1 SAMUEL J. MUIR (SBN 89883) STEPHEN B. LITCHFIELD (SBN 284951) 2 COLLINS COLLINS MUIR + STEWART LLP 3 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1700 Oakland, CA 94612 4 (510) 844-5100 – FAX (510) 844-5101

5 Attorneys for McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC. (erroneously sued herein as MCLARLAND, VARQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC.) 6 7

8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA —DOWNTOWN DISTRICT

10

11 CILKER APARTMENTS, LLC, ) CASE NO. 1-13-CV-258281 Complex ) [Assigned to Hon. Peter H. Kirwan; Dept. 1] 12 Plaintiffs, ) ) McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, 13 vs. ) INC.’S RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR 14 ) ADMISSION, SET ONE, PROPOUNDED BY WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, ) JELD-WEN, INC. 15 MCLARLAND, VARQUEZ & PARTNERS, ) INC., GROUP M ENGINEERS, GENTRY ) 16 ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION ) CONSULTANTS, LARCO INDUSTRIES, ) 17 FITCH PLASTERING, COURTNEY ) 18 WATERPROOFING, CELL CRETE, LOS ) NIETOS CONSTRUCTION, MADERA ) 19 FRAMING, KELLY DOOR, TARA ) COATNGS, LDI, ADM PAINTING, ) 20 ALLIANCE BUILDING PRODUCT, JOS. J. ) ALBANESE, ANDERSON TRUSS, ) 21 CALIFORNIA CLASSIC PAVERS, CASEY-) Filed: 12/26/13 22 FOGIL CONCRETE CONTRACTORS, ) FAC Filed: 03/20/14 CENTRAL COAST STAIRS, ) SAC Filed: 09/25/15 23 COMMERCIAL ROOF MANAGEMENT, ) Date: 06/13/16 DAVEY ROOFING, INC., DEMETRIS ) 24 PAINTING II, INC., DOORWAY MFG., ) LANDSCAPE PROS, MULTI-BUILDING ) 25 STRUCTURES, PARK WEST, PYRAMID ) 26 BUILDERS, ROBECKS WELDING & ) FABRICATION, RYLOCK COMPANY, ) 27 SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR, ) VANGUARD and DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) 28 ) Collins Collins 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16) Muir + Stewart LLP 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1700 1 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone (510) 844-5100 MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN Fax (510) 844-5101

1 . ) ______) 2 WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, ) 3 ) Cross-Complainant, ) 4 ) vs. ) 5 ) ROES 1 – 500, inclusive, ) 6 ) 7 Cross-Defendants. ) ) 8 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant JELD- 9 WEN, INC. dba SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR 10 RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant 11 MCLARAND, VASQUEZ AND PARTNERS, INC. 12 SET NO.: ONE (1) 13 TO JELD-WEN, INC. AND TO THEIR ATTORNEY(S) OF RECORD HEREIN: 14 COMES NOW Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant MCLARAND, VASQUEZ 15 AND PARTNERS, INC. (“Responding Party”) and hereby responds to Defendant/Cross- 16 Defendant/Cross-Complainant JELD-WEN, INC. dba SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR’s 17 (“Propounding Party”) Request for Admissions, Set One, as follows: 18 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 19 The following responses are made solely for the purpose of this action. Each is subject 20 to all appropriate objections which would require the exclusion of any statement contained herein, if 21 the Request for Admission were propounded, or if the answer were made by, a witness present and 22 testifying in court. All such objections and grounds are reserved and may be interposed at the time of 23 trial. 24 This Responding Party has not yet completed its investigation of the facts related to this action, 25 and has not yet completed its in this action, and consequently has not yet completed its 26 preparation for trial. The following responses are given without prejudice to the right to produce at 27 trial any and all subsequently-discovered relating to the proof of presently known material 28 facts, if any, and to produce all evidence, whenever discovered, relating to the proof of subsequently- Collins Collins 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16) Muir + Stewart LLP 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1700 2 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone (510) 844-5100 MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN Fax (510) 844-5101

1 discovered material facts. Responding party responds to these Requests for Admission based upon the 2 information and belief presently known and available to the Responding Party and reserves the right to 3 supplement or modify these responses based upon subsequently discovered or acquired information 4 and/or documents. 5 Except for explicit facts submitted herein, no admissions of any nature whatsoever are implied 6 nor should they be inferred. The fact that Responding Party has responded to any Request for

7 Admission should not be taken as an admission or acceptance of the existence of any fact or facts set

8 forth or assumed by any interrogatory, or that such answer constitutes admissible evidence. This

9 Preliminary Statement is, by this reference, incorporated into each and every one of the following

10 Responses to these Requests for Admission.

11 RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

12 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:

13 Admit the PLANS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any windows detailed

14 therein.

15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:

16 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

17 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

18 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert

19 opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING 20 PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition. 21 Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows: 22 RESPONDING PARTY is unable to admit or deny this Request because 23 PROPOPOUNDING PARTY’s definition of “PLANS” is not a complete representation of the 24 Contract Documents. A MILCOR TRIM, as defined in PROPOUNDING PARTY’s Request, is not 25 called out in the “PLANS,” as defined. However, the “PLANS,” as defined, do not include all the 26 documents and instructions that make up the Contract Documents, and are not representative of 27 how this portion of the Project was to be constructed. 28 Collins Collins 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16) Muir + Stewart LLP 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1700 3 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone (510) 844-5100 MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN Fax (510) 844-5101

1 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2 2 Admit the SPECIFICIATIONS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any windows 3 detailed therein. 4 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2 5 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information 6 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

7 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert

8 opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as

9 defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING

10 PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition.

11 Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

12 Deny.

13 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS NO. 3

14 Admit the PLANS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any sliding glass patio doors

15 detailed therein.

16 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 3

17 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

18 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert 19 opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as 20 defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING 21 PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition. 22 Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows: 23 RESPONDING PARTY is unable to admit or deny this Request because 24 PROPOPOUNDING PARTY’s definition of “PLANS” is not a complete representation of the 25 Contract Documents. A MILCOR TRIM, as defined in PROPOUNDING PARTY’s Request, is not 26 called out in the “PLANS,” as defined. However, the “PLANS,” as defined, do not include all the 27

28 Collins Collins 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16) Muir + Stewart LLP 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1700 4 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone (510) 844-5100 MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN Fax (510) 844-5101

1 documents and instructions that make up the Contract Documents, and are not representative of 2 how this portion of the Project was to be constructed. 3 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4 4 Admit the SPECIFICATIONS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any sliding glass 5 patio doors detailed therein. 6 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4

7 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

8 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

9 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert

10 opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as

11 defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING

12 PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition.

13 Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

14 Deny.

15 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 5

16 Admit the PLANS call for aluminum windows and sliding glass patio doors.

17 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 5

18 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is 19 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible 20 expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing 21 objections, Responding Party responds as follows: 22 RESPONDING PARTY is unable to admit or deny this Request because 23 PROPOPOUNDING PARTY’s definition of “PLANS” is not a complete representation of the 24 Contract Documents. Aluminum windows and sliding glass patio doors are called out in the 25 “PLANS,” as defined. However, the “PLANS,” as defined, do not include all the documents and 26 instructions that make up the Contract Documents, and are not representative of what the contract 27 documents called for in this regard. 28 Collins Collins 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16) Muir + Stewart LLP 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1700 5 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone (510) 844-5100 MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN Fax (510) 844-5101

1 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 6 2 Admit the SPECIFICATIONS call for aluminum windows and sliding glass patio doors. 3 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 6 4 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information 5 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is 6 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible

7 expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing

8 objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

9 Deny.

10 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 7

11 Admit YOU never revised the PLANS to reflect the change in materials from aluminum to

12 vinyl window and sliding glass patio door products.

13 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 7

14 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

15 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

16 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible

17 expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing

18 objections, Responding Party responds as follows: Deny. 19 REQUEST TO ADMISSION NO. 8 20 Admit YOU never revised the SPECIFICATIONS to reflect the change in materials from 21 aluminum to vinyl window and sliding glass patio door products. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Collins Collins 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16) Muir + Stewart LLP 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1700 6 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone (510) 844-5100 MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN Fax (510) 844-5101

1 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 8 2 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information 3 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is 4 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible 5 expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing 6 objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

7 Deny.

8 DATED: March 8, 2016 COLLINS COLLINS MUIR + STEWART LLP 9

10 11 By: ______

12 SAMUEL J. MUIR Attorneys for McLARAND VASQUEZ & 13 PARTNERS, INC.

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Collins Collins 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16) Muir + Stewart LLP 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1700 7 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone (510) 844-5100 MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN Fax (510) 844-5101

VERIFICATION TO FOLLOW UNDER SEPARATE COVER

PROOF OF SERVICE (CCP §§ 1013(a) and 2015.5; FRCP 5)

State of California, ) ) ss. County of Alameda )

I am employed in the County of Alameda. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1700, Oakland, California 94612.

On the below date, I served the foregoing document described as McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC.’S RESPONSES TO SPECIAL , SET ONE, PROPOUNDED BY JELD-WEN, INC.; McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC.’S RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, PROPOUNDED BY JELD-WEN, INC. on the interested parties in this action by placing same in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

See Service List Attached Hereto

(BY MAIL) - I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail in Oakland, California to be served on the parties as indicated on the attached service list. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Oakland, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

(BY CERTIFIED MAIL) – I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to be placed in the United States Mail in Oakland, California.

BY EXPRESS MAIL OR ANOTHER METHOD OF DELIVERY PROVIDING FOR OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

(BY ELECTRONIC FILING AND/OR SERVICE) – I filed and served a true copy, with all exhibits, electronically on designated recipients listed on the attached Service List via 03/08/16 (Date) at a.m. (Time) Glotrans, per E-Filing and E-Service Standing Order of 08/28/06, on:

FEDERAL EXPRESS - I caused the envelope to be delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized to receive documents with delivery fees provided for.

(BY FACSIMILE) - I caused the above-described document(s) to be transmitted to the offices of the interested parties at the facsimile number(s) indicated on the attached Service List and the activity report(s) generated by facsimile number (510) 844-5100 indicated all pages were transmitted.

(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) - I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand to the office(s) of the addressee(s).

Executed on MARCH 8, 2016 at Oakland, California.

(STATE) - I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.

(FEDERAL) - I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made.

PAM KASSOFF [email protected]

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; CASE NO. 1-13-CV-258281 CILKER APARTMENTS v. WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, et al OUR FILE NO. 19010

Jon B. Zimmerman Michael J. Pepek Gregory B. Cohen Sam M. Danskin ROBINSON & WOOD Michael A. Erlinger 227 N. 1st Street GREEN & HALL APC San Jose, CA 95113 1851 E. 1ST Street, 10th Floor (408) 298-7120 – FAX (408) 298-0477 Santa Ana, CA 92705 [email protected] (714) 918-7000 – FAX (714) 918-6996 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR CILKER [email protected] APARTMENTS, LLC [email protected] Sheila Ellis [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANT WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION; JOHN ATHERTON

David Levy Laura K. Buttrell, Esq VAN DE POEL, LEVY & ALLEN, LLP LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A WALLIS 1600 South Main Plaza, Suite 325 2251 Harvard, Suite 100 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Sacramento, CA 95815 (925) 934-6102 – FAX (925) 934-6060 (916) 921-9353 – FAX (916) 921-9040 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT LDI MECHANICAL, INC. ATTORNEY(S) FOR ROBECKS WELDING & FABRICATION, (sued herein as LDI) INC.

Michael L. Marx Richard N. Sieving, Esq. Denise R. Sutherland Luke G. Pears-Dickson, Esq. GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP THE SIEVING LAW FIRM, APC 417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor 100 Howe Street, Suite #220N San Francisco, CA 94104 Sacramento, CA 95825 (415) 705-0400 – FAX (415) 705-0411 (916) 444-3366 – FAX (916) 444-1223 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR JOSEPH J. ALBANESE, INC ATTORNEY(S) FOR JELD-WEN, INC. , AN OREGON CORPORATION DBA SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR (ERRONEOUSLY SUED HEREIN AS SEPARATE ENTITIES SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR AND DOE 3: JELD- WEN, INC. DBA SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR

Chad S. Tapp, Esq. Frank J. Perretta, Esq. Cruz Rocha, Esq. MILLER MORTON CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP PORTER SCOTT 50 West San Fernando St., Suite 1300 350 University Ave., Suite 200 San Jose, California 95113 Sacramento, California 95825 (408) 292-1765; Fax: (408) 436-8272 (916) 929.1481 - FAX: (916) 927.3706 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT, CROSS- [email protected] COMPLAINANT, WHITE RESIDENTIAL, INC. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS dba ANDERSON TRUSS

Eileen T. Booth Jenna L. Fischer-Reyes Crystal W. Leas LAW OFFICES OF MELISSA M. BALLARD JACOBSEN & McELROY PC 1551 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 830 2401 American River Drive, Suite 100 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Sacramento, CA 95825 (714) 571-0407 – FAX (877) 369-5799 (916) 971-4100 – FAX (916) 971-4150 Direct: (714) 371-2758 [email protected] Mailing Address: [email protected] P.O. Box 2282 ATTORNEY(S) FOR PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS Brea, CA 92822-2282 dba ANDERSON TRUSS (erroneously sued herein as ANDERSON [email protected] TRUSS; ROE 4; DOE 4) ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT ROBECK’S WELDING & FABRICATION, INC.

Michael J. Estep Maria M. Rohaidy LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY R. WAGNER Alison S. Flowers 1655 Grant Street, Suite 800-B TAUBMAN, SIMPSON, YOUNG & SULENTOR APC Concord, CA 94520 One World Trade Center, Suite 400 (925) 681-3600 – FAX (866) 386-1186 Long Beach, CA 90831-0400 [email protected] (562) 436-9201 – FAX (562) 590-9695 ATTORNEY(S) FOR PYRAMID BUILDERS, INC. [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR AMPAM PARKS MECHANICAL, INC.

Jill J. Lifter G. Geoffrey Wood Joseph Ryan Jenn N. Crittondon RYAN & LIFTER APC ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 One Concord Center San Ramon, CA 94583-1367 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 350 (925) 884-2080 – FAX 884-2090 Concord, CA 94520-2145 [email protected] (510) 832-7770 – FAX (510) 832-0102 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR CELL-CRETE CORPORATION [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DIMETRIUS PAINTING II, INC. (ROE 11)

Thomas R. Kirvin Daniel A. Serot LAW OFFICES OF SANTANA, TCHENG, VIERRA & SYMONDS VAN DE POEL, LEVY, ALLEN & ARNEAL, LLP 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 700 1600 South Main Plaza, Suite 325 San Francisco, CA 94105 Walnut, Creek, CA 94596 (415) 777-1308 – FAX (415) 896-9063 (925) 934-6102 – FAX (925) 934-6060 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA CLASSIC ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT ADM PAVER DESIGNS, INC., a dissolved California corporation, CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. incorrectly sued as CALIFORNIA CLASSIC PAVERS, and Defendant-in-, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Thomas B. Wait Robert B. Luceck Robert A. Hufnagel Alexander R. Moore Matthew P. Malczynski BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE WAIT & HUFNAGEL A Professional Corporation 250 West First Street, Suite 222 555 12th Street, Suite 1800 Claremont, CA 91711 Oakland, CA 94607 (909) 621-5672 – FAX (909) 399-0645 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT MADERA FRAMING, INC. [email protected] (erroneously sued as Madera Framing) [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT TARA COATINGS, INC. (erroneously sued herein as TARA COATINGS)

Leonard T. Fink Benjamin J. Angulo Rebecca J. Collaco SPRINGEL & FINK LLP Brian H. Gunn 575 Market Street, Suite 2200 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP San Francisco, CA 94105 2175 California Blvd., Suite 645 (415) 541-5363 – FAX (415) 541-5364 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3502 [email protected] (925) 280-0004 – FAX (925) 280-0005 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT COURTNEY, INC., [email protected] erroneously sued and served as COURTNEY WATERPROOFING, ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT ALLIANCE BUILDING INC. PRODUCTS, INC.

Todd A. Jones Larry D. Letofsky Gregory K. Federico Robyn S. McClain ARCHER NORRIS APLC LETOFSKY – McCLAIN 301 University Avenue, Suite 110 3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95825-5537 San Diego, CA 92122 (916) 646-2480 – FAX (916) 646-5696 (858) 642-1372 – FAX: (858) 642-1379 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT CO-COUNSEL FOR AMPAM PARKS MECHANICAL, INC. ROBECK’S WELDING & FABRICATION, INC.

SPECIAL MASTER / DISCOVERY REFEREE: DOCUMENT DEPOSITORY: Gerald Kurland, Esq. Aiken & Welch JAMS/ADR 111 N. Market Street 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 370S San Jose, CA 95113 Santa Monica, CA 90404 (877) 451-1580 (310) 392-3044 – FAX (310) 396-7576 [email protected]

Joseph A. Long, Esq. Thomas Yen, Esq. Marcia A. Pollioni, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL POLLARD LONG BLUMBERG, LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 2850 2950 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 315 San Francisco, CA 94105 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (415) 227-2300 – FAX (415) 227-2360 (925) 941-0090 – FAX (925) 941-0085 [email protected] Pollioni Cell: (415) 730-0072 (Preferred) ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT CASEY-FOGLI [email protected] CONCRETE CONTRACTORS; CASEY-FOGLI [email protected] CONTRACTORS, INC. ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT LOS NIETOS CONSTRUCTION

William D. Morrow Chad S. Tapp Geoffrey Kraemer PORTER SCOTT MORROW & WHITE 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 535 Anton Blvd., Suite 1150 Sacramento, CA 95825 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (916) 929-1481 – FAX (916) 927-3706 (714) 979-7999 – FAX (714) 979-7770 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR PACIFIC COAST BUILDING [email protected] PRODUCTS dba ANDERSON TRUSS (erroneously sued herein [email protected] as ANDERSON TRUSS; ROE 4; DOE 4) [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR ADM CONSTRUCTION

Ayhan M. Menekshe Brett L. McKague Steven W. Ferla Jeremy Schroeder MENEKSHE LAW FIRM FLESHER / McKAGUE LLP 950 East Campbell Avenue 2202 Plaza Drive Campbell, CA 95008 Rocklin, CA 95764 (408) 358-1200 – FAX (408) 358-1205 (916) 3589042 – FAX (916) 673-9672 [email protected] [email protected] ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS- [email protected] DEFENDANT CELL-CRETE CORPORATION ATTORNEY(S) FOR GENTRY ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS

Todd A. Fischer Bryan P. Kerney, Esq. FISCHER KERNEY, LLP 888 Munras Avenue Monterey, CA 93940 (831) 372-9200 – FAX (831) 372-9220 [email protected] [email protected] CO-COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT PYRAMID BUILDERS, INC.

Elizabeth W. Lawley, Esq. Frank J. Perretta, Esq. HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP MILLER, MORTON, CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP 2485 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 450 50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1300 Sacramento, CA 95833 San Jose, CA 95113 (916) 702-3200; Fax: (916) 702-3220 (408) 292-1765 – FAX (408) 436-8272 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT MADERA FRAMING, INC. ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT/CROSS- (erroneously sued as Madera Framing) COMPLAINANT WHITE RESIDENTIAL, INC.

Mary Kay Glaspy, Esq. Paul C. Glaspy, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF GLASPY & GLASPY, INC. LAW OFFICES OF GLASPY & GLASPY, INC. One Walnut Creek Center 1550 The Alameda, Suite 200 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 750 San Jose, CA 95126 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (408) 279-8844 – FAX (408) 279-6941 (925) 947-1300 – FAX (925) 947-1594 [email protected] [email protected] ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR WESTERN NATIONAL ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION

Leonard T. Fink, Esq. Mark C. Phillips, Esq. Kathryn L. Kim, Esq. KRAMER, deBOER & KEANE, LLP SPRINGEL & FINK LLP 425 Market Street, Suite 2200 18100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94105 Irvine, CA 92612 (415) 933-7855 – FAX (415) 933-7850 (714) 957-5742 – FAX (714) 957-5762 [email protected] [email protected] ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT PYRAMID BUILDERS, [email protected] INC. ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT COURTNEY, INC., erroneously sued and served as COURTNEY WATERPROOFING, INC.