DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Storage, Electric Vehicles & EV Charging

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Storage, Electric Vehicles & EV Charging Energy Storage, Electric Vehicles & EV Charging 21st Century Strategic Direction Comprehensive Study and Key Considerations March 31, 2020 Prepared For Fayetteville PWC Officers and Commissioners Prepared By Fayetteville PWC Development & Marketing NC Clean Energy Technology Center, NCSU Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles: Detailed Report Page | 0 The following individuals provided research and/or contributed content to this document: Fayetteville Public Works Commission, Development & Marketing Kathy Miller, Marketing Manager Maureen O’Connor, Market Planning Specialist Josie Titus, Customer Programs Analyst Janelle Rockett, Key Accounts Agent Kimberly Rodriguez, Key Accounts Agent North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center, NCSU Heather Brutz, Clean Transportation Finance and Operations Manager Kimberly Conley, Project Manager Qinling Li, Duke University, Master's Environmental Management '19 Isaac Panzarella, P.E., Assistant Director for Technical Services Autumn Proudlove, Senior Manager of Policy Research Danny Sodano, NC State University, Student, Master's Environmental Engineering '20 Ted Spencer, Senior Extension Specialist Alexander Yoshizumi, NC State University, Student, Ph.D. Geospatial Analytics '22 This document is intended for PWC Chief Officers and PWC Commission to provide information and share key elements for consideration. Although the information and materials are carefully prepared and are believed to be reliable and accurate, the Fayetteville Public Works Commission (PWC) and the North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (NCCETC) do not accept any legal responsibility for the contents herein or for any consequences, including direct or indirect liability, arising from reliance on the information or use thereof. The information set forth in this document may be revised or withdrawn at any time without prior notice. In no event shall PWC, its employees, officers, or commissioners be liable for any direct, indirect or incidental damages, injury, loss, costs or expenses related to reliance on the information provided or its use, however caused, including but not limited to, special or consequential damages, lost revenue, business interruption, lost or damaged data or any other commercial or economic loss howsoever caused irrespective of whether PWC is advised of the possibility of such damages, injury, loss, cost or expense. PWC does not provide any legal advice and users of the information should consult with their own lawyer for legal advice. The information contained herein does not have the force of law. In the event of a conflict between this information and any applicable legislation or regulation which may apply, the relevant law prevails. Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles: Detailed Report Page | 1 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................... 4 • Process • Current Situation • Drivers of Transformation • Key Considerations for Strategic Direction Detailed Report - Energy Storage ................................................ 11 • Energy Storage Applications and Services • Lithium-Ion Batteries • Water Heater Storage • Ice Storage • What is Duke Doing? • Policy and Contractual Obligations • Grid Impact • Codes and Standards • Incentives • Tariffs Detailed Report - Electric Vehicles and EV Charging .................... 29 • Current Status and Market Trends • Electric Vehicle Models Available in North Carolina • Local Dealership Information • Cost to Own and Operate an Electric Vehicle • Electric Vehicle Charging • Electric Vehicle Readiness in North Carolina • What is Duke Doing? • What are the North Carolina Cooperatives Doing? • Electric Fleets & Buses • Policy and Contractual Obligation • Grid Impact • Incentives • Tariffs • Load Profile Study Design Recommendations Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles: Detailed Report Page | 2 Appendix of Supporting Documents • Appendix 1: Butler Farm Microgrid, SREMC 2020 • Appendix 2: North Carolina Battery Storage Installations, Collected by NCCETC, 2019 • Appendix 3: CALMAC/Trane Ice Storage Estimation, Mark Johnson, CALMAC Portfolio of Ingersoll Rand, December 2019 • Appendix 4: North Carolina and Federal Regulatory Activity, Collected by NCCETC, 2020 • Appendix 5: North Carolina Municipal Rate Structures, Collected by NCCETC, October 2019 • Appendix 6: EV/EV Charging Rebates and Incentives, Collected by NCCETC, November 2019 • Appendix 7: Pilot Programs of EV Managed Charging, 2020 • Appendix 8: Other Residential EV Rates, Collected by NCCETC, 2019 • Appendix 9: Non-Residential EV Rates, Collected by NCCETC, 2019 • Appendix 10: Data Collection, Collected by NCCETC, 2020 • Appendix 11: Education & Marketing EVs Referenced Sources Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles: Detailed Report Page | 3 Executive Summary Process In the preparation of this document, Fayetteville Public Works Commission (PWC) Development & Marketing created an open and inclusive process to engage community stakeholders and industry experts. Participants included subject matter experts from Sustainable Sandhills, local car dealerships, North Carolina Auto Dealers Association (NCADA), ElectriCities of North Carolina, Plug-In NC, energy storage vendors, community leaders, internal authorities, and customers. The North Carolina Clean Energy Technology Center (NCCETC) assisted with written content and research. Research from the NC Clean Energy Plan, NC ZEV Plan, and Motor Fleet ZEV Plan completed in October 2019 as directed by NC Executive Order No. 80 and Energy Storage Options for North Carolina completed November 2018 tasked under House Bill 589 were used as technical references. American Public Power Association (APPA) Electric Vehicle Blueprint for Your Community Public Power Strategies produced 2018, APPA Behind-the-Meter Energy Storage produced 2019, and APPA Getting Involved in Fleet Electrification produced November 2019 provided examples of factors, programs, and resources to consider. Current Situation PWC understands the value of storage technology and has led the way with the recent installation of the first municipally owned solar/battery storage site in North Carolina. While solar doesn’t operate at its peak capacity during coincident peak (CP) hours, an effectively managed battery can provide CP capacity at its rated nameplate capacity. To date, the PWC output summary from the 1 MWAC solar/ 500kWAC battery site is as follows: Butler Warner Generation Plant Community Solar & Battery Storage Panel CP Battery Battery CP CP Day/Hr. Month Panel kWh kW kWh kW 9/12 @1700 Battery controls not Sep-19 120,913 440 -2,849 -4 complete 10/3 @1600 Battery controls not Oct-19 122,810 584 -1,208 -6 complete Nov-19 108,053 1 -2,980 248 11/14@0700 260 kW module inoperable Dec-19 92,399 11 -3,752 480 12/20 @0800 Jan-20 101,157 12 -3,954 499 1/22@0800 Feb-20 111,324 58 -3,965 499 2/22@0800 Adding storage capacity to the PWC distribution grid makes economic sense; however, PWC is bound by a full-requirements Power Supply and Coordination Agreement (PSA) with Duke Energy Progress (DEP). The current PSA allows PWC to install, own and operate up to 2 megawatts (MW) battery storage together with a solar facility to store and discharge the solar energy. Energy storage ownership benefits not only PWC but also customers when rates are designed to reflect the hourly and seasonal variability of the cost of electric service. Pricing that reflects actual cost variability encourages customers to efficiently time their electricity use. DEP’s PSA does not limit PWC’s ability to design rates that send a price signal to encourage customer response, nor does it limit demand response activities; yet, it does limit signaling a customer and it appears to limit a Energy Storage and Electric Vehicles: Detailed Report Page | 4 customer’s ability to export to the grid. Commercial and industrial customers who value renewable procurement, heightened reliability with back-up generation, electrification of fleet services, and demand response storage systems could take advantage of tariff offerings to meet their needs and/or environmental goals. Residential customers who desire a plug-in electric vehicle (EV) or want to pair their rooftop solar with battery storage may also see advantages from rates that reflect the variable cost of energy. Variable rates can offer benefit to individual customers without requiring subsidization from non-participating customers, if correctly structured. Across the state, utility-scale energy storage development is expected to rise quickly. Since 2011, investor owned, municipal and cooperative utilities in NC have installed 2,287 kW of battery storage capacity. The 2018 latest Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) filed by NC investor owned utilities (IOUs) indicated that the capacity of IOU operated energy storage is planned to increase from the current level of 1 MW to 246 MW by 2025 (NCDEQ 2019). Likewise, state-wide EV sales are expected to exceed 80,000 electric and hybrid vehicles in the next five years. In contrast to these trends, there has been little interest in behind-the-meter (BTM) energy storage or EVs in this service territory despite the rate variability offered by our current retail time-of- use and coincident peak rates. Some of the larger industrial customers are considering peak shaving Tier IV compliant diesel generation assets but have not approached PWC about energy storage options. According to local area auto dealers, the penetration of EVs in this area is extremely low. In Fayetteville, the sale of plug-in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electric Vehicle Charger Selection Guide
    Electric Vehicle Charger Selection Guide Acknowledgments This guide was made possible through the generous support of many organizations. Funding was provided by California Energy Commission grants CEC-ARV-14-046 and CEC-ARV-14-058, as well as financial support from the City of Mount Shasta and the Siskiyou County Economic Development Council. Without hard work from the following representatives of the Redwood Coast Energy Authority, the Schatz Energy Research Center, the Local Government Commission/Civic Spark, and the Siskiyou County Economic Development Council, this guide would not exist: Redwood Cost Energy Authority: Schatz Energy Research Center Dana Boudreau Jerome Carman Pierce Schwalb Andrew Harris Lori Biondini Greg Chapman Allison Campbell Kristen Radecsky Lexie Fischer Jim Zoellick Matthew Marshall Ben Winker Local Government Commission/Civic Spark Siskiyou County Economic Development Council Amanda Le Logan Smith Disclaimers This report was collaboratively prepared by multiple California government and non-profit agencies as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the State of California. No agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Plug-In Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Guidelines for Multi
    November 2013 PPlug-inlug-in EElectriclectric VVehicleehicle CChargingharging IInfrastructurenfrastructure GGuidelinesuidelines fforor MMulti-unitulti-unit DDwellingswellings This report was developed by the California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative, a multi-stakeholder partnership working to ensure a strong and enduring transition to a plug-in electric vehicle marketplace. Members played guiding and consulting roles in developing this report, although individual organizations may not formally endorse every aspect or recommendation. The PEV Collaborative would like to thank Joel Pointon of San Diego Gas & Electric and Karen Schkolnick of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District for their leadership role as co-chairs of the Multi-unit Dwellings Working Group. This report was developed by the Working Group co-chairs, volunteers of the Working Group, PEV Collaborative staff, and contractors Clean Fuel Connection, Inc., J Knapp Communications, Better World Group, Inc., and Winter Graphics. Special thanks to Bill Boyce of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, the multi-unit dwellings that provided case studies, and Lisa Chiladakis, lead PEV Collaborative staff. California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative Carla Peterman, 2013-2014 Chairman Christine Kehoe, Executive Director California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative AeroVironment ChargePoint Nissan North America, Inc. Robert Barrosa Richard Lowenthal Tracy Woodard American Lung Association in California Clean Fuel
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Charging Station Installation with Energy Efficiency Upgrades
    ELECTRI International—The Foundation for Electrical Construction, Inc. NEW BUSINESS SECTOR Combining Charging Station Installation with Energy Efficiency Upgrades: An Emerging Market California Polytechnic State University Lonny Simonian, PE Dr. Thomas Korman, PE David Phillips ELECTRI International The Foundation for Electrical Construction, Inc. Combining Charging Station Installation with Energy Efficiency Upgrades: An Emerging Market California Polytechnic State University Lonny Simonian, PE Dr. Thomas Korman, PE David Phillips ELECTRI Council ELECTRI International—The Foundation for Electrical Construction, Inc. As of June 2012 PRESIDENT’S COUNSEL Jerrold H. Nixon, d. ELECTRI Council 1995–2009 $1,000,000 or more Eric F. Nixon Hugh D. ‘Buz’ Allison, d. ELECTRI Council 1995-2011 Maron Electric Co., Illinois Hugh D. ‘Buz’ and Irene E. ‘Betty’ Allison Trust, Washington NECA Chapters and Affiliates Richard W. McBride* Chicago & Cook County The Richard W. and Darlene Y. McBride Trust, California New York City* Albert G. Wendt* Northeastern Illinois Cannon & Wendt Electric Company Northern California Al and Margaret Wendt Trust, Arizona Northern Indiana Puget Sound National Electrical Contractors Association* Southeastern Michigan* Square D/Schneider Electric Western Pennsylvania PROGRAM GUARANTOR Manufacturers $500,000 or more Eaton Electrical Electrical Contractors Trust of Alameda County Thomas & Betts Corporation McCormick Systems GOVERNORS The Okonite Company $150,000 or more Contractors DIPLOMAT $350,000 or more Arthur Ashley Ferndale Electric Co., Michigan Contractors Stephen Bender Timothy McBride Bana Electric Corporation, New York Southern Contracting Company, California Brian Christopher Oregon City, Oregon NECA Chapters and Affiliates Larry Cogburn Boston Chapter Ron L. Cogburn San Diego County Chapter Cogburn Bros. Electric, Inc., Florida Manufacturers and Distributors Rex A.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicles: Are You Ready for the New Load?
    Electric Vehicles: Are You Ready for the New Load? APPA National Conference James Ellis New Orleans Senior Director Utility Solutions ChargePoint, Inc. June© 2018 18, ChargePoint, 2018 Inc. | Proprietary and Confidential | Do Not Distribute james ellis@chargepoint com Contents 1. Who is ChargePoint? 2. Utility EV Primer 3. Market Snapshot 4. Utility EV Readiness © 2018 ChargePoint, Inc. Who is ChargePoint? © 2018 ChargePoint, Inc. ChargePoint: The World’s Largest and Most Open Smart EV Charging Network Market Environmental Category Industry Superior Services Leadership Impact Leadership Recognition and Support + 5,000+ customers + Avoided >39 million + Founded 2007 + 24/7 driver support and + 50,000+ charging gallons of gas, + $300M Invested centralized station spots >124 million kg of + ~500 Employees monitoring CO and >131M kg + 800+ DC fast spots 2 + Partnering with major + Remote diagnosis, of GHG emissions autos, integrated repair and upgrade of + 939 million electric in-vehicle and stations miles driven on navigation systems + Preventative ChargePoint + Dedicated utility and maintenance programs Network policy teams © 2018 ChargePoint, Inc. 5 Our Mission: EV Charging, Everywhere Get everyone behind the wheel of an EV and give them charging wherever they go. Out of Town Home Work Around Town Convenient and connected charging for home, work, around town and out of town. © 2018 ChargePoint, Inc. 6 Stations for Every Situation Single Family Multi-Family, Commercial/Municipal, On-Route, Home Fleet Mixed Use Commercial Home CPF25 CT4000
    [Show full text]
  • The Utility Guide to Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness
    The Utility Guide to Plug-in Electric Vehicle Readiness November 2011 The Utility Guide to Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness November 2011 In collaboration with the Electric Drive Transportation Association © 2011 by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). All rights reserved. Published 2011. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system or method, now known or hereinafter invented or adopted, without the express prior written permission of the Edison Electric Institute. Attribution Notice and Disclaimer This work was prepared by the Edison Electric Institute (EEI). When used as a reference, attribution to EEI is requested. EEI, any member of EEI, and any person acting on their behalf (a) does not make any warranty, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information, advice or recommendations contained in this work, and (b) does not assume and expressly disclaims any liability with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, advice or recommendations contained in this work. The views and opinions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of EEI, any member of EEI.This material and its production, reproduction and distribution by EEI does not imply endorsement of the material. Note: The status of the projects listed in this report was current when submitted to EEI but may have since changed between the time information was initially submitted and date this report was published.
    [Show full text]
  • Plugged In: the Last Mile Who Will Build out and Pay for Electric Vehicle Public Charging Infrastructure?
    Plugged In: The Last Mile Who will build out and pay for electric vehicle public charging infrastructure? Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions Deloitte’s 2012 report, Charging Ahead: The Last Mile and to lower their cost over the next nine years.3 To — Is the U.S. electric infrastructure ready to support accomplish this, the DOE will provide funding to lithium- one million electric vehicles? (Charging Ahead), laid out ion battery makers and loans to automakers to promote the Obama Administration’s initial goal of one million EV development. electric vehicles (EVs) on U.S. roads by 2015, which corresponded with automakers’ launch of new Plug-in Despite the slower-than-anticipated rollout of EVs, many Electric Vehicles (PEVs)1 across the country. Based on participants up and down the EV value chain remain a Deloitte survey and interviews with electric utility steadfast in their assertions that EVs will eventually pick executives and other industry representatives, the report up speed with consumers, fueled by the introduction concluded that the utility infrastructure was prepared to of new models with better range, increasingly higher meet the President’s challenge. gasoline prices, and national security concerns related to dependence on foreign oil imports. In 2012, slightly more than 53,000 EVs were sold,2 a figure that made it increasingly unlikely that the one While the initial Charging Ahead report confirmed that million vehicle target would be reached by 2015. These utilities by and large believe that the utility infrastructure sales figures likely reflect consumers’ concerns regarding is well prepared in the short term, the next questions EV ownership, as outlined in Unplugged: Electric vehicle become, “What can, or should, utilities do to prepare for realities versus consumer expectations (Unplugged).
    [Show full text]
  • The Electric Vehicle Market in the USA
    The Electric Vehicle Market in the USA Finnode Project 2010 Len La Vardera Finpro Stamford Table of Contents Table of Contents Slide Electric Vehicle Market Summary 5 Market Drivers and Challenges 6 - US EV Market Drivers 7-8 - EV Funding 9 - Challenges to EV Transportation 10 - EV Consumer Adoption Barriers 11-12 - US EV Market Forecasts 13 - US EV Market Size Estimates 14 - US EV Penetration 15 EV Market and Players 16 - US Electric Vehicle Players 17 - The EV Value Chain 18 - US EV Market Opportunity Map 19 - The EV Market Map 20 - Battery Electric Vehicles 21 - Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles 22 - Basic EV Types & Performance 23 - Electrification by Manufacturer 24 - US Passenger Vehicle Sales by Technology 25 - Nissan Leaf – US Launch 12/10 26 - Nissan Leaf Market Rollout 27 - Leaf Telematics 28 - Chevrolet (GM) Volt – US Launch 29 - Volt Market Rollout 30 - Volt OnStar Telematics 31 - Ford North America-Announced Electrification Projects 32 US EV Market – Finpro/Finnode 2010 2 Table of Contents (cont‘d) Table of Contents Slide - Ford Focus Market Rollout 33 - Ford Battery Testing 34 - Chrysler Group Electrification Strategy 35 - Toyota Prius PHEV Demo Program 36 - US EV & PHEV Planned Launches 37 - Codes and Standards 38 - EV Technological Advancement 39 - Microsoft Vehicle Software 40- 41 US EV Battery Market 42 - EV and HEV Battery Market 43 - Leading EV, PHEV Battery Manufacturers 44 - Battery Supply Chain 45 - US Advanced Battery Consortium 46 - Battery Standards 47 -48 - Batteries of the Future 49 Government EV Initiatives 50 - Recovery
    [Show full text]