DOCSLIB.ORG

File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions ( PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PUBLIC Document Version: 2108 – 2021-28-08 File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions company. All rights reserved. All rights company. affiliate THE BEST RUN 2021 SAP SE or an SAP SE or an SAP SAP 2021 © Content 1 Supported File Formats....................................................... 3 File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions 2 PUBLIC Content 1 Supported File Formats This document contains the total list of all formats supported by the Visualization cloud service for SAP Enterprise Product Development, grouped by category. Native 3D CAD Formats Table 1 Version Sup­ Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions port Cloud Viewing Support tions, and Comments CATIA V5 CATPART, CAT­ R10 (See Map­ Y (No PMI, Views, High 1. Piping support is limited. PRODUCT, ping for ad­ and Polylines) 2. No electric features and CATSHAPE vanced fea­ reservations support; the tures) to R31 exception is electric splice (V5-6R2021) * points. 3. Not all Extended Work­ bench features are sup­ ported; contact us if you’re using Extended Workbench features. NX Assembly and PRT V10 to Y (No PMI, Views, High 1. Assembly-level defined Part UGNX1957 Ser­ and Polylines) views don’t work together ies, 1961 Series with exploded views (Con­ * figurations) 2. Viewset from NX file not supported 3. NX feature 'Reset Orienta­ tion' isn’t supported 4. NX feature View-set is rep­ resented as flat view list in Visual Enterprise scene 5. No support of tabular part list from model views if part list isn’t stored as part of CAD file 6. NX Arrangement contains an exploded modelview view if it was created in that arrangement File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions Supported File Formats PUBLIC 3 Version Sup­ Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions port Cloud Viewing Support tions, and Comments SolidWorks As­ SLDASM, 1999–2021 Y (No PMI, Views, High 1. Import of Construction ge­ sembly and Part and Polylines) ometry like Points, Coordi­ ASM, nate Axis, Surfaces/Curves, SLDPRT, Wireframes planes PRT 2. Missing geometry if no Par­ asolid data is present in the file 3. Only Dimension Annotation created by the DimXpert tool in SolidWorks is sup­ ported 4. Annotation Views, Default, and User-defined views not supported 5. Multiple configurations: Only resolved (activated) configurations are loaded 6. Exploded views within con­ figuration aren’t supported 7. Embedded piping not sup­ ported (assembly-level ge­ ometry) Solid Edge Assem­ ASM, ST1 to ST10, Y (No polylines) Medium 1. PMI not supported bly and Part and up to 2021 2. Section View not supported PAR, 3. Alternate Assembly not PWD, supported PSM File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions 4 PUBLIC Supported File Formats Version Sup­ Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions port Cloud Viewing Support tions, and Comments Inventor Assembly IAM, Inventor 9– Y (No polylines) Medium 1. PMI isn’t supported and Part 2021 2. Import of construction ge­ IPT ometry; for example, surfa­ ces, points, planes, and wireframes aren't sup­ ported 3. Not all assembly level fea­ tures are supported 4. No support of Persistence Identifiers and CAD Identifi- ers 5. Positional Representations not supported 6. Flexible Assemblies not supported 7. Cross-section views not supported 8. Billboarded PMI not sup­ ported CATIA V4 MODEL 4.15–4.25 Y (No polylines) Medium PMI not supported Creo Parametric ASM, Pro/E 2000i to Y (No PMI, Views, Low 1. Not all assembly level fea­ (Pro/ENGINEER) Creo Paramet­ and Polylines) tures are supported PRT Assembly and Part ric 7.0 2. No family table instance support 3. No support for connection points type 4. No support for cross-sec­ tion views Interchange and DCC (Digital Content Creation) Formats Table 2 Version Sup­ Support Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions port Cloud Viewing Level tions, and Comments Parasolid X_T V7 to V32 Y (No polylines) High Configurations not supported File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions Supported File Formats PUBLIC 5 Version Sup­ Support Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions port Cloud Viewing Level tions, and Comments PLMXML PLMXML 4 and 6 Y High 1. 2D drawing files not sup­ (Schema 6.0 ref­ ported erencing JT) 2. Materials (diffuse, opacity etc.) applied from assem­ bly to parts aren’t sup­ ported. JT Assembly and JT 6.4 up to 10.6 * Y (No PMI, Views, High 1. Import of LIBRA entities Part and Polylines) not supported 2. Import Cross section and exploded views not sup­ ported 3. Only the first section plane is imported 4. To export multiple levels of details and XTBREP with referenced JT files, source data must contain solids CREO Parametric NEU 2000i to Creo Y (No PMI, Views, Medium No support for connection Neutral (Pro/ 7.0 and Polylines) points type ENGINEER) As­ sembly and Part IGES IGES, Up to 5.3 Y (No polylines) High 1. Linked IGES files as as­ sembly isn’t supported IGS (only monolithic files sup­ ported) 2. Line style for polylines not supported STEP STEP, STEP protocols Y (No PMI, Views, High supported: and Polylines) STP, AP203 (Edition STEPZ, 1, Edition 2), AP214 (up to STPZ Edition 3), AP242 (Edition 1 IS), AP242 BO XML File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions 6 PUBLIC Supported File Formats Version Sup­ Support Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions port Cloud Viewing Level tions, and Comments CATIA Graphical CGR CGR files from Y (No polylines) High 1. CGR: Import of Construc­ Representation R10 version to tion geometry like points, R30 coordinate axis, curves (V5-6R2020) planes not supported 2. CGR: 2D drawing files not supported 3. CGR: Embedded geometry XVL type not supported CATIA V6 3DXML CATIA V6 Y (No polylines) Medium 1. No Kinematics/animation (3DXML) R2010x to support R2013x, 3DEx­ 2. No texture support perience up to 3. PMI not supported R2021 4. Metadata in scene tree is sorted in alphabetical or­ der so original order isn’t preserved. 5. Initial view isn’t respected when loaded 6. Import of Construction ge­ ometry like points, coordi­ nate axis, curves planes not supported 7. 2D drawing files not sup­ ported 8. Embedded geometry as type XVL not supported 9. Embedded geometry as type Exact not supported 10. Embedded geometry as type Dynamic tessellation not supported. ACIS Assembly SAT Versions 14 up Y Medium 2D vector data not supported and Part to 21, and up to 2019 1.0 File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions Supported File Formats PUBLIC 7 Version Sup­ Support Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions port Cloud Viewing Level tions, and Comments Industry Founda­ IFC, IFCXML 2x3, 2x4, and Y Medium 1. Scene tree hierarchy tion Classes (IFC) IFC4, IFCZIP. doesn’t group similar enti­ Format ties 2. Only geometrical represen­ tations are imported. No project, process, and oper­ ation-related information is imported. 3. Global ID from IFC used as persistence identifier 4. IFC format 2x2 isn’t sup­ ported Collada DAE Y High STL STL Y High Wavefront OBJ Y Medium No polyline import and export support Scaleable Vector SVG No <pattern> support Graphic Note See Appendices for limita­ tion details. Drawing Formats Table 3 Sup­ port Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions Version Support Cloud Viewing Level tions, and Comments CATIA V5 Draw­ CATDRAWING R10 to R30 No High ings (V5-6R2020) NX Drawing PRT NX to UGNX1953 No High Series * File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions 8 PUBLIC Supported File Formats Sup­ port Capabilities, Known Restric­ File Format Extensions Version Support Cloud Viewing Level tions, and Comments SolidWorks Draw­ SLDDRW 1999–2021* No Me­ 1. Imports cached tessellated ing dium geometry 2. Shaded geometry in a drawing is loaded as wire­ frames AutoCAD Sheet DST Up to version 7 Yes Me­ Refer to AutoCAD DWG Drawing Set dium Publishing Limitations_FP9 document for on-premise. AutoCAD Drawing DWG R11/ R12 up to R32 Yes Me­ Refer to AutoCAD DWG Drawing Object (2014- 2020) dium Publishing Limitations_FP9 document for on-premise. AutoCAD Drawing DXF R11/ R12 up to R32 Yes Me­ Refer to AutoCAD DWG Drawing Interchange (2014- 2020) dium Publishing Limitations_FP9 document for on-premise. 1. Semantic PMI not sup­ ported - Text is imported as geometry 2. Parametric object import is limited to the following types: circles, circular arcs, ellipses, elliptical arcs, text. 3. Per-face normal 4. Per-face transparency Raster Image Formats Table 4 Capabilities, Known Restrictions, and File Format Extensions Version Support Comments JPEG raster images JPG, JPEG All PNG raster images PNG All File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions Supported File Formats PUBLIC 9 Visual Enterprise File Formats Table 5 Capabilities, Known Restrictions, and File Format Extensions Version Support Comments SAP VE VDS Files VDS 4 Only VDS files generated by SAP Visual Enterprise version 9 and above Appendix: SVG Element Support Matrix Table 6 Element Supported ● svg yes ● g ● defs ● style ● circle ● ellipse ● line ● path ● polygon ● polyline ● rect ● text ● tspan ● textPath ● linearGradient ● radialGradient ● stop ● switch Behaves like <g> (no conditions evaluated) ● image Yes, for PNG and JPG (via file or data) File Format Support Matrix and Known Restrictions 10 PUBLIC Supported File Formats Element Supported ● desc no ● title ● metadata ● use ● symbol ● tref ● altGlyph ● altGlyphDef ● altGlyphItem ● glyphRef ● marker ● color-profile ● pattern ● clipPath ● mask ● feBlend ● feColorMatrix ● feComponentTransfer ● feComposite ● feFlood ● feGaussianBlur ● feImage ● feMerge ● feOffset ● feTile ● filter ●
Recommended publications
  • CAD for VEX Robotics

    CAD for VEX Robotics

    CAD for VEX Robotics (updated 7/23/20) The question of CAD comes up from time to time, so here is some information and sources you can use to help you and your students get started with CAD. “COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN” OR “COMPUTER AIDED DOCUMENTATION”? First off, the nature of VEX in general, is a highly versatile prototyping system, and this leads to “tinkerbots” (for good or bad, how many robots are truly planned out down to the specific parts prior to building?). The team that actually uses CAD for design (that is, CAD is done before building), will usually be an advanced high school team, juniors or seniors (and VEX-U teams, of course), and they will still likely use CAD only for preliminary design, then future mods and improvements will be tinkered onto the original design. The exception is 3d printed parts (U-teams only, for now) which obviously have to be designed in CAD. I will say that I’m seeing an encouraging trend that more students are looking to CAD design than in the past. One thing that has helped is that computers don’t need to be so powerful and expensive to run some of the newer CAD software…especially OnShape. Here’s some reality: most VEX people look at CAD to document their design and create neat looking renderings of their robots. If you don't have the time to learn CAD, I suggest taking pictures. Seriously though, CAD stands for Computer Aided Design, not Computer Aided Documentation. It takes time to learn, which is why community colleges have 2-year degrees in CAD, or you can take weeks of training (paid for by your employer, of course).
  • CAD-To-X3D Conversion with Product Structure and External Geometry Referencing

    CAD-To-X3D Conversion with Product Structure and External Geometry Referencing

    CAD-to-X3D Conversion with product structure and external geometry referencing Hyokwang Lee PartDB Co., Ltd. and Web3D Korea Chapter [email protected] Engineering IT & VR solutions based on International Standards CATIA Hub_Assembly model Hub_AssemblyH (1) disc_with_holes(2) cap(3) sleeve_sub_assemblyH (4) gasket(5) cylinder(6) CATIA Hub Assembly (6 Files) Simple Conversion of Hub_Assembly into X3D Save as VRML/X3D http://web3d.org/x3d/content/examples/Basic/CAD/ Simple Conversion of Hub_Assembly into X3D Save as VRML/X3D Simple Conversion of Hub_Assembly into X3D Save as VRML Product Structure disappeared!! Representing a CAD assembly in X3D . Hub_Assembly represented in a single X3D file . Assembly structure : CADAssembly, CADPart . Geometry : CADFace CatiaHubAssembly.X3D Hub_AssemblyH (1) <CADAssembly name=“Hub_Assembly”> (1) T disc_with_holes(2) <CADPart name=“disc_with_holes” ...> <CADFace> ... </CADFace> cap(3) </CADPart> <CADPart name=“cap” ...> sleeve_sub_assemblyH (4) T(2) <CADFace> ... </CADFace> (3) T(4) </CADPart> T gasket(5) CAD2X3D cylinder(6) conversion <CADAssembly name=“sleeve_sub_assembly”> <CADPart name=“gasket” ...> T(6) T(5) <CADFace> ... </CADFace> </CADPart> . Transform information is applied to the leaf node <CADPart name=“cylinder” ...> which includes geometry. <CADFace> ... </CADFace> CATIA Hub Assembly ex) Tcylinder = T(1)*T(4)*T(6) </CADPart> (6 Files) </CADAssembly> </CADAssembly> Representing a CAD assembly in X3D . Hub_Assembly represented in a single X3D file . Assembly structure : CADAssembly, CADPart . Geometry : CADFace CatiaHubAssembly.X3D Hub_AssemblyH (1) <CADAssembly name=“Hub_Assembly”> (1) T disc_with_holes(2) <CADPart name=“disc_with_holes” ...> • Partial change <CADFace > ... </CADFace> cap(3) </CADPart> • Reusability <CADPart name=“cap” ...> sleeve_sub_assemblyH (4) T(2) <CADFace> ... </CADFace> (3) T(4) </CADPart> T gasket(5) CAD2X3D cylinder(6) conversion <CADAssembly name=“sleeve_sub_assembly”> <CADPart name=“gasket” ...> T(6) T(5) <CADFace> ..
  • 3D PDF Converter™ Detailing New Features, Bug Fixes and Updated Format Support

    3D PDF Converter™ Detailing New Features, Bug Fixes and Updated Format Support

    Version 4.1 Release Notes Release notes for 3D PDF Converter™ detailing new features, bug fixes and updated format support. 3D PDF Converter Version 4.1 Table of Contents OVERVIEW................................................................................................................................................... 2 Version Information ............................................................................................................................ 2 Language Support Overview ................................................................................................................ 2 Definition of Release Types ................................................................................................................. 2 Acrobat Pro Compatibility ........................................................................................................................... 3 Licensing Changes ....................................................................................................................................... 3 New 3D PDF Converter License Key Required .................................................................................... 3 4.1 Improvements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Format Updates .................................................................................................................................. 4 New Features/Enhancements ...........................................................................................................
  • Augmented Reality Applications in the Engineering Environment

    Augmented Reality Applications in the Engineering Environment

    Augmented Reality Applications in the Engineering Environment Karle Olalde Azkorreta1 and Héctor Olmedo Rodríguez2 1 University of Basque Country, UPV/EHU; C/Nieves Cano 12. 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain [email protected] 2 Universidad de Valladolid; Campus Miguel Delives s/n. 47014 Valladolid, Spain [email protected] Abstract. In the area of engineering, we can move much in the way clients generally can interact with models or designs for new products, so we are developing various alternatives for visualization, such as Virtual and Augmented realities based on accurate models with no need of using specific software. In order to have a better and global knowledge of the possibilities we show in this paper the situation and capabilities of these technologies. From models developed with commercial programs and tools for industrial design, we propose a workflow to give everybody a chance to interact with these models. The sectors where these technologies are applied and the services offered are grouped in Industrial production systems and Learning of related disciplines. At the end conclusions will be given with every reference used. With everything, ideas for improving these technologies and the correspondent applications could be suggested to the reader. Keywords: Collaboration technology and informal learning, Augmented and virtual Reality, engineering, models. 1 Introduction In this paper we try to analyze the different options we have to represent an object in augmented reality, from 3D design programs and engineering, such as Catia, Solid Edge, Solid Works, Autocad, etc., with the objective of product design or do it more accessible to all potential customers. Augmented Reality (AR) [1, 2] is a technology in which the vision for the user in the real world is enhanced or augmented with additional information generated from a computer model.
  • Lightweight Formats for Product Model Data Exchange and Preservation

    Lightweight Formats for Product Model Data Exchange and Preservation

    Lightweight Formats for Product Model Data Exchange and Preservation Alexander Ball (1), Lian Ding (2), Manjula Patel (1) (1) UKOLN, University of Bath Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom EMail: [email protected] EMail: [email protected] (2) IdMRC, University of Bath Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom EMail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The designs for engineered products are increasingly defined not by technical drawings but by three-dimensional Computer Aided Design (CAD) models. With rapid turnover of computer hardware and CAD software, these models are in danger of becoming unreadable long before their usefulness has ended. One possible approach is to migrate the models into lightweight formats that are easier to preserve and from which it will be easier to recover information in the future. Such formats also have benefits for design collaboration and dissemination of product model information. Selecting the right lightweight format to use remains a problem, but considering matters of model fidelity, metadata support, security features, file size, software support, and openness, the difference between the formats is not as significant as their common advantages over full-featured, complex models. Product model data, lightweight representations, digital curation INTRODUCTION Since the turn of the millennium, the engineering sector has been undergoing a paradigm shift in the way that products are designed and manufactured or constructed. Formerly, Computer Aided Design (CAD) tools were used simply to generate blueprints and other two dimensional technical drawings, so that the official description of the product could be set down on paper. Increasingly, though, three-dimensional (3D) CAD models are being integrated into the engineering workflow, being used as the basis of finite element analysis, stereolithographic prototyping, numerical control part programmes and product inspections, for example.
  • Development of a Coupling Approach for Multi-Physics Analyses of Fusion Reactors

    Development of a Coupling Approach for Multi-Physics Analyses of Fusion Reactors

    Development of a coupling approach for multi-physics analyses of fusion reactors Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Ingenieurwissenschaften (Dr.-Ing.) bei der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Maschinenbau des Karlsruher Instituts fur¨ Technologie (KIT) genehmigte DISSERTATION von Yuefeng Qiu Datum der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 12. 05. 2016 Referent: Prof. Dr. Stieglitz Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Moslang¨ This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Share Alike 3.0 DE License (CC BY-SA 3.0 DE): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/ Abstract Fusion reactors are complex systems which are built of many complex components and sub-systems with irregular geometries. Their design involves many interdependent multi- physics problems which require coupled neutronic, thermal hydraulic (TH) and structural mechanical (SM) analyses. In this work, an integrated system has been developed to achieve coupled multi-physics analyses of complex fusion reactor systems. An advanced Monte Carlo (MC) modeling approach has been first developed for converting complex models to MC models with hybrid constructive solid and unstructured mesh geometries. A Tessellation-Tetrahedralization approach has been proposed for generating accurate and efficient unstructured meshes for describing MC models. For coupled multi-physics analyses, a high-fidelity coupling approach has been developed for the physical conservative data mapping from MC meshes to TH and SM meshes. Interfaces have been implemented for the MC codes MCNP5/6, TRIPOLI-4 and Geant4, the CFD codes CFX and Fluent, and the FE analysis platform ANSYS Workbench. Furthermore, these approaches have been implemented and integrated into the SALOME simulation platform. Therefore, a coupling system has been developed, which covers the entire analysis cycle of CAD design, neutronic, TH and SM analyses.
  • 3Dviewstation File Formats

    3Dviewstation File Formats

    Supported Formats of the 3DViewStation product family 3DViewStation Supported Formats of the 3DViewStation product family Import 3D Desktop WebViewer s r e t d d r r e e o e c c t p n r n w c a a o m i e i i s v v p l a V Supported 3D File d l x d b a a e a b e Formats File Extension Format Version D D D D D W 2 2 3 3 2 3D-PDF PDF PRC, U3D 3DViewStation 3DVS, VSXML ACIS SAT, SAB Up to 2019 Autodesk 3DS 3DS Autodesk Design DWF, DWFX Web Format Autodesk Inventor IPT, IAM Up to 2020 CATIA V4 MODEL, DLV, EXP, Up to V4.2.5 SESSION CATIA V5 CATPRODUCT, Up to V5-6 R2019 CATPART, CATShape, (R29) CGR, 3DXML CATIA V6 3DXML Up to V5-6 R2019 (R29) COLLADA DAE CPIXML CPIXML Creo (Pro/E) PRT, XPR, ASM, XAS, Pro/Engineer 19.0 to NEU Creo 6.0 Filmbox FBX ASCII: from 7100 to 7400; Binary: all GL Transmission GLTF, GLB Version 2.0 only Format HiCAD KRA, SZA Information as per November 12th 2019, valid for the latest build, subject to change without notice at any time 1 3DViewStation Supported Formats of the 3DViewStation product family Desktop WebViewer s r e t d d r r e e o e c c t p n r n w c a a o m i e i i s v v p l a Supported 3D File d l x V d b a a e a b e Formats File Extension Format Version D D D D D 2 2 3 3 W 2 I-deas MF1, ARC, UNV, PKG Up to 13.x (NX 5), NX I-deas 6 IGES IGS, IGES 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 Industry Foundation IFC IFC 2x2, 2x3, 2x4 Classes JTOpen JT Up to 10.2 LIDAR Point Cloud E57 Data File1 NX (Unigraphics) PRT UG v11.0 to v1847 Parasolid X_T, X_B Up to v31.1 PLMXML PLMXML PRC PRC Autodesk Revit2 RVT, RFA 2015 to 2019 Rhino3D 3DM 4, 5, 6 Solid Edge ASM, PAR, PWD, PSM V19 – 20, ST – ST10, 2019 SolidWorks SLDASM, SLDPRT From 97 up to 2019 STEP Exchange STP, STEP, STPZ AP 203 E1/E2, AP 214, AP 242 STEP/XML STPX, STPXZ Stereo Lithography STL All versions Universal 3D U3D ECMA-363 (1-3.
  • Evaluation of Shipbuilding Cadicam Systems (Phase I)

    Evaluation of Shipbuilding Cadicam Systems (Phase I)

    Final Report EVALUATION OF SHIPBUILDING CADICAM SYSTEMS (PHASE I) Submitted to: U.S. Navy by: National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. San Diego, CA 92186 Project Director: John Horvath Principal Investigator: Richard C. Moore October 1996 Technical Report Documentaition Page- 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Waiog No. I I 4. Title and Subtitle I 5. Repon Date October 14. 1996 Evaluation of Shipbuilding CADICAM Systems 6. Performing Organization C e (Phase I) '32%'2.7 8. Performing Organization Report Ilo. 7. Author(s) Richard C. Moore UMTRI-96-35 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 11. Contracl or Grant No. 290 1 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, .Michigan 48 109-2150 PQ# MU7.56606-D - 13. Typ of Report and Period Coverud 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. 28th St. & Harbor ~r. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code San Diego, CA 92 1 13 US. Navy 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report is the Phase I final report of the National Shipbuilding Research F'rogram (NSRP) project (Project Number 4-94-1) to evaluate world-class shipbuilders' existing CADICAMICIM system implementations. Five U.S. shipyards participated in this study along with personnel from University of Michigan, Proteus Engineering, and Cybo Robots. Project participants have backgrounds in design, computer-aided design (CAD), n~anufacturingprocesses, computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), production planning, and computer-integrated manufacturing/management (CIM). The results of this evaluation provided the basis for the CADICAMICIM Workshop presented in conjunction with the 1996 Ship Production Symposium, and will be used as background in Phase I1 of the project to develop requirements for future shipbuilding CADICAMICIM systems.
  • R-Photo User's Manual

    R-Photo User's Manual

    User's Manual © R-Tools Technology Inc 2020. All rights reserved. www.r-tt.com © R-tools Technology Inc 2020. All rights reserved. No part of this User's Manual may be copied, altered, or transferred to, any other media without written, explicit consent from R-tools Technology Inc.. All brand or product names appearing herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. R-tools Technology Inc. has developed this User's Manual to the best of its knowledge, but does not guarantee that the program will fulfill all the desires of the user. No warranty is made in regard to specifications or features. R-tools Technology Inc. retains the right to make alterations to the content of this Manual without the obligation to inform third parties. Contents I Table of Contents I Start 1 II Quick Start Guide in 3 Steps 1 1 Step 1. Di.s..k.. .S..e..l.e..c..t.i.o..n.. .............................................................................................................. 1 2 Step 2. Fi.l.e..s.. .M..a..r..k.i.n..g.. ................................................................................................................ 4 3 Step 3. Re..c..o..v..e..r.y.. ...................................................................................................................... 6 III Features 9 1 File Sorti.n..g.. .............................................................................................................................. 9 2 File Sea.r.c..h.. ............................................................................................................................
  • Chapter 18 Solidworks

    Chapter 18 Solidworks

    Chapter 18 SolidWorks As much as any company in the CAD industry, SolidWorks was inspired by the vision of a single individual, Jon Hirschtick. He received both a BS and an MS degree in mechanical engineering from MIT in 1983 and subsequently worked at the MIT CAD Laboratory under Dr. David Gossard. Hirschtick had a strong entrepreneurial streak in him from an early age including a period as a self-employed magician during high school. While working at the CAD Laboratory, he enrolled in an entrepreneurship class in 1987 where he teamed up with Axel Bichara to write a business plan for a new CAD software company they called Premise. Bichara was a graduate student from Germany who was also working at the CAD Laboratory at the time.1 The class business plan for Premise was submitted in mid-May, 1987 and in a little over a month the two founders had $1.5 million in venture funding from Harvard Management Company. It was no surprise that the company set up shop in Cambridge. Figure 18.1 Jon Hirschtick2 Premise’s initial software product, DesignView, was a two-dimension conceptual design tool that ran on IBM-compatible PCs and interfaced with Microsoft software packages such as Word and Excel. Users could sketch geometry, assign constraints and define dimensional relationships. If a dimension changed, the design would adapt to this new information. Since it could be interfaced to Excel, spreadsheets could be used to 1 Bygrave, William D. and D’Heilly, Dan – editors, The Portable MBA in Entrepreneurship Case Studies, Pg.
  • Opentext Brava Enterprise Supported Formats

    Opentext Brava Enterprise Supported Formats

    OpenText™ Brava!™ Enterprise Supported Formats This list represents the current known, tested formats supported by Brava! Enterprise. On a Windows operating system, Brava! uses 64-bit technology and typically supports any format with access to a Windows-based application that supports the print canonical verb. Linux Publishing Agent compatibility is noted where applicable. Please contact us with any format questions. 2D CAD FORMATS EXTENSION LINUX SUPPORT 906/907 Plot File 906/907 Autodesk AutoCAD Drawing (through version 2020) DWG ✓ Autodesk AutoCAD DXF (through version 2020) DXF ✓ Autodesk Design Web Format (through version 2020) DWF, DWFX ✓ Bentley Tiled Group 4 Raster TG4 ✓ CADKEY PRT Computer Graphics Metafile CGM GTX Group III, IV G3, G4 GTX Runlength RNL HP CAD ME10 (through version 13) CMI, MI HPGL Plot File 000, HGL, PLT, HPGL ✓ Intergraph Group IV CIT ✓ Intergraph Runlength RLE IronCAD drawing – embedded PDF ICD MicroStation Drawing (through version 8.11, including XM, V8i) DGN ✓ The Information Company 1 2020-09 16 EP7 Brava! Enterprise Formats 3D CAD FORMATS 1 EXTENSION LINUX SUPPORT Adobe 3D PDF 7 PDF ✓ Autodesk AutoCAD Drawing DWG ✓ Autodesk Design Web Format DWF ✓ Autodesk Inventor (through version 2019) IPT, IAM ✓ Autodesk Revit 8 (2015 to 2020) RVT, RFA ✓ CATIA V4 MODEL, SESSION, DLV, EXP ✓ CATIA V5 CATPart, CATProduct, ✓ CATShape, CGR CATIA V6 3DXML ✓ HOOPS Streaming Format 2 HSF ✓ I-DEAS and NX I-DEAS 6 MF1, ARC, UNV, PKG ✓ Industry Foundation Classes (versions 2, 3, 4) IFC ✓ Initial Graphics Exchange Specification
  • Simulation Modelling for Computer Aided Design of Secondary Aerodynamic Wing Surfaces Aleksandr A

    Simulation Modelling for Computer Aided Design of Secondary Aerodynamic Wing Surfaces Aleksandr A

    Advances in Systems Science and Application (2015) Vol.15 No.4 338-350 Simulation Modelling for Computer Aided Design of Secondary Aerodynamic Wing Surfaces Aleksandr A. Gorbunov, Aleksej D. Pripadchev, Irina S. Bykova and Valerij V. Elagin Federal State Educational Government-financed Institution of Higher Professional Education, Orenburg State University, Orenburg region, Russia Abstract The simulation modelling technique of secondary aerodynamic wing surface of the long-haul aircraft using a high-precision mathematical simulation in the aerody- namics and hydrodynamics computer programme has been formulated in the present article. The method proposed is based on the modern methods in the field of computer-aided design of aircraft using CATIA three-dimensional sim- ulation and simulation modelling in SALOME environment. The use of high- precision mathematical simulation in computer-aided design of secondary aero- dynamic wing surfaces allows us to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of the secondary aerodynamic surface of the model developed and to verify the previous results of the project definition. Keywords Secondary aerodynamic surfaces; High-precision computer mathemat- ical simulation; Simulation model; A long-haul aircraft; Synthesis; Design au- tomation; Project procedures; Three-dimensional modelling 1 Introduction Building the new long-haul aircraft (A/C) with improved performance character- istics and enhancing the currently used aircraft is effected in various ways. One of them is improving its aerodynamics depending largely on the A/C look. In our view, the most rational way to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the A/C is to install the secondary aerodynamic surfaces (SAS) at the wingtip. The use of SAS reduces the induced drag of the aircraft, enhances the effective wing aspect-ratio and ascensional power at the wingtip, improves A/C longitu- dinal/transverse stability, reduces specific fuel consumption, cuts takeoff run and landing roll of the aircraft.