Detection of Ionospheric Perturbations Associated with Japanese Earthquakes on the Basis of Reception of LF Transmitter Signals on the Satellite DEMETER
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 135–141, 2008 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/135/2008/ Natural Hazards © Author(s) 2008. This work is licensed and Earth under a Creative Commons License. System Sciences Detection of ionospheric perturbations associated with Japanese earthquakes on the basis of reception of LF transmitter signals on the satellite DEMETER F. Muto1, M. Yoshida1, T. Horie1, M. Hayakawa1, M. Parrot2, and O. A. Molchanov3 1Department of Electronic Engineering and Research Station on Seismo Electromagnetics, University of Electro-Communications, Chofu Tokyo, Japan 2LPCE/CNRS, Orleans, France 3Institute of Physics of the Earth, Moscow, Russia Received: 22 November 2007 – Revised: 22 January 2008 – Accepted: 22 January 2008 – Published: 26 February 2008 Abstract. There have been recently reported a lot of elec- 1 Introduction tromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes (EQs). Among these, the ground-based reception of subionospheric EQ precursory signature is recently known to appear not waves from VLF/LF transmitters, is recognized as a promis- only in the lithosphere, but also in the atmosphere and iono- ing tool to investigate the ionospheric perturbations associ- sphere (e.g., Hayakawa, 1999; Hayakawa and Molchanov, ated with EQs. This paper deals with the corresponding 2002). This means that EQs can excite atmospheric and whistler-mode signals in the upper ionosphere from those ionospheric perturbations by direct coupling, which leads VLF/LF transmitters, which is the counterpart of subiono- us to use a new terminology of “Lithosphere-Atmosphere- spheric signals. The whistler-mode VLF/LF transmitter sig- Ionosphere Coupling”. The ionosphere seems to be disturbed nals are detected on board the French satellite, DEME- in different height regions. For example, recent works by TER launched on 29 June 2004. We have chosen several Liu et al. (2000, 2006) have suggested in the statistical sense large Japanese EQs including the Miyagi-oki EQ (16 August that the ionospheric F layer is apparently disturbed during 2005; M=7.2, depth=36 km), and the target transmitter is a EQs. Also, we can cite a recent event study by Hobara and Japanese LF transmitter (JJY) whose transmitter frequency Parrot (2005). While, the lower ionosphere (D/E layer) is is 40 kHz. Due to large longitudinal separation of each satel- found already to be extremely sensitive to seismicity. This lite orbit (2500 km), we have to adopt a statistical analysis was confirmed by means of subionospheric VLF/LF prop- over a rather long period (such as 3 weeks or one month) to agation anomalies (Molchanov and Hayakawa, 1998) since have reliable data set. By analyzing the spatial distribution of the pioneering discovery of clear seismo-ionospheric pertur- JJY signal intensity (in the form of signal to noise ratio SNR) bations for the Kobe EQ (Hayakawa et al., 1996). Because during a period of 4 months including the Miyagi-oki EQ, we VLF/LF radio waves are known to propagate in the Earth- have found significant changes in the intensity; generally the ionosphere waveguide, any change in the lower ionosphere SNR is significantly depleted before the EQ, which is con- may result in significant changes in the VLF signal received sidered to be a precursory ionospheric signature of the EQ. at a station (Molchanov and Hayakawa, 1998; Molchanov This abnormal effect is reasonably explained in terms of ei- et al., 2001; Hayakawa, 2004; Hayakawa et al., 2004; Bi- ther (1) enhanced absorption of whistler-mode LF signals in agi et al., 2007). Recently, statistical analyses on the cor- the lower ionosphere due to the lowering of the lower iono- relation between the lower ionospheric perturbation as de- sphere, or (2) nonlinear wave-wave scattering. Finally, this tected by subionospheric VLF/LF signals and EQs, have analysis suggests an important role of satellite observation in been performed by Rozhnoi et al. (2004) and Maekawa et the study of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling. al. (2006), who have concluded that the lower ionosphere is definitely perturbed for the shallow EQs with magnitude greater than 6.0. Of course, it is not well understood at the moment how the ionosphere is perturbed due to the seismic- Correspondence to: M. Hayakawa ity, though there have been proposed a few possible mech- ([email protected]) anisms on the lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 136 F. Muto et al.: Satellite LF detection of seismo-ionospheric perturbations DEMETER 125 130 135 140 145 150 700 km depth km 45 0 20 40 60 80 100 45 Whistler mode Field Line 80 km Ionosphere Perturbation 40 8/16 8/24 JJY 8/30 VLF Radio Waves 8/7 7/23 6/19 35 Geographic Latitude [deg] VLF Transmitter 7/9 7/27 Epicenter VLF Receiver km Fig. 1. The model of VLF/LF wave propagation, in which there 30 30 are two modes of propagation: Earth-ionosphere waveguide mode M:over 5.5 0 500 and whistler mode in the ionospheric plasma. The mechanism of 125 130 135 140 145 150 Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling is plotted. Geographic Longitude [deg] Fig. 2. Relative location of the LF transmitter in Fukushima, JJY and the epicenters of the target EQs including Miyagi-oki EQ. The size of an EQ is proportional to its magnitude. (see Molchanov et al., 2001; Hayakawa, 2004; Sorokin et al., 2005; Molchanov and Hayakawa, 2008). 2 Analyzed EQs As is shown in Fig. 1, a VLF/LF transmitter emits elec- Figure 2 illustrates the relative location of our LF transmitter ◦ tromagnetic waves at a particular frequency mainly in the in Fukushima prefecture (geographic coordinates: 37 22’N, ◦ subionospheric waveguide, which are used to infer the 140 51’E), and the epicenters of our target EQs around seismo-ionospheric perturbations as mentioned above (e.g., Japan. The JJY transmission frequency is 40 kHz, and the Hayakawa et al., 1996; Molchanov and Hayakawa, 1998). transmitter power is 50 kW. These target EQs are summa- While, another part of VLF/LF transmitter signals is known rized in Table 1, in which we have chosen several EQs dur- to penetrate upward into the ionosphere/magnetosphere in ing a period from 1 June 2005 to 30 September 2005. The whistler mode (Hayakawa, 1995). This kind of whistler- selection criteria are as follows; (1) the magnitude of these mode VLF transmitter signal is also expected to provide EQs is greater than 5.5, and (2) the depth is less than 100 km. us with further information on the seismo-ionospheric per- Molchanov and Hayakawa (1998) indicated that only shal- turbation because of their penetration through this region. low EQs can influence the lower ionosphere, which is the In fact, Molchanov et al. (2006) have recently found sig- reason why we adopt the latter condition The former crite- nificant seismo-ionospheric effects associated with a huge rion has been recently confirmed by statistical analyses by Sumatra EQ in December, 2004 by using the VLF data ob- Rozhnoi et al. (2004) and Maekawa et al. (2006). As is seen served on board the French satellite, DEMETER. And, this in Table 1, we have a large EQ, named Miyagi-oki EQ hap- satellite finding is found to be in good consistence with our pened on 16 August 2005 with magnitude of 7.2 and with ground-based VLF observation for the same EQ by Horie depth of 36 km. This EQ will be the main target of our anal- et al. (2007a, b). This paper is a further extension of the ysis. paper by Molchanov et al. (2006), which deals with further event studies for Japanese EQs by using the same DEME- TER VLF/LF wave data. The satellite, DEMETER was 3 LF wave data on DEMETER and analysis methods launched on 29 June 2004, and it is working well with the aim of studying seismo-electromagnetic effects (Parrot et al., We follow the analysis method by Molchanov et al. (2006). 2006). In this paper we have chosen several large Japanese Following Molchanov et al. (2006), we compute the signal to EQs including the Miyagi-oki EQ (16 August 2005; M=7.2, noise ratio (SNR) that is defined as follows. depth=36 km), and the target transmitter is a Japanese LF transmitter (JJY) whose transmitter frequency is 40 kHz and 2A(f ) SNR = 0 . (1) which is located in Fukushima prefecture (Hayakawa, 2004). A(f−) + A(f+) Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 8, 135–141, 2008 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/8/135/2008/ F. Muto et al.: Satellite LF detection of seismo-ionospheric perturbations 137 Table 1. Details of the EQs selected. Data Lat. [deg] Long. [deg] Area Depth [km] M 2005.6.19 35.61 140.48 Chiba 48 5.7 2005.7.9 33.42 140.82 coast of southern Chiba 55 5.8 2005.7.23 35.50 139.98 Tokyo Bay 61 6.1 2005.7.27 33.26 142.32 coast of southeastern Chiba 33 5.5 2005.8.7 36.33 141.37 coast of Ibaraki 39 5.5 2005.8.16 38.28 142.04 coast of Miyagi 36 7.2 2005.8.24 38.56 142.99 coast of Miyagi 10 6.1 2005.8.30 38.48 143.18 coast of Miyagi 21 6.1 where A(f0) is the amplitude spectrum density in the 0.5 frequency band including the transmitter (JJY) frequency (40 kHz), and A(f±) are the background noise value out- 0.4 side the signal band. On the satellite DEMETER we ob- serve the electromagnetic waves (electric field) in two dif- 0.3 ferent frequency bands: VLF range (below 20 kHz) and higher frequency range (above 20 kHz).