DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosecuting Criminal Immigration Offenses July 2017 Volume 65 Number 4 in This Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prosecuting Criminal Immigration Offenses July 2017 Volume 65 Number 4 in This Issue Prosecuting Criminal Immigration Offenses July 2017 Volume 65 Number 4 In This Issue United States Department of Justice Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Executive Office for By Jeff Sessions, Attorney General of the United States United States Attorneys Washington, DC 20530 Prosecuting 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a): When Your Defendant Resists Monty Wilkinson Removal ................................................................................................................. 3 Director By Dominic Rossetti Contributors’ opinions and statements should not be considered an endorsement by EOUSA for any policy, program, or Using the Alien File in the Prosecution of Immigration Crimes ...................... 11 service. By Sebastian Kielmanovich The United States Attorneys’ Bulletin is published pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.22(b). Prosecuting Illegal Reentry Cases Where Evidentiary Documents Are Missing or Incomplete: Everything You Never Wanted to Know The United States Attorneys’ Bulletin is About A-Files and Removal Documents and Were Not Afraid Not to Ask ..... 17 published bi-monthly by the Executive Office for United States By Louie Uhl Attorneys, Office of Legal Education, 1620 Pendleton Street, Prosecuting Human Rights Violators for Naturalization Fraud: Columbia, South Carolina 29201. HRSP Lessons Learned ........................................................................................ 29 Editor By Christina Giffin, Kathleen O'Connor, and Christian K. Tate Chambers Levesque Assistant Editors Becky Catoe-Aikey Brenda S. Mercer Who’s Afraid of Section 922(g)(5)?: Navigating the Criminal, Civil, and Regulatory Foundation of the Statute for a Successful Prosecution ................ 35 Law Clerks Sarah Tate Chambers By Michael A. Lee Emily Godwin Gurbani Saini Brandy Sanderlin ICE Detention and Pretrial Release: How the Federal Circuit Courts Construe the INA and BRA in Immigration Prosecutions................................ 43 Internet Address By Gregory R. Nyhus https://www.justice.gov/usao/resources /united-states-attorneys-bulletins Send article submissions to A Practical Approach to Prosecuting Passport and Visa Fraud Cases ........... 53 Editor, By Matthew Eltringham United States Attorneys’ Bulletin, National Advocacy Center, Office of Legal Education, Material Witness Issues in Alien Smuggling Cases............................................ 69 1620 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29201. By Serra M. Tsethlikai Cite as: 65 U.S. Attorneys’ Bulletin, July (II) 2017 Collateral Attacks Under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d): A General Overview................. 77 By Erica L. Seger Combatting Transnational Smuggling Organizations: An Introductory Overview................................................................................................................ 85 By Danielle Hickman HSI’s Public Safety Unit: Combatting Immigration Document and Benefit Fraud ..................................................................................................................... 105 By Gregory C. Nevano Stipulated Judicial Removal Orders ................................................................... 111 By Marty D. Ryan and Jonathan S. Needle Prosecuting Criminal Immigration Offenses July 2017 Volume 65 In This Issue . Continued Number 4 B-2 Visitor Visa Fraud: The Investigation and Prosecution of an United States International Business Scheme ............................................................................ 119 Department of Justice By Brian Samuels, Lisa McKeel, and Kevin Hudson Executive Office for United States Attorneys Washington, DC 20530 Notarios and the Unauthorized Practice of Law: A Signature of Fraud .......... 133 By Brea C. Burgie Monty Wilkinson Director Prosecuting Fraudulent Immigrant Smuggling Schemes ................................. 143 Contributors’ opinions and statements should not be considered an endorsement By Angela Scott by EOUSA for any policy, program, or service. The Times They Are A-Changin’: Sentencing in Illegal Reentry Cases and the The United States Attorneys’ Bulletin is published pursuant to November 2016 Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1) ..................................... 153 28 C.F.R. § 0.22(b). By Christina M. Cabanillas The United States Attorneys’ Bulletin is published bi-monthly by the Note from the Editor ............................................................................................ 173 Executive Office for United States Attorneys, By K. Tate Chambers Office of Legal Education, 1620 Pendleton Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. Editor K. Tate Chambers Assistant Editors Becky Catoe-Aikey Brenda S. Mercer Law Clerks Sarah Tate Chambers Emily Godwin Gurbani Saini Brandy Sanderlin Internet Address https://www.justice.gov/usao/resources /united-states-attorneys-bulletins Send article submissions to Editor, United States Attorneys’ Bulletin, National Advocacy Center, Office of Legal Education, 1620 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC 29201. Cite as: 65 U.S. Attorneys’ Bulletin, July (II) 2017 Introduction Jeff Sessions Attorney General of the United States One of the Department’s top priorities is criminal immigration enforcement. Enforcement of our immigration laws is not only a fundamental issue of sovereignty but is essential to ensuring public safety for all Americans. To reinforce this priority, I issued a Memorandum to all federal prosecutors on April 11, 2017, advising them of the Department’s charging practices for criminal immigration offenses and directing each United States Attorney’s Office to designate a Border Security Coordinator to oversee the investigation and prosecution of immigration offenses. Federal prosecutors, together with our law enforcement partners, are uniquely qualified to fulfill the Department’s mission of preventing and combatting crime and seeing that, whenever possible, justice is obtained for victims. To that end, the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Office of Legal Education, has dedicated this issue of the United States Attorneys’ Bulletin to the prosecution of criminal immigration offenses. Subject matter experts from the U.S. Attorney community; the Office of Legal Education; the Criminal Division; the Executive Office for Immigration Review; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms; and our colleagues at the Department of Homeland Security have collaborated to produce a valuable resource that will enable prosecutors and law enforcement to ensure lawfulness in our immigration system. As you know, criminal immigration prosecutions are challenging and oftentimes complicated. The effective investigation and prosecution of criminal immigration offenses requires a thorough familiarity with the Immigration and Nationality Act, the National Firearms Act, the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007, the Controlled Substances Act, and many other statutory provisions pertaining to fraud, human trafficking, national security, and asset forfeiture. Criminal immigration law practitioners are responsible for incorporating a wide variety of legal, forensic, and analytical tools into their investigations and prosecutions. I am grateful that so many of our talented colleagues have dedicated their time and expertise to creating this wide-ranging issue of the United States Attorneys’ Bulletin. Together, we can secure our borders, protect our country from enemies, foreign and domestic, and safeguard the public safety of all Americans. Thank you for all that you do. July (II) 2017 United States Attorneys’ Bulletin 1 Page Intentionally Left Blank 2 United States Attorneys’ Bulletin July (II) 2017 Prosecuting 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a): When Your Defendant Resists Removal Dominic Rossetti Assistant United States Attorney Western District of Louisiana I. Introduction Most of us can recognize 18 U.S.C. § 1343 as the wire fraud statute.1 The same is true for 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) as felon in possession,2 or 8 U.S.C. § 1326 as illegal re-entry.3 These are bread-and-butter charges for federal prosecutors; we see them almost every day. But how many of us can recognize 8 U.S.C. § 1253 for failure to depart?4 Probably not many and with good reason—it takes a rare set of circumstances for this crime to even occur, let alone for it to get charged. Failure to depart makes it a crime for any individual—against whom a valid order of removal is outstanding—to prevent her own departure.5 In other words, once an Immigration Judge (IJ) has ordered someone removed from the United States, this statute criminalizes any action taken by that person that hampers the removal process. In the vast majority of cases, it is nearly impossible for a person to prevent her own removal. Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) removes thousands of people from the United States every year. In 2016, there were 240,255 removals, and more than ninety-five percent of them were removed to just four countries: Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.6 In these cases, HSI transports individuals back to their home countries on contract flights or busses. Sometimes, HSI allows these individuals to voluntarily depart and return to their respective home countries on their own accord. These individuals will never get the chance to hamper the removal process. Some removals, however, are more complicated. For example, when HSI removes a person who came to the United States from overseas, it often does so via commercial flight. The United States is simply not removing enough people to small, faraway
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indian Passport Renewal United States
    Indian Passport Renewal United States Is Hailey transformistic when Sterling grey proficiently? Jean-Luc throws his dentaries mate anamnestically, but slimming Samuele never core so purposefully. Guthrey is prunted and tosses tentatively while hemiopic Vladamir trindling and boggle. We can be cancelled and being only one place of united states passport renewal Please keep apace with your request a passport application center, please consider this country is neither an indian registered application has changed between applications for? Renewing your understanding that will only to leave travel to renew indian consulate to have to indian passport renewal application? Can solve cross Mexico border with birth certificate? 'Six-month passport rule counsel for Indian citizens' The Hindu. Select an emergency please do in united states, new visa interview at least six cities namely washington express or relatives address? Save the reference number generated. Indian embassy understands that you are physically present outside India. What may request for certain cases, but once they check with pending status. British Indian Irish and Israeli citizens residing in the United States and in. We are calling for which also get gc of united states of united states! In addition, to otherwise specifically cited. How old are my children be to apply for better Child Passport? External Affairs Minister Dr. If i travel services only begin once jquery, except canada may be sure you are in other form below is less than a united states? Do you cleanse to send out old passport when renewing? The united states permanently in united states, it with local immigration. To travel by air, you operate not be suspicious with the desired information.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Garifuna of Belize's Toledo District Alexander Gough
    Indigenous identity in a contested land: A study of the Garifuna of Belize’s Toledo district Alexander Gough This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Lancaster University Law School 1 Declaration This thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree at this or any other university. It is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated. Many of the ideas in this thesis were the product of discussion with my supervisors. Alexander Gough, Lancaster University 21st September 2018 2 Abstract The past fifty years has seen a significant shift in the recognition of indigenous peoples within international law. Once conceptualised as the antithesis to European identity, which in turn facilitated colonial ambitions, the recognition of indigenous identity and responding to indigenous peoples’ demands is now a well-established norm within the international legal system. Furthermore, the recognition of this identity can lead to benefits, such as a stake in controlling valuable resources. However, gaining tangible indigenous recognition remains inherently complex. A key reason for this complexity is that gaining successful recognition as being indigenous is highly dependent upon specific regional, national and local circumstances. Belize is an example of a State whose colonial and post-colonial geographies continue to collide, most notably in its southernmost Toledo district. Aside from remaining the subject of a continued territorial claim from the Republic of Guatemala, in recent years Toledo has also been the battleground for the globally renowned indigenous Maya land rights case.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Control in Malaysia: Shifting Toward Internal Enforcement
    Asia-Pacific Social Science Review (2017) 16(3): 46–64 RESEARCH ARTICLE Migration Control in Malaysia: Shifting Toward Internal Enforcement Choo Chin Low and Khairiah Salwa Mokhtar Universiti Sains Malaysia [email protected] Abstract This article examines two aspects of migration control in Malaysia. First, it deals with the question of how the securitization of border control is tied to a wider dynamics of national interest. Based on the notions of “security versus facilities,” this article contextualizes how the institutional sites of governance are frustrated by the open-border policy and a liberal visa policy. Second, the paper argues that internal enforcement is a neglected part of the state’s migration control. As a self-proclaimed country of “zero irregular migrants,” Malaysia has relied heavily on external control: militarizing border crossings and criminalizing irregular migrants through raids, detention, and deportation. The study used a hybrid technique of data collection which integrates elite interviews, official publications, and online news media. The paper highlights a pressing need to formulate a critical approach to internal enforcement. A shift to internal control—identification, surveillance, and employer inspections—is crucial in addressing the root causes of migration, though controlling physical borders is still important. Keywords migration control, border security, interior enforcement, surveillance, Malaysia Border security is an inherent component of the & Schuster, 2005). The border, according to de Genova study of migration control. In debating migration control (2002, p. 436), is “the theater of an enforcement crisis.” measures, there are two schools of thought. Some of the Enforcement at the “revolving door” is critical, as the literature suggests that internal control—deportation, majority of arrests consist of new clandestine entries.
    [Show full text]
  • IMMIGRATION LAW BASICS How Does the United States Immigration System Work?
    IMMIGRATION LAW BASICS How does the United States immigration system work? Multiple agencies are responsible for the execution of immigration laws. o The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) was abolished in 2003. o Department of Homeland Security . USCIS . CBP . ICE . Attorney General’s role o Department of Justice . EOIR . Attorney General’s role o Department of State . Consulates . Secretary of State’s role o Department of Labor . Employment‐related immigration Our laws, while historically pro‐immigration, have become increasingly restrictive and punitive with respect to noncitizens – even those with lawful status. ‐ Pro‐immigration history of our country o First 100 Years: 1776‐1875 ‐ Open door policy. o Act to Encourage Immigration of 1864 ‐ Made employment contracts binding in an effort to recruit foreign labor to work in factories during the Civil War. As some states sought to restrict immigration, the Supreme Court declared state laws regulating immigration unconstitutional. ‐ Some early immigration restrictions included: o Act of March 3, 1875: excluded convicts and prostitutes o Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882: excluded persons from China (repealed in 1943) o Immigration Act of 1891: Established the Bureau of Immigration. Provided for medical and general inspection, and excluded people based on contagious diseases, crimes involving moral turpitude and status as a pauper or polygamist ‐ More big changes to the laws in the early to mid 20th century: o 1903 Amendments: excluded epileptics, insane persons, professional beggars, and anarchists. o Immigration Act of 1907: excluded feeble minded persons, unaccompanied children, people with TB, mental or physical defect that might affect their ability to earn a living.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Citizen Passport Renewal Form
    Us Citizen Passport Renewal Form Land-poor and fleeing Noel often curr some bellpull levelly or licences breast-high. Demosthenis spoon-feeds irrecoverably if dilatable Clayborn enisling or taints. Loutish Armstrong tipping fearlessly or euhemerizing uninterestingly when Randy is perspiratory. That you do you will be charges will be used it receives no passport in the licensed attorney, us citizen passport renewal form birth services on your passport requires that process Who harbor terrorists threats. If oxygen would like me apply reading both a passport and ID card, my need to entertain two appointments, one tool each application. This site uses it using a check or notarized copies of state will be filled on your original photograph in hand with its head has legally document? Citizens Online Passport Application Form Unfortunately if you were proud for passport renewal online then you doing out of luck You want fill. This obligation can are met in false number of ways, such anyone having a parent accompany the applicant, or signing a statement that OKs the passport application. Getting or Renewing a US Passport USAGov. Need your passport quickly? Any portion of amending the renewal passport in your us dollar demand draft. Then, sign the form from your fashion signature. Who collect process passport applications? What fees should therefore pay? How should apply her a passport Department that Foreign Affairs. This rebound is officially called US Passport Renewal Application for Eligible Individuals It my be used by US citizens or non-citizen US nationals who dive to. Passports City of Bloomington MN. Passport Cell DPC Authorized Speed Post Centre SPC or at Citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Perform Surgery on Newborn Intersexed Children? the Phenomenology of the Parental Experience of Having a Child with Intersex Anatomies
    Why do we perform surgery on newborn intersexed children? The phenomenology of the parental experience of having a child with intersex anatomies Kristin Zeiler and Anette Wickström Linköping University Post Print N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article. Original Publication: Kristin Zeiler and Anette Wickström, Why do we perform surgery on newborn intersexed children? The phenomenology of the parental experience of having a child with intersex anatomies, 2009, Feminist Theory, (10), 3, 359-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464700109343258 Copyright: SAGE Publications (UK and US) http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-55527 Why do ‘we’ perform surgery on newborn intersexed children? The phenomenology of the parental experience of having a child with intersex anatomies Kristin Zeiler and Anette Wickström Division of Health and Society Department of Medical and Health Sciences Linköping University Abstract Few parents-to-be consider that their child may be born with ambiguous sex, i.e. external and internal genitals, gonadal structures, sex chromosomes or hormone levels that are not typical only for one sex. Still, parents of a newborn child with ambiguous sex are expected to make a far- reaching decision for the child: should the child be operated upon so that it has either female or male genitals? Surgeries on external genitals are most often not life-saving but aimed at creating genitals that are acceptable to the individual and society. The surgeries have been the target of criticism from patients’ organisations and researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer on Criminal-Immigration and Enforcement Provisions of USCA
    U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021: A Brief Primer on the Criminal-Immigration and Enforcement Provisions1 I. Introduction This primer covers the key criminal-immigration and enforcement provisions of the USCA. The US Citizenship Act of 2021 (USCA, also referred to as the “Biden bill”) is an immigration bill introduced in the House on February 18, 20212 that would create a pathway to citizenship for undocumented people living in the United States who entered on or before January 1, 2021. TPS holders, farmworkers, and people who have DACA or who were eligible for status under the Dream Act would be eligible to become lawful permanent residents immediately. Other undocumented people could apply for a new form of lawful status called “Lawful Provisional Immigrant” (LPI) status. After five years as LPIs, they could then apply to become lawful permanent residents. The bill would also recapture unused visas dating from 1992; make spouses, children, and parents of lawful permanent residents “immediate relatives” (who are immediately eligible for visas and who do not count toward the cap); make anyone waiting more than 10 years immediately eligible for a visa; and increase the per-country limit from 7% to 20% to decrease backlogs. The USCA imposes new criminal bars to eligibility for the legalization program, on top of the already existing inadmissibility bars in current immigration law. It also encourages the construction of a “smart wall” and adds an additional ground for prosecution and penalties under 8 U.S.C. § 1324. The USCA also includes some positive criminal-immigration reforms, including redefining the term “conviction” for immigration purposes, increasing the number of petty offense exceptions 1 Publication of the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild (NIPNLG), 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Younger Lawyers Division Accepting New Members Immigration Law
    Sections and Divisions Left: At the February Happy Hour social: Members of the Section on Taxation Young Tax Lawyers Group enjoy the happy hour social. Younger Lawyers 50 attendees and was held at Carmine’s Infrastructure. The talk was moderated Division Accepting Restaurant in Washington, D.C. The guest by John Wood, attorney, Federal Aviation New Members speaker was Steven Lang, program director Administration. at the Office of Legal Access Programs and The Younger Lawyers Division is now open executive officer for Immigration Review to all members who are age 40 or younger or and U.S. Department of Justice. Section on Taxation who have been admitted less than 10 years! On Feb. 4, 2016, the Section on Taxation If you would like to join the Division, please hosted a live CLE program and webinar contact the Membership Department at Transportation and entitled: “The Research Tax Credit Under [email protected]. Transportation Section 41: Legislative Update and Guide Security Law Section to Claiming and Defending the Credit.” The program featured panelists Warren Payne, Immigration Law On Jan. 10, the Transportation and Trans- senior adviser, Mayer Brown LLP; Alex Section portation Security Law Section held the Sadler, partner, Ivins, Phillips & Barker; and On Jan. 13, the Immigration Law Section 2016 Legislative Update at U.S. Depart- Urvi Doshi Sood, director of tax planning held its monthly Immigration Leadership ment of Transportation Headquarters and senior tax counsel, Lockheed Mar- Luncheon Series. The event included over Conference Center in Washington, D.C. tin Corporation; and was moderated by 40 attendees and was held at Carmine’s Attendees heard from key Transpor- Christine Hooks of Mayer Brown LLP.
    [Show full text]
  • 42Genno44.Pdf
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP Decisions [USCBP 2007–0061; CBP Dec. No. 08–26] RIN 1651–AA69 8 CFR Parts 212 and 235 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Parts 41 and 53 Documents Required for Travelers Departing From or Arriving in the United States at Sea and Land Ports-of-Entry From Within the Western Hemisphere AGENCIES: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the second phase of a joint Depart- ment of Homeland Security and Department of State plan, known as the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, to implement new docu- mentation requirements for U.S. citizens and certain nonimmigrant aliens entering the United States. This final rule details the docu- ments U.S. citizens1 and nonimmigrant citizens of Canada, Ber- muda, and Mexico will be required to present when entering the United States from within the Western Hemisphere at sea and land ports-of-entry. DATES: This final rule is effective on June 1, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Department of Homeland Security: Colleen Manaher, WHTI, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 1 ‘‘U.S. citizens’’ as used in this rule refers to both U.S. citizens and U.S. non-citizen na- tionals. 1 2 CUSTOMS BULLETIN AND DECISIONS, VOL. 42, NO. 44, OCTOBER 23, 2008 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 5.4–D, Washington, DC 20229, telephone number (202) 344–1220. Department of State: Consuelo Pachon, Office of Passport Policy, Planning and Advisory Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs, tele- phone number (202) 663–2662.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Thinking Illegal Entry and Re-Entry
    ARTICLE_2_KELLER.DOCX 11/6/2012 11:19 AM Re-thinking Illegal Entry and Re-entry Doug Keller* This Article traces the history of two federal immigration crimes that have long supplemented the civil immigration system and now make up nearly half of all federal prosecutions: illegal entry and illegal re-entry. Little has been previously written about the historical lineage of either crime, despite the supporting role each has played in enforcing the nation’s civil immigration laws, particularly along the U.S.-Mexico border. This Article takes a critical look at the enforcement of each crime—from when they were initially conceived of as a way to deter illegal immigration, then as a way to target dangerous aliens, and most recently as a means to do both. These shifting strategies, however, have one thing in common: ineffectiveness. Enforcing the crimes has never meaningfully deterred illegal immigration, and the government’s poorly designed proxy to determine whether an alien is “dangerous” has ensured that prosecutions have not made the public safer. The most recent period is particularly troubling—enforcement has led to approximately 72,000 combined prosecutions a year, at the cost of well over a billion dollars a year, and at the expense of prosecuting more serious crimes. Despite these huge costs and the related human carnage, the criminalization of illegal entry and re-entry is invariably left out of the discussion of comprehensive immigration reform, which reflects the silent treatment these crimes have received in the immigration and criminal law literature more generally. By reviewing eight decades of ineffective policy, this Article makes the case for why there should be a fundamental re-thinking concerning the way in which the United States uses the criminal justice system to regulate immigration.
    [Show full text]
  • CRC in Court: the Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Acknowledgment
    CRC in Court: The Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Acknowledgment CRC in Court: The Case Law of the Convention on the Rights of the Child was written by Patrick Geary for the Child Rights International Network (CRIN). CRIN welcomes comments, suggestions and feedback; contact us at: The Child Rights International Network, 2 Pontypool Place, East Studio, London SE1 8QF, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 20 7401 2257. Email: [email protected]; Web: www.crin.org. Published by Child Rights International Network (CRIN) East Studio 2 Pontypool Place London, SE1 8QF United Kingdom +44 20 7401 2257 www.crin.org First published 2012. © Child Rights International Network 2012 The Child Rights International Network is a charity registered in England and Wales (1125925). Registered Company No. 6653398. CRIN encourages personal and educational use of this publication and grants permission for its reproduction in this capacity where proper credit is given in good faith. For resale or commercial distribution in any other manner, prior permission must be obtained in writing. Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................4 Status of the CRC in National Legal Systems..................................................5 Analysis ...........................................................................................................8 Conclusion......................................................................................................28 Recommendations..........................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Theft What to Do If It Happens To
    Identity Theft: What to Do if It Happens to You You apply for a credit card and get turned down because of a low credit score. Yet you know that you’ve always paid your accounts on time. A debt collector calls to demand payment on a six-month overdue account for a credit card you have never had. You receive a credit card in the mail that you’ve never applied for. What’s happening? You could be a victim of identity theft, where an imposter is using your personal information. The identity thief could use your personal information for any of the following: • They may call your credit card issuer to change the billing address on your credit card account. The imposter then runs up charges on your account. Because your bills are being sent to a different address, it may be some time before you realize there’s a problem. • They may open new credit card accounts in your name. When they use the credit cards and don’t pay the bills, the delinquent accounts are reported on your credit report. • They may establish phone or wireless service in your name. • They may open a bank account in your name and write bad checks on that account. • They may counterfeit checks or credit or debit cards, or authorize electronic transfers in your name and drain your bank account. • They may file for bankruptcy under your name to avoid paying debits they’ve incurred under you name or to avoid eviction. • They may buy a car by taking out an auto loan in your name.
    [Show full text]