Toxic and Terminal: How the Regulation of Coal-Fired Power Stations Fails

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toxic and Terminal: How the Regulation of Coal-Fired Power Stations Fails Toxic and terminal How the regulation of coal-fired power stations fails Australian communities Lead authors: Bronya Lipski, Nicola Rivers and James Whelan Contributors: Dr Brad Smith, Josh Meadows Many thanks to all those who have assisted us with this report, in particular the community members who shared their stories with us and the power station and air pollution experts who informed and advised us. About Environmental Justice Australia Environmental Justice Australia is a not-for-profit public interest legal practice. Funded by donations and independent of government and corporate funding, our legal team combines a passion for justice with technical expertise and a practical understanding of the legal system to protect the environment. We act as advisers and legal representatives to the environment movement, pursuing court cases to protect our shared environment. We work with community-based environment groups, regional and state environmental organisations, and larger environmental NGOs. We provide strategic and legal support to their campaigns to address climate change, protect nature and defend the rights of communities to a healthy environment. While we seek to give the community a powerful voice in court, we also recognise that court cases alone will not be enough. That’s why we campaign to improve our legal system. We defend existing, hard- won environmental protections from attack. We also pursue new and innovative solutions to fill the gaps and fix the failures in our legal system to clear a path for a more just and sustainable world. For further information on this report please contact: Nicola Rivers, Director of Advocacy and Research, Environmental Justice Australia Email: [email protected] Environmental Justice Australia Telephone: 03 8341 3100/1300 336 842 Facsimile: 03 8341 3111 Email: [email protected] Website: www.envirojustice.org.au Post: PO Box 12123, A’Beckett Street VIC 8006 Address: Level 3, the 60L Green Building, 60 Leicester Street, Carlton Community rights in relation to power station pollution are summarised in our factsheets Your rights and coal-fired power stations in Victoria1 and Your rights and Coal-fired power stations in NSW2. Produced & published by Environmental Justice Australia ABN 74 052 124 375 Publication date: 7 August 2017 Cover photo: Yallourn power station. Photo by Max Philips Environmental Justice Australia Contents 1 Executive summary and recommendations 2 7 Do power stations comply with the law? 37 7.1 Finding out about power station licence breaches 38 2 Introduction 6 7.2 Breaches of toxic pollution licence conditions 38 2.1 About this report 7 7.3 Are regulators doing their job? 39 3 Health impacts of coal-fired power stations 9 8 Decommissioning and rehabilitating 3.1 The impact on local and distant communities 10 power stations 42 3.2 Pollutants and their impacts on health 12 8.1 Poor management now and later? Land and water 3.3 The health benefits of reducing air pollution 12 contamination from ash ponds 43 4 Toxic emissions from Australian power stations 14 8.2 Bonds and financial assurances 46 8.2.1 Financial assurances in Victoria 48 4.1 Coarse particle pollution (PM10) 16 8.2.2 Financial assurances in Queensland 48 4.2 Fine particle pollution (PM2.5) 17 8.2.3 Financial assurances in NSW 48 4.3 Sulfur dioxide (SO2) 18 4.4 Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) 19 9 Conclusions 50 5 How are power stations regulated? 22 10 Power station profiles 53 5.1 National air pollution standards 23 Power station: Vales Point 54 5.2 State regulation of power stations 25 Power station: Eraring 56 5.2.1 Emission limits 25 Power station: Bayswater 58 5.2.2 Are the limits adequate? 25 Power station: Liddell 60 5.2.3 Problems with the lack of a national Power station: Mt Piper 62 approach 25 Power station: Gladstone 64 5.3 Is air pollution monitoring and reporting adequate? 27 Power station: Stanwell 66 5.3.1 Power station emissions monitoring 27 Power station: Loy Yang A 68 5.3.2 Public reporting of emissions data 27 Power station: Yallourn 70 5.3.3 National Pollutant Inventory Reporting 29 Power station: Loy Yang B 72 5.4 Health costs borne by the community not the polluter 32 12 Appendix 74 5.5 What does this all mean? 32 13 References 76 6 Controlling toxic emissions from coal-fired power stations 33 6.1 Pollution reduction technologies 34 6.2 Do new power stations reduce toxic emissions? 36 Community voices Dr Ben Ewald, Newcastle GP 13 Mike Campbell OAM, community leader, NSW central coast 21 Bev Smiles, Hunter Communities Network 26 Graeme Wilson, Latrobe Valley Resident 31 Charmian Eckersley, Eraring Resident 41 Gary Blaschke OAM, community disability advocate, NSW central coast 45 Irene Proebsting, Latrobe Valley resident 49 1 Environmental Justice Australia 1 Executive summary and recommendations 2 Environmental Justice Australia Australia has one of the oldest and least efficient fleets stating that it was emitting at levels that correspond of coal-fired power stations in the world.3 Australia’s with its licence limits. Reports to the National power stations release more than a million tonnes of Pollutant Inventory for some NSW power stations toxic pollution into the air each year, affecting not just appear to be wildly in error. communities that live near the power stations, but also those further away, such as Sydney. Toxic pollution can • No power station in Victoria, NSW or Queensland has travel great distances, so the pollution from Australia’s been prosecuted for any offence in the past ten years. power stations is breathed in by millions of Australians. • None of the ten power stations has rehabilitation However, the health impacts of this toxic pollution are bonds or financial assurances imposed on it to ensure unfairly imposed most heavily on communities closest decommissioning and rehabilitation will occur if the to power stations. operator does not adequately rehabilitate after closure. This report focuses primarily on the four pollutants We have found that state government regulators in that have been monitored most extensively and have each state have allowed power station operators to well-established regulations and standards: coarse continue to emit unacceptable levels of pollution. How particles (PM ), fine particles (PM ), sulfur dioxide 10 2.5 does this happen? Their emission limits have been (SO ) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). These pollutants are 2 lax when compared to international standards; the extremely harmful to health, causing and worsening a monitoring and reporting they require from power range of medical conditions such as asthma, respiratory stations is inadequate; they have not required power problems, stroke, angina, heart attack and cancer.4 They stations to implement pollution reduction technologies irritate and inflame the lungs, leading to chronic lung that many power stations overseas have installed; disease and restricted lung growth in children.5 Children and they do not strictly enforce the law. As a result, and elderly people are particularly affected. communities are exposed to excessive and preventable For this report we reviewed the emissions data, licences, levels of toxic pollution. community complaints, compliance records and Building new coal-fired power stations is not the rehabilitation plans of ten of Australia’s most toxic coal- answer. New coal-fired power stations, even those fired power stations in NSW, Victoria and Queensland. described as ‘ultra-super critical’ or ‘HELE’ (high The following are just some of our many significant efficiency, low emission) only marginally reduce toxic discoveries. emissions. Constructing new coal-fired power stations to replace Australia’s old, inefficient fleet would still • Coal-fired power stations emit more than 30 toxic result in millions of tonnes of toxic pollution being substances that have serious impacts on the communities released into our air, water and land. that live near them including heart attack, stroke, asthma, lung cancer, respiratory and cardiovascular disease, Australia’s state and national governments are ill- irritation of the eyes, nose and throat, choking and prepared for power station closure, decommissioning coughing, headache, general discomfort and anxiety, and rehabilitation. This is illustrated by the absence of wheezing, colds, flu and bronchitis, coughing, rehabilitation bonds or financial assurances imposed on shortness of breath, tiredness and nausea. any of the power stations we reviewed. Failing to plan for closure maximises the social and economic harm in • Coal-fired power stations are the biggest source of the very communities that have lived for decades with PM2.5, SO2 and oxides of nitrogen in Australia. the pollution from these power stations. • In almost all cases the emissions limits applied to Figure 1 represents some of the key findings of our Australian power stations are significantly less research. stringent than the standards in the European Union, United States and China. For example the Victorian So what should be done? Strong regulation is critical to and Queensland power stations’ particle limits are less reduce the toxic burden power station pollution gives strict than all three international limits. Loy Yang A’s to people who live nearby. Communities, especially particle limit is eight times China’s limit. The mercury communities living in the shadow of power stations, limits for some NSW power stations are 666 times have little control over the air they breathe. They higher than the US limits. This is unacceptable.
Recommended publications
  • NSW Infrastructure Capability Assessment: Energy Baseline Report
    NSW Infrastructure Capability Assessment Energy Baseline Report April 2012 This document is intended solely for the use and information of Infrastructure NSW Report Outline • Key Highlights • Introduction • Energy Industry Overview and Current Situation • Electricity • Gas 22 Key Highlights – Electricity • The majority of electricity generation and all transmission and distribution infrastructure assets in NSW are government owned • The NSW government recently privatised the retail electricity sector and announced plans to sell electricity generation assets • 82% (or 16,600MW) of electricity in NSW is generated by 4 key state owned corporations . Electricity is transmitted over a 12,000km transmission system and distributed over ~250,000km distribution system. The book value of this infrastructure is $34bn and the annual capital expenditure is around $4.5bn • Electricity infrastructure is planned through a number of national and operator network plans including the Electricity Statement of Opportunities, the National Transmission Network Development Plan, TransGrid's Annual Transmission Network Development Plan, the distributors Annual Network Development Plans and Performance Reports, and the 5-year Regulatory Proposals and Determinations by the Australian Energy Regulator • These reports provide evidence that, while a number of the state owned electricity distribution assets are beyond or approaching their standard design lives, electricity infrastructure appears to be in good condition and is capable of meeting demand • The performance of electricity generation, transmission and distribution infrastructure is monitored via a number of indicators. The NSW Government sets reliability and security standards through its Network licences. Key electricity operating licence performance indicators such as the average duration and frequency of interruptions have been improving over time • Electricity demand has been flat for the past 5 years partly due to slower economic growth, efficiency and in response to large price increases.
    [Show full text]
  • F O R Im M E D Ia T E R E L E A
    Article No. 8115 Available on www.roymorgan.com Link to Roy Morgan Profiles Friday, 30 August 2019 Powershop still number one in electricity satisfaction, despite losing spark in recent months Powershop has won the Roy Morgan Electricity Provider of the Month Award with a customer satisfaction rating of 78% for July 2019. Powershop has now won the past seven monthly awards, remaining unbeaten in 2019. Powershop’s customer satisfaction rating of 78% was followed by Lumo Energy (71%), Simply Energy (70%), Click Energy (70%), Red Energy (70%) and Alinta Energy (70%). E These are the latest findings from the Roy Morgan Single Source survey derived from in-depth face-to- face interviews with 1,000 Australians each week and over 50,000 each year. Powershop managed to maintain its number one position in customer satisfaction, despite it recording the largest decline in ratings of any leading provider, falling from 87% in January 2019, to 78% (-9%) as of July 2019. Over the same period, Lumo Energy, Simply Energy and Click Energy all fell by 4%, Red Energy remained steady, and Alinta Energy increased its rating by 1%. Although Powershop remains well clear of its competitors, if its consistent downtrend in ratings continues for the next few months, we may well see another electricity provider take the lead in customer satisfaction. The Roy Morgan Customer Satisfaction Awards highlight the winners but this is only the tip of the iceberg. Roy Morgan tracks customer satisfaction, engagement, loyalty, advocacy and NPS across a wide range of industries and brands. This data can be analysed by month for your brand and importantly your competitive set.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Energy Week?
    ALL THE BIG ISSUES. ALL THE KEY PLAYERS. ALL UNDER ONE ROOF. 8 - 11 MAY 2018 | MELBOURNE CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRE | AUSTRALIA 500+ 6x 80+ + 9x 5 ATTENDEES CONFERENCE INDUSTRY ENGAGING TECHNICAL NETWORKING STREAMS SPEAKERS EXHIBITION ROUNDTABLES With key experts from across industry including: The Hon. Josh Frydenberg MP Audrey Zibelman Paul Broad Richard Gross Elisabeth Brinton Minister for Environment and Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Executive General Manager Energy Australian Energy Market Snowy Hydro Ausgrid New Energy Australian Government Operator AGL Energy Kerry Schott Timothy Rourke John Pierce Merryn York Paul Italiano Independent Chair Chief Executive Officer Chairman Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Energy Security Board CitiPower & Powercor Australian Energy Market Powerlink TransGrid Commission REGISTER TODAY! Book before 9 February and save up to $700! +61 (0)2 9977 0565 www.energyweek.com.au Supported by: Organised by: WHAT IS AUSTRALIAN ENERGY WEEK? Australian Energy Week is the annual meeting place for stakeholders of all levels from the entire energy supply chain. From CEOs to new graduates, energy traders to engineers. And everyone in between. So no matter what your role in the sector - Australian Energy Week has something for you. Each year it brings together over 500 representatives from over 200 organisations. It’s an unparalleled opportunity to engage with the leaders of the energy industry, network with your peers and get invaluable market, technology
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Electricity and Gas Retail Markets in Victoria
    Submission to the Review of electricity and gas retail markets in Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) Brotherhood of St Laurence March 2017 About the Brotherhood of St Laurence The Brotherhood of St Laurence (BSL) is an independent non-government organisation with strong community links that has been working to reduce poverty in Australia since the 1930s. Based in Melbourne, but with a national profile, the BSL continues to fight for an Australia free of poverty. We undertake research, service development and delivery, and advocacy with the objective of addressing unmet needs and translating the understandings gained into new policies, new programs and practices for implementation by government and others. Brotherhood of St Laurence 67 Brunswick Street Fitzroy Vic. 3065 ABN 24 603 467 024 Ph. (03) 9483 1183 www.bsl.org.au For further information or to discuss this submission, please contact: Damian Sullivan Research and Policy, Senior Manager, Energy, Equity and Climate Change Brotherhood of St Laurence Email: [email protected] Ph. (03) 9483 1176 Mob. 0414 960 274 Introduction The Brotherhood of St Laurence commends the Victorian Government for undertaking the Review of electricity and gas retail markets in Victoria and we welcome the opportunity to provide a submission. Central to our approach is – energy is an essential service. Without the services energy enables – heating, cooling, lighting, entertainment – households’ health, wellbeing, social and economic participation are all put at risk. Such concerns are not merely academic. We know the numbers of disconnections have increased – forcing some households to go without energy, at the same time we know other households trade off paying their energy bills with other needs such as buying food or participation in school excursions (see for example Chesters 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Annual Report
    STRATEGY PERFORMANCE GROWTH From resources… ANNUAL REPORT 2007 Contents Financial calendar 2007/08 P.2 2007 Highlights P.30 Executive Management Team 3/9/07 Ex-dividend trading commences P. 4 Chairman’s Message P.31 Corporate Governance 10/9/07 Record date for fi nal dividend P.6 Managing Director’s Review P.39 Directors’ Report 3/10/07 Final dividend paid P.10 Case Study – Strategy in Action P. 44 Remuneration Report 31/10/07 Annual general meeting P.12 Operations Review P.61 Financial Statements 31/12/07 Half-year end – Exploration and Production P.80 Share and Shareholder Information 28/2/08 Half-year profi t announcement P.16 – Generation P.82 Exploration and Production Permits and Data 30/6/08 Financial year end P.18 – Retail P.84 Financial History P.22 – Contact Energy IBC Glossary of Terms Origin Energy Limited P.24 – Sustainability ABN 30 000 051 696 P.26 – Corporate P.28 Board of Directors …to customers It has been a year of signifi cant change for Origin Energy. We have consolidated our strategic focus on the competitive segments of the energy supply chain, and deepened the integration of our business, from resources to customers. Our performance, outlined in this report, demonstrates our ability to deliver earnings growth and predictable cash fl ows in a volatile energy market. 1 FROM RESOURCES TO CUSTOMERS 2007 HIGHLIGHTS • 5 July 2006 – Commenced sales from the BassGas Project. • 30 August 2006 – Prime Minister announces Origin Energy-led consortium to deliver Adelaide Solar City Project. • 29 September 2006 – Negotiated early termination of Mount Stuart Power Purchase Agreement, providing full operational fl exibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Eraring Battery Energy Storage System Scoping Report
    Eraring Battery Energy Storage System Scoping Report IS365800_Scoping Report | Final 25 March 2021 Origin Energy Eraring Pty Limited Scoping Report Origin Energy Eraring Pty Limited Scoping Report Eraring Battery Energy Storage System Project No: IS365800 Document Title: Scoping Report Document No.: IS365800_Scoping Report Revision: Final Document Status: For Lodgement Date: 25 March 2021 Client Name: Origin Energy Eraring Pty Limited Project Manager: Thomas Muddle Author: Ada Zeng, Carys Scholefield & Thomas Muddle File Name: IS365800_Origin_ Eraring BESS_Scoping Report_Final Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 4, 12 Stewart Avenue Newcastle West, NSW 2302 PO Box 2147 Dangar, NSW 2309 Australia T +61 2 4979 2600 F +61 2 4979 2666 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved 05 25/3/2021 Final A Zeng C Scholefield T Muddle T Muddle
    [Show full text]
  • Imagine Lake Mac
    IMAGINE LAKE MAC OUR PLAN TO 2050 AND BEYONDIMAGINE LAKE MAC 2050 AND BEYOND 1 CITY VISION Bringing our City Vision WE BALANCE to life, Imagine Lake Mac OUR CHERISHED helps us to look ahead ENVIRONMENTS with purpose WITH OUR NEED FOR GREAT SPACES TO Its goal is to fulfil the LIVE AND VISIT, SMART City’s potential TRANSPORT OPTIONS …To be one of the most AND A THRIVING productive, adaptable, ECONOMY; WHICH sustainable and highly ADAPT AND STRIVE TO liveable places in Australia BE FAIR FOR ALL. Acknowledgement Lake Macquarie City Council acknowledges the Awabakal People, the traditional custodians of the land over which this document was prepared. We pay respect to knowledge holders and community members of the land and acknowledge and pay respect to Elders, past, present and future. We would also like to acknowledge staff, Councillors and community members involved in preparing this strategy. 2 IMAGINE LAKE MAC 2050 AND BEYOND IMAGINE LAKE MAC 2050 AND BEYOND 3 Message from the Mayor Message from the CEO I am pleased to present Imagine Lake Lake Macquarie City is a vibrant place to Mac, a long-term strategy that will guide work, live and invest. the evolution of the City. Its natural landscape, particularly the Imagining Lake Macquarie in 2050, I lake and coastline, shape our lifestyle see a dynamic and productive city and and love of the outdoors. The nine a place that enables its community to major centres strategically spread thrive. across the City are focal points for It is a progressive city, well known for its employment, recreation, retail and innovation, investment opportunities, services.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Reliable Electricity Supply in Victoria to 2028: Suggested Policy Changes
    Ensuring reliable electricity supply in Victoria to 2028: suggested policy changes Associate Professor Bruce Mountain and Dr Steven Percy November 2019 All material in this document, except as identified below, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non- Commercial 4.0 International Licence. Material not licensed under the Creative Commons licence: • Victoria Energy Policy Centre logo • Victoria University logo • All photographs, graphics and figures. All content not licenced under the Creative Commons licence is all rights reserved. Permission must be sought from the copyright owner to use this material. Disclaimer: The Victoria Energy Policy Centre and Victoria University advise that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No eliancer or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, the Victoria Energy Policy Centre and Victoria University (including its employees and consultants) exclude all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Publisher: Victoria Energy Policy Centre, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. ISBN: 978-1-86272-810-3 November 2019 Citation: Mountain, B. R., and Percy, S. (2019). Ensuring reliable electricity supply in Victoria to 2028: suggested policy changes. Victoria Energy Policy Centre, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Tech Handbook for Asia Pacific May 2010
    Clean Tech Handbook for Asia Pacific May 2010 Asia Pacific Clean Tech Handbook 26-Apr-10 Table of Contents FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................. 16 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 19 1.1 WHAT IS CLEAN TECHNOLOGY? ........................................................................................................................ 19 1.2 WHY CLEAN TECHNOLOGY IN ASIA PACIFIC? .......................................................................................................19 1.3 FACTORS DRIVING THE CLEAN TECH MARKET IN ASIA PACIFIC .................................................................................20 1.4 KEY CHALLENGES FOR THE CLEAN TECH MARKET IN ASIA PACIFIC ............................................................................20 1.5 WHO WOULD BE INTERESTED IN THIS REPORT? ....................................................................................................21 1.6 STRUCTURE OF THE HANDBOOK ........................................................................................................................ 21 PART A – COUNTRY REVIEW.......................................................................................................................... 22 2 COUNTRY OVERVIEW..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NRG Energy Successful in Bid for Flinders Power in South Australia
    NRG Energy Successful in Bid for Flinders Power in South Australia August 2, 2000 MINNEAPOLIS, Aug 02, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE)---NRG Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NRG) announced today it has been named the successful bidder in the South Australian Government's electricity privatization auction for Flinders Power, South Australia's final generation company to be privatized. NRG agreed to pay (Aus.) $313 million ($180 million U.S.) cash for a 100-year lease of the Flinders Power assets. Flinders Power includes two power stations totaling 760 megawatts (MW), the Leigh Creek coal mine 175 miles north of the power stations, a dedicated rail line between the two, and Leigh Creek township. The lease agreement also includes managing the long-term fuel supply and power purchase agreement for the 180-MW Osborne Cogeneration Station. NRG expects to close the transaction in early September. "Flinders gives NRG a strong position in the vibrant South Australian power market," said Keith G. Hilless, NRG Asia-Pacific managing director and CEO. The power stations are the 240-MW Playford Power Station and the 520-MW Northern Power Station, both located in Port Augusta on the Spencer Gulf--approximately 190 miles north of South Australia's capital city, Adelaide. The Playford and Northern power stations use pulverized coal-fired steam turbine generation technology. Northern is a baseload facility and is the lowest-cost generator in South Australia, while Playford is a peaking facility. "Flinders Power confirms our long-term commitment to the Australian power generation market," commented David H. Peterson, chairman, president and CEO of NRG. "This project is right in line with NRG's strategy of acquiring assets that complement our core portfolio and represent a variety of dispatch levels." Flinders Power, which NRG will operate, is the only generator in South Australia to own its own fuel source.
    [Show full text]
  • Haughton V Minister for Planning and Macquarie Generation; Haughton V
    Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Haughton v Minister for Planning and Citation: Macquarie Generation; Haughton v Minister for Planning and TRUenergy Pty Ltd [2011] NSWLEC 217 Hearing dates: 15 - 17 September 2010 Decision date: 02 December 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Craig J Decision: 1. The applicant's summons is dismissed. 2. Costs are reserved. 3. Exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW: whether applicant has standing to bring proceedings - s 75T of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - review sought for jurisdictional error - section not read down to exclude standing under s 123 of the EPA Act when review sought on that ground - ouster clause not operative JUDICIAL REVIEW: whether critical infrastructure declaration in relation to two Major Projects validly made under s 75C of the EPA Act - projects for the purpose of energy supply - statutory interpretation of relevant and interrelated sections of the legislation - category of development the subject of declaration - declaration validly made JUDICIAL REVIEW: concept plan approvals under Part 3A of the EPA Act - matters for consideration - whether Ecologically Sustainable Development is a mandatory relevant consideration - greenhouse gas emissions - climate change - whether Minister failed to consider ESD principles - extended review of materials for concept plan approval - balancing of impacts - the public interest - need to secure electricity generation - no error in weighing competing considerations - decision was not manifestly
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report: Retirement of Coal Fired Power
    Chapter 4 Options for managing the transition away from coal fired power stations 4.1 Stakeholders to the inquiry commented at length on how a phased closure of coal generators could be best managed. In particular, the need for the development of a national transition plan was highlighted, integrating energy and climate policy as well as coordinating the response to assist affected workers and communities. Need for a national transition plan 4.2 Support for a consistent, long-term national transition plan was widespread among submitters to the inquiry. Engineers Australia argued: …the Australian government needs to create a transition plan which outlines policy mechanisms to encourage the retirement of Australia's highest emitting power stations, while also providing options for affected workers and communities…Without a clear plan, Australia risks the potential to lose a large portion of its generating capacity in a short period without any alternatives in place, while at the same time undermining its 1 Paris COP21 commitments. 4.3 Engineers Australia submitted that this transition plan should outline: • how Australia will achieve its emission reduction targets through the electricity generation sector, outlining a transition from fossil fuel power plants to renewable and low carbon emission options; • a timeline for when Australia will begin the transition away from major capacity fossil-fuelled power stations, and what generation options will be used to replace them; • the obligation costs that the major fossil fuel power stations
    [Show full text]