DOCSLIB.ORG

Arundo Donax Distribution and Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arundo Donax Distribution and Impact Report Arundo donax Distribution and Impact Report March 2011 Agreement No. 06-374-559-0 State Water Resources Control Board Prepared by: California Invasive Plant Council Arundo donax (giant reed): Distribution and Impact Report March 2011 Agreement: No. 06-374-559-0 Submitted to: State Water Resources Control Board Submitted by: California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) Authors: Jason Giessow, Dendra Inc. (Chapters 2, 4.2, 5.2, 6-10) Jason Casanova, Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council (Chapters 3, 5.2) Rene Leclerc, Robert MacArthur, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (Chapter 5.1) Genie Fleming, Consultant (Chapter 4.1) Jesse Giessow (Else), Dendra Inc. (Chapter 1) With contributions by: Elizabeth Brusati, Cal-IPC John Tangenberg, Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council Brad Roth, Consultant Doug Johnson, Cal-IPC This report and spatial data set (GIS geo-database) are available for download at: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/research/arundo/index.php or http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/mapping/arundo/index.php The spatial data set is also viewable at the DFG BIOS web site: http://bios.dfg.ca.gov/ BIOS project data sets are named: Invasive Plants (Species) - Central_So. Cal Coastal Watersheds [ds645] Invasive Plants (Prct Cover) - Central_So. Cal Coastal Watersheds [ds646] TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 ARUNDO BIOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Physiology......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Genetic variation............................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Physical Structure ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Biomass and Cane Density ............................................................................................................. 21 2.5 Growth Rate.................................................................................................................................... 23 2.6 Reproduction and Spread................................................................................................................ 24 2.6.1 Within Stand Spread ................................................................................................................ 24 2.6.2 Spread Within A Watershed..................................................................................................... 25 2.6.3 Historic Air photo Analysis: Stand Growth Rates and Spread Within Watershed.................. 26 2.6.4 Spread Between Watersheds.................................................................................................... 26 2.7 Ecological Function: Abiotic and Biotic......................................................................................... 26 2.7.1 Abiotic..................................................................................................................................... 26 2.7.2 Biotic....................................................................................................................................... 27 2.7.2.1 Vegetation........................................................................................................................ 27 2.7.2.2 Arthropods ....................................................................................................................... 27 2.7.2.3 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................ 28 2.8 Arundo Biology: Conclusions......................................................................................................... 29 3.0 SPATIAL DATA SET: The Distribution and Abundance of Arundo from Monterey to Mexico......... 30 3.1 Methodology................................................................................................................................... 30 3.1.1. Step-by-Step Process............................................................................................................. 30 3.1.2. Data Quality.......................................................................................................................... 34 3.2 Results: Acreage by Watershed and Region................................................................................... 37 3.3 Conclusions: Distribution and Abundance ..................................................................................... 38 4.0 IMPACTS OF ARUNDO: Arundo Water Use and Stand Transpiration............................................ 40 4.1 Determining Arundo Water Use (Stand transpiration) ................................................................... 40 4.1.1 Background:............................................................................................................................. 40 4.1.2 Methods.................................................................................................................................... 40 4.1.3 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 46 4.2 Arundo Water Use Across Study Area ........................................................................................... 47 5.0 IMPACTS OF ARUNDO: Hydrology, Geomorphology and Flooding .............................................. 50 5.1 Hydraulics, Sediment Transport, Geomorphology ......................................................................... 50 5.1.1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 50 5.1.2 Arundo and River Morphology ................................................................................................ 51 5.1.2.1 Arundo in the River Environment..................................................................................... 51 Arundo donax Distribution and Impact Report i General Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 51 Dispersal & Establishment........................................................................................................ 52 Rates of Spread ......................................................................................................................... 52 Erosion of Arundo Stands by Floods ........................................................................................ 52 5.1.2.2 Observed Effects on Rivers .............................................................................................. 53 Introduction and Context .......................................................................................................... 53 Long-term Historical Studies.................................................................................................... 53 General Observations................................................................................................................ 53 Trends in Width and Planform.................................................................................................. 54 Vertical Adjustments of the Bed and Floodplain...................................................................... 54 Lateral Migration and Bank Erosion......................................................................................... 55 5.1.2.3 Observed Effects on Hydraulics and Sediment Transport................................................ 55 Response to Arundo Removal or Eradication........................................................................... 56 5.1.2.4 Summary of Understanding .............................................................................................. 56 5.1.3 Southern California Study Streams.......................................................................................... 57 5.1.3.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 57 5.1.3.2 Study Streams ................................................................................................................... 57 5.1.3.3 CAL-IPC GIS Analysis..................................................................................................... 57 5.1.3.4 Study Stream Characteristics ............................................................................................ 58 General Morphology................................................................................................................. 58 Arundo Characteristics.............................................................................................................. 59 5.1.4. Santa Margarita River Case Study ......................................................................................... 63 5.1.4.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 63 5.1.4.2 Santa Margarita Watershed..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of the Combustion Characteristics of Four Perennial Energy Crops (Arundo Donax, Cynara Cardunculus, Miscanthus X Giganteus and Panicum Virgatum)
    2nd World Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, 10-14 May 2004, Rome, Italy EVALUATION OF THE COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS OF FOUR PERENNIAL ENERGY CROPS (ARUNDO DONAX, CYNARA CARDUNCULUS, MISCANTHUS X GIGANTEUS AND PANICUM VIRGATUM) Jonas Dahl & Ingwald Obernberger Institute of Resource Efficient and Sustainable Systems, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 25, A - 8010 Graz, Austria, Tel.: +43 (0)316 481300, Fax: +43 (0)316 481300 4; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The perennial crops giant reed, switchgrass, miscanthus and cardoon were investigated in laboratory- scale and pilot-scale combustion test runs. Laboratory-scale test runs were conducted in a fixed bed pot reactor monitoring the temperature in the fuel bed and the release of gaseous components while pilot-scale test runs where conducted in a 150 kWth rotating grate fired combustion plant measuring formed emissions of CO, NOX, SO2, HCl, and particulates as well as performing deposit probe measurements. The results revealed that the high concentration of ash and slag forming elements such as Si, K and Ca cause severe problems regarding slagging if not specially considered during combustion. Moreover, high concentrations of N are another challenge regarding measures in order to avoid high emissions of NOx. Moreover, also HCl and SO2 emissions are considerably higher compared to wood fuels due to the higher concentrations of Cl and S in these fuels. Keywords: biomass characteristics, biomass conversion, cynara cardonculus, giant reed, switchgrass, miscanthus 1 INTRODUCTION combustion unit (nominal boiler capacity 150 kWth) were carried out with larger amounts (2-4 tons) of Due to the limited availability of wood fuels, in pelletised switch grass and chopped giant reed and southern Europe, high yield energy crops could give an chopped miscanthus (MI).
    [Show full text]
  • Arundo Donax
    FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY POLICY STATEMENT ON ARUNDO DONAX The Florida Native Plant Society opposes the agricultural production of Arundo donax (giant reed, e- grass, bamboo reed, arundo grass, giant bamboo reed, etc.) as a biofuel in Florida due to its invasive characteristics and empirical evidence of impact on native plant communities. The Society further encourages the eradication of existing stands of this species and the banning of its sale as an ornamental to prevent invasion of native plant habitats in Florida. ---Approved by the Board of Directors of the Florida Native Plant Society on October 28, 2006. BACKGROUND Arundo donax is a large, clumping grass species native to the Indian subcontinent and possibly to adjacent areas of Asia and eastern Europe. It has been spread across most tropical to warm-temperate regions of the globe for various reasons including but not limited to ornamental horticulture, erosion control, reed production for musical instruments, thatch, biomass production (biofuel), and building materials. Outside its native range, Arundo donax is believed to be sterile or nearly sterile and most if not all reproduction is by fragmentation of rhizomes and production of new roots from stems at nodes (Dudley, in press). It is found primarily in riverine habitats where it is broken up and spread during high water events (Else, 1996 as cited in Dudley, in press) and where, once introduced, it spreads vegetatively forming large, dense masses. A single clone can cover hundreds of acres (Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk, 2005). Spread between riverine systems is rarely addressed in the literature with 1) rare viable seed, 2) movement on equipment, 3) deliberate introduction by humans, 4) and occasional movement of plant fragments by animals or humans being known or hypothesized.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification of Commercialized Medicinal Plants in Southern Morocco
    Molecular Identification of Commercialized Medicinal Plants in Southern Morocco Anneleen Kool1*., Hugo J. de Boer1.,A˚ sa Kru¨ ger2, Anders Rydberg1, Abdelaziz Abbad3, Lars Bjo¨ rk1, Gary Martin4 1 Department of Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2 Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, 3 Laboratory of Biotechnology, Protection and Valorisation of Plant Resources, Faculty of Science Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco, 4 Global Diversity Foundation, Dar Ylane, Marrakech, Morocco Abstract Background: Medicinal plant trade is important for local livelihoods. However, many medicinal plants are difficult to identify when they are sold as roots, powders or bark. DNA barcoding involves using a short, agreed-upon region of a genome as a unique identifier for species– ideally, as a global standard. Research Question: What is the functionality, efficacy and accuracy of the use of barcoding for identifying root material, using medicinal plant roots sold by herbalists in Marrakech, Morocco, as a test dataset. Methodology: In total, 111 root samples were sequenced for four proposed barcode regions rpoC1, psbA-trnH, matK and ITS. Sequences were searched against a tailored reference database of Moroccan medicinal plants and their closest relatives using BLAST and Blastclust, and through inference of RAxML phylograms of the aligned market and reference samples. Principal Findings: Sequencing success was high for rpoC1, psbA-trnH, and ITS, but low for matK. Searches using rpoC1 alone resulted in a number of ambiguous identifications, indicating insufficient DNA variation for accurate species-level identification. Combining rpoC1, psbA-trnH and ITS allowed the majority of the market samples to be identified to genus level.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathland 700 the Park & Poor's Allotment Species List
    The Park & Poor's Allotment Bioblitz 25th - 26th July 2015 Common Name Scientific Name [if known] Site recorded Fungus Xylaria polymorpha Dead Man's Fingers Both Amanita excelsa var. excelsa Grey Spotted Amanita Poor's Allotment Panaeolus sp. Poor's Allotment Phallus impudicus var. impudicus Stinkhorn The Park Mosses Sphagnum denticulatum Cow-horn Bog-moss Both Sphagnum fimbriatum Fringed Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum papillosum Papillose Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum squarrosum Spiky Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum palustre Blunt-leaved Bog-moss Poor's Allotment Atrichum undulatum Common Smoothcap Both Polytrichum commune Common Haircap The Park Polytrichum formosum Bank Haircap Both Polytrichum juniperinum Juniper Haircap The Park Tetraphis pellucida Pellucid Four-tooth Moss The Park Schistidium crassipilum Thickpoint Grimmia Poor's Allotment Fissidens taxifolius Common Pocket-moss The Park Ceratodon purpureus Redshank The Park Dicranoweisia cirrata Common Pincushion Both Dicranella heteromalla Silky Forklet-moss Both Dicranella varia Variable Forklet-moss The Park Dicranum scoparium Broom Fork-moss Both Campylopus flexuosus Rusty Swan-neck Moss Poor's Allotment Campylopus introflexus Heath Star Moss Both Campylopus pyriformis Dwarf Swan-neck Moss The Park Bryoerythrophyllum Red Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Barbula convoluta Lesser Bird's-claw Beard-moss The Park Didymodon fallax Fallacious Beard-moss The Park Didymodon insulanus Cylindric Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Zygodon conoideus Lesser Yoke-moss The Park Zygodon viridissimus Green Yoke-moss
    [Show full text]
  • Jason Giessow Testimony
    Raszka Shelley From: Gallagher Chuck Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:50 AM To: Raszka Shelley Subject: FW: testimony on HB 2183 Attachments: Cal-IPCNews_Winter2015.pdf From: Jason Giessow [ mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:49 AM To: Gallagher Chuck Subject: testimony on HB 2183 Hi Chuck- I was the primary author on this Impact Assessment for CA. It is posted at this web site: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/research/arundo/index.php Basically- no one should be growing Arundo, it is destroying riverine systems in CA and Texas. There are entire conferences about how to control Arundo and tamarisk (the Deadly Duo). In the report is a CBA for coastal watersheds in CA and estimates $380 million dollars in damage . It destroys habitat- but also severely impacts flooding, fire, and water (the impact report has a chapter on each). That is why folks from both sides of the isle work on eradicating this plant. Planting it for commercial use is exceedingly dangerous, should be banned, or bonded at very high levels. CA has spent about $100 million dollars dealing with Arundo and its impacts (mostly state bond funds dealing with water: conservation, conveyance, and improvement). New state funding (Proposition 1) for water conservation and river conveyance will likely increase state funding for Arundo control to over $200 million dollars. Don’t let Oregon follow this trajectory. This recent article (attached- page 10) on the Salinas River Arundo program is one example of the impacts caused by Arundo, the complicated regulatory approval required to work on the issue, the high cost of the program, and most important- the farmers and landowners who pay the price for the impacts caused by Arundo (flooding, less water, fire, etc….).
    [Show full text]
  • Alhagi Maurorum
    Prepared By Jacob Higgs and Tim Higgs Class 1A EDRR- Early Detection Rapid Response Watch List Common crupina Crupina vulgaris African rue Peganum harmala Small bugloss Anchusa arvensis Mediterranean sage Salvia aethiopis Spring millet Milium vernale Syrian beancaper Zygophyllum fabago North Africa grass Ventenata dubia Plumeless thistle Carduus acanthiodes Malta thistle Centaurea melitensis Common Crupina Crupina vulgaris African rue Peganum harmala Small bugloss Anchusa arvensis Mediterranean sage Salvia aethiopis Spring millet Milium vernale Syrian beancaper Zygophyllum fabago North Africa grass Ventenata dubia Plumeless thistle Carduus acanthiodes Malta thistle Centaurea melitensis m Class 1B Early Detection Camelthorn Alhagi maurorum Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata Purple starthistle Cantaurea calcitrapa Goatsrue Galega officinalis African mustard Brassica tournefortii Giant Reed Arundo donax Japanese Knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum Vipers bugloss Echium vulgare Elongated mustard Brassica elongate Common St. Johnswort Hypericum perforatum L. Oxeye daisy Leucanthemum vulgare Cutleaf vipergrass Scorzonera laciniata Camelthorn Alhagi maurorum Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata Purple starthistle Cantaurea calcitrapa Goatsrue Galega officinalis African mustard Brassica tournefortii Giant Reed Arundo donax Japanese Knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum Vipers bugloss Echium vulgare Elongated mustard Brassica elongate Common St. Johnswort Hypericum perforatum L. Oxeye daisy Leucanthemum vulgare Cutleaf vipergrass Scorzonera laciniata Class 2 Control
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Management of Arundo Donax, and Approaches to Riparian Habitat Restoration in Southern California
    ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF ARUNDO DONAX, AND APPROACHES TO RIPARIAN HABITAT RESTORATION IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. Gary P. Bell The Nature Conservancy of New Mexico, 212 E. Marcy Street, Suite 200, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA Abstract By far the greatest threat to the dwindling riparian resources of coastal southern California is the alien grass species known as Arundo donax. Over the last 25 years the riparian forests of coastal southern California have become infested with A. donax which has spread by flood-fragmentation and dispersal of vegetative propagules. Arundo donax dramatically alters the ecological/successional processes in riparian systems and ultimately moves most riparian habitats towards pure stands of this alien grass. By current estimates there are tens of thousands of acres of A. donax along the major coastal drainage systems of southern California, including the Santa Ana, Santa Margarita, Ventura, Santa Clara, San Diego, and San Luis Rey rivers. The removal of A. donax from these systems provides numerous downstream benefits in terms of native species habitat, wildfire protection, water quantity and water quality. Introduction Arundo L. is a genus of tall perennial reed-like grasses (Poaceae) with six species native to warmer parts of the Old World. Arundo donax L. (giant reed, bamboo reed, giant reed grass, arundo grass, donax cane, giant cane, river cane, bamboo cane, canne de Provence), is the largest member of the genus and is among the largest of the grasses, growing to a height of 8 m (Fig. 1). This species is believed to be native to freshwaters of eastern Asia (Polunin and Huxley 1987), but has been cultivated throughout Asia, southern Europe, north Africa, and the Middle East for thousands of years and has been planted widely in North and South America and Australasia in the past century (Perdue 1958, Zohary 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • An Armored Scale Released for Biological Control of Giant Reed, Arundo Donax
    112 Session 3 Non-Traditional Biological Control Agents Rhizaspidiotus donacis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), an Armored Scale Released for Biological Control of Giant Reed, Arundo donax P. J. Moran1, J. A. Goolsby2, A. E. Racelis2, E. Cortés3, M. A. Marcos-García3, A. A. Kirk4 and J. J. Adamczyk5 1U. S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Exotic and Inva- sive Weeds Research Unit, 800 Buchanan St., Albany, CA 94710 USA Email: [email protected] 2USDA-ARS, Cattle Fever Tick Research Laboratory, Moore Air Base, 22675 N. Moorefield Rd., Edinburg, TX 78541 USA Email: [email protected] 3Instituto de Biodiversidad CIBIO. Universidad de Alicante, Campus Universitario San Vicente del Raspeig, 03080, Alicante, Spain Email: [email protected] 4USDA-ARS, European Biological Control Laboratory, CS 90023 Montferrier-sur-Lez, 34988 Sant Gely du Fesc (Montpelier), France Email: [email protected] 5USDA-ARS, Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory, 810 Hwy 26 West, PO Box 287, Poplarville, MS 39470 USA Email: [email protected] Abstract Non-native, invasive perennial grasses have not been widely targeted for classical biological control with insects, despite their global prevalence and damaging effects, in part because of a perceived paucity of host-specific insect herbivores. Armored scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) have not been used for biological weed control. However, over 250 armored scale species occur on grasses, of which 87% feed only on this family and 58% feed on only one grass genus, suggesting that armored scales may have unrealized biological control potential. We selected the armored scale Rhizaspidiotus donacis Leonardi as a candidate agent against the exotic, invasive, water-consuming grass known as giant reed (Arundo donax L.), based on literature records and our collections indicating host-specificity to the genus Arundo and its broad geographic range in the Mediterranean basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ammophila Poster
    Genetic Structure of Natural and Restored Populations of Ammophila breviligulata By Eileen Sirkin, Susanne Masi, and Jeremie Fant. Ammophila breviligulata at Ammophila breviligulata from Chicago Botanic Garden, Glencoe IL, 60022 Illinois Beach State Park Michigan side of the lake Dune Restorations: Importance of Beachgrass Chicago Lakefront Collection Area Illinois Beach State Park Distribution of Clones in Illinois Beachgrass samples were collected at: American Beachgrass, Ammophila breviligulata, is one of the first Illinois Beach State Park (natural) A comparison of the distribution of individual clones showed that plants to colonize sandy shores beyond the water’s edge. It functions Kathy Osterman Beach (natural) many of the spontaneous beaches shared clones, suggesting that to create and stabilize the beach and dune system, because of its Montrose Beach (natural/augmented) these had spread throughout the region. The nursery stock was tolerance of unstable beachfront conditions and ability to spread South Shore Beach (restored) comprised of a single clone, which was also identified on two of the utilizing underground rhizomes. The importance of Beachgrass for Questions Rainbow Beach (natural) planted beaches, suggesting that this supplier might have been the creating and stabilizing dunes has been recognized since at least 1958 source of the planted material. This clone was also found in many (Olson, 1958). In our own Lake Michigan shoreline study area, This genetic analysis focused on answering of the spontaneous populations, suggesting it is of local origin Beachgrass has been introduced at several Chicago lakefront sites, as two questions. First, what is the natural (assuming it was not introduced by planting). South Shore, a well as in surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasives and Biofuels
    Invasives and Biofuels Roger C. Anderson School of Biological Sciences Illinois State University Biofuel derived substitutes for petroleum • Two categories of liquid biofuels – First generation • Ethanol (from plant starch, sugar) • Biodiesel (from plant & animal oils) • Methanol (wood) – Second generation • Ceullosic ethanol production • Woody plants and grasses First Generation Biofuels • Examples: Corn, Soybeans, sunflower, sugar cane • Costly: Requires high input of resources – Fertilizer, pesticides, tillage – Utilization prime agricultural land • Degrades natural resources – Dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico • Human food chain • Generally, will not persist without human intervention – Rarely invasive Second Generation Biofuels • Uses grasses, herbs, and trees • Grown on marginal, lower productivity land • Neutral to negative carbon budget Miscanthus giganteus • Low resource demand (fertilizer, pesticides) • Not in human food chains • Perennial Crops – Once planted they will persist – Can be invasive Switchgrass Second Biomass Generation Biofuels Cellulose Enzymes Breakdown Cellulose CO2 Sugars CO2 Ethanol CO2 Fossil BTU 1.23 Fossil BTU 0.74 Fossil BTU @ 0.1 Gasoline Corn Ethanol Cellulosic Ethanol From Coal & Natural Gas From Petroleum Desirable Characteristics of Biofuel Plants • C 4 photosynthesis • Long canopy duration • Perennial • No known pests or diseases • Rapid growth in spring -(to outcompete weeds) • Sterility • High water-use efficiency • Partition nutrients belowground in the fall Two Potential Conflicts in the Nation’s
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Response of Lemna Gibba L. (Duckweed) to Copper and Nickel Phytoaccumulation Effet De L’Accumulation De Cu Et Ni Sur La Croissance De Lemna Gibba L
    NOVATECH 2010 Growth response of Lemna gibba L. (duckweed) to copper and nickel phytoaccumulation Effet de l’accumulation de Cu et Ni sur la croissance de Lemna gibba L. (lentilles d’eau) N. Khellaf, M. Zerdaoui Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Badji Mokhtar University, P.O. Box 12, 23000 Annaba, Algeria (E-mail: [email protected] (N. Khellaf); [email protected] (M. Zerdaoui)) RÉSUMÉ Pour déterminer la tolérance et la capacité de phytoaccumulation du cuivre (Cu) et du nickel (Ni) par une espèce de lentilles d’eau, Lemna gibba L., les plantes sont exposées à différentes concentrations de Cu et Ni (0,1 à 2,0 mg/L) dans une solution de Coïc et Lesaint dilué à 1/4. Le pH est maintenu constant à 6,0 (± 0,1) et le flux de lumière est de 12 h/jour. Le cuivre et le nickel sont tolérés par L. gibba à des concentrations ≤ 0,3 mg/L et ≤ 0,5 mg/L, respectivement. Cependant, la croissance des plantes diminue de 50% (I50) quand le milieu de culture contient 0,45 mg/L de Cu ou 0,75 mg/L de Ni. La plus faible concentration causant une inhibition complète (LCI) est de 0,5 et 1,0 mg/L respectivement en présence de Cu et Ni. Les résultats de l’analyse du métal dans les tissus des plantes révèlent une grande accumulation de Cu et une faible accumulation de Ni dans les tissus végétaux (pour la concentration ne causant aucune inhibition dans la croissance). Une diminution de la concentration de métal dans l’eau est également observée.
    [Show full text]
  • Botolph's Bridge, Hythe Redoubt, Hythe Ranges West And
    Folkestone and Hythe Birds Tetrad Guide: TR13 G (Botolph’s Bridge, Hythe Redoubt, Hythe Ranges West, and Nickolls Quarry) The tetrad TR13 G contains a number of major local hotspots, with Nickolls Quarry, the Botolph’s Bridge area and part of Hythe Ranges located within its boundaries. As a consequence the tetrad has the richest diversity of breeding birds in the local area, with 71 species having a status of at least possible in the latest BTO Atlas survey. It also had the highest total of species (125) in the winter Atlas survey. Sadly a major housing development is now in progress at the Nickolls Quarry site and much of the best habitat is now being disturbed or lost. Nickolls Quarry has been watched since the late 1940s, though early coverage was patchy, particularly in the 1960s and 1970s. As a working quarry the site has undergone significant changes during this time, expanding from two small pits to a much larger area of open water, some of which has since been backfilled. During 2001 to 2004 a series of shallow pools were created which proved particularly attractive to waders. Nickolls Quarry in 1952 Nickolls Quarry in 1998 Looking roughly northwards across the 'old pit' Looking south-west across the site towards the Hythe Roughs towards Dungeness Although a major housing development is underway on the site it still contains some interesting habitats. The lake is easily the largest area of open water in the local area and so remains one of the best areas for wildfowl, particularly during cold weather, for example in December 2010 when there were peak counts of 170 Wigeon, 107 Coot, 104 Pochard, 100 Teal, 53 Tufted Duck, 34 Gadwall, 18 Mute Swan, 12 Pintail, 10 Bewick’s Swan, 8 Shoveler, singles of Goldeneye and Goosander, and 300 White-fronted Geese flew over.
    [Show full text]