DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Report BLOOMINGTON INDUSTRIAL FACILITY DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH No. 2016031085 Lead Agency: San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department Consultant: December 2016 BLOOMINGTON INDUSTRIAL FACILITY Draft ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH No. 2016031085 Lead Agency San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0187 Contact: Kevin White Consultant: Michael Baker International 3536 Concours, Suite 100 Ontario, California 91764 Contact: Christine Jacobs-Donoghue December 2016 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1.0-1 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................ 1.0-1 PROJECT UNDER REVIEW .................................................................................................... 1.0-2 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY .................................................................................................... 1.0-3 UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ................................................................................... 1.0-4 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT ........................................................................................... 1.0-5 2 INTRODUCTION PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................................................................................... 2.0-1 EIR SCOPE, ISSUES, AND CONCERNS ..................................................................................... 2.0-2 SCOPING MEETING ........................................................................................................... 2.0-3 SCOPING RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 2.0-3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS ...................................................................................... 2.0-5 REPORT ORGANIZATION ..................................................................................................... 2.0-6 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE ........................................................................................... 2.0-8 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION, SETTINGS, AND SURROUNDING LAND USES ................................................ 3.0-1 SURROUNDING LAND USES ................................................................................................. 3.0-9 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING ................................................................................. 3.0-9 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 3.0-13 PROPOSED PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 3.0-13 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 3.0-14 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS AND APPROVALS .......................................................................... 3.0-21 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 4.0-1 4.1 AIR QUALITY................................................................................................ 4.1-1 4.2 CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................. 4.2-1 4.3 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ........................................................................ 4.3-1 4.4 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................... 4.4-1 4.5 LAND USE ................................................................................................... 4.5-1 4.6 NOISE......................................................................................................... 4.6-1 San Bernardino County December 2016 i Bloomington Industrial Facility Table of Contents Draft EIR 4.7 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION .............................................................. 4.7-1 5 OTHER CEQA REQUIRED TOPICS CEQA REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................... 5.0-1 SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS ............................................................................. 5.0-1 SIGNIFICANT AND IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES .................................................... 5.0-2 LONG-TERM COMMITMENT OF LAND AND RESOURCES ............................................................ 5.0-2 ENERGY CONSUMPTION ..................................................................................................... 5.0-3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................................................. 5.0-3 REGULATORY SETTING ........................................................................................................ 5.0-7 STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE .............................................................................................. 5.0-8 PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION .................................................................................... 5.0-9 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 5.0-9 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ..................................................................................................... 5.0-13 6 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT AESTHETICS ................................................................................................................. 6.0-1 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES............................................................................. 6.0-4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................... 6.0-5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ........................................................................................................... 6.0-9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ...................................................................................... 6.0-11 MINERAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................................... 6.0-15 NOISE ............................................................................................................... 6.0-16 POPULATION AND HOUSING ............................................................................................... 6.0-17 PUBLIC SERVICES .............................................................................................................. 6.0-18 RECREATION ............................................................................................................... 6.0-19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ........................................................................................ 6.0-20 7 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS ............................................................................................... 7.0-1 REMOVAL OF A BARRIER TO GROWTH .................................................................................... 7.0-2 ECONOMIC GROWTH .......................................................................................................... 7.0-3 POPULATION GROWTH ........................................................................................................ 7.0-3 ESTABLISHMENT OF A PRECEDENT SETTING ACTION .................................................................. 7.0-3 San Bernardino County December 2016 ii Bloomington Industrial Facility Table of Contents Draft EIR ENCROACHMENT ON OPEN SPACE ......................................................................................... 7.0-4 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 7.0-4 8 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 8.0-1 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ............................................................................ 8.0-2 ALTERNATIVE 1: “NO PROJECT” ALTERNATIVE ....................................................................... 8.0-5 ALTERNATIVE 2: “REDUCED DENSITY” ALTERNATIVE ............................................................... 8.0-8 ALTERNATIVE 3: “COMMERCIAL USE” ALTERNATIVE ............................................................. 8.0-11 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED ......................................................................... 8.0-14 ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE ........................................................................ 8.0-15 9 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 9.0-1 10 PREPARERS AND PERSON’S CONSULTED ............................................................. 10.0-1 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.0-1: COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................... 1.0-5 TABLE 1.0-2: PROJECT OBJECTIVES CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS ..................................................... 1.0-6 TABLE 1.0-3: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SUMMARY ................................................................ 1.0-9 TABLE 2.0-1: CEQA REQUIRED SECTIONS AND LOCATION IN DRAFT EIR .................................... 2.0-7 TABLE 3.0‐1: PROJECT ASSESSOR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Chloe Sutkowski Pellissier Ranch Remote Sensing Investigation Abstract Pellissier Ranch in Riverside, CA Is a Potential Restin
    Chloe Sutkowski Pellissier Ranch Remote Sensing Investigation Abstract Pellissier Ranch in Riverside, CA is a potential resting place of artifacts from the Inland Empire’s first settlement, La Placita de Los Trujillos. The Great Flood of the Santa Ana River in 1862 washed away the entire settlement in a single night. Geophysical surveys are being employed at the site to non-invasively search the subsurface for buried artifacts. As Pellissier Ranch covers an immense area, remote sensing will be employed to narrow the search area to locations that would be likely deposit locations from the overwhelmed river. Digital Elevation Models were acquired from the USGS and used to derive raster datasets of slope, contour lines, flow direction, and flow accumulation. From the combined analysis of the three datasets, it is likely that the northeast portion of the site experienced the least force from the overwhelmed Santa Ana River and is best to prioritize in the search for buried artifacts. Introduction Pellissier Ranch is currently a vacant lot covered in tall grasses year-round. The northern half is in San Bernardino County, and the southern half in Riverside County. The most recent owner had been Antoine Pellissier, who purchased the land in 1905 and developed it as a vineyard. Shortly after, the dry laws came into effect and it ruined Pellissier’s business, forcing him to abandon the land as it has remained until present day. Before it came into his possession, it belonged to the Inland Empire’s first settlers and was known as La Placita de Los Trujillos (La Placita).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Northside Specific Plan Baseline Opportunities & Constraints Analysis
    Appendix B Northside Specific Plan Baseline Opportunities & Constraints Analysis NORTHSIDE BASELINE OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Prepared For: City of Riverside Planning Division 3900 Main Street Riverside, California 92522 Prepared By: RICK – Community Planning & Sustainable Development 5620 Friars Road San Diego, California 92110 In Association With: Design Workshop 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 - DUDEK 3544 University Avenue Riverside, California 92501 - Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 555 West Beech Street, Suite 460 San Diego, California 92101 Northside Specific Plan Baseline Report Memorandum Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... i Baseline Report Study Area ....................................................................................................................... i Section 1: Land Use ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Constraints .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Opportunities .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Initial Study RIVERSIDE WARD: 1 COLTON DISTRICT: 6 1
    COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION Draft Initial Study RIVERSIDE WARD: 1 COLTON DISTRICT: 6 1. Case Number: Zoning Code Amendment (AMD) P19-0063; General Plan Amendment (GP) P19-0064; Specific Plan (SP) P19-0065; and Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) P19-0066 2. Project Title: Northside Neighborhood & Pellissier Ranch Inter-Jurisdictional Specific Plan and Program Environmental Impact Report (Northside Specific Plan) 3. Hearing Date: To be determined; Winter 2020 (estimated). 4. Lead Agency: City of Riverside Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 3900 Main Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92522 5. Contact Person: Jay Eastman Phone Number: (951) 826-5264 6. Project Location: The 1,700-acre Northside Specific Plan Area (SPA) is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Riverside, the City of Colton, and the County of Riverside. The SPA is generally east of Santa Ana River, south of the La Loma Hills, north of Fairmont Park, and west of the BNSF railroad line. State Route (SR-60) and Interstate 215 (I-215) bisect the site. See Figures 1 and 2. 7. Project Applicant/Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: City of Riverside 3900 Main Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92522 (951) 826-5264 [email protected] 8. General Plan Designation: Industrial, Office, Business/Office Park, Commercial, Medium Density Residential, Medium-High Density Residential, Semi-rural Residential, Public Park, Private Recreation, Open Space/Natural Resources, Public Facilities/Institutional, and Downtown Specific Plan (City of Riverside); Very Low Density Residential, Light Industrial, and “Planning Focus Area” which encourages low density residential (City of Colton); and Medium Density Residential, Light Industrial, and Commercial Retail (County of Riverside).
    [Show full text]
  • Northside Neighborhood & Pellissier Ranch SPECIFIC PLAN
    Northside Neighborhood & Pellissier Ranch SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT MARCH 26, 2020 Northside Neighborhood & Pellissier Ranch SPECIFIC PLAN DRAFT MARCH 26, 2020 PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: IN ASSOCIATION WITH: Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Northside Storyline ............................................................................................... 2 1.2 Specific Plan Area ................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Property Ownership .............................................................................................. 3 1.4 Area History ......................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................... 5 1.6 The Planning Process ............................................................................................ 5 1.7 Planning Initiatives ............................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 Vision, Principles, & Key Plan Elements ................................................. 10 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Vision ................................................................................................................ 11
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Ashley Way Logistics Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Colton, San Bernardino County, California
    DRAFT Ashley Way Logistics Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Colton, San Bernardino County, California Prepared for: City of Colton Development Services 659 North La Cadena Drive Colton, CA 92324 Contact: Steve Gonzalez, Associate Planner Prepared by: FirstCarbon Solutions 650 E. Hospitality Lane, Suite 125 San Bernardino, CA 92408 925.357.2562 Contact: Frank Coyle, Project Director Charles Holcombe, Senior Project Manager Vanessa Welsh, Project Manager Report Date: March 22, 2019 NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | AFRICA | AUSTRALIA | ASIA WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City of Colton—Ashley Way Logistics Center Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table of Contents Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................ vii Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 - Purpose.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 - Project Location ................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 - Environmental Setting ....................................................................................................... 1 1.4 - Project Description ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Santa Ana River Integrated Model Summary Report Part 1 of 5
    Upper Santa Ana River Integrated Model Summary Report Part 1 of 5: Text DRAFT Prepared For: San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District April 29, 2020 GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. | P (909) 451‐6650 | F (909) 451‐6638 620 Arrow Highway, Suite 2000, La Verne, CA 91750 | Mailing: P.O. Box 220, Claremont, CA 91711 www.gssiwater.com Upper Santa Ana River Integrated Model - Summary Report DRAFT 29-Apr-20 THIS REPORT IS RENDERED TO SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, SOLELY FOR THEIR BENEFIT IN CONNECTION WITH ITS STATED PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE RELIED ON BY ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY OR BY THEM IN ANY OTHER CONTEXT. AS DATA IS UPDATED FROM TIME TO TIME, ANY RELIANCE ON THIS REPORT AT A FUTURE DATE SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT UPDATED DATA. THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN CHECKED FOR COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, AND CONSISTENCY BY THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONALS: ___________________________________ David Barnes, M.Eng. Senior Modeler ___________________________________ Johnson Yeh, Ph.D., PG, CHG Principal CHG No. 422 ___________________________________ Dennis E. Williams, Ph.D., PG, CHG President CHG No. 139 Copyright © 2020 GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. GEOSCIENCE retains its copyrights, and the client for which this document was produced may not use such products of consulting services for purposes unrelated to the subject matter of this project. No portion of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise EXCEPT for purposes of the project for which this document was produced. i Upper Santa Ana River Integrated Model - Summary Report DRAFT 29-Apr-20 UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER INTEGRATED MODEL SUMMARY REPORT CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Division NOTICE of PREPARATION of DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) NORTHSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN (P19-0065) for the CITY of RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
    2019039168 COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT D(llYQI DEPARTMENT R!VER,SIDE Planning Division NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) NORTHSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN (P19-0065) FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TO: See Distribution List FROM LEAD AGENCY: City of Riverside Community & Economic Development Dept. Planning Division Jay Eastman, AICP - Principal Planner 3900 Main Street, 3rd floor Riverside, California 92522 DATE: March 29, 2019 SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Report (EIR) The City of Riverside will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project identified below. The City needs to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information that is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our Agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, location and the potential environmental effects of the project are identified below. Maps illustrating the project location and proposed uses are attached. Note that additional materials are available at the City of Riverside office (see Lead Agency address above), including the distribution list, detailed project description, Initial Study, and the Northside Specific Plan Baseline Opportunities & Constraints Analysis (dated August 2017). These materials are also available online at: http://northsideplan.com/ Due to time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date, but no later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. An agency scoping meeting has been scheduled for April 17, 2019, at 6:00 PM, in the Springbrook Clubhouse at 1011 Orange Street, Riverside, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Phase I Archaeological Inventory Report
    APPENDIX C Extended Phase I Archaeological Inventory Report ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY REPORT FOR THE CITY OF COLTON MODERN PACIFIC 88-DU RESIDENTIAL PROJECT CITY OF COLTON, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: CITY OF COLTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Mr. Jay Jarrin, Senior Planner 659 North La Cadena Drive Colton, California 92324 PREPARED BY: Linda Kry, BA, Erica Nicolay, MA, Brad Comeau, MSc, RPA, and Micah Hale, PhD, RPA DUDEK 38 North Marengo Avenue Pasadena, California 91101 MARCH 2019 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY REPORT FOR THE CITY OF COLTON MODERN PACIFIC 88-DU RESIDENTIAL PROJECT NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATION Authors: Linda Kry, BA, Erica Nicolay, MA, Brad Comeau, MSc, RPA, and Micah Hale, PhD, RPA Firm: Dudek Project Proponent: City of Colton Report Date: March 2019 Report Title: Archaeological Inventory Report for the City of Colton Modern Pacific 88-DU Residential Project, City of Colton, San Bernardino County, California Type of Study: Pedestrian Survey, Extended Phase I Survey New Resources: N/A Updated Sites: N/A USGS Quads: San Bernardino 7.5’ T1S and T2S/R4W and R5W Sections 1, 5-7, 25, 29-32, and 36 Acreage: Approximately 49 acres Permit Numbers: N/A Keywords: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); City of Colton; cultural resources inventory, pedestrian survey; Extended Phase I Survey 10728 III DUDEK MARCH 2019 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY REPORT FOR THE CITY OF COLTON MODERN PACIFIC 88-DU RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 10728 IV DUDEK MARCH 2019 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY REPORT FOR THE CITY OF COLTON MODERN PACIFIC 88-DU RESIDENTIAL PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dudek was retained by the City of Colton (City) to complete a Phase I pedestrian survey and Extended Phase I study for the proposed Modern Pacific 88-DU Residential Project (proposed Project) located in the City of Colton, San Bernardino County, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessor's Office
    San Bernardino County Assessor 172 West Third Street, 5th Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 (877)-855-7654 Important Dates for Taxpayers* • Jan 1 Lien Date — Taxes Attach As Lien on Property • Feb 1 Second Installment due — Secured Property Tax Bill • Feb 15 Last Day to file exemptions in a timely manner • April 1 Business Property And Vessel Property Statement Due • April 10 Last Day to Pay Second Installment of Secured Property Tax Bill Before Penalties Are Added • May 7 Last Day to File Business Property and Vessel Property Statement Before a 10% Penalty is Added • July 1 Assessor Delivers Property Tax Roll To Auditor-Controller • July 2 First Day to File Assessment Appeal (For Assessments Dated Jan. 1 — July 1) • July 31 Business Personal Property Taxes Due (Unsecured Property Taxes) • Aug 31 Last Day to Pay Business Personal Property Tax Bill Before Penaties Are Added • Nov 1 First Installment Due (Secured Property Tax Bill) • Nov 30 Last Day to File An Appeal • Dec 10 Last Day to Pay First Installment of Secured Property Tax Bill Before Penalties Are Added Last Day to File A Claim For Partial (80%) On All Exemptions Last Day to Terminate Homeowner’s Exemption Without Penalty * Dates are the same each year. If date falls on a Sunday or a holiday, final date is the following business day. WWW.SBASSESSOR.ORG San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors The mission of the Office of the Assessor is to perform the state mandated function to: Locate, describe, and identify ownership of all property within the county Establish a taxable value for all property subject to taxation List all taxable value on the assessment roll Apply all legal exemptions Protecting the rights of taxpayers Assessor business is performed for the public benefit in a manner that is fair, informative and with uniform treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Santa Ana River Watershed Uncontrollable Bacterial Sources Study Final Report
    Middle Santa Ana River Watershed Uncontrollable Bacterial Sources Study Final Report Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501 June 2016 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Literature Review ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.1 Direct inputs from wildlife ......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.2 Resuspension from sediment and biofilm .......................................................................................... 1-3 1.3.3 Shedding during swimming....................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.4 Equestrian recreational use ...................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Study Framework ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Opportunities & Constraints Analysis
    BASELINE OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Prepared For: City of Riverside Planning Division 3900 Main Street Riverside, California 92522 Prepared By: RICK – Community Planning & Sustainable Development 5620 Friars Road San Diego, California 92110 In Association With: Design Workshop 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 - DUDEK 3544 University Avenue Riverside, California 92501 - Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 555 West Beech Street, Suite 460 San Diego, California 92101 Northside Specific Plan Baseline Report Memorandum Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... i Baseline Report Study Area ....................................................................................................................... i Section 1: Land Use ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Constraints .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Opportunities ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Section 2: Visual Character & Urban Design ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    TIN/TDS Study - Phase 2A of the Santa Ana Watershed Development of Groundwater Management Zones Estimation of Historical and Current TDS and Nitrogen Concentrations in Groundwater Final Technical Memorandum Prepared for the TIN/TDS Task Force July 2000 Wildermuth WE Environmental, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................1-1 2. DATA SOURCES .......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Data Request............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Other Data Sources................................................................................................................... 2-1 3. UPDATED BOUNDARY MAPS FOR MANAGEMENT ZONES ..................................................3-1 3.1 Objective................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Procedure.................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Development of Management Zone Boundaries ...................................................................... 3-3 3.3.1. San Bernardino Valley and Yucaipa/Beaumont Plains................................................................. 3-3 3.3.2. San Jacinto Basins .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]