DOCSLIB.ORG

The London School of Economics and Political Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London School of Economics and Political Science The London School of Economics and Political Science Policing the Past: Transitional Justice and the Special Prosecutor’s Office in Mexico, 2000-2006 Javier Trevino-Rangel A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociology of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2012 Declaration 2 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 99,859 words. I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Susannah Wight. Abstract 3 Abstract This thesis looks at how Mexico’s new democratic regime led by President Vicente Fox (2000–2006) faced past state crimes perpetrated during the Institutional Revolutionary Party’s (PRI’s) seventy-year authoritarian rule (1929–2000). To test the new regime’s democratic viability, Fox’s administration had to settle accounts with the PRI for the abuses the party had perpetrated in the past, but without upsetting it in order to preserve the stability of the new regime. The PRI was still a powerful political force and could challenge Fox’s efforts to democratise the country. Hence, this thesis offers an explanation of the factors that facilitated the emergence of Mexico’s ‘transitional justice’ process without putting at risk Fox’s relationship with the PRI elite. This thesis is framed by a cluster of literature on transitional justice which follows a social-constructivist approach and it is supported by exhaustive documentary research, which I carried out for six years in public and private archives. This thesis argues that Fox established a Special Prosecutor’s Office (SPO) as he sought to conduct ‘transitional justice’ through the existing structures of power: laws and institutions (e.g., the General Attorney’s Office) administered by members of the previous regime. So, Fox opted to face past abuses but left the task in the hands of the institutions whose members had carried out the crimes or did nothing to prevent them. The PRI rapidly accepted the establishment of the SPO because the most relevant prosecutorial strategy to come to terms with the PRI was arranged by the PRI’s own elite during the authoritarian era – prosecutorial strategy that led to impunity. In this process, the language of human rights played a decisive role as it framed the SPO’s investigations into the past: it determined the kind of violations that qualified for enquiry and, hence, the type of victims who were counted in the process, which perpetrators would be subject to prosecution, and the authorities that would intervene. Categories of human rights violations (e.g. genocide or forced disappearance) were constructed and manipulated in such a way as to grant a de facto amnesty to perpetrators. Fox was able to preserve the stability of the new regime as his prosecutorial strategies never really threatened the PRI elite. Acknowledgments 4 Acknowledgments My earliest memory of my PhD studies goes back to the induction meeting where the Doctoral Programme Director spoke for the first time to the new students. ‘The PhD is a solitary activity’, he said emphatically. One of the findings of this research was that the PhD is anything but a lonely endeavour. To complete this thesis I depended on many people and incurred countless debts. First, I would like to thank Claire Moon for supervising this research. Simply, this thesis would have not been possible without her. She offered unequivocal and continuous support and encouragement every step of the way – insightful discussions with her stubborn student; she sent references at just the right time; and she made rigorous, meaningful and constructive comments on earlier drafts. She read every chapter thoroughly, backed all my efforts to get funding so I could remain a full-time student, and untiringly motivated me to participate in seminars, conferences, and research groups. A dedicated scholar, she persistently urged me to revise. Her diligent supervision pushed me to challenge my own boundaries. I decided to undertake my doctoral studies at LSE in order to have Claire as my supervisor; it was a decision well made. My research was inspired by four people whose academic work has determined my career. Professor Lorenzo Meyer encouraged my interest in the history of Mexico’s authoritarian regime. Professor Sergio Aguayo taught me about Mexico’s history of abuses. Claire Moon introduced me to the field of transitional justice. They have done whatever they could to see this thesis completed. Finally, Professor Stan Cohen taught me about political crimes, gross human rights violations, and the sociology of denial. I am profoundly grateful to them. The Dorothy Hodgkin Postgraduate Award generously funded the first four years of this research, and Mexico’s National Council on Science and Technology (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, CONACYT) financed the final year. The LSE’s Postgraduate Travel Fund offered important grants, which allowed me to conduct my fieldwork in Mexico. The Department of Sociology at LSE was an exceptional place to study. I am grateful to Claire Alexander and Robin Archer for reading and commenting on chapters of this thesis. They helped me more than they realise. For similar support, I thank my classmates Christian Kroll, Roxana Bratu, David Reubi, Tom McClean, José Luis Álvarez, Olivia Muñoz-Rojas, Simon Dickason, and Sandy Ross. I single out Krisztina Csedo, who has been a constant source of advice. I have also benefitted from the research and opinions of my classmate Peter Manning, Professor Kevin Middlebrook, and journalist Jorge Carrasco Araizaga. Fabián Sánchez granted me access to his files on human rights ONGs in Mexico, and helped me to make sense of the politics of human rights activism in the country. Antonio Garibay guided me through Mexico’s Kafkaesque legal system. Acknowledgments 5 In Mexico, two academic institutions provided a friendly atmosphere where I could finish my writing-up. I am grateful to Professor Gustavo Vega and Dr Fernanda Somuano for accepting me as a visiting research student at El Colegio de México. I also would like to thank the administrative staff of El Colegio for their courtesy and efficiency; I am particularly grateful to Virginia Arellano, Silvia López, Patricia Soto, and Angélica Chávez who helped me with Mexico’s surrealist bureaucracy. At the University of Aguascalientes I am indebted to Ricardo A. López-León, Juanis Zapata, Omar Vázquez, and Alma Rosa Real. I learnt English a few years ago, as an adult, but had a hard time drafting the first chapters of this thesis because of my lack of practice and uncertainty about how to express more complex constructions. Four women came to my rescue and provided instrumental support as I wrote this thesis. Mrs Barbara Crow gave me free English lessons for more than a year before I began the doctoral programme – ‘humanitarian aid’, she called it. For tips on how to present Mexican legal jargon to an English speaking audience I owe much to Alfonsina Peñaloza. A masterful fiction writer, María Lourdes Pallais listened patiently to my ideas on the particular narrative of each chapter. This was important as Mexico’s reality – as Gabriel García Márquez said – is far stranger than any fictional invention. For good recommendations on style I thank the proof-reader of my thesis, Susannah Wight. This was an itinerant thesis, written in three different cities. On my travels, I have benefited from the help and hospitality of Anna Debska, Gisela Calderón, Ceci Dinardi, Esteban Damiani, Julieta González, Tessa Boyd-Cane, and James Seppälä in London; of the Chaverot and Seppälä families in Paris; and of Iván Ramírez, Ana Paula Hernández, Carlos Aguirre, Ana Luisa Liguori, Eugenia Mazzucato, Mario Bronfman and Diana Rubli, Ana Pecova, Diego Antoni, the Prudent-Farjeat family, Doris Arnez, and Georgina Romero in Mexico City. Dr Elizabeth Allison, my psychoanalyst, kept me going. Her stimulus and advice were invaluable. The most important support I have received has come from my friends Angelica Seppälä and Juan Carlos Rosales. They have sustained me in many ways during my doctoral programme and have been more than a family to me. To them my deepest gratitude. Table of Contents 6 Table of Contents DECLARATION........................................................................................................................................ 2 ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................................ 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 9 MEXICO’S ‘TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE’ PROCESS .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    Introduction Where did they come from, the three hundred thousand students that came to the Zócalo the day for the Great Silent Demonstration? . What became of Lourdes? Who was behind the door of Preparatory 1 on the day of the bazookas? How does a generation manufacture myths? What was on the menu in the Political Sciences cafeteria? What was the ’68 Movement protesting? Where did the Juárez-Loreto bus start its run every morning? . Where did they throw our dead? Where, for fuck’s sake, did they throw our dead? —paco ignacio taibo ii, ’68 (1991) Where were you? And you, where were you? And you were where? Where were you and? Where were you? . Where, where, damn, where did you die? Were you on the plaza? Were you in some cor- ridor? Did you live in one of the apartments? Were you coming in from one of the streets? —jorge aguilar mora, Si muero lejos de ti (1979) At the intersection of Mexico City’s Calle Filadelfia and Avenida de los Insurgentes Sur stands a tall and broad-shouldered office tower with a façade of blue reflective glass. It adjoins a complex that includes a shopping mall, a movie theater, and artist David Alfaro Siqueiros’s last major mural. The World Trade Center Mexico City (WTC) is part of an international association that promotes free trade. The administrative offices for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) were once housed there. But in everyday speech and on the placards identifying the destinations of the peseros (microbuses) that crisscross the city the WTC is better known as Hotel de México, a widely publicized hotel project originating in the late 1960s that was never completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus, New Mexico, and Palomas, Chihuahua: Transnational Landscapes of Violence, 1888-1930 Brandon Morgan
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository History ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 9-5-2013 Columbus, New Mexico, and Palomas, Chihuahua: Transnational Landscapes of Violence, 1888-1930 Brandon Morgan Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds Recommended Citation Morgan, Brandon. "Columbus, New Mexico, and Palomas, Chihuahua: Transnational Landscapes of Violence, 1888-1930." (2013). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/56 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in History ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brandon Morgan Candidate History Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Linda B. Hall, Chairperson Samuel Truett Judy Bieber Maria Lane i COLUMBUS, NEW MEXICO, AND PALOMAS CHIHAUAHUA: TRANSNATIONAL LANDSCAPES OF VIOLENCE, 1888-1930 BY BRANDON MORGAN B.A., History and Spanish, Weber State University, 2005 M.A., History, University of New Mexico, 2007 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy History The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July, 2013 ii DEDICATION In memory of Ramón Ramírez Tafoya, chronicler of La Ascensión. For Brent, Nathan, and Paige, who have spent their entire lives thus far with a father constantly working on a dissertation, and especially for Pauline, whose love and support has made the completion of this work possible. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must admit that there were many moments during which I could not imagine that this project would ever reach completion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Venezuela and Mexico
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2017 The Impact of State-Promoted Participation in Democracy and Development: A Comparison of Venezuela and Mexico Domenico Romero The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2328 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Impact of State-Promoted Participation in Democracy and Development: A Comparison of Venezuela and Mexico By Domenico Romero A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2017 © 2017 Domenico Romero All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Kenneth P. Erickson _________________ _______________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee Alyson Cole _________________ _______________________________________ Date Executive Officer Frances Fox Piven Mark Ungar Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract The Impact of State-Promoted Participation in Democracy and Development: A Comparison of Venezuela and Mexico by Domenico Romero Adviser: Professor Kenneth P. Erickson During the past two decades participatory democracy policies came to be seen as a useful alternative to address high inequality and lack of meaningful political representation allowed by clientelist politics in various parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is COMEXUS? B
    Paquete de Bienvenida La beca Fulbright-García Robles y tu estancia en México Comisión México - Estados Unidos para el Intercambio Educativo y Cultural English Teaching Assistantship México, D.F. 2012 Índice de Contenidos I. Comisión México-Estados Unidos para el Intercambio Educativo y Cultural a. What is COMEXUS? b. Programas de beca Fulbright-García Robles c. Estadísticas básicas d. Staff distribution e. Mundo organizacional II. Programa Fulbright a. What it means to be a “Fulbrighter” b. Asociación de Exbecarios Fulbright, EUA c. Fulbright Program Fact Sheet III. Información Cultural a. Welcome to Mexico b. Mexico City and tourist information c. Mexico Fact Sheet IV. Información General a. Teléfonos de emergencia b. Tabla de conversión de medidas c. Comparative Chart of U.S. and Mexican Educational Systems d. The Grading System in Mexico e. ¿Como hacer una llamada telefónica? f. Mensajería y paquetería local, nacional e internacional g. Librerías en México h. Lista parcial de acervos, archivos y bibliotecas en el Distrito Federal i. Aerolíneas y autobuses j. Días de descanso obligatorios y días festivos What is COMEXUS? The U.S.-Mexico Commission for Educational and Cultural Exchange, COMEXUS, was founded on November 27, 1990, in Monterrey, Nuevo León, by means of a bilateral agreement, signed before the presidents of both countries. The goal of the Commission consists of promoting mutual understanding between Mexico and the U nited S tates b y m eans of educational a nd c ultural e xchanges. In ord er t o a chieve t his goal, COMEXUS offers d istinct s cholarship p rograms f or s tudents, r esearchers, u niversity professors, public school teachers and administrators, and professionals of both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Apóstol Del Progreso Apóstol Del Progreso
    Apóstol del progreso Apóstol del progreso Modesto C. Rolland, el progresismo global y la ingeniería en el México posrevolucionario J. Justin Castro Prólogo y traducción de Jorge M. Rolland Constantine Primera edición en inglés, 2019 (University of Nebraska Press) D.R. © 2020, Joseph Justin Castro D.R. © 2020, Jorge Modesto Rolland Constantine, por la traducción, edición y prólogo Traducción: Jorge M. Rolland C. y Marcela Salcido Rolland Coordinación editorial: Sandino Gámez Vázquez Diseño de forros y páginas interiores: Alejandra Barrera Arizmendi isbn 978-970-94317-7-3 Impreso y hecho en México Índice Ilustraciones IX Prólogo XI Agradecimientos XVII Introducción XIX I. Hijo del porfriato, hijo de la periferia 1 II. El revolucionario renuente 23 III. Un progresista mexicano 41 IV. De regreso a la periferia 61 V. Guerra y paz 81 VI. Transiciones 103 VII. Oportunidad y derrota, y la muerte de Virginia Garza de Rolland 119 VIII. Un estadio para Estridentópolis 139 IX. Don Molesto 157 X. El subsecretario 177 XI. A lo grande 193 XII. Fuera de los puertos y hacia las montañas 217 Conclusión. Refexiones fnales sobre la vida y el legado de Modesto Rolland 235 Notas 245 Bibliografía 273 Obras publicadas 275 Ilustraciones 1. Estudiantes en el Colegio Rosales, 1898. 18. Ilustración que representa la frustración 2. Ciudad de México, ca. 1890. de E.U. por la Expedición Punitiva, 1916. 3. Rolland como un joven estudiante 19. Miembros del gabinete y asesores de ingeniería, 1905. cercanos de Venustiano Carranza, 1916. 4. La familia De la Garza, 1908. 20. Ilustración de Nelson Harding, 1916. 5. Retrato de De la Garza en su 21.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Proto-Eugenics in Porfirian Mexico by Christina
    The Rhetoric of Proto-Eugenics in Porfirian Mexico by Christina Margaret Parsons A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2013 Christina Margaret Parsons Abstract This thesis investigates the development of proto-eugenic thought and policy in Porfirian Mexico and how those ideas were important to the Mexican eugenics movement of the twentieth-century. Proto-eugenics is the name given to the ideas of biological and racial improvement developed by leading Mexican thinkers in the late nineteenth-century, until the Mexican Revolution of 1910. Proto-eugenic thought was most concerned with eliminating immoral and degenerate traits that could be passed down from parent to child, and encouraging those with prized traits to have children. Through discussion of writings on criminality and education, this thesis argues that proto-eugenic thought had a large influence on the development of Mexican eugenics in the twentieth-century, and the importance of proto-eugenic thought on nationalism in the Porfiriato. It is important to understand how proto-eugenic science was created in order to investigate the development of eugenic social policy in the twentieth-century. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, Sonya Lipsett-Rivera, for her patience and generosity. You were never too busy to help, and have taught me more than I can describe on this page. Thank you to the professors from whom I took classes, for who I worked, and those who were simply willing to sit down and have a discussion with me.
    [Show full text]