Massachusetts Animals – Eastern Chipmunk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Massachusetts Animals – Eastern Chipmunk Facts at a Glance TYPE OF ANIMAL Mammal SCIENTIFIC NAME Tamias striatus FOUND WHERE Across the eastern U.S. and Canada HEIGHT/LENGTH 4 – 11 in. (10.5 - 28 cm) WEIGHT Averges from 1 - 5 oz. (28 – 142 g) CONSERVATION STATUS Least Concern Though chipmunks are the smallest members of the squirrel family, Eastern chipmunks are the largest species of chipmunk. These small, furry, and quite cute animals are identified by their redd-ish brown fur with white, black, and brown striped markings running down their backs. They have small, stubby legs and bushy tails that can get as long as 5 inches. They can often be seen with their pudgy cheeks stuffed full of seeds and nuts before they dart to the safety of a woody hallow. HABITAT LIFE & BEHAVIOUR Chipmunks are terrestrial animals that can be Chipmunks spend the bulk of their time foraging found all across the United States. Eastern for foods, which they stuff in their generous cheek chipmunks roam across the Eastern half of pouches. In the open, they are susceptible to North America, from the Great plains to predators like hawks, foxes, coyotes, and snakes. Quebec. They can be found just about They make a variety of birdlike chirping sounds to anywhere there are trees present. communicate threats, mating calls, and family These small mammals prefer to make their greetings. homes in underground burrows or nest in logs, These animals are typically seen as cute mammals trees, or bushes. or pests, but they are beneficial ecosystem players, spreading seedings, aerating soils, and distributing DIET nutrients to root systems. Chipmunks are omnivores and will eat a variety of foods. They mainly eat vegetation and fungi, FUN FACT such as mushrooms, berries, nuts, seeds, and small grains. However, they will also eat small A chipmunk’s cheek pouches can expand up insects, frogs, bird eggs, and possibly even baby to three times the size of their heads in birds. order to store food! They store up to 8 lbs of food for the winter They store food in nesting holes to last them months. through the winter. Created by Kimberley Berry & Distributed by the Southborough Stewardship Committee .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan
Badlands National Park – North Unit Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Badlands National Park, North Unit Pennington and Jackson Counties, South Dakota Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan Environmental Assessment August 2007 Badlands National Park – North Unit Environmental Assessment National Park Service Prairie Dog Management Plan U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Management Plan Environmental Assessment Badlands National Park, North Unit Pennington and Jackson Counties, South Dakota Executive Summary The U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service (NPS) proposes to implement a comprehensive black-tailed prairie dog management plan for the North Unit of Badlands National Park where prairie dog populations have increased from approximately 2,070 acres in 1979 to 6,363 acres in 2006, or 11% of the approximately 60,000 acres of available suitable habitat. The principal objectives of the management plan are to ensure that the black-tailed prairie dog is maintained in its role as a keystone species in the mixed-grass prairie ecosystem on the North Unit, while providing strategies to effectively manage instances of prairie dog encroachment onto adjacent private lands. The plan also seeks to manage the North Unit’s prairie dog populations to sustain numbers sufficient to survive unpredictable events that may cause high mortality, such as sylvatic plague, while at the same time allowing park managers to meet management goals for other North Unit resources. Primary considerations in developing the plan include conservation of the park’s natural processes and conditions, identification of effective tools for prairie dog management, implementing strategies to deal with prairie dog encroachment onto adjacent private lands, and protection of human health and safety.
[Show full text]
Tamias Ruficaudus Simulans, Red-Tailed Chipmunk
Conservation Assessment for the Red-Tailed Chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus simulans) in Washington Jennifer Gervais May 2015 Oregon Wildlife Institute Disclaimer This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus simulans). If you have information that will assist in conserving this species or questions concerning this Conservation Assessment, please contact the interagency Conservation Planning Coordinator for Region 6 Forest Service, BLM OR/WA in Portland, Oregon, via the Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program website at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/sfpnw/issssp/contactus/ U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Executive Summary Species: Red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus) Taxonomic Group: Mammal Management Status: The red-tailed chipmunk is considered abundant through most of its range in western North America, but it is highly localized in Alberta, British Columbia, and Washington (Jacques 2000, Fig. 1). The species is made up of two fairly distinct subspecies, T. r. simulans in the western half of its range, including Washington, and T. r. ruficaudus in the east (e.g., Good and Sullivan 2001, Hird and Sullivan 2009). In British Columbia, T. r. simulans is listed as Provincial S3 or of conservation concern and is on the provincial Blue List (BC Conservation Data Centre 2014). The Washington Natural Heritage Program lists the red-tailed chipmunk’s global rank as G2, “critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction,” and its state status as S2 although the S2 rank is uncertain.
[Show full text]
Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel Or Chipmunk? by Lynne Brosch
Who Is Your Pest? Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel or Chipmunk? by Lynne Brosch Recently as I went around the lake doing talks on pest management, I had several complaints about chipmunks. People describe a lot of digging and eating of plants by these chipmunks. As I began thinking about putting out some information on how to handle the situation I thought about the golden-mantled ground squirrel, I watched eating garden plants voraciously on the Baldwin Estate grounds just yesterday. Perhaps gardeners need to know who they are dealing with. The golden-mantled ground squirrel looks a lot like a chipmunk. It has a large white stripe bordered by black on each side. The main difference between this squirrel and a chipmunk is that its stripes don’t go all the way to the face and it is a slightly larger animal. It lives along the west coast in coniferous forests and mountainous areas. It likes to eat plants, seeds, nuts, fruit and some insects. It lives in an underground burrow usually near trees or logs. Chipmunks have very similar burrows. Most common in the Tahoe basin is the Lodgepole chipmunk. Fencing can be used to protect plants from squirrels and chipmunks, but has challenges in effectiveness because of the excellent digging and climbing skills exhibited by these garden pests. Hardware cloth may be used to exclude animals from flower beds with seeds and bulbs covered by the hardware cloth and all covered with soil. This method of prevention may prove less costly and time consuming than trapping. The most successful method for control of ground squirrels and chipmunks is the use of traps.
[Show full text]
A Guide to the Mammals of Beijing Last Update 11 December 2020
Birding Beijing A Guide to the Mammals of Beijing Last update 11 December 2020 Terry Townshend Cover photo: Tolai Hare (Terry Townshend) A GUIDE TO THE MAMMALS OF BEIJING Introduction This guide has been collated to help residents and visitors to Beijing interested in specifically looking for mammals and/or identifying any species they record through casual observations. Given the lack of english-language resources and data this guide is certainly not comprehensive and reflects only a partial summary of the mammals in the capital. At the moment it includes information about only some of the orders and families. For example, mice, rats, voles, shrews, moles and bats are not included; as information is discovered or made available, the guide will be updated to rectify as many of these omissions as possible. Please contact Birding Beijing if you can help improve the information contained in this guide in any way. Individual sightings of any mammal in Beijing are also of interest. Please send any details, including species, location, date and time via email to [email protected] . Thank you. Format The list of mammals follows the order of “A Guide to the Mammals of China” by Andrew T Smith and Yan Xie, the best reference guide to mammals in China. The format includes English name, scientific name, Chinese name and ‘pinyin’ (the Romanisation of Chinese characters based on their pronunciation). Photos are included where available together with a short paragraph about the status in Beijing. A GUIDE TO THE MAMMALS OF BEIJING The Mammals Pere David’s Rock Squirrel ‒ Sciurotamias davidianus ‒ 岩松鼠 ‒ Yansongshu Common in mountainous areas such as Fangshan, Huairou, Mentougou and Yanqing Districts.
[Show full text]
Treatment Approaches Aimed at Keeping Chipmunks in Tune
Vet Times The website for the veterinary profession https://www.vettimes.co.uk TREATMENT APPROACHES AIMED AT KEEPING CHIPMUNKS IN TUNE Author : Livia Benato Categories : Vets Date : August 3, 2009 Livia Benato details the biology of an increasingly popular pet animal, and explains how husbandry and environment make a difference to their health CHIPMUNKS are rodents belonging to the family Sciuridae. The most common species found in captivity are the Siberian (Eutamias sibiricus) and eastern (Tamias striatus) chipmunks. The Siberian chipmunk is native to Siberia, Mongolia, Korea and the northern regions of China and Japan. The eastern chipmunk is common in the east coast and mid-western states of North America, from Hudson Bay to Mississippi and from Minnesota to the Atlantic coast. Coat colours and dentition are the main distinguishing features between these species. While both have five black stripes on their back, the eastern chipmunk also has a white stripe between two black stripes on each flank. The Siberian chipmunk also has two upper premolars in each dental arcade, while the eastern chipmunk has one (Table 1). The body length (head to tail tip) of an adult chipmunk is approximately 20cm to 25cm, with the tail comprising 10cm of the overall length. Bodyweight is between 70g and 120g. Similar to hamsters, chipmunks transport food and nest material in cheek pouches. When the cheek pouches are fully expanded, they extend to the shoulders and reach a volume close to the size of their head. 1 / 17 In a similar fashion to other rodents, only the incisors grow continuously and have a characteristic yellow colour.
[Show full text]
Nuclear DNA Phylogeny of the Squirrels (Mammalia: Rodentia) and the Evolution of Arboreality from C-Myc and RAG1
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30 (2004) 703–719 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Nuclear DNA phylogeny of the squirrels (Mammalia: Rodentia) and the evolution of arboreality from c-myc and RAG1 Scott J. Steppan,a,* Brian L. Storz,a and Robert S. Hoffmannb a Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1100, USA b Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, MRC-108, Washington, DC 20560, USA Received 24 February 2003; revised 15 May 2003 Abstract Although the family Sciuridae is large and well known, phylogenetic analyses are scarce. We report on a comprehensive mo- lecular phylogeny for the family. Two nuclear genes (c-myc and RAG1) comprising approximately 4500 bp of data (most in exons) are applied for the first time to rodent phylogenetics. Parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses of the separate gene regions and combined data reveal five major lineages and refute the conventional elevation of the flying squirrels (Pteromyinae) to subfamily status. Instead, flying squirrels are derived from one of the tree squirrel lineages. C-myc indels corroborate the sequence-based topologies. The common ancestor of extant squirrels appears to have been arboreal, confirming the fossil evidence. The results also reveal an unexpected clade of mostly terrestrial squirrels with African and Holarctic centers of diversity. We present a revised classification of squirrels. Our results demonstrate the phylogenetic utility of relatively slowly evolving nuclear exonic data even for relatively recent clades. Ó 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. 1. Introduction compromised by an incomplete understanding of their phylogenetic relationships.
[Show full text]
Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico, 1986 J
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska State Museum 12-12-1986 Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico, 1986 J. Knox Jones Jr. Texas Tech University Dilford C. Carter Texas Tech University Hugh H. Genoways University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Robert S. Hoffmann University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dale W. Rice National Museum of Natural History See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museummammalogy Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Jones, J. Knox Jr.; Carter, Dilford C.; Genoways, Hugh H.; Hoffmann, Robert S.; Rice, Dale W.; and Jones, Clyde, "Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico, 1986" (1986). Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum. 266. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museummammalogy/266 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors J. Knox Jones Jr., Dilford C. Carter, Hugh H. Genoways, Robert S. Hoffmann, Dale W. Rice, and Clyde Jones This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museummammalogy/ 266 Jones, Carter, Genoways, Hoffmann, Rice & Jones, Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University (December 12, 1986) number 107. U.S.
[Show full text]
Influence of Predator Presence on Chipmunk (Tamias) Activity in Western Montana
Nez1 Influence of Predator Presence on Chipmunk (Tamias) Activity in Western Montana BIOS 35501-02: Practicum in Environmental Field Biology Renai R. Nez Advisor: Dr. David Flagel Nez2 Abstract The least (Tamias minimus), red-tailed (Tamias rudicaudus), and yellow-pine (Tamias amoenus) chipmunks are the three species that are known to be distribute throughout western Montana. In comparison to chipmunks that are found in the Eastern states, they are understudied species. This experiment tests the amount of chipmunk activity that occurs when the odors of predators are present. The coyote (Canis latrans) and the bobcat (Lynx rufus) urine were chosen to represent the presences of a predator at each of the nine sites in the National Bison Range, Montana. The hypothesis is that the chipmunk activity of the coyote sites would have less intensity of tracks the bobcat sites. A standard measure for the minimum amount of chipmunk tracks was used to count for smeared areas, due to an increase amount of chipmunk activity. The treatments for the bobcat and the coyote urine were not significantly different, both of these sites had the greatest amount of chipmunk activity. There was a significant differences when both predator treatments to the control treatments. All control treatments had zero chipmunk activity. Keywords: Tamias, Tamias minimus, Tamias rudicaudus, Tamias amoenus, chipmunks, small mammals, coyote, bobcat, urine, animal behavior, Predator, prey interactions, seeds, foraging behavior Introduction Predator-prey interactions are natural behaviors among organisms, a continuous cycle occurring within an ecosystem. Hunting is an example of a continuous cycle that fulfills the predator’s needs for survival (Trites, 2002).
[Show full text]
Tamias Sibiricus (Siberian Chipmunk) [Original Text by Jean-Louis Capuis, Ekaterina Obolenskaya, Benoit Pisanu and Andrey Lissovsky] [Online]
Risk Assessment of Tamias sibiricus Name of Organism: Tamias sibiricus , Laxmann 1769 – Siberian Chipmunk Objective: Assess the risks associated with this species in Ireland Version: Final 15/09/2014 Author(s) Erin O’Rourke, John Kelly and Colette O’Flynn Expert reviewer Colin Lawton Stage 1 - Organism Information Stage 2 - Detailed Assessment Section A - Entry Section B - Establishment Section C - Spread Section D - Impact Section E - Conclusion Section F - Additional Questions About the risk assessment This risk assessment is based on the Non-native species AP plication based Risk Analysis (NAPRA) tool (version 2.66). NAPRA is a computer based tool for undertaking risk assessment of any non- native species. It was developed by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO) and adapted for Ireland and Northern Ireland by Invasive Species Ireland. It is based on the Computer Aided Pest Risk Analysis (CAPRA) software package which is a similar tool used by EPPO for risk assessment. Notes: Confidence is rated as low, medium, high or very high. Likelihood is rated as very unlikely, unlikely, moderately likely, likely or very likely. The percentage categories are 0% - 10%, 11% - 33%, 34% - 67%, 68% - 90% or 91% - 100%. N/A = not applicable. This is a joint project by Inland Fisheries Ireland and the National Biodiversity Data Centre to inform risk assessments of non-native species for the European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011. It is supported by the National Parks and Wildlife Service. Page 1 of 24 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Name of Document: Risk Assessment of Tamias sibiricus Author (s): Dr Erin O’Rourke, Mr.
[Show full text]
CHIPMUNKS Animal Damage Control Lincoln, Nebraska 68501
David E. Williams State Director USDA-APHIS- CHIPMUNKS Animal Damage Control Lincoln, Nebraska 68501 Robert M. Corrigan Staff Specialist Vertebrate Pest Management Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Fig. 1. Eastern chipmunk, Tamias striatus Damage Prevention and Frightening Toxicants Control Methods Not effective. None are federally registered. Check with local extension agents or a Exclusion Repellents USDA-APHIS-ADC personnel for Rodent-proof construction will Area repellents. Naphthalene (moth possible Special Local Needs 24(c) exclude chipmunks from structures. flakes or moth balls) may be effec- registrations. tive if liberally applied in confined Fumigants Use 1/4-inch (0.6-cm) mesh hardware places. cloth to exclude chipmunks from Generally impractical. gardens and flower beds. Taste repellents. Repellents containing bitrex, thiram, or ammonium soaps Trapping Habitat Modification of higher fatty acids applied to Rat-sized snap traps. Store food items, such as bird seed flower bulbs, seeds, and vegetation and dog food, in rodent-proof (not for human consumption) may Live (box or cage) traps. control feeding damage. containers. Glue boards. Ground covers, shrubs, and wood piles Shooting should not be located adjacent to structure foundations. Small gauge shotguns or .22-caliber rifles. PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE — 1994 Cooperative Extension Division Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Nebraska - Lincoln United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Damage Control B-13 Great Plains Agricultural Council Wildlife Committee a Chipmunks are generally solitary ex- Identification cept during courtship or when rearing Fifteen species of native chipmunks of young. the genus Eutamias and one of the The least chipmunk inhabits low sage- genus Tamias are found in North brush deserts, high mountain conifer- America.
[Show full text]
Mammal Tour Trail Book 12.18.Qxp
Mammal Tour on the Ridge Trail Enjoy a leisurely 1 mile hike on the Ridge Trail, while learning about our Northwoods mammals! A collaboration of the Cable Natural History Museum and the North End Ski Club, with metal mammals by Mark Blaskey. Can you ﬁnd all of the metal animal silhouettes along the way? The Mission of the Cable Natural History Museum is: Connecting people to Northwoods nature through educational experiences that inspire wonder, discovery and responsibility. We connect YOU to the Northwoods! For more information, visit www.cablemuseum.org, or www.norwiski.com/northend. Special thanks to Ron Caple for inspiring this project! This program made possible by a grant from the Wisconsin Environmental Education Board and by generous donors like you! Illustrations by Katie Connolly and Diana Randolph Mammal Tour on the Ridge Trail American Badger . .2 Northern Short-tailed Shrew . .3 Red Fox . .4 Fisher . .5 North American Porcupine . .6 Snowshoe Hare . .7 Bobcat . .8 Meadow Vole . .9 North American River Otter . .10 Striped Skunk . .11 American Marten . .12 Coyote . .13 Long-tailed Weasel, Short-tailed Weasel, Least Weasel . .14 American Black Bear . .15 Animal Location Map . .16-17 Northern Raccoon . .18 Muskrat . .19 American Beaver . .20 Northern Flying Squirrel . .21 Eastern Gray Squirrel . .22 Woodland Deer Mouse . .23 White-tailed Deer . .24 Gray Wolf . .25 Eastern Chipmunk . .26 Little Brown Bat . .27 Woodchuck . .28 Glossary . .29 Mammal Tracking Guide . .30-31 1 American Badger Taxidea taxus Mustelidae: Weasel Family The American badger has a ﬂat body with short legs, and a triangular shaped face with a long, pointed nose and small ears on the side of its head.
[Show full text]
Brief Note Dorsal and Anal Glands in the Eastern Chipmunk, Tamias
Copyright © 1979 Ohio Acad. Sci. 0030-0950/79/0001-0040$! .00/0 BRIEF NOTE DORSAL AND ANAL GLANDS IN THE EASTERN CHIPMUNK, T AM I AS STRIATUS1 RICHARD H. YAHNER,2 B. L. ALLEN and WESLEY J. PETERSON, Department of Zoology and Microbiology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701 OHIO J. SCI. 79(1): 40, 1979 Scent marks are important mechanisms means of synchronizing mating activity of exchanging information among con- in both T. sibiricus (Dobroruka 1972) and specifics, orienting individuals within T. striatus (Yahner 1978). We, therefore, home ranges, or integrating reproductive inspected tissue in the dorsal and the and social behavior in many species of anal regions of T. striatus for the occur- mammals (Eisenberg and Kleiman 1972). rence of scent glands. For example, ground squirrels [Spermo- Two captive, adult male chipmunks philus spp.) frequently scent mark by were sacrificed, and the skins were re- rubbing large, macroscopic, dorsal glands moved and fixed in alcohol-formalin- against substrata (Steiner 1974). Size acetic acid. The skins were examined and use of dorsal glands in this genus are macroscopically, both at removal and related to social organization. The most after fixation, for the presence of dorsal social ground squirrels have large glands and anal glands. Portions of tissue from and frequently scent mark; in contrast, the skin of one male were removed from the least social species have smaller the central region of the shoulder blades glands and never scent mark, except per- and from the anal region. The tissue haps in a passive manner when indi- specimens were washed in running tap viduals accidently touch tunnels of en- water and then dehydrated by the trances to burrow systems during passage standard procedure in graded percentages (Kivett el al 1976).
[Show full text]