Review of Species Affected by Cop16 Nomenclature Changes and Which Are Subject to EU Decisions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Review of species affected by CoP16 nomenclature changes and which are subject to EU decisions (Version edited for public release) Prepared for the European Commission Directorate General Environment Directorate E - Global & Regional Challenges, LIFE ENV.E.2. – Global Sustainability, Trade & Multilateral Agreements by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre November, 2013 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org PREPARED FOR The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment centre of the United Nations Environment DISCLAIMER Programme (UNEP), the world’s foremost The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect intergovernmental environmental organisation. the views or policies of UNEP, contributory The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, organisations or editors. The designations combining scientific research with practical policy employed and the presentations do not imply the advice. The Centre's mission is to evaluate and expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part highlight the many values of biodiversity and put of UNEP, the European Commission or authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the centre contributory organisations, editors or publishers of decision-making. Through the analysis and concerning the legal status of any country, territory, synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge the city area or its authorities, or concerning the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and timely delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The information for conventions, countries and mention of a commercial entity or product in this organisations to use in the development and publication does not imply endorsement by UNEP. implementation of their policies and decisions. UNEP-WCMC provides objective and scientifically © Copyright: 2013, European Commission rigorous procedures and services. These include ecosystem assessments, support for the implementation of environmental agreements, global and regional biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and the development of future scenarios. CITATION UNEP-WCMC. 2013. Review of species affected by CoP16 nomenclature changes and which are subject to EU decisions . UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. Table of Contents Introduction to the species sheets ......................................................................................................... 4 SPECIES: Trioceros sternfeldi ......................................................................................................... 5 SPECIES: Phelsuma dorsivittata .................................................................................................... 9 SPECIES: Phelsuma parva ............................................................................................................ 13 SPECIES: Candoia paulsoni ......................................................................................................... 17 SPECIES: Gopherus morafkai ....................................................................................................... 23 Annex I: Key to purpose and source codes ....................................................................................... 30 Introduction Introduction to the species sheets The changes in nomenclature that result from the adoption of new Standard Nomenclature references at CITES CoP16 (Resolution Conf. 12.11 Rev. CoP16) have affected a number of taxa subject to current EU decisions and in some instances further scrutiny was considered to be required to ensure that the relevance of the original decisions is maintained. This report presents reviews of the conservation status and trade of those of cases where further analysis of the species status was found to be needed. On the basis of the Overview of the impact of CITES CoP16 nomenclature changes on current EU decisions (SRG 65), five taxa were selected for more in-depth review: - Trioceros sternfeldi from United Republic of Tanzania; - Phelsuma dorsivittata from Madagascar; - Phelsuma parva from Madagascar; - Candoia paulsoni from Indonesia and Solomon Islands; and - Gopherus morafkai from Mexico and United States of America. In most cases, CITES trade data was not available for the taxa recognised post-CoP16 and data represents the status pre-CoP16. Trioceros sternfeldi REVIEW OF SPECIES AFFECTED BY COP16 NOMENCLATURE CHANGES AND WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO EU OPINIONS REPTILIA CHAMAELEONIDAE SPECIES: Trioceros sternfeldi SYNONYMS: Chamaeleo sternfeldi, Chamaeleon bitaeniatus graueri, Chamaeleon bitaeniatus rudis, Chamaelen bitaeniatus tornieri, Chamaeleon burgeoni, Chamaeleo [n] rudis, Chamaeleo rudis sternfeldi RANGE STATES: United Republic of Tanzania RANGE STATE UNDER REVIEW: United Republic of Tanzania IUCN RED LIST: Not evaluated PREVIOUS EC OPINIONS: All opinions originally formed for Chamaeleo rudis , from which Trioceros sternfeldi was split following CoP16. Current positive opinion for all wild-sourced specimens from the United Republic of Tanzania first applied on 23/06/1999 and last confirmed on 14/09/2010. TRADE PATTERNS: United Republic of Tanzania: Tanzania has published a CITES export quota for wild-sourced Trioceros rudis sensu lato every year from 1997 onwards, and for F1 specimens every year from 2003 onwards, with the exception of 2010 when a quota for captive-bred specimens was published (Table 1). Given that T. rudis sensu stricto is not known to occur in Tanzania, it is likely that all trade reported as T. rudis originating in Tanzania is in the species T. sternfeldi . The quota for wild-sourced specimens was exceeded according to data reported by Tanzania in 2003, and according to data reported by importers in every year 2003-2009. Trade remained within the quotas for source ‘F’ and ‘C’ specimens in every year 2003-2011. Tanzania specified that its CITES annual report for the year 2003 was compiled on the basis of actual trade. Tanzania’s CITES annual reports for 2007 and 2012 have not yet been received; trade data for 2013 are not yet available. Table 1. CITES export quotas for Trioceros rudis from the United Republic of Tanzania and global direct exports, as reported by the importers and exporter, 2003-2013. All trade was in live specimens; no trade in captive-bred specimens was reported in 2010 (trade to which no quota applies in any given year is greyed out). The United Republic of Tanzania’s CITES annual reports for 2007 and 2012 have not yet been received; trade data for 2013 are not yet available. Source 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 W Quota (wild-taken) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000§ 1000§ Importer 2182 1474 1312 1944 3440 2595 1428 821 743 Exporter 1110 657 940 972 877 1000 966 516 F Quota (F1 specimens) 353 310 240 264 238 244 321 321 ♦ 321 350 178 Importer 92 192 145 51 105 150 85 60 Exporter 186 40 197 47 80 68 30 Key: § = applies to live specimens only; ♦ = applies to live, captive-bred specimens Trioceros sternfeldi Direct trade from Tanzania reported as T. rudis 2003-2012 consisted exclusively of live specimens, the majority wild-sourced and traded for commercial purposes (Table 2). Notable quantities of source ‘F’ specimens were also traded, while small quantities of captive-bred and ranched specimens were reported in trade by importers only in 2004 and 2006, respectively. Importers also reported small numbers of seized/confiscated live specimens in 2003-2004. Trade reported by importers exceeded trade reported by Tanzania in every year 2003-2011, with the exception of 2010. According to importer-reported data, trade peaked in 2007 and subsequently declined in every year. Imports to the EU-28 from all sources accounted for 37 per cent of total global direct imports from Tanzania reported as T. rudis over the period 2003-2011, according to importer-reported data. Trade data by EU Member State is available here: https://db.tt/0cd8m7Ur . Indirect exports originating in Tanzania to the EU-28 reported as T. rudis consisted of six live, wild- sourced specimens re-exported via Canada in 2003 for commercial purposes, reported by Canada only. Table 2. Direct exports reported as Trioceros rudis from the United Republic of Tanzania to the EU-28 (EU) and the rest of the world (RoW), 2003-2011. All trade was in live specimens. The United Republic of Tanzania’s CITES annual reports for 2007 and 2012 have not yet been received; no trade was reported in 2012. Importer Source Purpose Reported by 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total ECMember W B Importer 20 20 Exporter T Importer 769 695 569 499 1016 781 426 442 312 5509 Exporter 467 308 322 309 462 351 412 182 2813 Z Importer Exporter 20 20 F T Importer 92 192 140 45 40 100 60 40 709 Exporter 111 40 176 11 30 48 416 I - Importer 31 59 90 Exporter RoW W B Importer 11 11 Exporter T Importer 1413 779 732 1425 2424 1780 1002 379 431 10365 Exporter 643 349 618 663 415 649 534 334 4205 Z Importer 34 34 Exporter F T Importer 5 6 65 50 25 20 171 Exporter 75 21 36 50 20 30 232 C B Importer 14 14 Exporter R T Importer 50 50 Exporter Subtotals W Importer 2182 1474 1312 1944 3440 2595 1428 821 743 15939 Exporter 1110 657 940 972 877 1000 966 516 7038 F Importer 92 192 145 51 105 150 85 60 880 Exporter 186 40 197 47 80 68 30 648 C Importer 14 14