Team Valley Flood Alleviation Project Strategic Outline Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Team Valley Flood Alleviation Project Strategic Outline Case Team Valley Flood Alleviation Project Strategic Outline Case Version No: 1 Date: 6 April 2017 Team Valley Flood Alleviation Scheme Page 1 of 40 FINANCIAL SCHEME OF DELEGATION (FSoD) APPROVALS 1. Project name Team Valley Flood Alleviation Scheme Project ref. Project Code ENVIMNE640128 Start date April 2015 Programme Capital GiA and Local Levy End date March 2021 Hub or Head Environment Agency For FSOD use only Office Area name Northumbria, Durham and Tees FSoD reference F/1718/0172 Function FCRM FSoD Date 2. % time allocated to Role Name Post Title project Project Sponsor Oliver Harmar Deputy Director 2% Project Executive Leila Huntington FCRM Area Manager 5% Project Manager Tina Robinson PSO Advisor 50% 3. Risk Potential Assessment (RPA) Category Low Medium High 4. Delegation FSoD schedule Description National – up to Area – up to A1 Projects (includes FCRM revenue) £5m £5m A2 FCRM capital project within approved strategy £100m WLC Defra £10m A3 FCRM capital project outside of approved strategy £100m WLC Defra £5m A5 Consultancy project £500k £500k T2 Corporate Property Projects /acquisitions £5m £5m 5. FSoD value £k Strategic Outline Case (SOC) FSoD reference £451 Full Business Case (FBC) FSoD reference £8,343 Whole Life Costs (WLC) of Project (if applicable) Financial benefits £288,921 Non-financial benefits Yes 6. N/A Low Medium High Required level of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) 7. NPAS/LPRG chair Post title Assurance confirmation Date Phil Foxley Lead Assurer RED AMBER X GREEN 8. FSoD approver(s) name Post title Emailed approval Date Oliver Harmer Area Director See below 5/7/17 9. Latest FSoD authorised cost Form G Form G value (£k) FSoD ref. (£k) 1 2 3 Team Valley Flood Alleviation Scheme Page 2 of 40 10. For FSoD Coordinator use only: From: Harmar, Oliver P Sent: 05 July 2017 08:33 To: Huntington, Leila <leila.huntington@environment‐agency.gov.uk> Cc: National Project Assurance Service <NPAS@environment‐agency.gov.uk> Subject: RE: Assurance complete Team Valley FAS SOC Hi Leila, Thanks for the response and I am happy for the project to proceed. I have copied in NPAS to mmake the aware. Oliver Team Valley Flood Alleviation Scheme Page 3 of 40 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2. THE ECONOMIC CASE ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS TABLE 2: CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS .................................................... 17 2.3. LONG LIST OPTIONS ................................................................................................................................... 18 2.4. SHORT LISTING OF OPTION ......................................................................................................................... 23 2.5. ECONOMIC APPRAISAL ............................................................................................................................... 24 2.6. NON FINANCIAL BENEFITS APPRAISAL ........................................................................................................ 26 2.7. PREFERRED OPTION ................................................................................................................................... 27 3. THE COMMERCIAL CASE ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.1. INTRODUCTION AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY ........................................................................................ 27 3.2. KEY CONTRACTUAL TERMS & RISK ALLOCATION ........................................................................................ 27 3.3. PROCUREMENT ROUTE AND TIMESCALES................................................................................................... 28 3.4. EFFICIENCIES AND COMMERCIAL ISSUES .................................................................................................... 28 4. THE FINANCIAL CASE ...................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1. FINANCIAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 28 4.2. FUNDING SOURCES .................................................................................................................................... 29 4.3. IMPACT ON REVENUE AND BALANCE SHEET ................................................................................................ 30 4.4. OVERALL AFFORDABILITY ........................................................................................................................... 30 5. THE MANAGEMENT CASE ................................................................................................................................ 30 5.1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 30 5.2. COMMUNICATIONS AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................... 34 5.3. CHANGE MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 34 5.4. BENEFITS REALISATION .............................................................................................................................. 35 5.5. RISK MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................... 39 5.6. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................................... 39 5.7. ASSURANCE ............................................................................................................................................... 39 5.8. POST PROJECT EVALUATION ...................................................................................................................... 39 5.9. CONTINGENCY PLANS ................................................................................................................................ 39 Tables Table 1 – Main risks Table 2 – Critical success factors Table 3 – Long list of options Table 4 – Option ranking Table 5 – Non FDGiA benefits Table 6 – Preferred option Table 7 – Proposed expenditure Table 8 – FDGiA, partnership funding, Local Levy and ESIF/ERDF for Team Valley Table 9 – Project roles and responsibilities Table 10 – Extract from the Project Appraisal Plan Table 11 – Benefits realisation Table 12 – Key risks Figures Figure 1 – Construction of Team Valley including the culverting of Team Valley Figure 2 – HSBC flooded or the 2nd time in 2012 and Cromwell Tools Figure 3 – Trash screens at Eslington Culvert Figure 4 – Flood risk for Team Valley baseline 1% AEP Team Valley Flood Alleviation Scheme Page 4 of 40 Figure 5 – Team Valley Water Courses Appendices Appendix 1 - Team Valley Flood Alleviation Schemes (Map 1) Appendix 2 – Team Valley Flood Alleviation Schemes (Map 2) Appendix 3 – Team Valley Flood Alleviation Schemes (Map 3) Appendix 4 – Project efficiencies Appendix 5 – PF Calculator Appendix 6 – Communications and Stakeholder Engagement Plan Appendix 7 – Risk Register Appendix 8 – Project Assurance Plan Team Valley Flood Alleviation Scheme Page 5 of 40 Executive Summary The Team Valley Flood Alleviation project will provide protection for a regionally important employment centre and residential homes; 464 properties are risk from a 1%AEP event including 14 residential and 450 non-residential properties. There are over 700 businesses on Team Valley employing over 20,000 people. Gateshead Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority have identified that it is ‘strategically important to protect and enhance Team Valley Industrial Estate … as it continues to be a major economic driver’, Gateshead and Newcastle Core Strategy 3. This Strategic Outline Case has been written to set out the case for additional resources to be made available for further development of the Team Valley Flood Alleviation Project. The original Form A for £90k was authorised by the Area Flood & Coastal Risk Manager (AFCRM) for Northumbria, Durham and Tees on the 5 November 2014. Following this Capita were appointed to develop the economic case and the PAR for Team Valley. Their scope of work included: Identification and assessment of a shortlist of options to reduce flood risk to Team Valley; Review of previous feasibility reports avoiding a duplication of work where possible; Consideration of a flood warning system for Team Valley; Assessment of the opportunity to boost economic development and examine the negative impact of previous flood events; and Evaluation of options providing multiple benefits of options, assessing their contribution to WFD outcomes, the provision of green infrastructure and access to local nature reserves, tourism and heritage. Capita have successfully identified a series of schemes that could be implemented across the catchment. These projects provide multiple benefits from a flood alleviation and environmental perspective. However, the overall
Recommended publications
  • Tyne Estuary Partnership Report FINAL3
    Tyne Estuary Partnership Feasibility Study Date GWK, Hull and EA logos CONTENTS CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 2 PART 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 6 Structure of the Report ...................................................................................................... 6 Background ....................................................................................................................... 7 Vision .............................................................................................................................. 11 Aims and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 11 The Partnership ............................................................................................................... 13 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 14 PART 2: STRATEGIC CONTEXT ....................................................................................... 18 Understanding the River .................................................................................................. 18 Landscape Character ...................................................................................................... 19 Landscape History ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Notes and Local Details for 1:Loooo Sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE Newcastle Upon Tyne and Gateshead
    Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Geological Survey of England and Wales Geological notes and local details for 1:lOOOO sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead Part of 1:50000 sheets 14 (Morpeth), 15 (Tynemouth), 20 (Newcastle upon Tyne) and 21 (Sunderland) G. Richardson with contributions by D. A. C. Mills Bibliogrcphic reference Richardson, G. 1983. Geological notes and local details for 1 : 10000 sheets NZ26NW, NE, SW and SE (Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead) (Keyworth: Institute of Geological Sciences .) Author G. Richardson Institute of Geological Sciences W indsorTerrace, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HE Production of this report was supported by theDepartment ofthe Environment The views expressed in this reportare not necessarily those of theDepartment of theEnvironment - 0 Crown copyright 1983 KEYWORTHINSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICALSCIENCES 1983 PREFACE "his account describes the geology of l:25 000 sheet NZ 26 which spans the adjoining corners of l:5O 000 geological sheets 14 (Morpeth), 15 (Tynemouth), 20 (Newcastle upon Tyne) and sheet 22 (Sunderland). The area was first surveyed at a scale of six inches to one mile by H H Howell and W To~ley. Themaps were published in the old 'county' series during the years 1867 to 1871. During the first quarter of this century parts of the area were revised but no maps were published. In the early nineteen twenties part of the southern area was revised by rcJ Anderson and published in 1927 on the six-inch 'County' edition of Durham 6 NE. In the mid nineteen thirties G Burnett revised a small part of the north of the area and this revision was published in 1953 on Northumberland New 'County' six-inch maps 85 SW and 85 SE.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND SECURITIES Report and Financial Statements 31 March 1999
    LAND SECURITIES Report and Financial Statements 31 March 1999 Home Contents Search Next Back Home Contents Contents Corporate Statement 1 Corporate Governance 33 Financial Highlights 2 Report of the Remuneration Committee 35 Search Valuation 4 Directors’ Report 38 Chairman’s Statement 6 Directors and Advisers 40 Operating and Financial Review Senior Management 41 Next Chief Executive‘s Review 8 Directors’ Responsibilities 42 The Group’s Developments 10 Auditors’ Report 42 Offices 12 Valuers’ Report 43 Back Shops and Shopping Centres 16 Consolidated Profit and Loss Account 44 Retail Warehouses and Balance Sheets 45 Food Superstores 20 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 46 Hotels, Leisure and Residential 23 Other Primary Statements 47 Warehouses and Industrial 24 Notes to the Financial Statements 48 Financial Review 27 Ten Year Record 62 Environment and Health & Safety 32 Major Property Holdings 63 Investor Information (Inside Back Cover) FINANCIAL CALENDAR 1999 2000 26 May Preliminary Announcement January Interim dividend payable 7 June Ex-dividend date 11 June Registration qualifying date for final dividend 14 July Annual General Meeting 26 July Final dividend payable November Announcement of interim results (unaudited) LAND SECURITIES PLC Corporate Statement Home Contents We are committed to providing our shareholders Search with sustainable and growing returns underpinned by secure and increasing income, together with Next capital appreciation. Back We deliver these returns by developing and investing for the long term to create and enhance
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Project Pipeline
    3.0 Project Pipeline Following the workshop the project proposals were summarised into a pipeline. This was shared with all attendees for comments and further input and then reviewed by the North East LNP Natural Environment Group and other LNP representatives. The following summary provides an overview of project potential and likelihood of development. It is clear from this that there are potential landscape projects in the pipeline until 2019. Beyond this there is significant potential for further delivery, however the majority of these projects are currently at an outline stage and would require significant work to move towards delivery. This pipeline will be reviewed annually by the 3 North East LNPs to ensure that it remains a current overview of landscape delivery potential and allow partners to focus and align resources to ensure that there is the best approach taken to achieve delivery. It is anticipated that during this process, some projects will be discounted from the pipeline as delivery is unachievable whilst new ideas may be added as new opportunities are presented. Title Living Wild at Kielder Forest Source Existing project Lead Organisation Kielder Water and Forest Park Development Trust Estimated Size Geography Kielder Forest Project description Help people experience and learn about the area’s special animals and plants through the development of ‘nature hubs’ and a year-round events and activity programme. Partners Kielder Water and Forest Park Development Trust, Northumbrian Water, Forestry Commission , Northumberland Wildlife Trust, Environment Agency, Northumberland National Park Authority and Newcastle University. Timescale 2016- Estimated project £350,000 cost Funding sources HLF Identified need Outcomes Wildlife trails will be created from Stonehaugh, Falstone and Greenhaugh villages with support from the local community, while wildlife ambassadors and volunteers will inspire and engage with visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunderland Civic Centre in March 1965
    THE ARUP JOURNAL MARCH 1970 a? 4 m it - 6' Vol. 5 No 1 March 1970 Contents Published by Ove Amp & Partners Consulting Engineers Arup Associates Architects and Engineers THEARUP 1 3 Fitzroy Street. London. W1 P 6BQ Editor: Peter Hoggett Art Editor: Desmond Wyeth MSIA JOURNAL Editorial Assistant: David Brown Bridges on the Gateshead Western Bypass. by K. Ranawake D. Calkin I. McCulloch and C. Slack Sunderland 16 Civic Centre, by S. Price Carbon fibres: 24 Fig. 12 potential Plan at —5 m showing the area occupied by applications the basement in structures, by T. O'Brien Fig. 13 Basement The geometry 29 of Shahyad Ariamehr. by P. Ayres Front cover: Gateshead Western Bypass: Lobley Hill South Overbridge (Drawing by courtesy of Renton Howard Wood Associates) a Elevation of the basement wall Back cover: Shahyad Ariamehr: main lines, points and proportions from an original by Hossein Amanat determined as far as possible by the most suited the topography so well. Each bridge Bridges on the efficient road layout. deck is anchored at one point to one abut• 2 Economy. ment and free to move in one direction only at the other abutment (Fig. 6). Three types Gateshead Western 3 Minimum visual obstruction from abut• of mechanical bearings are used at the abut• ments and piers. Bypass ments ; fixed point, guided uni-directional and 4 Consistency of form and detail. free multi-directional. All bearings permit The first condition resulted in a large range of rotations in three directions. At the columns Keith Ranawake deck layouts. Horizontal alignments range the deck is supported on pairs of laminated from straight to those with considerable rubber bearings to the same specification.
    [Show full text]
  • A1 Birtley to Coal House Scheme Number: TR010031 EXA/D3/003 Applicant's Comments on Responses to EXA's Written Questions
    A1 Birtley to Coal House Scheme Number: TR010031 EXA/D3/003 Applicant’s Comments on Responses to EXA’s Written Questions Planning Act 2008 Rule 8(1)(c)(i) The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure Rules) 2010 March 2020 A1 Birtley to Coal House Applicant’s Comments on Responses to EXA’s Written Questions Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure Rules) 2010 The A1 Birtley to Coal House Development Consent Order 20[xx] Applicant’s Comments on Responses to EXA’s Written Questions Rule Number: Rule 8(1)(c)(i) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010031 Reference Application Document Reference EXA/D3/003 Author: A1 Birtley to Coal House Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 0 10 March 2020 Final Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010031 A1 Birtley to Coal House Applicant’s Comments on Responses to EXA’s Written Questions Table 1.1 – Response from Northern Gas Networks (NGN) WQ Question Question: Response from Northern Gas Networks (NGN) Applicant’s comments on the Response Ref to: 1.3.12 Northern NGN has made a representation [RR-004] The Applicant refers to Appendix 1.3 H of the ExA’s First Gas regarding the temporary acquisition of its land. At Written Questions [REP2-018], submitted at Deadline 2, Networks present it does not fully support the application. which addresses this question from the ExA. NGN states that further details of its concerns will be set out in its Written Representation including proposed protective provisions. a) The Applicant is asked to explain why CA and/or TP is required and whether or not its needs could be met by any alternative provisions, a lease or other legal agreement relating to NGN Land? b) NGN is requested to provide further details of NGN has invested significant time into the Generally, the Applicant has no reason to assume that these its proposed Compressed Natural Gas refuelling development of the CNG refuelling station.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayflower House Team Valley Trading Estate Fifth Avenue, Gateshead, Ne11 0Sd
    MAYFLOWER HOUSE TEAM VALLEY TRADING ESTATE FIFTH AVENUE, GATESHEAD, NE11 0SD STRATEGICALLY LOCATED AND REFURBISHED MULTI LET OFFICE INVESTMENT INVESTMENT SUMMARY + Situated in one of Europe’s largest mixed use commercial location + Prominent position fronting one of the principal estate roads + Refurbished office accommodation totalling approx 27,978 sq ft + Total car parking of 112 spaces (1:249 sq ft) + Long leasehold interest with 99 years remaining at a fixed rent of £100 pa + Following refurbishment, the property has now been fully let in the last 10 months + Let to three tenants on five leases + AWULT to break of 4.7 years and 9.4 years to expiry + Strong covenant strengths of Worldpay Limited, Addison Motors Ltd and Datawright Computer Services Limited + Total passing rent of £257,050.50 pa + Low average passing rent of £9.30 psf + Quoting offers in excess of £2,626,000, which reflects a NIY of 9.25% and a low capital value of £94 psf NORTH TYNESIDE NEWCASTLE North Shields INTERNATIONAL Wallsend AIRPORT LOCATION South Shields NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE Gateshead is located in the North East of England. The town forms part of the Newcastle SOUTH Upon Tyne conurbation, located to the south of the River Tyne. The town is c. 95 miles TYNESIDE north of Leeds, 110 miles south east of Edinburgh and London is approximately 280 miles to the south. Gateshead has a resident population of circa 78,000 and c. 1,400,000 people live within A167 GATESHEAD Boldon 12 miles. By road, Gateshead benefits from excellent access to the A1 facilitating links with Southwick Leeds to the south and Edinburgh to the north.
    [Show full text]
  • 93 Gateshead
    Gateshead - Heworth - Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Team Valley - Gateshead Go North East 93 Effective from: 05/09/2021 Gateshead InterchangeGateshead CollegeGateshead StadiumHeworth InterchangeFelling Square Windy Nook Queen Elizabeth HospitalRetail World MarquisTeam Way Valley NorthGateshead End Interchange Approx. 3 7 17 21 23 26 37 42 50 journey times Monday to Friday Gateshead Interchange 0508 0538 0608 0626 0644 0705 0721 0741 0812 0832 0855 0915 0935 0955 15 35 55 Gateshead College 0511 0541 0611 0630 0648 0709 0725 0746 0817 0837 0859 0919 0939 0959 19 39 59 Gateshead Stadium 0514 0544 0614 0633 0651 0712 0729 0751 0822 0842 0902 0922 0942 1002 Then 22 42 02 Heworth Interchange arr 0522 0552 0623 0642 0700 0721 0738 0800 0831 0851 0911 0931 0951 1011 at 31 51 11 Heworth Interchange dep 0523 0553 0624 0644 0702 0723 0741 0803 0833 0853 0913 0933 0953 1013 these 33 53 13 Felling Square 0527 0557 0628 0648 0706 0727 0746 0808 0838 0858 0918 0938 0958 1018 mins. 38 58 18 until Windy Nook 0529 0559 0630 0650 0708 0729 0749 0811 0840 0900 0920 0940 1000 1020 past 40 00 20 Queen Elizabeth Hospital 0531 0601 0633 0653 0711 0732 0752 0814 0843 0903 0923 0943 1003 1023 the 43 03 23 Retail World Marquis Way 0541 0611 0643 0704 0724 0746 0806 0828 0855 0915 0935 0955 1015 1035 hour 55 15 35 Team Valley North End 0552 0616 0649 0710 0730 0752 0812 0834 0901 0921 0941 1001 1021 1041 01 21 41 Gateshead Interchange 0559 0623 0657 0718 0738 0805 0825 0845 0910 0930 0950 1010 1030 1050 10 30 50 Gateshead - Heworth - Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Team Valley - Gateshead Go North East 93 Effective from: 05/09/2021 Monday to Friday (continued) Gateshead Interchange 1415 1435 1455 1515 ...
    [Show full text]
  • At-Home COVID-19 Testing Kit (PCR)
    We are busy updating our site to make it an even better experience for you. Normal service will resume on Sunday evening. In the meantime if you wish to purchase an At-home COVID-19 testing kit, then follow the instructions detailed below. If you wish to purchase an At-home COVID-19 testing kit you will need to do so in store during the period above. Please see the list of stores that stock this test kit at the bottom of this document. MyHealthChecked At-home COVID-19 PCR test What is a MyHealthChecked At-Home COVID-19 PCR Swab Test? The MyHealthChecked At-home COVID-19 PCR test is an easy to use, nasal self-swab test to help identify if you have the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. This test can be used for both general testing and international travel, where a Fit to Fly certificate is required. You must check with your travel provider exactly what your requirements are before ordering, as requirements and timings can vary greatly from country to country. The test is also suitable for individuals prior to making decisions such as travel or meeting with friends or family, or someone who needs to prove a negative test result for group attendance. Who is this test suitable for? The MyHealthChecked At-home COVID-19 PCR test is suitable for all ages and can be used by both adults and children. Adults aged 18 and over: self-test (unless unable to do so). Children and teenagers aged 12 to 17: self-test with adult supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding
    Northeast England – A history of flash flooding Introduction The main outcome of this review is a description of the extent of flooding during the major flash floods that have occurred over the period from the mid seventeenth century mainly from intense rainfall (many major storms with high totals but prolonged rainfall or thaw of melting snow have been omitted). This is presented as a flood chronicle with a summary description of each event. Sources of Information Descriptive information is contained in newspaper reports, diaries and further back in time, from Quarter Sessions bridge accounts and ecclesiastical records. The initial source for this study has been from Land of Singing Waters –Rivers and Great floods of Northumbria by the author of this chronology. This is supplemented by material from a card index set up during the research for Land of Singing Waters but which was not used in the book. The information in this book has in turn been taken from a variety of sources including newspaper accounts. A further search through newspaper records has been carried out using the British Newspaper Archive. This is a searchable archive with respect to key words where all occurrences of these words can be viewed. The search can be restricted by newspaper, by county, by region or for the whole of the UK. The search can also be restricted by decade, year and month. The full newspaper archive for northeast England has been searched year by year for occurrences of the words ‘flood’ and ‘thunder’. It was considered that occurrences of these words would identify any floods which might result from heavy rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities for Over 50S in Gateshead (January 2020) MONDAY TUESDAY
    Activities for Over 50s in Gateshead (January 2020) MONDAY Activity Location Time Cost Contact Iyengar Yoga Aiki Martial Arts & Fitness 9:30 to 11 £6 Dave Curry 07779 342183 Club, Ryton Zumba GOLD The Mount Community 10 to 11 £4 Sam 07736 040308 Association, Eighton Banks Dancercise Deckham Village Hall 10 to 10:45 £3.80 Move to Improve (Emma) 07963 048179 Low Impact Exercise Barmoor Hub, Ryton 10 to 10:45 £3.80 LIFE Programme 07999 500951 Mental Health Support 341-343 High Street, 10 to 12 Ring for info AgeUK Gateshead 0191 477 3559 Group Gateshead Art Diamonds Drop-in Crawcrook Library 10 to 12 FREE Jen/Karolynne 0191 433 2864 Group Art Diamonds Creative Whickham Library 10 to 12 FREE Jen/Karolynne 0191 433 2864 Writing Group 13, 27 January Walking Group Gateshead Interchange From 10:30 Ring for info AgeUK Gateshead 0191 477 3559 Strength and Balance Deckham Village Hall 11 to 11:45 £3.80 Move to Improve (Emma) 07963 048179 Coffee Morning Boltons Bungalows, 11 to 1 Ring for info MHA 01207 563 825 Chopwell Low Impact Exercise St. Joseph’s Church Hall, 11:45 to 12:30 £3.80 LIFE Programme 07999 500951 Blaydon Men’s Group Garesfield Golf Club 12 to 2:30 Ring for info MHA 01207 563 825 (alternate Mondays) Strength and Balance FACT, Denise Robertson 12:10 to 12:55 £3.80 Move to Improve (Emma) 07963 048179 House, Swalwell and 12:55 to 1:30 Seniors’ Lunch (monthly) Barmoor Hub, Ryton From 1 FREE – Booking 0191 413 6485 27 January essential Friendship Group Blaydon Library 1 to 3 Ring for info AgeUK Gateshead 0191 477 3559 Chair-based Exercise St.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Corridors Network Review BURTON REID
    Wildlife Corridors Network Review Final Report (Consultation Draft) Client Gateshead Council South Tyneside Council Sunderland City Council | December 2020 | BR0465/LDP/A | BURTON REID ASSOCIATES Wildlife Corridors Network Review December 2020 Gateshead Council | South Tyneside Council | Sunderland City Council BR0465/LDP/A Report Burton Reid Associates, Suite 8 Buckfastleigh Business Centre, 33 Chapel St, produced by Buckfastleigh, Devon TQ11 0AB Document ref: BR0465/LDP/A Client: Gateshead Council South Tyneside Council Sunderland City Council Project: Wildlife Corridors Network Review Report Burton Reid Associates, Suite 8 Buckfastleigh Business Centre, 33 Chapel St, produced by Buckfastleigh, Devon TQ11 0AB Author(s) Chrissy Mason MSc EcIA MCIEEM; Laura Snell BSc (Hons) MCIEEM Verified by Jenni Reid BSc (Hons) CEnv MCIEEM Issue date 11 December 2020 Revision 20 November 2020 Partial Draft 27 November 2020 Final Rev B 07 December 2020 Final Rev C 11 December 2020 Final Report A BURTON REID ASSOCIATES 2 Wildlife Corridors Network Review December 2020 Gateshead Council | South Tyneside Council | Sunderland City Council BR0465/LDP/A ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Burton Reid Associates are grateful for the input and support throughout the project of Claire Dewson (Sunderland City Coun- cil), Clare Rawcliffe (South Tyneside Council), Peter Shield (Gateshead Council), Gary Baker (Sunderland City Council) Deborah Lamb (South Tyneside Council) Grant Rainey (Gateshead Council) Chris Carr (Gateshead Council) and Mike Oxford. The authors are also grateful for the permission of the case studies partners including: Stephanie Evans (Chichester District Council) Nicky Court (Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre) Maria Clarke (Dorset Local Nature Partnership) Maurice Maynard (Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service) Natalie Rutter (Newcastle City Council) Jackie Hunter (North Tyneside Council) and Dan Wrench (Shropshire Council).
    [Show full text]