DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Operational Risk Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 13 | January 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Operational Risk Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 13 | January 2014 Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Operational Risk Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 13 | January 2014 www.allenovery.com 2 CRD IV Framework: Operational Risk | January 2014 CRD IV Framework: Operational Risk This briefing paper is part of a series of briefings on relevant to the in-house lawyer. This briefing is for the implementation of Basel III in Europe via the general guidance only and does not constitute Capital Requirements Directive IV1 (CRD IV) and definitive advice. the Capital Requirements Regulation2 (CRR), replacing the Banking Consolidation Directive3 and NOTE: In relation to the topics discussed in the Capital Adequacy Directive.4 The legislation is this briefing, the CRR contains a number of highly complex: these briefings are intended to discretions for member states in relation to provide a high-level overview of the architecture of national implementation. The regime may the regulatory capital and liquidity framework and therefore differ across member states in a to draw attention to the legal issues likely to be number of respects. 1 2013/36/EU. This briefing paper is based on information 2 Regulation 575/2013. 3 2006/48/EU. available as of 17 January 2014. 4 2006/49/EU. Background and scope Sources Basel II introduced a requirement for credit institutions CRD IV (Directive 2013/36/EU): Article 85. and investment firms to hold capital specifically to cover operational risk losses. Operational risk (defined CRR (Regulation 575/2013): Article 20, Article 95, as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed Title III (Articles 312-324), Article 446, Article 454, internal processes, people and systems or from external Article 500, Recital (52). events, including legal risk) had not historically been subject to capital adequacy requirements. In Basel I, European Banking Authority (EBA)’s Guidelines on operational risk was implicitly covered through the the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) – treatment of credit and market risk. Extensions and Changes (January 2012). Pillar One of Basel II established hard capital Committee of European Banking Supervisors requirements for operational risk – the operational risk (CEBS)’ Guidelines on the management of capital requirement (ORCR). There are three operational risk in market-related activities approaches that may be taken to the measurement of (October 2010). operational risk capital: CEBS’ Guidelines on operational risk mitigation Basic indicator approach; techniques (December 2009). Standardised approach (or the alternative UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Policy standardised approach); or Statement (PS13/10) CRD IV for Investment Firms (December 2013). An advanced measurement approach (AMA). © Allen & Overy LLP 2014 3 Background and scope (continued) Sources (continued) The basic indicator and standardised approaches use UK Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) Policy percentages of net income associated with the relevant Statement (PS7/13) Strengthening capital standards: business as a proxy for operational risk. AMA uses implementing CRD IV, feedback and final rules more sophisticated means of establishing the (December 2013). operational risk requirement, and requires significant resources, and robust systems and controls, to PRA Supervisory Statement (SS14/13) Operational implement and maintain. AMA falls within the risk (December 2013) (the PRA Supervisory definition of “internal approaches” for the purposes of Statement in respect of Operational Risk). CRD IV. PRA Supervisory Statement (SS8/13) The Basel I The operational risk provisions of Basel II were floor (December 2013) (the PRA Supervisory implemented in the EEA via the Banking Consolidation Statement in respect of the Basel I Floor). Directive and Capital Adequacy Directive (together, the CRD) and in the UK through the SYSC5 and BIPRU6 modules of the FSA7 Handbook. Basel III does not involve substantive change to operational risk provisions but the way in which they are implemented in the European Union (the EU) has changed as they are now included in the directly applicable CRR. This has implications for the scope for and method of providing flexibility at national level (see “National discretions and UK implementation” below). 5 Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls. 6 Prudential sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms. 7 UK Financial Services Authority. www.allenovery.com 4 CRD IV Framework: Operational Risk | January 2014 Application The ORCR applies to credit institutions and full execution and portfolio management and which scope investment firms. may carry out the activities of reception/transmission of orders and/or The following limited scope investment firms are investment advice but which does not carry out not subject to the ORCR: the activities of dealing on own account, underwriting, placing financial instruments, (i) an investment firm that is not authorised to operation of multilateral trading facilities deal on own account or provide the investment (MTFs) or safekeeping and administration of services of underwriting or placing financial financial instruments for the account of clients instruments on a firm commitment basis; and and which is not permitted to hold client money or securities. (ii) an investment firm which is authorised to provide the investment services of client order © Allen & Overy LLP 2014 5 Basic indicator approach The simplest method of calculating the ORCR is subsidiary of a parent which is also the parent of the the basic indicator approach. A firm must use this credit institution/investment firm); or which is approach if it does not, or is not permitted to, use subject to rules under, or equivalent to, the CRR. another approach. The ORCR under the basic Fees paid for outsourcing must be included in indicator approach is equal to 15% of the average operating expenses (and so not deducted from the over three years of the “relevant indicator”. The relevant indicator) when the conditions above are relevant indicator is the sum of a firm’s net interest not met. income and its net non-interest income. Income from a participation held in an undertaking by the A firm that does not have sufficient income data to firm or a subsidiary undertaking of the firm should meet the three-year requirement (eg a start-up) may not be included in the relevant indicator calculations, use its forecasted gross income projections for all or to ensure that intra-group dividends and other intra- part of the three year time period when calculating group income flows are not double counted. its relevant indicator. The following elements must not be used in the If a firm can prove to its regulator that, due to a calculation of the relevant indicator: merger, an acquisition or a disposal of entities or activities, using a three year average to calculate the (i) realised profits/losses from the sale of non- relevant indicator would lead to a biased estimation trading book items; of its ORCR, the regulator may permit it to amend the calculation to take account of such events. The (ii) income from extraordinary or irregular items; regulator must inform the EBA of its decision. The and regulator may also, on its own initiative, require a firm to amend its calculation in such circumstances. (iii) income derived from insurance. A firm calculating its ORCR using the basic The relevant indicator for the basic indicator indicator approach is required to meet the general approach must be calculated before the deduction risk management standards in CRD IV. These of any provisions and operating expenses. Fees paid require a firm to have robust governance for outsourcing can be deducted from the relevant arrangements, effective risk management processes indicator when the outsourcing is to a third party and adequate internal control mechanisms which is a parent or subsidiary of the firm whose appropriate to its size, nature, scale and complexity. process, service or activity is being outsourced (or a www.allenovery.com 6 CRD IV Framework: Operational Risk | January 2014 Standardised approach Under the standardised approach, a firm must To be eligible for the standardised approach, in divide its activities into a number of business lines addition to the general risk management standards and calculate a capital requirement for operational in CRD IV, a firm must have: risk for each business line as a specified percentage of a relevant indicator. The ORCR under the a well-documented assessment and management standardised approach is the average over three system for operational risk with clear years of the risk weighted relevant indicators responsibilities for the system assigned within the calculated each year across the business lines. This firm. The system must identify the firm’s is a three stage process – first, the firm must map its exposures to operational risk and track relevant previous three years of net interest income and net operational risk data, including material loss data; non-interest income to the eight business lines set out below; second, individual business line ORCRs an operational risk assessment and management are calculated by multiplying the firm’s three year system subject to regular independent review; average net interest income and net non-interest an operational risk assessment system closely income in each business line by the percentage (beta integrated into the firm’s risk management factor) assigned to that business line; and finally, the processes. Its output must be an integral part of total ORCR is calculated as the sum of the the process of monitoring and controlling the individual business line ORCRs. firm’s operational risk profile; and A firm must develop and document specific policies and criteria for mapping the relevant indicator for a system of management reporting that provides current business lines and activities into the operational risk reports to relevant functions framework for the standardised approach. The within the firm. A firm must have procedures in mapping process must meet a number of principles place for taking appropriate action in response to including senior management responsibility for the the information contained in such reports. mapping policy and independent review.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Regulation and Treatment of Trade Finance: What Are the Issues?
    Staff Working Paper ERSD-2010-09 February 2010 World Trade Organization Economic Research and Statistics Division INTERNATIONAL REGULATION AND TREATMENT OF TRADE FINANCE: WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? Marc Auboin: WTO Manuscript date: February 2010 Disclaimer: This is a working paper, and hence it represents research in progress. This paper represents the opinions of the author, and is the product of professional research. It is not meant to represent the position or opinions of the WTO or its Members, nor the official position of any staff members. Any errors are the fault of the author. Copies of working papers can be requested from the divisional secretariat by writing to: Economic Research and Statistics Division, World Trade Organization, Rue de Lausanne 154, CH 1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland. Please request papers by number and title. INTERNATIONAL REGULATION AND TREATMENT OF TRADE FINANCE: WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? Marc Auboin 1 Abstract The paper discusses a number of issues related to the treatment of trade credit internationally, a priori (treatment by banking regulators) and a posteriori (treatment by debtors and creditors in the case of default), which are currently of interest to the trade finance community, in particular the traditional providers of trade credit and guarantees, such as banks, export credit agencies, regional development banks, and multilateral agencies. The paper does not deal with the specific issue of regulation of official insured-export credit, under the OECD Arrangement, which is a specific matter left out of this analysis. Traditionally, trade finance has received preferred treatment on the part of national and international regulators, as well as by international financial agencies in the treatment of trade finance claims, on grounds that trade finance was one of the safest, most collateralized, and self- liquidating forms of trade finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Operational Risk BIA And
    CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA Guidance Notes on the Calculation of Capital Requirement for Operational Risk Basic Indicator Approach (BIA) and the Standardized Approach (TSA) TABLE OF CONTENTS OPERATIONAL RISK CAPITAL REQUIREMENT ........................................................................... 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Calculation Approaches ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Adoption of Approaches ................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF OPERATIONAL RISKS ................................... 4 2.1 Board and Management ................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Processes and Procedure ............................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Reversion of Approaches ................................................................................................................ 5 2.5 Sound Practices for Operational Risk Management ........................................................... 5 3.0 BASIC INDICATOR APPROACH (BIA) ................................................................................. 5 3.1 Calculation Method .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Operational Risk: Possibilities and Limitations
    Quantifying Operational Risk: Possibilities and Limitations Hansj¨org Furrer ETH Z¨urich [email protected]/∼hjfurrer (Based on joint work with Paul Embrechts and Roger Kaufmann) Deutsche Bundesbank Training Centre, Eltville 19-20 March 2004 Managing OpRisk Contents A. The New Accord (Basel II) B. Risk measurement methods for OpRisks C. Advanced Measurement Approaches (AMA) D. Conclusions E. References Managing OpRisk 1 A. The New Accord (Basel II) • 1988: Basel Accord (Basel I): minimum capital requirements against credit risk. One standardised approach • 1996: Amendment to Basel I: market risk. • 1999: First Consultative Paper on the New Accord (Basel II). • 2003: CP3: Third Consultative Paper on the New Basel Capital Accord. (www.bis.org/bcbs/bcbscp3.htmcp3) • mid 2004: Revision of CP3 • end of 2006: full implementation of Basel II ([9]) Managing OpRisk 2 What’s new? • Rationale for the New Accord: More flexibility and risk sensitivity • Structure of the New Accord: Three-pillar framework: Pillar 1: minimal capital requirements (risk measurement) Pillar 2: supervisory review of capital adequacy Pillar 3: public disclosure Managing OpRisk 3 What’s new? (cont’d) • Two options for the measurement of credit risk: Standard approach Internal rating based approach (IRB) • Pillar 1 sets out the minimum capital requirements: total amount of capital ≥ 8% risk-weighted assets • MRC (minimum regulatory capital)def= 8% of risk-weighted assets • New regulatory capital approach for operational risk (the risk of losses resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or external events) Managing OpRisk 4 What’s new? (cont’d) • Notation: COP: capital charge for operational risk • Target: COP ≈ 12% of MRC • Estimated total losses in the US (2001): $50b • Some examples 1977: Credit Suisse Chiasso-affair 1995: Nick Leeson/Barings Bank, £1.3b 2001: Enron (largest US bankruptcy so far) 2003: Banque Cantonale de Vaudoise, KBV Winterthur Managing OpRisk 5 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III on Letters of Credit and Trade Finance
    Impact of Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III on Letters of Credit and Trade Finance Requirement Basel I Basel II Basel III 2013 2015 2019 Common Equity 2.0% of 3.5% of RWA 4.5% of RWA 4.5% of RWA RWA Tier 1 Capital 4.0% of 4.0% of 4.5% of RWA 6.0% of RWA 6.0% of RWA RWA RWA Total Capital 8.0% of 8.0% of 8.0% of RWA 8.0% of RWA 8.0% of RWA RWA RWA Capital Conversion -0- -0- +2.5% of RWA Buffer Leverage Ratio Observation Observation (4% of direct assets) (based on Total Capital) 3% of total direct and contingent assets Counter Cyclical Buffer +Up to 2.5% of RWA Liquidity Coverage Observation 30 days 30 days Net Stable Funding Observation Observation 1 year Additional Loss +1% to 2.5% of RWA Absorbency Color Code Key (US Applicability): (Applies only in the US) In the US, applies only to “Large, Internationally-Active Banks” Not yet implemented in the US Depending on the bank and the point in the economic cycle, under Basel III, the total capital requirement for a bank in 2019 may be as much as 15.5% of Risk-Weighted Assets (“RWA”), compared with 8% under Basel I and Basel II. The amount of Risk-Weighted Assets (“RWA”) is computed by multiplying the amount of each asset and contingent asset by a risk weighting and a Credit Conversion Factor (“CCF”) Under Basel I, risk weightings are set: 0% for sovereign obligors, 20% for banks where tenors ≤ one year, 50% for municipalities and residential mortgages, 100% for all corporate obligors Under Basel II, risk weightings are based on internal or external (rating agency) risk ratings with no special distinction for banks; capital requirements for exposures to banks are increased by as much as 650% (from 20% to as much as 150%) The Credit Conversion Factor for Letters of Credit varies under Basel I vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel Area Brochure
    Basel economic area Optimal conditions for business success Dear Reader The Basel economic area is home to Europe’s largest life sci- ences cluster. Successful pharmaceutical, biotech and agrochem- ical companies provide for the highest hourly productivity in the industry worldwide. Global companies such as Roche, Novartis and Syngenta, as well as many up-and-coming companies, for example Actelion, have their headquarters here. But Basel’s success is not only based on the life sciences. Studies by UBS and Credit Suisse show that the region today is optimally diversified in growth industries. These include the watch industry, medical engineering and logistics. The greatest strength of the Basel economic area lies in its geo- graphic concentration of skills in universities and companies. Moti- vated and highly qualified people working in research, develop- ment and applications are providing for the strongest economic growth in Switzerland. People feel at home in the Basel area. The population, around 30 percent of whom are foreigners, enjoys a cultural diversity and quality of life that are without parallel. Entrepreneurs appreciate the political stability, the legal certainty and an infrastructure that offers them a predictably ideal environment. Basel is one of the best business regions in the world. We would be happy to provide you with support in your efforts to settle in this first-class location. Dr. Franz Saladin CEO BaselArea 1 Open to the world. Basel is one of the world’s economic hotbeds. Companies based here benefit from a location that combines cosmopolitan living and an international environment with excellent operating conditions and a high quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Canton of Basel-Stadt
    Canton of Basel-Stadt Welcome. VARIED CITY OF THE ARTS Basel’s innumerable historical buildings form a picturesque setting for its vibrant cultural scene, which is surprisingly rich for THRIVING BUSINESS LOCATION CENTRE OF EUROPE, TRINATIONAL such a small canton: around 40 museums, AND COSMOPOLITAN some of them world-renowned, such as the Basel is Switzerland’s most dynamic busi- Fondation Beyeler and the Kunstmuseum ness centre. The city built its success on There is a point in Basel, in the Swiss Rhine Basel, the Theater Basel, where opera, the global achievements of its pharmaceut- Ports, where the borders of Switzerland, drama and ballet are performed, as well as ical and chemical companies. Roche, No- France and Germany meet. Basel works 25 smaller theatres, a musical stage, and vartis, Syngenta, Lonza Group, Clariant and closely together with its neighbours Ger- countless galleries and cinemas. The city others have raised Basel’s profile around many and France in the fields of educa- ranks with the European elite in the field of the world. Thanks to the extensive logis- tion, culture, transport and the environment. fine arts, and hosts the world’s leading con- tics know-how that has been established Residents of Basel enjoy the superb recre- temporary art fair, Art Basel. In addition to over the centuries, a number of leading in- ational opportunities in French Alsace as its prominent classical orchestras and over ternational logistics service providers are well as in Germany’s Black Forest. And the 1000 concerts per year, numerous high- also based here. Basel is a successful ex- trinational EuroAirport Basel-Mulhouse- profile events make Basel a veritable city hibition and congress city, profiting from an Freiburg is a key transport hub, linking the of the arts.
    [Show full text]
  • From Basel I to Basel II to Basel III Pushpkant Shakdwipee, Masuma Mehta
    International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN:2454-4116, Volume-3, Issue-1, January 2017 Pages 66-70 From Basel I to Basel II to Basel III Pushpkant Shakdwipee, Masuma Mehta redeposit, and to discourage such a reduction in the first Abstract— The financial system of a country is of immense place". In her article “Why the Banking System Should Be use and plays a vital role in shaping the economic development Regulated", Dow reasons, that regulation is warranted for a nation. It consists of financial intermediaries and financial markets which channels funds from those who have savings to because the moneyness of bank liabilities is a public good". those who have more productive use for them, in a way leading The state in turn produces moneyness by inspiring confidence to money creation. The volume and growth of the capital in the in moneys capacity to retain value (Dow, 1996). economy solely depends on the efficiency and intensity of the operations and activities carried out in the financial markets. Following this line of argument, (Dowd, 1996) derives the One of the most important functions of the financial system is to necessity to regulate banks from the role they play in financial share risk which is catered mainly by the banking sector. intermediation, providing liquidity, monitoring and (Cortez, 2011) Banks are betting that the individuals and information services. Such importance may increase the companies to whom they lend capital will earn enough money to pay back their loans. This process leads to generation of Risk probability of a systemic crisis and lead to substantial social and in turn necessitates Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Guidance Notes on Operational Risk Calculation.Pdf
    CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA GUIDANCE NOTES ON THE CALCULATION OF CAPITAL REQUIREMENT FOR OPERATIONAL RISK FOR NON-INTEREST FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN NIGERIA BASIC INDICATOR APPROACH AND THE STANDARDIZED APPROACH AUGUST, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of terms ............................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Operational Risk Capital Requirement ....................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Calculation Approaches ......................................................................................... 4 1.3 Adoption of Approaches ......................................................................................... 4 2.0 GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF OPERATIONAL RISKS .................... 4 2.1 Board, Management and Advisory Committee of Experts (ACE)........................ 4 2.2 Processes and Procedures ....................................................................................... 5 2.3 Reversion of Approaches ........................................................................................ 5 2.4 Sound Practices for Operational Risk Management ............................................. 5 3.0 BASIC INDICATOR APPROACH (BIA) ................................................................... 5 3.1 Calculation Method ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basel Ii/Iii Implementation Roadmap for the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union
    BASEL II/III IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP FOR THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN CURRENCY UNION Bank Supervision Department EASTERN CARIBBEAN CENTRAL BANK ST KITTS BASEL II/III IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP FOR THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN CURRENCY UNION 1.0 PURPOSE This Roadmap provides an overview of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank’s (ECCB/the Central Bank) Basel II/III implementation programme for the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU). The document outlines the Central Bank’s approach towards implementation, the implementation options selected and key deliverables/activities. The Roadmap is intended to guide the expectations and actions of all stakeholders associated with the Basel II/III implementation process. 2.0 INTRODUCTION The ECCB is committed to implementing certain aspects of Basel II/III in the ECCU for computing the capital adequacy of institutions licenced under the Banking Act 2015 (the Act), in accordance with Sections 46 and 47 of the Act1. Towards this end, the ECCB established a dedicated team (Basel Implementation Group) for spearheading the implementation effort and a Basel II/III Working Committee comprising of representatives from the ECCB, ECCU Bankers Association and commercial banks, for collaborating with the banking industry on an ongoing basis. The Central Bank sought comments on some draft standards2 in 2018 and plans to continue to deepen its interaction with licensees via a number of consultations and training sessions. Basel II/III constitutes a more comprehensive measure of capital adequacy than the existing Basel I. Basel II/III seeks to align regulatory capital requirements more closely with the underlying risks that banks face. The framework requires banks to assess the riskiness of their assets with respect to credit, market and operational risks and seeks to ensure that banks’ minimum capital requirements better reflect inherent risks in their portfolios, risk management practices and accompanying disclosures to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • (RCAP) Assessment of Basel III Regulations –
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Regulatory Consistency Assessment Programme (RCAP) Assessment of Basel III regulations – United States of America December 2014 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2014. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 978-92-9197-012-4 (print) ISBN 978-92-9197-011-7 (online) Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Preface ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Response from United States ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Context, scope and main assessment findings ................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Context ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Disclosures
    2021 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital & Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplementary Disclosures As at March 31, 2021 HSBC Bank Canada Pillar 3 Supplementary Disclosure First Quarter 2021 1 Contents Page Notes to users 3 Road map to Pillar 3 disclosures 4 Capital and RWA 5 Regulatory Capital Disclosure - CC1 5 Overview of Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) - OV1 6 Credit Risk 6 RWA flow statements of credit risk exposures under IRB - CR8 6 Market Risk 6 RWA flow statements of market risk exposures under an Internal Model Approach (IMA) - MR2 7 Leverage Ratio 7 Summary comparison of accounting assets vs. leverage ratio exposure measure (LR1) 7 Leverage Ratio Common Disclosure (LR2) 8 Glossary 9 2 HSBC Bank Canada Pillar 3 Supplementary Disclosure First Quarter 2021 Notes to users Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Disclosures The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (“OSFI”) supervises HSBC Bank Canada (the “Bank”) on a consolidated basis. OSFI has approved the Bank’s application to apply the Advanced Internal Ratings Based (“AIRB”) approach to credit risk on our portfolio and the Standardized Approach for measuring Operational Risk. Please refer to the Annual Report and Accounts 2020 for further information on the Bank’s risk and capital management framework. Further information regarding HSBC Group Risk Management Processes can be found in HSBC Holdings plc Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Disclosures available on HSBC Group’s investor relations web site. The Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures are additional summary
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts and Implementation of the Basel Accords: Contrasting Argentina, Brazil, and Chile Kristina Bergess Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2012 Impacts and Implementation of the Basel Accords: Contrasting Argentina, Brazil, and Chile Kristina Bergess Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Bergess, Kristina, "Impacts and Implementation of the Basel Accords: Contrasting Argentina, Brazil, and Chile" (2012). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 310. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/310 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE IMPACTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BASEL ACCORDS: CONTRASTING ARGENTINA, BRAZIL, AND CHILE SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR WILLIAM ASCHER AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY KRISTINA BERGESS FOR SENIOR THESIS YEAR 2012 APRIL 23, 2012 Acknowledgments To Professor Bill Ascher: Thank you for four years of guidance, good laughs, patience, and enlightenment. You have challenged me, and I am graduating a little bit smarter because of you. To my father: There will never be enough words. Let me just thank you for all those supportive late-night calls, from New York (where it was very early in the morning) to California, to make sure I had not fallen asleep at the computer and that I was still working hard. Now that my thesis is complete, hopefully we can both get a good night’s sleep. To Rosabella Magat: You were there to inspire me and to patiently answer all of my questions. You were there all those late nights to help keep me awake, or to unwind from my thesis challenges.
    [Show full text]