DOCSLIB.ORG

Overwinter Population Estimates of British Waterbirds Andrew J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overwinter Population Estimates of British Waterbirds Andrew J Overwinter population estimates of British waterbirds Andrew J. Musgrove, Graham E. Austin, Richard D. Hearn, Chas A. Holt, David A. Stroud and Simon R. Wotton Abstract In total, over 12.5 million waterbirds occur in Britain during the winter. Estimates of the numbers of non-breeding waterbirds visiting Britain are important for the birds’ conservation, both for status assessments and for the identification and designation of nationally and internationally important sites. This paper collates data from a wide range of sources, principally for the period 2004/05 to 2008/09, and produces estimates for 92 different species or populations, some using novel analytical methods developed by the authors. For 15 species or populations, formal estimates of wintering numbers are presented for the first time. The estimates demonstrate that species such as Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta , Gadwall Anas strepera and, especially, Little Egret Egretta garzetta have increased substantially in the last decade, while others, such as Greenland White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons flavirostris , Dunlin Calidris alpina and Common Pochard Aythya ferina , have declined markedly. Introduction breeding grounds as food availability dwin - Overwintering waterbirds constitute one of dles with the onset of winter, and a post- the most distinctive and significant elements breeding migration to Britain can involve a of the British avifauna. A very high propor - shorter journey than might otherwise be tion of many populations moves to Britain required. Second, despite the fact that for at least part of the non-breeding season, (outside protected areas) much of the British the numbers involved being especially countryside is seriously degraded and inhos - notable in comparison with the relatively pitable to wildlife, Britain does retain sub - small proportion (about 2.5%) of the land stantial areas of wetland habitats, in area of Europe that Britain occupies (Moser particular its estuaries, which are highly pro - 1987). Such concentrations of birds are due ductive in terms of invertebrate food, and to a number of factors. First, because of the newly created inland wetlands, such as influence of the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf flooded gravel-pits. Third, Britain’s geo - Stream, Britain’s overwinter temperatures graphic position places it along an important remain markedly higher than those of other migratory route (the East Atlantic Flyway) regions at a similar latitude. Species that between northern breeding grounds and breed at more northerly latitudes (west to important wintering areas farther south such Canada and Greenland and east to Scandi - as Iberia, Morocco and the Banc d’Arguin in navia and Arctic Russia), or to the east in Mauritania. Finally, there has been a general northern Europe and Russia, vacate their reduction in hunting pressure for many of 364 © British Birds 104 • July 2011 • 364 –397 Overwinter population estimates of British waterbirds g n i l p i T d i v a D 205. One of the most memorable of British winter birding experiences is surely the dawn flight of Pink-footed Geese Anser brachyrhynchus leaving their roost, in this case at Snettisham, Norfolk, December 2008. Pinkfeet numbers have increased steadily in recent years, the most recent estimate being 360,000 in autumn 2009. these populations, an increase in provision of and the Convention on Biological Diversity, nature reserves and the implementation of among others. In addition, as a member of other positive conservation policies, all of the European Union, the UK is bound by which help to create favourable wintering Directives 2009/147/EC and 92/43/EEC conditions (Tubbs 1977, 1991; Owen et al. (generally referred to as the Birds Directive 1986). and Habitats Directive, respectively). Among Despite these positive aspects, however, other requirements, these international Con - there are increasing causes for concern. Mon - ventions and European Directives oblige the itoring schemes such as the Wetland Bird UK to monitor its waterbirds and provide for Survey (WeBS) suggest that, following their conservation (for further details, see decades of generally increasing numbers of www.jncc.gov.uk/page-1359 ). waterbirds, many species are now declining, The monitoring of waterbirds in Britain is in some cases rapidly (Calbrade et al. 2010). typically undertaken by collating sample Conversely, numbers of other species con - counts to derive interannual population tinue to increase. In addition to the scientific trends, i.e. the relative numbers of a species desire to understand such changes, and a present in one year compared with the moral argument to reverse declines if they numbers in another. However, there are cases are due to human factors, there is also a legal where it is necessary to know not just relative requirement to investigate these changes in numbers, but population sizes as well. These population size and the factors underlying include the application of criteria supporting them. The UK is a signatory to the Conven - the Ramsar Convention; Criterion 6 says that tion on Wetlands of International Impor - a wetland is considered internationally tance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (better important if it regularly holds at least 1% of known as the Ramsar Convention), the Con - the individuals in a biogeographic population vention on the Conservation of Migratory of one species or subspecies of waterbird. Species of Wild Animals, the African- Knowledge of population size is also impor - Eurasian Migratory Waterbird Agreement, tant when assessing threat and extinction risk, British Birds 104 • July 2011 • 364 –397 365 Musgrove et al. in understanding resource use and interspe - numbers of waterbirds overwintering in cific competition, and in assessing the poten - Britain. Such assessments have previously tial effects of avian diseases. It should be been undertaken approximately once every noted that population estimates are required ten years, the most recent being those at both national and international levels; described by Kershaw & Cranswick (2003) waterbird monitoring data from Britain are for wildfowl and by Rehfisch et al. (2003) for thus passed on to the International Waterbird coastal waders. Both of those papers relied Census and so contribute to the regular largely on data from the period 1994/95 to Waterbird Population Estimates publications 1998/99. The aim of this paper is to update (e.g. Wetlands International 2006). these estimates (and the corresponding 1% Given the need to work with reasonably thresholds for determining site importance), up-to-date estimates, and given that many principally by making use of new data species are showing clear changes in recent but also by considering new analytical status in Britain, it is timely to reassess the approaches for particular species. Scope Geographic area This assessment covers Great Britain, including the offshore islands of England, Scotland and Wales (such as Shetland, Orkney, the Outer Hebrides, Anglesey, the Isles of Scilly and the Isle of Wight). However, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are omitted. Estimates of non-breeding waterbirds in Northern Ireland are traditionally considered alongside those in the Republic of Ireland; the latest all-Ireland estimates were published by Crowe et al. (2008). For birds making use of the sea, the estimates presented here attempt to stick broadly to birds visible from the r e l d shore, although for n a h a number of species, C notably Red-throated d r a h Diver Gavia stellata c i R and Common Scoter 206. Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa , Snettisham, Norfolk, April Melanitta nigra , concen - 2010. In the early part of the winter at least, over 95% of Black-tailed trations of birds located Godwits and almost all Bar-tailed Godwits in Britain occur on estuaries, by aerial survey farther so WeBS counts of these two species produce a clear and accurate offshore have also been picture of totals and trends. These show a substantial decline in wintering Bar-tails in recent years (the current estimate is 38,000); included as discussed moreover, the Bar-tailed to Black-tailed ratio has now fallen from in individual species 4:1 to less than 1:1 in a single decade. accounts. 366 British Birds 104 • July 2011 • 364 –397 Overwinter population estimates of British waterbirds Timescale and season clear demarcation between seasons, examina - Most data used in the analyses relate to tion of WeBS data suggests that, for a useful counts made in the five winters between estimate of the size of the wintering popula - 2004/05 and 2008/09 (although more recent tion, data for November to March only counts were available for several species). The should be considered for Little Stint C. overwinter period, for the purposes of the minuta , Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus , estimates presented in this paper, is defined as Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos , September to March for the majority of Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus and species. It should be noted that this differs Greenshank T. nebularia . Therefore, estimates from the period used for some previous esti - for these five waders have been calculated mates, for example Rehfisch et al. (2003), in based on the period November to March. which wader estimates were all based on data collected during November to March. Wader Species and populations covered counts for September and October were Previous papers presenting British popula - omitted from previous estimates owing to tion estimates of waterbirds have tended to concerns about passage birds inflating the focus on either wildfowl or waders, owing to winter numbers. However, among the more the manner in which monitoring has histori - numerous species, only Ringed Plover cally been organised in Britain. This paper Charadrius hiaticula and Sanderling Calidris represents the first occasion that new esti - alba show very pronounced peaks in numbers mates have been presented for both of these on passage compared with those during the main groups together, in addition to esti - winter, and these typically occur in August mates for divers (Gaviidae), grebes (Podici - and May (which are omitted from the pedidae), cormorants (Phalacrocoracidae), analyses here).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Migration Phenology of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes Minimus at an Irish Coastal Wetland
    Migration phenology of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus at an Irish coastal wetland Tom Cooney 42 All Saint’s Road, Raheny, Dublin D05 C627 Corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: Ireland, Jack Snipe, Lymnocryptes minimus , migration phenology Migration times of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus were monitored at North Bull Island in Dublin Bay during 2011/2012 to 2016/2017. Average arrival times in autumn centred on 2 October and average departure times in spring on 23 April. Although these results were site and habitat specific, they were similar to recent migration data for Ireland. While the time series examined for Ireland and Britain were of different lengths, migration times were extraordinarily similar. The average autumn arrival date for Ireland as a whole was 16 September while that for Britain was 23 September, and departure times in spring for Ireland centred on 30 April, one day later than in Britain. The close agreement suggests that migration times across both islands possibly occur synchronously. Other recently generated data for Ireland provides tantalising evidence that passage migration may take place and that Jack Snipe could be more frequent in upland areas than previously suspected. In both instances greater clarity will only be possible through increased observer effort and higher detection rates of this enigmatic species. Introduction Britain, but not in Ireland (Smiddy 2002). In winter, Jack Snipe appear to be widely but thinly distributed across much of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus are difficult to detect in Ireland with highest densities in counties along the west coast winter largely due to their solitary behaviour, nocturnal or (Balmer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Eds. 1965. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton Univ. Press. Pp. X Q- 922
    REVIEWS EDITED BY KENNETH C. PARKES The Quaternary of the United States.--H. E. Wright, Jr., and David G. Frey, eds.1965. Princeton,New Jersey,Princeton Univ. Press.Pp. x q- 922, illus., 11 in. $25.00.--Knowledgeis accumulatingvery rapidly in the generalarea of Pleistocene q- Recent (= Quaternary) biogeographyand evolutionary history. This exponential growth resultsfrom the rapid developmentof improvedmethods of dating orga.nic matter (radiocarbon,potassium argon, etc.), in pollen core analysis,in glacial and extra-glacial stratigraphy, in oceanography,and in other areas, as well as from acceleratedprosecution of classicalpaleontological and biogeographicanalyses. Con- sequently,review papers and symposiagrow out of date almost as rapidly as they are published. Resulting from the seventh and latest Congressof the International Association for QuaternaryResearch (INQUA), at Boulder,Colorado, in 1965,the presentmassive volume supersedesall of its predecessorsfor the area in question (which, despite the title, variously relatesto most of North America). Each review paper is complete in itself with its own bibliography; there are terminal indices to all. Emphasis is divided among Parts I-IV (Geology; Biogeography;Archaeology; Miscellaneous). While general background is always useful, Part II is obviously of the greatest immediate interest to ornithologists. It is divided among"Phytogeography and Palynology" (pollen analysis), "Zoogeog- raphy and Evolution," and a summarizing"Pleistocene Nonmarine Environments" (by E. S. Deevey, Jr.). Under the second sub-heading are chapters on mammals (by C. W. Hibbard and four other active authors), birds ("Avian Speciation in the Quaternary"; pp. 529-542, by Robert K. Selander), amphibians (by W. Frank Blair), reptiles (by Walter Auffenberg and William W.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 133 ) on the Yellow Wagtails, and Their
    ( 133 ) ON THE YELLOW WAGTAILS, AND THEIR POSITION IN THE BRITISH AVIFAUNA. BY N. F. TICEHURST, F.R.C.S., M.B.O.U. IN 1832 the late John Gould pointed out that the British Yellow Wagtail was a different species from that inhabiting the nearest parts of the continent and at the same time clearly showed that, while the continental bird was of rare occurrence in this country, our common species was almost equally rare on the continent.* The common Yellow Wagtail (Motacilla rail, Bonaparte) is a regular summer migrant to the British islands, which form its head-quarters throughout the breeding season. It arrives on our south coast during the last ten days of March, throughout April and during the first week of May, the males generally appearing a full fortnight before the females. Jts breeding range extends from the southern counties of England as far west as Somerset, northward to Inverness and Aberdeen, throughout which area it is generally distributed in suitable localities. In Devon and Cornwall it occurs chiefly as a spring and autumn migrant, though in the former county it breeds in limited numbers. In Wales it is local as a breeding species, while to the north of Scotland it can only be regarded as a rare visitor. It is said to have occurred in the Shetlands, and an adult male was obtained on Fair Isle, 8th May, 1906, and in Ireland it is extremely local, breeding in one or two localities only. In most parts of the continent it occurs only as a straggler during the periods of migration, but in France it is found in summer as a breeding species to the west of " Proc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015
    The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 Male Wheatear on the log pile 1 The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 espite coverage on the Common being rather poor again this year, a total of 96 species were D recorded, four more than in 2014. Of these, 45 bred or probably bred, with no doubt the highlight of the year being the successful breeding of a pair of Skylarks on the Plain, the first to do so since 2007. Much credit for this achievement must go to Wildlife & Conservation Officer, Peter Haldane, and his staff, who have persevered over the years to create a suitable and safe habitat for this Red-listed bird. Credit is also due to Chief Executive, Simon Lee, for his valuable cooperation, and indeed to the vast majority of the visiting public, many of whom have displayed a keen interest in the well-being of these iconic birds. Signage on the Plain this year was extended to the two uncut sections during the autumn and winter months, thus affording our migrants and winter-visiting birds a sanctuary in which to feed and shelter safely. Another outstanding high note this year was the Snow Bunting found on the Large Mound in January, a first for the Common since records began in 1974; and yet another first for the Common came in the form of three Whooper Swans at Rushmere in December. There was also a surprising influx of Lesser Spotted Woodpeckers during the spring, a bird that in the previous few years had become an extremely scarce visitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Pneumatization Patterns and Bursa of Fabricius in North American Shorebirds
    CRANIAL PNEUMATIZATION PATTERNS AND BURSA OF FABRICIUS IN NORTH AMERICAN SHOREBIRDS RAYIUOND MCNEIL AND JEAN BURTON study of age criteria in some species of North American shorebirds A brought us to consider two of the best known techniques of age deter- mination in birds, the size of the bursa of Fabricius and the degrees and pat- terns of skull pneumatization. The only attempt, known to us, to correlate bursa of Fabricius and gonadal development with the ossification of the skull is that of Davis (1947). The bursa of Fabricius is a lympho-epithelial organ lying dorsally above the cloaca. At least in some species it has an opening in the cloaca. It reaches its maximum size at 4-6 months and then begins involution (Davis, 1947). By cloaca1 examination of the bursal pouch, it is possible to distinguish juvenile from adult individuals of some taxa of birds especially Anseriformes and Galliformes (Gower, 1939; Hochbaum, 1942; Linduska, 1943; Kirkpatrick, 1944). Unfortunately, in shorebird species, the bursa of Fabricius has no cloaca1 opening and thus cannot be used as an age criterion of living birds. The pneumatization of the skull has been used as a criterion for estimating the age of birds by C. L. Brehm as far back as 1822 (Niethammer, 1968)) but it was not generally used until the turn of the century (Serventy et al., 1967). Miller (1946) describes the skull ossification process as follows: “The skull of a passerine bird when it leaves the nest is made of a single layer of bone in the area overlaying the brain; at least, the covering appears single when viewed mac- roscopically.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival Rates of Russian Woodcocks
    Proceedings of an International Symposium of the Wetlands International Woodcock and Snipe Specialist Group Survival rates of Russian Woodcocks Isabelle Bauthian, Museum national d’histoire naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d’oiseaux, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] Ivan Iljinsky, State University of St Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Sergei Fokin, State Informational-Analytical Center of Game Animals and Environment Group. Woodcock, Teterinsky Lane, 18, build. 8, 109004 Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Romain Julliard, Museum national d’histoire naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d’oiseaux, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] François Gossmann, Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage, 53 rue Russeil, 44 000 Nantes, France. E-mail: [email protected] Yves Ferrand, Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage, BP 20 - 78612 Le-Perray-en-Yvelines Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected] We analysed 324 recoveries from 2,817 Russian Woodcocks ringed as adult or yearling in two areas in Russia (Moscow and St Petersburg). We suspected that birds belonging to these two areas may experience different hunting pressure or climatic conditions, and thus exhibit different demographic parameters. To test this hypothesis, we analysed spatial and temporal distribution of recoveries, and performed a ringing-recovery analysis to estimate possible survival differences between these two areas. We used methods developed by Brownie et al. in 1985. We found differences in temporal variations of the age ratio between the two ringing areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Birds of Shetland by Hugh Harrop & Rob Fray
    Checklist of the Birds of Shetland by Hugh Harrop & Rob Fray This checklist covers the birds recorded in the county of Shetland up until 15 June 2008. Each species is categorised, depending on the criteria for its admission to the Shetland list. Species in category D or category E do not form part of the main list. The definitions of each category are: Category A = species which have been recorded in an apparently wild state at least once since 1 January 1958. Category B = species which were recorded in an apparently wild state at least once up to 31 December 1957. Category C = species which, although introduced by man, have now established a regular feral breeding stock which apparently maintains itself without necessary recourse to further introduction. There are currently only two species in this category on the Shetland list - Mandarin Aix galericulata and Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis. None have been introduced to or bred in Shetland, but breed widely on the British mainland. They are all vagrants to Shetland in a sense but have undoubtedly originated from British breeding stock. Category D = species which would otherwise appear in categories A, B or C except that: (D1) there is a reasonable doubt that they have ever occurred in a wild state; (D2) they have certainly arrived with a combination of ship and human assistance, including provision of food and shelter; (D3) they have only ever been found dead on the tideline; (D4) they would otherwise appear in category C, except that their feral populations may or may not be self-supporting.
    [Show full text]
  • Merlewood RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT PAPER No 84 A
    ISSN 0308-3675 MeRLEWOOD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PAPER No 84 A BIBLIOGRAPHICALLY-ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS OF SAETLAND by NOELLE HAMILTON Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Merlewood Research Station Grange-over-Sands Cumbria England LA11 6JU November 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1-4 ACKNOWLELZEMENTS 4 MAIN TEXT Introductory Note 5 Generic Index (Voous order) 7-8 Entries 9-102 BOOK SUPPUNT Preface 103 Book List 105-125 APPENDIX I : CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS OF SBETLAND Introductar y Note 127-128 Key Works : Books ; Periodicals 129-130 CHECKLI5T 131-142 List of Genera (Alphabetical) 143 APPENDICES 11 - X : 'STATUS' IJSTS Introductory Note 145 11 BREEDING .SPECIES ; mainly residem 146 111 BREEDING SPECIES ; regular migrants 147 N NON-BREEDING SPECIES ; regular migrants 148 V NON=BREEDING SPECIES ; nationally rare migrants 149-150 VI NON-BREEDING SPECIES ; locally rare migrants 151 VII NON-BREEDING SPECIES : rare migrants - ' escapes ' ? 152 VIII SPECIES RECORDED IN ERROR 153 I IX INTRDWCTIONS 154 X EXTINCTIONS 155 T1LBLE 157 INTRODUCTION In 1973, in view of the impending massive impact which the then developing North Sea oil industry was likely to have on the natural environment of the Northern Isles, the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology was commissioned iy the Nature Conservancy Council to carry out an ecological survey of Shetland. In order to be able to predict the long-term effects of the exploitation of this important and valuable natural resource it was essential to amass as much infarmation as passible about the biota of the area, hence the need far an intensive field survey. Subsequently, a comprehensive report incorporating the results of the Survey was produced in 21 parts; this dealt with all aspects of the research done in the year of the Survey and presented, also, the outline of a monitoring programme by the use of which it was hoped that any threat to the biota might be detected in time to enable remedial action to be initiated.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Print 02/02 February
    The non-breeding status of the Little Egret in Britain A. J. Musgrove Mike Langman ABSTRACT The Little Egret Egretta garzetta, formerly a rare vagrant in Britain, has undergone a remarkable range expansion following a large influx in 1989, and at the end of 1990 it was removed from the list of species considered by the British Birds Rarities Committee. Single-site counts in excess of 100 were made in autumn 1995, with the first site count of more than 200 in autumn 1998.The Little Egret was confirmed as a new British breeding bird in 1996, and by 1999 at least 30 breeding pairs were recorded at a total of nine sites. This paper documents the change in the species’ non-breeding status in Britain. Using data from the Wetland Bird Survey, with supplementary counts from roost surveys and county bird reports, it is estimated that more than 1,650 Little Egrets were present in September 1999, over 40% of these between Swanage Bay, Dorset, and Pagham Harbour,West Sussex. A further increase in the British population is expected.The increase in Britain has been mirrored in adjacent areas of northwest Europe. 62 © British Birds 95 • February 2002 • 62-80 Non-breeding status of Little Egret ormerly a rare vagrant in Britain, the Palearctic, very few were reported in the nine- Little Egret Egretta garzetta has undergone teenth century and in the first half of the twen- Fa remarkable range expansion in recent tieth century. In fact, certain well-watched years. Following a large influx into Britain in counties did not record the species until com- 1989, and continued high numbers during paratively recently, with first county records for 1990, the British Birds Rarities Committee took Sussex in 1952 (James 1996), Norfolk in 1952 the decision to remove the Little Egret from the (Taylor et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens, Science and Bird Conservation
    J Ornithol (2007) 148 (Suppl 1):S77–S124 DOI 10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9 REVIEW Citizens, science and bird conservation Jeremy J. D. Greenwood Received: 18 June 2007 / Revised: 26 September 2007 / Accepted: 27 September 2007 / Published online: 10 November 2007 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2007 Abstract Collaborative research by networks of amateurs of people in the research networks are important skills. has had a major role in ornithology and conservation Surveys must be organized in ways that take into account science and will continue to do so. It has been important the motives of the participants. It is useful to assess the in establishing the facts of migration, systematically skills of potential participants and, rather than rejecting recording distribution, providing insights into habitat those thought not to have adequate skills, to provide requirements and recording variation in numbers, produc- training. Special attention needs to be paid to ensuring that tivity and survival, thus allowing detailed demographic instructions are clear, that methods are standardized and analyses. The availability of these data has allowed con- that data are gathered in a form that is easily processed. servation work to be focussed on priority species, habitats Providing for the continuity of long-term projects is and sites and enabled refined monitoring and research essential. There are advantages to having just one organi- programmes aimed at providing the understanding neces- zation running most of the work in each country. Various sary for sound conservation management and for evidence- sorts of organizations are possible: societies governed by based government policy. The success of such work their (amateur) members but employing professional staff depends on the independence of the science from those to organize the work seem to be a particularly successful advocating particular policies in order to ensure that the model.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 8.0.5 - 12/19/2018 • 1112 Species • the ABA Checklist Is a Copyrighted Work Owned by American Birding Association, Inc
    Version 8.0.5 - 12/19/2018 • 1112 species • The ABA Checklist is a copyrighted work owned by American Birding Association, Inc. and cannot be reproduced without the express written permission of American Birding Association, Inc. • 93 Clinton St. Ste. ABA, PO BOX 744 Delaware City, DE 19706, USA • (800) 850-2473 / (719) 578-9703 • www.aba.org The comprehensive ABA Checklist, including detailed species accounts, and the pocket-sized ABA Trip List can be purchased from ABA Sales at http:// www.buteobooks.
    [Show full text]