Thermal Maturity Modeling of Organic-Rich Mudrocks in The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THERMAL MATURITY MODELING OF ORGANIC-RICH MUDROCKS IN THE DELAWARE BASIN USING RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY OF CARBONACEOUS MATERIAL A Thesis by TELEMACHOS ANDREW MANOS Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Nicholas Perez Committee Members, Franco Marcantonio Brent Miller Head of Department, Michael Pope August 2018 Major Subject: Geology Copyright 2018 Telemachos A. Manos ABSTRACT Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous material (RSCM) is an emerging tool to investigate the peak temperature organic-rich sediments experience during burial and exhumation. Previously, peak temperature and maturity have been commonly determined using vitrinite reflectance (%Ro), but results may be affected by user bias, organic material composition, hydrogen-index, and pressure suppression. Thermal maturity of organic material is an important factor in determining source rock viability, and RSCM presents an alternative technique to constrain peak temperatures that is not affected by issues that may alter %Ro results. This study investigated the viability of RSCM thermometry against %Ro and pyrolysis on well cuttings retrieved from Permian through Ordovician intervals of the Delaware Basin in West Texas, assessing peak temperatures and paleogeothermal gradients. New RSCM results from this study demonstrate that the western portion of the basin experienced higher peak temperatures than equivalent depths in the eastern portion of the basin by up to 100oC, which is consistent with existing vitrinite reflectance measurements. This study also reconstructs the paleogeothermal gradient profile of the basin center by incorporating 11 wells in Reeves and Loving County, including wells which have intersected igneous intrusions. Geothermal gradients at times of peak temperature are 40-45oC/km in the east and up to 72.5oC/km in the west. Higher geothermal gradients in the west correspond to areas with poor agreement between RSCM and vitrinite reflectance. Reconciling the differences between methods requires elevated heat flow, which may ii have been supplied by mid-Cenozoic intrusions and regional heat flow associated with the Rio Grande Rift. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair Dr. Nicholas Perez, for his continued guidance and mentorship throughout my graduate work at Texas A&M University. His high standards and ambitious drive modeled my expectations of a young professional at Texas A&M University, helping me consistently push my limits as a researcher and critical thinker. I would also like to thank the faculty at Texas A&M who contributed discussion to the topic, Dr. Jim Markello, Dr. Mike Pope, and Dr. Brent Miller; the staff at the Texas Oil and Gas Institute, Dr. Brian Casey and Dr. David DeFelice; and the basin modelers at the Chevron Center of Research Excellence, Dr. Mauro Becker, Dr. Irene Arango, Dr. Tess Minotti, Dr. Barry Katz, Dr. Andrea Romero, and Dr. Norellis Rodriguez. Finally, thanks to the fellow graduate students in Dr. Perez’s research group who helped spearhead a new research team, specifically Vicky Gao, Clyde Findlay, and Maria Pesek. Their encouragement and assistance greatly aided in overcoming the many obstacles that comes with venturing into new territory. iv CONTRIBUTORS AND FUNDING SOURCES Contributors This work was supported by a defense committee consisting of Dr.Nicholas Perez, Dr. Brent Miller of the Department of Geology & Geophysics and Professor Franco Marcantonio of the Department of Oceanography and Department of Geology. The Raman Spectrometer, training, and decomposition software used for peak- temperature analysis was constructed and written by Professor Emmanuel Soignard at the Arizona State University Leeroy Eyring Center for Solid State Science. Thin sections were generated at National Petrographic Laboratory. %Ro and Pyrolysis Rock-Eval was contracted through Geomark Research Ltd. Maps of gas-oil ratios were constructed with assistance from a fellow graduate student Vicky Gao, and well correlations were completed with assistance from Dr. Brian Casey at the Texas Oil and Gas Institute and Nate Naylor at Texas A&M University. All other work conducted for this thesis was completed by the student independently. Funding Sources This work was supported by a Graduate Student Research Grant from the Geological Society of America, Grands-in-Aid funding from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, a scholarship from the Permian Basin Area Foundation, a scholarship from the West Texas Geological Society, a scholarship from the US Army Reserves, startup funding from Dr. Nicholas Perez, and a fellowship from the Berg- Hughes center for Petroleum and Sedimentary Systems. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………… ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………… iv CONTRIBUTORS AND FUNDING SOURCES…………………………………… v TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………… vi LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………… viii LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………….. x 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………. 1 1.1 Current Thermal Maturity Indicators…………………………………… 4 1.2 Raman Spectroscopy of Carbonaceous Material as an Emerging Method.............................................................................................. 5 1.3 Limitations of RSCM……………………………………………………. 9 2. BACKGROUND GEOLOGY…………………………………………………… 12 2.1 Delaware Basin………………………………………………………….. 12 2.2 Stratigraphy………………………………………………………………. 12 2.3 Exhumation History……………………………………………………… 15 2.4 Thermal Characteristics………………………………………............... 15 2.5 Igneous Intrusions in the Delaware Basin…………………………….. 17 3. METHODS………………………………………………………………………… 22 3.1 Raman Spectroscopy of Carbonaceous Material (RSCM)………… 22 3.2 Collection Regime……………………………………………………… 24 3.3 Peak Fitting and Data Decomposition……………………………….. 25 3.4 Sampling Regime……………………………………………………… 27 3.5 Data Plotting……………………………………………………………. 29 3.6 Vitrinite Reflectance……………………………………………………. 31 3.7 Rock-Eval Pyrolysis……………………………………………………. 31 4. RESULTS……….………………………………………………………………… 33 4.1 Calibration Wells………………………………………………………… 33 4.2 RSCM and Vitrinite Reflectance Compatibility……………...………. 33 4.3 Vitrinite Reflectance Interpolation…………………………………….. 36 vi 4.4 Rock-Eval Pyrolysis…………………………………………………….. 37 4.5 RSCM Data Points……………………………………………………… 38 4.6 RSCM Uncertainty……………………………………………………… 41 4.7 RSCM Surfaces…………………………………………………………. 42 5. DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………… 44 5.1 RSCM Peak Temperatures Contrasted with %Ro Temperature Estimates………………………………………………………………… 44 5.2 Comparison with Pyrolysis Rock-Eval………………………………… 45 5.3 Trends in Peak Temperature…………………………………………… 46 5.4 Comparison of Trends between RSCM and %Ro…………………… 48 6. BASIN MODELING……………………………………………………………….. 52 6.1 Introduction to Basin Modeling…………………………………………. 52 6.2 Model Inputs……………………………………………………………… 53 6.3 Cold Case – Lineberry Evelyn #1……………………………………… 54 6.4 Hot Case – Texaco #1-29………………………………………………. 53 6.5 Rifting Style………………………………………………………………. 59 6.6 Igneous Intrusions………………………………………………………. 61 6.7 Additional Sources of Heat…………………………………………….. 65 6.8 Cretaceous Overburden Removal…………………………………….. 66 6.9 Peak Temperatures over Time………………………………………… 68 7. CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………….. 72 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………….. 75 APPENDIX…………………..………………………………………………………... 98 vii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE Page 1. Gas oil ratios from lateral production of the Wolfcamp formation in the Delaware Basin of West Texas…………………………………………………… 3 2. Cartoon illustrating virtual energy states of molecules when elevated by photon absorption………………………………………………………………….. 6 3. Illustration detailing the transformation of amorphous carbon to ordered graphene sheets with increasing temperature………………………………….. 7 4. Map showing the Delaware basin location and stratigraphy, with well location and study area indicated………………………………………………… 14 5. Events illustrating the link between change in magmatic composition and regional tectonics…………………………………………………………………... 19 6. Map showing the location of known igneous intrusions in the Delaware Basin region………………………………………………………………………… 20 7. Thin section plain polarized light view showing opaque macerals illuminated in a carbonate matrix, with the laser focus position in red…………………….. 24 8. The raw Raman spectra are initially corrected for background fluorescence by subtracting a linear function connecting the lowest points at 1100cm-1 and 1800cm-1……………………………………………………………………….. 26 9. Peak-fitted Raman spectra showing evolving peak parameters with increasing depth and temperature……………………………………………….. 28 10. Worksheet showing individual peak-temperature measurements from Woodford sediments in Tenney Gerald E. #1 well at 1840m TVDSS………... 30 11. Depth/temperature profiles and 1σ errors for each well analyzed with RSCM……………………………………………………………………………….. 34 12. RSCM temperatures as determined from eq. 1 and eq. 2 diverge for measured samples of less than 150oC…………………………………………... 35 13. Maps of interpolated vitrinite reflectance values, showing depth to 0.8% maturity (left) and the vitrinite gradient from 0.8-2.8% (right)…………………. 37 14. Maps showing the depth to RSCM values of 120oC (left) and the peak temperature paleogeothermal gradient (right)…………………………………... 42 viii 15. Plot of %Ro measured vs. RSCM %Ro equivalence…………………………… 45 16. %Ro, Pyrolysis, and RSCM results (converted to %Ro) plotted against depth from the Tenney, Gerald E. #1 well……………………………………………… 47 17.