summer water. • May be confused with: Other oaks. Cupped leaves with spiny margins distinguish this oak. Bark is often smooth gray but in mature trees can be rough and variable. NATIVE Engelmann oak (Quercus engelmannii) • Key Identifying Traits: Drought deciduous tree, height: rarely taller than 40 ft., width: mature tree broader than tall.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FLORISTICS of the CALIFORNIA ISLANDS Peter H
    THE FLORISTICS OF THE CALIFORNIA ISLANDS Peter H. Raven Stanford University The Southern California Islands, with their many endemic spe­ cies of plants and animals, have long attracted the attention of biologists. This archipelago consists of two groups of islands: the Northern Channel Islands and the Southern Channel Islands. The first group is composed of San Miguel, Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz, and Anacapa islands; the greatest water gap between these four is about 6 miles, and the distance of the nearest, Anacapa, from the mainland only about 13 miles. In the southern group there are also four islands: San Clemente, Santa Catalina, Santa Bar­ bara, and San Nicolas. These are much more widely scattered than the islands of the northern group; the shortest distance be­ tween them is the 21 miles separating the islands of San Clemente and Santa Catalina, and the nearest island to the mainland is Santa Catalina, some 20 miles off shore. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the complex floristics of the vascular plants found on this group of islands, and this will be done from three points of view. First will be considered the numbers of species of vascular plants found on each island, then the endemics of these islands, and finally the relationship between the island and mainland localities for these plants. By critically evaluating the accounts of Southern California island plants found in the published works of Eastwood (1941), Mill¬ spaugh and Nuttall (1923), Munz (1959), and Raven (1963), one can derive a reasonably accurate account of the plants of the area.
    [Show full text]