DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenya National Biodiversity Threat Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kenya National Biodiversity Threat Assessment Kenya National Biodiversity Threat Assessment Direct Human Threats Impacting Kenya’s Biodiversity 1st September 2020 The report was prepared by Masumi S. Gudka for IUCN – BIODEV2030 Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ c Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................................................ e Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology, Results & Analyses ................................................................................................. 1 Conclusion & Recommendations................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 BIODEV2030: Mainstreaming Biodiversity into Key Economic Sectors ................................... 5 1.2 BIODEV2030: Supporting Kenya Vision 2030 ......................................................................... 6 1.3 Purpose of the Assessment ..................................................................................................... 8 2. Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Conceptual Framework and Definitions ................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Data Collection ...................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Biodiversity Status and Trends........................................................................................ 11 2.2.2 Biodiversity Threat Assessment – National Level ............................................................ 11 2.2.3 Biodiversity Threat Assessment – County Level ............................................................. 15 3. Biodiversity Status & Trends ................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Scope of the Assessment ...................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Ecosystem Approach and Ecological Zones .......................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Ecoregions ...................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.2 Realms, Biomes, and Ecosystems .................................................................................. 19 A. Terrestrial Realm ................................................................................................................. 20 B. Freshwater Realm ............................................................................................................... 21 C. Marine Realm ...................................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Biological Target: Ecosystem ................................................................................................ 22 3.3.1 Coral Reef Status and Trends ......................................................................................... 22 3.4 Species Approach - Flora and Fauna .................................................................................... 23 3.4.1 Biological Targets: Taxonomic Groups ............................................................................ 25 A. Mammals - Status & Trends ................................................................................................ 25 B. Birds (Avifauna) – Status & Trends ...................................................................................... 30 C. Amphibians – Status & Trends ............................................................................................ 35 D. Fish – Status & Trends ........................................................................................................ 39 E. Plants – Status & Trends ..................................................................................................... 42 3.5 Areas of Conservation Importance ........................................................................................ 43 a 3.5.1 Key Biodiversity Areas .................................................................................................... 43 3.5.2 Protected Areas .............................................................................................................. 44 4. Threat Assessment Results ..................................................................................................... 48 4.1 National Level ....................................................................................................................... 48 4.1.1 STAR Metric - Kenya Scores .......................................................................................... 48 4.1.2 Expert-based Threat Assessment Tool (EbTAT) ............................................................. 50 A. Residential and Commercial Development .......................................................................... 50 B. Agriculture and Aquaculture ................................................................................................ 51 C. Energy Production & Mining ................................................................................................ 52 D. Transportation & Service Corridors ..................................................................................... 53 E. Biological Resource Use ..................................................................................................... 54 F. Human Intrusions & Disturbance ......................................................................................... 57 G. Natural System Modification ................................................................................................ 58 H. Invasive & Other Problematic Species, Genes & Diseases ................................................. 58 I. Pollution ................................................................................................................................ 59 J. Climate Change & Severe Weather ..................................................................................... 61 4.1.3 Simplified Threat Assessment Tool (STAT)..................................................................... 62 4.2 County Level ......................................................................................................................... 64 4.2.1 Case Study 1: Nyandarua County ................................................................................... 64 4.2.2 Case Study 2: Taita Taveta County ................................................................................ 66 5. Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 68 5.6 Study Limitations ...................................................................................................................... 77 7. Recomendations ....................................................................................................................... 79 8. Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 80 9. Appendices .................................................................................................................................. i b Acknowledgements Masumi Gudka and the IUCN BIODEV2030 Project Team Kaori Yasuda, Florence Curet, and Philippe Puydarrieux would like to sincerely thank the following people and institutions for their support with this biodiversity threat assessment: Lucy Ng’ang’a and Kennedy Olwasi from the Ministry of Environment & Forestry, key members of the 6th National Report on Biodiversity, Karin Boomsma, and Stella Ndirangu from Kenya Private Sector Alliance (KEPSA) – Sustainable Inclusive Business (SIB), Estelle Halimi, Kim Ramoneda, and Claire Fisnot from the French Embassy, Nyokabi Gitahi, and Mariette Sanson from the French Development Agency (AFD), and IUCN Kenya Members who attended the Members Meeting on the 9th of March 2020. A special thank you to all the assessment contributors and assessors who willingly made time to support this study and freely shared their knowledge and opinions by undertaking the biodiversity threat assessment. Your commitment and support have been most deeply appreciated. Biodiversity Threat Assessment Contributors and Assessors Dr Abdullahi Hussein Ali Hirola Conservation Programme Dr Beryl Bwong National Museums of Kenya Cyrus Mageria Ministry of Environment and Forestry Dr Darcy Ogada The Peregrine Fund Don Turner Nature Kenya Bird Committee Ebenezer Amadi Kenya Private Sector Alliance Elizabeth Mueni Kenya Fisheries Service Eunice Robai African Network for Animal Welfare Fleur Ngweno Nature Kenya Dr Gladys Okemwa Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Soe Ch4 A
    PART 2 STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT 61 CHAPTER BIODIVERSITY4 Introduction The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defi nes biodiversity as Kenya’s rich biodiversity Lead Authors ‘the variability among living organisms from all sources including, can be attributed to a number Ali A. Ali and Monday S. Businge among others, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and of factors, including a long Contributing Authors S. M. Mutune, Jane Kibwage, Ivy Achieng, the ecological complexes of which they are part [and] includes diversity evolutionary history, variable Godfrey Mwangi, David Ongare, Fred Baraza, within species, between species and of ecosystems.’ Biodiversity climatic conditions, and diverse Teresa Muthui, Lawrence M. Ndiga, Nick Mugi therefore comprises genetic and species diversity of animals and plants habitat types and ecosystems. Reviewer as well as ecosystem diversity. Kenya is endowed with an enormous The major biodiversity Nathan Gichuki diversity of ecosystems and wildlife species which live in the terrestrial, concentration sites fall within aquatic and aerial environment. These biological resources are the existing protected areas fundamental to national prosperity as a source of food, medicines, network (national parks, reserves and sanctuaries) which are mostly energy, shelter, employment and foreign exchange. For instance, managed by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS). However, over 70 percent agricultural productivity and development are dependent on the of the national biodiversity occurs outside the protected areas. availability of a wide variety of plant and animal genetic resources and In spite of its immense biotic capital, Kenya experiences severe on the existence of functional ecological systems, especially those that ecological and socio-economic problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Biology and Taxonomy. Mudskippers
    Chapter of the edited collection: Mangroves: Ecology, Biology and Taxonomy. Mudskippers: human use, ecotoxicology and biomonitoring of mangrove and other soft bottom intertidal ecosystems. Gianluca Polgar 1 and Richard Lim 2 1Institute of Biological Sciences, Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel. +603-7967-4609 / 4182; e-mail: [email protected] / [email protected]. Web site: www.themudskipper.org 2Centre for Environmental Sustainability, School of the Environment, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia. e-mail: [email protected] Abstract (269) Mudskippers (Gobiidae: Oxudercinae) are air-breathing gobies, which are widely distributed throughout the West African coast and the Indo-Pacific region. They are closely linked to mangrove and adjacent soft bottom peri-tidal ecosystems. Some species are amongst the best adapted fishes to an amphibious lifestyle. All mudskippers are benthic burrowers in anoxic sediments, and since tidal mudflats are efficient sediment traps, and sinks for nutrients and other chemical compounds, they are constantly in contact with several types of pollutants produced by industrial, agricultural and domestic activities. Due to their natural abundance, considerable resistance to highly polluted conditions, and their benthic habits, mudskippers are frequently used in aquatic ecotoxicological studies. For the same reasons, mudskippers also frequently occur in urbanised or semi-natural coastal areas. Since several species are widely consumed throughout their whole geographical range, these same characteristics also facilitate their aquaculture in several countries, such as Bangladesh, Thailand, Philippines, China, Taiwan and Japan. Even when not directly used, mudskippers are often abundant and are important prey items for many intertidal transient species (marine visitors), and several species of shorebirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for the Inclusion of Species on the Appendices of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
    1 / 2 Proposal II/7 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF SPECIES ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: Listing the entire population of Glareola nuchalis on Appendix II. B. PROPONENT: Government of Kenya. C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT: 1. Taxon: 1.1 Class: Aves 1.2 Order: Charadriiformes 1.3 Family: Glareolidae 1.4 Genus/species/subspecies: Glareola nuchalis 1.5 Common names: English: Rock Pratincole, White-collared Pratincole French: Glarède aureole 2. Biological data 2.1 Distribution Distributed in West and central Africa. Scarce in eastern Africa. 2.2 Population No detailed census data available, but the best guess information available puts the number at >25,000 within its distribution range. 2.3 Habitat Exposed rocks in large rivers and streams used for breeding. May rest on sandbars, when rivers flood. Also found in coastal localities and other inland waters. 2.4 Migrations Locally common resident and regular intra-African migrant. Migrates within its distribution range. Most post breeding dispersal occurs during the wet season. 3. Threat data 3.1 Direct threats Unpredictable fluctuations of water levels of local rivers during breeding seasons affect the breeding performance. Sand mining along rivers has severe impacts on the availability of suitable habitats in the riparian areas for nesting. 3.2 Habitat destruction Riparian land use activities within the range states limits the availability of suitable roosting and nesting areas along rivers. 3.3 Indirect threats The loss and degradation of catchments for all wetlands within its range. 3.4 Threats connected especially with migrations None known.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioseries12-Amphibians-Taita-English
    0c m 12 Symbol key 3456 habitat pond puddle river stream 78 underground day / night day 9101112131415161718 night altitude high low vegetation types shamba forest plantation prelim pages ENGLISH.indd ii 2009/10/22 02:03:47 PM SANBI Biodiversity Series Amphibians of the Taita Hills by G.J. Measey, P.K. Malonza and V. Muchai 2009 prelim pages ENGLISH.indd Sec1:i 2009/10/27 07:51:49 AM SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 September 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and ora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editor: Gerrit Germishuizen Design & layout: Elizma Fouché Cover design: Elizma Fouché How to cite this publication MEASEY, G.J., MALONZA, P.K. & MUCHAI, V. 2009. Amphibians of the Taita Hills / Am bia wa milima ya Taita. SANBI Biodiversity Series 12. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Gtr Pnw343.Pdf
    Abstract Marcot, Bruce G. 1995. Owls of old forests of the world. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW- GTR-343. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 64 p. A review of literature on habitat associations of owls of the world revealed that about 83 species of owls among 18 genera are known or suspected to be closely asso- ciated with old forests. Old forest is defined as old-growth or undisturbed forests, typically with dense canopies. The 83 owl species include 70 tropical and 13 tem- perate forms. Specific habitat associations have been studied for only 12 species (7 tropical and 5 temperate), whereas about 71 species (63 tropical and 8 temperate) remain mostly unstudied. Some 26 species (31 percent of all owls known or sus- pected to be associated with old forests in the tropics) are entirely or mostly restricted to tropical islands. Threats to old-forest owls, particularly the island forms, include conversion of old upland forests, use of pesticides, loss of riparian gallery forests, and loss of trees with cavities for nests or roosts. Conservation of old-forest owls should include (1) studies and inventories of habitat associations, particularly for little-studied tropical and insular species; (2) protection of specific, existing temperate and tropical old-forest tracts; and (3) studies to determine if reforestation and vege- tation manipulation can restore or maintain habitat conditions. An appendix describes vocalizations of all species of Strix and the related genus Ciccaba. Keywords: Owls, old growth, old-growth forest, late-successional forests, spotted owl, owl calls, owl conservation, tropical forests, literature review.
    [Show full text]
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Rodi Omondi Ojoo
    Dr. Rodi Omondi Ojoo Contacts: Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology University of Nairobi P.O.Box 30197- 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Telephone: +2542 4442014/5/6 ext 2300 Cell No: 0722679680 Fax: + 2542 4451770 Email: [email protected] Education: Ph.D. Veterinary Anatomy (Reproductive Biology ), University of Nairobi, Kenya, 2006. M.Sc. Veterinary Anatomy (Reproductive Biology), University of Nairobi, 1996. B.V.M. University of Nairobi, 1990. Positions held: 1996- 2014: Lecturer in Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology, University of Nairobi 1990-1996: Assistant lecturer in Department of Veterinary Anatomy of University of Nairobi. 1985-1986: Research assistant for 7 months at the Biomedical Research Centre of the Kenya Medical Research Institute. Professional affiliations: Member of the Kenya Veterinary Association Veterinary Surgeon registered by the Kenya Veterinary Board as No. 1289 Duties: Lectures and examination (Veterinary Anatomy) of Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine and BSc. Wildlife Management, undergraduate students. Lectures and examination of Reproductive biology to postgraduate students Have been member of boards for examination of a number of MSc. Students. Have been internal examiner of MSc. Thesis Other responsibilities: - Chairman, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Biosafety, Animal use and Ethics Committee - Reviewer for the Kenya Veterinarian, a Journal of the Kenya Veterinary Association Publications: Theses: 1. Ojoo, R.O. (2006) Comparison and characterisation of specific fertilisation proteins in human (Homo sapiens) and baboon (Papio anubis) spermatozoa. Ph.D thesis , University of Nairobi. 2. Ojoo, R.O. (1995) A morphological and endocrinological study of the male reproductive system of the male reproductive system of the thick-tailed bush baby (Galago garnetti).
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Checklists of the World Country Or Region: Ghana
    Avibase Page 1of 24 Col Location Date Start time Duration Distance Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World 1 Country or region: Ghana 2 Number of species: 773 3 Number of endemics: 0 4 Number of breeding endemics: 0 5 Number of globally threatened species: 26 6 Number of extinct species: 0 7 Number of introduced species: 1 8 Date last reviewed: 2019-11-10 9 10 Recommended citation: Lepage, D. 2021. Checklist of the birds of Ghana. Avibase, the world bird database. Retrieved from .https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?lang=EN&region=gh [26/09/2021]. Make your observations count! Submit your data to ebird.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]