DOCSLIB.ORG

FUTURE of HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH Advancing Health Systems Research and Practice in the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FUTURE of HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH Advancing Health Systems Research and Practice in the United States A NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SPECIAL PUBLICATION THE FUTURE OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH Advancing Health Systems Research and Practice in the United States Danielle Whicher, Kristin Rosengren, Sameer Siddiqi, Lisa Simpson, Editors WASHINGTON, DC NAM.EDU NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE • 500 FIFTH STREET, NW • WASHINGTON, DC 20001 NOTICE: This publication has undergone peer review according to procedures established by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). Publication by the NAM signifies that it is the product of a carefully considered process and is a contribution worthy of public attention, but it does not constitute endorsement of conclusions and recommendations by the NAM. The views presented in this publication are those of individual contributors and do not represent formal consensus positions of the authors’ organizations; the NAM; or the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Support for this publication was provided by AcademyHealth, American Association of Colleges of Nursing, American Board of Family Medicine, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Association of American Medical Colleges, and the Federation of American Hospitals. Support for this publication was also provided in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Building the Evidence Base for Improving Health Care: Contributions, Opportunities, and Priorities (Workshop) (2018 : Washington, D.C.), author. | Whicher, Danielle, editor. | Rosengren, Kristin, editor. | Siddiqi, Sameer, editor. | Simpson, Lisa (Of AcademyHealth), editor. Title: The future of health services research : advancing health systems research and prac- tice in the United States / Danielle Whicher, Kristin Rosengren, Sameer Siddiqi, Lisa Simpson, editors. Description: Washington, DC : National Academy of Medicine, [2018] | At head of title: A National Academy of Medicine special publication. | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2018048491 (print) | LCCN 2018049191 (ebook) | ISBN 9781947103153 (E-book) | ISBN 9781947103146 (pbk. : alk. paper) Subjects: | MESH: Health Services Research--methods | Health Services Research--trends | Research Design | Health Policy | United States | Congresses Classification: LCC RA440.85 (ebook) | LCC RA440.85 (print) | NLM W 84.3 | DDC 362.1072--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018048491 Copyright 2018 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Suggested citation: Whicher, D., Rosengren, K., Siddiqi, S., Simpson, L., editors. 2018. The Future of Health Services Research: Advancing Health Systems Research and Practice in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine. “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.” —GOETHE LEADERSHIP INNOVATION I M PAC T for a healthier future ABOUT THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICINE The National Academy of Medicine is one of three Academies constituting the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies). The National Academies provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine. The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institu- tion to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineer- ing to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on issues of health, health care, and biomedical science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. Learn more about the National Academy of Medicine at NAM.edu. v PLANNING COMMITTEE ON BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR IMPROVING HEALTH CARE ANDREW BINDMAN, University of California San Francisco CAROLYN CLANCY, US Department of Veterans Affairs ELLIE DEHONEY, Research!America ADAEZE ENEKWECHI, McDermott+Consulting LEE FLEISHER, University of Pennsylvania SHERRY GLIED, New York University ATUL GROVER, Association of American Medical Colleges SANDRA R. HERNÁNDEZ, California Health Care Foundation CHARLES N. KAHN III, Federation of American Hospitals GOPAL KHANNA, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SUZANNE MIYAMOTO, American Association of Colleges of Nursing ROBERT PHILLIPS, American Board of Family Medicine ALONZO PLOUGH, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation JOE V. SELBY, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute LISA SIMPSON, AcademyHealth NAM Staff Development of this publication was facilitated by contributions of the follow- ing NAM staff, under the guidance of J. Michael McGinnis, NAM Leonard D. Schaeffer Executive Officer and Executive Director of the Leadership Consortium for a Value & Science-Driven Health System: DANIELLE WHICHER, Senior Program Officer MICHELLE JOHNSTON-FLEECE, Senior Program Officer (until September 2018) HENRIETTA OSEI-ANTO, Senior Program Officer SAMEER SIDDIQI, Technical Consultant GWENDOLYN HUGHES, Senior Program Assistant (until July 2018) JENNA OGILVIE, Communications Officer vii viii | The Future of Health Services Research AcademyHealth Staff LISA SIMPSON, President and CEO KRISTIN ROSENGREN, Vice President, Strategic Communications Consultant STEVE OLSON, Science Writer and Rapporteur REVIEWERS This publication was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with review proce- dures established by the NAM. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this publication: ALEXANDER OMMAYA, Association of American Medical Colleges ELEANOR M. PERFETTO, National Health Council MEREDITH ROSENTHAL, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the publication, nor did they see the final draft before it was published. Review of this publi- cation was overseen by Danielle Whicher, Senior Program Officer, NAM and J. Michael McGinnis, Leonard D. Schaeffer Executive Officer, NAM. Responsibility for the final content of this publication rests entirely with the editors and the NAM. ix FOREWORD t is evident in multiple dimensions that health and health care in the United IStates is in a period of unprecedented opportunity, accompanied by very imposing challenges. The promises are clear. The biomedical and social sciences are providing new fundamental insights on sources and courses of disease and infirmity, along with new strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Mapping the human genome has opened the door to better targeting of indi- vidual and public health interventions. Engineering technologies applicable from the nano- to macro- scale hold prospects for restructuring health and safety as integral products of our physical and biologic environments. Diagnostic and therapeutic interventions previously developed for delivery in sophisticated medical centers now have variations in development for delivery and use in remote settings. Data gathered with greater convenience to patients and families and delivered securely to a skilled site for interpretation and application offer prospects for both accelerated access to effectively tailored interventions and for continuous learning and improvement facilitated by artificial intelligence and machine learning. Advances of these sorts have yielded real gains for Americans: saving lives, extending life spans, and introducing progress against many chronic conditions, infectious diseases, and injuries. Similarly, meaningful contributions have been made to cost sharing, quality improvement, payment models, and patient safety. Yet significant unmet challenges remain, and some of them are worsening. Health care costs in the United States still rank highest in the world, well above the next most expensive delivery system, now approaching 18% of the US Gross Domestic Product. Despite the magnitude of national spend- ing, unacceptable disparities still exist in the health experiences of different population groups, and, for certain groups, those disparities are increasing to the point that life spans are actually decreasing. These persistent disparities are in part the product of lifelong inequities experienced by some groups, and in part the product of a longstanding divide between the delivery of health services and the access to social services—such as food, housing, and transportation—needed particularly in the context of the health risks in play. xi xii | The Future of Health Services Research Our payment systems remain substantially focused on rewarding service
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Health Services Research: What Is
    Health Service Research: What is it? Michael Weiner, M.D., M.P.H. Associate Professor of Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics Indiana University Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication Regenstrief Institute, Inc. Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.A. mailto:[email protected] Presentation for ASHFoundation Implementation Science Summit 20 March 2014 Disclosure • Michael Weiner • Associate Professor of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis • Speaker Disclosures • No relevant financial relationships • No relevant non-financial relationships • The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Goals for Today • Define health services research (HSR) • Learn about key concepts and methods used in HSR • Consider HSR’s relevance to implementation science Definition What is a health service? • “All services dealing with the diagnosis and treatment of disease, or the promotion, maintenance, and restoration of health.” • Includes personal and non-personal health services. • “Service provision refers to the way inputs such as money, staff, equipment, and drugs are combined to allow the delivery of health interventions.” • Factors needed to improve access, coverage, and quality of services • Availability of services • Organization and management of services • Incentives influencing providers and users http://www.who.int/topics/health_services/en/ Definition of health services research • Organizational structures and • Access to care processes • Quality • Health technologies •Costs • Social factors • Health • Financing systems • Personal behaviors • Domains: individuals, families, organizations, institutions, communities, and populations Lohr KN, Steinwachs DM. Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):7-9.
    [Show full text]
  • Value-Driven Health Care Purchasing: Four States That Are Ahead of the Curve
    VALUE-DRIVEN HEALTH CARE PURCHASING: FOUR STATES THAT ARE AHEAD OF THE CURVE OVERVIEW Sharon Silow-Carroll and Tanya Alteras Health Management Associates August 2007 ABSTRACT: Health care purchasers, suppliers, and consumers are rallying for better-quality health care. In response, several states are pursuing value-based purchasing (VBP) initiatives that emphasize collection of quality-of-care data, transparency of quality and cost information, and incentives. In this overview of public–private VBP efforts in Massachusetts, Minnesota, Washington, and Wisconsin, the authors find that tiered premiums, pay-for-performance measures, and the designation of high-performance providers as “centers of excellence” are paying off. Minnesota, for example, has used incentives to achieve about $20 million in savings in 2006. Similarly, Wisconsin’s Department of Employee Trust Funds has announced premium rate increases in the single digits for the third straight year. More research is necessary to determine the true impact of VBP, but health plans and providers are paying attention to and learning from these current efforts. (Note: Accompanying the overview report are four separate state case studies, available at http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=515778.) Support for this research was provided by The Commonwealth Fund. The views presented here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of The Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff. This report and other Fund publications are available online at www.commonwealthfund.org. To learn more about new publications when they become available, visit the Fund’s Web site and register to receive e-mail alerts. Commonwealth Fund pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Health Care
    . Quality Health Care • Centers of Excellence • Improving Quality Quality Health Care Quality • Pay for Performance • Literature Centers of Excellence The term “Center of Excellence” has been widely used and in many different ways. The basic concept behind health care centers of excellence is that a provider who specializes in a particular type of program or service can produce better outcomes. One example of a center of excellence program is the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) cancer center program that was created in 1971 to establish regional centers of excellence in cancer research and patient care. The NCI cancer center designation is an official designation. Providers must meet certain criteria and demonstrate excellence in research, cancer prevention and clinical services. NCI designation helps institutions compete for both research dollars and patients. The term “Center of Excellence” has also been used by many without official designation. Some providers of care simply proclaim themselves centers of excellence. This is especially true for specialty hospitals that have been proliferated in many parts of the country. While these facilities may specialize in a particular service, there may not be clinical evidence demonstrating that the care they provide is superior. Similarly, insurers may include "Centers of Excellence" in their networks, but the extent to which these facilities have met established performance benchmarks is not always clear. While some insurers go to great length to identify the highest quality providers for certain services, others may establish a "Center of Excellence" primarily to concentrate volume to achieve more favorable payment rates. Much of the literature on Centers of Excellence has focuses on the relationship between volume and outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice
    Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice Health Services Research Doctoral Program Handbook 2019-2020 Academic Year Health Services Research Doctoral Program Handbook Dear Students, Welcome to the Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice PhD program in Health Services Research at Brown University’s School of Public Health. This handbook provides information about the policies and procedures to guide the completion of your doctoral degree. Information about University Doctoral and Graduate student policies can be found in the Graduate School Handbook. Inside this handbook, you will find information about degree requirements, financial support and mentoring. We hope that this is a useful resource to you during your time in the program. Yours Sincerely, Amal Trivedi, MD, MPH Graduate Program Director 2 Health Services Research Doctoral Program Handbook PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 4 ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................ 5 BASIC DEGREE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................. 5 OTHER REQUIREMENTS TO GRADUATE .................................................................................. 6 Journal Club and Faculty Forum ............................................................................................................................. 6 Seminars ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
    NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY & DISPARITIES REPORT 2018 2015 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report and National Quality Stategy 5th Anniversary Update c This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. Suggested citation: 2018 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2019. AHRQ Pub. No. 19-0070-EF. 2018 NATIONAL HEALTHCARE QUALITY AND DISPARITIES REPORT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov AHRQ Publication No. 19-0070-EF September 2019 www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/index.html ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report (QDR) is the product of collaboration among agencies from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), other federal departments, and the private sector. Many individuals guided and contributed to this effort. Without their magnanimous support, the report would not have been possible. Specifically, we thank: Primary AHRQ Staff: Gopal Khanna, Francis Chesley, Virginia Mackay-Smith, Jeff Brady, Erin Grace, Karen Chaves, Nancy Wilson, Darryl Gray, Barbara Barton, Doreen Bonnett, and Irim Azam. HHS Interagency Workgroup (IWG) for the QDR: Susan Jenkins (ACL), Irim Azam (AHRQ), Barbara Barton (AHRQ), Doreen Bonnett (AHRQ), Karen Chaves (AHRQ), Fran Chevarley (AHRQ), Camille Fabiyi (AHRQ), Darryl Gray (AHRQ), Kevin
    [Show full text]
  • Telehealth After COVID-19: Clarifying Policy Goals for a Way Forward
    January 2021 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE LORI USCHER-PINES, MONIQUE MARTINEAU Telehealth After COVID-19 Clarifying Policy Goals for a Way Forward n March 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic shut- tered communities and disrupted the health care delivery system. But clini- Icians quickly dusted off their webcams and leveraged telehealth to continue care—and keep their practices afloat—while still meeting social distancing guidelines. Temporary, dramatic policy waivers (see box) broadened access to and payment for telehealth on an unprecedented scale. These policy changes led to skyrocketing telehealth use in spring 2020. At the time, there was a lot of talk about how tele- health’s time had finally arrived, and how genies were not returning to their bottles. But that might be the wrong metaphor for telehealth use in 2020. The surge in tele- health use had ebbed somewhat by the summer months (Mehrotra et al., 2020), and it is too soon to tell whether the initial enthusiasm for virtual visits was borne of desperation (Uscher-Pines, 2020) or whether some of the newfound appreciation for telehealth can persist under the right policy conditions. C O R P O R A T I O N Federal Telehealth Restrictions Temporarily Changed During the Public Health Emergency and Responsible Agency or Legislation Medicare • Expand the types of providers that can furnish and are eligible to bill Medicare for telehealth services (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security [CARES] Act) • Allow providers eligible to bill
    [Show full text]
  • How the Government As a Payer Shapes the Health Care Marketplace by Tevi D
    2014 How the Government as a Payer Shapes the Health Care Marketplace By Tevi D. Troy 2014 2014 American Health Policy Institute (AHPI) is a non-partisan 501(c)(3) think tank, established to examine the impact of health policy on large employers, and to explore and propose policies that will help bolster the ability of large employers to provide quality, affordable health care to employees and their dependents. The Affordable Care Act has catalyzed a national debate about the future of health care in the United States, and the Institute serves to provide thought leadership grounded in the practical experience of America’s largest employers. To learn more, visit ghgvghgghghhg americanhealthpolicy.org. Contents Executive Summary................................................................................. 1 Shaping Business Models ......................................................................... 2 Insurance Premiums ............................................................................... 6 Availability of Innovative Products ....................................................... 7 Quality Measures ..................................................................................... 8 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 9 Endnotes ................................................................................................. 10 Executive Summary The federal government is the largest single payer of health care in the United States1, accounting for
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Impact of Accreditation on a Primary Healthcare Organization in Qatar Alia Ghareeb Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2015 Examining the Impact of Accreditation on a Primary Healthcare Organization in Qatar Alia Ghareeb Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Health and Medical Administration Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Health Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Alia Ghareeb has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Suzanne Richins, Committee Chairperson, Health Services Faculty Dr. Sandra Bever, Committee Member, Health Services Faculty Dr. James Rohrer, University Reviewer, Health Services Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2016 Abstract Examining the Impact of Accreditation on a Primary Healthcare Organization in Qatar by Alia Fouad Ghareeb MHCM, California State University of Los Angeles, 2006 BS, Lebanese University Faculty of Science, 2002 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Health Sciences Walden University February 2016 Abstract Although a modest body of literature exists on accreditation, little research was conducted on the impact of accreditation on primary healthcare organizations in the Middle East. This study assessed the changes resulting from the integration of Accreditation Canada International’s accreditation program in a primary healthcare organization in the State of Qatar.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs Supporting the Use of Comparative Effectiveness Research and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research by State Policymakers Iv
    Pr o g r a m s su pp o r t i n g th e us e of Co m P a r a t i v e ef f e C t i v e n e s s re s e a r C h an d Pa t i e n t - Ce n t e r e d ou t C o m e s re s e a r C h By st a t e Po l i C y m a k e r s Barbara Wirth and Felicia Heider u g u s t A 2014 h i s p r o j e c T w a s s u p p o r T e d T h r o u g h a a T i e n T e n T e r e d u T c o m e s e s e a r c h n s T i T u T e T u g e n e ap s h i n g T o-c n n g a g e mo e n T w a r d r i (pcori) e w e a II Pr o g r a m s su pp o r t i n g th e us e of Co m P a r a t i v e ef f e C t i v e n e s s re s e a r C h an d Pa t i e n t - Ce n t e r e d ou t C o m e s re s e a r C h By st a t e Po l i C y m a k e r s Copyright © 2014 National Academy for State Health Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • DHCS Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care
    DHCS Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care Jennifer Kent, Director Release Date: March 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Three Linked Goals and Seven Priorities ................................................................ 2 Sustaining a Culture of Quality .............................................................................. 3 Advancing Quality Improvement ............................................................................ 3 Table 1 ..................................................................................................................... 4 Priority 1: Improve Patient Safety ........................................................................... 4 Priority 2: Deliver Effective, Efficient, Affordable Care ........................................... 6 Priority 3: Engage Persons and Families in Their Health ..................................... 13 Priority 4: Enhance Communication and Coordination of Care ............................ 14 Priority 5: Advance Prevention ............................................................................. 15 Priority 6: Foster Healthy Communities ................................................................ 19 Priority 7: Eliminate Health Disparities ................................................................. 21 Looking to the Future—Programs and Policies in Development .................... 23 Improve Patient Safety ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Iowa Orthopedic Journal
    Designed for Wear Reduction • Improved Function • Optimal Kinematics4 VOLUME 25 2005 THERE IS A DIFFERENCE The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal DEPUY ROTATING PLATFORM KNEE 1 REDUCED WEAR BY 94% Polyethylene wear has been associated with osteolysis in the knee.2,3 * The rotating platform knee, used with GVF JOURNAL ORTHOPAEDIC THE IOWA polyethylene, reduced wear by 94% when compared to a fixed bearing knee. Results based on knee simulation testing. Available only from DePuy Orthopaedics. Trusted Innovation. 1 ASTM Symposium on Cross-linked Thermally Treated Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene for Joint Replacements (data on file). Miami Beach, Florida Nov. 5 and 6, 2002. 2 Lewis, Peter; Cecil H. Rorabeck, Robert B. Bourne and Peter Devane. “Posteromedial Tibial Polyethylene Failure in Total Knee Replacements.” CORR Feb. 1994: 11-17. 3 Cadambi, Ajai, Gerard A. Engh, Kimberly A. Dwyer and Tuyethoa N. Vinh. “Osteolysis of the Distal Femur After Total Knee Arthroplasty.” The Journal of Arthroplasty Dec. 1994: 579-594. * GVF - Gamma Vacuum Foil IMPORTANT • The presence of osteomyelitis, pyrogenic infection or other overt infection of the These include: This Essential Product Information sheet does not include all of the information nec- knee joint; essary for selection and use of a device. Please see full labeling for all necessary infor- • Patients with loss of musculature or neuromuscular compromise leading to loss of •Vascular deficiency at the bone site; mation. function in the involved limb or in whom the requirements for its use would affect •Inadequate bone stock to assure both a firm press fit and close apposition of the cut recommended rehabilitation procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Impact Assessment As a Tool for Population Health Promotion and Public Policy
    HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT AS A TOOL FOR POPULATION HEALTH PROMOTION AND PUBLIC POLICY A Report Submitted to the Health Promotion Development Division of Health Canada by Project Team: C. James Frankish, Ph.D. Lawrence W. Green, Dr. P.H. Pamela A. Ratner, Ph.D., R.N. Treena Chomik, M.P.H. Craig Larsen, M.H.A. Institute of Health Promotion Research University of British Columbia May 1996 Health Impact Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The criteria for evaluation of health, social, environmental and economic policies and programs are changing. This is particularly true within the health sector where many governments are adopting an understanding of health that includes a focus on the social and environmental determinants of health. They recognize that societal structures, attitudes and behaviours influence health profoundly, that prevention is better (or at least more timely) than cure, and that prevention is a way to reduce disability and social dependence. Consequently, how social, environmental and economic policies influence health and the prevention or production of illness, disability or death needs systematic monitoring at all levels of government. With increasing official commitment to decentralization and community participation in decision making and growing consideration of the social determinants of health, some ambiguity, and perhaps controversy, remains about what impact on health this new perspective will have, what strategies will work to achieve beneficial outcomes, what criteria should be applied to judging health impact, how health impact assessment can work to produce better decisions, and what its ultimate influence on policies and program decisions may be. Most calls for evidence-based decision making offer little indication as to how the use of health impact assessments can lead to "better" health decisions.
    [Show full text]